Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data...

82

Transcript of Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data...

Page 1: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 2: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 3: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

IKTReSDDUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I XETWODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . STKTISTICAS, RELIBILITY 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS 3

Timberland Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Softwood Biomass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Hardwood Biomass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Forest T p e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Diameter Class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Tkee Class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

. . . . . . . Species ...............................*...*.... 3 LITERATURE CITED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 mPENDIXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

,@ PENDIX 1. --Definitions of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 MPENDBX 2 . -- Species List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 APPENDIX 3. ---- Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -10

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -WPENDIX 4 . ---- Figures 73

Page 4: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

K A N

Figure I.-East Oklaii.nnta counties.

Page 5: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

The Woody Biomass &source o f East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr.

Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey o f the 18 eastern counties were US& to derive esdim&es of wood and bark biomass by counties (fig, I). The information is important to resource managers, le@slators, polieymakers, and procurement specialists in regard to the extent, location, and potential availabil- ity of the woody biomass resource in the State, The survey i s d e s i ~ d to produce reliable estimates at the State level, To provide flexibility in anaBysis, however, information is presented by individual counties . Subse- quentIy9 users may combine county statistics for their particular area of interest. Jii-i~rly reliable estimates will result from ageegations of several counties (see statis- died reliability section). Mamidude of standard errors dictates no& using these data on a county-by-county basis.

Wood and bark biomass estimates for all trees on timberland are summarized in this report, The resource is described by dimension (size), forest type, ~wnership, species, stand attributes, and tree merchan- tability class. Shrub and herbaceous vegetation data were not inreludd in these estimates, Nso, only esti- mates pertaining do timberland acreage were included. Definitions of terms are gven in appendix 1. A species List of all trees occurring in the sample, alphabetized by scientific name, i s gven in appendix 2.

All 62 resource tables are presented in appendix 3. Tables 1 through 4 describe timberland area by owner- ship class, forest type paup, shancl-size class, and basal area class, respectivelye T&les 5 through 63. describe the biomass resource of spxies pmp by ccscaxlty (5-71, ownership elass by cmn-ty (8-131, hrest t p e g o u p by county (14-191, ownership class by forest t_vgae s o u p (20-251, diameter class by species 126---3E), diameter class by county 132-37), height class by species 138---43), height class by county (44-494 tree class by county (50--55), and basal area class by county (56-GI), Table 62 gives sampling errors for individual counties. Major resource attributes are shown in append& 4, fiwres P through 8.

The inelusive dates for the east Oklahoma survey were June I992 to December 1992. A total of 820 tam- berland sample plots on a 3-mile square grid were visited by field crews &ring this period, At each for- ested sample plot, all trees r 5.0 inches in. diameter at breast height id,b,h. i were dallied with a 37-5 basal area factor (BM) prism on. 10 satellite points distribaatd over an area s f appsoximateBy 4. acre. Trees L 1.0 but < 5,0 inches in d,b,h, were tallied on three 0.0836-acre plots i 7,I-food radius eircu%ar plot), %end;y-three variables were assessed on each tree > 5.0 inches in d.b,h, The variables most important to the assessment of biomass estimates were total tree height and stem d.b,h. Diam- eters were measured with metal tape and total heights with a clinometer,

"Weights were derived for each inventory sample tree by appbgii~g re~ess ion equations and coefficients devel- oped by the USDA Forest Service" Southeastern For- est Experiment Station headquartered at Asheville, North Carolina (Clark and others 1985, %986a, 19861-3; Clark and Saucier 1990; Ciaark and Sehroeder 1986; Saucier and Clark 19853.

The f011owlng equations were used: for trees 2 1.0 inch and < 5.0 inches in d.b.h.

for softwood trees 25.0 inches and ~9.0 inehes in d.b.h. and hardmod trees 25.0 inches and < 11.0 inches in d.h,h.

Y = a p l ~ 2 ~ ~ ) b

hr softwood trees 29.0 inches in d,b,h. and hardwood trees 2 11.0 inches in d.b,&,

Y = a " l ~ " ) ' i ~ ~ f where:

Y = fresh or ovendry weight i based upon coefficients used 1

D - tree d.b,h. "FH = total height sf tree

a ', a"', b, e = repession eoeffieients.

James I": Itosson, Jr., is a research forester, Forest Inventory and Analysrs, U.S. Department of A@iculture, Forest Service. Southern Forest Experiment Stdion, Starkvilte, M S 39'759.

Page 6: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Species-specific coefiicients were used to estimate fresh and dry wenghts sf trees 21-0 inch in d.b.h, When species-specific coefficients were not available for a par- ticular species, general coefficients for softwoods, soft hardwoods (specific gravity ~0.50)~ and hard hard- woods ( specific gravity > 69.564 i were substituted, It has been demonstrated that these genera8 coefficients derived from gouped species produce reliable est i - mates for regional sur'iPeys iFredman 1984).

Wood and bark weights were cornpu"i; for two corn- ponerats of each tree: (11 the total tree above a 1-foot stump to the uppermost twig tips and (21 the main stem (above a 1-$"sot stump $0 a stem terminus of 4 inches in diameter outside the bark), A third tree com- ponent, crown weight, was derived by subtracting stem weight from total tree weight, No merchantability standard of quality was applied to individual trees; all stem estimates were made to a 4-inch top,

and 15 1 a statistical error was associated with the bio- mass equations, None of these errors were accounted for in the tables,

Sampling error is the errcr associated ;;wrath natural and expected deviation o f the sample from the popula- tion mean, Thus, the deviation was susceptible to a mathematical evaluation ~f the probability of error. Sampling errors in tabhe 62 were based on one standard deviation, That is, the chances are two out of three that if the results of a 100-percent census were known, the sample results would be within the limits indicated,

Estimates smaller than State totals will have resub- tang larger sampling errors, The smaller the area examined, the larger the sampling error, In addition, as area or biomass totals are stratified by forest type, species, diameter class, ownership, or other subunits, the sampling error increases and i s greatest for the smallest divisions. The computed sampling error takes the area estimate error into account. The following formula was used to derive the sampling error fir this report :

Three types of error were associatd with these esti- mates: (1) estimating error* (2) application error, and (3) sampling error, The standard of accuracy of the statistics in these tables was governed by temporal and ec~nomic constraints, In large regional surveys, it i s imperative dhaz the factors of time and budget be main- tained at optimum levels,

Estimating error involves three basic areas: i 1) biased error, caused by instruments not properly cali- brated, (2) compensating error, caused by instruments of moderate preci~ion, and (3) accidental error, caused by human error in measuring and compiling. All of these errors were heid to a minimum by a system that incorporates training, check plots, and an edit (consis- tency) ckawk. Field personnel undergo training for 3 to 4 months under the guidance sf field-experiencd per- sonnel. Field work was checked by supert+sors, Editing checks in the office sereend out logical and data entry errors on all plots. It is notpossible to measure estimat- ing error statistieally, but the S ~ertherxe Forest Experi- ment Station Forest Inventory and Analysis (SO-FU) unit holds i t to a minimum by adequate training, expe- rienced supervision, and emphasis on careful work,

Application error comes from applying biomass estimator equations to deterministic measurements made on inventory sample trees. There were five princi- pal errors: i 1; some species may have had no equations developed; therefore, coefficients for other "similar" species were substituted, (2) the size range o f biomass sample trees may not cover the fu41 range of sizes emcountel-ed in a large-scale inventory* (131 the geo- graphic range of the iniyentory may be outside that of the biomass sample trees, (41 trees used in developing biomass coefficients were from fully stacked stands; ink-entory plots ranged from nonsdoeked to overstocked,

where:

SP - sampling error

A = area of timberland

S$ ::= variance of weighted mean biomass estimate

- Yu = weighted mean of biomass

estimate

23: -:- variance o f timberland area estimate,

The error of the area estimate coartributd very little to the sampling error at the State 1eveI (=0.1 percent) but could be s.abs&andial at sub-State levels of computa- tion.

Biomass resource information i s reported by indi- vidual east OkJahoma counties, thereby dlovting com- putation of statistical confidence hs any combination of counties, Sampling error may be estimated by tising the foll~wing formula:

YX, where :

SE =: standard error o f estimate iexpressd as a percentage)

AX' = variable of interest (area or volume;

g = group of counties to be combined 1". =. total. for the unit.

Page 7: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

For example, statistics for dry weight sf hardwood stems in Aeska, Coal, and Pittsburg counties are derived as f011ows:

Dry weight hardwood biomass i s 19X7, 893, and 28-4 miilion tons for total tree, stem, and crwtvra compo- nents, respectively Fifty-two percent of hardwood bio- mass is on 26 percent o f the timberland (appendix 3, fig. 31,

The 95-percent confidence interval is:

The sampling error for hardwood stem dry weight for the three counties is 8-2 percent The 95-percent confidence interval i s 16,130,1 to 22,307-9 million dry pounds, This means that this i~terval covers the true biomass dry of hardwood stems for these three counties unless a 1 in 20 chacce of a random event has occurred.

RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS

There are 4,9 million acres of timberland In east OLJahoma according to the 1993 survey- The neanin- dustrid private forest {NIPFl owners hold 67 percefit 133 million acres; o f the total, forest industry holds 21 percent 11,8 million acres), with the remaining 82 per- cent i0,6 million acres 1 in the public domain,

Most o f the State's timberland i s in the oak-hickory forest t3ye, 2-6 million acres, There are 1-1 and 0-7 million acres, respm%i~~eBy~ in the loblolly-shortleaf and oak-pine types, Bottomland hardwoods make up only 0-5 million acres in east Oklahoma,

Softwood Biomass

The 1993 survey shows there are 73.2 million fresh tons of ssRwood biomass in east Oklahoma, Most of this i s in the stem component, 612 =illion tons, whereas 82,0 million tons are in the crown component (fig, I), Dry weight biomass for soRwoods is 36.2 mil- lion tons --- 30-9 million tons in the stem component and 5-4 rnilhon tons in the crown component, Forty-sk percent of east OBahoma timberland holds only 13 percent 088 total softwood biomass (appendix 4, fig. 2)-

Hwdwood Biomass

A total of 203-0 million fresh tons o f hardwood bio- =ass is on east 0Mahoma"s timberland, Most of this, 151.5 million tons, is in the stem component; 51-2 mil- lion tons is in the crown component (appendix 4, fig, %).

