Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment (SSRA) … UNCLASSIFIED Spectrum Supportability Risk...

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment (SSRA) ENGAGEMENT THEATER

SSRA Requirements

For Spectrum Dependent Systems

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Bottom Line Up Front • SSRAs and Equipment Spectrum Certification (ESC) are

two separate processes.

• The Requirements are established in Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 4650.01, January 9, 2009

• The SSRA form and format are provided in the Data Item Description (DID) DI-EMCS-81543; dtd 20120120

• The SC form and format are provided by El-Cid, Stepstone, and SCS

• Additional Content guidance is provided in the Joint Services SSRA Guide and service specific documents

2

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

A Process, Not an Event

Risk Identification

Risk Analysis

Risk Mitigation Planning

Risk Management Implementation

Risk Tracking

Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment

3

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

SSRA Requirements and Guidance • Equipment Certification and SSRA Requirements are drawn from: DoD Instruction 4650.01,

Policy and Procedures for Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

– Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and provides instructions for management and use of the electromagnetic spectrum

– Requires the submittal of an SSRA

• Enclosure 3, 2.b: “At a minimum, electromagnetic interference (EMI) and electromagnetic compatibility assessments shall be made…”

• Enclosure 3, 2.d: “ DoD Components' S-D system developers are encouraged to initiate the SSRA in order to help identify regulatory, technical, and operational risks while completing the appropriate stage of certification of spectrum support.”

• Each SSRA submission requires ALL 4 Components; an increase in what is depicted in DoDI 4650.01, Enclosure 3, Table 1.

• Acquisition Milestone requirements for SSRA and Frequency Allocation are specified in the Defense Acquisition System

– DoD Instruction 5000.02 “Operation of the Defense Acquisition System,” Table 2

• Guidance on the preparation of an SSRA is provided in the “Joint Services Guide for Development of an SSRA”

• Suggests format and content for an SSRA

• Expands on E3 assessment for an SSRA

• Expands on risk management

• Service Specific Requirements and Guidance

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

All electric or electronic systems shall be designed

to be mutually compatible with other equipment

in the expected operational EM environment

(DoDD 5000.01, DoDI 3222.03)

E3 Control shall be planned for and incorporated in

all DoD acquisitions (DoDI 3222.03)

Estimates or obligation of funds for the development or procurement of C-E systems should be withheld pending assurance of the availability of frequency support by the NTIA (OMB Circular A-11, NTIA Manual)

DD Form 1494 (Application for Frequency Allocation) shall be used to initiate and obtain spectrum certification (DoDI 4650.01, DFARS 235.071)

Law and Associated Regulations – OMB Circular A-11

– NTIA Manual

– DFARS 235.071

DoD Policy – CJCSI 3170.01, CJCSI 6212.01

– DoDD 5000.01 Enclosure 1, Para. E1.1.10

– DoDI 5000.02

– DoD Instruction 3222.03, 25 Aug 2014, DoD E3 Program

– DoD Instruction 4650.01, 09 Jan 2009, Management and Use of Radio Frequency Spectrum

Policies

5

E3/SS Policy

DoDI 5000.02: Relevant E3/SS Changes:

Table 3, Regulatory Requirements Applicable at Milestone (MS) B and C

Enclosure 4, Table 2-1/2-2: Spectrum Supportability required for Major and ACAT II and lower programs

DoDD 5000.01: E1.1.10. Information Superiority. Acquisition managers shall

provide U.S. Forces with systems and families of systems that are secure, reliable, interoperable, compatible with the electromagnetic spectrum environment, ...

