Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.
![Page 1: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6)
Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards
![Page 2: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Experiment Objective
Compare all given gradient gel standards and use their relative mobilities to create the
best fit mathematical model.Use best model to compare two gel samples
![Page 3: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Gathering Data:
Gels 1 and 2
![Page 4: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Hypothesis (Part One)
Standards will be reproducible.
![Page 5: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Hypothesis (Part Two)
Has more proteins than
![Page 6: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Standards
Measured three timesCalculated relative mobilitiesCalculated mean measurementsBest fit mathematical model
![Page 7: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Mathematical Models
Table of Molecular Weights and the Log
of the Molecular Weights:
Protein
Molecular Weight
sLog Molecular
Weights
Myosin 200000.00 5.30
beta-Galactosida
se 116250.00 5.07
Phosphorlyase B 97400.00 4.99
Serum albumin 66200.00 4.82
Ovalbumin 45000.00 4.65
Carbonic anhydrase 31000.00 4.49
Trypsin inhibitor 21500.00 4.33
Lysozyme 14400.00 4.15
Aprotinin 6500.00 3.81
![Page 8: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Best Model Determination
Rank Models tried StdError t-inv Error
1 y=a+bX+cX^2+dX^3 0.0729 2.5706 0.1873
2 y=a+bX+cX^3 0.0935 2.4469 0.2287
3 y=a+bX 0.0968 2.3646 0.2288
4 y=a+bX+cX^2+(lnX)^2 0.089 2.5706 0.2289
5 y=a+bX+cX^2 0.0974 2.4469 0.2383
6 y=a+bX+c(lnX)+d(lnX)^2 0.0957 2.5706 0.2461
![Page 9: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Model with its CI
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
RmMean
logM
wlogMw = 5.96754 - 5.56606 RmMean
+ 9.56238 RmMean**2 - 6.92265 RmMean**3
S = 0.0729144 R-Sq = 98.5 % R-Sq(adj) = 97.6 %
Regression
95% CI
Regression Plot
![Page 10: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Comparison Chart
3.5000
3.7000
3.9000
4.1000
4.3000
4.5000
4.7000
4.9000
5.1000
5.3000
5.5000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Rm
Lo
gM
w PreVs.RmMean
StdLogMwVs.RmMean
StdRmGel1
StdRmGel2
![Page 11: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Reaction
The expansion of the Vitelline Envelope due to contact with sperm over a 30 minute time period.
![Page 12: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Comparing Unknowns to Standards
Vitelline Envelope control Sperm enzyme control Vitelline Envelope + sperm enzyme (t=0 min) Vitelline Envelope + enzyme (t=5 min) Vitelline Envelope + enzyme (t=10 min) Vitelline Envelope + enzyme (t=15 min) Vitelline Envelope + enzyme (t=30 min)
![Page 13: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Results:
Sperm enzyme controls between gels 1 and 2 were similar.
SpermEz SpermEz
5.324899 5.232962
5.226104 4.893098
4.938703 4.844403
4.880003 4.805563
4.805201 4.746631
4.74529 4.660919
4.641404 4.593366
4.556522 4.544095
4.322521 4.396276
4.194351
3.937239
![Page 14: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Results:
Vitelline envelope controls are similar between gels one and two.
VE-control VE-control
5.025182 4.97541
4.836222 4.858922
4.603148 4.675516
4.556547 4.595335
4.507308 4.541261
4.369169 4.474135
4.373088
![Page 15: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Results: In gel 1, the vitelline envelope remains the same
throughout the experiment.
VE control t=0 t=5min t=10min t=15min t=30min
5.04546 5.06347 5.04636 5.04628 5.00209 5.04128
4.85299 4.86845 4.86472 4.85728 4.80612 4.84932
4.63242 4.70620 4.70417 4.69804 4.62657 4.70021
4.59116 4.64479 4.63953 4.63564 4.57749 4.64055
4.54808 4.60985 4.59991 4.59237 4.52437 4.56039
4.42873 4.53289 4.53481 4.52491 4.40474 4.34733
![Page 16: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Results: Vitelline envelope breaks up as the bands
become greater.VE control t=0 t=5min t=10min t=15min t=30min Enz Control
4.99457 5.03009 5.02913 5.02049 5.30636 5.01015 5.25677
4.87586 4.91907 4.91500 4.92597 5.00280 4.92357 4.91052
4.69793 4.84398 4.84474 4.85187 4.90688 4.84508 4.86121
4.62546 4.70464 4.76903 4.78914 4.84393 4.78317 4.82238
4.57774 4.64180 4.70679 4.70738 4.78363 4.70430 4.76481
4.51925 4.56680 4.61328 4.65542 4.70127 4.63763 4.68454
4.43210 4.53940 4.62324 4.64289 4.56924 4.62371
4.55644 4.60213 4.45604 4.58022
4.48425 4.54159 3.96395 4.45204
3.96678 4.46121 4.27900
3.96145 4.05928
![Page 17: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Results: StandardsLogMw Vs. Rm
3.5
3.7
3.9
4.1
4.3
4.5
4.7
4.9
5.1
5.3
5.5
0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65 0.75 0.85 0.95
Rm
Lo
gM
w
Rm1
Rm2
Rm3
Rm4
Rm5
Rm6
Rm7
Rm8
Rm9
Rm10
Rm11
Rm12
Rm13
Rm14
Rm15
Rm16
Rm17
Rm18
Rm19
Rm20
Rm21
Rm22
mean
![Page 18: Sperm Enzyme Preparation (Group 6) Comparing all Gradient Gel Standards.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032522/56649d635503460f94a467eb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusion:
Standards are reproducible.Sperm enzyme breaks up vitelline envelope.
– Number of bands increase.– Small proteins are being detected.