Special Considerations for Clinical Trials in the ...

73
Special Considerations for Clinical Trials in the Paediatric Population Psychosocial, Medicinal, Scientific, and Organizational Challenges Reinhard Feneberg Paediatric Unit KKS Heidelberg

Transcript of Special Considerations for Clinical Trials in the ...

Special Considerations for Clinical Trialsin the Paediatric Population

Psychosocial, Medicinal, Scientific,and Organizational Challenges

Reinhard FenebergPaediatric Unit

KKS Heidelberg

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 2

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 3

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 4

The best wayto give advice to your children isto find out what they want andthen advise them to do it

(H. S. Truman)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 5

• Psychological• Legal• Ethical

• ... Child‘s perspective

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 6

Development of Children

• School age: Ability to understandexplanations regarding own body, medication, studies (immense increaseof understanding in the first years in school)

• Different theoretical approaches:– Theory of cognitive development (Piaget)– Information psychology

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 7

Cognitive development (Piaget)

sensorimotor

preoperational

concrete operations

formal operations

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 8

Aspects of information psychology

• Piaget:rough classification, but:

• Children developknowledge in conjunctionwith their experiences

• Example: Chronically illchildren

• Development depends as well on availableinformation!

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 9

Influences on Development

• Social rank• Intelligence• Previous experience (e.g., history of illness)• Relationship with parents• Information• Diseases• Peer group• etc.

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 10

Aspects of Capability for Consent

• Criteria according to Coester– Maturity– Power of judgement– Critical faculties– Freedom of choice

• Situational aspects (Fegert 2000)– Psychopathology– Experience of chronically ill children

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 11

Aspects of Capability for Consent

• Effects on capability for consent– Adapted approach for checking capability for

consent– Information adapted to stage of disease

• Effects on compliance– Without informed consent:

– little compliance, cooperation, and collaboration– little chances for reliable and valid data

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 12

The Need to Participate

• Need to participate increases with age• < 14 yrs: others should decide most frequent• > 14 yrs: desire to participate most frequent• Participation is important – not the actual decision• Consideration of participation needs has positive long

term effects on therapy motivation• (Wiethoff et al. 2002)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 13

Voice effect

• Opportunity to participate in decisionmaking process raises the perceivedfairness, even if there is no control of the final decision

• The right to a say leads to higheracceptance and commitment to consequences of the decision

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 14

Asymmetries

• Gradient of knowledge: physician, parents, child• Considerable responsibility of parents

– Attention after separation and joint custody: (Informedconsent MUST be signed by both legal custodians)

• Role conflict of physician: „objective researcher“ vs. „considerate caretaker“

• And: Dependencies in hospital hierarchy

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 15

Conflicts of interest

• Parents are interested in the very best treatment of their child and do not want to endanger a trustful relationship with theirphysician

• Children are often anxious and need specificinformation about the course of the study and age adapted information concerningfundamental questions

• Conflict of interest between parents and children possible (e.g., maladjustment)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 16

A little bit exaggerated ...

• Parents seem to be becomingincreasingly reluctang to enrolltheir children in basic researchwith no perceivable immediate benefit (Appelbaum et al. ACT 2003)

• Informed Consent, ein kinderfeindliches Konzept? (Rothärmel et al. Medizinrecht 2000)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 17

Consent and Assent

• Consent of parents always along with assentof child

• Specific information for children:– development– requirements of study– specific for disease („expert“ knowledge of

chronically ill children)– Legal and ethical aspects, in particular veto

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 18

Mac CAT Interview

• Grisso and Applebaum 1998

• Qualitative interview to assess ability forconsent and assent

• Ethical: helpful for the decision aboutinclusion of patient

• Legal: documentation of capability fordecision of patient

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 19

General Problems

• General ethical obligation to protect minors

• Fundamental problem:

In contrast to adults, minors may not providelegally binding consent

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 20

Right to a say of the child?

• Therefore:Consent of parents or legal guardians necessary

• Consent (or non-consent) has to consider the child‘spresumed will

• The minor has to receive information according to his/her developmental status by persons withpedagogical experience

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 21

„Legal“ Age Groups

• Consent– > 18 yrs. (full legal age)– > 12 - 15 yrs. ability to decide independently

• Assent– EU: defined by EC– AAP: > 7 yrs.

• Dissent– 5 - 7 yrs.

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 22

Documentation Problems ...

• Documentation of assent?

• Participants of appropriate intellectualmaturity should personally sign and date either a separately designed written assentform or the written informed consent ...

• (ICH Topic E11: Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the PaediatricPopulation)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 23

How to to interprete and document?

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 24

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 25

ICH E 11, 2.6.3.

• Although a participant‘s wish to withdraw froma study must be respected, there may becircumstances in therapeutic studies forserious or life-threatening diseases in which, in the opinion of the investigator and parents(s)/legal guardian, the welfare of a pediatric patient would be jeopardized by his or her failing to participate in the study.

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 26

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 27

ICH E 11, 2.6.3.• In this situation, continued parental

(legal guardian) consent should besufficient to allow participation in thestudy.

Adults and minors- double standards???

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 28

Verständnis und Consent

• Does informedconsent to research requirecomprehension?(Sreenivasan G, Lancet 2003, 362:2016-2018)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 29

The View of the PersonsConcerned

• Why do children participate in clinicalstudies?

• Hope to receive improved treatment (52%)• Altruism (38%)• Financial incentives (51%)• Recommendation of others (44%)

• (Niles, ACT 2003)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 30

The View of the PersonsConcerned

Satisfaction Again?

„much betterthan expected“

63% „definitelyconsider“

49%

„somewhatbetter than exp.“

6% „maybeconsider“

25%

„as good asexpected“

20% „definitely notconsider“

19%

„somewhatworse as exp.“

0% „don’t know“ 7%

„don’t know“ 11%

Niles, ACT 2003

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 31

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 32

If you bungle raising your children,I don‘t thinkwhatever else you do wellmatters very much

(Anonymous)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 33

Efficacy of drugs is influenced by different developmental stages:

•anatomical•physiological•biochemical•behavioural

charakteristics

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 34

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 35

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 36

Physiology (I)

• Maturation of brain, persistent fetal circulation

• (Relatively) large body surface area• High percentage of body water• Immature blood brain barrier• Narrow respiratory tract• Immune system

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 37

Physiology (II)

GI tractLower motilityProlonged gastric passagehigher gastric pH

Plasma proteinsfetal albumin

higher percentage of body water(> 75% in children, 50-55% in adults)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 38

Maturation of CYP in Liver

< 30 weeks

> 30 weeks< 24 hours

1-7 days8-28 days

1-3 months3-12 months

> 1 yearadults

3A7 2D6 2E1 3A4

2C8 / 9 / 18 / 19 1A2

(Cresteil T.; Food Addit Contam 1998)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 39

Maturation of Renal Function

Max. tubuläre PAH- Sekretionskapazität(mg/min/1.73 m²)

(modifiziert nach Boreus LO; 1982)

Nierengewicht

GFR (mL/min/1.73 m²)

12 y

ears

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

neon

ate

2 m

o

6 m

o8

mo

9 ye

ars

3 ye

ars

adul

ts

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 40

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 41

PharmacokineticsLiberation (L ADME)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 42

PharmacokineticsAbsorption ( LADME)

(Gladtke E; Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1979)

Sulfisomidin - concentration vs time

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 43

Basal and stimulated secretion of gastric acid

(Stewart CF and Hampton EM; Clin Pharm 1987)

basal secretion

stimulated secretion(pentagastrin)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 44

PharmacokineticsDistribution ( LADME)

(Friis-Hansen B; Pediatrics 1961)

Extracellular fluid compartments

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 45

PharmacokineticsMetabolismus ( LADME)

reduced hepatic metabolic capacity

•Enzymes of oxidative metabolism:t1/2 of diazepampreterm: 80-400 h, children: ˜ 12 h

•Glucuronisation

alternative metabolic pathways

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 46

PharmacokineticsExkretion ( LADME)

Reduced renal elimination

– lower GFR in newborns– e.g., t1/2 of penicillin prolonged

– development of tubular secretion

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 47

Endpoints

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 48

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 49

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 50

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 51

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 52

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 53

Never have ideas about children –and never have ideas for them

(D. H. Lawrence)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 54

Death Rates by Age

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 55

Cancer:Age distribution

of deaths

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 56

Onset of Diabetes

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 57

Hypertension by AgeWhat is Missing?

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 58

But:

• 1% – 10% of all pediatric patients suffer fromhigh blood pressure

• only 10% of these correctly diagnosed

• Consequences (??)Up to now, no approval for anyantihypertensive agent for children in Germany

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 59

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 60

Variation of Half Life

0

2

4

6

Tolbut

amid

Carba

maz

epin

Pheny

toin

Theop

hyllin

Diazep

amPhe

nylbu

tazo

n

Adults Children Newborn

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 61

Dilemma

• Many pediatric participants for clinicalstudies required– 5 different age groups (ICH E 11)

– Higher variability

• Fewer patients available

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 62

www.paed-net.org

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 63

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 64

Large organizationis loose organization.Nay, it would be almost as true to saythat organization isalways disorganization.

(G. K. Chesterton)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 65

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 66

Epidemiology:Overweight

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 67

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 68

% lactose intolerant

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 69

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 70

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 71

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 72

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 73

Thank you!