[Encl 12] 11. SPECTRUM SUPPORTABILITY. For all electromagnetic spectrum-dependent systems, PMs shall comply with U.S. and host nation spectrum regulations…

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Servi ce SpectrumM anagem ent O f f i ce( s)

Joi nt / Nat i onalSSD Process

NTI A ( SPS)

M CEB ( ESG PW G )

Program Offi ce or Procuring Act i vi t y

( Program of Record, COTS, NDI , Non-Program of Record)

Spect rum Support abi l i ty Det ermi nat ion

Approval

Spect rum Support abi lit y Ri sk Assessment

Program O f f i ce or Procuri ng Act i vi t y

CJSCI 3170.01

CJSCI 6212.01

DOD 4630 series

E3 and spectrum supportability must be addressed in

CDD/CPD/TEMPs/ISPs

DODD 5000.01

DODI 5000.02

Acquisition Managers shall provide systems that are secure, reliable, interoperable,

and compatible with the electromagnetic spectrum environment

For all electromagnetic spectrum-dependent systems, PMs shall comply with U.S.

and host nation spectrum regulations.

DODI 3222.03

DODI 4650.01 DOD Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Program

Policy for the Management and Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum

Acquisition & Capabilities Regulations and Directives All derived from Title 47 US Code (statutory requirement)

11/5/2015 6

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

JCIDS /Acquisition System Spectrum Supportability (SS) Business Processes

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

8

DoDI 5000.02: Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

Frequency Allocation

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

9

Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment

DoDI 5000.02: Operation of the Defense Acquisition System

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

“Policy and Procedures for

Management and Use of the

Electromagnetic Spectrum”

Proper management required for operations

involving spectrum dependent systems

Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessments

• Required on all Spectrum-Dependent (S-D) systems.

• Includes increasingly detailed regulatory, technical,

and operational assessments (to include EMC)

• Assessments and Mitigation Plans are Reviewed by

CIO or designate at MS A, B, and C, to determine

supportability

• Procedures specified at high level, recommended risk

assessment tasks included as attachment

• Certification in U.S. and Host Nations handled

separately – doesn’t hold up risk assessments

• PROBLEM: Format and Content requirements not

specified

10 I

DoD Instruction 4650.01 09 January 2009

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED


Para 4 Policy

e. For all S-D systems, DoD Components shall determine if there will be sufficient

spectrum to support operation of the system during its life cycle. In order to affect

design and procurement decisions, DoD Components shall:

(1) Identify spectrum-related risks as early as possible via spectrum supportability risk

assessments.

(2) Review these assessments at acquisition milestones.

(3) Manage the risks throughout the system’s lifecycle.”

Enclosure 2, Responsibilities

P5. HEADS OF THE DoD COMPONENTS. The Heads of the DoD Components shall:

b. Develop procedures to implement the policies in section 4 of the front matter of this

Instruction to include:

(4) Procedures to identify and mitigate, as early as possible, spectrum supportability risks

using spectrum supportability risk assessments.

11 I


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED


Enclosure 3, Procedures

P2. SPECTRUM SUPPORTABILITY RISK ASSESSMENTS (SSRAs)

a. DoD Components’ S-D system developers shall identify and mitigate regulatory, technical, and

operational spectrum supportability risks using suggested tasks in the appendix to this enclosure.

DoD Components’ S-D system developers shall increase the detail of these risk assessments as the

S-D system’s design matures.

b. DoD Components’ S-D system developers shall assess the risk for harmful interference with other

S-D systems and/or harmful radiation-related effects. At a minimum, electromagnetic interference

(EMI) and electromagnetic compatibility assessments shall be made (Reference (g)).

c. DoD Components’ S-D system developers shall manage spectrum supportability risks with other

developmental risks through systems engineering processes (Reference (i)).

d. DoD Components' S-D system developers are encouraged to initiate the SSRA in order to help

identify regulatory, technical, and operational risks while completing the appropriate stage of

certification of spectrum support.

e. Complex “family of systems” or “system-of-systems” may require more than one SSRA.

(but still one overarching SSRA for the FoS or SoS)

12 I


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• AR 5-12, Army Use of the Electromagnetic Spectrum, is the

guiding requirements document – Update to include new SSRA input expected in late 2015

• Contact ASMO for guidance and template

Army Requirements/Guidance

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• OPNAVINST 2400.2F, Electromagnetic Environmental Effects

and Spectrum Supportability Policy And Procedures – implements SSRA requirements per DoDI 4650.01.

