SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA MAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION …

CAL~ FORNIA

AGENDA

SPECIAL MEETINGof the

MAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION COMMISSION

Monday, September 19, 20113:00 — 5:00 PM

Town/County Conference Room

Recreation Commission Mission Statement:“Enhance social, environmental, and economic well-being of Mammoth Lakes.”

In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact theAdministrative Assistant at (760) 934-2712 ext. 1207. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make

reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II)

NOTE: All comments will be limited by the Chairman to a speaking time of five minutes.

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

Recreation Commissioners: Bill Sauser, Tony Colasardo, Ten Stehlik, Knud Svendsen, SeanTurner, Patricia Agnitch.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION

1. RecStrats Prioritization — Stuart Brown

ADJOURNMENT

Discussion Item # 1September 19, 2011

RECREATION COMMISSIONSTAFF REPORT

Subject: RECSTRATS Implementation Plan Prioritization

Initiated by: Stuart Brown, Recreation ManagerRay Jarvis, Public Works DirectorMark Wardlaw, Community Development Director

BACKGROUND:The Strategic Marketing Group (SMG) presented the RecStrats ImplementationPlan to the Recreation Commission on August 9, 2011. The commissionunanimously accepted the plan as presented, and recommended the Councilaccept and file the plan at the October 5, 2011 meeting.

Upon acceptance of the document, SMG recommended the commission beginincorporating the identified recommendations and elements of the plan intowork items, and ultimately the Town of Mammoth Lakes 5-year CapitalImprovement Plan and public facilities finance plan.

Current work items include the creation of the Measure R Fall fundingprinciples and priorities, along with the prioritization of the items identified inthe Project List (Part 6).

Staff is requesting the commission review not only the RecStrats Non-Linkagelist of Community Identified Elements and the Final Consolidated ElementProject List, but create a comprehensive list of parks and recreation projects forconsideration, priontization and inclusion in the Town of Mammoth Lakes 5-year Capital Improvement Plan.

To aid in this process, staff has included pertinent sections of the DRAFT’ Parksand Recreation Master Plan; DRAFT Town of Mammoth Lakes 2011- 12 Five-year Capital Improvement Plan for Parks and Recreation projects, and theaforementioned RecStrats lists.

This comprehensive list of all-inclusive recreation projects would then beconsidered and blended into the Town of Mammoth Lakes 5-year CapitalImprovement Plan (CIP) process scheduled to commence in October of this yearand conclude in June, 2012 — consistent with the FY 2012/13 budget process.See Attachment C for the proposed scope of work. Council is scheduled toreview and approve the scope of work for the 5 year CIP and public facilitiesfinance plan on October 5, 2011.

Page 1 of 2

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:RecStrats Non-Linkage List of Community Identified ElementsIn addition to the linkage list, the workshops identified a number of worthwhileprojects that had no linkages to multiple core areas. This list contains anumber of worthwhile projects which may be implemented as part of the majorprojects or are worthwhile as standalone projects (Attachment A).

Staff is recommending the commission review the list and determine if anyitems need to be addressed, considered as major or standalone projects,and/or included in the prioritization process.

RecStrats Final Consolidated Element Project ListThe final consolidated element project list (Attachment B) was presented at thecommunity linkage workshop and attendees were asked to rank them whencompared against the guiding principles (Stewardship/Management, EconomicDevelopment and Quality of Life).

Staff is recommending the commission review the list and determine if anyitems need to be included, and prioritize them accordingly based on theRecStrats Guiding Principles.

RECOMMENDATION:Staff is requesting the commission review not only the RecStrats Non-Linkagelist of Community Identified Elements and the Final Consolidated ElementProject List, but create a comprehensive list of parks and recreation projects forconsideration, prioritization and inclusion in the Town of Mammoth Lakes 5-year Capital Improvement Plan and public facilities finance plan.

Attachments:A — RecStrats Non-Linkage List of Community Identified ElementsB — RecStrats Final Consolidated Element Project ListC — Recommended 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) ProcessD — DRAFT’: Parks and Recreation 2011-12 5-year CIP listE — DRAFT: Parks and Recreation Master Plan Highlights

Page 2 of 2

—4-

“DRAFT 2.0”

Mammoth Lakes REC STRATS II- Implementation Strategy

A Vision for Recreation in Mammoth Lakes and a Plan for Its Implementation

~+., ?“•~•~•~:‘ ~--~

/

• ~‘

~ ~

4~. ,

- — .1 ~ ——

•~ ~ --‘‘

.1 •- -

• - -

-~ ~

~

-& ~) --~ .—40-

Prepared for the Town of Mammoth Lakes

9 August 2011

RECSTRA~SV on & 0*

Mo fbi totci, Coi,fo~nio

Prepared by:

uKE~)N~

~SM3

P0 Box 10109 South Lake Tahoe Cahfornia 96158 (530) 541-2462 FAX (530) 541-8720 wwwsmgonhne net

RECSTRATS II Implementation Plan

D. Non-Linkage List of Community Identified Elements

In addition to the linkage list (above), the workshops also identified a number of worthwhile projectsthat had no linkages to multiple core areas. As can be seen, this list contains a number of worthwhileprojects some of which may be implemented as part of the major projects or are worthwhile as standalone project.

Unlinked Project Elements List

• Fish stocking• Develop gateway / sense of arrival to town• Inventory of recreation trends• Create partnerships• Develop water sports opportunities including boating, water skiing, kayaking, canoeing,

swimming, kite surfing, wakeboarding, windsurfing, hot tubbing, fishing• Enhance Municipal sports• Create nature observational activities• Move Warta Cabin• Support infrastructure development• Develop a connection to the Digital 395 iniative• Advocate group/coalition for supporting arts & culture efforts• Provide sustainable funding for non-profit arts organizations• Creation of arts & culture commission• Develop Snowcross and Motocross opportunities• Build Elder hostels/eco-tourism• Banners at entrance of town and along Highway2O3

30

-~—


0C. Final Consolidated Element Project List

This list was presented at the community linkage workshop and attendees were asked to rank themwhen compared against the guiding principles2. Major capital projects are highlighted in grey and shortterm, immediate impact are underlined.

Project Element Avg. Score

• Field I-louse/Recreation facility/Community Recreation Center (multi-use, flexibleprogramming, versatile, assorted sport-focus) 10.9

• Adopt and implement Trail System Master Plan 10.8

• Coordination of operations & marketing of recreation 10.5and arts experience to provide information, maps, assistancewith permitting events, access to resources, central spot for disseminating information etc.

• Multi-use outdoor facility, including large amphitheater with 10.4appropriate equipment, picnic benches, and adequate venuespace and parking

Q • Development of youth camps and learning programs (for all ages) 10.2linked to Mammoth-centric experiences that integrate naturalenvironment experience and provide physical activities (i.erunning camps to become better runner, bike camps forimproving skills, etc)

• Indoor performing arts center with appropriate acoustics/lighting, adequate 10.2venue, meeting, and seating space and parking

• Multi-use fields and tennis courts (ball sports, running track, etc) 10

• Increased coordination with Inyo National Forest to develop and market 9.9joint recreation opportunities

• Improved infrastructure to increase access, connectivity and enhancedexperience 9.5(e.g., shuttle stops, bike racks, staging areas for motorized access, etc)

2 Scores were calculated in the following manner: workshop attendees were asked to rank each element on a score

of-S to +5 when compared to each of the guiding principles. The score for each was added up from all attendeesand divided by the number of attendees to get an average which is reported here.

