Spatial and Spectral Evaluation of Image Fusion Methods

download Spatial and Spectral Evaluation of Image Fusion Methods

If you can't read please download the document

description

Spatial and Spectral Evaluation of Image Fusion Methods. Sascha Klonus Manfred Ehlers Institute for Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing University of Osnabrück. Content. Introduction Image Fusion Test Site Fusion Results Color Distortions Evaluation Methods and Results Ehlers Fusion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Spatial and Spectral Evaluation of Image Fusion Methods

  • Spatial and Spectral Evaluation of Image Fusion Methods

    Sascha KlonusManfred Ehlers

    Institute for Geoinformatics and Remote SensingUniversity of Osnabrck

  • ContentIntroduction Image Fusion

    Test Site

    Fusion Results

    Color Distortions

    Evaluation Methods and Results

    Ehlers Fusion

    Conclusions and Future Work

  • Data Fusion: Why is it Necessary?Remote sensors have different spatial resolution for panchromatic and multispectral imagery

    The ratios vary between 1:2 and 1:5

    For multisensor fusion the ratios can exceed 1:30 (e.g. Ikonos/Landsat)

  • Objectives of Image FusionSharpen imagesImprove geometric correctionsProvide stereo-viewing capabilitiesEnhance certain features Complement data setsDetect changesSubstitute missing information Replace defective data

    Pohl & van Genderen (1998)

  • Meaning of Pan-SharpeningSpatialSpectral +panchromatic &high geometric resolutionmulti-/hyperspectral image &low geometric resolutionmulti-/hyperspectral &high geometric resolution

  • Fusion MethodsColor TransformationsModified IHS Transformation

    Statistical MethodsPrincipal Component Merge

    Numerical MethodsBroveyCN Spectral SharpeningGram-Schmidt Spectral Sharpening Wavelet based Fusion

    Combined MethodsEhlers Fusion

  • Test Site

  • Original DataQuickbird Multispectral image (2004-09-04)Quickbird Panchromatic image (2004-09-04)

    Formosat Multispectral image (2004-01-30)Ikonos Multispectral image (2005-08-03)

  • Single Sensor Fusion: QuickbirdQuickbird Multispectral imageFused with BroveyFused with CN Spectral SharpeningFused with EhlersFused with WaveletFused with Gram-Schmidt Fused with PCFused with modified IHS

  • Multisensor Fusion: IkonosIkonos Multispectral imageFused with BroveyFused with CN Spectral SharpeningFused with EhlersFused with modified IHSFused with PCFused with Gram-Schmidt Fused with Wavelet

  • Multisensor Fusion: FormosatFormosat Multispectral imageFused with BroveyFused with CN Spectral SharpeningFused with EhlersFused with modified IHSFused with PCFused with Gram-Schmidt Fused with Wavelet

  • Fusion Problem: Color DistortionPanchromatic band has a different spectral sensitivity

    Multisensoral differences (e.g. Ikonos and SPOT merge)

    Multitemporal (seasonal) changes between pan and ms image dataInconsistent panchromatic information is fused into the multispectral bands

  • Spectral Comparison Methods (1) Visual (Structure and Colour Preservation)

  • Results RMSE

  • Results Correlation Coefficients

  • Spectral Comparison Methods (2)Per Pixel DeviationDegradeDegraded to ground resolution of original image (Formosat = 8m)Original multispectral image (Formosat 8m)Result: Vector containing the deviation per pixelFused image (Formosat 2m)

    Band 12.56Band 22.92Band 33.49Band 43.35

  • Mean Per Pixel Deviation

  • Spatial Comparison Methods (1)Edge Detection---

    Band 191.16 %Band 292.10 %Band 392.64 %Mean91.96 %

  • Results Edge Detection

  • Spatial Comparison Methods (2)Highpass FilteringCorrelation

    Band 10.8012Band 20.7820Band 30.7912Mean0.7918

  • Highpass Correlation Results

  • FFT Filter Based Data Fusion (Ehlers Fusion)Panchromatic ImageMultispectral ImageBasis: IHS Transform and Filtering in the Fourier Domain

  • Panchromatic image and its spectrumOriginal panchromatic imagePanchromatic Spectrum

  • Filtersetting effectsFiltered Panchromatic Spectrum

  • Effects in the spatial domainFiltered panchromatic imageFused image

  • Filtersetting effectsFiltered Panchromatic Spectrum

  • Effects in the spatial domainFiltered panchromatic imageFused image

  • Filtersetting effectsFiltered Panchromatic Spectrum

  • Effects in the spatial domainFiltered panchromatic imageFused image

  • ResultsEhlers Fusion shows the best overall results in all images

    It works also if the panchromatic Information does not match the spectral sensitivity of the merged bands (multitemporal and multisensoral fusion)

    Its performance is superior to standard fusion techniques (IHS, Brovey Transform, PC Merge)

    Wavelet preserves the spectral characteristics at the cost of spatial improvement

    Ehlers Fusion is integrated in a commercial image processing system (Erdas Imagine 9.1)

  • Future WorkFusion of radar- and optical Data

    Development of one method to evaluate the spatial and spectral quality of an fused image

    Comparison with the algorithm of Zhang (PCI Geomatica)

    Research on automation for filter design

  • Thanks for your Attention

    Questions???

  • Ehlers Fusion Program

  • Ehlers Fusion Program

  • Ehlers Fusion Program

  • Ehlers Fusion Program

  • Ehlers Fusion Program

  • Multispectral image and its spectrumOriginal multispectral intensityMultispectral intensity spectrum

  • Filtersetting effectsFiltered multispectral spectrum

  • Filtersetting effectsFiltered multispectral spectrum

  • Filtersetting effectsFiltered multispectral spectrum

    Sharpen imagesImprove geometric correctionsProvide stereo-viewing capabilities for stereophotogrammetryEnhance certain features not visible in either of the single data aloneComplement data sets for improved classificationDetect changes using multitemporal imagesSubstitute missing information in one image with signals from another sensor imageReplace defective data

    4th September 2004, for Ikonos the 30th January 2004, for Formosat the 3rd August 2005