– Revision G expected late CY 2015

• 2400.2G will include expanded SSRA guidance

• Contact NSMC for process, format and template guidance

Navy Requirements/Guidance

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Air Force Requirements/Guidance

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED 16

• Engineering Policy Letter 01-13

• Establishes Standard Operating Procedures

(SOP) for Standard Spectrum Risk

Assessment's (SSRA’s)

• Applicable to ACAT I-IV

• Encouraged for all levels in order to provide accurate

E3 and spectrum support.

• Is in keeping with DoD/SECNAV policy and MCO

2400.0

Marine Corps Requirements/Guidance

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Program objectives:

– Operational EMC for all DoD systems

– Built-in EMC vice after-the-fact remedies

– Common DoD-wide philosophies, approaches, and TTPs to preclude

unacceptable degradation from E3.

• Requires E3 control planning in all DoD acquisitions

• E3 and SS issues must be resolved to acceptable risk before

proceeding to next phase of acquisition

• Assigns functional responsibility to OSD, Joint Staff, DISA,

DSO, Services, DoD agencies, etc.

17 I

DoDI 3222.03 – DoD Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Program (25 Aug 2014)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Identify Regulatory, Operational, and Technical spectrum supportability (SS) and electromagnetic environmental effects (E3) Issues and assign risk level

• For each identified risk, there should be a risk mitigation measure identified

• Submitted through channels identified by each service

– Process typically includes Service Spectrum Management Office, with Chief Information Officer (CIO) review/approval and Spectrum Supportability Determination (SSD).

• SSRA required when the acquisition includes a S-D system or equipment, including commercial item (CI) and non-developmental item (NDI).

• Initiate the SSRA while completing the appropriate stage of equipment spectrum certification (ESC) process

SSRA Basics

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Complex “system-of-systems” (SoS), “family-of-systems” (FoS), and/or Platforms require: – One SSRA for the SoS/FoS/Platform to include ALL, imbedded S-D

equipment – Individual SSRA’s are required for each S-D Equipment (Exception: S-D

equipments, with Stage 4 approval, are “Grandfathered” in; unless, the S-D equipment is receiving an upgrade/modification that affects its EM characteristics.)

– Regulatory, Technical, Operational, and E3 Components are REQUIRED for each SSRA

• Contact Service, SMO early for guidance – What spectrum/frequency band(s) should be used – What SSRA(s) is/are required

• Detail and scope of each SSRA depends on: – the item’s entry point into the Defense Acquisition System (DAS) – its complexity – the intended operational environment – the maturity of the design

SSRA Basics (Continued)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Services Guide

• SSRA Content Guidance • Components

– Regulatory Content – Technical Contents – Operational Contents – E3 Assessment – Risk Assessment

• Submission Requirements • Guidance on Risk Classification • Format Guidance

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Front Cover • Introduction • Executive Summary • Regulatory Component of SSRA • Technical Component of SSRA • Operational Component of SSRA • E3 Assessment for SSRA • Conclusions • Recommendations • References

SSRA Report Format Joint Guidance Document Sept 2011/DI-EMCS-81543

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Services Guide for Development of an SSRA Final Draft, Sept 2011


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Addresses:

– ESC stage and status applicable to the DAS phase of the acquisition,

– HNC (Host Nation Coordination) Status

• With respect to the radio services authorized within the tables of allocation (TOAs) of the U.S. and intended Host Nation (HN)

• Responses in HNSWDO from the HNC processes.

SSRA Components Overview Regulatory


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Service Spectrum Management Office

• J/F-12 Data from processed ESC Requests – Frequency Assignment data (JSC Databases)

– MCEB/SPS Comments

– Resident at Service Spectrum Management Office

– JDAWS at the Defense Spectrum Office

– Stepstone/EL-CID/SCS searches

• NTIA Manual – ITU Tables

– Other web based allocation table resources

• Host Nation Status available in HNSWD-O from the DSO – InternaInternational Comments – Normally requires a completed, Stage

4, Spectrum Certification.

– Check www.efis.dk for operations in Europe

Data Requirements & Sources Regulatory Component

http://www.efis.dk/

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• ESC Request Submission does not ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements nor does it allow operation of systems…discuss frequency assignments versus ESC Requests.

