SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION · The South Dakota Department of Transportation provides...
Transcript of SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION · The South Dakota Department of Transportation provides...
SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(STIP)
2016-2019
PREPARED BY THE SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF PLANNING/ENGINEERING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
The South Dakota Department of Transportation provides services without regard to race, color, gender, religion, national origin, age or disability, according to the provisions contained in SDCL 20-13, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 1994. Any person who has questions concerning this policy or who believes they have been discriminated against should contact the Department’s Civil Rights Office at 605-773-3540. The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation." 165 copies were printed by the Department of Transportation at a cost of $6.78 per document. This book is also available in the form of a PDF file via the internet at WWW.SDDOT.COM. “This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration [and Federal Transit Administration], U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors [or agency] expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U. S. Department of Transportation.
TO THE READER
This four-year Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) was developed through the coordinated efforts of the South Dakota Department of Transportation, South Dakota Transportation Commission, state and federal agencies, local and tribal governments, metropolitan planning organizations, other public agencies, transportation providers, citizens and other interested parties. The program identifies highway and intermodal improvements to preserve, renovate, and enhance South Dakota’s transportation system. This STIP shows how anticipated funding will be used to serve our state’s transportation needs for Federal Fiscal Years 2016 through 2019. This STIP was developed in April based on the funding levels specified in the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century” (MAP 21), which was approved by Congress in June of 2012, and provided funding for FFY 2013-2014. Since then, a number of extensions of MAP 21 have been passed while Congress struggles to develop a new transportation bill. The latest House Bill, H.R 3236, was passed by Congress and extended MAP 21 through October 29, 2015. As a result, federal participation beyond October 29th is unknown and uncertain. We developed this program with the expectation of receiving the same level of funding as provided the previous three years. Once Congress has developed and passed a new highway bill, adjustments to this STIP may be necessary to account for changes in the amount of funds South Dakota is expected to receive. We use this program as a planning guide and not as a binding commitment to deliver the projects exactly as described by the proposed dates. This program is subject to revisions and changes which may be required by unforeseen situations such as funding changes, additional construction cost increases, delays in acquiring right-of-way or complex design and environmental issues which must be resolved. We pledge to do our best to adhere to this program and serve the public interest through these projects. We value your input, advice, and support of our efforts. The Department will continue to work hard to provide a high quality, safe transportation system for the citizens of South Dakota and everyone who travels through our state. Cordially,
Darin P. Bergquist Secretary Department of Transportation
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS ......................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY PLANNING PROCESS ..................................................................... 7 STIP and TIP Approval Process ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 State and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Long Range Planning ..................................................................................... 8 Public Input and Coordination Process ................................................................................................................................................. 8 STIP Amendment Process ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 STIP Prioritization Process ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Discretionary Programs ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Schedule for the Development of the STIP ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Elements Comprising the SD STIP Process ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Elements Comprising the SD MPO TIP Process ................................................................................................................................ 13 Elements Comprising the Long Range Statewide Transportation Plan (LRSTP) ............................................................................... 14 Elements Comprising the SD/BIA TIP Process .................................................................................................................................. 15 HIGHWAYS PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................................................................ 17 Highway Overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Financial Constraint ............................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Estimated Fund Usage in Fiscal Year 2016 by Improvement Type .................................................................................................... 27 Estimated Fund Usage in Fiscal Year 2016 by System ....................................................................................................................... 28 Highway Characteristics by Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................................................. 29 Functional Classification State Highway System Miles and Usage .................................................................................................... 30 The Interstate Highway System in South Dakota ................................................................................................................................ 31 Interstate Surface Age and Surface Type ............................................................................................................................................ 31 State Highway Systems Map Narrative ............................................................................................................................................... 32 State Highway Systems Map ............................................................................................................................................................... 33 2016-2019 Transportation Improvement Program Map Narrative ...................................................................................................... 34 2016-2019 Highway Construction Map .............................................................................................................................................. 35 Highway Abbreviations and Definitions ............................................................................................................................................. 36 Highway Program Key ........................................................................................................................................................................ 37 FHWA Funding Source Key ............................................................................................................................................................... 38
(Continued)
SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY PROJECT LISTING Areawide ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Aurora .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 Beadle .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Bennett ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Bon Homme ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46 Brookings ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 Brown ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Brule ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 55 Buffalo ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Butte ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 59 Campbell ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Charles Mix ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 63 Clark ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 65 Clay .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 67 Codington .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 69 Corson .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Custer ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 74 Davison ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 76 Day ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 78 Deuel ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 80 Dewey .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 82 Douglas ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 83 Edmunds ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84 Fall River ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 86 Faulk ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 87 Grant ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 88 Gregory ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 91 Haakon ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 93 Hamlin ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 94 Hand ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 97 Hanson ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 98 Harding ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 100 Hughes ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 101 Hutchinson ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 102 Hyde ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 104 Jackson ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 106 Jerauld ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 108
(Continued)
Jones ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 109 Kingsbury ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 111 Lake ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 113 Lawrence .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 115 Lincoln ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 118 Lyman ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 121 Marshall ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 124 McCook ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 125 McPherson ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 128 Meade ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 129 Mellette ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 131 Miner .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 132 Minnehaha ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 134 Moody ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 138 Oglala Lakota ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 139 Pennington ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 140 Perkins ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 145 Potter .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 146 Regionwide ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 148 Roberts ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 154 Sanborn ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 157 Spink .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 159 Stanley ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 162 Statewide .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 164 Sully ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 172 Todd ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 173 Tripp ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 174 Turner ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 176 Union ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 178 Walworth ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 180 Yankton ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 181 Ziebach ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 183 INDIAN RESERVATION ROADS PROGRAM PROJECT LISTINGS Cheyenne River ................................................................................................................................................................................. 187 Crow Creek ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 193 Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe ........................................................................................................................................................... 199
(Continued)
Lower Brule ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 205 Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Reservation ........................................................................................................................... 211 Rosebud ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 219 Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate .................................................................................................................................................................. 227 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe ............................................................................................................................................................... 233 Yankton Sioux Tribe ......................................................................................................................................................................... 237 RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM .......................................................................................................................................... 243 Railroad Overview............................................................................................................................................................................. 245 Railroad Projects .............................................................................................................................................................................. 246 Railroad Map ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 247 AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................................. 249 Aeronautics Overview ....................................................................................................................................................................... 251 Airport Classifications ....................................................................................................................................................................... 253 Map of South Dakota Airports .......................................................................................................................................................... 255 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM ........................................................................................................................................... 257 Public Transportation Overview........................................................................................................................................................ 259 Public Transportation Projects .......................................................................................................................................................... 261 MPO Transit Projects ........................................................................................................................................................................ 263 Rapid City .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 265 Sioux Falls ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 267
1
Governor of South Dakota
Department of Transportation
Division Directors
Dennis Daugaard 500 E Capitol Avenue
Pierre, SD 57501-5070
Secretary of Transportation
Darin Bergquist 700 E Broadway Avenue Pierre, SD 57501-2586
Finance & Management Planning / Engineering Operations
Greg Fuller (605) 773-3286
Kellie Beck (605) 773-3284
Joel Jundt (605) 773-5105
2
South Dakota Region - Area Map
Rapid City Region
Pierre Region
Aberdeen Region
Mitchell Region
Aberdeen Region Jeff Senst
Region Engineer PH. (605) 626-2244
Mitchell Region Craig Smith
Region Engineer PH. (605) 995-8129
Pierre Region John Forman
Region Engineer PH. (605) 773-3464
Rapid City Region
Todd Seaman Region Engineer PH. (605) 394-2244
Belle Fourche Area Tammy Williams
PH. 892-2872
Rapid City Area Mike Carlson PH. 394-2248
Custer Area Rich Zacher
PH. 673-4948 Winner Area Doug Sherman PH. 842-0810
Mobridge Area John Villbrandt PH. 845-3844
Pierre Area Dean VanDeWiele
PH. 773-5294
Aberdeen Area Phil Dwight
PH. 626-7885
Huron Area Brad Letcher PH. 353-7140
Mitchell Area Jay Peppel
PH. 995-8120
Sioux Falls Area Travis Dressen PH. 367-5680
Yankton Area Rod Gall
PH. 668-2929
Watertown Area Matt Brey
PH. 882-5166
3
4
SOUTH DAKOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS
Donald L Roby, Chair 57 Sunrise Dr. Watertown, SD 57201
Kyle White PO Box 1400 Rapid City, SD 57709
Kathy Zander 322 N Highland Pierre, SD 57501
Ralph Marquardt PO Box 1040 Yankton, SD 57078
Tim Dougherty P.O. Box 2376 Sioux Falls, SD 57101
Rodney Fouberg PO Box 1496 Aberdeen, SD 57401
Kim Vanneman 31148 269th St Ideal, SD 57541
Larry Thompson 2211 N Minnesota Vantage Place Mitchell, SD 57301
Ronald Rosenboom 20708 Lincoln Court Sturgis, SD 57201
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE RAILROAD BOARD MEMBERS
Todd Yeaton, Chair PO Box 216 Kimball, SD 57345
Sheldon Cotton, Vice Chair 606 South Street Volga, SD 57071
Harlan Quenzer PO Box 398 Mitchell, SD 57301
Gary Doering PO Box 74 Cavour SD, 57324
Jerry Cope 5208 Ridgeview Road Rapid City, SD 57701
Carl G. Anderson PO Box 579 Aberdeen, SD 57402
Jeffery Burket 1950 Mineral Place Spearfish, SD 57783
SOUTH DAKOTA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION MEMBERS
Vernon C. VanDerhule, Chair 510 Chalk Stone Road Yankton, SD 57078
Eric Odenbach, Vice Chair 10840 328th Ave Eureka, SD 57437
Travis Lantis P.O. Box 699 Spearfish, SD 57783
Richard L. Pearson, Chairman 204 Oak Ridge Road Brandon, SD 57005
Arlen Hauge, 106 West Doral Ct. Sioux Falls, SD 57108
Chad Hatch 8109 S Grass Creek Dr. Sioux Falls, SD 57108
Christopher Funk PO Box 231 Madison, SD 57042
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 5
INTRODUCTION
The South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) mission statement is “To efficiently provide a safe and effective public transportation system”. To carry out this mission, this Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) provides a comprehensive overview of the South Dakota transportation system and is intended to inform the South Dakota citizen and business person of the transportation improvements planned in the State. This program also provides an opportunity for citizen and business input into decisions regarding future transportation service in South Dakota. The South Dakota Department of Transportation is responsible for planning, developing and implementing improvement projects on systems throughout the State. The responsibility includes: construction, operation and maintenance of the state highway system; providing assistance to local units of government for transportation improvements; administration of State and Federal assistance to rehabilitate rail lines; development and administration of airport improvement programs; and the development and administration of the public transportation improvement program. The South Dakota Department of Transportation encourages public participation in planning, designing, constructing and operating the State transportation system. In South Dakota, each mode is considered before the most efficient improvement is chosen to address a particular transportation problem. This approach to decision-making promotes more cost effective solutions to transportation problems. The DOT organization is illustrated on preceding pages. The DOT is further organized into four regions as illustrated on the map on the inside of the Title Page. Projects are ranked and implemented in a statewide process.
