Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

19
Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University

Transcript of Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Page 1: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings

Kenneth D. HarrisRutgers University

Page 2: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Aims

We would like to …

Monitor the activity of large numbers of neurons simultaneously

Know which neuron fired when Know which neuron is of which type Estimate our errors

Page 3: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Extracellular Recording Hardware

You can buy two types of hardware, allowing

Wide-band continuous recordings

Filtered, spike-triggered recordings

Page 4: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

The Tetrode Four microwires twisted into a

bundle Different neurons will have

different amplitudes on the four wires

Page 5: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Raw Data

Spikes

Page 6: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

High Pass Filtering Local field potential is primarily at

low frequencies.

Spikes are at higher frequencies.

So use a high pass filter. 800hz cutoff is good.

Page 7: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Filtered Data

Cell 1

Cell 2

Page 8: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Spike Detection Locate spikes at times of

maximum extracellular negativity

Exact alignment is important: is it on peak of largest channel or summed channels?

Page 9: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Data Reduction We now have a waveform for each

spike, for each channel.

Still too much information!

Before assigning individual spikes to cells, we must reduce further.

Page 10: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Principal Component Analysis Create “feature vector” for each spike.

Typically takes first 3 PCs for each channel.

Do you use canonical principal components, or new ones for each file?

Page 11: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

“Feature Space”

Page 12: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Cluster Cutting Which spikes belong to which

neuron?

Assume a single cluster of spikes in feature space corresponds to a single cell

Automatic or manual clustering?

Page 13: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Cluster Cutting Methods Purely manual – time consuming,

leads to high error rates.

Purely automatic – untrustworthy.

Hybrid – less time consuming, lowest error rates.

Page 14: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Semi-automatic Clustering

Page 15: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Cluster Quality Measures Would like to automatically detect

which cells are well isolated.

Will define two measures.

Page 16: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Isolation Distance

Page 17: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

L_ratio

21ratio clusternoise

L cdf N

Page 18: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

False Positives and Negatives

Page 19: Spike Sorting for Extracellular Recordings Kenneth D. Harris Rutgers University.

Room for Improvement? Improved alignment methods, leading

to nicer clusters.

Faster automatic sorting.

Better human-machine interaction.

Fully automatic sorting.