• Make sure the planned spectrum use is allocated for the intended function…radio service and station class

• Look at all three ITU regions, not just US Allocations

• Be wary of the "age" of HSNWDO data (not real-time enough).

• For MS A look at existing systems with similar technical attributes

• Coordinate as early as possible with your service SMO

• Some of the Suggested Tasks for the Technical Component have Regulatory implications and may be addressed in this section.

• Early and often discussions with the DoD Component SMO will save Time and Money and reduce Risk.

Lessons Learned

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Identify other military and civilian and non-U.S. systems likely to be co-site or in close proximity by querying DoD or national system databases

• Identify undesired interactions that may require further study using initial and measured technical parameters for candidate system and the technical parameters of S-D systems expected to be in operational environment.

• Determine acceptable received EM levels to ensure that coexistence is feasible.

• Evaluate system performance and effect on other S-D systems that may operate co-frequency or adjacent frequency expected in the intended environment.

• Quantify, using tests or M&S, the impact of changes to the operational “signals-in-space” RF parameters to co-site EMC.

• Determine potential link degradation and blockage due to atmospheric conditions, terrain and building obstructions within intended deployment areas

• Generate recommendations to mitigate potential technical issues.

SSRA Components Overview Technical


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Identify and quantify interactions with non-DoD, other Federal, and commercial users in the environment.

• Identify/update spectrum risks and recommendations for mitigation of technical issues.

• For non-communications systems (radar, passive sensors, etc.), determine the appropriate operational degradation as a function of the level of received environmental and co-site EMI.

• Address how limitations or restrictions identified in the ESC/HNC process are being mitigated and/or resolved for each S-D equipment.

• Assessment:

– Identify/update spectrum risks and recommend mitigation techniques of Technical issues.


SSRA Components Overview Technical

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• System Technical Parameters – Parametric Data from Spectrum Certification, DD Form 1494’s, J/F-12s

– Data Sheets from Developer(s)

– Program Office/Systems Engineering

Note: Many technical parameters not available early in program

• RF Modeling – Propagation

– Interference Analyses

– Selectivity Curves

– Antenna Coupling

• Co-site/Intersite data/modeling – Platform vs. EME at Key Locations

• Discuss with Program/Systems Engineering Personnel

• Detailed Modeling Data Likely not available for MS A

Data Requirements & Sources

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Tends to overlap with the other DoDI 4650.01 defined Tasks as well as the E3 Assessment (AF, Navy)

• Understand what technical standards apply

• May also need to considered other regional/national/international standards for systems looking to operate outside the US

Lessons Learned

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Identify:

– The S-D equipments that are incorporated, supported by the Acquisition,

– The operational performance requirements, as specified in the Operational Needs Statement (ONS) or Joint Urgent Operational Needs Statement (JUONS) or, and the acquisition documents (e.g. ICD, CDD, CPD, or information support plan (ISP)),

– The S-D systems anticipated to be in system’s operating environment,

– Assess the capability to meet or exceed the requirements

• Assessment: Identify/update risks and develop tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to mitigate operational issues.

SSRA Components Overview Operational


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• JCIDS Documents – ICD, CDD, CPD, ISP, CONOPs

– Systems description information

• Facilities Requirements Documents (if applicable) – May Provide EME

• Discussion with Program/Engineering personnel on impact to

operations of identified EM issues

• Consider impact of identified regulatory issues – Operational impact if you can't radiate or have no approved HNC/ESC


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Understand the intent; not a CONOPs or simply a description

of how the system operates – What other systems will/are operating in the same physical/spectral

space?

– Will geospatial separation be required for frequency use management

for simultaneous operation with other systems?

• EX: Simultaneous employment of UAVs using common control frequency

band

• EX: Flying an aircraft with a new 225-400 MHz transmitter which plans to

utilize four 5 MHz wide sub-bands within the 225-400 MHz band - what will

be the impact to operation of existing 225-400 MHz users?

Lessons Learned

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Determine the potential for EMC and EMI interactions between the proposed system, other systems, and its anticipated operational EME.