28


• Better utilization and maintenance of existing facilities and equipment 9.3(including public and private facilities)

• Aquatic facility (indoor/outdoor) 8.7

• More way-finding, signage, maps and information systems around town 8.7utilizing emerging technology-based resources

• Nordic cross country ski trail system around Town of Mammoth Lakes 8.4

• High Altitude Training/Campus/Facility/Center with gym and trainers 8.1

• Accessible/affordable lodging ,dining, and training facilities for athletes 8.0conducting high-altitude training

• Urban park with winter snow play and sledding area 7.6

• Biathlon training center 7.3

• Professional staff for municipal sports & recreation training and education 6.8

• Low-cost and/free awareness, education and interpretive programs 6.5

29

,~i i. ‘H[~ 1’.T 4

Annual Fiscal Year BudgetRecommended 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Process

October — NovemberBegin Fiscal Year CIP development, review and approval process

• Staff prepares background data and information• CIP Committee review

o Review economic outlook and projected fmance, funding and staffresources

o Review past year progress and project status: completion, carry over,modifications, deferrals, cancelations

o - Review potential new projectso Review project scope, cost, schedule and fundingo Rank and prioritize 5-year project recommendations

• Committee recommends Draft CIP for public and Commission review

DecemberStaff publishes Draft CIP for review

January — FebruaryPublic and Commission input and review of Draft CIP

C) • Conduct Airport, Mobility, Recreation, Public Arts, and Planning CommissionPublic Workshops

MarchCommission review and recommendations to Town Council

• Staff prepares revised Draft CIP• Review and recommendations by Commissions

April -MayTown Council Fiscal Year Budget review

• Review recommended Draft CIP• Revise and reconcile Draft CIP and Budget

JuneTown Council Fiscal Year and CIP Budget adoption

7/21/2011

/—

CALIFORNIA

2011-20125 Year Capital Improvement Plan

TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES2011-12 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan

Project Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 I 2015-16 FiveYearTotalAirport Access Southerly Entrance $262,000 $117,073 $114,434 $1,583,769 $2,077,276Airport Terminal Annex $275,000 $275,000New Airport Terminal $225,000 $1,255,000 I $18,240,000 $19,720,000

________________________________________________________________________________ $900,000 $900,000$897,410

________________________________________________________________________________ $50,000 $50,000$91,646

$152,250$1,100,000

$80,000$50,000

$250,000

$2,873,000

Loader and Snowblowers I $703,815 I $193,595Town Yard Gas Pump Regulatory UpgradesTown Yard Boiler Replacement $10,000 $91,646TOML Gateway Monument $20,000 $132,250New Policy Facility $1,100,000Police Facility Remodel $80,000Police Facility Emergency GeneratorPolice Facility Covered ParkingStorm Drain Master PlanMunicipal WayfindingOver Street BannersSidewalk PayersNew Street FurnatureLakeview/Lake Mary Road Intersection Improvements $131,708 $500,000 I $111,000Main Street Intersection Improvements $130,000Meridian Boulevard Project $353,000Lower Canyon Blvd Rehabilitation $141,290Tavern Road ExtensionTransit SheltersTransit Facility ExpansionTransit Parking Lot PavingSR2S Tavern Sidewalks $40,000 $551,103Sierra Park Gap Closure $65,000 $784,000Sierra Nevada Sidewalk Project $350,000 $150,000College Connector Path $50,000 $548,000Manzanita Connector Path $10,000Twin Lakes Trail Head $203,757TOML / USFS Wayfinding $85,000 $139,307Lake Mary Bike Lane Project $12,710,656 $500,000Lake Mary Road Bike Path Completion Project $80,000 $200,000Waterford Bridges $22,500 $2,500Upper Parking Lot RehabilitationReplace Storage ShedTennis Court Rehabilitation (PR-12)New Park Identification Sign _______________

Parking Lot Connector Trail ________________

Trash Bin ScreeningLower Parking Lot RehabilitationPlayground Compliance Project $136,500 _______________

Perimeter Fencing Project ________________

Clear_and Grub MCP EastReplace Snack Bar Exterior SidingVolleyball Court Concrete CurbPave Upper Parking LotInstall Paver Picnic Area __________________

Trash Bin Screening ________

.i,Iii

$742,708$130,000$353,000

$3,014,290

II

II

I

$591,103$849,000$500,000$598,000

$10,000$228,061$224,307

$13,210,656$280,000

$25,000$135,000

$10,000 $10,000$30,000 $250,000 $250,000 I $250,000 $780,000

$7,500 $7,500$20,000 $20,000

_______________ $6,500_______________ $160,000

________________ $136,550________________ $30,000

$135,000

$160,000

$30,000

$6,500

$64,800 $64,800$23,530 $23,530

$100,000 $100,000$162,000 $162,000

$6,500

TRC-1 Town Recreation Center / Multi-use Facility $1,149,475 $897,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,046,475TEP-Ol Complete Parks Design $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000WPK-1 New Park Identification Sign $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500WPK-2 Replace Main Water Line $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,000 $0 $56,000WPK-3 U~date Well House Electrical & Plumbing $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000WPK-4 ark Perimeter Fencing $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000WPK-5 ~place Ball Field Backstops & Dugouts $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000WPK-6 Picnic Pavilion $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000WPK-7 ADA Updates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-8 Whitmore Track (PR-16) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,272,177WPL-1 New Park Identification Sign $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500WPL-2 ehabilitate Parking Lot and Driveway $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000WPL-3 001 Pump Room Updates $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000WPL-4 Trash Bin Screening $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500WPL-5 Locker Room Updates $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000

5 YEAR CIP TOTAL $17,092,701 [ $4,511,401 $1,116,000 $3,568,000 $579,330 $637,000 [ $31,090,963

4

PR — Parks and Recreation

2011-20125 Year Capital Improvement Plan

Town of Mammoth Lakes

May 2011

=MCP-1 Playground Compliance Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0MCP-2 Perimeter Fencing Project $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000MCP Sub-Total $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000

~ ~:~3I~ kSRP-1 Replace Snack Bar Exterior Siding $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,800 $0 $64,800SRP-2 Volleyball Court Concrete Curb $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,530 $0 $23,530SRP-3 Pave Upper Parking Lot $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000SRP-4 Install Paver Picnic Area $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $162,000 $162,000SRP-5 Trash Bin Screening $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500SRP Sub-Total $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $88,330 $262,000 $356,830

~ ~ flZ~~~I!FTTI~r4’L!Ii.1’iir’CCP-1 Upper Parking Lot Rehabilitation $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000 $0 $135,000CCP-2 Replace Storage Shed $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000CCP-3 Tennis Court Rehabilitation (PR-12) $0 $0 $30,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $780,000CCP-4 New Park Identification Sign $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500CCP-5 Parking Lot Connector Trail $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000CCP-6 Trash Bin Screening $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500CCP-7 Lower Parking Lot Rehabilitation $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $160,000CCP Sub-Total $0 $0 $74,000 $410,000 $385,000 $250,000 $1,119,000=

WPK-1 New Park Identification Sign $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500WPK-2 Replace Main Water Line $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,000 $0 $56,000WPK-3 Update Well House Electrical & Plumbing $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000WPK-4 Park Perimeter Fencing $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000WPK-5 Replace Ball Field Backstops & Dugouts $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000WPK-6 Picnic Pavilion $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000WPK-7 ADA Updates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-8 Whitmore Track (PR-16) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,891,727WPK Sub-Total $0 $0 $7,500 $170,000 $106,000 $75,000 $3,250,227

Page Project # Project Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Five Year Total

Whitmore PoolNew Park Identification SignRehabilitate Parking Lot and DrivewayPool Pump Room UpdatesTrash Bin ScreeningLocker Room UpdatesSub-Total-— Center I Multi-use Facility

Trails End Park

Town Recreation Center / Multi-use Facility $2,150,000 $897,000Sub-Total $2,150,000 $897,000

$7,500 _____________

$115,000$25,000

$6,500$150,000

$189,000 $115,000

Trails End ParkSub-Total

$40,000$40,000

5 YEAR CIP TOTAL I $4,300,000 I $40,000 I $307,000 I $695,000 $579,330 I $587,000 I $5,100,057

$7,500$115,000$25,000

$6,500$150,000

$304,000

$3,047,000$3,047,000

$40,000$40,000

CCC

L.

