Occupational Therapy & Speech and language Therapy Lenses on Assessment
Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
-
Upload
speech-language-therapy-in-practice -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
1/32
Collaborationworks!Early Years Centresunder scrutiny
EthicsDilemmasand decisions
Changingpractice
A journey
withpre-terminfants
Welcome MatsTraining themultidisciplinary way
In my experienceA tongue-in-cheek view ofresearch
How I managedeafness in childrenand young people
My top resourcesUndergraduate education
InclusionSwitching on toShakespeare
E N T H U S I A S M I S I N F E C T I O U S !
ISSN 136
SPRING
http://wwwspeechmagcom
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
2/32
WinALPHASMARTDo you see clients who have difficulty
with structuring and organising theirwork? Who struggle to express their ideaseasily? Or perhaps who have trouble with
vocabulary, spelling or handwriting?Help is at hand for a lucky reader, as Speech& Language Therapy in Practice has a
copy of the AlphaSmart 3000 computer-companion pre-loaded with the Co:Writer SmartApplet (shortlisted forthe BETT 2002 Special Educational Needs award) to give away in a FREE
draw, courtesy of AlphaSmart.To enter, simply e-mail your name and address marked Speech &Language Therapy in Practice - AlphaSmart offer to
[email protected]. The closing date for receipt of entries is25th April and the winner will be notified by 30th April.The AlphaSmart 3000 computer-companion enables people to type,
edit and electronically store text (for example, for assignments, e-mailsor notes), while at the same time developing keyboard skills, withouthaving to be at a computer. Text and information can then be easily
transferred to a PC or Mac or straight to a printer. It is being used inschools for all age ranges and ability groups and for children with spe-cial needs, but would also be suitable for adult clients who have access
to a computer.
The AlphaSmart has been designed to run SmartApplets, mini applicationsthat extend its functionality to aid literacy and learning. The Co:Writer
SmartApplet was developed by Don Johnston to help people focus on thecontent of their writing. Co:Writer word prediction technology allowsthem to construct sentences which are grammatically correct using topic-
specific words.The AlphaSmart 3000 (www.alphasmart.co.uk) is available for around190 per unit from a variety of sources including TAG Learning
(www.taglearning.com). An AlphaSmart pre-loaded with Co:Writer canbe purchased for around 230 from Don Johnston and copies of Co:Writercan be purchased individually for 89 (www.donjohnston.com/uk).
Spring 02 speechmag
New IndexIn need of inspiration? Doing aliterature review? Or justwanting to find that fantasticarticle you read recently?Searching Speech & Language
Therapy in Practicejust goteasier, with an index to backcopies now available on the
speechmagwebsite!
Reprinted articles to complementthe Spring 2002 issue of Speech& Language Therapy in Practice:
Mother and child - building thebonds beyond speech. (Nov/Dec1994, 4 (1))**Sue Sims used a BT Bursary award to conducta ground breaking study of mother-childinteraction in preverbal infants. Her pilotinvestigation looks at the effects of recurrentupper respiratory tract infection on the vitalearly stages of communication development.
Talking Mats: Speech and languageresearch in practice. (Autumn 1998)***Even experienced communication aid userscan struggle to express complex views.Joan Murphy describes the impact a lowtech tool developed to address this hashad on the lives of people with severecommunication difficulties.
Whose needs come first? (Summer1999)***The variable use of objects of referencewith children and adults with severe andprofound learning disabilities raises manyquestions. Advisory teacher Keith Parkchallenges us to address issues ofindividualisation, theory and practice,multidisciplinary collaboration andworking with parents.
Also on the site - contents of back issues
and news about the next one, links to othersites of practical value and information aboutwriting for the magazine. Pay us a visit soonand try out our search facility and index.
Remember - youcan also subscribeor renew online viaa secure server!From Speech Therapy in Practice*/HumanCommunication**, courtesy of Hexagon
Publishing, or from Speech & LanguageTherapy in Practice***
w
ww
.speechm
ag.c
om
READER OFFERSREADEROFFERREADEROFFERREADERO
FFER
Win SPEAKING & LISTENINGTHROUGH NARRATIVENarrative intervention is taking speech and language therapy by storm.Heres your chance to come on board, with copies of Speaking & ListeningThrough Narrative available in a FREE draw to two lucky readers of Speech
& Language Therapy in Practice, courtesy of Black Sheep Press.To enter, send your name and address on a post-card or sealed envelope to, Speech & Language
Therapy in Practice - SLTN offer, Alan Henson,Black Sheep Press, 67 Middleton, Cowling,Keighley, W. Yorks BD22 0DQ by 25th April. The
winners will be notified by 30th April.This pack presents a flexible approach to develop-ing speaking and listening skills through narrative
with small groups of children aged from around4-6 years. Sample session plans guide therapistsand teachers in raising childrens awareness of
the individual components of a simple story,retelling, then generating their own storyideas. During the pilot study in Stockport,
author Becky Shanks recorded significantimprovements in children on formal languageassessments and in attention, listening and
confidence in the classroom.Speaking & Listening Through Narrative is available for 40 + 3 p&pfrom Black Sheep Press, tel. 01535 631 346,
or online at www.blacksheep-epress.com.
The winners of the Black Sheep Press prize draw in the Autumn 2001 issuewere: Concepts in Pictures - Clair Brookes, Helen Glover and South TynesideHealth Care NHS. Time to Sing CD - People in Communities Family Project, M.
Tydfil and Deirdre Oxx.Congratulations also to Speechmarks Working with Dysphagia winners fromthe Winter 2001 issue: Linda Collier, Julia Loughlan, Sarah Harris, PetreaWoolard and Deborah Marshall.
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
3/32
Inside coverSpring 02 speechmagReader offersWin AlphaSmart 3000 with Co:Writer
SmartApplet. Win Speaking &Listening Through Narrative. See
also p.20 to win a Talking Mats
and Learning Disability Package.
2 News/Comment
7 ReviewsAutism, voice, language, linguistics,
phonology assessment, mutism.
8 The earlyintervention gap - can
we fix it? (Yes, I CAN!)
...parents reported the adaptiveand social behaviours of the I CAN
Centre children to have
significantly improved (expressive,
compliant and pro-social
behaviour).
Following evaluation of I CANs
pioneering Early Years Centres,
Alex Hall argues it is now time for
us to put our money where our
mouth is - and shift resources out
of the clinic.
11 Further readingAAC, Fragile X, stammering,
dysphagia, stroke, voice.
12 Making the case for changeFrom the evidence collected - and from our own
experience of working with young children with
feeding related problems - we can see the potential
for altering our practice.
Elspeth Mair and Anne Scott scour the literature for
evidence on best practice with pre-term infants and
argue for our earlier involvement in the
multidisciplinary team.
16 Preliminary findings of aninformal longitudinal study into the
research / practice interface: notingthe influence of extra trees in thewood rather than throwing thebaby out with the bath-waterI never again want to wake from a nightmare
saying, Please dont make eye-contact with Jim - hes
in the control group for Intensive Interaction.
Cath Irvine is passionate about her work with adults
with learning disabilties. Here, she takes a tongue-in-
cheek look at the challenges of evaluating its
effectiveness.
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 2002 1
18 Let your mats do the talkingMany participants did not initially like the thought of
using the video...Despite this expressed dislike, it was
clear that the use of the video was a crucial part of the
learning process.
Therapy tools are only as
successful as the practitioner
who uses them so Joan Murphy
and Lois Cameron have
developed a winning format
for multidisciplinary training
in the use of Talking Mats.
21 Resources /
Feedback on Intothe Mouths ofBabes article
22 From dilemmafacing to decisionmakingShould medical ethics be
incorporated into undergraduate
and postgraduate speech and
language therapy training?
Are we fully equipped to deal
with many of these challenges
at the level of basic dysphagia
training? Are we involved
enough in close working with
doctors and nurses in making these difficult decisions?
Fiona Graham and Alison Davison find that training inmedical ethics as applied to dysphagia management
has improved their team working, note keeping,
confidence and objectivity.
25 How I manage deafness inchildren and young people...good multidisciplinary relationships provide the key
as the speech and language therapy service would be
struggling were it to go it alone.
The value of speech and language therapy for deaf
children is now widely recognised, but the debate
about how we can best organise and deliver our
service continues. Liz Fairweather, Liz Kraft and Susan
Howden offer their views.
Back cover
My Top ResourcesSuccess in learning to be a good clinician results from
commitment of a university, in partnership with clinical
supervisors, to the development of students as active
participants, with responsiblity for their own learning.
Aileen Patterson finds the best resources in
undergraduate education are often human.