Nonindnskria% private owners have 181-9 milkion fresh dons of biomass r 103.3 million dry tons) iappen- dk b:$ fig, 41, This is 66 percent sf the total forest resource, Porest industry hs%ds 54-1 million fresh tons (28-7 miilion dry tons), The remaining 40-2 rnillioc fresh tons is in the public domain.

Forest m e

The oak-hickory forest has 136.1 million fresh tons of biomass (78.5 million dry tons^, fo%llaawd by 69.2 million fresh tons in the Iob%olly--shsart8eaf pine (35-7 million dry tons), These two forest types collec- tively account hr 74 percent of all fresh weight bio- mass (appendix 4) f ig 51, The remaining 26 percent of fresh biomass i s in the oak-pine and bottomland hard- %mods types,

Diameter Class

A major portion of the State" biomass is in trees 23.0 and .=h 15-0 inches in d.b, h, Trees in this diameter range account for 201-7 million fresh tons 11122 million dry tons) or 73 percent of the total biomass resource (appendix 4, fig. 61,

Wee Class

There are 1582 million fresh tons (85.6 million dry tons] o f biomass in gowing-stock trees 5.0 inches in d,b,h, (appendix 4, fig 71- Rough and rotten trees account for 66,8 million fresh tsns r39-1 million dry tons) o f biomass. SaPvable dead trees account for only 1-0 million fresh ions, less than one-half o f 1 percent sf the total biomass re2 wlurce,

Species

The predominanttree species in east Oklahoma i s shortleaf pine, with 50-5 million fresh tons (243 mil- lion dry tons) of biomass, Post oak ranked second in dominance with 492 million fresh tons 130,4 rniliiora dry tons) foB%@iwed. by black oak with 20,9 miiBBion fresh tsns 112-0 million d r ~ tons) and Poblolly pine with 20.2 million fresh tons (182 million dry tons). Together9 these four species account for 5% percent of the State's fresh weight biomass.

Page 8: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

LITEMTURE CITED

Clark, ,Mexander, III; Phillips, Douglas 8.; Frederick, Douglas J, 1985. Weight, volume, and physical prop- erties o f major hardwood species in the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plains, Res, Pap, SE-250, Asheville, NC: G,S, Department sf Apicu%ture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment S~ation, 66 p,

Clark, -$$exander- 111: Phillips, Douglas R,: Frederick, Douglas J, 1986a- Weight, volume, and physical properties o f major hardwood species in the Pid- ment, Res. Pap, SE-255. Asheviible, NG: U,S. Depart- ment of L4giculture, Forest Service, Southeaskern Forest Experiment Statiori, 98 p.

Clark, _Mexander9 11I1, Saueieq Joseph R, 1990. Tables for estimating total-tree weights, stem weights, and a,~lumes of planted and natural southern pines in the Southeast, Georgia Forest Res. Pap, '19, Macon, GA: Research Division, Georgia Forestry Commis- sion, 23 p,

Clark, Alexander, 111; Saucier, Joseph R., IvfcNab, W* Henry* 491986b- Total-tree weight, stem weight, and volume tables for hardwood species in the Soatheast, Georgia Forest Res Pap, 60, "iP4acon, GA: Research Division, Georgia Forestry Commission, 45 p.

Clark, Aiexander, BII; Schrseder, James G. 1986- Weight, volume, a ~ d physical properties of major hardwood species in the southern Appalachian hlountain~~ Res, Pap. SE-253- Ashexville, KC: U S , Departmentosf Agriculture, Forest Service- Sarath- eastern Forest Experiment Staticn, 63 p,

Freedman, B. 1983. The relationship between the above ground dry weight and diameter for a wide size range o f erect land plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 662: 2,348-2,394,

Saucier, Joseph R.; Clark, ,Alexander, 11%- 1985 Tables for estimating total tree and product weight and volume of major southern tree species and species goups, Washiazgkon, DC: Southwide Energy Gsm- mittee, American Pulpwood Association, 59 p.

Page 9: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 10: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

A P P ~ 1. - Definitions of Terms

Forest Land Classes

Foresf land- Land at least 10.7 percent stocked by forest trees of any size or formerly ha~ving such tree cover and not currently developed for nonforest uses. &Iinimum area c~nsidered for classificatiofi i s 1 acre. The Forest Service in~~entory defines three t~ypes sf fore~"%and: reserved forest land, timberland, and woad- land, all defined below,

blese~-red forest land --- Productive public forest land withdrawn fro= timber utilaization through statutes err administrative regulations,

Timberland-Forest land that is producing, or is capable sf producing9 crops of industrial wood and nci" withdrawn from timber utilization, Timberland is syn- onymous with "commercial forest land'' 'la prior reports, Woodland --- Forest land incapable of yielding crops sf

industrial wood because of adverse site conditions.

Tree Classes

Commercial species -- n e e species currently or pro- spectively suitable for industrial wood ~roducks. Excluded are nrsncrsmmercia1 species, See species list,

Cull trees - Rough or rotten trees, Crou*ing-stock trees - l iving trees o f commercial

species, %eel; must have one 12-foot or two 8-foot logs, cairremiy or potentiallyy to be classified as growing stock. The li:ig{s"i must meet dimension and mrchan- tability standards to qualifyY Trees must also haveR currently or potentially (if too small to qualify), one- third o f the gross board-foot volume in sound wood.

Hardwoods ---- Dicotyledonous trees, usually broad leaved and deciduous.

Lieico trees - - d l trees that are alive. Included are all size classes 1>1,0 inch in d.b,h,), all tree classes, and both ccsmmercia% and noncommercid species,

%BiToncon7mercial sApecies - Tree species of typically small size, POOP" form, or inferior quality that n m m d y do not: devebp into trees suitable for indush-rid wood products. See species list.

NonsaL&;dLe dead trees ---- Standing or downed dead trees that were formerly growing stock or cull and are nod considered merchantable at the time of the survey, (Do not meet soundness, tree class, or size require- ments under sdvable dead tree definition,:

Rotten trees-Live trees sf csmmercid species that are unmerchantable for sawlogs, currently or poten- t i d y 9 because of rot deduction in the sawhog portion. See po.aving-stock trees,

Rough trees --- Live trees of commercial species that are unmerchantable for sawlogs, currently or psten- tia88;v, because of roughness or poor form in the sawhg

portion, Also includes dl live trees of noncommercial species. See growing-stock trees.

Srzludle dead trees - Standing or downed dead trees that were formerly growing stock and are considered merchantable. One-third sf the board-foot ~vgir%urne must be sound in softwoods 29.0 inches in d,b,h,, and one-half o f the board-faoh volume sound in hardwroods 2 11.0 inches in d,b,h,: one-half of the cubic-foot volume must be sound in softwoods <9=0 inches in d.b.h. and sound in hardwoods <11,0 inches in d,b,h. Mi salvabl8e dead trees must be 2 5.0 inches in $,b.h, to qualify.

Ssfiwcdods - Coniferous trees, usually evergreen, having needies or scalelike leaves

Forest rType Groups

Elm-ash-cottonwood ---- Forests in which elms, ashes, or crst$rsnwood, singly or in combination, comprises a piuralgty of the stocking. Common associates include wiklsw9 sycamore, beech, and maples,

Loblolly-shortleaf pine-Forests in which pines (except longleaf or slash pines! or eastern redcedar, singly or in combination coaprlses a plurality o f the stocking. Common associates include oaks, hickories, and gums,

d!e>nt3ped ---- Timberland currently unoccupied by any l ive trees or seedlings: very recent clearcut areas.

Oak--gum-cypress - Bottomland forests in which tupelo, blackgum, sweetgum, oaks, or cuypress, singly or in combination? comprises a plurality of the stocking, except where pines comprise 25 to 49 percent1 in which

d ~ m m o ~ case the stand would be classified oak-pine, C associates include cottonwood, wiilo'iv9 ashes, elms, hackberries, and maples.

Oak-hickory-Forests in which upland oaks or hickories, singly or in combination, comprise a p1u- rdi ty o f the stocking, except where pines comprise 25 to 49 percent, in which ease the stand would be chssi- fied oak-pine. C6;:mmon associates include yellow- poplar, elms, maples, and black wdnut.

Oak-pine --- Forests in which hard\voods (usually upland oaks) comprise a plurality of the stocking but in which pines comprise 25 r;o 49 percent o f the stocking. Common associates include gums, hickories, and yellrs\v-poplar

Biomass

Crosarn weight-Weight of wood and bark in upper branches, Grown ~veight equals total tree weight minus stem weight*

Dry weight-Mass of tree component when oven- dried to a constant weight at 215 'P,

Page 11: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Fresh =eight---Mass of tree component ad time of cutting.

Stem weight --Weig)r.d sf ~vorad and bark in central stem from a 1-food stump to 8 &inch top, No merchan- tability standards are used do define the terminus of the stern; all trees 2 5.8 inches in d,b.h. are comafiwred to a 4-inch top, trees ~5.0 inches in d.llP,h. are csmfiwrd from a 1-foot stump to the central stem twig t ip .

7"otal free ueight-iYeigKt of wood and bark from a I-foot stump to twig tips. Leaves, flowers, Eruids, and roots are not included,

Forest industry lands - lands awned by companies or individuals operating wood-using plants (either pri- mary or secondary b.

Publ te lands (include the following): National forest Lands - Federal lands that have been legally desimated as national forests or pur- chase units and other Iands under the administra- tion of t h e USDA Forest Service, including experimental areas. Other Federal lands - Federal lands other than national forests. .