CC

in (PR-12)

Bin ScrPPninn-7 ILower Parkinci Lot D~k~kiIW~fi,~n

ccP-1CCP-2CCP-3CCP-4CCP-5CCP-6 ii

..r~ (~t~nnr,,

CCP-7 I Lower

Year 1so

ing

$0

Year 2so

a Lot Pc~hahiIW~Ht,n

Year 3so

Year 4

-‘~Hn (PR-12) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0so so so so so so so

TraiI $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Year 5so

$0

soAverage

$05 YEAR MAINTENANCE TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$0

so

$0 so so $0

Community Center Park & Tennis Courts Project#Upper Parking Lot Rehabilitation

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Removeand replace the 40 year oldparking lot adjacent to thetennis courts. Project willprovide a properly striped lotwith drainage improvements

Justification: Current asphaltparking lot is failing and needcomplete reconstruction toimprove drainage and increasenumber of parking spaces

Public Benefit: ADA compliantparking areas and increasednumber of spaces

Project Manager:

Est. Project Cost: = $135000Est. Annual ops Costs: = $

PROJECT FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $135,000 $135,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000 $0 $135,000

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundUnfunded $135,000 $135,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000 $0 $135,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThe maintenance of this project is currently accounted for in the budget and will have no additional impacts

ADA Updates include: Properly striped and signed ADA parking space, Widening path to accommodate 2 passing chairs

Prolect funded could be sourced from Parks Grants, DIF, Measure R, Measure U, or General Fund

Project FundingC Unfunded,

$135,000,100%

e Unfunded

Community Center Park & Tennis Courts Project #Tennis Court Rehabilitation CCP-3

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Projectinvolves the re-construction ofthe 6 tennis courts and fencingcurrently in use at theMammoth Community Center

Justification: The tennis courtsare a popular summer attractionand are in need of repair.Regular maintenance to fillcracks in becoming ineffectiveas asphalt continues to fail, thecracks expand creating triphazards and a sub-standardplaying surface that effectsplayability

Public Benefit: The facilityprovides a recreation need, asan alternative outdoor activity

Project Manager:


PROJECT FINANCING

Z~.

25/01/2007

Project FundingD Unfunded,

$780,000,100%

0 0 Unfunded

Expenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesign $30,000 $30,000ROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $750,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $30,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $780,000

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundUnfunded $30,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $780,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $30,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $780,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThis project will reduce annual maintenance costs by eliminating the need for annual crack repair. The new courts willcontinue to need resurfacing every few years this is accounted for in the budget

This project was previously PR-12

Project funded could be sourced from Parks Grants, DIF, Measure R, Measure U, or General Fund

Community Center Park & Tennis Courts Project #Replace Storage Shed CCP-2

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Removeand replace the existing storageshed with a pre-fabricatedstructure

Justification: Existing shed isfalling apart. A new shed isneeded to protect equipmentand supplies.

Public Benefit: Shed willprotect equipment and suppliesduring winter months

Project Manager:

Est. Project Cost: = $10000EsLAnnu~ops Costs: = $

PROJECT FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency sio,ooo $10,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundUnfunded sio,000 $10,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000



Unfunded,$10,000,

100%

Project Funding

S ØUnfunded

Community Center Park & Tennis Courts Project#New Park Identification Sign CCP-4

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Replaceexisting park sign with a signconsistent with current Townsignage

Justification: The existing signis antiquated and misleading. Anew sign is needed to properlyidentify the park as a Townfacility.

M 1~ MMOT H .L AKO1\4c U~1t~ Y CEN

• • -• )- - V.

L~r\r\r\l

.-- ,

• ~—-,~—•• -, .~. .,-•~ .:• -~=-~

~

Public Benefit: New andimproved sign that is consistentwith other Town signage

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500


Project Totals $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500



Project Fundingo Unfunded,

$7,500, 100%

0 Unfunded

Community Center Park & Tennis Courts Project #Trash Bin Screening CCP-6

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Providecinder block screening arounddumpsters

Justification: Currentlydumpsters are in plain sight andare somewhat unsightly and notaesthetically pleasing. Area willconfine trash and assist inkeeping out wildlife

Public Benefit: Screeningdumpsters will be moreconsistent with the parks overalland appearance

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500


Project Totals $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThis project will not require any significant maintenance.


.1i~-~ ~. i,;.

‘*6_) 0

—~CA~ES ‘—~,

Project Funding~ Unfunded,

$6,500, 100%

0 Unfunded

Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Install230’ long connector trailbetween upper and lowerparking lots

Justification: There iscurrently no connection betweenthe 2 facility parking lotscreating a gap in accessibility tothe playground and tenniscourts. The connector will easeoverflow parking for the park.

— ~ ‘-~/ —

~ ,,.. ;_‘ ~ ‘~ — ~ ~‘~i. ~•-• ft

- ~ ~ :~: -~_ k~~: ~

Public Benefit: Providesoverflow parking and bettercommunity access toplayground and Tennis Courts

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000


Project Totals $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThe project will require sealing and occasional repair. This work can be accounted on an as needed basis within the annualmaintenance budget

Community Center Park & Tennis Courts Project #Parking Lot Connector Trail CCP-5

2011-12 Capital Improvement Plan

C Unfunded,$20,000,

100%

Project Funding

S

Project funded could be_sourced from Parks Grants, DIF, Measure R, Measure U, or General Fund

Community Center Park & Tennis Courts Project#Lower Parking Lot Rehabilitation CCP-7

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Removeand replace the 40 year oldparking lot adjacent to thecommunity Center. Project willprovide a properly striped lotwith drainage improvements

Justification: Current asphaltparking lot is failing and needscomplete reconstruction toimprove drainage and minimizefuture a maintenance costs.

Public Benefit: ADA compliantparking area, drainage controland reduced future maintenancecosts

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $160,000


Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $160,000



4.

-j~ ~-.

~ )r~4~~;~

Project FundingC Unfunded,

100%$160,000 Unfunded

S

neter Fencinq Project

and Grub MCP East

Expena

U

0

__________________________________ ;ategoryMCP-1 Playground Compliance Project

MCP-2 Perimeter Fencing Project

U

0n

IC

$0 I

U

0n

Li

0

DI

1)

0

I MCP-3 IClear and Grub MCP East $0 I 0 0 I $0 $0 $05 YEAR MAINTENANCE TOTAL I $0 I $) I $) I $° ~ $0 $0

DI

IC ii ~,

$0Average

$0

Mammoth Creek Park Project ifPlayground Compliance Project MCP-1


~\~\ ~

L~L~ - ~

~‘I~ ~7E ~

—‘ r~ ~ — ~- ~ .-!ij’~ - :~~~j~\4 i~/j ~

~—. __\~ ~

-- •-~~ ~ —.~- -~ -1~ -~

-- ~ f.:—~~

-: -.

_•___) :[~Mi~~

Public Benefit: Provide newsafer playgound equipment

Project Manager:



Project Totals $136,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $136,500

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral Fund $136,500 $0Other

Project Totals $136,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $136,500


Project will be constructed Summer 2011

Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Removeand reconstruct playground tomeet State and Federal codesand regulations.

Justification: Currentplayground does not meet Stateand Federal requirements andcould potentially be a liability tothe Town

Project Funding

[~GeneraI Fund

General Fund, $0

Mammoth Creek Park Project #Perimeter Fencing Project MCP-2

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Removeand reconstruct 400 feet ofperimeter fencing along OldMammoth Road

Justification: Existing fence is15-20 years and old and isfailing. A new fence is requiredto ensure the safety of parkusers.

~_~_ ~-:,-‘— — —-

[/S.

• ?

:~ ~ 1’

Public Benefit: Enhancedsafety, and aesthetics

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000


Project Totals $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThis project will require little to no maintenance. Any incedental repair or maintenance is currently accounted for in theexisting budget

Existing Fencing = 400LF


Project FundingUnfunded,

$30,000, 100%

~Unfunded

Prepared: 5/3/2011Project Description: Clearand grub Mammoth Creek Parkeast Install erosion controlmeasures

Justification: Clearing the sitewill provide additional eventspace.