This STIP was based on funding outlined on “Moving Ahead For Progress in the 21st Century (Map 21) which was signed into law at the end of June, 2012. MAP 21 provided funding through FY 2014. At the time of this writing, a series of extensions have funded MAP 21 through October 29, 2015. It is hoped that a new transportation bill will be approved in the upcoming months. MAP 21 established a new Transportation Alternative Program to consolidate and replace the Transportation Enhancement, Safe Routes to School and Recreational Trails programs. It also established a National Freight Policy and National Freight Network, maintains the Highway Research Program, expands availability of innovate finance mechanism/leverages financing mechanisms, and expands and enhances the ability of the state to use tolling. MAP21 also established performance measures and greater accountability, modernizes the Metropolitan and Statewide Planning Process by moving to a performance based approach, provides further reforms to accelerate project delivery, enhances safety, and maintains and modernized transit programs. Federal funding provides a majority of money for the projects listed within the STIP. This table summarizes federal funding by transportation mode:
Mode 2016 2017 2018 2019 Highways $371.2 $354.6 $341.6 $327.4 Railroads $8.0 $6.5 $0 $0 Public Transportation $9.5 $9.6 $9.8 $9.9
The State and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) coordinate planning and projects. The MPOs are in the Sioux Falls, Rapid City and North Sioux City (a part of the Sioux City
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 6
MPO) metropolitan areas. A detailed report for each of the MPO’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has been prepared which includes both State programmed and MPO programmed projects. The MPO TIPs are separately bound, but are considered a part of this STIP. These reports are available from each respective MPO. In the past years, the STIP contained five years of programmed highway construction projects, five years of highway resurfacing (three years of itemized projects and a fourth and fifth year listing a total budgeted amount), and three years of programmed needs for public transportation. Pavement Preservation projects were programmed for the current year. Future railroad rehabilitation projects (except railroad crossing work) were not included in this report. Projects are programmed by the federal fiscal year that runs from October 1 through September 30 of each year. Starting in 2014, the STIP now contains four years (2016 – 2019) of programmed highway construction, resurfacing, and public transportation projects. Pavement Preservation projects are fully programmed for years one through three, and partially programmed in year four. As before, future railroad rehabilitation projects (except railroad crossing work) were not included in this report. The Department has also created a Developmental STIP which is used to identify and develop future projects in years 5 through 8. This allows the Department to start its surveys, scoping, and designs earlier in the process and advance them as they progress into the Four Year STIP. These are only shown on the Statewide Improvement Map found later in this book or can be viewed on the interactive improvement map found on the Department’s website. A list of members of those commissions and boards responsible for approval of projects in this report are listed on Page 4. This
document received final approval from the SDDOT Transportation Commission on August 27, 2015. Funding for projects are dependent upon the continued federal funding made available through the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Railroad Administration, and Federal Transit Administration. All federally funded projects are administered by the state. If federal funding received from these agencies varies from original estimates, the number of projects included in any one year will be revised accordingly. An up to date on-line version of the projects listed within this report is also available via the internet at: http://www.sddot.com/transportation/highways/planning/stip/Default.aspx Click the “STIP Sorted by County” link, select a county from the drop down box on this page and a report will then be generated that lists the projects for the specified county. The Department hopes the information in this booklet and on our website is helpful in understanding the South Dakota transportation system, its funding and programs. We welcome your comments regarding this information. Please send comments to: David Voeltz Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Coordinator South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, South Dakota 57501-2586 Email: [email protected] Phone Number (605) 773-3590 We also encourage you to visit the remainder of the SDDOT Web Site at: http://www.sddot.com
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 7
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY PLANNING PROCESS
STIP AND TIP APPROVAL PROCESS South Dakota strives to maintain a very open process in developing its Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Meetings continue to be held with many user groups and the public across the state to solicit input into the development of the final STIP. The time frames and steps used in the STIP development are shown in Figure 1 (page 11). The DOT also has appointed input groups that provide intermodal and multimodal advice to the Department. A yearly cycle of data collection, analysis, and planning leads to the final STIP which is jointly approved by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. A diagram of the process is shown in Figure 2 (page 12). A computer ranked highway needs list is the foundation for adding new projects to the STIP. These needs are generated by the Department's Pavement Management System, other management systems, and from input groups. The input groups represent all the modes and various special constituencies across the state. The other modes also have a ranking system to suggest projects. In addition to these fundamental elements, the DOT considers twelve planning elements as potential projects are being proposed. They insure consistency in project selection and are also shown in the illustration.
The twelve considerations and the Intermodal Long Range Plan are used to temper and modify the STIP project list before it is approved by the South Dakota Transportation Commission which is the transportation policy group appointed by the Governor. These planning considerations are also used to refine projects after the STIP is approved. Approval of the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) follows a similar process, except there are eight planning elements to consider instead of twelve. The same management systems are required, but the process has slightly different input from groups that have urban interests. The TIP development process used by the MPOs is shown in Figure 3 (page 13). The MPO’s TIP, although a separate document, is considered to be a part of the STIP. The input groups for the TIP process are also slightly different from the STIP groups. There is a citizen’s advisory committee comprised of locally appointed individuals with an interest in transportation, and a technical advisory committee which is comprised of local and state planning and engineering staff. These two committees provide input to the MPO policy committee, which approves the local TIP and forwards it to SDDOT for inclusion into the STIP. Ultimately, the South Dakota Transportation Commission approves the STIP. Projects in the TIP are developed in cooperation with the SDDOT.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 8
STATE AND MPO LONG RANGE PLANNING
The State and the MPOs developed an Intermodal Long Range Plan in 2010. Unlike the STIP, The State Long Range Plan is not a project oriented document whereas the MPO Plans are project oriented. This development process is shown in Figure 4 (page
14). This document will be updated as needed. Copies may be secured from the Department of Transportation and the respective MPO.
PUBLIC INPUT AND COORDINATION PROCESS
The Four Year STIP is updated annually and is essentially a year long process which includes the collection and analysis of data, the development of a “Tentative” STIP, solicitation of public input, securing the final approval, and the final printing and distribution of the document itself. The MPO TIP and the State STIP are developed separately through their own processes, but are coordinated throughout the process and finally are treated as one document. The “Tentative” STIP was reviewed by the Transportation Commission at its regular June 25th, 2015 meeting. At this meeting, the commission granted approval for the SDDOT staff to distribute the "Tentative" STIP and to receive public input and comments on projects. A Tribal/STIP coordination meeting was held on June 10th, 2015 in Pierre. All the tribal governments plus the BIA were invited. Projects in the “Tentative” STIP were discussed as were proposed local entity projects for the purpose of coordination of projects. This process is shown in Figure 5 (page 15). MPO Coordination meetings were held with Rapid City Officials on May 19th and Sioux Falls Officials on June 4th, 2015. Projects in the Tentative STIP and the respective MPO STIP were discussed for the purposes of coordination of the projects. Informal information meetings presenting the “Tentative” STIP were held with the Planning and Development District Organizations (and their invitees) in Aberdeen on June 24th, Watertown and Sioux Falls
on July 1st, Yankton on July 8th, and Pierre and Rapid City on July 9th. In an effort to reach out and solicit input from local units of government and tribal officials, invitations to attend these meetings were placed in the "County Comment", "South Dakota Municipalities", "Northern Plains Tribal Roads"and the “Native Sun News” publications. Formal public meetings regarding the “Tentative” STIP were held in Aberdeen on July13th, Sioux Falls on July 14th, Pierre on July 15th, and Rapid City on July 16th, 2015. A webinar was also held on July 23rd. Notification of these meetings was quite extensive. The SDDOT advertised the meetings in 136 daily and regional newspapers as one means of notification. Notices were sent to special organizations and people that have expressed interest in the past. Public access channels on local cable television systems were also invited to publicize these meetings. A total of 126 people attended the meetings and 128 watched the webinar. The respective MPO TIPs were also presented at the Sioux Falls and Rapid City meetings. Comments were received either orally at the meetings or in writing following the meeting. These meetings were recorded and the audio files, handouts, and presentations were placed on the Department’s website following the meetings. Those individuals who were unable to attend the public meetings or webinar were able to download those files and listen to the meetings and view the presentations on line at their convenience.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 9
Some of the main issues/comments received as a result of the public meetings included:
1. Yankton Bypass – Expressed the need for the construction of a truck bypass for SD50 traffic. Safety would be enhanced by moving the heavy truck traffic, including oil tankers and grain trucks, out of town. Noise would be reduced to land owners along SD50. It will not hurt the retail business in town since these truckers typically do not frequent them. The sharp turns at the SD50/US81 intersections are dangerous and could be greatly reduced.
