Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr....

105
Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State University 901 S. National Avenue Springfield, MO 65897

Transcript of Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr....

Page 1: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Sperling (1960)

Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and

partial report methods

Dr. Timothy BenderPsychology DepartmentMissouri State University901 S. National AvenueSpringfield, MO 65897

Page 2: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodSperling (1960) is a classic study of the characteristics of the iconic memory (visual sensory memory). One characteristic of the iconic memory that Sperling explored was its capacity, or how much information was available in a single, brief exposure to a visual stimulus.

Page 3: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodAt that time, a common method for studying the capacity of the iconic memory was the Whole Report Method. In that method, research participants would be briefly exposed to a visual stimulus, then asked to recall as much of the information as possible.

Page 4: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodIn Sperling’s research, the participants might see a 2x4 array of letters for 50 milliseconds. They then had to report what letters they saw and in what position.

D J W PB S L M

Page 5: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodIn order for you to get a feel for what that is like, you will see several slides. Each slide has a 2x4 array of letters. The first array will appear for about one second or 1000 milliseconds.

Operating hint: To move to the next slide after each example, be sure the cursor is near the edge of the screen and is in the shape of an arrow. If the cursor is near the middle of the screen and is the shape of the pointing finger, you will repeat that slide.

Page 6: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 7: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodThe next array will appear for nearly 500 milliseconds.

Page 8: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 9: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodThe next array will appear for nearly 100 milliseconds.

Page 10: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 11: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodSperling’s participants frequently were exposed to an array of letters for only 50 milliseconds!

Page 12: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodSperling manipulated both the number of letters in the arrays (experiment one) and the duration of the arrays (experiment two). He found that neither the number of letters nor the duration of the display had an appreciable effect on the results. In general, his participants could remember a maximum of between 4 and 5 letters.

Page 13: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodProcedure:• After the next slide, you will see 10 stimuli. • Each stimulus will start with a slide telling you to get ready. Click on that slide to see the actual stimulus. • Then you will see a + sign in the middle of the screen. Focus on the + sign. • The + sign will remain for about 1 second and will be followed by a 3x4 array of letters. • The array will last for about 70 milliseconds. • Then you will be asked to record the letters from the array.

Page 14: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodYour job is to write down the letters in their correct positions as quickly as you can. It is important that you write down a letter in every position, even if it feels like a guess. However, do NOT just write down all Xs or something like that. Also, do not focus only on one row. That actually may reduce your overall score.

Page 15: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 1

Page 16: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 17: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 18: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 2

Page 19: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 20: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 21: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 3

Page 22: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 23: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 24: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 4

Page 25: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 26: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 27: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 5

Page 28: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 29: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 30: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 6

Page 31: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 32: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 33: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 7

Page 34: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 35: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 36: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 8

Page 37: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 38: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 39: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 9

Page 40: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 41: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 42: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Prepare for Stimulus 10

Page 43: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 44: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 45: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report Method

Scoring Procedure• For each array, give yourself one point for

each letter in the correct position.• Add up your points for all 10 arrays.• Divide that number by 10 to get your mean

number of letters.

Page 46: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report Method

1 TPBW 2 BFJD 3 KGLC 4 SJKB

QNRL KSWZ RBDX VLNY

GXKJ DHMZ FJNT BFHD

5 CKMF 6 LHNG 7 TLOH 8 DMPL

JTXW QCGV WKRT FVZP

FPSY FJPL DGJK HLRX

9 MPQK 10 VNRJ

SDHR TMQS

CGSM FJLH

Page 47: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report Method

Sperling (1960) found that his participants could recall between 4 and 5 of the letters. (If you did as well, that is great. If you did not, do not worry about it. His participants also had more practice than you did and completed the task as individuals rather than in a classroom.)

Page 48: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

One problem with the Whole Report Method is that participants claimed that they saw more letters than they could remember. Apparently, in the time it took to write down the first few letters, the memory for the others was gone. So, Sperling (experiment 3) developed a different technique, called the Partial Report Method.