State, county> and municipal lands - Lands owned Bay States, counties, and local public agencies or munici- palities, or lands leased to these governmental units for 58 years or more.

iVonindastria1 private lands; NIPF (include the fol- lowing) :

F a r m e ~ o ~ n e d lands - Lands operated as a unit of 10 acres or more from which the sale of agri- cultural products totals $1,000 or more annu&%y ~%~oni~adustria k private lands icsrporate) -- Lands privately s m e d by corporations other than forest; industries and incorporated farn~s. AronindusdriaE pritlate lands iindivtduaki- Lands

privately owned by individuals other than forest industries, farmers, or miscellaneous private cor- porations,

MiscelHaneous Definitions

Basal area-The area in square feed 06 the cross section at breast height of' a single tree (or summation of all the trees) in a stand, usually expressed in square feet per acre.

Diameter at breast height id. b. h.) - Tree diameter in inches, outside bark, usualily measured ad 4l:2 feet above pound.

i!J&ura% pine - Pine trees on timberland that show no evidence of artificial regeneration.

~Vatural stands --- Stands with no evidence of artifi- cial regeraeration, including stands established by seed tree regeneration methods.

Pines - Tree species 06 the genus Pinus. Plantations - Stands regenerated by planting or

seeding. Planted pines - Pine trees en. timberland that show

evidence of planting or artificial seeding.

Page 12: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Appendix 2. - Species List Species list* of trees 21.0 I'ncZz in d.b.h. occurring in the F;IA sample, east Oklahoma, 1993

Genus Specific epithet Common name

Gymnosperms

Amelanehier Bet u Ecv Bumelia

nigra spp* caroliniana7 SPP quat ica c~rdlformis glcsbra IJlinoenszs myristicifir-mls ova ta

canadensis florida spp. ' ctirginiarta americart n perznsyluart ica aqu u f ica triaccarzthos diotcus

Eastern redeedar Shortleaf pine Eoblolity pine Balde~yress

Florida maple Boxelder Red mapie Silver maple Sugar maple Serviceberry Ri-r;er birch Bumella Blue beech, American hornbeam Hickories Wdter hickory Bitternut hickory P i w u t hickory Pecan Nutmeg hickory Shagbark hickory Black hickory &lockernut hickory Chinkapin Sugarberry Hackberry Eastern redhud Flowering d o p o o d Hawthorn Common persimn~on White ash Green ash 'liriraterloeust Honeyf ocust Kentucky coffeetree American holly Black wafnut S w e e t e m Osage-orange C binaberry FVhite mulberry Red mulberry B l a c k ~ ~ m , Mack tupelo Ironwood, eastern bophornbeam Vtiater-elm American sycamore Eastern cottonwood

Page 13: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Specks list* of trees 21.0 inch in d.h.h. occurriag in the F f A snnzpic, east Oklahoma, 1993 - Gorztirzued

Genus Specific epithet Common name

Quereus $- Q' Q* Q - Q. Q * & * 8 Q- Q. & * &. &. &. & * Q. Pkobirzia Saltx Sassafras TilEo UInzus e;: u. L": ti: LT. Vaceinium

alba falcc'nta faIcata var, pagodlfolta ineupza7 1yrata macrocarpa marilandkca michauxli muehlenbergii nr'gra nu ftallii palustris phellos rubra shunzardii stellata uelutina pseudomucia nzgra albidum heterop/zyllge alata amerlccmna erassifolta pumila rubra serotina arboreurn

Black cherry Plums, cherries (except black cherry) iVhite oak Southern red oak Cherrybark oak Bluejack oak Overcup oak Bue oak Blackjack oak Swamp chestnut oak Chinkapin oak Water oak Nuttall oak Pin oak Willow oak Northern red oak Shurnard oak Post oak Black oak Black Locust Black willow Sassafras White basswood iVinged elm American elm Cedar elm Siberian elm Slippery elm Septcm her elm Tree sparkleberry

*Nomenclature after: Little, E.L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). A ~ i e . Handb. 541, Washin@on, DC: U.S. Department of Apiculture. 375 p.

f Noncommercial species. zN"t'oncommercral species and only recorded as mortality.

Page 14: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

List of Tables

Tablie 1. ---Area of ttmberland $v eoun@ and er~rtersizlp class. east Oklahoma. 2993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Table 2. ..Area of timberland by county and forest type group. east Oklahoma. 6993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Pzble 3 . --Area of timberiand by county and stand-size class. east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Table 4 .--Area hsftzmbep-land by county and basal area class. east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Table 5 .... Biomass of xosd and bark of litye trees on timberland county and species group.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * I 5 Table 6. -Biomass of zood and bark of sterns in lice trees on tim bedand county and species group.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Table 7. ..--Biomass of uood and bark r?fcrou*ns in live trees on timberland by county and .s pectes group.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Table 8 .... kVood and bark fresh might of lice trees on timberland by county and ownership class.

east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Table 9 . Wood und bark fresh t~lelght of sterns in liue trees on timberland by county and ownership class.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Table 10. -. Wbod and bark fresh weight sf crowns in lice trees on tinzberland by county and sznership tfnss.

east Oklahoma. 6993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Table I l . -Wood and bark dry weight of live trees on timberland by county and ownership class.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Table 12 . - Ubod and bark dry weight of stems in live trees on ttmbedand by county and ownership class.

East Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Table 13 . ..Wood and bark dry weight of crowns in l i~le trees on timberland b&y county and ounership class.

east Okkaho~~a . 6993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Table 14. - k%od and bark fresh weight of lire trees on timberland by county and forest type group.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Table 15 . -Wood and bark f r s h weight of sterns in lisle trees on timberland by county and forest type gmup.

elast Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Table 16 . - Wood and bark fresh weight of cmwns in Live trees on timbedanrd by county and forest type group.

eastbBKlah~ma~ 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -22 Table 17 . -Wood and bark dry weight of live trees on timberland by county and firest type group.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Table 18 . - FVood and bark dry xeight of stems in licle trees on timberland by county and fop-est type group.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table 19 . -Wood and bark dry weight of crowns in live trees on tinbedand by county and forest type group.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table 20 . - kVosd and bark fresh ueight of live trees on timberland by forest t w e gmup attd ownership class.

e a t Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Table 21 . - CVoord ~ r t d bark f e s h migh t of stems in Iitv trees on timberland by forest type gmup and

o~nersrhlip class. eas; Ohlahon~a. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -24 Table 22 .... Wood and bark ~ P " ~ S I E =eight of crowns in I I L ~ trees or, din~beriand by forest type group and

ownershk class. earst Oklahoma. f 993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 %ble 23 ..-. Ctbsd and bark dry werght of lice trees on t i r ~ bedand by foresc type group and rs~nership class.

east OkBahoma. 6993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Tizble 24 . - &%"ood and bark dry weight of stems rn Irce trees on timberland by forest type group and

o ~ c n e r s h i ~ ~ class. east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Table 25. ... \Food and bark dry ~cetght of erouSns in lsele trees on timberland by forest type group and

oxnershep elass. east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Table 26. ... @bod and bark fresh wezght of trees on timberland by species and diameter class.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -26 Table 27 ... Uhod and bark fresh ueigkt of stems tr, Ict'e trees on tzmberland by species and dlarneter eiass.

easdOK,'ahl.i,.pza. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * * 2 8 Table 28. -Wood and bar;? Fesh he:ght of croxns tiz itce i i.. ~ e s on tunbedand by species and diameter class.

east Oklahoma. 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Page 15: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 29, - kVood and bark dry weight of live trees on timberland by species and diameter class, east Oklahoma, 1993 ..................................................................*.*.3 2

Table 30.- bYood and bark dry ureighs" of stems in live trees on timbedand by species and diameter class, east Oklahoma, 99983 . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a 34

Table 31. --Wood and bark dry ueight of crowns in live trees on timberland by species and diameter class, east Bklahorna, 1993 ................,...............,........*........................***.36

Table 32, --- Kood and bark f re she igh t of live trees on timberland by county and diameter class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - , 38

Table 33, --Wood and bark fresh xeight of stems in lice trees on timberland by county and dinmeter class, east Oklahoma, 6993 . . . . = . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a a 38

Table 39,- k%ud and bark fresh weight O ~ C ~ O U ~ P E S in live trees on timbedand by county and diameter class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

Table 35.-Wood and bark dry weight of Ziue trees on timberland by county and diameter class, east Oklahon'~:a, 6993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . 39

Table 36, -- kYood and bark dry weight of stems in !ice trees on timberland by county and diameter class, east O ~ ~ Q ~ C P ~ P ~ Q , 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

Table 37,- Wood and bark dry @eight o f c r o ~ k ' n ~ in live trees on timberland by count"ynpZd diameter class, eastOklahsti.na, 1993 . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *-*40

Table 38.- Wood and bark fresh weight of liue trees on timberland by species and height class, east OkLahsma, $993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . - 4 1

Table 39. - Wood and bark fresh weight of stems in live trees on timberland by species and height class, east Oklahoma, 2993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . * 43

Table 40, --.- Wood and bark fresh weight of crowns in live trees ore, timberland by species and height class, east Oklahoma, 2993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

Table 4 1. --- Wood and bark dry weight of Live trees on timberland by species and height class, east Oklahoma, 2993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a - - 47

Table 92.- Ebod and bark dry wigh t of stems in live trees on dinrbea-land by species and height class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a * - - 49

~ a b k 43,- IVooi27 m d bark dry weight of crowns in live trees on timberland by species and height class> east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - * . . 51

Tablo 44. -- Mbsd and bark fresh ueight of live frees on dimbedand by county and height class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 53

Table 45. --- Wood and bark fresh weight of stems in live trees on timberland by county and height class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = - 54

%$Pie 46.-- Wood and bark fresh weight of crowns En, live trees on timberland by county and height class9 east Oklahoma, 3993 .......................................,..........................aa.o,55

Table 47. --Wood and bark dry weight of live trees on timbedand by county and height class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . - 56

Table 48. - FVood and bark dry weight of sterns in live trees on timberland by county arid height eYass, east- Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - a . 57