• Quantify the potential EMI between the candidate system and S-D systems used by other DoD units in the operational environment.

• Determine the effect on overall system performance as a result of any EM interaction.

• Perform additional E3 analyses (e.g. EMV, EMP, HERP, HERF, HERO, lightning, etc) as required by the MILDEP SMO.

• Assessment: Identify/update spectrum risks and recommend mitigation techniques of E3 issues.

SSRA Components – E3 Assessment Note: Not specifically called out in 4650


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• E3 Requirements – Program Office

• E3 Test Data – Program Office

– EMI Test Plans/Reports

– EMC Test Plans/Report

• Other E3 Analyses

• MIL-HDBK-237


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Overlap between Regulatory, Technical, and Operational Components Section and the E3 Assessment

• See MIL-HDBK-237 for E3 Assessment Guidance

Lessons Learned

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Risk Management

Level Likelihood of Occurrence

Probability of Occurrence

1 Not Likely <20%

2 Low Likelihood 20-40%

3 Likely 40-70%

4 Highly Likely 70-90%

5 Near Certainty >90%

Sample Likelihood of Risk Occurrence Matrix

Common method used to depict the likelihood of occurrence

Like

liho

od

of

Occ

urr

en

ce

5

4

3

2

1


Impacts of Potential Risks

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Regulatory Component Risk Categories Examples

• No certification or approved J/F-12 in the MCEB archived database, however similar equipment has been approved and is in the database

• System is operating in properly allocated frequency spectrum and ESC can be anticipated Y • Requires minimal actions for ESC, i.e. Note-to-Holder or updated certification request • Minimum spectrum issues are known to exist for this equipment • May receive HN spectrum support, but with numerous geographic, temporal, spectrum, or operational

restrictions; spectrum use in a band may be restricted to a limited number of channels.

• No certification or approved J/F-12 in the Military Communications Electronics Board (MCEB) archived database

• HNC process not started; operational and/or developmental use may be extremely limited and/or not permitted at all

• System will not likely receive HN spectrum support, or may be allowed to operate after lengthy bi-lateral negotiations with individual HNs.

• Approved J/F-12 exists in the MCEB archived database (minimum Stage 2 for MS B) G • Requires no actions for spectrum support • No SS issues are known to exist for this equipment in the intended operational area • High likelihood of receiving HN spectrum support to operate with few, or a minimum

number of, possible spectrum or operational restrictions.

Y

R

G

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Technical Component Risk Categories Examples

• Potential link degradation and blockage due to atmospheric conditions or terrain and building obstructions

• System’ will affect other S-D system operating cofrequency or adjacent frequency • Correctable received interference level between the system and other spectrum-dependent systems • Correctable operational degradation as a function of the level of received environmental and co-site

interference. • Correctable intra-platform EMC among co-sited platform emitters

• Candidate technologies not fully developed • Initial EMC analyses indicate adverse electromagnetic interactions • Systems non compliant with U.S. or international spectrum standards • Unacceptable received interference level between the system and other spectrum-dependent

systems • Unacceptable operational degradation as a function of the level of received environmental and co-

site interference. • Unacceptable intra-platform EMC among co-sited platform emitters

• Robust technologies; successfully deployed already • EMC analyses indicate no adverse electromagnetic interactions • Systems fully compliant with U.S. or international spectrum standards • No received interference level between the system and other spectrum-dependent systems • No operational degradation as a function of the level of received environmental and co-site interference. • No intra-platform EMC among co-sited platform emitters

Y

R

G

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Operational Component Risk Categories Examples

• System is operating in properly allocated frequency spectrum and ESC can be anticipated • Expected interference as part of the DoD response to conventional and non-conventional missions is

well understood and mitigation plans are in place.

• Operating in the incorrect or non-allocated frequency band or significant SS issues are known to exist for this system/equipment

• system experiences or causes interference as part of the DoD response to conventional and non-conventional missions.

• Unacceptable frequency-distance separation requirements between a transmitter and a receiver that must be maintained to achieve compatibility.