Page 49: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

In the Partial Report Technique, the participants only had to report one row of the stimuli. They were signaled as to which row of the array to report. The signal was a tone that occurred at the offset of the array and the rows were randomly selected. That way, the participants could not predict which row would be required. The number of letters they recalled from the row was then multiplied by the number of rows to get their score.

Page 50: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

The logic behind the Partial Report Method is clear. If a participant could recall X letters from any one row, then the participant had available in memory X x Y letters, where Y is the total number of rows.

Page 51: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

You will try this in class. You will see 15 different 3x4 arrays of letters. These will be set up like the previous demonstration, with the exception that one of 3 tones will occur at the offset of each array. A high tone means record the top row. A medium tone means record the middle row. A low tone means record the bottom row. The order of the tones has been randomly arranged.

Page 52: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

You will need to listen to the tones a few times in order to recognize which one is high, medium, and low.

Move the cursor over this speaker to hear the high tone.

Move the cursor over this speaker to hear the medium tone.

Move the cursor over this speaker to hear the low tone.

Page 53: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report MethodProcedure• After the next slide, you will see 15 stimuli. • Each stimulus will start with a slide telling you to get ready. Click on that slide to see the actual stimulus. • You will then see a + sign in the middle of the screen. Focus on the + sign. • The + sign will remain for about 1 second and will be followed by a 3x4 array of letters. • The array will last for about 70 milliseconds. • Then you will hear the tone.

Page 54: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Whole Report MethodYour job is to write down the letters in the row that corresponds to the tone. Record the 4 letters in their correct positions as quickly as you can. It is important that you write down a letter in every position, even if it feels like a guess. However, do NOT just write down all Xs or something like that. Also, do not try to predict which row will be cued. That actually may reduce your overall score.

Page 55: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 1

Page 56: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 57: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 58: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 2

Page 59: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 60: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 61: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 3

Page 62: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 63: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 64: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 4

Page 65: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 66: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 67: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 5

Page 68: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 69: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 70: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 6

Page 71: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 72: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 73: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 7

Page 74: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 75: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 76: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 8

Page 77: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 78: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 79: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 9

Page 80: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 81: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 82: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 10

Page 83: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 84: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 85: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 11

Page 86: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 87: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 88: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 12

Page 89: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 90: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 91: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 13

Page 92: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 93: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 94: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 14

Page 95: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 96: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 97: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Get Ready for Stimulus 15

Page 98: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.
Page 99: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Record your response.

Page 100: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

Scoring Procedure• We will treat the first 5 as practice trials, so

we will only score the last 10.• For your last 10 trials, give yourself one point

for each letter in the correct position.• Add up your points for those 10 arrays.• Multiply that number by 3 because there

were three possible rows.• Divide that number by 10 to get your mean

number of letters.

Page 101: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

6 KSMZ 11 KYLP

7 DQFP 12 KPNC

8 DRCL 13 FTRH

9 GBTQ 14 SFQH

10 KXLC 15 MPTS

Page 102: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

Sperling (1960) found that his participants could recall between 9 and 10 of the letters, on the average. (If you did as well, that is great. If you did not, do not worry about it. His participants also had more practice than you did and completed the task as individuals rather than in a classroom.)

Page 103: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

Based on Sperling’s research and similar research by others, it was assumed that we can access at least 9 letters in a single brief glance at a visual stimulus. If you break that into separate bits of information, that is about 40 separate bits of information (Sperling, 1960). Notice, that is at least 40 bits of information. We still do not know an upper limit on the capacity of the iconic memory.

Page 104: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

Partial Report Method

The reason we do not know an upper limit on the capacity of the iconic memory is that the memory trace disappears so rapidly. Simply using arrays with more letters does not help because people start to forget the remaining letters in a row while they record the first ones. Imagine trying to remember a row of 5 or 6 letters. There is a strong possibility that by the time you recorded the first 3 or 4 letters, you would lose access to any others.

Page 105: Sperling (1960) Estimating the Iconic Memory Capacity: Whole report and partial report methods Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State.

References

Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and applied, 74, 1-29.