Table 49* --- Wood and bark dry loeight of crowns in live trees on timberland by county and height class, east Oklahoma, 1993 ..................................................................-.*-58

Table 54). - Wood and bark fresh weight of frees on tianberiand by? county and tree class: east Oklahoma, 6993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . * - 59

Table 51,- Wbod and bark fresh &eight of sterns in trees on timberland by counk:y a d tree elass, east Oklahoma, 2993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . - - 60

Table 52, --Wood and bark fresh weight of eroxns in trees on timbedand by county and tree class. east Oklahoma, $993 ..................................................................=--*61

Table 53.- Wood and bark dry weight of trees on timberland by county and tree c:!ass, east OK%ahomm, 2993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - 62

Table 54, -- Wood and bark dry weight of sfems in trees on timberland by county and tree classj east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . 63

Table 55. Wood and bark dry weight of cmi~:ns in trees on ibirnbedand county and tree class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - . 64

Table 56,- Wood and bark fresh weight of live trees on timbednnd by county and basal area class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - 65

Page 16: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 57, - Wood and bark fresh weight of stems in live trees tin timberland by ekaunisy and basal area class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

Table 58, -Wood and bark fresh weight of cmwns in ltue trees on timberland by county and basal area class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

Table 59.- Wood and bark dry weight of ltue trees on timberland by eoun9 and basal area class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

Table 60. --Wood and hark dry weight of stems in lice trees on timberland by county and basal awa class, east Oklahoma, 2993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

Table 61. ---Wood and bark dry weight o f c e r t ~ i n in 1iue frees on timberland by county and basal area class, east Oklahoma, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

Table 62. --- Sampting errors for estimates of wood and bark ueight of ltue trees by county9 tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . component, and species group9 east Oklahoma, 1993 7 1.

Page 17: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 1 .-Area affhhrfarad by cstuny ?i catd~wrship class, east O ~ h m 1993%

Ownershirr class - County A11 classes National Ernest Olher public Forest induswy Nonindustrial vivare

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " ~ ~ u ~ & a c r ~ ~ - " - " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~

Adair Atoka Bryan Cherokee Chwtaw C a f DeIawirre M;askeil Latimer Le Flax McCumn Mclntmh M a yes Muskogee Ottawa Pitksbwg mshmalaha Sequoyh

All counties 4,895.5 222.7 359-5 1,047.3 3,266.1

* Nunlbers in columns and rows may not total due to rounding.

Table 2.-Area o f 1 h k r M by csfanry adforest vpe group, east O k m

Forest tyl~e: group

All Lobloll y-shcrrleaf Bdtomlmd County classes pine Oakpine Oak-hickmy h;nrdwclsds7 ~ s n t ~ d ~ - -

A d i r A t o b Bryan Cherokee Choc&w coal &!aware I-lakell Latimer Le Flcrire M e u r t a i n Mclntwh Mayes M w kogee Othwa Pittsburg r2ushmaa Sequoy&

* ~ u m k r s in cslurresis and rows may rad total due to rounding. '~ncludm mk-gum-ckpress and elm-ash-cotronwd types. '~imberland with 0.0 stocking in trees.

Page 18: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 3,---Area o f l m b e r h d by cutin9 cad smd-seze class, eat O k t i a h m 1 ~ 3 ~

Sltand-siw class

AIl Sapling- County classes ~onstiscked'l seedling Poletimber Sawtimks

Ada~r Atoka Bryan Cherokee Choctaw Coal Delaware hl"ake91 Latimer Le F l a e M c C m d n McPntwh M a y a Muskogee Brcawa Pittsbwg Poshmataha Sequoyah

All counties

I

Numbers in ccrZun.ans and rows may not ldal due to rounding. t ~ i r n k s i a n d less thm 135.7 percent stocked.

Table 4.-Ara q f b h k r h d b y county and basal arm bfims, emt OkkiaQnus, 1 ~ 3 ~

Adair A t o h Bryan Cherokee Choctaw Cod Delaware Hake11 Latimer Le Flax McCrsmin McBnbmh Mayes Mwkogee o ~ b ~ d g i

Pltabung b h m a a Squoyah

B S ~ I area class* ~Sqwre~eieIi"acre~

0

Numbers ler cdumns and POW s may not J o b 1 due to rounding. 'Based upon all Irve trees 21.0 nnch rn d b,k.

Page 19: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

c m m b h

g !2 % ~ m c d

Page 20: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 21: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 22: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 8,--Uild a d barkfresh werpht ofbzve trees on :rzni>e~b~d b"p counrg and awnershrg class, ease Clikhhsm 7993- --- Ownership class

All classes Satlonab forest mher pbiac Forest 1nd~1~t1-y Nonlndusir~al prvate *

Cccunt) softc E E ~ SQA' I I U ~ ~ogt' ~ a r d " SO~I* ~larc!" soft* ~iad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mallronpaud- - - - - - - - - - - -

Adarr 1,166 4 13,hZ;S 9 0 0 0 0 130 7 6 9 4 53 6 Atoka 5.837 0 25,02k 8 13 C; 00 1,9404 1,8271 0 0 Brqan 21 1 9 16,807 I 0 0 0 0 00 9060 C; 0 Cherokee 'i ,635 9 30-5 1 1 5 6 0 0 0 00 5,0476 Gi 0 Choctaw 3,987 5 i 5,965 4 0 0 O i l 1942 18724 0 0 Coal 22 3 6,765 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i) a3 Deiav+xe 7304 21,331 9 0 0 0 0 51 0 2,318-1 3 0 I-iaskeil 2,333 4 15,764 5 0 0 00 00 3,1170 1,0916 Latamer 11,5400 18,5223 0 0 014 1.8169 1,027 3 i) 0 Le Flwe 28,574 4 50,733 8 45.032 1 10,063.5 0 0 2,945.3 6,383 2 hlcCu&u srn 37,294 2 50,493 3 5,823 6 4,414.9 1,664 1 3,493 0 34,069 4 McIatc6h 142 7 13,135 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,758.0 0 0 Mayes 631 8 15,835 5 0 0 O C 6918 1,6364 6 0 Mus kogee 66 9 12,843 6 0 0 0 0 31 2 4,4fX 8 0 0 Cttavl a G O 5,850 7 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pirrsburg 3,167 2 1 6 0 0 00 1134 7085 0 0 Pushmaraha 39,041 7 13,413 1 0 0 06 997 2 2,063 2 20,938 Sequoyah 878 Z 19,856 3 0 0 0.0 28 8 1,625 3 0 0

Ail counties 146,321 7 305,"4t fi 220,S25 7 16,478 4 7,535 O 35,522i3.6 62,483 0

* ~ u n i b z r s In columns and rows n-ny not total due to roundhng. ? ~ o f t w d \pc*es - h - d w d spcle\

Table SB.---W0ai a16ki hqrkfresh ~ * s r g & q f s t e ~ m rn 1n.e trees on 1 1 ~ n l w r M by county and o ~ n e r s h ~ v c k m , emt O k h h o m 6 ~ 3 * - -- -- Ownership class

AIH classes ---

Piatrsnal forest (Dekrr pobllc Forest ~nduslay Xonindus~nril private

Chuntr %oftf ~ h r c i $ soft+ I Q Z ~ soft+ H X ~ $ SOA* I I ;ap.cii soft' I I X ~

Adarr 991 2 23,1377 0 0 0 0 00 563 2 0 0 0 i) 991 2 22 574 5 Aroka 4 948 5 18.473 2 0 0 00 1,5388 1 3 9 4 1 G 0 00 3,3W 7 17,074 1 Brjan 1 7 1 3 12,97d4 0 0 0 0 0 3 6716 0 0 0 1) 1713. 11,9028 Cherokee 1 409 4 22,991 4 0 0 0 0 00 3,671.8 0 0 0 0 1,104 4 19,319 6 Chmtata 2,4724 11.6616 0 0 00 1686 1,35446 0 0 0 0 2,503 8 16,466 9 Coal 167 4,9615 0 r ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 167 1,9645 klaware 611 1 15,835 0 0 0 0 if 46 3 1,726 7 0 0 14 0 56% 9 14,108 4 61;aske61 1,956 6 11,8109 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,385 5 903 5 I,C)73 7 1,053 B 8,35: 4 Latlnner 9,816 I. 11,719 3 0 0 ci0 1,5438 7500 0 0 0 9 8,302 3 32,969 2 Le Fimc 23,9546 37,6441 12,9050 7,4044 8 0 2,123 0 5,079 7 5,292 9 5,980 0 22,823 8 McCurtarn 38,708 5 '3 5,192 7 3,887 2 3 585 7 1,124 1 2,615 0 27,527 % 18,007 9 4 , T O 1 12,886 0 Vclntach 930 110583 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3290 0 0 0 0 93 0 8,729 3 M a y a 593 6 11,887 3 0 0 0 0 593 6 1,207 B 0 0 0 0 OC? 106802 Musliogee 590 9,6192 0 0 0 0 26 8 3,368 5 0 0 C) 0 32 2 6,550 7 Ottawa 00 4 4 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 6: 0 0 00 446-2 P~tbbild-g 27188 6,8161 0 0 00 1034 49d7 0 0 00 2 6 % 1 G 8,3214 1"errhmataha 327716 12ISq3 6 0 0 0 E ~ B I 1 5 4 5 5 1 7 2 3 5 3 102521 r.i.6802 2 0 3 x 8 7 C;c.qril,\al-n -58 8 14 817 2

-- - --- - 0 0 --

0 0 2". 5221.38 - --

14 0 3 0 7353 1351174 -p - - - - - - -

, 2 1 6 count ic~ 132,291 3 293 052 "3- 792 2 12 088 2 6 422 1 26 460 0 50 845 5 ~ 6 2 6 6 47,231 2 229,878 I - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - -

Page 23: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 10 --Wctod d barkfresh ~ e t g h f ofrrrow7~5: pa lcve trees on tmberhnd 63. county mui ownersknrp class, east OkWmmz, b ~ 3 * -- Ow nershsp class

" - - " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mlllt@n p o u d - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - a - - -

Adair 176'3 7,7612 O 0 0 0 00 1972 0 0 0 6 Atoks SS8 5 6,555 6 0 ": 00 301 7 433 0 0 0 0 0 Bryan 406 4,232 7 0 63 0 0 00 224 4 0 0 0 0 Cherokee 226 5 7,520 1 6p 0 0 0 1) 0 1.375 8 0 G 0 0 Chcctaw 415 I %,SO69 0 0 is 0 256 4778 0 8 0 0 G a l 56 1,8012 6 0 0 i? 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 O Deka.icare 119 3 5,4% 9 0 C I) 0 78 5914 0 0 C 0 HaskeII 378 1 3,953 6 0 0 0 0 00 4'31.5 168 2 466 3 Larimer 1,693 9 4,803 G 0 il 0 0 273 1 277 3 0-0 0 0 Lr Flwe 4,5164 13,1347 2,0974 2,6591 0 0 822 4 1,363.6 1,690 6 McCumo 8,58& 7 12,303 7 936 3 1,731 1 243.0 ti83.9 6,442 4 5,193 4 Mc1ntea.h 49 4 3,377 2 0 0 0 0 08 42969 0-0 0 0 Mayes 951 3,9182 0 0 0 0 9 6 1 4292 0.0 0 0 3fus~o:oger P O 3,2244 0 0 0 0 44 1,0406 0 0 6 6 Ottawa 00 1,3865 0 6) 0 ia 6; 0 0-0 0 0 0 0 Psetsbwg 4-48 4 3,oz-a 5 o o o o 12 5 2133 o o 0 e i""ushrnauha 6,270 f h 4,257 2 0 @ 00 111 9 51% 8 3,703 4 3,5lti 7 Sequcyah 1192 5,0391 0 0 0 0 5 3 4056 0 0 0 0 --

All countses 24,030 3 1C%,928 8 3 033 5 4,390 2 1,112 5 9,Wi,6 $ 1 637 5 I ll%9 0 -- 8(

Nilmbers rn coIumws and rows m y not totd due 10 rounding P ~ o f t ~ d SpccIeC ' l l a r d w d r-gpecles

Table I l .---Wood and bark dc+ wwirsghr oj+ltve trees on sot:berM &p)l counry and omershp r/m*rl east O k h l -- Ownership class

ArBa~r Atoka Bryan Cherokee Choctaw cm1 Delaware Haskc11 Latr me9 ke Flwe B%e@umun Mcln tah Mayes Mliskogee Ottawa P 6 l ~ b ~ ~ g Pushmaraha Scquo>&

ABI countaes 72 367 9 225,296 ":%O,Zl% 2 "43% 1 4,706.7 26,504 5 31,194 0 26,145 5 27,353.9 179,247 6

Num"eers 1x1 columns cknd rows may not total due to rsuadang S o f a w d species

' ~ a d " $ r ~ x d species

Page 24: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 1 2.--bs.rd a d bark dry weight qfsterns ln live Crees m tmd"erkzk/f by COLIIIQ d o~~ltership ciass, east Obclahor~ua, 1923

Ownership class

Alil classes National lbsest W e r pbIic Forest iadiisay Nontndustrtal pivae

County soft" ~ a r d ; soft4 H~J-0' ~ s f t ' ad' softi ~ ; i r d ' soft* HardS

Aclair Atoka Bryan Cherokee Choctaw e ~ r klaware Hake11 Latimer Le Flae M c G u h n Mclntosh Mayes Muskogee (b(l;iwa Rteburg hshmatzlha Sequoy&

All countics $1,719.6 178,6W.4 8,849.6 7 , . 3,20";t.9 15,421.8 25,937.8 20,472.9 23,727.4 135,613.6

I~urnbers in colurnras and rows may n d total due to rounding. ' t r o f t w d species. '~iardwtw~a species,

Table 1 3 , - W d and bark dry weight ofcroww in live trees .s t h b e r k d by COUPIQ a d omershbp clam, emf OkIclbr

Ownership class

Adair Aloka Bryan Ckrokee ChwCaw Coat k l a w z e Hake11 Latimer Le Floae M c C u h n McIntmk Ma yes Muskgee Ottawa Pittsbwg Pushmataha Sequoyah

All classes National tlorest M e r public Forest iradusey

softt ~ a r d " softt ~daafd* softt ad' softt ~ ~ 2 ~ i d - d ~

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ l ~ j ~ ~ p ~ ~ & - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ - ~ -

74.6 4,368.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 102.3 0.0 0.0 393.7 3,68 1.0 0.0 0.0 133.3 235.9 0.0 0.0

17.8 2,462.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 142.7 0.0 0.8 101.6 4,278.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 828.5 0.0 0.0 185.5 2,227.5 0.0 0.0 11.8 223-9 0.0 0.0 2.5 B ,097.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

50.8 3,OSaCi.3 0.0 0.0 3.6 344.8 0.0 0.0 866.4 2,195.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 374.9 83-9 203.4 748.6 2,621.6 0.0 0.0 121.9 157.7 0.0 0.0

2,W5.% '7,074.5 823.9 1,365.5 8.0 457.3 592.0 884.8 3,9102 6,424.5 444.8 938.5 110.3 499.2 2.832.2 2,737.0 22-5 1,926*4 0.0 6.0 0-0 275.9 0.0 0.0 44 -0 2,281.8 0.0 0-0 44.0 266.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 9,898.5 0.0 6.0 2.2 58'33 0,O 0.8 6-0 '387-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

195.5 1,634.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 109.2 0.0 0.0 2,47=4.6,% 5,9W.2 0.0 0,O 623 269.1 1,648.4 1,847,5

s i -8 2,"ig.o 0.0 8.0 2.3 209.16 0.0 0.0

*~urnbers in columns and rows may not total due to rounding. 'Softwood species, b t ~ z d w d spciim*

Page 25: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 1 4 . - W d a d barkfresh wag& $jive frees on hzrrzberkd by counlp, &forest ryge group, east Oklab~ua, 1993-

Forest type group

L&lolly-sho~-ele;16 Bcciornf.and& All types pine Oak-pine Oakhicbry haa-rdwds '

ecunry soft' ~ a r d soh* ~"-f;zrd SO& ~ t u d soft$ H X ~ S soft$ W ; U C ~ ~

Adair A t o h Bryan Cherokee Chwtaw Coal Delaware Haskell Latimer Le Fiwe McGldmin Mclntmh Mayes Muskoges. i3:tawa r2itrsblas.g FZlshm~&a Squoya3

All cmntres 146.321.7 405,981.8 1Bit,216.-d 34.108.2 30.667.9 40.6M.2 10.856.3 261,440.8 581.3 69,772.5

41

N u m k r s i n coiurnns and rows may not total due to rmnding. 'lrmciudes mk-gum-cy~ess and elm-;ash-c&tonwd types. ' S ~ A W ~ spdes. ' ~ m d w d species.

Table 15.---.Brood and barkfresh weight 4sPems in I k e trees on t h k r h p t d by counv &forest type group, msi" OkM

Forest type group

Addr Atoka Brym Cherokee Checraw Cod Dzlawae Hake11 Larimer Le Flae M d u m i n McEnrmh Mayes Mmisksgee Ottawa Pirhsbrrrg b h m M a Sqk~oyah

L&iol%y-shorlld B o t t o & a n d 4 All types pine OaLpirae: Oak-hickory h a d w d r ? '

softS ~ a r d ~ oft^ ~ a ~ - d ~ soft* ad^ soft* ~ i l s d ~ soft$ IIW~~

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i i g s l l i o n p o u p h - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

991.2 23,137.7 571.5 318.1 0.0 0.0 4 19.7 22,8 19.6 0.0 0-0 4,948.5 18,473.2 3,793.7 1,022.8 I,M1.6 1,135'3 93.2 8,143.9 0.0 8,171.1 171.3 32,574.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 171.3 9,650.9 0.0 2,923.5

1,409.4 22,991 -4 814.3 175.3 333.1 348.9 262.0 18,175.0 0.0 4,292.2 2,672.1 11,861.5 1,848.3 621.3 385.6 378. l 438.6 8,408.2 0.0 2,153.9

15.7 4,364.5 0.0 0*8 0.0 0.0 16.7 1,539.7 0,0 3,424.8 611.1 65,835.0 0.0 0.0 222.0 304.9 3821-1 15,530.2 0.0 0.0

1,956.6 i t ,8 10.9 495,5 328.9 f ,204.7 1,3092 226.3 5,272.8 30.2 4,899.6 9,846.1 13,719.3 6,149.8 4,911.4 3,162.3 4,025,8 533.8 7,096.8 0.0 684-3

23,964.6 37,644.1 16,911.8 5,449.0 4,634.7 5,708.2 2,4 18.1 20,258.5 0-0 6,228.4 38,708.5 38,192.7 30.554.2 5,941.6 5,652.3 6,017.6 2, Iw.7 18,269.3 1901.3 5,964.1

93-0 10,058.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 65.5 6,236.4 27.5 3,821.8 593.6 11,887.3 593.6 323.2 0.0 a86 0.8 9,643.7 0.0 1,920-4 59.0 9,619.2 0,O 0.0 0.0 0-0 59.0 9,177.8 0-0 44 1,4 0.0 18,464.2 0.0 0.0 0-8 0.0 0.0 4,464.2 0.0 O*O

2,7 18.8 8,8 16.8 1,207.8 530.6 1,047.2 1,931.5 399.4 5.923.1 34.4 2,130.9 32,771.6 32,185-9 23,671.0 8,135.5 7,7!8,6 9,363,3 1,381.9 12,5880.6 0.0 l.,706,5

758.8 14,8119.2 8.0 0.0 559,9 5 12.0 199.0 12,0518,9 0.0 2,209.3

Nurnkrs in so!umr%s and rows may no4 total due to rwlading, '1nclude.s oak-pmcy'%press and e lm-ah-ccs$ tnnw iw-s . ' ~ o f t v d d species, ' H ~ Q W ~ species.