Public Benefit: More locationsto hold community and specialevents

Project Manager:

Est. Project Cost: = $15000Est. Annual ODS Costs: =


Project Totals $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000


Project Totals $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThis project will require little to no maintenance.


Mammoth Creek Park Project #Clear and Grub MCP East MCP-3


F A

,~, ~ :;~ ~

Unfunded,$15,000, 100%

Project Funding

S

Project # Project Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 I FiveYearTotal

SRP-1 Replace Snack BarE

SRP-2 Volleyball Court Concre e Curb

Lb

J

)) t)

2

$0 $0SRP-3 Pave Upper Parking Lot $200 j $200 j $200 j $200 $200 $200SRP-4 Install Paver Picnic Area I I $0 j $0 j $0 I $0 $0 $0SRP-5 Trash Bin Screening I I $0 I $0 j $0 I $0 $0 $0

5 YEAR MAINTENANCE TOTAL $200 $200 f $200 f $200 ] $200 $200

.4so

$0 $0so

Averaqeso

Shady Rest Park Project #Replace Snack Bar Exterior Siding SRP-1

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Replaceexisting Snack Bar siding withHardy Board or similar siding

Justification: Existing sidinghas been destroyed by wildlifeleaving large hole for animals toaccess the snack bar. Animalsare now living within the facility

7—

Public Benefit: The new sidingwill keep wildlife out. Improvingthe sanitation of the facility.

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,800 $0 $64,800


Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,800 $0 $64,800

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThe construction will reduce maintenance costs as this material requires little maintenance.

Costs = $64/SF, 14400 SF Required



$64,800, 100%\\ BUnfunded

Shady Rest Park Project #Volleyball Court Concrete Curb SRP-2

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Removean replace existing woodencurbing with concrete.

Justification: Existing woodencurbing is degrading and issplitting and splintering.Concrete curbing will betterretain the court and require lessmaintenance

••~•~,

- ~ ~ :

Public Benefit: Project willrequire less maintenance and bemore aesthetically pleasing

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,530 $0 $23,530


Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,530 $0 $23,530

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThis project will require little to no maintenance. Any incedental repair or maintenance would be accounted for in the existingbudget

Costs= $65/LFfor 362’


D Unfunded,$23,530,

100%

Project Funding

S I~I Unfundedi

Shady Rest Park Project #Pave Upper Parking Lot SRP-3

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Pave andstripe upper parking lot.

Justification: Existing parkinglot is a dirt lot that is not pavedor striped. This leads todrainage and erosion problems.This parking lot will provideneeded parking for specialevents

Public Benefit: Project willprovide a proper parking areafor park users.

Project Manager:

Est. Project Cost: = $100000Est. Annual ops Costs: = $200

PROJECT FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency sioo,ooo $100,000

Project Totals ~o $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundUnfunded $ioo,ooo $100,000

Project Totals so so ~o $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSExpenditure Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AveragePark Grounds Maintenance $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200Park Building MaintenanceContractual ServicesMaintenance Supplies

Project Totals $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200

Project will require annual striping and sealing as neededProject funded could be sourced from Parks Grants, DIF, Measure R, Measure U, or General Fund

~• ~.

-

r ‘

Project FundingO Unfunded,

100%$100,000, ØUnfunded

S

Shady Rest Park Project #Install Paver Picnic Area SRP-4

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Installpavng stones around existingpicnic shelter.

Justification: Provide a cleandust free environment aroundpicnic and BBQ areas.

Public Benefit: Project willprovidea a proper picnic andBBQ area.

Project Manager:

Est. Project Cost: = $162000Est. Annual ons Costs: = $

. PROJECT FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $162,000 $162,000

Project Totals so so $0 $0 $0 $162,000 $162,000


Project Totals so so so so so $162,000 $162,000



Project FundingU Unfunded,

100%$162,000, 0 Unfunded

S

Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Providecinder block screening arounddumpsters



Project Manager:


PROJECT FINANCINGexpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $6,500 $6,500

Project Totals $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500


Project Totals $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500


Shady Rest Park Project #Trash Bin Screening SRP-5


:

• ‘S..-— —-~ --S. ~

S — .5 5 5 .

S. — S — — •~S _~

—S. 5 ~ S~ S~ —.

O Unfunded,$6,500, 100%

Project Funding

S 0 Unfunded


I II TRC-1 ITown Recreation Center / Multi-use Facility [ $1,149,475 $922,000 I $0 $0 I $0 $0 $2,071,475

5 YEAR CIP TOTALL 1 149,475 ~922,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,071,475~ I ~~ • (11h1111(1 ~-

Project Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AverageTRC-1 Town Recreation Center / Multi-use Facility $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000

5 YEAR MAINTENANCE TOTAL [ $4,000 $4,000 [ $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000

Page Project # Project I Prior 2011-12 I 2012-13 2013-14 I 2014-15 2015-16 Five Year Total

‘I• ‘•• -‘•,•‘ •~,.. ~

—, ~•, •~‘- ~ ~

4 1 •~— $yt •.~ .L..’~:. H’- -~

-

~-

‘ , t~

— - ~-,- -~

r .- —- - .••. - ~~:- ~

— — \.-,,, - _t___1~ .,

-~ ~3 : —

Ii

PROJECT FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesign $25,000 $25,000ROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $2,125,000 $922,000 $3,047,000

Project Totals $2,150,000 $922,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,072,000

Funding Source(s)Assessment DistrictDeveloper Impact Fees $370,475 $370,475Federal/State Funding $754,000 $500,000 $1,254,000Other - Measure R $25,000 $57,000 $82,000General Fund $365,000 $365,000

Project Totals $1,149,475 $922,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,071,475

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSExpenditure Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AveragePark Grounds Maintenance $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500Park Building Maintenance $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500Contractual Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Maintenance Supplies si,ooo $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

Project Totals $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000

Town Recreation Center - ICe Rink I Multi-use Facility Project#2011-12 Capital Improvement Plan TRC-1

Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Project toinclude a 26,000 square foot indoormulti-purpose facility including an indoorice rink. It is another phase of therecreation center described in PR-02A.

Justification: The Recreationcenter contributes to the available parksand recreation facilities. The designdescription is the result of a communityprocess conducted by Design Workshopin 2003.

Public Benefit: it meets an unmetrecreation need by providing analternative to skiing or other outdooractivities, especially during inclementweather..

Project Manager:


Project FundingOther - MeasureR, $82,000, 4% General Fund,\ /$365ooo~ 18% 0 Developer Impact Fees

• Federal/State FundingC Other - Measure RFederal/State

Funding, Developer Impact C General Fund$1,254,000, 60% “- Fees, $370,475,

18%

IProlect funded could be sourced from Parks Grants. DIF. Measure R. Measure U. or General Fund I

Additional Information

Project may be phased depending on available funding. Currently have a $500,000 State grant for the multiuse facility and$221,000 parks prop 50 grant, $34,000 prop 12 grant. The $221,000 must be expended by 2008 and the environmental mustbe completed by 2007. Parks and Rec DIF funds 37.37% in Parks and Rec DIF funding. Slab construction is estimated to cost$950,000 and the roof superstructure is estimated to cost 1.2 million to build. Measure R funds have been requested howeveran alternative funding source could be DIF

Town Recreation Center - Ice Rink I Multi-use Facility Project#2011-12 Capital Improvement Plan TRC-1

I~I~’I] TEP-01 Icompiete Parks Design $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000

5 YEAR CIP TOTAL $0 $40,000 $0 0 $0 $0 $40,000~

Project Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AverageTEP-Ol Complete Parks Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5 YEAR MAINTENANCE TOTAL1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Prepared: 1/2512011Project Description: CompleteTrails End Park Design completewith plans and specifications.Park will include playground,skate parks for all ages andwater play area

