Spent Fuel Revisited Tad Cleaves [email protected] Energy Law April 26, 2006.
-
Upload
edmund-higgins -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Spent Fuel Revisited Tad Cleaves [email protected] Energy Law April 26, 2006.
Overview
World Demand for Electricity is Growing Nuclear Energy & Fuel Cycle Safety Environment Conclusions
Demand for Electricity is Growing Rapidly
Electricity Consumption will almost double in next two decades. Industrialization Population Expansion
Demand For “Energy” Growing
Oil – Up 50% Coal – Up 57% Natural Gas – Up 140%
Fossil Fuels are Kings of Electricity
Fossil Fuel: ~66% Nuclear: ~17% Hydro: ~17% Other: ~2%
Fuel Supplies are Dwindling
Inexpensive Petroleum Supply measured in terms of decades…
Natural Gas measured in decades to maybe a century…
Coal measured in centuries…
Inexpensive Uranium deposits measured in decades to maybe a century…
More Efficient Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Extend Present Reserves
Lower Carbon Emissions
General Information ~20 % of U.S. electrical
generation
50 % of Illinois electrical generation
Same principles as coal or natural gas plants
103 U.S. nuclear power plants 440 global power plants
All but 2 are Thermal Light Water Reactors
Nuclear Fuel
Thermal Pressurized Water Reactors are most common type of reactor
Start with enriched uranium In nature:
99.3% U238 “Fissionable” and “Fertile” .7% U235 “Fissile”
Enriched Uranium: ~5% U235
Pu239 by-product of neutron absorption. “Fissile”
10
Source of Heat: A Possible Reaction in a Reactor
n + 235U 141Ba + 92Kr + 3n
Masses: U = 235.043 924u
Ba = 140.909 241
Kr = 91.905 038
n = 1.008 665
236.053u 235.84u
11
Mass Difference = E
236.053u 235.84u is a mass difference of 0.2123u
E = mc2
E = 0.2123 x c2
Yields ~ 197.757 MeV energy
Per atom, this is about 5,000,000 times!! the energy released in combustion of oxygen.
The Goal: Controlled Chain Reaction
Two Chain Reactions...Controlled Chain Reaction: Electricity
Uncontrolled Chain Reaction: Bad News…
Spent Fuel: Radioactive “Waste”
3 Classes of “Waste” Material1. Fission Products (5%)
– Mostly Cesium 137 and Strontium 90– Dangerous ~300 years
2. Uranium 238 (~94%)
3. Transuranics (1%)– Everything “heavier” than Uranium– Dangerous, long-lived isotopes.– 10,000+ year half-lives
Transuranics…
Once-Through Fuel Cycle
All of this material is considered “waste” Inefficient:
Only 5% of potentially fissionable atoms have been used!!
Only 10% of mined uranium is converted into fuel in enrichment process.
Bottom Line: Less that 1% of the ore’s total energy is
used to generate energy in once-through regime!
This “Waste” Can Still Power Reactors
Needs to be “Reprocessed” First France, Japan, Russia, and UK reprocess Jimmy Carter banned civilian reprocessing
in US in 1977Fear of weapons-grade Pu239 proliferation
Two types of reprocessing: PUREX and Pyro
PUREX
Plutonium URanium ExtractionDevised for weapons manufactureSynonymous with “reprocessing” when
reprocessing was banned in 1970s Extracts pure Pu239 from spent fuel
Pu239 is the isotope of Pu used for atomic weapons
PUREX for Electricity
Pu239 is used to power reactors in the form of metal oxides (MOX).Can be burned in thermal reactors
Total Energy Usage:6% of original reactor fuel energy is used 94% still unharnessedMassive amounts of waste left over.
The Pyrometallurgical Process
“Pyro” collects virtually all of the transuranics and much of the uranium Few transuranics in the
final waste stream
Pure Pu239 is never isolated
Based on electroplating
Problems with Pyro…
Basic principles have been demonstrated, but the technology is not ready for immediate commercial use.
The fuel extracted can be burned in Fast Reactors only.NOT usable in Thermal Light Water ReactorsOnly 2 Fast Reactors operating in the world…
“Fast” Refers to Neutron “Speed”
Light Water Reactors take advantage of “Slow,” thermal neutrons These neutrons can easily split unstable, fissile
atoms: Pu239, U235
Sometimes split other atoms: U238
High “capture cross section” Fast Neutrons
Have higher “fission cross section” Can split all actinides
Fission vs. Capture in PWR and Fast Reactor
Fast Reactor Designs
Energy Efficiency of Fast Reactors
Can recover 99% of energy in spent thermal reactor fuel
After thermal reactor fuel runs out, Fast reactors can burn depleted uranium.Depleted = Non-enriched U238
99% energy recovery MUCH GREATER YIELD
Fast Reactors In Operation
Not a new technology… Los Alamos, NM, 1946
Naval Applications Especially Soviet
US, France, Russia, and Japan have built FRs India is pursuing FRs
Only 2 in civilian operation France & Russia
Why are FRs not in use?
“Reprocessing” is a bad word. Out-dated bias
“Pyro” process also untested commercially No infrastructure at this point
Uranium is inexpensive Fuel is not significant portion of cost ~5% of total cost of nuclear generation is fuel Compared to ~75%-80% of cost of natural gas
generation. Easier keep loading the proven thermal reactors with
cheap uranium…
Greater Safety Issues?
No Safer than light water reactors
Operate at atmospheric pressureUse liquid metal coolant instead of waterHave more passive safety features
Strong track recordThe problems encountered (e.g. Monju, Japan)
have resulted in little more than big messes…No radiation released.
No Plutonium Proliferation
Fast Reactors efficiently consume plutonium.Light Water reactors are plutonium breeders
The only waste products are the “fission products”Nuclear Ash
No “Plutonium Mines”
Bad Presentation Timing…Chernobyl Disaster – 20 Years Ago, TODAY!
Cause Unauthorized testing that caused
the reactor to lose control Reactor lost control
Effect Steam explosion blew the top
containment off the reactor core Large contamination release
across a 20 square mile area LIFE: 48 deaths directly
Shady records… Thousand exposed to elevated
radiation
Other Energy Related Accidents
China Coal Mining Industry (11/05) Qitahe, China: 171 workers were killed
5,491 coal workers deaths in 2005 Unofficial statistics closer to 20,000 deaths…
2,900 reported accidents
Environmentally Superior
Emission free The only waste produced by FRs with this fuel
cycle is nuclear ash. 1,000 MWe FR would produce 1 ton of fission
products. (1% the “waste” of light water reactor) Only very small amounts of long-lived transuranics
FRs can burn the 30+ years-worth of stored spent fuel.
No need for long-term storage (Yucca Mountain)
Environmental Cost of Hydro
Before & After: Grand Coulee Dam
Everything has a price...
Conclusions
Need more researchPyro and FRs in large-scale production
Several Decades Required Huge upside
Produce electricity indefinitelyTransmutate nuclear wastePrice StabilityEnvironmentally sound
For more information: Decide the Nuclear Issues for Yourself Nuclear need not be
Unclear by J.A.L Robertson http://www.magma.ca/~jalrober/Decide.htm
The New Economics of Nuclear Power, World Nuclear Association, http://www.uic.com.au/neweconomics.pdf
The Path to Sustainable Nuclear Energy Basic and Applied Research Opportunities for Advanced Fuel Cycles, 2005, http://www.sc.doe.gov/bes/reports/files/PSNE_rpt.pdf
http://www.energy.gov/engine/content.do?BT_CODE=NUCLEAR
Smarter Use of Nuclear Waste by William Hannum
Questions??