Page 26: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 16 ---bimd c~d bark jksh we~pht ofcmww 117 Jzve trees on ~ ~ ' d m k r k d 6) COUMQ dqdi7re.s~ bpe group, east O k M m d , 199.3~

Fcsrest t y p e group

86.

Yunnkrs in colurnm and rows may not f&l due to r~mnd~ng. 'Includes cak-gum-cypress and e l m - a h - c ~ t c r h t w d hypes, t ~ o f i w d S p C l e S .

' ~ a x d w d spcres.

Table 17.---Wood and bark dry weegk ofleve frees on tonkperhnd by ccruszQ &forest ope group, pact OCPkhhnma, 1-99.3*

Forest iyipit group

L&crloiily-shorriieaf Eatodarad& AD1 types pine Oak-pine Oakhickory h m d w d s

Couhatv SSE+ ~ ; a r d $ oft" H X ~ ~ ~csft: ~ a r d ~ S O ~ Q ~ a r d ~ SO^+ ~arri%~

Adar Atoka. Bryan Cherokee Choctaw Coal Delaware Hmkell Latrrner Le Flwe SfcCumesa, McInioch Ma yes Mwaskcrg& m a * a Pittsburg Pwhmtaha Sq-auoyA

All cmntles 72,467.9 235,296.7 51,658,4 19,794.3 15,145.2 23,727.9 5,358.5 151,420,2 305-7 40,054-6

L

Numbers rn colurnrss and rows may rid tm1 due to rwrrdrng. Includes oak-gum-cypress and elm-sh-ccpztsnwm types,

'SO~IWG"XDB specres. s ~ s i r d w w ~ species.

Page 27: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Table 1 8 . - W d and bark dv waghs ofstem BM dive trees on l ~ r n k r t a d b y countv &forest ope group, east CBkSsaZt

Forest t y p e group

A d a r in rub Bryan Cherokee Choctaw Coal DeLawae Haskell Laarrner Le Flc8i-e McGumrn Melntesh Mayes Muskogee dSltawa Pirrsburg b h n u ~ a Sequov&

Lchlolly-shonld pine

K u m k r s in columns and rows may nob. tdal due to rtxrnding. '~ncludes mk-gunl-cypess and e l m - w h - c a t o n w d types. ' ~ o f i w c r ~ species. ' ~ a r a l w d species.

* Table L 4 - - W d a d bark dry wetgh~ o f c r o w en h e trees on --

--

L&lolly-shonleaf Elatorndand+ All types pine OaLprne Oak hsckory h a r d v l d s

-

County SOA" ~ ; e r d $ ~ c r f t ~ ~ a r d soft2 ~ a r d ~ oft$ ~ i n r d ~ SOZ+ ~iard'

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Adar '74 A 4,368 6 44 8 63 9 0 0 0 0 298 4,304 7 0 0 0 0 A t o h 393.7 3,681.0 288.1 222 2 N O 145 5 9 6 1.546 9 0 8 1,724 3 Bryan 17 8 2,462 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 14 8 1,842 5 0 0 619 6 Cherokee 101 6 4,278 3 55 3 11 4 22 6 67.6 23 5 3,277 6 0 0 921 8 Chcxtaw 185 5 2,227 5 125 3 85 3 25 4 51 2 32 8 1,680 5 0 0 110 6 Cod 2 5 1,097 7 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 2 5 122 2 0 0 775 5 &1aware 50 8 3,096 3 0 0 0 0 26 8 57 7 21 0 3,038 6 0 0 (3 0 Haskelf 166 4 2,I85.1 39 8 58 0 104 1 250 3 18 3 927 6 3 2 9 9 3 Latimer 448 6 2,631 6 174 6 342 0 238 2 757 3 35 8 1,354 3 0 0 168 1 Le Flme 2,005 2 7,974 6 1,430 8 823 5 368 9 B ,065 2 205 6 4,0645 3 19 8 I , i 19 5 McCunaln 3,910 2 6,424 5 3,227 6 944 4 457 2 1,002 2 186 ii 3,210 7 29 3 1,267 2 MsEntmlr 22 5 1,926 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 I5 4 1,126 3 7 1 800 i Maycs 44 I? 2,284 8 34 0 69 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 1,553 Q 0 0 361 6 M U K O ~ ~ J 3 1,891; 5 c o 0 0 0 o o o 3 3 1,807 3 o 0 91 2 CH;.ir;ss;l. a 0 0 78'7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 387 2 0 0 0 P~trsburg 195 6 16340 92 Y 40 4 77 0 145 6 23 6 982 6 2 1 465 2 Pushmaahaha 2,473 3 5,903 2 2,1451 8 9,435 I 587 9 1,929 4 101 6 2,322 4 0 0 313 3 Sequoyah 51 8 2,738 0 0 0 1) 0 35 9 85 2 1 9 2,226 6 0 C 426 2

- Ail ccarntres 10,748 3 56,696 2 7,909 0 4.095 4 2,051 1 5,477'1 7 4 5 36,703 2 42 6 10,423 5 -- -

%'umbers i;n columns and rows may no8 total due to rwndlng 'includes mk-gumcypess and elm-mkr-cottonwd types

~sof tw& Spcles ' ~ a r d w d sperres

Page 28: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 29: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 30: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

t ~ W , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ A N ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~ C O ~ I P . ~ S ~ , ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C G ~ C * ~ ~ C ~ C ~ ~ C N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ s c ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~

*cp.** ,-rr-w w - Pi,' %30?2 '? r c g r - - c y i "

.pg - N N e we rn P1- * w t" * &

N

I _q

: c ~ ~ ~ n c o ~ m c e r ~ ~ w ~ m - ~ e ~ 0 ~ ~ " p 6 ; ~ ~ - ~ p : " " ; ~ ~ ' - e " 0 ~ q ~ ~ c ~ = w I ~ B ~ - - G N ~ ~ - O ~ W ~ P ~ ' - " W ~ m b m * 0 P 9 C W X L O - P C " C C X @ 3 S c , r - r ~ - - b b - b * N W V ~ ~ N ? ' - - ~ ~ N G ~ - ~ W ~ N F - - - W P -P - n; 3 4 N--‘ V M M - - - Z P W - - P4 N b G N N X X M

Page 31: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 32: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 33: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 34: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 35: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 36: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

0.0 0'0 0-0 0'0 S ' 9 L 9% 0'0 0'0 0.0 0'0 P ' SZ 61"o 0'0 U'O 0'0 0'0 0'0 1 'S8 0.0 0'0 Z'PC 0% L'94ib 0'0 0-0 0.13 0'0 0'0 0.0 0'0 0'0 0'0 L'CIZ 0 0 0 0 0'0 i 'HZ 1 'ZY 0°C) 0'0

0'0 0.0 0'0 1.69 b'ZW 6'50.2 0'0 0'0 S'LE I 0'0 0- MIZ C'SRZ C)'O 0'0 0'0 0.0 0'0 L'S8 1 O" 11 6*SE2 0'0 0.0 b'ZSS L'LI *'LO l b'C9 0'0 0'0 0'0 0" ISZ 0 0 O'b";: L'98C 0'0 L'bl 1 0 0 0'0 9'Obb Q'TIL S'LI - - * - - - - - -

L'FL S"9 T 0 0 Z.Z tZ L'ZSi b"89 8'0 0'0 +'(HZ 4)"O

k.S IO'! Z'PL'S 6"8E O'L T b'6Z 0'13 0'8 E 9'ZSS E"S6ZL1 Z.8%' 1 b'6LZ S'PI 9'tZS YZZ S'WbOl T'EZ L'Gbd L'II 1 S'OZ 8'OL 0 0 V'OO S L'ZEI Z'SL 1 t 'ZO1 0.0 00 b. 1 L9*9 Z'8S9'L O'ZGZ

- " - " - - - " -

E'% 1 0'0 1 'GZ S"YLb SeEOS 9'LL 8 "L i 0.0 6'1 t 8'bE P'Y$L E'IZ6: C'OtL 6'8 1 6'686 Z'liZ 0.0 Z.081: 8'WS' 1 Z'9ZL'Z 1.5Pl 0'0 O'E9 6-66 8'08 I L'S9 L' f EG. P'kS L' CjUZ

8"bSI 6.67 L ' t t 0'0 6'1.L8 E'H) '( Z'bP 0'0 1 '9l.6'1 5~9SV'* S' Slag - - - " - - - - " .

Z^bT T 0 '0 0 0 0,682 E "69Z O " L 9 S'Cb 0 '0 6'09 L"0Z 6'5 I E 9'8L1 P'8 bi: 0'98 X'OLL Z'E6 6'b L'ZY"I: 1.'XLY 8'S1011 9.z 0 .o $7'9 &'LC L ' S L 8'19 L.WZ L'b91 E'SS 0.0 b'P 'I ' Z d E -Z * ' t6b " ) L 1 2'9 1 0 '0 I 'LOL 9.S0S6 1 5'082 - - - - - - - -

Z"l.89 h.8k I ' C X Z.ZL!4'1 1'1+6'Z L . L M ' ! C'M t.6L 9'69VL1 S'LE I O'kOV'9 0*8CLhE d'Zb6 L'6b 1 8'H36'1 L'9Z I 8'dni)G 1 *S08'9 t'OLL'I. 9'L19" EI b' 1 LO" s 05 *.WgAz (r'6S8 9'68t'I b'Xbt L.ZMI'Z S.69Z P.

b'(lYd b'SZ1'1 Z ' t L B'LZb Z'Z'69' 1 6, L%'1 L'6LI ' I L ' Z L I 8 'Pt l Z'&L"O?. Z'X6S66b L'*LLbZ

(ryYlaq l r n d ~ q +m saq~rrl) s s p ra)arua!a - - --- - - - - - ---- -- - - - -- -- - - - - - -

gf$ l ' m c ~ " ~ q ( ) $ma % q 3 ~ d r a p ~ ) sa8~8ds Lq C ~ A ~ U I U uo sdadg dnt l jo 1~d1tT~~-&~ ?d-tG pa, gmofi---.(,ii: a!*$, r-4 CCJ *