Justification: Completion ofparks is a goal of the Parks andRecreation Draft Master Plan

I~~- S

Public Benefit:A completepark for all ages

Project Manager:


PROJECT FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesign $40,000 $40,000ROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency

Project Totals $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundMeasure R $40,000 $40,000

Project Totals $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSThis completion of the park will have an impact on the Parks and Recreation budget. However there is currently not enoughinformation available to accurately determine the exact amount of funding needed to maintain the completed facility

Trails End Park Project#Complete Park Design TEP-1


A’

I

Project Funding

Measure R,$40,000, 100%

[DMeasure R

Received $40,000 in FaIl 2010 Measure Funding to complete design work for playground and additional skate parkThis planning process will provide cost data and phasing for the completion of the park

I~A’~fl1~TIT~ fli:WPK-1 New Park Identification Sign $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500WPK-2 Replace Main Water Line $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,000 $0 $56,000WPK-3 Ipdate Well House Electrical & Plumbing $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000WPK-4 Park Perimeter Fencing $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000WPK-5 Replace Ball Field Backstops & Dugouts $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000WPK-6 Picnic Pavilion $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000WPK-7 ADA Updates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-8 Whitmore Track (PR-16) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,272,177

5 YEAR CIP TOTAL $0 $0 $7,500 $170,000 $106,000 $75,000 $3,630,677~JTI~T~7~

Expenditure Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AverageWPK-1 New Park Identification Sign $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-2 Replace Main Water Line $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-3 Update Well House Electrical & Plumbing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-4 Park Perimeter Fencing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-5 Replace Ball Field Backstops & Dugouts $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-6 Picnic Pavilion $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200WPK-7 ADA Updates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPK-8 Whitmore Track (PR-16) $69,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $33,800

5 YEAR MAINTENANCE TOTAL1 $69,200 $25,200 $25,200 $25,200 $25,200 $34,000

Page Project # Project Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Five Year Total

Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Replaceexisting park sign with a signconsistent with current Townsignage


r _

—~, ~- -

~ ~‘ , _,..,;-.:,,..

• - •

S •,1

r~ -.

-I-- -r~ ~-‘,f~

~-•. -•~-~~ ~‘


Project Manager:


PROJECT FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 ~ TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $7,500 $7,500

Project Totals $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500


Project Totals $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500


Whitmore Park Project#New Park Identification Sign wPK-1



$7,500, 100%\\\ ØUnfun~~


Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Removean replace existing PVC mainwater line.

Justification: The existing piehas failed multiple times and isin need of replacement. Existingwater line feeds fire, existingand future irrigation andfacilities and is undersized forthese needs.

Public Benefit: Reduction infuture maintenance costs, Willensure water supply for allneeds

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,000 $0 $56,000

Funding Source(s) -

Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundUnfunded $56,000 $56,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,000 $0 $56,000


Whitmore Park Project #Replace Main Water Line wPK-2

20 11-12 Capital Improvement Plan


$56,000, 100%

[~ünfunded I


Whitmore Park Project #Update Well House Electrical & Plumbing WPK-3

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Re-wireentire well house to currentbuilding codes. Install newplumbing and sensors withvariable speed pump.

Justification: The existingwiring is old and has modifiedand spliced numerous times andhas become problematic.Plumbing system is inefficientand needs constant repair.

.

Public Benefit: Reduction infuture maintenance costs. Willsimplify future upgrades.

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000


Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $150,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS

This project will reduce maintenance costs



$150,000, 100%

ØUnfunded

Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: InstallPerimeter fencing around entirepark

Justification: Whitmore Park isopen range. Currently the parkis not fenced. Fencing will keepwildlife and cattle out of thepark.

~;

~,:. ~ •~~•‘~•

- ~ •4•~ :7

— ~ ~;

Public Benefit: Fencing willreduce damage caused bylivestock.

Project Manager:


PROJEC~ FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $20,000 $20,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000


Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000


Whitmore Park Project #Park Perimeter Fencing WPK-4



$20,000, 100%

0 Unfunded


Whitmore Park Project #Replace Ball Field Backstops & Dugouts WPK-5


Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Replaceball field backstop fencing anddugouts.

Justification: Existing backstopfencing and dugouts are old andhave been extensively modifiedover the years. Backstops arebecoming unsafe.

• .y.~ —.5 -

•/ ~:-~~: .-,• ~-.~-~-•.~ ~41__

— 5•_ S

~-~~-- .~• --

- -.~. -~ •-~• -~ S ~

~— ~ ~ —;~~ —a’ -~~- ~ L’ —

Public Benefit: Project willprovide safe backstops anddugouts

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000


Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000


Project funded could be sourced from Parks Grants, DIE, Measure R, Measure U, or General Fund

Project Funding

Unfunded,$50,000, 100%

~Unfunded

Whitmore Park Project #Picnic Pavilion wPK-6

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Projectwill construct a picnic pavilionfor park users

Justification: The park doesnot provide any shade or picnicareas for visitors. The Pavilionwill provide a place for users tohold and stage parties andevents.

* *~ ..~..

.‘~

— — -, —~ — — ___%__ —S ~ —

,~ ~~- ?~ ;* ~ ~ ~ ~ ;3~~ ~—‘ r

Public Benefit: Project willenhance park.

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000


Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSExpenditure Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AveragePark Grounds Maintenance $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200Park Building MaintenanceContractual ServicesMaintenance Supplies

Project Totals $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200

Project will require staining, and paint to prevent weather related damageProject funded could be sourced from Parks Grants, DIF, Measure R, Measure U, or General Fund


$75,000, 100%

DUnfund~ã~

Whitmore Park Project #ADA Updates WPK-7

2011-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Projectwill bring entire facility into ADAcompliance

Justification: Existing park isnot ADA compliant.

- -

~~1 -, . * * -

• -•-~,--, -

-

~ !~~‘ — -~ — d ~

4- —. ,-.

: — ~, t I

~- ‘,~.-.•~ ~ —• .,f-- ~CI

I ~ •••~-~• J_._..,_-, e-. - — 1, • -

Public Benefit: Park will beaccessible to all users

Project Manager:


PROJECT FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency

Project Totals so ~o so so so so so

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundUnfunded

Project Totals so ~o so so so so soPROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS

Components of this project may be completed with the Track Update

Project components:~DA Compliant Parking Lot~DA Paths to Ball Fields


Project Funding

C Unfunded

Unfunded, , 0%

Whitmore Park Project #Track Facility WPK-8


Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Trackfacility will include a highperformance all weather 9-lanepolyurethane running track,synthetic infield, locker rooms,storage and concession space,dog park, picnic pavilion, and aparking lot with access road.

Justification: Project supports thecommunity vision of providing thehighest quality of life for residents andthe highest quality of experience forvisitor by being a world renowned yearround destination resort.

Public Benefit: The trackfacility will enhance the trainingand fitness pursuits of residentsand visitors.

Project Manager:


PROJEC~ FINANCINGExpenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesign $108,700

ROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $3,163,477

Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,272,177

Funding Source(s)Assessment DistrictDeveloper Impact FeesFederal/State FundingMeasure R $380,450

Other $2,891,727Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,272,177

PROJECTED ANNUAL_MAINTENANCE_COSTSExpenditure Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AveragePark Grounds Maintenance $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000Park Building Maintenance $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000Contractual Services $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000Maintenance Supplies $46,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $10,800

Project Totals $69,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $33,800

The new facility will require $44,000 in new equipment, this has been added to the first years maintenance budget.