• The number of anticipated SDE being deployed by US/Coalition forces in close proximity cannot be satisfied from the spectral resources forcing sharing or scheduleing of operations which could adversly affect operations.

• Requires no additional actions for spectrum support • Frequency-distance separation requirements between a transmitter and a receiver are acceptable to

achieve compatibility. • System does not experience or cause interference as part of the DoD response to conventional and

non-conventional missions.

Y

R

G

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

E3 Assessment Risk Categories Examples

• E3/EMC studies funded/planned or completed with mitigation measures identified that will not adversely impact operations

• The mechanisms of any unacceptable level of EMC and EMI interactions determined, via test or analysis, between the proposed system, other systems, and its anticipated operational EME are well understood and corrective actions planned.

• E3 or, as a minimum, EMC and EMI studies not completed, planned or anticipated; known mitigation measures will impact operational deployment and/or use in EME

• Unacceptable level of EMC and EMI interactions determined via, test or analysis, between the proposed system, other systems, and its anticipated operational EME.

• Unacceptable results of additional E3 analyses (e.g. EMV, EMP, HERP, HERF, HERO, lightning, etc).

• E3/EMC studies completed and compatible operations confirmed or acceptable mitigation measures identified that will not impact operations

• No unacceptable level of EMC and EMI interactions determined, via test or analysis, between the proposed system, other systems, and its anticipated operational EME.

Y

R

G

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Data Item Description (DID)

DI-EMCS-81543

“SPECTRUM SUPPORTABILITY RISK ASSESSMENT (SSRA)”

CONTACT MILDEP SMO FOR GUIDANCE

SSRA Report Format

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Front Cover • Introduction • Executive Summary • Regulatory Component of SSRA • Technical Component of SSRA • Operational Component of SSRA • E3 Assessment for SSRA • Conclusions • Recommendations • References

SSRA Report Format Joint Guidance Document Sept 2012

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

•SSRA Supporting Document/Report,

• SSRA Executive Summary of the SSRA Supporting Document/ Report approved by the PM/MATDEV and submitted to the MILDEP SMO,

• Cover or Transmittal letter, signed by the PM/MATDEV, and used to transmit the SSRA Executive Summary to the MILDEP SMO, requesting a Spectrum Supportability Determination.

SSRA Documentation

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

1. Front Cover

– Title of the document

– Month and year of publication

– Acquisition milestone or readiness review it supports & date

– Name(s) of the principal author(s)

– Program office or sponsor’s name and address

– Distribution statements, as required, and

– Security classification markings, as required

SSRA Report Format (Cont)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

11/5/2015

Signature Page Issues: • Who Signs? • In What Order? • Can Contractors?

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

11/5/2015

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

2. Introduction

– A description of the purpose of the report and programmatic decision and/or readiness review it supports.

– A detailed system description including the following: • Physical components (vehicle or platform mounted, stand alone, etc.)

• Materiel readiness level (MRL), where applicable

• Purpose of system and concept of operations

• Subsystem description and block diagrams


Legend: MRL = materiel readiness level VM = vehicle mounted SA = stand alone PM = personnel mounted

Table A-I System Description (SAMPLE)

System

Component

MRL

(where applicable)

System Description

(SA, VM, pm, other (specify))

#1

#2

etc

Army Only

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

11/5/2015

• Could have a lot more System Description, but don’t go overboard!

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

11/5/2015 49

• Tables and pictures are always helpful

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

3. Executive Summary – Cover Page

– Introduction

– Summary of Spectrum and E3 Issues


Table A-II Summary of Spectrum and E3 Issues (SAMPLE)

Issue

Likelihood of

Occurrence (See Table IV)

Impact of Risk (See Table III)

Regulatory issue

# 1 - ESC status

Regulatory issue

#.2 - HNC status

Technical

spectrum issue

Operational

spectrum issues

E3 issues

NONE/MINIMAL MODERATE SIGNIFICANT/SEVERE

RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES:

Regulatory issue #1 (ESC status):

Regulatory issue #2: (HNC status):

:Technical spectrum issue:

Operational spectrum issue:

E3 issues

Insert colors, as applicable

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Click to edit Master title style

11/5/2015

Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment for the Battle Force Tactical Network (BFTN)

• Too much Acquisition Status and summary (IMHO)

• Not focused on the Spectrum and/or EMI issues and mitigation

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED


11/5/2015

Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment for the Battle Force Tactical Network (BFTN)

• EMC and EMV “well documented”, but no mention whether its good or bad!