Page 37: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

E 1 c i 2 , C I

4 I "s t ,

Page 38: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

1 0 1 U 0 1) 0 0 0 S'h l z zs 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6' 1?5 I ' ? t l t " L L 0'0 d) 0 0 0 0 0 a.66 Z ' L 6 I 'CbZ S'tls 0 CS Y'SG I 8 OL t isL r'Et 00 0 O 0 0 b'S1 0 0 0 0 S.kZ 1 L S1 rl Z$ 0'0 L'b 1 Z ' I X I leE'tCL 6'9 I

- - - - - -

b (a 00 i: i P t ' Z Z 0 85 d 85 Z'P8 9'08 8 I 'SO1 P ILS Asr,qlnau pax 0 0 00 0 0 0 U 8 81 S*E I 0 0 0 U 0 0 k Z b Luu~aqlnrru arr.lyri (9.0 o 11 0 0 o o o o 00 L) o z az u o z T Z Xu=~errrr(~> M Zd 9 OZ t tS S db 9 ZL '6 9LE 8 T97 $, XLt G 5% i ZZ$'\ aiauv~u-ads?s() I011 Z'17Z I 'kO? X Z I G Z ZQI 6 06Z W 6% Z'h91. X LPZ S IZV? trm8laarng Z b t "319 0 Zhk: 5 IL 0 sr r 6'8 b L.96 t l L 9'19 8 ~ 1 0 ' 1 l n u ~ ~ r n 73~18 6'I; B 0 0 C'L I 0 0 5 L 0 0 00 P 91 0 Ob 0 LS i C l p q ue3uau1~ 0 0 00 0 0 00 S'Lt 0 0 191 I) 0 0 0 i 99 aa~taaljru3 Lyi7nllaax 6 08 1 OL 8 1Q 6'962 1 OI? 0 881 6'69 9 93t 0 9s 8 OLO'I ~ ? ; F I X ~ ~ A ~ U O ~ I 0 L ' I Z 0 1) P"P 0 0 00 I 'RZ 0' Zi: 0 61 L SO1 ~ s n w l ~ a ~ e i i f , R'tOG 1'90d L B Z b 8 E13V 0.618 S'OI19 e: 1a.b b 'L t9 9 O6Z d7 LLS'V qse u a s ~ r j i 901 "r'S6Z L'I LZ Z SSE h.61 k 1 '6Sb: 6.WS L SOZ f 'PY T L W9.Z 311qfi 0 '0 00 0 0 L'L* 9 ' E E Z 8Z L' I01 6'LOL S XZZ 9 ~ L L unruruls~acl u t , m o j 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 'Z I Z 9Z t LT E.LL I ' C t l rrJorplmr?H 0 0 00 0 0 O a 0 0 i OZ 0 96 6'806 I 'ZL9 L L693 p x > . ) ~ % p O u r ~ a ~ o ~ d 0 '0 0 0 0 0 00 9 8 0.0 00 5'61 Y'LX L'4 1 1 pnqpar ural=j I 'LL Z ' tB W IZ 0 0 Z-ZP O'LZ S'9L 0 0 S'b I 957 /$ua~;"qqae~ 9 L S I 1'182 9 WZ 6'8LC L.68 S Z'iOP i OrdZ X L11 L'EEL 9 IL"J""t Lkaaqm8n~ 6 L131 W'KXZ: 5'XZb L' WL T " 106 L.606 8'829 S'LSZ' I 11').Z9 X 80i% A ~ o y ~ r q mu~3yooyil 1 '89'5; 9"L08 X'6S8 9 bb6 tZ9L ' l T x O ~ $ ' I lS'8Lk" lli(0S'Z ?;'+kt3 1 P$($?OI X~oysrq qsvi(l .Ir PS O'bL I'Sk P'6L L'VZ1 9 FOZ t 'Lb i ti;T 9-Z Ci C)(iL ii~oqsrq ysr?q8r?q~ o '0 o r, s EI u o 8.0 L 'T T 00 0 0 CI o z 5~ / i ~ 3 ~ ) ) 3 t q ~ C K U I I I N

i 6SI 6'L6 k (SOZ 0'61Z b % i '96 a LS 0 Bi 8 S 7 ZLfXI 1.1~9ad L b l L'05 L R91 9 TPI O WT Q LT 8.9 6 I6 t '61. 9 9L9 d~oq3rq otlnB~d L ' i b l b'b9 9 6L 9 (Mi 6'ZP 1 0 6L 0.60 1 k ' W 1 9'69 7. ht O* 1 Amy3114 )nzrlal3ra 0 0 1.eZ b OC t ' b? 5 61 L'L T 6'8 t S 09 0 95 i. Lb.t Lwqrrlq "rwm b'Cb S'99 8'1 Z 1 Y ' t I Z 8'65.6 L'E9'Z 0'851 t ' L l b Z 06l -h. ld.91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z'R L'8 0 91 R ZS 5 151 R"3Z

tsatJL'13fH ur.r?aquJuq ur3r aaruv 'tr3w>aqanla O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 5; Li: 2 91 O.CB 67% 1 Ca Oi 5 916: t?rl;~"9r\g I?'*(> i .MU k h l 0 0 9'"SQ) 1 L 0s 1'8% b'zb 1 0 0 9 k tb~! q311(1 asnnx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 I.' LZ 0 6. 5. %C Auaqdnr~~ay L ' t t L GT: L,W 6'22 0 0 Ir SL 6.5 1 6' l C 5. 62 Z XIl a l d m re8nc; Z t L 1 8 s6 6 9d-1 Y It1 L I P 0'66 9'I.S. 0 0 1 '7 tLZ.1 qdvtu J ~ A ~ I S

8 L 9 01: S SU T'ZI 6 LG D Xb U S SI 1.89L O'tSb t ii99'l ald~wr pa3 7 191 0 8Z1 7.16 0 4b L 96 Q DL t.1 i 0 96 Z Q l 8 Z06 ~apjaxot j 0 0 S IZ Z'OZ 0 0 0 0)7 0 0 00 L ob 6 b1 I L C I aldmu ~ p ~ k ) i q Z'b l 0 0 L'8C 0'0 S' lC 00 R'P 0 O 0'0 6 121 \carclliapleg S XbZ 0 b i b h'L69 Z SCL S'XOT? 19SS" Z'Vb(Eiii'k 9 LS87 LL'BXZ: L Ybt"1 2u1d /CIIO)V(IO*I 9 O t X ? 1 Z I T ' t 8'1239% S'95SSL S 81I" L Z58V9 Z 086" LT'Q81'Cr L 5TV'I S XW'Zt arircd p a l i ~ o q ~ 5"61 K LS I 'b6 9'191 6 16.1 L LSZ Z 8bf X 1;50 L'EQZ 5. 9ZO'Z j iqmpal aJagwq

- * - - - - - " - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -s73jUnod ~ O ~ I I ~ W - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - - - -

6 X I 6 91 6 tl (12 1 6 01 6'8 6'9 5 -1. 6 Z cas\rrp aiurr9u rrt,tmno7 r i r 3 d < O'L l -- -

-1) 5 1 -0 LI -0.11 -0 6 -0 L -0 S -0 L -0 I - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- -- -- -- - - -- I! W

(j1(8tfry lsna~;?rq ,m b ra~b~u j ) ss?ep Jal;xur?ra -- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -

"y"Uoqrrjq~ jma ' ss I ' ]~ rs~aurr.)rp sar~ads A q p tnq~ay unr rro s a a airl E J I S & ~ I S IYBI~E;"M Q p Gtq p m p ~ o ~ --' 01, alcllg I -3- * Yc ,

Page 39: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

.sar&s parjulrrrapaan ptrirr y s r ~ r m a r r ~ ~ ~ t ~ < ~ ~ r apnl~rar ssr3s-d~ Jaqr "r, *(iCuaq:) y q q dasxa) saauaqcr sapnim~

?j 'sa1;31~03~31q pparpluapaoil

"Z xrpardjr? 'IIsag sarcrds a ~ s rsslraag dq gr;szr)dqMl~ i i

-%urpumj~ 01 anp lewu;>X ua Leu S ~ O I PUB suwnj("m, DI s ~ q w n l \ j L

00 00 00 0 0 0.0 O 0 P'X 1 00 OO 00 0 0 0 C) S'ZIZ Z'd.6: G BaL 1 99 I'LB k 6L 13 U t O $91 00 0 0 I) 0 6 GZ

E ti: 00 0 0 Z ld 9 99 00 63 0 L CAI1 Z V8i OO O I) 00

0'0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 (3'8s 6'86 L be1 6.8 0 0 0 O o*o 8"6%):$"2 g"8LhkZ 9'1152 S1'91S t.91: Z opt" Z OI L i s z 8~LOI 0 0 69'ZSL S It Z'RP 0'0 o a) t "i S9 1'1 88 0 0 6 Xb LoIa 9-ZS I i e, 0 C9 S'BEZ - - - - - " -

S"b 1 0 0 L"C S'EX O' l i M"tP 8"IbZ t t68 L'I I Z'8P 0"S tT E"61 z"8st3hl Z.OLE'9 b OCJ; Z"61U61 1 L6 1; 65 O U 9 B9L z.1 L S OX 8.8 1q"l a: ca t7"91t 0'0 t EX b'l6t7 t . k k L * l 0 0 0 VP t "Z9 Z ZEB (bx

8 91 0 SL1

" - - " - - " -

0 s.7 P'EGB 8 '01, 0.8' 1 b b"bI B OC9 0 01;L'X 9'6!iSbL L'8 8 $3 t v 8 "bL n Y L r t"m" 141 9'181 %EP Z'I tOUE 6 "6YZ'L t "19 t.7 IE ' I 8'95 8 6 kLL ' i 0-iL9Zb 1 9 L?' 6 d lO'f r^l SXLB O'Stb b. S 6-22 1 8'6VL'S w s n ~ o car L 67s Q kLZ'Z 8 BsqB'I il? o i I'1ZL 6 SS9'l

- - - - - - -

Page 40: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

- I s 8 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ q q q ~ ~ p ' . ~ ~ q ~ 1 ~ g ; ~ a - p . p " . q ~ ~ ~ p c q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

$ = % ; : ~ c r c v r ~ r - x ~ - - m - - ~ ~ ~ w - m - . - r ~ - e e t - - - a ~ m ~ ~ r r n a - ~ r n t g ~ ~ - C r - i ; ~ gm.t?4--..- W Q I C C - - S N % C N C ? ; - - N - f .--4

r - - $ - . - - r - - - ~ , N $ * Q ~ - - - ~4 n w w a e - ? J w e - M rPI gi I -

Page 41: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 42: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

All cimses 1.6-4.9 5.0-9.9 lO.Gl4.9 219.0

Adair Atoh Bryan Cheroke Ghmbw ec~rrl hlawiire Haskell Laimer La: FLore McGurtilin Mclntosh Mayes Mufkqejiee C)ltawa Pitaburg h h 1 1 1 U ; b Sequoy&

umbers in columns and rows may nor iota1 due to munding. '~ofiavd species. ' ~ ~ l r d w d species.