Project Funding

cD ØMeasureR~

Measure R,$380,450 100%

Whitmore Park Project #Track Facility WPK-8


Additional Information

Measure R Awards09 Spring = $27,25009 Fall = $140,00010 Spring = $3,20010 Fall = $90,000

11 Spring = $75,000 Commitment11 FaIl = $135,000 Commitment

Total Awarded $260,450Total Committed $210,000

Measure R Total = $470,450

$2,500 was deposited to cover the Use Permit Application and CEQA processHome Department will cover staff cost to process the application and coordinate permitting with Mono CountyProject was previously PR-16

Cal Recycle Grant $112,404 requested

~T~Z~TIWPL-1 New Park Identification Sign $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500WPL-2 Rehabilitate Parking Lotland Driveway $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000WPL-3 Pool Pump Room Updates $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000WPL-4 Trash Bin Screening $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500WPL-5 Locker Room Updates I $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000

5 YEAR CIP TOTAL $0 $0 $189,000 $115,000 $0 $0 $304,000~ LflT~T~ I IF If -.VaTflTTT~~

Expenditure Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AverageWPL-1 New Park Identification Sign $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPL-2 Rehabilitate Parking Lot and Driveway $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200WPL-3 Pool Pump Room Updates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPL-4 Trash Bin Screening I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0WPL-5 Locker Room Updates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

5 YEAR MAINTENANCE TOTAL1 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200

Page Project # I Project Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Five Year Total


Project Manager:


.~ ‘..

______ PROJECT FINANCING

Expenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $7,500 $7,500

Project Totals $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundOther $7,500 $7,500

Project Totals $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $7,500


Whitmore Pool Project #New Park Identification Sign WPL-1

20 11-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Replaceexisting park sign with a signconsistent with current Townsignage


\VH LiE IDPUBLIC SWIMMING

.,‘i?.O.;ING OOC’R:~, A 0 /A OANCr

SY .iQ::o 00001 ASK. I ‘1,0

I \;J I~ “SILl ‘“00

OS AIIGI I IS lIt ‘f 01 WA OIl AND P0/I C

~

Project FundingOther, $7,500,

100%

I 0 Other

Whitmore Pool Project#Rehabilitate Parking Lot and Driveway WPL-2

20 11-12 Capital Improvement PlanPrepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Removeand replace existing asphaltParking lot and Driveway.

Justification: The existingdriveway and parking lot arefailing and in need of completereconstruction! Parking areaswill be ADA compliant

K ~ —

—•_K.~- ~ ~ ..~

K,

~ fK,f~•.~~ ~-c..? ~,.~ r~, —

4 ~~ i~:~ *j~’~~ ~

‘ •:~ ~ ~. ~

~ ~2.. ~ ~ ~

Public Benefit: Reducedmaintenance costs, ADAcompliant

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundOther $ns,ooo $115,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000

PROJECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTSExpenditure Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 AveragePark Grounds Maintenance $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200

Park Building MaintenanceContractual ServicesMaintenance Supplies

Project Totals $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200

Project will require striping, sealing, and occasional asphalt repair


100%

ØOther~

Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Replaceexisting chlorination system,Filtering system, and filters

Justification: Install efficientfiltration and Chlorinationsystems. Existing equipment isprone to failure causing facilityclosures

Project Funding

Public Benefit: Improved pool Other, $25,000,• . • • 100%sanitation and filtration.

Reduced closures due to• _equipment failures

Project Manager:

Est. Project Cost: = $25000Est. Annual o~s Costs: =

______ PRO3ECT FINANCING

Expenditure Category Prior 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 TotalPlanningDesignROW/Land AcquisitionsConstruction/CE/Contingency $25,000 $25,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000


Project Totals $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000

PRO3ECTED ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS

This project will provide neww efficient equipment that will reduce maintenane costs.

Whitmore Pool Project #Pool Pump Room Updates WPL-3


Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: Providecinder block screening arounddumpsters

--.


Project Manager:

Est. Project Cost: = $6500Est. Annual 01)5 Costs: =


Project Totals $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500


Project Totals so $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $6,500


Whitmore Pool Project #Trash Bin Screening WPL-4



A4)

—~

1..

I ‘III-~

•~_•~_.a.~ ~.j,

.~ ?~-


100%

ØOther~

Prepared: 4/27/2011Project Description: RemodelLocker room showers, lockers,flooring, and restrooms

Justification: Existing facility isnot ADA complaint and is in astate of disrepair.

Public Benefit: Modernacessible facility.

Project Manager:



Project Totals $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000

Funding Source(s)Parks MaintenanceGeneral FundOther siso,ooo $150,000

Project Totals $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000


Projoct will address the following ADA concerns:Signage, Railing, Toilets, Showers, and Mirrors

Whitmore Pool Project #Locker Room Updates WPL-5



100%

0 Other

—~

Town of Mammoth LakesDraft Parks and Recreation Master Plan

r

Prepared for

Town of Mammoth Lakes, California

by

Wallace Roberts & Todd, Inc.

April 14, 2008

Table 1 Existina Town of Mammoth Lakes r~arks and recreation facilities‘-

~— ~ ~— — w~ Co 0~ .~ E.U 0L.Cfl ~ ~ ~E ‘~ ~ 0>~ 0~ ~ ~

C — UZ(flD ~ C Ca).~ ‘~ ~, s o o o ~ o .~c ~ o .~ .~ ~ Other comments, including any changes since 1990 Parks and Recreation

Facility 0 ~ ~ ~) >U ~ C~ ~ Element of the General Plan~ - Contains 2,550-s.f. Community Center with main room, kitchen, BB’Q grill, storage,

and restrooms. Building is used frequently for classes, meetings, and privateCommunity 5.18 -

Center and of 1 6 2 1 gatherings. Building needs some maintenance;playground equipment needsPark 5.18 up.dating for safety concerns; and-tennis courts may need to be fully resurfaced.

: One outdoor horseshoe-pit is available. Adjacent librarybuilding to be surplussed.• - Over 25 parking~spaces for Center; about 15 spaces for tennis courts.

• Parkhas increased from 6 acres in 1990, with the addition of 2 ball fields, I soccer12.52 field~ basketball court, small skate park, snack bar with cooking and cold food

Shady RestPark1 of 2 3 2 2 1 1 30 1 2 - storage; and extra picnic tables. Park is well-used for team sports, programmed12.52 recreation-activities, social gatherings, and as staging for access to Natiànal Forest

V trails nearby.There is parking.for 200, plusadditional unpaved parking:

2.3 New facility since 1990. Large (40,000 s~f.) Volcom Brothers skate park. Paved bikeTrails EndPark of - - 1 1 trailsystém alongedge of park. Parking currently for 26. Playground~and picnic4.11 - V tables expected during Phase 2 improvements.Mammoth 3.5 — — — — V

Creek Park of 6 1 Primarily-used for passive recreation; Mammoth Creek also provides fishingEast1 9.01 — — — — — — — — opportunities. Paved trail along Mammoth Creek is an improvement since 1990.Mammoth 2.0 Park has been improved since 1990 with the addition of play equipment,Creek Park of 1 5 1 landscaping, and restrooms. Paved parking for about 30 vehicles.West1 11.44 — — — — — — — —

Park is about 10 miles from Town. Pool includes 1 swimming pool and 1 wading

10 0 pool, plus changing. rooms with showers. One ball field has been added since 1990.Whitmore Field lights do not work. One field is sized for regulation baseball, used for highPark2 of 3 1 2 1 school games. Other non-school sports teams and clubs also use the park; and the32.64 V pool is programmed additionallyfor- swimming lessons and lap and recreational

V swimming. V

Total 74.90 5 6 6 2 2 1 2 2 45 1 7

These Town facilities are on National Forest Land, covered by a Special Use Permit (see Appendix 3 for Permit). V2 Considered a regional park. Leased from the Los Angeles Department of Power and Water; operated and maintained by the Town of Mammoth Lakes (see Appendix 4 for lease).

Top number is developed park acreage; bottom number is total (gross) park acreage. Total local parkland, which excludes Whitmore Park, is 42.26 acres (28.47 developed acres).