SPRING 2002(publication date 25th February)
ISSN 1368-2105
Published by:Avril Nicoll33 Kinnear SquareLaurencekirkAB30 1ULTel/fax 01561 377415e-mail: [email protected]
Production:Fiona Reid
Fiona Reid DesignStraitbraes FarmSt. CyrusMontrose
Website design and maintenance:Nick BowlesWebcraft UK Ltdwww.webcraft.co.uk
Printing:Manor Creative7 & 8, Edison RoadEastbourneEast SussexBN23 6PT
Editor:
Avril Nicoll RegMRCSLT
Subscriptions and advertising:Tel / fax 01561 377415
Avril Nicoll 2002Contents of Speech & LanguageTherapy in Practice reflect the viewsof the individual authors and notnecessarily the views of the publisher.Publication of advertisements is notan endorsement of the advertiseror product or service offered.
Any contributions may also appearon the magazines internet site.
ContentsSPRING 2002
Cover picture by Paul Reid.See p.4.Thanks to Billy Walker and speechand language therapists and staff at
Kingspark School, Dundee.
www.speechmag.com
IN FUTURE ISSUESLITERACY ATTENTION VOICE CASELOAD MANAGEMENT
EDUCATION AAC
4 Switching on to
Shakespeare: A
Midsummer Nights DreamA large glittery blanket (the wall
through which Pyramus and Thisbe
have been talking) is held up by one or
two people so that everyone can see it.
It is gradually lowered over someone as
the adieus are called out, and then
thrown over someone as everyone
suddenly shouts Byeeee!
Keith Park turns bard as pupils with
severe and profound learningdisabilities participate in a series of
poetry workshops at Shakespeares
Globe Theatre.
COVER STORY
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
4/32
Television personality Lorraine Kelly presents the inaugural Women Who Mean Business
award from the Dundee and Angus network Women Ahead to Speech & Language Therapy
in Practice editor Avril Nicoll. The aim of the award was to celebrate the achievements of
ordinary women who juggle commitments to family and friends, work and the community.
Avril commented that, luckily, a tidy house was not part of the judging criteria. The 1000
prize money is being used to purchase a digital camera and dictaphone for Speech &
Language Therapy in Practice, and should also provide an opportunity for Avril to travel in
the UK to report on innovative practice. www.womenahead.co.uk
news
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 20022
Developmentsfor deaf peopleThe Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists has con-
tributed to the development of a dedicated website set up in
response to the piloting in England of Universal Neonatal
Hearing Screening.
The aim of the screening is to test all newborn babies for deafness
within the first few days of life to lower the average age of iden-
tification of deafness from twenty months to three months and
allow families to take positive action to support the development
of language and communication much earlier. The website,
launched by the Royal National Institute for the Deaf, is a new
training and information resource for professionals who work
with deaf babies to help them support families and be aware of
best practice in areas such as language and communication.
www.deafnessatbirth.org.uk
Meanwhile, RNID has welcomed the governments announce-
ment that it plans to modernise audiology services in England to
give more people access to digital hearing aids on the NHS.
However, the charity points out that two thirds of all people inEngland will still not have access to digital aids because of where
they live.
RNID, tel. 020 7296 8000, www.rnid.org.uk
Autism.The problem is
understandingAn advertising campaign has kickedoff the 40th anniversary of the UKs
leading autism charity.
The National Autistic Society hopes the
simple strapline, Autism. The problem is
understanding, together with back-up
autism information resources provided
by telephone or the Internet will
increase public awareness of the com-
plex needs and experiences of people
with autism. With the money raised
through its 40th anniversary campaign,
the Society intends to expand theAutism Helpline operation, train more
practitioners in the use of the EarlyBird
programme, increase participation in
the NAS Autism Accreditation
Programme, expand adult services and
schools capacity, and develop its advoca-
cy, volunteer and employment work.
NAS Supporters Line, tel. 08702 33 40
40; Autism Helpline, tel. 0870 600 85 85,
www.autism.co.uk / www.nas.co.uk.
The UK charity dedicated to supporting research into hearing
problems believes the watchful waiting policy on glue ear has
gone too far.
Defeating Deafness is calling for earlier referral to ear, nose and
throat specialists of those most likely to benefit from surgery, cit-
ing recent research that suggests children with glue ear are at
risk of behavioural and educational problems lasting well into
their teens*. Its five-point checklist urges early referral of chil-
dren with persisting hearing loss especially if they
1. show related behaviour and communication problems
2. are prone to repeated ear infections
3. are exposed to smoking at home
4. attend - or have siblings attending - school, playgroup or nursery
5. have a family history of ear infections and glue ear.
Professor Mark Haggard, Director of the Medical Research
Councils Institute of Hearing Research and Chief Adviser to
Defeating Deafness believes the correct intervention for estab-
lished glue ear is surgery, particularly for children over the age of
three-and-a-half. He says, This concept of watchful waiting to
stop children being routed too directly into surgery was a neces-
sary step in its time, but the policy has now gone too far. There
are no firm guidelines about when to stop watching and do
something. The charity has produced a new edition of its parent
information leaflets in light of this.
www.defeatingdeafness.org, freephone 0808 808 2222.
*The paper Behaviour and developmental effects of otitis media
with effusion into the teens from Arch Dis Child (2001; 85) is
available on the website.
Watchfulwaiting - but
for how long?
PicturebyWalterNielson,
tel.01592655303,
forCaledoniamagazin
e.
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
5/32SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 2002 3
news & comment
Enthusiasm isinfectious!Pop Idols Gareth Gates is clearly relishing his new role. A seventeen year old with
what the judges describe as the complete package and a voice of the moment,
Gareth responded well to voice coaching and feedback and consistently turned in
expressive, confident performances in spite of - and no doubt partly because of -
his experience of a severe stammer. Gareths barely contained enthusiasm forbeing in front of an audience, attending movie premieres, photo shoots, meet-
ing other stars and going to recording studios is infectious and he is a great
role model for young people with communication difficulties.
We dont know whether, given his stammer, Gareth would have found his
way to pop stardom by a more conventional route. Inclusion often requires us
to think differently - as Keith Park(p4) did when taking students with severe
and profound learning disabilities to the Globe Theatre to participate in A
Midsummer Nights Dream, the sights, sounds, smells and people of a real
theatre generating more enthusiasm among professionals and clients than
dry clinic or school imitations.
Pop Idol judges talked about the elusive X factor - difficult to describe, but
you know it when you see it. The specialists writing for How I manage deafness
in children and young people (p25) for example remind us that, howeverskilled you become at your craft, enthusiasm remains a basic aspect.
Cath Irvine (p16) almost has us believing that she despairs of staff who
become so enthusiastic about their work that they mess up her research
designs - however her own enthusiasm for the value of research in practice
shines through.Joan Murphyand Lois Cameron (p18) also mix research with
clinical practice. Recognising that therapy tools are only as good as the person
who uses them, they planned multidisciplinary training to enable the users to
generate their own enthusiasm and therefore improve their learning. This
approach also underlies Aileen Pattersons top resources (back page) for
undergraduate students. A literature review, visits to other areas and attendance
at a conference stimulated the enthusiasm ofAnne Scottand Elspeth Mair(p12)
for improving services to pre-term infants. Fiona Graham andAlison Davison
(p22) attended a multidisciplinary conference on an ethics approach to
dysphagia management, and enthusiasm for this now permeates all their work.
Alex Halls excitement about I CANs pioneering Early Years nurseries (p8) is
palpable, but enthusiasm alone is not enough. The initial research findings on
outcome and cost effectiveness, however, suggest that we can now drive
forward a different style of service delivery to young children with persistent
communication difficulties.
As members of a profession facing constant change and recruitment / retention
difficulties, and with ever-increasing demands on our time and skills, we have
to hang on to our enthusiasm - and make sure it is catching.
...comment...Avril Nicoll
Editor
Kinnear Square
Laurencekirk
AB UL
tel/ansa/fax
email
avrilnicoll@speechmagcom
Putting pupils firstAn Order of Parliament next year will give Local
Education Authorities in England greater freedom
to form partnerships which put pupils first.
Schools Minister Stephen Timms believes creative
partnerships with other Local Education
Authorities and external providers such as private
companies, voluntary bodies and non-profit-mak-
ing organisations will bring benefits in the deliveryof Special Educational Needs assessment and early
years development work.
Software awardsThe software shortlisted for the BETT 2002 Special
Educational Needs category was:
Learnhow Publications - IEP Writer 2
Crick Software - Find Out and Write About Series
(winner)
SEMERC - Assessability
Don Johnston Special Needs - Co:Writer
SmartApplet
CALSC Communication & Learning Skills Centre -Mastering Memory
Stroke donationsThe Stroke Association can now take donations
online. The organisation funds around 2 million
of research each year to look for successful thera-
pies and find ways to prevent strokes.
www.stroke.org.uk
Calling aphasia
cliniciansThe British Aphasiology Society is encouragingclinicians to present a paper at its therapy sym-
posia in September.