Table 37.--Wo& d bark dry weighr @ c r o w in live trees on thberkar?d by G O U ~ arrld

Dimeter class (Incks at b r m t heigk)

Adair A t o h Bryan Cherokw Chmlaw Coal k l a w a e Hakell Latimer Le more

McIntosh Ma yes Mmkogee a ~ w a Pithburg k h r n h a SequoyA

All counrles 10,748.3 56,BN.Z 552.4 3,316.4 6,438.3 20,426.0 2,530.5 14,316.6 1,227.8 15,037.2

*~urnbers in columns and rows may not total due to rounding. ' S O B ~ W ~ spcrlps. S H = ~ W ~ species.

Page 43: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

~ y q ? q ? ~ q T q q q q y v : Y q y q e : * " : ~ ~ q q Q q f : q c ; ~ " C ! q " 1 ' " : " C ? q q q ~ ~ ~ C ~ Q C ~ O Q N ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C O ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ W O + P - ~ ~ ~ O C + m w m - - n a m w i t - - m - m * q n mP-32 m e W#W8* g r im- u2y

r n - - Leu"

3

Page 44: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 45: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 46: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 47: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 48: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 49: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 50: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

-sa!ads parjtluaprrrn pw pl33iawcx3reou >upnlcru! S I J ~ S B~)c)+*

.(iluaq,l qx lq ~ d a ~ x a ) sa>uaqa saprrl3u1 "";rpoq:rrq pagrauaprui-1

B

"Z x r p a a a "IS!] sa!rrds 33s :sm1~.;38 A q p;~~!13qe@iv 9

- m p WJ-S~> B! pm%ld am "q-qp ui saq3u! > 3nq " q q p rrr qau! 0.17 saaa ( 1 ~ .y"qp a! sarg3~0 0"s 7 SU;?jaa 00 Aijwo pamm;rrra slq8rall 5 I

.durpom.r 03 anp IWI ma 6vu r;Mor pa8 sa~rx~aalcrr, ma s ~ q w n ~ *i

-- -- - (doj9de,.rt 08 dwnls 1mJ1 r;, M A ~ 5 ~ z a ~ u! sm13 1q81dl-l

-- lll ----- - I -- - - - -- ---- -- --- - - lll__lll. - _I - _-^_-- - - --- - - -- __I_ - - p3nutwoj- ~ M I " ~ m y ~ rm 3 ~ 3 0q81ay sl;ilsa& (kl wq~aqw~ uo ~2a~; l r~ ;J~XIJO lq8rr;~~ Lip? q~~;rxa p n p ~ - - . . - - l a i q y *

Page 51: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Z"VE1 S-EB 0-0 L"9LE 0'89 1 ES9$9li O"0 63.0 Y"80C 1-87 6-01 F C GLt L"16 8.L. 6-W 9 8 L'VS 8' tEY 9'&1t73 b.Sb'Z L'VL 0 6) 9 avo 0'6E L~S?Z?i L'SE 9'101: L'Ot G"Lb 9'69 9 0.0 Z'kS 9"S9 a?'W 1 9"S11 EmE I 0'0 S'Z9E'8 I*ZIZi8 L"ZI 9

- - " " - " - - - -

Page 52: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 53: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 54: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

1 Id . r C d F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; c c s ~ ~ o c c - - - - c c o ~ ~ ~ q ~ c c s q ~ r - c o c , ~ ) ~ ~ = " e ~ c ~ o ~ c c c = : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E 6 ~ ~ i = , c ~ r ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ t 3 f = ~ a ~ ~ - - i yc &

e-4

! I j I

I s 1 Ikcn 4 ~ ~ ~ C ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ( = ? q ~ 4 9 C C = C ~ C O ~ ~ F ~ d ~ 6 ~ C ; 0 C C = : C C C 0 3 C I : ~ ~ ~ ~ - . - ~ ~ - C " C " ~ ~ Z : O ~ ~ C ~ W O F ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ C O ~ ~

I I

Mag m - V' P4 w

j i : i i

Page 55: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 56: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 57: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 58: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 59: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 60: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 61: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 62: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 63: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

rrq P-( til N N I

Page 64: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 65: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 66: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 67: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 68: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 69: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 70: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 71: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 72: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 73: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

gable 6% --&mpdrrsg ermrsjor e s t w l a qfw*o& ar& h r k welghi of h e trees by f i o ~ i n ~ ~ free c@?tJ?ona"nb, at& spec8e.s group, east Okhh

Persear samplsnag error of Percent sampling emor d fresh we@[ dry we~ght

Tml tree -- Stem Crown Igwl Wee Stem Crown

~ m n e v softP H S ~ SO^ ~atrcl"~oft' ~ r s s d sofig PIX^' soft' iixd' so&'

Adiarr A t o L Bryan Cherokee Chcxtaw Cod k l a w x e Haskelf Latlmer Le Flae M&u&rn Mcini-h -Mayes s 4 ~ s k ~ ~ Ottawa Pizbbusg h ~ h n r n t a h d squ0y;nk

*see text fa derivation of sampling error. ' S o f t w d species. Z ~ ~ d ~ d s p r e s ,

Page 74: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 75: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

SOWWOODS HARDWOODS

Figure I.--lVood and b a r k , f r p . ~ h , j i v e - h r ~ e biomass for softwoods and BtcarAw-oods, by tree ccmgcnenr, ease Okkahornta, 8993.

a BiCaRrASS

@ AREA

PERCENT OF TOTAL BIOMASS AND TOTAL TIMBERLAND AREA

F;gure 2 -Elfecee\e ~PBISII; ojfrerh, bbl-e-tree softwood ~ ~ O M & L S S and reiatlipe area of ~o f t i +ood tambedand b~ r e ~ p e c t l k ~ jlrekd class, east Okkabacnza, 6993

Page 76: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

HARDWOODS

PERCENT OF TOTAL BlOMASS AND TOTAL TIMBERLAND AREA

Figure 3.--Efleclivc eierlisit;; of fr t~si 'z , I tve-tree Binrdi.,*rroea' hionlass and r~ktztSt.r area o f hiaridrc~>nd timberland b j re.yxacrive ;cie/d class9 $ask" O k k a h ~ n ~ a , IF93,

OWNERSHIP CLASS

Frgure 4.-Wood and bark , fresh* lit-e-tree biomass for ss$wc~ods and ? i a r d ~ t ? ~ B B ~ , b a oa.irrers-,.hzp ckars, east Oklahoma, 1993

Page 77: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

SHORTLEAF PINE HICKORY HWRDWmBS

FOREST TYPE GROUP

Fagure 5,-Wood and bark , fresh, /we- t ree blomass for sof twoods a n d hardwoods , by forest type group, enSd Ok&aiaorna, 1993.

DIAMETER CLASS (%NCHES)

Figure 6,----W-ood and bark , fresh, live-tree biomass for softwoods and hardwoods combined, b y 2 - inch diameter classes, east qdk tahoma. 8883,

Page 78: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

GROWING ROUGH & SWLVABLE NQNSALVABLE SAPLING STOCK ROTTEN DEAD DEAD

TREE CLASS

Figure 7.---Wood and hark, fr~"sh, hive-free biomassforsoflwoods and knrdwcaads, by tree ctass, east Oklahoma, 1993.

BASAL AREA CLASS [SQUARE FEEVACRE)

Figure 8.------Wood and bark, fresh, live-tree biomass far softst~oods and hardwoods. by basal area eitzss, east Lak lahorn a, 6893.

Page 79: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&

Rosson, James F., Jr. 1993. The woody biomass resource of east Oklahoma, 1993, Resour, Bull, SO-184. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agiculhure, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experi- ment Station. 76 p,

%"rabies are present& for "fresh and dry biomass estimates of major trees in east Ouahoma by forest type, ownership, spwies, stand basal area, tree class, diameter, and height. Information. for total tree, stem, and crown components is included.

K e ~ o r d s : Forest inventory* forest land, green weight, large-scale sample, r e ~ o n a l inventory.

The United States Department of Agieulture rLTSDA) prohibits discrimina- tion in i t s progams on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex? religon, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not a"i prohibited bases apply to 41 progams,) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of Communications at (202) 720-5881 (voice) or (202) 720-7808 ITDD).

To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agieulture, U.S. Department sf Apiculture, Washineon, D.C, 20250, or call (202) 720-7321 (mice) or 1202) 720-1127 (TDD), USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer-

*U.S, GOVEkQmNT PRINTING OF~IC~:1934-565-0l6/80045

Page 80: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 81: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&
Page 82: Southern Research · The Woody Biomass &source of East Oklahoma, 1993 James F. Rosson, Jr. Data from the most recent east Oklahoma forest survey of the 18 eastern counties were US&