Town of Mammoth Lakes

flV

20

Draft Parks and Recreation Master PlanApril 14,2008

- . “VS~ -

- Shady-Restity, . Park- S CenterPark

F -‘ Sh ResttP Campground (USFS)

S ~2’ ‘ F. - -. --- ~ — . - .~

• ~:‘~ ~. ‘~jI, . ~-~: ~ I~ ~ r

t~., 2 •~•. th S M~ ~ . ‘.fl~sIub’:!”E~e~ chool S

S .5. S ~5 S S. •‘• -

~owse jr reds End toWhdmore

• .. 5 , Use lity

9 .:‘- @~r1~Pd.-~ ~tt:sS.. (east&west)

S -- . e Sierr t~eadowsnLra- ‘~f - - . .~Ec~uestrian Center

S - S ‘ S -Si~.wcreekOutfitters-8 , ~ Ath U •. I-

S ~ egenF ~j~Course

I • L3PubhcS ‘ , ‘“ - ft riving ang -

._i~li’-:.’~ ,;. ~ SILtS A ~~.~ S

is ‘ ‘ —

S~l

o~

~o)~ .Q~~ OWc’~’ ~

~

• ~cI)

- •. -

to Main Lodge

Canyon Lodge~

• Approx Nei~iborhoods per Needs Survey

112 mile radiUs

Urban Gmwth Boundary

PubticlQuasi-public facilities

Draft Parks and Recreation Master PlanApril 14,2008

(0~

FISURE 6

Town ot Marrrmoth Lakes

-18-

Table 15: Potential imDlementation schedule for Darks and recreation facilities*TOML Current Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

LOS (using Additional additional additional additional additional Total2006 TOML facilities facilities facilities facilities facilities facilities

recreation Recommended needed for needed needed 2006- needed 2006- needed 2006- needed bypopn estimate) LOS Standards 2006 LOS 2006-2010. 2015 2020 . 2025 2025

estimated recreation population* 8,406. 9,208 10,196 11,166 12,052 12,052Iocalparklandacreaye** 28.47 5.00 10.48 14.19 18.77 23.26. 27.67 56.14

regional park acreage ** 10 2.5 9.47 11.33 13.62 15.86 1 8.07 28.07facilities in TOML inventory

picnic tables 43 5.69 5 9 15 20 26 69picnicshelters 1 0.56 4 4 5 5 6 7

playgrounds 3 0.36 ~. — — 1 1 1 4park benches 15 1.78 — —. 3 5 7 22tennis courts 6 0.86 — 3 4 4 10

(outdoor) basketball courts (1.12 0 0 0 0 1(sand) volleyball courts 2 — .24 0 0 1 1 3

soccer/multiuse fields 2 — .50 2_ 3 3 4 4 6ball fields (unspecified) — .59 0 ~. 0 1 2 2 7

baseball fields (adult) — .12 0 — 0 0 0 0 1skateboard parks (small) .12 — 0 0 0 0 1skateboard parks (large) 0.12 — 0 0 0 - 0 1

outdoor swimming pool (ea) 1 0.12 0 0 0 0 0 1community center (ea) 1 0.12 0 0 . 0 0 0 1

paved multi-use trails (miles) 9 1.62 4.60 0.60 *** 2.20 *** 377 5.20 *** 19.50potential TOML facilities

outdoorevents venue (acres) 0 1.34 11 12 14 15 16 16band shell/amphitheater (ea) 0 0.10 1 1 1 1 1 1

dog park (ea) 0 0.17 1 2 2 2 2 2potential partner facilities

recreation centers/gyms (ea) 0 0.10 1 1 1 1 1 1recreation centers/gyms (sq if) 0 2,000 16,812 18,416 .. 20,392 22,332 24,104 24,104

ice hockey rink (ea) 0 0.10 1 0 0 . 0 - 0 00.25-mile running track (ea) 0 - 0.10 1 0 0 0 0 0indoor swimming pool (ea) 0 0.05 0 0 - - 1 1 1 1

indoor swimming pool (sq ft) 0 1,000 8,406 9,208 10,196 11,166 12,052 12,052*See page 65 for summary table of population estimates-of permanent residents and “recreation population” due to impactof second homeowners.** Acreage of developed parkiand (excludes undeveloped parkland and open space). Estimates of park acreage needed to meet LOS arebased only on permanent Mammoth Lakesresident population (per Quimby Act). .~** These numbers take into account the 5.3 miles for the Like Mary Road Bicycle Path currently under construction (i.e., each value presented is trail mileage needed beyond existingtrails-and the Lake Mary Road trail). Values may be modified based on the outcome of the updated Mammoth Lakes Trail System Master Plan. .

Town of Mammoth Lakes Draft Parks and Recreation Master PlanApril 14, 2008

-66

Summary of Public Involvement

Because parks and recreation opportunities help define the quality of life in Mammoth Lakes,extensive input was solicited from the public and other key stakeholders, including governmentagencies. This combined input has informed development of this Plan. Public input wasprovided in a series of meetings held specifically for developing this Master Plan, plus publiccomment relevant to parks and recreation from open meetings conducted for updating theTown’s General Plan. In addition, members of the community were invited to participate in asurvey about parks and recreation usage and needs. This section briefly summarizes thediverse input received from the public, agencies, and organizations.

Public Meetings

This Master Plan in part responds to values and needs expressed by the community at publicgatherings. Table 5 summarizes major findings from a public meeting conducted for the TownGeneral Plan update, plus a series of public meetings held specifically for the Parks andRecreation Master Plan. More details on this input are presented in Appendix 7.

Table 5: Summary of comments received at public meetings


Meeting Major Values and NeódsDecember 8, 2003: 1 Performing arts center 7. Conference centerpublic workshop #2 2. Recreation cént’é’r 8. Neighborhood parksfor General Plan 3. Outdoor cdrñmuriity venue 9. Visual arts facility (museum)update—collective 4. More trails . 10. Competitive athletic training facilityranking of different 5. Youth center . 11 Mçre sports fieldsfacilities ~6. Indoor ice rink 12. lnterpretive.center

• Locations & sponsorship of festivals • Need for a recreation center for indoorMarch 5, 2007: • Retain Bell-Shaped Parcel as activities and programs (e~g., senior clubs)public commentsreceived for parks primarily open space with some • Other: need dog park and dog trainingrecreational improvements area; more infohñál turf/play areas; moreand recreationmaster plan • Community Center indoor tot play sheltered picnic areas; indoor badminton

. area: re-use adjacent library . . Explore, variety of funding sourcesMarch 12;2007: • Program needs: Nordic programs • Winter considerations: use of paths onpublic comments • Need for “quiet winter sports” & trails private golf coursesreceived for parks • Integrate TOML parks with • Need a rñülti-use recreation facilityand recreation surrounding public lands; preserve . Funidingthrough yearly passes and visitormaster plan National Fârest access day passes

. Program needs: bettersummer . -. Community Center: re-use adjacent

March 26, 2007: camps: teen programs & center: adult libra~y; staff for daily use and activities:classes: childcarepublic comments • Winter considerations: indoor improve parkingreceived for parks • Other: need places for dogsand recreation programs: indoor-outdoor play areas: • Partnerships: coordinate with County formaster plan family activities

• Trails:improve trail connectivity; programming; u~e of school facilities:connect remote locations partner with Ma’mmoth Nordic

• Parks and rebreation goals should be• Important for facilities to provide for relevant and current: Mammoth is not onlymultiple users and activities a destination resortApril 23, 2007:

public comments • Support for Town collaboration with • Critical tO have faóilities available for year-received for parks ‘ other agencies to provide facilities round and evening useand recreation and programs • Tailor level of service standards tomaster plan • Need parks and recreation to foster Mamn4oth: its unique location,

sense of community and connect seasonality, and populationpeople and the environment • Trails & trail access are very important

- 29 -

Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment Survey

The Town of Mammoth Lakes conducted a survey during March 2007 to evaluate usage of andneeds for parks and recreation facilities and programs. Paper and online surveys were madeavailable to residents of Mammoth Lakes, June Lake, and Crowley Lake, as well as those whohave second homes in Mammoth Lakes. A report detailing the results of the Town’s 2007 Parksand Recreation Facility Needs Assessment Survey is presented in Appendix 14. Highlights ofthe survey’s major findings follow.