In particular, it believes practising clinicians may
have discovered effective ways of encouraging
generalisation, working in the community and
using volunteers and technology. To assist thera-
pists who have not presented papers before, the
Society is allocating them a mentor.
Further details from Rosemary Cunningham, tel.
01332 254679, e-mail [email protected].
Seamless careThe growing emphasis on the need for seamless
care for patients is behind the development of
the new Institute of Health Sciences at City
University.
The language and communication science depart-
ment will join with nursing and midwifery, radiog-
raphy, optometry and the health management
group to form the Institute, which will have close
links with other health and counselling groups.
Health-related activities account for a third of all
academic activity at City University. The Institute is
looking for opportunities for students from differ-
ent health professions to work, train and research
together to produce strong disciplines who also
understand the contributions made by others.
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
6/32
Switching on to
Shakespeare:A Midsummer Nights Dream
cover story
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 20024
hy should young people with
severe and profound learning
disabilities want to experience
the story line, the atmosphere
and the language of
Shakespeares A Midsummer Nights Dream in
performance on stage at Shakespeares Globe
Theatre? Vygostsky (1978, p.88) observed,
Human learning presupposes a specific social
nature and a process by which children grow into
the intellectual life of those around them.
Life experiences and opportunities for people
with the highest support needs are often very
restricted, and so Vygotsky presents us with an
interesting challenge: if we do share a social
nature, and the intellectual life of a shared cul-
tural heritage, how might we include people with
multiple disabilities? Our poetry workshops are
an exploration of this question.Shakespeare seemed an obvious starting point:
his monumental and enduring influence on
English language and culture has been described
by Bernard Levin (1983, 167-168) in one long and
enthusiastic sentence:
If you cannot understand my argument, and
declare Its Greek to me, you are quoting
Shakespeare; if you claim to be more sinned
against than sinning, you are quoting
Shakespeare; if you recall your salad days, you are
quoting Shakespeare; if you act more in sorrow
than in anger, if your wish is father to the thought,
if your property has vanished into thin air, you are
quoting Shakespeare; if you have ever refused to
budge an inch or suffered from green-eyed jeal-
ousy, if you have played fast and loose, if you have
been tongue-tied, a tower of strength, hoodwinked
or in a pickle, if you have knitted your brows, made
a virtue of necessity, insisted on fair play, slept not
one wink, stood on ceremony, danced attendance
(on your lord and master), laughed yourself into
stitches, had short shrift, cold comfort or too
much of a good thing, if you have seen better
days or lived in a fools paradise - why, be that as
it may, the more fool you, for it is a foregone con-
clusion that you are (as good luck would have it)
quoting Shakespeare; if you think it is early days
and clear out bag and baggage, if you think it is
high time and that is the long and short of it, if
W
see
www.
peechm
ag.
com
insidefro
nt
cover
you believe that the game is up
and that truth will out even if it
involves your own flesh and
blood, if you lie low till the
crack of doom because you sus-
pect foul play, if you have your
teeth set on edge (at one fell
swoop) without rhyme or rea-
son, then - to give the devil his
due - if the truth were known
(for surely you have a tongue in your head), you
are quoting Shakespeare; even if you bid me good
riddance and send me packing, if you wish I was
dead as a doornail, if you think I am an eyesore, a
laughing stock, the devil incarnate, a stony-heart-
ed villain, bloody-minded or a blinking idiot, then
- by Jove! O Lord! Tut, tut! for goodness sake!
what the dickens! but me no buts - it is all one to
me, for you are quoting Shakespeare.Our second aim was for participants to develop
language and communication skills within the frame-
work of the poetry workshops. Examples include:
1. Awareness
demonstrating any kind of awareness of the
sights and sounds of the activities
2. Anticipation
for example, demonstrating an anticipation of the
loud donkey noises that end two of the activities
3. Turn-taking
participating, in any way, in the turn-taking call
and response structure of the activities
4. Showing self
the participant demonstrates a this is me behaviour
to gain someone elses attention by, for example,
smiling, laughing, eye contact, and vocalizing
5. Showing objects
this is a look at this, attention-sharing behaviour
6. Giving objects
in contrast to the showing objects behaviour
7. Seeking physical proximity
moving, or turning, towards another person to
indicate intention or desire to communicate
8. Gaze alternation
looking from an object to someone else - or
vice versa - as a means of sharing attention
9. Joint attention
two or more people are intentionally looking
at the same thing (or person) at the same time
10.Declarative pointing
pointing to an object, while look-
ing at the communication partner
before, during or after the point,
to indicate look at that.
Participants who do not have
speech may also use VOCAs (Voice
Output Communication Aids).
Anecdotal evidence suggests that,
while many Alternative and
Augmentative Communication (AAC) users may
often be provided with switches to respond to
questions, they do not always have the opportu-
nities to initiate an interaction so, in particular, we
wanted to give participants who are switch users
the opportunity to initiate each of the exchanges. It
seems a priority that, when an aim is to encourage
the use of a switch and its social functions, we
should also provide opportunities for users to initi-ate and then to practise a new skill. Therefore the
lines that start each activity are context-setting,
and then become time-independent, so they can be
repeated as often as possible throughout the activ-
ity. This allows switch users to contribute through-
out the exchanges. It follows that it is also useful to
provide them with a pre-recorded message that is
the final line of an exchange, or of a song or story.
Initiated by a switch userEach of the six activities from A Midsummer
Nights Dream (see figure 1) contain extracts of
original text that is performed in call and response
(one or more persons calling out the words, and
the others then repeating those words or respond-
ing by any movement or sound). Each of the work-
shop activities can be initiated by a switch user say-
ing the first line, as indicated in italics in figure 1.
Each first line is also time-independent and can be
used repeatedly throughout each activity. For
example, Titanias snoring initiates the first
exchange and, when repeated, can contribute to
the comic effect of the activity. The final line of
each activity, also indicated in italics in figure 1, is
called out by everyone together. Participants with
sensory impairments may also use a drum or tam-
bour, and the resonance of the wooden stage. In
the classroom a resonance board can be used.
We have been very fortunate in having access to the
if you agree withShakespeare when he says
Question your desires never anything can be
amiss When simplenessand duty tender it
How happy some oer
other some can be!
Read this
Keith Park turns bard as two groups of pupils with severe and profound learning disabilities participate in aseries of poetry workshops at Shakespeares Globe Theatre. Get your communication aids, parachute, glitteryblanket and drum ready, and prepare to join in the fun...
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
7/32SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 2002 5
cover story
6. Let the audience look to their eyes
So says Bottom, convinced that their play Pyramus andThisbe will move the audience to tears. TheMidsummer Nights Dream is full of references to eyesand the imagery of vision. Helena says Love looks notwith the eyes but with the mind and that Demetrius isdoting on Hermias eyes - an indication that this mightnot be true love. All the mistakes follow from magicpotions to the eyes. This is a brief selection of poeticimages about eyes and vision from the play. Linesfive and six are spoken by Hermia as the two coupleswake up in the woods the next morning, dazed andconfused. The final two lines are Oberons, as hereleases Titania from the magic spell of her love for
the donkey-headed Bottom.SssshhhhUpon thy eyes I throwAll the power this charm doth oweI see these things with parted eye,When every thing seems double.I will her charmed eye releaseAnd all things shall be peaceSssshhhh
Activity:These lines are spoken quietly, initiated by the switchusers Sssshhhh, while a parachute is gently raisedand lowered over all participants. As the final longSssshhhh is spoken the parachute is released andcovers everyone, and is followed by as long a silenceas possible. This is a calm and quiet activity to endthe workshop.
5. Pyramus and Thisbe
This is the silliest stuff that ever I heard. Sosays one of the characters (V, i) about the playPyramus and Thisbe presented by Bottom andhis friends to the nobles at court. It ends withPyramus, believing Thisbe to be dead, stabbinghimself (lines 1-4); Thisbe then appears, seesPyramus dead, and duly stabs herself (lines 5-7).
OooohhhhO Fates, come, come!Cut thread and thrum;Quail, crush,Conclude and quell!And, farewell, friends;Thus Thisbe ends:AdieuAdieuByeeeeee!!
Activity:A chance for some real over-the-top acting, withthe words being accompanied by grand sweepinggestures. A pre-recorded melodramatic groan -Oooohhhh - on a switch initiates the activity,and can then be repeated throughout, toaccentuate the comedy of the awful acting. Alarge glittery blanket (the wall through whichPyramus and Thisbe have been talking) is heldup by one or two people so that everyone cansee it. It is gradually lowered over someone asthe adieus are called out, and then thrown oversomeone as everyone suddenly shouts Byeeee!
Figure 1 - Workshop activities from A Midsummer Nights Dream
1. Oberon
Storyline:Oberon, the king of the fairies, is having anargument with his queen Titania (II, ii). He decides to teachher a lesson, and puts a magic herb on her eyes as she sleeps.She will fall in love with whatever she sees when waking up -Bottom, with the head of a donkey (III, i). Titania is snoring.....
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz..........
What thou seest when thou dost wake,Do it for thy true-love take;When thou wakest, it is thy dear:Wake when some vile thing is near.Eee - Eee - Eee - Eee orr!!!I pray thee, gentle mortal, sing againEee orr!! Eee orr!! Eee orr!!
Activity:One person (or two or three) is in the middle of the circle asTitania. The lines are spoken in call and response; after theexchange is initiated by Titania with the snoring sound recordedon the switch, everyone makes a very loud donkey noise.The first Eee orr is done rather like a sneeze (Eee Eee EeeEee-Orr! like Aah Aah Aah Choo!) to provide an exaggeratedanticipation. The donkey sounds can then be repeated twicemore - and even louder - in reply to Titanias words on wakingup. This activity is also done using a parachute: participants
gently wave the parachute over the sleeping head(s) ofTitania; the parachute is then dropped by everyone (as theEee-Eee-Eee is spoken) except one or two people who quicklypull back the material to reveal the waking Titania as everyonecalls out Eee-orrr! (Our parachute is dark blue with brightyellow stars - the sky of the Midsummer Night.)
2. Hermia to Helena
Storyline:Helena and Hermia are lost in the woodsand are very cross with each other (III, ii). Inthe play, Helena is often played by someonetall, and Hermia by someone short, hencethe painted maypole and dwarf insults inthe next two extracts.
You puppet, you!Painted maypole!How low am I?Not yet so lowBut that my nailsCan reach intoThine eyes!
Aaarrgghh!
Activity:This activity is initiated by Helenas wordsYou puppet you! pre-recorded on theswitch. Hermias lines are spoken withsimulated anger, starting quietly and gettinglouder each line, until the Aaarrgghh isscreamed out with everyone stamping theirfeet and waving their arms in a simulatedtemper tantrum. If Helenas words are
repeated by the switch user throughoutthe exchange, it contributes to the effectof two people having a noisy argumentOne or more participants can be in themiddle of the circle as Helena, to provide afocal point for Hermias invective.
3. Helena and Lysander,to Hermia
Storyline:Helena and Lysander take theirturn at insulting Hermia (III, ii).
Oooohhhh!When shes angryShe is keen and shrewd
Though she be but littleShe is fierceGet you gone you dwarfYou minimusYou beadYou acornOooohhhh
Activity:The Oooohhhh! on the switchstarts this exchange, which wedo in a pantomime dame style(think Julian Clary) to provide acontrast to the previous activity.It finishes with everyoneputting their hands on theirhips and calling out a veryexaggerated Oooohhhh!
Participants can also suggestanother character whose stylecan be imitated - ClintEastwood (make my day) orPatsy or Edina from AbsolutelyFabulous.
4. Bottom
Storyline:After his Midsummer Nights Dream,Bottom wakes up and announces: Iwill get Peter Quince to write a balladof this dream: it shall be calledBottoms Dream, because it hath nobottom (IV, i). But he just cannotget the words right.
Eee orrI have had a dreamMethought I was -Methought I had -The eye of manHath not heardThe ear of manHath not seenWhat my dream wasMan is but an assEee orrr!!
Activity:The Eee orrr that dominates thisexchange is heavily ironic: an Eeeeorrr that means something like stu -pid. Anyone who has ever seen JohnCleese and others playingthe verygormless Mr and Mrs Gumby (knottedhandkerchief on head, rolling eyes,trousers rolled up, arms held out likepenguin flippers, and calling outDhhrrr!) may have a role model.
Mark Rylance, Artistic Director of the Globe Theatre,meeting the group of pupils from Charlton School whoare doing A Midsummer Nights Dream on stage.
pisode 2: Hermia to Helena:Thine eyes!
Aaaarrrggghhh!!!How low am I?Not yet so lowBut that my nailsCan reach into
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
8/32
cover story
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 20026
Encounter: being present, being provided with
sensations.
Nicole attended each of the workshops. Shewas placed in the centre of the semi-circle of
the participants, and was supported by amember of staff sitting next to her. Nicole layon the stage floor; participants stamped on
the stage floor during the words of theexchange so that she could feel the vibrations.
Awareness: noticing that something is going on.
When the gong was used during the workshops
(episodes 1 and 6), Nicole would often turntowards it. She also often looked at and
reached for the parachute (episode 6) as it waslowered over her as well as the glittery blanket(episode 5).
Attention and response: showing surprise,enjoyment, dissatisfaction.
Nicole smiled when she was helped to use thedrum to set the tempo of the call and response.On several occasions she answered the sound
and resonance of the gong by calling out in aloud and low call (confirmed by her family whowatched the video of the workshop).
Engagement: directed attention, intentionallooking, listening, showing interest, recognition.
On many occasions, Nicole looked at the white
glittery blanket as it was lowered over her aspart of one of the activities (episode 5). Shealso directed her attention towards the gong
and the parachute on many occasions.
Participation: supported participation, sharing,
turn-taking.
With the support of a member of staff, Nicolefully participated in the turn-taking of the call
and response method of storytelling by beat-ing the drum. This enabled her to help initiateeach activity.
REV
stage of the Globe Theatre, and also the participation
of three actors from the Globe, whose enthusiasm
and commitment helped to make the workshops
very special. On several occasions we were also able
to use the musical instruments that were used in the
Globe Theatres summer production of Cymbeline.
To evaluate the workshops we are using a frame-
work for achievement based on the work of Brown
(1996) and Grove (1998). This is the evaluation form
for Nicole, who is 12 years old and has high support
needs including a dual sensory impairment:
I will roar, that I will do any mans
heart good to hear me; I will roar,
that I will make the duke say, Let
him roar again, let him roar again.
... I will roar you as gently as any
sucking dove; I will roar you as
twere any nightingale.
Dark night, that from the eye his
function takes,
The ear more quick of
apprehension makes;
Wherein it doth impair the seeingsense,
It pays the hearing double
recompense.
So we grew together,
Like to a double cherry, seeming
parted,
But yet an union in partition;
Two lovely berries moulded on
one stem;
So, with two seeming bodies, but
one heart.
Reflections
LINGUISTICSNARROW INPERSPECTIVEHUMAN COMMUNICATION: ALINGUISTIC APPROACHGraham WilliamsonSpeechmarkISBN 0 86388 236 6 25.95The intended target audience for this text
includes professionals, teachers, carers and stu-
dents. It addresses human communication
from a linguistic perspective, including lan-
guage acquisition, language use, semantics,
grammar, phonetics and phonology.
Although most aspects of communication
were covered, the content tended to be
quite narrow in perspective, giving little con-
sideration to areas such as bilingualism, signlanguage and written language.
This book would be difficult for non-special-
ist readers to get into, as some sections tend-
ed to be technical in terms of written style
and terminology. Some quite good chapters
would be a suitable resource for profession-
als giving presentations, but for students this
would be better suited as a supplementary
text.
Betty Martin is a speech and language therapy
student at UCE, Birmingham.
LANGUAGEGENERALLY FUNKYTIME TO SING! (CD)The Centre for Creative PlayBlack Sheep Press (UK Distributor)12.00This CD has 26 traditional songs mostly, but
not all, familiar. The words are helpfully
enclosed.
Although sung at a slower pace than usual,
other features - the use of Sesame Street style
funny accents, occasionally quite uncomfort-
able phrasings, extra verses and potentially
confusing word changes (Head, Tummy, Knees
& Toes) - makes a few songs difficult and some-times irritating to listen to. However there is a
nice mix of adult and childrens voices on cer-
tain tracks.
The music is generally funky and interesting,
but some of the introductions and refrains
are long and potentially boring for those
with short attention spans.
When it worked I enjoyed singing along with
ohhh the okey cokey at the top of my lungs.
Unfortunately it didnt happen often enough
for me to recommend this as a must have.
A very good idea, but still needs some work.
Marion Hall is a speech and language thera-
pist working in Newcastle upon Tyne for the
community paediatric service.
Readers of our version of A Midsummer Nights
Dream may be interested to know that the
workshop materials have also been used in school
classrooms as well as onstage at the Globe
Theatre. Apart from the appropriate communica-
tion aids, the workshops only need a parachute, a
glittery blanket, a drum, and staff enthusiasm, to
be done anywhere.
Keith Park is an Advisory Teacher for Sense in
Greenwich and Lewisham, tel. 0771-502-6354,email: [email protected].
ReferencesBrown, E. (1996) RE For All. London: David
Fulton Publishers.
Grove, N. (1998) Literature For All. London:
David Fulton Publishers.
Levin, B. (1983) Enthusiasms. London: Curtis
Brown Ltd.
Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society: Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Nicole
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
9/32SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 2002 7
reviews
EWS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r e v i e w s
AUTISM
DONT BORROW IT, BUY IT!AUTISM WITH SEVERE LEARNING DIFFICULTIESDr Rita JordanSouvenir Press ISBN 0 298 63599 9 9.99This excellent, straightforward guide to an extremely complex
area will be an asset to therapists working in the field.It refers largely to work with children and young people, but
there is a good chapter on transition to adult life and a chap-
ter on helping adults with autism to lead a productive life.
There is a useful section on sources of help.
Dr Jordan wears her considerable learning lightly and express-
es herself well in an eminently readable and practical book.
Dont borrow it, buy it!
Jane Neil-McLachlan is the Adult Autism Co-ordinator with
Lothian Primary Care NHS Trust.
LANGUAGEVERY CLEAR AND
EXCELLENT VALUEDEVELOPING LANGUAGE (AMETACOGNITIVE APPROACH TOTEACHING GRAMMAR ANDMEANING)Wendy RinaldiNFER-NelsonManual 1: from before first wordsto word combinations (10 monthsto 21/2 years)Manual 2: grammatical elements,sentence level and beyond (21/2 to 7years)75 + VAT each / 137+VAT for
both manualsThis programme is for children who have
delayed or disordered language, with
emphasis on the development of seman-
tics and grammar and some early prag-
matic skills. It can be implemented by
speech and language therapists and their
assistants (supervision or training may be
needed) and teachers, and is aimed at a
group size of five to six children.
There is much emphasis on listening,
watching, thinking and understanding
and in building up processing skills
toward the ultimate goal of consolidated
sentence construction. The skills learnedare intended to be cumulative.
To provide some answers to perennial time
constraint problems, both books contain:
copiable session planning and record
sheets
pictures to support individual lessons
preparation notes re-equipment
abundant, well thought out exercises to
demonstrate how the different elements
in language work, their meanings, and
graded steps to develop language
processing, comprehension and use.
The focus on a metacognitive approach
throughout the levels also appealed
greatly.
The programme has potential for groups
with preschool children who have not yet
learned to use language, through to
those with tail end grammar delays. It
will also appeal to teaching staff from
the writing point of view.
Very clear, and excellent value.
Kareen Cairns and Claire Blandford, senior
speech and language therapists (language
disorder) work for Lanarkshire Healthcare
Trust providing outreach support from a
Primary Mainstream language unit Base
and clinical / Mainstream Peripatetic sup-
port respectively.
VOICE
CD PARTICULARLY USEFULTHE ACCENT METHOD (A RATIONAL VOICE
THERAPY IN THEORY & PRACTICE)Kirsten Thyme-Frokjaer & Borge Frokjaer-JensenSpeechmark ISBN 0 86388 272 2 25.95The book covers four areas: history and principles; anatomy,
physiology and acoustics of phonation; teaching the method;
and acoustic and physiological measurements. The section on
teaching, although short, is extremely practical and describes
fully the dynamic approach of the method. However, I would
have liked to see some sample case presentations and felt the
writing style was rather wordy.
It represents good value for money but should not be consid-
ered to be a substitute for the intensive training courses run
by the authors.
Lynn Busby is a specialist speech and language therapist
(voice) within the Ulster Hospitals and Community Trust.
ASSESSMENT
VERSATILE, STRAIGHTFORWARDAND ATTRACTIVEPHONOLOGICAL SCREENINGASSESSMENTNeil Stevens and Deborah IslesSpeechmark ISBN: 0 86388 273 036.00Ages: Child to AdultThis test is versatile, straightforward and attractive.
The vocabulary is appropriate from Nursery age
upwards. The pictures are clear and, being
coloured photographs, not babyish. The 32 indi-
vidual picture format means a variety of presenta-
tions can be used, and there are helpful sugges-
tions catering for differing levels of cooperation
and attention...and avoiding tedium for the thera-
pist. The photocopiable score sheets are compact
but have adequate space, plus a useful section on
phonological processes with age norms. The items
are listed alphabetically - a sensible follow-through
to presenting the pictures in differing orders. Most
initial and final consonants are covered and practi-
cally all vowels and diphthongs.
Good value.
Fran Neale is a specialist speech and language
therapist in phonology and dyspraxia in
Norwich.
VOICEQUICK REFERENCE EASYGREENE AND MATHIESONS THE VOICEAND ITS DISORDERS (6TH EDITION)Lesley MathiesonWhurr ISBN 1 86156 196 2 29.50The long awaited 6th edition of this classic
British voice textbook will not disappoint.
Massively extended and updated it is almost
double the length of the 5th edition, but man-
ages to cover all aspects of voice clearly and
without overwhelming the reader.
A clear outline of normal voice leads on to an
excellent and very comprehensive section on
voice pathology. The presentation and classifica-
tion of voice disorders is especially well
described. The voice therapy section begins with
a clear and thoughtful overview from initial con-sultation to outcome and discharge.
Principles and techniques are clearly described.
Throughout, boxed in tables and summaries
make quick reference easy. My student and I
were able to look up both straightforward and
unusual voice disorders and decide on appropri-
ate treatment approaches. The typeface is clear
and the book is well indexed.
It is excellent value for money and should be on
every voice therapists bookshelf.
Christine Mills is a speech and language thera-
pist working for Lincolnshire Healthcare Trust at
Pilgrim Hospital, Boston.
MUTISMLOTS OF PRACTICAL EXAMPLES AND IDEASSELECTIVE MUTISM RESOURCE MANUALMaggie Johnson & Alison WintgensSpeechmark ISBN 0 86388 280 3 37.50Although a rare condition, some practical advice on the man-
agement of children with selective mutism is essential and this
manual fulfils that need while being excellent value for money.
The theoretical section is easy to read and therefore useful to
parents and professionals. We found the Frequently Asked
Questions useful in the early stages of identification and gave
the parent information sheet later on. The assessment is thor-
ough with photocopiable parent and child interviews and there
is guidance on facilitation of other standardised assessments if
gaining the childs cooperation is difficult. The section on
reaching a diagnosis, which includes contra-indications, is par-
ticularly useful.
Most of the manual is concerned with management of thechild, both day to day advice and a systematic treatment pro-
gramme. It includes lots of practical examples and ideas but
will be a big time commitment for those involved.
Nevertheless, an excellent resource.
Carole Davies is clinical leader for speech and language ther-
apy services at Solihull Primary Care Trust.
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
10/32
collaboration
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 20028
CAN, the national educational charity for children with speech and language difficulties, started work-
ing with NHS Trusts and local education authorities over a decade ago to put some of the experience and
expertise gained in its special schools into action for the benefit of younger children. At this time the
development of I CAN speech and language nurseries was largely initiated in response to anecdotal evi-
dence from teachers and speech and language therapists in the field. Experienced professionals were
saying that they could identify children with persistent speech and language difficulties, who were likely to
require some type of special educational provision as a result, at nursery age (usually three to four years), but
were unable to provide appropriate provision until statutory school age, the few existing speech and language
nurseries in existence at this time providing notable exceptions. Consequently, speech and language therapists
reported, these children were often long-term members of clinic caseloads, and only started to make signifi-
I
if you want models for early
intervention
could work morecollaboratively
think intensive jointprovision would be tooexpensive
Read this The early
interventiongap -can we fix it?(Yes, I CAN!)
In Alex Halls
experience, most
therapists assume that
specialist educational
placements for
preschool children
with persistent speech
and language
difficulties would have
good outcomes butbe too expensive to
provide. Evaluation of
I CANs pioneering
Early Years Centres
indicates otherwise,
and Alex argues it isnow time for us to
put our money where
our mouth is - and
shift resources out
of the clinic.
Picture from an I CAN Early Years Centre
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
11/32SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 2002 9
collaboration
cant progress once placed in language unit provi-
sion at four or five years old. Concern was also
expressed about the likelihood of these children
developing secondary difficulties with behaviour,
literacy and social skills, which might have been
prevented with appropriate early intervention.
Building on this work, I CAN launched an ambi-
tious Early Years Development Programme in
1999 with three major parts:1.The development of 20 Early Years Centres for
the provision of integrated education and
speech and language therapy throughout the
United Kingdom. (By April 2002, 13 will have
been opened or approved.)
2.The rigorous evaluation of I CAN Centres in
comparison to other early years provision for
children with speech and language difficulties.
3.The development of an Accreditation Scheme,
which would identify key features of high quality
effective service provision and set the standard
for this specialist area. This will be launched at
I CANs National Conference, 4th March 2002.
Highly significant contributionA recently completed study, undertaken by James
Law (City University) and Julie Dockrell (Institute
of Education) on behalf of I CAN (part funded by
the Department of Health and the John Ellerman
foundation) makes a highly significant contribu-
tion to the evaluation component of this pro-
gramme, and is supported and reinforced by
ongoing evaluations carried out by practitioners
at other I CAN Early Years Centres. The objectives
of the study were to:
a) provide a description of I CAN Early Years
Centre provision contrasted with national
preschool educational provision
b) analyse changes in the language and social
skills of children attending I CAN Centres in
comparison to a group of children receiving
local speech and language therapy and
preschool education
c) provide an initial economic evaluation of the
services received by children attending I CAN
Centres and the comparison group.
Subjects came from two I CAN Early Years
Centres (figure 1); local NHS trusts wereapproached to recruit comparison group children.
The children were assessed
and parents were interviewed
immediately prior to the
intervention, immediately
after the intervention, and six
months after initial assess-
ment. Language, cognition
and social development mea-
sures were collected for a
total of 90 children with pri-
mary language difficulties, 58
of whom came from the I CAN
Centres. The mean age of the
children (in both groups) was
3;4 years. The economic evaluation was carried
out by comparing the costs of the I CAN Centres
with those of NHS speech and language services
and preschool education as determined from
national data.
The evaluation study showed that children who
attended the I CAN Centres made greater
improvements, relative to the comparison group,
in the following areas:
productive vocabulary
language comprehension scores as measured by
the verbal subtests of the British Abilities Scales
(Elliot et al, 1996)
adaptive and social behaviour
Positive changes were also noticed by parents
and teachers, relative to the comparison group:
parents reported the adaptive and social behaviours
of the I CAN Centre children to have significantly
improved (expressive, compliant and pro-social
behaviour) parents reported a decline in disruptive behaviour
for children who attended the I CAN Centres
teachers indicated that there had been a significant
improvement in the childrens compliance and
pro-social behaviour.
I CAN Early Years Centres, including the two which
participated in the research, share a model with fea-
tures that were not seen in the services received by
children in the comparison group. It is not a pre-
scriptive model; indeed, it is operationalised differ-
ently in all the Centres to accommodate local fac-
tors. Variation is often a result of policies such as
school entry age, complementary services - for
example, how much support the children will
receive when and if they return to a local main-
stream setting - and geography, where long travelling
distances may mean attendance is for fewer sessions.
The model and associated good practice are being
disseminated, by I CAN, through a training cascade
and accompanying materials during 2002, as well as
through the I CAN Accreditation scheme.
The model has the following features, which
could usefully be replicated in other services:
1. The integrated delivery of speech and language
therapy and preschool education, achieved
through collaborative work of teachers and
therapists who together plan, deliver and monitor
programmes. Of particular significance is the
joint preparation of Individual Education Plansand matching of activities into Early Learning
Goals.
2. Parental involvement (frequent
communication, child specific
advice, parent workshops).
3. Participation in a mainstream nursery
environment (the I CAN provision is
either part of a mainstream class or
attended concurrently with a
mainstream placement supported by
the I CAN staff).
4. Outreach activities to support the
children in any concurrent placement
and through the transition into
subsequent educational provision.
5. The Law & Dockrell research found the I CAN
Centres to excel in all dimensions of the Early
Childhood Rating Scales (Harms et al, 1998)
apart from space and furnishings. The one I CAN
Centre which scored poorly in this area has
since been relocated. Specifically, they noted:
good use of language, reasoning and interaction
skills, for example staff child interactions
individual learning needs described for the
children were of a particularly high standard
emphasised social/pragmatic tasks such as
greeting and departing
excellent use of books and pictures to facilitate
the language skills of the children.
Positive changes
were also
noticed by parents
and teachers,
relative to the
comparison group
Figure 1 - Different models of provision
I CAN Centre A
children enter between the ages of 2;8-3;3 years ten week programme for up to sixteen children per intake (eight morning, eight afternoon) programme carried out within mainstream nursery setting, with children spread through
the nursery groups replaces attendance at playgroup or, for a few children, other nursery staffing: speech and language therapist, SEN nursery teacher, nursery nurse (all full-time),
nursery nurse outreach worker (four days per week), educational psychologist (three sessions
per intake, one to attend admissions panel and two for advice and support to staff and parents) the therapist, teacher and nursery nurses work as a team to support children within the
nursery classrooms and carry out the individual programmes. Any one of them can carryout the group activities.
I CAN Centre B
children enter between the ages of 3;3-4;6 years six week intensive intervention programme for up to sixteen children per intake (eight
morning, eight afternoon) intervention in a segregated area away from the mainstream nursery, in addition to the
placement each child has at a mainstream nursery direct contact is four days per week with one day used for outreach, administration,
planning and training team works with childs concurrent mainstream placement staffing: speech and language therapist, SEN nursery teacher, SEN special support assistant
(all full-time), educational psychologist (one day per week) the staff work as a team and interchange in the carrying out of the big group activities, as
well as other functions there are three staff for up to eight children for the majority of group activities
Both Centres provide high levels of outreach to subsequent mainstream nursery / school placements.
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
12/32
collaboration
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 200210
PrioritisingWhere a model of service delivery showing these
features is available, the Law & Dockrell research
provides clues to assist in appropriately selecting
and prioritising children for placement:
Children with the most severe
language comprehension difficul-
ties at initial assessment whoattended I CAN Centres made the
greatest gains in this area, rela-
tive to the comparison group, and
are therefore ideal candidates.
Both at baseline and at six
month follow-up there was no
significant difference between
the Centre and comparison chil-
dren in intelligibility. Using the
Goldman-Fristoe Test of
Articulation (1986), both groups
had similar improvements in the
number of items they attempted
to name and the number of
sounds produced correctly. This suggests childrenwhose primary difficulty is with phonology should
not be given priority for these two I CAN Early
Years Centres.
Whilst the long-term financial benefits of effective
provision (reduced need for specialist support and
education, reduction of secondary difficulties and
parental and child well-being) may be difficult to
evaluate, the direct costs of delivering the model
of service provision described and the comparative
costs of a clinic based speech and language service
coupled with a mainstream preschool education
are easier to measure. The Law & Dockrell
research has provided a useful first step for studies
in this area, although the wide differences in levelsof speech and language therapy provided in clinic
based services and issues around costs to parents
in accessing services require further investigation.
SurprisingWhen I talk to therapists, there is a general presump-
tion that this type of intensive provision - where a
therapist, teacher and assistant / nursery nurse are
allocated to a relatively small number of children
- will be expensive relative to provision of therapy
in a clinic setting. The true picture is therefore
perhaps surprising.
The costs over one year for comparison children
receiving separate NHS speech and language ther-
apy and preschool education provision (obtained
from national data) were analysed and compared
to those receiving the integrated I CAN service.
The provision to the comparison group was more
expensive than the provision to the I CAN service
group for one I CAN Centre, whilst the other I CAN
Centre was moderately more expensive. Given
the long-term benefits of the I CAN provi-
sion, and their likely cost implications, I CAN
Early Years Centres offer a relatively costefficient service, therefore redeployment of
staff from a clinic setting to an integrated
early years setting should be considered by
speech and language therapy managers.
It may be that the greatest obstacle to
the development of integrated education
and therapeutic provision for children in
the early years is the organisation and man-
agement of the two services, split as they
are between the NHS and education
authorities. The new flexibilities for com-
missioning, funding, and managing services
permitted through the 1999 Health Act for
England and Wales provide an opportunity to begrasped for the benefit of children. In the mean-
time, based on these findings, my advice to thera-
pists working with preschool children with persis-
tent speech and language difficulties is to work col-
laboratively with teachers in early years settings to:
Assess, so that:
both have access to a fuller picture of the childs
strengths and needs.
Plan, so that:
the child has one integrated plan which furthers
both their language development and access to
the curriculum
priorities are agreed rather than conflicting.
Intervene, so that:
the therapist understands the demands of the
1. Grasp the opportunity provided by new funding flexibilities and I CANs
training and Accreditation Scheme to set up integrated early years services.
2. Respond creatively to local policies, provision and geography.
3. Prioritise children with severe language comprehension difficulties for
collaborative work with nursery or playgroup staff.
4. Assess, plan, intervene and monitor collaboratively.
5. Ensure parents receive consistent information and are involved at all stages.
Five steps to better practice
Children withthe most severe
language
comprehension
difficulties...
made the
greatest gains
in this area
curriculum and preschool environment, and the
teacher understands what are appropriate
strategies, language demands and expectations
intervention is consistent
different skills and knowledge are exploited
the time a child is exposed to appropriately targeted
work is maximised
intervention occurs in a naturalistic setting
opportunities for reinforcement and generalisationare increased.
Monitor, so that
change or additional information is rapidly
known by all
intervention can rapidly reflect changes.
Taken as a whole, this collaboration ensures that
parents and other professionals can receive con-
sistent information.
Alex Hall is I CANs Director of Services
Development. Further information on I CANs Early
Years Centres, the new Accreditation Scheme, the
training cascade and the Law & Dockrell research
from I CAN, 4 Dyers Buildings, Holborn, LondonEC1N 2QP, tel. 0870 010 40 66, www.ican.org.uk.
ReferencesElliot, C.D., Smith, P. & McCollock, K. (1996) British
Ability Scales (BAS II). Slough: NFER-Nelson.
Goldman, R. & Fristoe, M. (1986) Goldman Fristoe
Test of Articulation. Circle Pines USA: American
Guidance Service Inc.
Harms, T., Clifford, R.M. & Cryer, D. (1998) Early
Childhood Environmental Rating Scales: Revised
edition. New York: Teachers College Press.
Resources For information on the1999 Health Act, see
www.doh.gov.uk/jointunit/index.htm.
CORRECTION
Figure 1 in Ruth Paradices
article Putting partnership
into practice (Winter 2001)
should have appeared as
shown here. Apologies for
any confusion caused.
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
13/32SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 2002 11
further reading
STROKEWhelan, K. (2001) Inadequate fluid intakes in dysphagic acute stroke.
Clin Nutr20 (5) 423-8.
The fluid intakes of 24 patients with dysphagic acute stroke were stud-
ied prospectively to evaluate the effect of disability, the ward speciality
and the type of fluid given on oral intake. Patients were randomly
assigned to receive powder-thickened fluids or ready prepared pre-thickened fluids and parenteral, enteral and oral fluid intakes, urine
output, clinical sequelae and the frequency of requests for biochemical
measures of hydration were recorded for a maximum of fourteen days.
Mean thickened fluid intake was 455 ml/d (SEM+/-70) resulting in the
use of an extra 742 ml/d (+/-132) of supplementary fluids. The resulting
total intake was inadequate due to insufficient volumes being given for
too short a period. Patients not on specialist stroke units who received
pre-thickened fluids drank almost 100% more than those on powder-
thickened fluids (P=0.04). The results demonstrate that fluid intakes in
dysphagic acute stroke are insufficient to achieve hydration require-
ments. Hospital staff must ensure adequate fluid intakes in patients at
risk of dehydration, through both an adequate prescription and provi-
sion of supplementary fluids.
FURTHERREADING
This regular featureaims to provide
information about
articles in otherjournals whichmay be of interest
to readersThe Editor has
selected thesesummaries from aSpeech & Language
Database compiledby Biomedical
Research IndexingEvery article in
over thirty journalsis abstracted for
this databasesupplemented by a
monthly scan ofMedline to pick outrelevant articles
from others
To subscribe to theIndex to Recent
Literature on
Speech &Language contactChristopher Norris
Downe BaldersbyThirsk NorthYorkshire YO PP
tel fax
Annual rates are
CDs (for Windows):
Institution Individual
Printed version:Institution
Individual
Cheques are
payable toBiomedical
Research Indexing
g
g
g
g
AACBondy, A. & Frost, L. (2001) The Picture
Exchange Communication System [review].
Behav Modif25 (5) 725-44.
The Picture Exchange Communication System
(PECS) is an alternative/augmentative communi-
cation system that was developed to teach func-
tional communication to children with limited
speech. The approach is unique in that it teach-
es children to initiate communicative interac-tions within a social framework. This article
describes the advantages to implementing PECS
over traditional approaches. The PECS training
protocol is described wherein children are
taught to exchange a single picture for a
desired item and eventually to construct pic-
ture-based sentences and use a variety of attrib-
utes in their requests. The relationship of
PECSs implementation to the development of
speech in previously nonvocal students is
reviewed. (26 References)
DYSPHAGIASmith, M.E., Berke, G.S., Gray, S.D., Dove, H. & Harnsberger, R. (2001)Clicking in the throat: cinematic fiction or surgical fact? Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127 (9) 1129-31.
The complaint of a clicking in the throat when swallowing is uncommon
but very discomforting and painful for those who experience it. It is
such an unusual complaint that symptoms may be dismissed as psy-
chogenic because a cause for the problem may not be readily apparent.
We present a series of 11 cases in which all patients had an audible click-
ing or popping noise in the throat associated with neck and throat pain
when swallowing or turning the neck. The most helpful diagnostic pro-
cedure was careful examination and palpation of the neck while the
patient swallowed to localize the side and source of the clicking.
Laryngeal computed tomographic (CT) scans helped in some cases to
demonstrate thyroid-cartilage and/or vertebral body asymmetry. Each
case was treated with surgery of the neck and larynx to trim the portion
of the thyroid cartilage causing the clicking. In most cases the superiorcornu of the thyroid cartilage projected posteriorly and medially.
Surgery was successful in all cases to eliminate the symptoms. Though
an uncommon complaint, our experience suggests that the clicking
throat is a surgically treatable problem.
FRAGILE XRoberts, J.E., Mirrett, P. & Burchinal, M. (2001)
Receptive and expressive communication
development of young males with fragile X
syndrome.Am J Ment Retard106 (3) 216-30.
We prospectively examined the developmental
trajectories of receptive and expressive commu-
nication skills of 39 young males, 20 to 86
months of age, with fragile X syndrome. Eightshowed features characteristic of autism.
Children were tested one to three times using a
standardized language test. They showed
marked delays in language development, but
substantial individual variability. Participants
acquired expressive language skills more slowly
than receptive language over time, gaining
receptive language at about half the rate
expected for typically developing children and
expressive language at one third the rate. Both
cognitive skills and autistic characteristics of the
young males with fragile X syndrome related to
receptive and expressive communication devel-
opment, but neither predicted the discrepan-cies between expressive and receptive language
acquisition over time.
STAMMERINGSnyder, G.J. (2001) Exploratory research in the measurement and modi-
fication of attitudes toward stuttering.J Fluency Disord26 (2) 149-58,
quiz 159-60.
This study measured changes in graduate speech-language pathology
clinicians attitudes after they had viewed either a factual video demon-
strating the fluency-evoking effects of altered auditory feedback (AAF)
or an emotional documentary showing the negative social conse-
quences of stuttering on a young girl. Twenty one subjects completedsurveys before and after viewing the emotional documentary, and
another group of 34 subjects completed surveys before and after seeing
a brief video on the amelioration of stuttering by AAF at both normal
and fast speaking rates. The post test results showed that both docu-
mentaries produced few changes in perceptions of stuttering, and the
changes that were produced were subtle. The results can not be consid-
ered as successful in modifying graduate clinicians perceptions of stut-
tering to better resemble the population described by prior psychologi-
cal and stuttering research. Past, present and future methodologies
attempting to change negative stereotypes of stuttering are discussed.
VOICEComins, J. (2001) Do you need to be trained tospeak? SingerApr-May, 25-6.
This article discusses the importance of the
speaking voice on- and off-stage, particularly in
singers who experience problems with talking
due to inefficient use of the laryngeal muscles
when speaking. When singers try to talk in the
same way that they sing, they use too much thy-
roid tilt, affecting voice quality. The comments
and advice of voice specialists, singing and
drama teachers and speech and language ther-
apists are recorded, together with tips for a
more efficient speaking voice.
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
14/32
early intervention
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 200212
ver the last five years, the number
of referrals to speech and language
therapists in Ayrshire and Arran of
very young children presenting
with eating/drinking related diffi-
culties but with no specific medical diagnosis has
increased. However, working in the field of special
needs, it has come to our attention that, despite our
medical and nursing colleagues recognising the
appropriateness of referral of these children to ourservice, our involvement is often delayed. The intro-
duction of normal eating/drinking developmental
processes is therefore delayed and, in many cases,
increases already immature patterns of speech
development. In addition, late referral often pro-
longs the necessity of our involvement which adds
to the financial and resource burden of the service.
A Partnership in Developmental Care confer-
ence focused our thoughts and led us to review the
literature regarding developmental care and inves-
tigate how and to what extent the principles of this
model of care are incorporated into Neonatal
Intensive Care Units. It prompted us to consider
extending our current pathways of care to incorpo-
rate earlier intervention for our pre-Nursery clientgroup, many of whom were pre-term infants. (For
the purposes of this article, pre-term infants are
defined as those born before 30 weeks gestation
but not less than 24 weeks, weighing less than 1250
gms and mechanically ventilated within three
hours of delivery and for more than 24 hours in the
first 48 hours of life (Als et al, 1994.))
During the 60s and 70s much of the caregiving in
Neonatal Intensive Care Units focused on providing
care in a stimulation enriched environment in an
attempt to ameliorate developmental delays and
facilitate achievement of specific developmentalmilestones. Much research and reporting followed,
documenting the effects of such environments
including frequent handling and overstimulation
(Long et al, 1980; Gagnon 1989). As premature
infants do not have the neurodevelopment to
cope, they respond negatively to frequent han-
dling, displaying increased episodes of hypoxemia
(Long et al, 1980). Excessive noise causes increased
blood pressure, apnoea and bradycardia (Gagnon,
1989). In the last 10-15 years nursing practices
have altered in response to this evidence.
Values basedPioneering work by Hiedeles Als (Als et al, 1994)
focused on investigating the effectiveness of indi-vidualised developmental care in reducing med-
ical and neurodevelopmental sequelae for the
Making the
case for change
if referrals to your service
are being delayed introducing change is
slow and difficult
you aim for evidencebased practice
Read this
O
1. LightingThe pre-term infant isborn from a darkenedwomb into an environmentwhere the light iscontinuous, high leveland fluorescent.Infants can spendmonths exposed tothese conditions.Researchers have
hypothesised thatcontinuous light canresult in endocrinechanges, variations inbiological rhythms and
sleep deprivation(Jorgensen, 1993) and
studies have foundreduced incidence ofretinopathy when lightingwithin the incubator isreduced. In view ofthese factors, units nowreduce general lighting,cover incubators and
shield babies eyesduring procedures.
2. NoiseBritish SafetyStandards of 60decibels inside anincubator havebeen shown to befrequentlyexceeded inneonatal intensivecare units (Jack,
2000). Excessive
noise can damagedelicate auditory
structures andcause adverse
physiological andbehaviouralreactions, includinghypoxia andincreased intra-cranial pressure, so
staff are madeaware of theimportance ofreducing noiselevels within their
sphere of practice(Jack, 2000).
3. Care GivingStaff areencouraged to
provide carewhich makesuse of andenhancesinfants
specificstrengths anddiminishes
theirvulnerabilities,(Als et al,1994) and torecognise
stressbehavioursand regulatorybehaviours ofthe pre-terminfant.
4. Positioning of Pre-termInfant
Appropriate positioning isparamount in facilitatingneurobehavioural developmentand preventing posturaldeformities and delay inmotor development. Acontained mid-line flexed
supported position (Jack,2000) allows hand to mouth
activity, self soothing and selfregulatory behaviour as couldbe achieved in utero.Containment is an importantfactor in developing the pre-term infants feeling of
security and calmingbehaviours (Fleisher et al,1995) resulting in increasedweight gain and the pre-terminfant requiring lessmedication. Short et al(1996) showed that this
positioning technique canenhance neuromusculardevelopment of the very lowbirth weight infant.
5. HandlingAn importantfactor is sleep.Frequent handdisturbs sleep aleads to less wgain and decre
state regulatio(Jorgensen, 199Emphasis is plaon minimal
handling,promotingrestfulness,containmentduring and afte
stressfulprocedures,structuring sleeand feeding in
synchronisationwith the infant
sleep and wakecycles, individuacluster care andgiving attentiotimings (Jorgens1993; Als et al, 1
very low birth weight infant. This encourages
assessment of the individual infants ability to
cope with excessive stimulation and provides the
caregiver with information to modify each
infants environment and treatment strategies
(Jorgensen, 1993). Hence, Developmental
Supportive Care is not a product, or technologi-
cally based; rather, it is values based (Jack, 2000).
Developmental Supportive Care
is individualised, not consistently applied is derived from behavioural rather than scientific
reasoning
is complex not simple in its application
requires the involvement of multidisciplinary
teams including speech and language therapists
and physiotherapists.
Outcomes may not be readily identifiable but sig-
nificant positive outcomes of individualised devel-
opmental supportive care (Jorgensen 1993) have
been detailed as -
fewer days on the ventilator
earlier feeding success
reduction in the number of complications
shorter hospital stay
improved neurodevelopmental outcomes duringthe first 18 months of life.
Als et al (1994) investigated in some detail
Figure 1 - main characteristics of developmental supportive care
Anne Scott
Elspeth Mair
-
7/28/2019 Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Spring 2002
15/32SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE SPRING 2002 13
early intervention
whether there were improvements in medical and
neurodevelopmental outcomes when pre-term
infants were either cared for in a traditional man-
ner or the care followed developmental support-
ive care pathways. The pre-term infants were
assessed at two weeks and again at
nine months after expected date of
confinement. Prior to discharge the
developmental supportive care pre-
term infants demonstrated a signifi-cant improvement in the positive
outcomes detailed above. At two
weeks after the expected date of
confinement, the developmental
supportive care pre-term infants dis-
played improved symmetry of orien-
tation and motor performances,
modulation of tone, movement and
posture and a significantly lower
number of abnormal reflexes. At
nine months after the expected date
of confinement, significantly higher scores were
achieved on the Bayley Scales of Infant
Development and Mental Developmental Index
(Bayley, 1969) for the developmental supportivecare pre-term infants. The largest differences
were found in the control of gross and fine motor
Other professionals often recognise the value of speech and language
therapy but dont make referrals as early as we would like. Elspeth Mair
andAnne Scottscour the literature for evidence on best practice with
pre-term infants and use their findings to argue for earlier speech andlanguage therapy involvement in the multidisciplinary team.
7. Parents RoleWhen a babys condition is stable parents are then encouraged totake a more active role in their babys care. Principles ofdevelopmental supportive care are explained to them and parentstaught how to hold and comfort their baby, using swaddling andcontainment during care giving (Jack, 2000).Parent participation may also include Kangaroo Care. This is the
placing of infants, usually wearing nothing, on the parents chestunder the parents clothing. Kangaroo Care has been shown (Gale& VandenBerg, 1998) to have very positive outcomes for both thebabies and parents. Babies have shown more stable heart rates,
respiration rates, oxygen saturation, less apnoea, better stateregulation and greater conservation of calories. Parents havereported increased confidence and self-esteem. Kangaroo Care isoften cited as an advantageous practice for infants who will bebreastfed. It affords the infant the sensory interaction of touchand smell within the environment of the breast (Als et al, 1994).Not only can the parent and baby feel each others heart beats butthe baby becomes familiar with the smell of breastmilk. Gale &VandenBerg (1998) also describe the improvements achieved wheninitiating and maintaining breastfeeding - breastfeeding beginsearlier and lactation is prolonged, resulting in higher rates ofbreastfeeding at discharge.The sensory interaction, closeness and intimacy achieved duringKangaroo Care develops feelings of security and trust, aidscommunication between parent and child, and leads to facilitedorganisation of regulatory systems (autonomic, motor, state).
Non-Nutritive Suckingon-nutritive sucking is used within some neonatal intensive care units asart of developmental supportive care with the aim of reducing oralypersensitivity. As these pre-term infants are generally tube fed, they are notfforded the opportunity to suck nutritively. Non-nutritive sucking has beented as an effective practice to reduce stressors, facilitate progress and enablearlier discharge from hospital (Pickler et al, 1996; Field et al, 1982).ottle feeding can be a source of stress to pre-term infants and in recent timeson-nutritive sucking has been introduced as part of the developmentalupportive care within intensive care nurseries. Non-nutritive sucking istroduced five minutes prior to tube feeding in conjunction with appropriate
ositioning to facilitate hand to mouth activity. Jack (2000) reports that amoother transition from tube-feeding to oral feeding occurs when thisractice is in place.small developmental dummy is offered to pre-term infants during tubeeds in order to promote sucking and induce an inactive calm state. Infants
ffered dummies during tube feeds are said to average a greater weight gainer day, require fewer tube feeds, be ready to commence bottle feeding aboutree days earlier and leave hospital around eight days earlier (Field et al,
982).ome controversy remains regarding the use of dummies for infants who willubsequently be breastfed, as it is believed that this may lead to nippleonfusion (Lang, 1995). However, generally, most care professionals hold theew that non-nutritive sucking in pre-term infants contributes to increasedeight gain due to reduced restless activity and pro