• Content is a bit thin

Executive Summary (Cont)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

4. Regulatory Components

Include results of tasks described earlier (suggested summary table)


Table A-III Summary of Regulatory Information (SAMPLE)(1)

Nomenclature J/F 12 # Stage/Status(2)(3) US&P(4) OCONUS(5)

NOTES:

(1) For a FoS or SoS, include all S-D systems that are or will be integrated into the FoS or SoS.

(2) Provide the Stage as 1, 2, 3, or 4; indicate status as Approved, (with date) or In-Process (at Equipment

Spectrum Guidance Permanent Working Group awaiting MCEB guidance, etc).

(3) For a FoS or SoS, include, as a note, the acquisition program under which the S-D system is being

procured and POC information.

(4) Provide a YES/NO or Probability (High, Medium, Low) of obtaining necessary frequencies for non-

degraded operation. Provide MCEB guidance, operating conditions and/or restrictions. Include in table as

notes.

(5) Provide a YES/NO or Probability (High, Medium, Low) of obtaining necessary frequencies for non-

degraded operation regarding OCONUS, HN approval status. Provide expanded status (which CCMDs have it)

and guidance where the system or similar system has HN approval. Identify countries and the guidance, or

restrictions. Information may be obtained from the MILDEP SMO as a result of the ESC/HNC processes.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Essentially a listing of whether or not the system has an approved allocation in the countries in which it must operate

• Hard to quantify the mitigation, ie, whether coordination will be done in time for operations

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

5. Technical Component

Describe technical parameters of system (suggested summary table)


Table A-VI System Spectrum Requirements vs. Availability (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) (SAMPLE)

System

Nomenclature

and/or J/F 12#

Freq

Range

Throughput

Required/

Available

BW/Required

Available

Power

Output

Antenna

Gain Factor

NOTES: (1) Availability may be a known quantity or an estimated quantity based on previous operation of the same or

similar systems performing the same type or similar functions.

(2) Where table input may require lengthy or long explanation, use Note and include the information following the

table as a note.

(3) For a FoS or SoS, include all S-D systems that are, or will be, integrated into the FoS or SoS.

(4) Cite source document for requirement.

(5) Cite security classification of data, where applicable.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

. Operational Component – Include a statement of the program requirements, how they are being

met, and a description of the intended operational deployment of the system (see suggested table format)


Table A-VII System Description and Deployment (SAMPLE)

System

Component

Anticipated

HNs

MRL

Deployment

(SA, VM, pm, Other (specify))

Training

Requirements

NOTES:

Legend: MRL = materiel readiness level VM = vehicle mounted SA = stand alone pm = personnel mounted HN = host nation

Include results of tasks described earlier along with a POA&M

for cases of non-compliance where the likelihood of being able

to perform the operational mission is at risk.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

6. Operational Component (continued)

– Identify and quantify system’s ability to perform satisfactorily in operational environment

• Propagation considerations (jungle, urban, desert, at sea, space, etc.)

• Kind and quality of data/information transmitted

• Desired/required ranges

• Operational scenarios considered

– Include a POA&M for resolving non-compliance and risk if unable to perform operational missions because of:

• Intra-system EMC

• Inter-system EMC

– Describe the mitigation measures and impact if:

• Spectrum is unavailable

• System is unavailable


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

7. E3 Assessment for SSRA

- Include the results of the E3 tasks described earlier along with recommendations for mitigation of the E3 risks


Table A-VIII Summary of E3 Issues

Issue Green/ Yellow / Red (see Risk Categories in Table V) E3 Issue #1

E3 Issue #2

E3 Issue #3, etc

NOTES:


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED


11/5/2015

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Problem: Doesn’t describe mitigation measures!

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

8. Conclusions – Include a summary of risks, impact or potential degradation to – System’s operational requirements and mitigation measures


Table A-II Summary of Spectrum and E3 Issues (SAMPLE)

Issue

Likelihood of

Occurrence (See Table IV)

Impact of Risk (See Table III)

Regulatory issue

# 1 - ESC status

Regulatory issue

#.2 - HNC status

Technical

spectrum issue

Operational

spectrum issues

E3 issues

NONE/MINIMAL MODERATE SIGNIFICANT/SEVERE

RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES:

Regulatory issue #1 (ESC status):

Regulatory issue #2: (HNC status):

:Technical spectrum issue:

Operational spectrum issue:

E3 issues


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

11/5/2015

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

9. Recommendations - Provide recommendation as to whether the SSRA should be

forwarded by the MILDEP SMO to their Service CIO for approval and forwarded to the MDA.

10. References - Copies of DD Form 1494 or information page for each S-D item in

system/platform

- Copies of E3 Assessment Reports, when requested.

- Source documents for performance requirements

- DoDI 4650.01 (latest version)

- DoDD 3222.3 (latest version)

- MILDEP Spectrum and E3 policy regulations


UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• The SSRA Will Do, Provides: – A formally documented SS risk assessment, with mitigation

measure(s) identified, to achieve a SS Determination from the FMO, CIO/G6, or OSD(NII) (depending on ACAT and/or level of Interest)

– Details of the following, for each piece of S-D system: • J/F 12’s

• Status of HN Coordination

• Provide/discuss known SS and E3 issues and assigns RISK

• Discuss potential operational impact of known SS and E3 deficiencies

• Provide program risk (R/Y/G) for each system, a risk summary, and mitigation plans to reduce or eliminate YELLOW and RED issues

• Provide an overall, Program assessment for acquisition Milestones

Summary

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• What the SSRA will not do: – Not a substitute for the ESC process; the SSRA is

separate from the ESC process and the resulting MCEB issuance of a J/F 12.

– May not provide detailed E3 assessments but it will identify what EMC/EMI assessments are planned and/or have been conducted, identify risks, and the status of mitigation plans.

Summary (Cont)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• ARMY Joe Reza (915) 593-6881 [email protected]

• NAVY/CNO Mark Johnson (703) 601-1414 [email protected]

• NAVAIR Mike Squires (301) 342-1660 [email protected]

• NAVSEA Doug Knapman (202) 781-2049 [email protected]

• SPAWAR PACIFIC Dave Hilton (619) 553-2666 [email protected] ATLANTIC Wayne Lutzen (843) 218-5723 [email protected]

Points of Contact • JSC

Training:

Matt Grenis

(410) 293-9264

[email protected]

Brian Farmer

(703) 864-7023

[email protected]

• AIR FORCE Pabon Soto

USAF AFMC AFLCMC/EZAC

[email protected]

• AFSMO Colonel David Bosko

(301) 225-3743

[email protected]

• ASMO Richard DeSalvo

(301) 225-3763

[email protected]

• NMSC Tom Downie

(703) 325-2750

[email protected]

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

https://acc.dau.mil/

The Acquisition Community Connection (ACC)

https://acc.dau.mil/e3

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Sign up and be part of the

Spectrum and E3

Compliance Community! Within the various Spectrum and E3 Compliance SIA

web pages, you will find a variety of information on

requirements, guidance, organizations, etc. associated

with the proper consideration of E3 and spectrum

management considerations for weapon systems and

other DoD equipment in the acquisition cycle. If you are

not presently a Spectrum and E3 SIA member, please feel free to sign-up!

“Spectrum & E3 Compliance”

home page:

acc.dau.mil/e3 or

acc.dau.mil/spectrum

Spectrum & E3 Training:

acc.dau.mil/learn

JSC Spectrum &

E3 Document Library:

acc.dau.mil/library

Lessons Learned

acc.dau.mil/LessonsLearned

Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment (SSRA) … UNCLASSIFIED Spectrum Supportability Risk...

Documents

Transcript of Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment (SSRA) … UNCLASSIFIED Spectrum Supportability Risk...