Respondent usage rates of parks and recreation facilities demonstrate that Mammoth Lakes is aphysically active community. In addition, the vast majority (77%) indicated that physical fitnessand health were the main benefits they sought from recreation. As a result, parks and recreationfacilities and programming should respond to the community’s propensity for frequent, activerecreation that promotes health and well-being. Use of Town parks shows that lawn areas,picnic facilities, and playgrounds are top outdoor amenities in these parks; the Mammoth CreekTrail system also was a frequently used facility. Because trails were otherwise not included insurvey questions, many respondents used their written comments to express the importance oftrails in their daily life and recreation activities. These results suggest that parks should continueto offer features that accommodate passive outdoor recreation, active children, and socialgatherings, and that trails are an important component of a parks and recreation system.

Second homeowners comprised about 45% of survey respondents. They indicated that theyvisit Mammoth Lakes quite frequently (78% of them visit at least every other month and almostone-third visit once per month, on average). Because the Town’s seasonal and second-homeowner population is so high, and because the second homeowners visit so often, parksand recreation facilities should have the capacity to accommodate these users.

Regarding needs for facilities and programs, it is important to note that nearly half (47%) of allrespondehts use an indoor athletic club (42.6% üse.Snowcrèek Athletic Club, and another 4.3%use The Body Shop). This. suggests that indoor recreation, centers (including private healthclubs, yoga businesses, etc.) are an important component of recreation and fitness for people inMammoth Lakes; and that an additional recreation center would be welcome—especially if itprovides facilities and programs desired by residents and visitors. Although the survey did notask directly about the need for a recreation center per se, it did ask about more specificamenities and pr6grams, some of which could be integrated in a recreation center. ~Whenexamined in greater detail, responses to questiOns about needed facilities and programsindicate the following “first tier” and “second tier~’ needs (based on priority rankings andexpression of need vs. no need) shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Top recreation needs (facility and proqram) resulting from Needs Assessment SurveyFacility Needs Program Needs

First Tier Second Tier First Tier Second Tier

Performing arts center Indoor running track Hiking, backpacking, Bicycling programsmountaineering, climbingBefore & after schoolDog park New tennis courts Fitness center & aerobics programs

Band shell Senior facilities Holiday/seasonal celebrations camps during school recess& fairs and vacationNew aquatic facilities New picnic facilities Yoga, meditation, stress relief Senior programsNew open grass areas Teen/youth club Science & nature instruction Pre-school care


- 30 -

Summary of Written Comments

The 2007 Parks and Recreation Facility Needs Assessment Suivey gave respondents theopportunity to provide additional written comments about the existing and future parks andrecreation system. A complete listing of these comments (verbatim) is provided at the end ofthis report. The following points summarize the majority of comments regarding the existingparks and recreation system:

• Existing TQML parks and recreation facilities are very much appreciated, and there isconcern that existing facilities be well-maintained before new facilities are added.

• Although parks and recreation facilities are considered important, it is also desirable tomaintain undeveloped openspace in the Town. V V

• A comprehensive and connected trail systemis critical to recreation and quality of life forresidents and visitors. Key concerns include:

o Availability of trails for use both summer and winter V

o Balancing needs to have some trails in winter groomed for cross-country skiersand othérsclearéd for pedestrians V V V

o Addressing conflicts between motorized and non-motorized trail use• Provision Of indoor recreation facilities is very desirable, especially for winter and evening

activities. V

• An ice rink is a welcome fability, although there is concern that fair access should beprovided for recreational (i.e., non-team) skaters. V

• There should be improved information: V

o Let people know abôÜt the availability of facilities, programs, and eventso Improve parks and trail signage V

o Educate dog owners about leash and clean-up poliôies• It is importaht to accommOdate age-speciflc concerns: V

o Activities and Winter play areas (both indoor and outdoor) for small childreno Safe places and programs for pré-teens and teenagers outside of schoOlo Programs geared for active seniors


-185

Conclusions and Implications for Parks and Recreation

Respondent usage rates of parks and recreation facilities demonstrate that Mammoth Lakes isan active community. In addition, the vast majority (77%) indicated that physical fitness andhealth were the main benefits they sought from recreation. As a result, parks and recreationfacilities and programming should respond to the community’s propensity for frequent, activerecreation that promotes health and well-being.

Use of existing Town parks shows that lawn areas, picnic facilities, and playgrounds are topoutdoor amenities in these parks; the Mammoth Creek Trail system (an amenity noted inQuestion 13D) also was a frequently used facility. Because trails were otherwise not included insurvey questions, many respondents used their written comments to express the importance oftrails in their daily life and recreation activities. These results suggest that parks should continueto offer features that accommodate passive outdoor recreation, active children, and socialgatherings, and that trails are an important component of parks.

Second homeowners comprised a large portion of survey respondents. They indicated that theyvisit Mammoth Lakes quite frequently (78% visit at least every other month and almost one-thirdvisit once per month, on average). Because the Town’s seasonal and éecond-homeownerpopulation is so high, and because the second homeownersvisit so often, parks and recreationfacilities should accommodate their needsas well as permanent residents.

Regarding needs for facilities and programs, it is important, to note that nearly half (47%) of allrespondents use an indoor athletic club (42.6% use SnowcreekAthlétic Club, and another 4.3%use The Body Shop). This suggests that indoor recreation centers are an important componentof recreation and fitness for people in Mammoth Lakes, and that an addition~l recreation centerwould be welcome—especially if it providesfacilities and programs desired by residents andvisitors. When examined in greater detail, responses to questions about needed facilities andprograms indicate the following “first tier” and “second tier’ needs (based on priárity rankingsand expression of heed vs. no need) shown be!ow in Table 1.

Table 1: Top facility and program needs, as expressed by respondents to initial needsassessment survey

Facilit Needs Program NeedsFirst Tier Second Tier First Tier Second TierDog park New aquatic facilities Hiking, backpacking, Pre-school care

mountaineering,climbing

Performing arts Indoor running track Fitness center & Before and aftercenter aerobics school programsBand shell Tennis courts Holiday/seasonal Science and nature

celebrations & fairs instructionNew open grass Senior programsareas


- 186

Based on results from the “second wave” survey that was distributed through the schools, thefacility and program needs are similar to those listed in the table above, although there is somevariation. This can be expected because the second wave respondents comprise exclusivelyfamilies with school-aged children, who also live in the area year-round. It is also important torecall that this survey group is much smaller than the initial group (90 “second wave”respondents vs. 580 initial respondents). The results for the “second wave” survey group aresummarized in Table 2 below.

Table 2: Top facility and program needs, as expressed by respondents to “second wave”survey

Facilit Needs Program NeedsFirst Tier Second Tier First Tier Second TierNew aquatic Teen/youth club Fitness center & Hiking, backpacking,facilities aerobics mountaineering,

climbingPerforming arts New soccer fields Holiday/seasonal Dance instructioncenter celebrations & fairsBand shell New playgrounds Before and after Music instruction

school programsDog park Indoor running track Camps during school Pre-school care

recess and vacation

When data from both initial and “second wave” surveys are combined, Table 3 below showsFirst Tier and Second Tier needs for facilities and programs, based on expression of needversus no need, as well as priority ranking.

Table 3: Top facility and program needs for combined survey results

Facilit Needs Program NeedsFirst Tier Second Tier First Tier Second TierPerforming arts Indoor running track Hiking, backpacking, Bicycling programscenter mountaineering,

climbingDog park New tennis courts Fitness center & Before and after

aerobics school programsBand shell Senior facilities Holiday/seasonal Camps during school

celebrations & fairs recess and vacationNew aquatic New picnic facilities Yoga, meditation, Senior programsfacilities stress reliefOpen grass areas Teen/youth club Science and nature Pre-school care

instruction


- 187

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA MAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION …

Documents

Transcript of SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA MAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION …