Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  ·...

12
Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in Response to Mosquito Ditching Andrew J. Paolucci University of Rhode Island Department of Natural Resources Science NRS 533 Final Project 12/5/2012

Transcript of Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  ·...

Page 1: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in Response to

Mosquito Ditching

Andrew J. Paolucci

University of Rhode Island

Department of Natural Resources Science

NRS 533 Final Project

12/5/2012

Page 2: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Introduction

Salt marshes are biologically productive ecosystems that provide nursery habitat for

wildlife, and play an important role in pollution control and nutrient cycling. Predicting and

understanding the consequences of anthropogenic disturbances on salt marsh patterns and

processes has become a popular topic in salt marsh ecology because these systems are rapidly

degrading (Bertness et al., 2002).

There is no single answer to the cause of landscape patterns in today’s world. The

patterns we view are a result of multiple abiotic and biotic factors, processes, interactions, and

disturbances (Turner et al., 2001). In New England salt marshes, competition and plant

physiological tolerances create distinct zones of plant cover (Bertness and Ellison, 1987). The

low marsh is inundated by daily high tides and is dominated by a salt tolerant species known as

Spartina alterniflora. The portion of the marsh that is only flooded during extreme high tides, the

high marsh, is composed of less salt tolerant species such as Spartina patens. (Bertness, 1992).

Although species competition and plant tolerances explain salt marsh vegetation patterns

in an undisturbed system, most of the patterns we see today are directly influenced by

anthropogenic alterations to the habitat. New England salt marsh vegetation patterns have been

influenced by disturbances such as tidal restrictions, ditching, filling and dredging, sea level rise,

and nutrient loading (Donnelly and Bertness, 2001; Lesser, 1976; Wigand et al. 2009). This

paper focuses on the effects of mosquito ditching and sea level rise on salt marsh vegetation

cover patterns.

Objective

Our first hypothesis was that mosquito ditches effect vegetation composition by altering

the substrate salinity regime. In ditches subject to tidal fluctuations, levees may develop from the

ditching spoil piles or accretion from receding tides. The levees prevent the lateral movement of

water through the marsh, and in extreme cases convert adjacent areas of vegetation to a panne or

a permanent pool (Miller and Egler, 1950). Salt marsh pannes are bare patches of hypersaline

soil where most plant growth is inhibited. Within these pannes are patches of Salicornia

europaea, a species which can withstand hypersaline environments (Bertness, 1992). Pools are

similar to pannes except they are deeper and contain standing water throughout the dry months

(NHDFL Staff, 2012).

The second hypothesis of this study was that the percent cover of pools and pannes

within a salt marsh is correlated to the density of ditches. Previous studies indicate that remote

sensing has been a useful strategy for monitoring and mapping salt marsh habitat (Belluco et al.,

2006, Zhange et al., 1997). Our goal was to map the extent of ditches, pools, and pannes along

the fringe marshes of the Narrow River using a Geographic Information System (ArcGIS

Version 10.0) and high resolution aerial photography to determine if a relationship between

pool/panne area and ditching exists.

Page 3: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Since pools and pannes often form in very poorly drained depressions in the marsh, we

predicted that sea level rise has increased the extent of pools and pannes within the Narrow River

fridge salt marshes (NHDFL Staff, 2012). In order to test this hypothesis, the extent of

pools/pannes were compared between the RIGIS digital aerial photography from 1951-1952 and

the RIGIS RIDEM 2011 multispectral digital orthophotography.

Methods

Study Site

The Narrow River, also known as the Pettaquamscutt River is an estuary located in

southern Rhode Island (Appendix figure 1). The estuary stretches about 9.5 kilometers parallel to

Narragansett Bay and discharges at Narragansett State Beach (RIRC Staff, 2012). Along the

fridge of The Narrow River are patches of salt marsh located on Pawcatuck and Matunuck soils.

Matunuck soils consist of an organic layer, 0 to 30 centimeters thick, overlying sandy marine or

glaciofluvial deposits (Soil Survey Staff, 2012). Pawcatuck soils consist of 40 to 130 centimeters

of organic deposits overlying sandy marine or glaciofluvial deposits (2012). In order to

determine the effects of ditching on vegetation composition, three ditches were chosen for

analysis. Each ditch was chosen based on visual interpretation of vegetation cover, and

morphological characteristics such as ditch width, length, and depth.

Vegetation and Soil Sampling

At each study site, vegetation and soil samples were gathered along two transects. Samples were

taken at the ditch bank and at 1, 5, 15, and 30 meters from the ditch edge (Appendix figure 2).

Percent cover of each plant species and bare soil was determined using a 0.25 meter2

quadrat.

Surface soil samples (0 to 5 cm) were taken using a McCaulay peat sampler and transported

inside an iced cooler from the field to the laboratory. Soil salinity was determined using a

saturated paste method (NRCS Staff, 2004). A 1:5 ratio was made with 5 grams of fresh soil and

distilled water. After allowing the mixture to settle, electrical conductivity (EC) at 25.0 oC was

determined using an Oakton Con 10 handheld electrical conductivity meter (Model: 35607-00,

Oakton Instuments, IL, USA). EC(25)1:5 was reported to the nearest 0.1 dS m-1

.

Pool and Panne Mapping

Marsh units were delineated in ArcGIS using the RIGIS 2012 USDA/NRCS SSURGO soil

polygon dataset. Ditches, pannes, and pools were delineated at 1:2000 scale using the RIGIS

2011 RIDEM multispectral digital orthophotography and the RIGIS 1951-1952 digital

photography (Appendix figures 2 and 3). The extent of the morphological features mapped in

this study were ground truthed on November 15th

to ensure accuracy of the delineations.

Page 4: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Statistical Analysis

The soil salinity and percent cover of Spartina patens, Spartina alterniflora, and bare soil at each

transect location was analyzed using SigmaPlot statistical software (version 11.2.05; Systat

Software, San Jose, CA). Significant differences (P<.0.05) in vegetation composition was

determined using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A 2nd

order polynomial regression

was used to determine if a relationship exists between mean soil salinity and distance from ditch

for each transect. The total area of marsh units, total length of ditches, total area of pools and

pannes were determined using the Calculate Geometry function in ArCGIS. Using a random

subsample (n=10) of the marsh units, a linear regression was used to determine if a relationship

between meters of ditch per march unit area (ditch density) and total area of pools and pannes

per marsh unit area (percent pool/panne area).

Discussion

Impact of mosquito ditches on vegetation patterns

Distinct vegetation patterns were seen surrounding ditched areas of the Narrow River salt

marshes in both aerial photographs and during field sampling. There was a significant difference

between the percent cover of bare soil and Spartina patens between sampling locations

(DF=4/25 F=9.223 P<0.001). The amount of bare soil was greater in areas further away from the

ditch. Patens dominated the areas 1 to 5 meters from the ditch, but along the edge of the ditch,

and greater than 5 meters away, contained mostly Spartina alterniflora (Appendix graph 1). We

predict that these vegetation patterns could exist because of the natural levees formed on the

banks of the ditch by receding tiding and human transported material the ditch construction.

Topographic surveying is required in order to confirm this hypothesis.

Impact of mosquito ditching on soil salinity

Soil salinity increased from the edge of the ditch to 15 meters at five out of the six transects

(Appendix graph 2). The 30 meter samples exhibited lower or similar salinities than the

corresponding sample locations. It may be that these areas have lower salinities due to micro

relief within the salt marsh. Therefore we recommend surveying these sites to determine any

correlations between elevation and salinity.

Relationship between ditch density and percent pool area

Along the Narrow River there is a total of 5830 meters of ditches and 120,543 square meters of

pools and pannes (Appendix table 1). No relationship existed between ditch density and percent

pool area with the marsh unit subsamples. It is clear in areas where grid ditching has occurred

such as Winnapaug Pond in Charlestown, Rhode Island that ditching spoil piles and levees

formed by sediment accretion form shallow pools on the marsh surface. Along the Narrow River

the soils have thicker organic horizons and were not subject to intense grid ditching (Soil Survey

Page 5: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Staff, 2012). The difference in soil properties such as thickness of peat or the land use history

could be the explanation for the negative relationship between ditch density and pool/panne area.

Change in total pool and panne area since 1952

Based on the data collected using remote sensing imagery the extent of pools and pannes has

increased by 973 square meters since 1952 (Appendix table 2). Over the last 60 years the number

of pools and pannes has increased by 470%. Mean pool/panne area decreased from 1952 to 2011.

This decrease could be the due to errors during the delineation of the pool units. Since

multispectral orthophotography was used for the 2011 analysis the delineation of the polygons

was more precise. The pools and pannes were harder to distinguish using black and white

photography and ground truthing the data was not possible.

Conclusion

This study proved that remote sensing can be a valuable resource for determining vegetation

patterns and anthropogenic footprints on the landscape. Although the results of this study were

mostly unsuccessful, this research supports the notion that resolution effects accuracy in

landscape pattern analysis. We are determined to conduct more field sampling and remote

sensing in order to fully evaluate the impacts of mosquito ditching on soil and vegetation

characteristics.

Page 6: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

References

Belluco E., M. Camuffo, S. Ferrari, L. Modenese, S. Silvestri, A. Marani, & M. Marani. 2006.

Mapping salt-marsh vegetation by multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing.

Remote Sensing of Environment, Volume 105, No. 1 pp. 54–67.

Bertness, M.D., 1992. The Ecology of a New England Salt Marsh. American Scientist, Vol. 80,

NO. 3, pp. 260-268.

Bertness, M.D. and A.M. Ellison. 1987. Determinants of Pattern in a New England Salt Marsh

Plant Community. Ecological Monographs, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 129-147

Bertness, M.D., P. Ewanchuk, and B.R. Silliman. 2002 Anthropogenic modification of New

England salt marsh landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the

United States of America. Vol. 99, pp. 1395-98.

Donnelly, J.P. & M.D. Bertness. 2001. Rapid shoreward encroachment of salt marsh cordgrass in

response to accelerated sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

of the United States of America. Vol. 98 No. 25 pp. 14218-14223.

Lesser, C.R., F. J. Murphey, and R. W. Lake. 1976. Some effects of grid system mosquito

control ditching on salt marsh biota in Delaware. Mosquito News Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 69-

77.

New Hampshire Division of Forests and Lands (NHDFL). 2012. Natural Communities of NH

Photo Guide: Salt panes and pools. Concord, NH. Web. 4 December 2012. URL:

http://www.nhdfl.org/about-forests-and-lands/bureaus/natural-heritage-bureau/photo-

index/salt-pannes-and-pools.aspx

RIGIS. 2002. 1951-1952 Digital Aerial Photographs. Rhode Island Geographic Information

System (RIGIS) Data Distribution System, URL: http://www.edc.uri.edu/rigis

RIGIS, 2011. 2011 RIDEM Multispectral Orthophotography of Rhode Island. Rhode Island

Geographic Information System (RIGIS) Data Distribution System, URI:

http://www.edc.uri.edu/rigis

Rhode Island Rivers Council (RIRC). 2012 Narrow River Watershed. Providence, RI. Web. 4

December 2012. URI:

http://www.ririvers.org/wsp/Watersheds/NarrowRiverWatershed.htm#

Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), United States Department

of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Web. 4 December 2012. URL:

http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.

Page 7: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Turner M. G., Gardner R. H., and R. V. O’Neill. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and

Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer-Verland, New York, New York, USA. pp. 71-92

Zhang, M., S. L. Ustin, E. Rejmankova, and E. W. Sanderson. 1997. Monitoring Pacific coast

salt marshes using remote sensing. Ecological Applications. Vol. 7 pp. 1039-1053

Page 8: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Appendix

Figure 1: Study Location. Narrow River, RI.

Figure 2: Transect sampling scheme.

Page 9: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Figure 3: Extent of pools and pannes (red polygons) delineated using RIGIS 2011 RIDEM

multispectral orthophotography.

Page 10: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Figure 4: Extent of pools and pannes (red polygons) delineated using RIGIS 1951-1952 digital

photography.

Page 11: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

Graph 1: Vegetation composition and bare soil were determined as percent cover using a 0.25

square meter quadrat. Other species were identified during sampling. Spartina sp. and bare soil

percent cover were analyzed because they were the most common.

Graph 2: Soil salinity was represented as electric conductivity(EC1:5) at 25 degrees Celsius.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Pe

rce

nt

Co

ver

(%)

Distance from ditch (meters)

Vegetation Cover

0 1 5 15 30 0 1 5 15 30 0 1 5 15 30

Spartina alterniflora Spartina patens Bare soil

y = -0.22x2 + 1.555x + 1.5708 R² = 0.8372

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 1 5 15 30

Soil

Salin

ity

EC

25(

1:5

)

Distance From Ditch (m)

Horizon #1 EC25(1:5)

Mean

Poly. (Mean)

Page 12: Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes …€¦ ·  · 2016-10-27Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in ...

2011 Narrow River Marsh Statistics

Total area of marsh units(km2) 98.3

Mean marsh unit area (m2) 32765.0

Number of marsh units 30

Total length of ditches(m2) 5830.2

Mean ditch length (m2) 46.6

Number of ditches 125

Total density of ditches (m/km2) 0.005931

Total cover of 2011 pannes and pools (%) 12.27356

Table 1: Landscape level metrics for the study location. All metrics were determined using the

Calculate Statistics function in ArcGIS.

Total pool/panne area (m2)

Mean pool/panne area

(m2)

Number of pool/panne

areas

1951-1952 119670.1783 383.5582638 309

2011 120643.0109 82.68883544 1459

Change 972.8326 -300.8694283 1150

Table 2: Change in landscape level metrics between 1951 and 2011. Data was obtained using

1951 and 2011 RIGIS aerial photography..