2. US85 (Belle Fourche) Corridor Improvements – Would like to see the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of US85/SD34. A recent traffic study indicates that this will soon meet standards for having a signal installed. Would also like to have a study done to evaluate the speed limit from Wood Road (south of Belle Fourche) to the city limits. Would also like a signal and cross walks installed at the intersection of US85 and Grant St in Belle Fourche. A parking lot will be developed on the west side of the road and most of the businesses are located east of the road and this signal/cross walk will promote safe passage
3. Safe Routes To School Funding – Requested that all TAP Funding be used for the construction of bicycling, walking and Safe Routes to School projects and not diverted to other uses.
Would like to see additional state investment in this program and ensure low income communities receive their fair share.
4. Traffic/Safety on US81 North of Yankton – Concerned that
slow moving traffic and the numerous hilly portions of US81 cause impatient drivers to make unsafe passing movements. Noted there is a quarter mile segment of US81 north of Yankton where the 4 lane segment ends and again begins near Poverty Valley. It should be four lane all the way through. The correction curve at the Yankton/Hutchinson County line is also unexpected and dangerous. US81 should be 4 lane all the way from Yankton to I-90, or at the very least, to Freeman.
5. Thanks for all the Good Work On the System – There have
been numerous good projects in the area including projects in Campbell Counties and Highmore. The Department should be thanked for all the good roads and work in the area and the process used to select quality contractors.
6. Shoulder Strength – Asked about the design for shoulders on the highways. Are they designed to be as strong as the roadway? Many oversized farm vehicles travel the shoulders and they should be built to the same strength as the roadway.
Some changes made to the “Tentative” STIP that are reflected in the “Final” STIP are:
1. Added numerous railroad crossing improvement projects to 2016 and 2017.
2. Deferred numerous Safe Routes to School projects from 2015
to 2016 due to project delays.
3. Changed a 2018 Shoulder Widening and Spot Grading project on US18 from east of Vetal to the Bennett/Todd County line to a Grading and Interim Surfacing project.
4. Changed a Shoulder Widening project to Grading and Interim Surfacing project on SD52 from SD37 to SD50.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 10
STIP AMENDMENT PROCESS
The STIP is a four-year program of projects that is updated annually and approved by the Transportation Commission each year in August. The Department views this document as a planning guide that best represents the transportation needs and funding assumptions at the time of STIP approval. This report is sorted by county and fiscal year. Projects that occur in multi counties will be listed in each county’s listing but the dollar amount reflects the total project cost. It must be realized that conditions such as changes in state and federal funding, changes in construction cost, re-evaluation of priorities, and changing economic conditions can and do occur during the year. The Department has established an internal STIP amendment process that is responsive to these changing conditions. This process enables the Department to adjust project scope and scheduling to meet changing priorities, to add or move projects because additional funds have been identified, or to add or advance projects that have received special funds (such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009) during the
planning year. Proposed amendments are reviewed internally by the staff and recommendations presented to the Transportation Commission for their information and/or consideration. The STIP is a four-year plan which corresponds with the FHWA approval process. Their view is that any of the projects in the second through fourth year may be advanced for Federal Funds and commitment without requiring an amendment to the STIP. The SDDOT requires an internal STIP amendment when projects are: (1) added to the STIP; (2) deleted from the STIP; (3) advanced or deferred in the STIP; (4) moved between funding categories, (5) there is a change in the termini of the project or (6) significant change in the cost of projects. The FHWA also states that the SDDOT can unilaterally use any of the various FHWA funding program sources without necessitating a STIP amendment.
STIP PRIORITIZATION PROCESS
The SDDOT uses a combination of tools to prioritize projects programmed within the STIP. Some of the tools are a pavement management system, bridge management system, a safety module and a prioritization matrix.
The SDDOT Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) emphasizes preservation and safety as its top goals. To link the Long Range Transportation Plan with the STIP process, SDDOT developed a
project prioritization matrix tool which ranks projects using the pavement and bridge management systems, functional classification, preferential truck network, congestion, and safety. The SDDOT also uses sound engineering judgement, public input, local knowledge and fiscal responsibility to make informed recommendations for improvements to the roadway network in South Dakota.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 11
Figure 1
Hold Adhoc meetings with MPOs, Tribes, Federal Agencies, Local Governments, Others
Receive Transportation Enhancement Projects List
Review Funding with Commission
Receive Public Transportation Program Project List
Receive Aeronautics and Railroads Projects List
Prepare Statewide Ranked Project List
Obtain Approval of Transportation Commission for Tentative STIP
Add Commission Revisions to Tentative STIP
Submit Tentative STIP to FHWA and FTA
Review Tentative STIP w/ Regions, Local and Tribal Govts., Public and Private Agencies
Hold Public Meetings
Summarize Public Comments for Commission Review
Public Comment Period Closed
Develop Final Recommendations for Commission Action
Commission Review and Approve Final STIP
Prepare Final STIP Report
Print STIP
Distribute STIP
Schedule for the Development of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
DECOCT JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPNOV
Review State Highway System for System Utilization
Rank Needs, Provide VMT and Backlog Data
Update Project Costs and Revenue Estimates
Central Office Review of Interstate Needs
Staff Field Review of Resurfacing Needs
Regional Construction and Resurfacing Inspections
Management Field Review of Current and Future Needs
Outline Recommended Highway Projects
Receive Recommended Urban, Safety, MPO, and Federal Projects Lists
Statewide Interstate Inspection
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 12
Figure 2
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 13
Figure 3
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 14
Figure 4
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 15
Figure 5
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 16
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 17
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 18
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 19
HIGHWAY OVERVIEW The Transportation Improvement Project List for highways is delineated in the following section for Fiscal Years 2016 through 2019. The South Dakota Transportation Commission approved this list of projects after reviewing public comments received concerning the "Tentative" program that was presented at public meetings around the state. The needed projects for the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program were developed using a computer prioritizing process and on-site inspections. The prioritizing process evaluates the needs of each highway segment relative to all other needs on the state highway system. The primary factors that drive the process system are surface condition, rideability, pavement type, treatment costs, current traffic, (including the number of heavy trucks), treatment benefits, and available funding. The projects in this document reflect the needs apparent at this time for which funding is available. These projects may have to be adjusted throughout the year to accommodate unforeseen needs, which become apparent through community involvement, special transportation studies or emergencies that may occur. The development of this program is based upon an estimate of available state revenues, local matching funds and anticipated federal funds for a total of $440.422 million programmed for FY2016.
The Fiscal Year shown is when the project is anticipated to be let to contract, not necessarily the year of construction. The time of construction is subject to when the project is let to contract and funding limitations. The estimated costs are based on the 2014 average unit costs adjusted for anticipated inflation. For this STIP, a 2 percent inflation rate per year was used. No Federal Funds are expended on the purchase of right of way, utility relocation or preliminary engineering unless it is specifically noted in the project. For projects where those costs are not federally funded, the preliminary engineering, utility relocation and/or right of way costs will be included in the “Total Cost (Mil $)” column of the report, but will not be included in the “Federal Funds” column. When Federal Funds are expected to be used for preliminary engineering, utility relocation and/or right of way costs, it will be specifically noted in the project description. Since the anticipated amount of these funds will be listed by fiscal year, it is possible that larger projects will appear in multiple years in the STIP as these projects progress through the various stages of construction. Also included in this section on highways are maps, charts and funding explanations to assist the reader in acquiring a better knowledge of the proposed highway construction projects and their financing.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 20
Financial Plan for the 2016-2019 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
Introduction The South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT, we, us) has developed this financial plan to depict the method used to estimate the federal and state funds that will be available to finance the 2016-2019 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The funding estimates are based on the best information available on August 24, 2015. The estimates were the basis of the 2016-2019 STIP that was approved by the South Dakota Transportation Commission (Commission) on August 27, 2015. The funding estimates are a snapshot in time. The actual funding will be different from these estimates. 2016-2019 STIP Funding Estimates Attached are the tables used to estimate the federal and state funds. Table 1 shows the estimated federal apportionment funds allocated to SDDOT for 2016. Estimates are based on FFY 2015 Apportionment. MAP-21 was extended by Congress to October 31, 2015, therefore the numbers in this table will be the same for each year with no adjustment for inflation. Table 2 shows the federal funds and state and local match required for the FFY 2016 STIP.
Table 3 shows the projected State Highway Fund revenues and obligations. Table 4 shows the estimated state revenue by source that will be available for the state match for federal funds and for 100% state funded items such as maintenance. Matching Federal funds is the top priority for SDDOT. The bar chart graphically compares the estimated available funding to the programmed amounts. Advance Construction On October 1, 2015 we anticipate that approximately $25 million in advanced construction (FFY 2016 federal funds) will have been used. We anticipate using the approximately $40 million of advance construction in FFY 2017 Federal funds for FFY 2016 projects in the STIP. The amount of advance construction anticipated to be used each year is shown in Table 5.
Inflation State projects in the STIP for the years 2016-19 are inflated at 2% annually. Local Urban System, County Secondary, and Local Bridge Replacement projects are also inflated at 2%.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 21
Table 1
2015 Apportionment - Actuals As of 8/20/15 Rail Hazard Elimination 1,160,910 Rail Protective Devices 1,160,910 HSIP 15,127,821 Section 164 Penalty Transferred from DPS 4,502,758 Rec Trails 1,125,821 TIFIA 4,606,668 Redistribution of Certain Authorized Funds 891,154 NHPP 149,147,286 CMAQ 11,768,395 STP - Under 200k pop 18,998,813 STP - Local Bridge 1,959,066 STP - Flex 32,475,983 STP - Under 5k pop 17,327,716 TAP 5k 998,893 TAP Under 200k 1,095,226 TAP Flex 2,094,119 NHPP Exempt 4,350,162 Total 2015 Apportionment (Formula + Exempt) 268,791,701 State and Local Match 59,203,053 Total 2015 Apportionment with State and Local Match 327,994,754
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 22
Table 2 Programmed Funding by State Categories FFY 2016-19
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 23
Table 3
South Dakota Department of Transportation ESTIMATED STATE HIGHWAY FUND REVENUES (Millions of Dollars)
STATE REVENUES FFY 2016 FFY 2017 FFY 2018 FFY 2019
Motor Fuel Excise Tax $ 169.415 $ 171.109 $ 172.820 $ 174.548
Vehicle Excise Tax $ 113.432 $ 114.566 $ 115.712 $ 116.869
Non-Operating Revenue $ 8.785 $ 8.873 $ 8.962 $ 9.051
Miscellaneous Revenues $ 16.266 $ 16.429 $ 16.593 $ 16.759
TOTALS $ 307.898 $ 310.977 $ 314.087 $ 317.228
% Change from previous year 44.78% 1.00% 1.00%
REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS: Chris Ott 03/17/15
REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS MOTOR FUEL: Utilized actual data from 2007 through 2012 then applied Linear Regression for the growth in 2013 through 2017 VEHICLE 3% EXCISE: Utilized actual figures for 2007 through 2011 then applied Linear Regression for the growth in 2013 through 20167 NON OPERATING REVENUE: Transfer from Ethanol Fuel Fund, Excess cash from DRR, section 164 funds, and equipment sales MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES: Includes - Special Highway permits, prorate fees, investment council interest, sales and service, project reimbursement, damage recovery collections, logo sign fees, and other misc. revenues.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 24
Table 4
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 25
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 26
Table 5
2016- 2019 STIP Funding Summary
Federal Fiscal Year
2016 2017 2018 2019
Estimated Federal Funds Apportioned 268.8 268.8 268.8 268.8
Prior Year Advance Construction Federal Funds -25.0 -40.0 -40.0 -40.0
Estimated Federal Funds Available 243.8 228.8 228.8 228.8
Estimated State and Local Funds for match and State/Local funded projects 115.9 114.6 102.2 99.2
State Funds for PE, ROW acquisitions, and Utility relocation 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0
Balance from Previous Year 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net Funds Available 399.7 383.4 371.0 368.0
State and Local Funds Programmed 68.5 68.9 69.4 65.7
Federal Funds Programmed 371.2 354.6 341.6 327.4
Total Funds Programmed 439.7 423.4 411.0 393.2
Difference Between Funds Available and Funds Programmed -40.0 -40.0 -40.0 -25.2
State Funds for Advance Construction 40.0 40.0 40.0 25.2
Balance 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 27
ESTIMATED FUND USAGE IN FISCAL YEAR 2016 BY IMPROVEMENT TYPE
Construction/Reconstruction Highway construction is the complete rebuilding of a highway, bridge, or street on an existing or new location. Highway reconstruction is widening of an existing facility and/or the removal and application of new surface. Bridge replacement is the removal and reconstruction of a structure or replacement with a culvert. The estimated expenditure for these types of improvements for Fiscal Year 2016 is $208,260,000. Resurfacing & Asphalt Surface Treatment Highway resurfacing is the addition of a pavement layer or layers over the existing roadway surface to provide additional structural capacity and improved serviceability. For this purpose, resurfacing is considered an additional pavement layer of 3/4 inch or greater and of sufficient length to not be considered normal maintenance. Asphalt surface treatments are maintenance seals that extend the life of the pavement. The estimated expenditure for these types of improvements for Fiscal Year 2016 is $130,079,000. Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is roadway or structure work including replacement of malfunctioning joints, repair of spalled joints, pavement undersealing, concrete panel replacement, reworking or strengthening of bases or subbases to improve their structural integrity, adding underdrains, erosion control or the restoration or rehabilitation of bridge decks and rest area. It can also include
structure painting and fence replacement. The estimated expenditure for these types of improvements for Fiscal Year 2016 is $32,150,000. Safety Safety projects are designed to improve safety at hazardous locations throughout the highway system. It can also include things such as signs, traffic signals, pavement markings, guard rail installation and other projects such as walking paths and bike trails that enhance safe travel. The estimated expenditure for this type of improvement for Fiscal Year 2016 is 69,933,000.
CONSTRUCTION/RECONSTRUCTION
47.3% $208,260,000
REHABILITATION7.3% $32,150,000
RESURFACING29.5% $130,079,000
SAFETY15.9% $69,933,000
Estimated ExpendituresFund Usage in Fiscal Year 2016 by Improvement Type
TOTAL = $440,422,000
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 28
ESTIMATED FUND USE IN FISCAL YEAR 2016 BY SYSTEM Interstate The Interstate System is a multi-lane controlled access facility. The estimated expenditures for Interstate projects in Fiscal Year 2016 are $118,990,000. Major Arterial Major arterial routes are primarily the principal arterial highways on the Federal-Aid System and/or National Highway System Routes. The estimated expenditures for Major Arterial projects in Fiscal Year 2016 are $123,872,000. Minor Arterial Minor arterial routes are the minor arterial highways on the Federal-Aid System. These routes provide the major connections to the principal arterial highways in South Dakota. The estimated expenditures for Minor Arterial projects in Fiscal Year 2016 are $74,704,000. State Secondary State secondary routes are the collector highways on the Federal-Aid System that are located on the state trunk system. The estimated expenditures for State Secondary projects in Fiscal Year 2016 are $22,964,000. Local Local systems include state and/or federal assistance and economic development funds on county roads, urban roads and other locations. County routes are collector highways on the Federal-Aid System.
Project selection for this system is determined by local officials. Urban projects are on the designated Federal-Aid Urban System (cities with a population of 5,000 or more) and are determined by that urban area. Transportation enhancement projects are identified and submitted by any unit of government and are submitted after publication of the document. The estimated expenditures for Local projects in Fiscal Year 2016 are $99,892,000.
MAJOR ARTERIAL28.1% $123,872,000
INTERSTATE27.0% $118,990,000
MINOR ARTERIAL17.0% $74,704,000
STATE SECONDARY5.2% $22,964,000
Estimated ExpendituresFund Usage in Fiscal Year 2016 by System Type
TOTAL = $440,422,000
LOCAL22.7% $99,892,000
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 29
2014 HIGHWAY CHARACTERISTICS BY JURISDICTION
The importance of the state highway system is illustrated in the following statistics that compares this system with the local road system in South Dakota. The 7,808 mile State Highway System comprises 9.5 percent of the 82,576 total miles in the South Dakota street and highway system, however, it carries 67.3 percent of the daily vehicle miles of travel in the State. County roads by comparison are 42.7 percent of the total statewide mileage, and carry 13.4 percent of the vehicle miles of travel. The Township roads are 37.7 percent of the statewide mileage, but these low volume rural roads carry only 2.6 percent of the vehicle miles of travel. Municipal roads comprise only 5.2 percent of the statewide mileage and carry 15.0 percent of the vehicle miles of travel. The state highway system is the most traveled with an average of 2,176 vehicles per day. Township roads have the least traffic density with an average of only 21 vehicles per day. The municipal roadways and the county roadways have an average of 879 and 96 vehicles per day respectively.
TOWNSHIP37.7% 31,171 Miles
STATE9.5% 7,808 Mile
COUNTY42.7% 35,282 Miles
MUNICIPAL5.2% 4,308 Miles
2014 South Dakota Miles of Highway
TOTAL = 82,576 Miles
OTHER4.9% 4,007 miles
TOWNSHIP2.6% 0.662 Million
STATE67.3% 16.988 Million
COUNTY13.4% 3.389 Million
MUNICIPAL15.0% 3.787 Million
2014 Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT)
TOTAL = 24.256 Million Vehicle Miles of Travel
OTHER1.7% 0.430 Million
0 500 1000 1500 2000
STATE2,176 Vehicles per Day
MUNICIPAL879 Vehicles per Day
2014 Traffic Density
VEHICLES PER DAY
COUNTY96 Vehicles per Day
TOWNSHIP21 Vehicles per Day
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 30
State System80.2% 1.050 Billion VMT
2014 Yearly Truck Vehicle Miles of Travel
TOTAL Commercial VMT = 1.310 Billion Miles
Other Streets and Roads19.8% .260 Billion VMT
Statewide SystemThe state highway system also carries a significant majority of all heavy truck traffic within the state. While the state system only consists of 9.5 percent of the 82,559 total miles in the South Dakota, it carries 80.5 percent of the total heavy truck traffic. Conversely, the remaining 90.5 percent of nonstate system roads only carry 19.5 percent of the total heavy truck traffic in South Dakota.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM MILEAGE
The 7,808 mile state highway system in South Dakota is functionally classified into four categories. The largest category with 38.5 percent of the total miles is the minor arterial highways with 3,005 miles. The Principal arterial routes follow with 38.5 percent or 3,009 miles. The Major Collectors category has 14.2 percent or 1,112 miles. The interstate system consists of 8.7 percent or 679 miles.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION HIGHWAY SYSTEM USAGE
The usage of a highway is expressed in yearly vehicle miles of travel (VMT). The interstate system accounts for only 8.7 percent of the state highway miles, but carries 43.1 percent of the VMT. The principal arterial system accounts for 38.5 percent of the state highway miles and carries 36.5 percent of the VMT. The minor arterial system accounts for 38.5 percent of the state highway miles, but carries only 17.7 percent of the VMT. The state secondary system, which consists of the Major Collectors on the State Highway System, accounts for 14.2 percent of the state highway miles, and carries 2.7 percent of the VMT.
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS
38.5% 3,009 Miles
INTERSTATE8.7% 679 Miles
MINOR ARTERIALS38.5% 3,005 Miles
MAJOR COLLECTORS14.2% 1,112 Miles
2014 Functional Classification
TOTAL = 7,808 Miles
State Highway System Mileage
OTHER PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS36.5% 2.236 Billion VMT
INTERSTATE43.1% 2.646 Billion VMT
MINOR ARERIALS17.7% 1.088 Billion VMT
MAJOR COLLECTORS2.7% 0.168 Billion VMT
2014 Functional Classification
TOTAL = 6.138 Billion Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT)
State Highway System Usage
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 31
THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM IN SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota has 679 miles of Interstate highways that provide motorists with a system enabling them to travel the State from border to border with speed and ease of travel. The Interstate system consists of I-90 from Wyoming on the West to Minnesota on the East (413 miles), I-29 from Iowa on the South to North Dakota on the North (252.5 miles), I-229 in Sioux Falls (11.5 miles) and I-190 in Rapid City (2.0 miles). The Interstate system is important to the state and national economy and is the key component in providing connectivity of our rural areas with
the rest of America and the world. Construction of the Interstate system began in 1955 near Sioux Falls and continued for the next 28 years. The final segment of Interstate was completed in 1983, which was on I-29 in the northeastern part of the state. The original construction cost for this system was $494,000,000. In today's dollars, that would be approximately $3.60 billion. Currently, only 1.1 percent of South Dakota’s 679 mile Interstate system is in need of repair or replacement. Planned projects outlined in the STIP will attempt to maintain this condition level on South Dakota’s Interstate system.
SURFACE AGE OF THE INTERSTATE Although some segments of the Interstate were constructed in the late 1950s, most of the mileage was constructed in the 1960s and 1970s. Since the initial construction, a considerable portion of the surface has been resurfaced or replaced. Of the 679 miles of interstate highway in South Dakota, 75 miles (or 11.2 percent) of the surface was placed prior to 1984 and is 31 years or older. 6 miles (or 0.9 percent) of the surface was placed between 1985 and 1994 and is 21 to 30 years old. 179 miles (or 26.4 percent) was placed between 1995 and 2004 and is between 11 and 20 years old. The largest percentage of the Interstate surface (61.5 percent or 417 miles) is 10 years old or less.
INTERSTATE SURFACE TYPE Surfacing on the Interstate consists of seventy percent of the mileage being Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP) with the remaining thirty percent consists of Asphalt Concrete (AC) surface. This corresponds to 483 miles of PCCP surfacing and 196 miles of AC surfacing.
0 - 10 YEARS(2005 - 2015)
61.5% 417 Miles
Surface Age of the Interstate
31 YEARS OR OLDER(1957 - 1984)
11.20% 75 Miles
21 - 30 YEARS(1985 - 1994)0.9% 6 miles
11 - 20 YEARS(1995- 2004)
26.4% 179 Miles
PORTLAND CEMENTCONCRETE PAVEMENT (PCCP)
71% 483 Miles
Interstate Surface Type
ASPHALT CONCRETE (AC)29% 196 Miles
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 32
STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS MAP The importance or significance of state highways varies due to the type and level of traffic that uses them. Therefore, the state highways have been classified into different categories for funding purposes. While similar to functional classification, these categories are slightly different. They are in descending order of importance: Interstate, Major Arterial, Minor Arterial and State Secondary. Two additional funding categories have been added for segments of the state highway system that pass through communities. State Highway Urban (cities of 5,000 or greater population) and State Highway Municipal (Cities less than 5,000) categories were added to insure that funding is dedicated for these types of projects. All of these categories total seven thousand eight hundred nine miles (7,808). A colored map illustrating these systems is found on the following page. Six hundred seventy-nine (679) miles of Interstate are shown in blue on the systems map. This multi-lane divided controlled access facility is 8.7 percent of the total state highway system mileage. Two thousand eight hundred twenty (2,819) miles of Major Arterial highways are shown in red on the systems map. This system of federal-aid primary highways is 36.1 percent of the total system mileage.
Two thousand eight hundred ninety eight (2,898) miles of Minor Arterial highways are shown in orange on the systems map. This system of federal-aid primary highways serves as the main connectors to the major arterial routes. They account for 37.1 percent of the total system miles in South Dakota. One thousand ninety five (1,095) miles of State Secondary highways are shown in green on the systems map. This system of collectors is 14.0 percent of the total miles on the state highway system in South Dakota. The State Highway System Urban roads are shown in pink on the systems map. These are State Highways that fall within the boundaries of cities with populations greater than 5,000. There is a total of one hundred fifty three (157) miles of urban roads which equals 2.0 percent of the system mileage. Finally, there are one hundred sixty five (160) miles of State Highway System Municipal roads in the state. These are State Highways that fall within the boundaries of cities with less than 5,000 in population. These roads are illustrated in purple and account for 2.1 percent of the total mileage.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 33
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 34
2016-2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MAP The 2016-2019 Transportation Improvement Program Map shows the location of major projects on the state highway system. Railroad Crossing Improvements, County Secondary and Off System Projects, Recreational Trails Program Projects, Local Urban Projects, Local Bridge Replacement Projects, Safe Routes to School Projects, Roadway Safety Improvement Projects, Special Projects, Pavement Preservation, Highway System Management Projects, Ag/Industrial Roads, Transportation Alternatives Projects, and Emergency Repair Projects typically are not shown on this map. Major construction/reconstruction improvements are illustrated by dots on the map. All projects for this category represent an estimated cost of $773,576,000 for improvements and cover an estimated 396 miles for 2016-2019. Major resurfacing improvements are illustrated by solid lines. All projects for this category represent an estimated cost of $382,203,000 of improvements and cover an estimated 1,021 miles. Resurfacing projects are programmed for the four year period but are subject to adjustment. Conditions can change rapidly in the outlying years. Many of the Bridge projects are shown by a triangle symbol. These projects represent work on an estimated 541 structures at a
projected cost of $143,282,000 for 2016-2019. Interstate structure projects are also shown by a triangle symbol. Major Roadway Safety Improvement projects, Accident Prevention and other safety projects are shown by the letter “S”. These projects are designed to improve safety at hazardous locations. This can also include other projects that enhance safety on the highway system such as durable pavement marking, railroad crossing signals, rumble strips, construction of turning lanes, roadway lighting, guard rail and other similar projects. This represents 165 projects at the time of publication at an estimated cost of $103,015,000 for 2016-2019. Additional projects of this type are typically added throughout the year as needs are identified. The remaining projects have been categorized as Other and are not shown on the map. This can include preliminary engineering, inspections, chip seals, crack sealing, culvert repair, railroad crossing rehabilitation, rest area improvements, bike trails, conducting studies, curb ramp updates, joint repair, fence repair, railroad crossing rehabilitation and other related projects. This accounts for 219 projects in the 2016-2019 STIP at a cost of $265,968,000.
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 35
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 36
ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS The Highway Construction Industry, like other industries, has its own definitions and abbreviations. Following are the ones used to describe the type of work in this booklet: Asphalt Concrete Resurfacing (AC Resurf. ) – Placing 1.5 inches or more thickness of Asphalt Concrete surfacing to an existing AC surface, and can
include base repair and leveling. Asphalt Concrete Surfacing (AC Surf.) - All stages of asphalt concrete surfacing until the ultimate design thickness is reached. Typically indicates new
surfacing for construction. Asphalt Surface Treatment (Asph. Surf. Treat.) - Application of asphalt and cover aggregate (includes blotters, seals, etc.). Base Course - The gravel material that is put down prior to application of the AC or PCCP surfacing. Crack and Seat PCCP – Breaking a PCCP surface into medium sized pieces and compacting them in preparation for an AC Overlay. Curb & Gutter - Constructing new curb and gutter. Deck Overlay – The placement of a new driving surface on a structure. Dowel Bar Retrofit - Installing epoxy coated dowel bars into existing PCCP pavement at joints to strengthen them. Epoxy Deck Seal – Application of a sealant material to the driving surface of a bridge to prolong its life. Fence Restoration - Replacement of posts, wire or both. Grading - New construction, includes minor structures less than 20 feet in span. Gravel Surfacing - Gravel placed approximately four inches thick, full roadway width. Interchange Construction/Reconstruction – The construction or reconstruction of an interstate interchange. Milling – Removal of 1.5 inches or more of existing AC Pavement. Usually done prior to AC Resurfacing so the overall roadway width remains the same. Pavement Restoration (Pav. Rest.) - Includes slab jacking, joint & spall repairs or partial removal and replacement of the surfacing course. Portland Cement Concrete Paving (PCCP) – Portland Cement Concrete Paving surfacing or resurfacing . Preliminary Engineering (PE) – The initial work performed to identify the type and extent of work needed on a new project. Roadway Lighting - Provide lighting for street, highways and interchanges. Rubblize PCCP – Breaking a PCCP surface into small pieces in preparation for an AC Overlay. Shoulder Widening - Construction or widening shoulders on existing highway. Sign Refurbishing (Sign Refur.) - Upgrading signing to current standards. Signing and Delineation (Sign. & Del.) - Providing new signs, delineators and pavement markings. Structures (Str.) - Structures 20 feet or over in span. Structure Repair/Rehabilitation – This can include the repair or replacement of the driving surface of a bridge, the application of a rigid concrete overlay
that will replace deteriorated concrete, slow chloride penetration and increase skid resistance on bridge decks, or other related structure maintenance.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 37
HIGHWAY PROGRAM KEY
(1) Aurora County (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Federal Fiscal Total Seq Project Number PC # County Length Route Location of Project Type of Improvement Funds Year Cost (Mil $) (1) The highway projects section that follows is sub-divided by the counties in South Dakota. This example is Aurora County. (2) The Line Number starts with number 1 and continues sequentially throughout the report. (3) The Project Number is a unique number for each project and is used to track a project and costs. (4) PCN is another unique number for each project and stands for Project Control Number. (5) County or Counties in which the project is located. (6) Length is the length of each project in tenths of a mile. (7) The Highway Number is the highway or highways on which the project is located. A blank in this space signifies the project is not on the Federal or State Highway System. (8) Location of Project is a general description of a project's location. (9) Type of improvement is a general description of the work planned for each project. (10) Federal Funds programmed in millions of dollars. (11) Fiscal Year is the Federal Fiscal year in which the project is planned to be let to contract. This begins Oct 1st and continues until Sept 30th of the following year. (12) Total cost of the project is in millions of dollars.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 38
Project Prefix/Funding Table
This table provides a cross reference between SDDOT’s project numbering and FHWA core funding programs. The core funding programs are the National Highway Performance Program (NHPP), Surface Transportation Program (STP), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). The NHPP provides funding to preserve and improve the conditions and performance of the National Highway System (NHS) and for construction of new facilities on the NHS. The STP provides flexible funding that may be used for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, and pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. The HSIP provides funding to achieve a reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal lands. The HSIP requires a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads that focuses on performance. The TAP is a grant program for specific activities that enhance the intermodal transportation system and provide safe alternative transportation options. The project number prefix identifies the proposed category of federal funds. However, there is overlap in the core funding program eligibilities and flexibility in funding options. Therefore, final project funding categories may differ from what is presented in the STIP.
FHWA Funding Project Prefix Federal Funding Source
IM National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
NH National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
P Surface Transportation Program (STP)
PH Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
PP or PS Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
P TAPU or P TAPR Transportation Alternative Projects (TAP)
EM Earmark
South Dakota Transportation Improvement Program
Tentative 2016 - 2019
Report Date 09/10/2015By County
¥¥
Areawide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
1 P 0032(15) 041T Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.476 2016 0.581
2 P 0011(78) 040L Various Locations in the Aberdeen
Area
Culvert RepairAreawide 0.0 0.251 2016 0.306
3 P 0021(150) 041E Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Culvert RepairAreawide 0.0 1.068 2016 1.304
4 P 0011(79) 040Q Various Locations in the Aberdeen
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.493 2017 0.601
5 P 0012(177) 040U Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.260 2017 0.394
6 P 0013(24) 041A Various Locations in the Huron Area Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.927 2017 1.131
7 P 0021(151) 041F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 1.554 2017 1.897
8 P 0022(44) 041K Various Locations in the Sioux Falls
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.539 2017 0.658
9 P 0023(37) 041Q Various Locations in the Yankton
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.190 2017 0.232
10 P 0033(15) 041V Various Locations in the Winner
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.562 2017 0.686
11 P 0031(28) 0423 Various Locations in the Pierre and
Mobridge Area
Culvert LiningAreawide 0.0 1.236 2017 1.509
12 P 0042(52) 042E Various Locations in the Belle
Fourche Area
Bore and Jack PipeAreawide 1.002 2017 1.420
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
39
By County
¥¥
Areawide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
13 P 0011(80) 040T Various Locations in the Aberdeen
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 1.238 2017 1.511
14 P 0013(25) 041C Various Locations in the Huron Area Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.333 2017 0.407
15 P 0022(45) 041L Various Locations in the Sioux Falls
Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.380 2017 0.463
16 P 0033(16) 042A Various Locations in the Winner
Area
Culvert LiningAreawide 0.0 0.385 2017 0.470
17 P 0042(53) 042F Various Locations in the Belle
Fourche Area
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.460 2017 0.697
18 P 0031(29) 042G Various Locations in the Pierre Area Pipe WorkAreawide 0.452 2017 0.551
19 P 0032(20) 049K Various Locations on the Standing
Rock Indian Reservation
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.832 2017 0.832
20 NH-P 0032(21) 049L Various locations on the Cheyenne
River Indian Reservation
Pipe WorkAreawide 0.0 0.569 2017 0.569
21 P 0042(51) 042D Various Locations in the Belle
Fourche Area
Culvert LiningAreawide 1.034 2017 1.262
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
40
By County
¥¥
Aurora
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
22 BRO 8002(01) 00G7 Str. 11.6 S & 2 W of White Lake
Over Platte Creek
Structure & Approach GradingAurora 0.2 0.292 2016 0.365
23 PP 0281(113)71 05JY US281 - East of Plankinton,
386060B, Dakota Southern
Install Railroad Signals & Improve
Crossing Surface
Aurora 0.0 US281 0.270 2016 0.300
24 PS 00SW(34) 057U Dakota Southern crossings from
Mitchell to Vivian
Replace CrossbucksAurora
Brule
Davison
Lyman
0.0 0.054 2016 0.060
25 P TAPR(08) 04UF Plankinton - On the east side of S.
Campbell St. from E. State
St./School drive north to 1st St.
Sidewalk ConstructionAurora 0.2 0.227 2016 0.303
26 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
27 IM 0906(70)263 04DR I90 - Strs, Over Main St & RR, Exit
263 (Chamberlain); Over I90, 2.5 W
of Exit 272 (SD50S), Exit 289
(SD45S), Aurora/Brule County Line,
2.6 W of Exit 296 (White Lake), Exit
310 (US281), 6.0 E of Exit 319 (Mt
Vernon), Exit 332 (SD37S)
Zone PaintingAurora
Brule
Davison
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.864 2018 0.950
28 BRO 8002(11) 03F4 Structure 5E & 4.1N of Plankinton,
on 391 Ave., over a creek SN
02-210-109
Structure & Approach GradingAurora 0.2 0.227 2018 0.284
29 BRO 8002(14) 043K Structure 5E & 2.6N of Plankinton
over a creek (391 Ave.) SN
02-210-124
Structure & Approach GradingAurora 0.2 0.257 2018 0.320
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
41
By County
¥¥
Aurora
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
30 NH 0281(111)48 04WF US281 - Fm the W Jct with SD44 to
S of the Jct with SD42
AC ResurfacingAurora
Douglas
10.7 US281 3.325 2018 4.152
31 NH-P 0021(161) 05L2 Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
McCook
Sanborn
130.3 SD1806
SD25
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
SD44
SD50
US18
US281
US81
3.736 2018 4.560
32 NH 0281( )71 05LM US281 - Fm the JCT of SD258 to
the JCT of 243 St
Micro-SurfacingAurora 10.7 US281 0.984 2018 1.200
33 IM 0907(81)308 04DM I90 - Str, SD258 over I90, Plankinton
Intch
Deck Replacement, Abutments &
Painting
Aurora 0.0 I90E 1.055 2019 1.160
34 P 0258(05)277 05DF SD258 - Str. 0.3 N of Plankinton
Interchange Over Snow Ck
RCBC RehabilitationAurora 0.0 SD258 0.040 2019 0.049
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
42
By County
¥¥
Beadle
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
35 BRO 8003(23) 02T6 Structure 13S & 5.5W of Wolsey
over a creek on 218th St SN
03-055-280
Structure & Approach GradingBeadle 0.2 0.252 2016 0.315
36 P 0037(119)129 0232 SD37 - Fm the north city limits of
Huron to north of Huron
PCC ResurfacingBeadle 3.8 SD37 2.189 2016 2.735
37 NH-P 0013(34) 053E Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealBeadle 12.6 US14
US14E
US14W
0.538 2016 0.656
38 PH 6187(05) 051G 411th Ave - Fm US14 north 6 miles Rumble Stripe and Durable
Pavement Markings
Beadle 6.0 0.092 2016 0.102
39 NH 0037(149)113 05KE SD37 N&S from 2 miles South of the
SD244 JCT to North of 33rd ST SE
in Huron
Micro-surfacingBeadle
Sanborn
* 10.7 SD37N
SD37S
2.457 2016 2.999
40 NH 0014(178)346 02RY
NH 014B(02)419 02S0
US14 - 1.3 E of SD37 over the
James River; US14B - 1.6 W I 29
Interchange over East Br Six Mile Ck
Scour Protection Plus Guide Bank
on Str 03-253-180
Beadle
Brookings
0.0 US14
US14B
0.295 2017 0.359
41 BRO 8003(24) 01Y1 Structure 5E & 0.4N of Wessington
over Cain Creek
Structure & Approach GradingBeadle 0.2 0.280 2017 0.350
42 NH 0014(199)363 02Q9 US14 - Through The City Limits of
Iroquois
Roadway LightingBeadle
Kingsbury
0.5 US14 0.067 2017 0.084
43 PH 8003(25) 044E Various County Roads in Beadle
County
Signing & Delineation, PEBeadle 0.0 1.200 2017 1.200
44 PH 0014(205)347 04TX US14 - Intersection of US14 E&W
and Custer Ave in Huron
Intersection ModificationBeadle 0.0 US14E
US14W
0.239 2017 0.265
45 NH-P 0013(39) 05KL Various Routes in the Huron Area;
Various Routes in the Huron Area
Rout and Seal; Rout and SealBeadle
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
66.9 SD45
US14
US281
0.275 2017 0.335
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
43
By County
¥¥
Beadle
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
46 NH 0014(00)353 03VM
P 0025(00)114 03VL
US14 - In Cavour, Volga, DeSmet,
Arlington and Lake Preston; SD25 -
In DeSmet
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades ; ADA
Curb Ramp Upgrades
Beadle
Brookings
Kingsbury
6.2 SD25
US14
0.000 2018 0.565
47 BRO 8003(09) H086 7.6 S & 2 W of Cavour Over Pearl
Creek
Structure & Approach GradingBeadle 0.2 0.280 2018 0.350
48 P-PH 0037(144)133 04EN SD37 - Fm SD28, South 12 miles Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkBeadle 12.0 SD37 3.409 2018 4.369
49 P 0037(128)125 0271
NH 0014(200)345 04PK
SD37 - Fm US14 to 15th St. North in
Huron; Intersection of 21st St &
SD37 in Huron; US14 - At the
Intersection of SD37 in Huron
Urban Grading & PCC Surfacing,
Lighting, Intersection Improvement;
AC Surfacing & Turn Lane
modification
Beadle* 1.2 SD37
US14E
US14W
6.318 2018 8.333
50 NH-P 0013(40) 05L1 Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealsBeadle
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
151.4 SD20
SD25
SD26
SD37
SD45
SD47
US14
US212
US281
4.334 2018 5.289
51 P 0037(140)140 04FH SD37 - 4.9 mi S of the Spink Co Line
over the James River
Replace Structure (Bridge) and
Approach Grading
Beadle 0.0 SD37 2.308 2019 2.815
52 NH 0014(214)346 05DE US14, US14 E&W - Str. 0.5 E of
SD37 Over Ravine Lake (2), 1.3 E of
SD37 Over James River, 1.4 E of
SD37 (Commercial Route), 2.8 E of
Cavour Over Pearl Crk, & 2.7 W of
Iroquois
Epoxy Chip Seal & Joint
Replacement
Beadle 0.0 US14
US14E
US14W
0.497 2019 0.606
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
44
By County
¥¥
Bennett
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
53 IM-NH 0033(23) 053K Various Locations in the Winner
Area
Chip SealBennett
Jackson
46.0 I90E
I90W
SD73
1.876 2016 2.289
54 P 0073(72)0 05KN SD73 - Fm the Nebraska State Line
to Martin
Rout and SealBennett 12.3 SD73 0.053 2017 0.065
55 PH 0018(198)173 04XH US18 - Fm E of Vetal to the
Bennett/Todd County Line
Grading, Interim SurfacingBennett 2.9 US18 2.762 2018 3.069
56 NH-P 0033(25) 05L8 Various Routes in the Winner Area Chip SealBennett
Jackson
Tripp
31.9 SD44
SD73
US18
US18E
US18W
0.755 2018 0.920
57 NH 0033(26) 05LK Various Routes in the Winner Area Joint and Spall RepairBennett
Todd
45.7 US18 4.392 2018 5.360
58 NH 0018(200)148 04WT US18 - Fm the W Jct with SD73,
Through Martin to the Bennett/Todd
Co Line
Mill & AC Resurfacing, ADA Curb
Ramp Upgrades, Pipe Work
Bennett 26.4 US18 6.553 2019 8.089
59 PH 8004(02) 04HQ Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Bennett County
Signing & Delineation, PEBennett 0.0 0.268 2019 0.268
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
45
By County
¥¥
Bon Homme
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
60 NH-P 0023(45) 053L Various Locations in the Yankton
Area
Chip SealBon Homme
Hutchinson
Yankton
21.3 SD37P
SD44
SD52
0.767 2016 0.936
61 NH-P 0023(46) 054K Various Routes in the Yankton Area Rout and SealBon Homme
Charles Mix
23.6 SD37
SD37P
SD50
SD50E
SD50W
0.104 2016 0.126
62 PH 0037(145)30 053V Jct SD46/SD37 Installation of Rural Intersection
Conflict Warning System (RICWS)
Bon Homme 0.5 SD37
SD46
0.153 2016 0.153
63 P 0046(00)288 03VP
P 037P(00)12 03VQ
NH 0050(00)328 03VN
SD46 in Wagner; SD37P in
Springfield; SD50 in Wagner
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades; ADA
Curb Ramp Upgrades; ADA Curb
Ramp Upgrades
Bon Homme
Charles Mix
3.0 SD37P
SD46
SD50
0.000 2017 0.347
64 NH-P 0023(47) 055U Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Charles Mix
Hutchinson
Turner
Union
58.6 SD11
SD37
SD37P
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
SD50W
2.051 2017 2.502
65 NH-P 0023(48) 056K Various Routes in the Yankton Area Rout and SealBon Homme
Clay
Hutchinson
Yankton
48.7 SD314
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
0.201 2017 0.246
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
46
By County
¥¥
Bon Homme
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
66 NH-P 0023(49) 05L9 Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Clay
Hutchinson
Yankton
68.0 SD19
SD314
SD37
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
US18
1.949 2018 2.379
67 PH 0052(05)315 04HK
PH 0037(139)11 04HJ
SD37 - Fm N of Springfield to SD50;
SD52 - Fm SD37 to SD50
SD52 - Grading, Interim Surfacing
& Replace Strs (RCBC); SD37 -
Shoulder Widening, Culvert
Extensions, Pipe Work, Replace
Str (RCBC)
Bon Homme* 20.4 SD37
SD52
21.914 2019 22.588
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
47
By County
¥¥
Brookings
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
68 IM 0295(43)141 035B I29 - Strs, 1 Mi S of the Deuel Co
Line Over 197th St; 3.1 Mi S of the
Deuel Co Line Over North Deer
Creek; 4.4 Mi S of the Deuel Co Line
Over a Branch of North Deer Creek;
3 N of SD30 Over 201st St.; 0.6 N of
SD30 Over a Creek
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joint ModificationBrookings 0.0 I29N
I29S
0.580 2016 0.638
69 IM 0295(38)125 035C I29 - Strs, Over I29 at: SD30; 207th
St, 3 Mi S of SD30; 209th St, 2 Mi N
of US14B; SD324; 219th St, 1 Mi N
of the Moody Co Line; & SD28
Zone Paint/Paint Superstructure,
Girder Splice Repairs, Bearing
Retrofit, and/or Weld Repairs
Brookings
Deuel
0.0 I29N 1.267 2016 1.392
70 P-PH 0014(177)421 546N
IM 0295(40)132 04TW
US14 - Fm W of 22nd Ave in
Brookings East to E of 34th Ave; I29
- Exit 132 in Brookings
US14 - Grading, Str & PCC
Paving, Lighting & Signals; I29 -
Grading, Str, PCCP Surfacing,
Signals & Lighting
Brookings* 1.3 I29N
US14
US14E
US14W
14.018 2016 15.998
71 BRF 6295(10) 01W9 Structure 5.8N of Bruce over the Big
Sioux River (466 Ave)
Structure & Approach GradingBrookings 0.2 1.293 2016 1.617
72 BRF 6295(11) 01WA Structure 6.5N of Bruce over a creek
(466 Ave)
Structure & Approach GradingBrookings 0.2 0.350 2016 0.438
73 NH 0081(100)107 04DX US81 - Fm the South Junction of
US14, South 9 miles
Shoulder Improvement & Pipe
Work
Brookings
Kingsbury
6.8 US81 0.986 2016 1.232
74 NH 0012(192) 052T Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Joint and Spall RepairBrookings
Grant
Roberts
35.5 US12
US14
3.419 2016 4.172
75 P-PH 0014(177)421 05GQ US14 - Fm W of 22nd Ave in
Brookings East to E of 34th Ave
Prepurchase of Signal PolesBrookings 1.3 US14
US14E
US14W
0.075 2016 0.092
76 NH 0014(178)346 02RY
NH 014B(02)419 02S0
US14 - 1.3 E of SD37 over the
James River; US14B - 1.6 W I 29
Interchange over East Br Six Mile Ck
Scour Protection Plus Guide Bank
on Str 03-253-180
Beadle
Brookings
0.0 US14
US14B
0.295 2017 0.359
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
48
By County
¥¥
Brookings
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
77 P 3233(04) 03CS Eastbrook Drive from Sunrise Ridge
Road, W 0.33 mi. to 22nd Ave. S in
Brookings
Milling, AC Resurfacing, Pavement
Markings, ADA Upgrade
Brookings 0.0 0.246 2017 0.300
78 P 3233(03) 03CR Sunrise Ridge Road from 6th
St./US14, S 0.63 mi. to Eastbrook
Drive in Brookings
Milling, AC Resurfacing, Pavement
Markings, ADA Upgrade
Brookings 0.0 0.409 2017 0.499
79 P 3312(04) 04G6 3rd St. from Medary Ave., E 1 mi. to
22nd Ave. in Brookings
Milling, AC Overlay, Pavement
Markings, Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter,
ADA Upgrade
Brookings 1.0 0.452 2017 0.550
80 IM-P 0012(195) 055C Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
73.1 I29N
I29S
SD15
SD20
SD20E
SD20W
SD22
SD28
SD324
2.210 2017 2.697
81 NH-P 0012(196) 055X Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealBrookings
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
25.3 SD10
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
0.112 2017 0.137
82 NH 0014(00)353 03VM
P 0025(00)114 03VL
US14 - In Cavour, Volga, DeSmet,
Arlington and Lake Preston; SD25 -
In DeSmet
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades ; ADA
Curb Ramp Upgrades
Beadle
Brookings
Kingsbury
6.2 SD25
US14
0.000 2018 0.565
83 NH 0014(191)422 03UQ
NH 014B(06)422 03UR
US14 - Str.s 0.9 E of I29 Over the W
Branch of Deer Ck & 1.9 E of I29
Over Deer Ck; US14B - Str 1.4 E of
I29 Over Deer Ck
Scour ProtectionBrookings 0.0 US14
US14B
0.332 2018 0.405
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
49
By County
¥¥
Brookings
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
84 IM 0294(69)121 04NM I-29 Aberdeen Region Interstate Crossroad
Improvements
Brookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Moody
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.222 2018 0.244
85 NH-P 0012(203) 05L7 Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
84.0 SD10
SD101
SD15
SD22
SD30
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
2.483 2018 3.030
86 NH 0012(205) 05LJ Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Joint and Spall RepairBrookings
Codington
9.1 US14
US14E
US212
US212E
US212W
0.860 2018 1.050
87 IM 0295(41)127 04W0 I29 Strs - 3.0 S of the US14
Interchange, SD324 Interchange & 2
N of US 14B Interchange
Abutment Repair, Epoxy Chip SealBrookings 0.0 I29N
I29S
0.533 2019 0.586
88 P-PH 0014(179)419 027B US14 - Fm Main Ave. to Medary
Ave. in Brookings & the Intersections
of US14 & 12th Ave,
Urban Grading, Curb & Gutter,
Storm Sewer, Traffic Signals, ADA,
Sidewalk, Roadway Lighting &
PCC Surfacing
Brookings 0.7 US14 3.825 2019 4.499
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
50
By County
¥¥
Brookings
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
89 NH 0014(213)415 05DA
NH 014B(172)419 05DC
P 0022(59)379 05DD
US14E - Str 1.9 E of Volga Over the
Big Sioux River; US14 B - Strs 2.0
W of I29 Interchange Over Six Mile
Ck, 1.6 W of I29 Interchange over
East Branch of Six Mile Ck & 1.4 E
of I 29 Intechange Over Deer Ck;
SD22 - Str 8.7, 9.3 & 11.4 E of SD15
Over Cobb Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal, & Weld Repair
(20-193-160)
Brookings
Deuel
0.0 SD22
US14B
US14E
0.580 2019 0.708
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
51
By County
¥¥
Brown
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
90 P 2284(04) 02D1 8th Ave. NW, from US 281 E 0.5 mi.
in Aberdeen
Grading, Curb & Gutter, Storm
Sewer, Lighting, PCCP, Bike Path
Brown 0.5 3.114 2016 3.800
91 NH-P 0011(91) 053Q Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
95.6 SD10
SD25
SD37
SD45
US12
0.402 2016 0.491
92 PS 0012(182)289 04CR US12 - 6th Ave SW in Aberdeen,
crossing 394866Y, BNSF
Rehabilitation of crossing surfaceBrown 0.0 US12 0.081 2016 0.090
93 PH 6525(03) 04Q0 382nd Avenue (County Road
6/Richmond Lake Road) from 129th
Street (County Road 13) to 125th
Street in Brown County
PE, CE, ROW, Update/Replace
Guardrail and Bridge Ends
Brown 0.0 0.213 2016 0.235
94 PH 8007(211) 04R7 Various County, City, and Township
Roads in Brown County
Signing & Delineation, PEBrown 0.0 1.773 2016 1.773
95 P 0037(129)207 039K
NH 0012(198)308 05AV
SD37 - Fm Aspen Ave to US12 in
Groton;US12 - Fm the End of the
Divided Highway to First Street in
Groton
SD37 - Grading, Storm Sewer,
Curb & Gutter, Sidewalk, Roadway
Lighting, AC Surfacing; US12 -
Grading, Storm Sewer, Curb &
Gutter, Sidewalk, Roadway
Lighting, Traffic Signals & PCC
Surfacing
Brown 1.3 SD37
US12
4.374 2016 5.596
96 P TAPU(13) 05C9 Aberdeen - Along 15th Ave. NE from
the existing trail end east of
Northview Lane to Roosevelt St.
Shared Use Path ConstructionBrown 0.5 0.169 2016 0.206
97 P SRTS(27) 03X0 Groton Safe Routes to School, Sidewalk,
ADA Curb Ramps, Detectable
Warning Panels, and
Non-infrastructure Projects. PE
Brown 0.0 0.193 2016 0.193
98 PP 0037(146)207 05JQ SD37 - North Edge of Groton,
393745X, BNSF
Improve Railroad SignalsBrown 0.0 SD37 0.225 2016 0.250
99 P TAPU(03) 04Q7 In Aberdeen, on the East Side of
Roosevelt St. N., from 8th Ave. NE
to Milwaukee Ave. NE
Shared Use Path ConstructionBrown 0.5 0.165 2016 0.269
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
52
By County
¥¥
Brown
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
100 P 6251(00) 6718 Fm 1N & 1W of Stratford N 3 mi. on
395 Ave. (Co. Rd #16)
Spot Grading, Reclamation, AC
Surfacing
Brown 3.0 1.639 2016 2.000
101 NH-P 0011(92) 055A Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
125.9 SD10
SD25
SD27
SD37
SD45
SD47
US281N
US281S
4.164 2017 5.080
102 NH-P 0011(93) 055V Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Edmunds
Faulk
23.3 SD20
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
0.121 2017 0.148
103 P 0037(142)208 04X1
NH 0012(201)321 05HA
SD37 - Fm US12 at Groton N to
SD10; US12W - Jct with 136th
Street
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe Work,
Inslope Work; Pipe Work
Brown
Day
* 23.1 SD37
US12W
5.560 2018 7.109
104 PH 0281(106)185 04K6 US281 - Intersection at 142nd Street
(Warner) & Intersection of US281 &
130th St. N of Aberdeen
Intersection ModificationBrown 0.0 US281N
US281S
0.287 2018 0.318
105 NH 0012(269)269 04V1
P 0037(148)175 05FJ
US12, US12 E&W - Strs 6.7 East of
Ipswich Over Preachers Run Creek;
0.1 E of the Edmunds/Brown Co
Line Over Snake Creek (2); 0.7
West of US 281 South Over Foot
Creek; SD37 - Strs 6.4 N of US212
Over a branch of Fordham Ck, 7.7 N
of US212 Over Fordham Ck, 2.9 N
of Verdon Over a Ck.
Epoxy Chip SealBrown
Edmunds
Spink
0.0 SD37
US12
US12E
US12W
0.397 2018 0.484
106 NH-P 0011(105) 05KQ Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Walworth
31.9 SD37
US12
US12E
US12W
US83N
US83S
0.145 2018 0.177
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
53
By County
¥¥
Brown
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
107 NH-P 0011(104) 05KX Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealsBrown
Day
Edmunds
Faulk
Marshall
McPherson
103.6 SD20
SD239
SD25
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
US281
2.970 2018 3.625
108 P 0011(103) 05LC Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Crack LevelingBrown 14.0 SD10 0.357 2018 0.435
109 NH 0012(183)287 039F US12 - In Aberdeen from Melgaard
Road east to about the beginning of
the divided lanes; US12 -
Intersection of US12 & 385th Ave
Roadway LightingBrown 1.8 US12
US12E
US12W
0.355 2019 0.433
110 NH 0012(199)263 05EP US12 - Fm Ipswich to Aberdeen AC SurfacingBrown
Edmunds
29.2 US12
US12E
US12W
5.026 2019 6.133
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
54
By County
¥¥
Brule
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
111 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
112 P 0045(55)66 054V SD45 - Fm 5.2 M S of the
Brule/Buffalo County Line to SD34
Crack LevelingBrule
Buffalo
14.9 SD45 0.308 2016 0.375
113 PS 00SW(34) 057U Dakota Southern crossings from
Mitchell to Vivian
Replace CrossbucksAurora
Brule
Davison
Lyman
0.0 0.054 2016 0.060
114 P 0050(00)230 03BY
P 090L(00)263 03BZ
SD50 - Through Chamberlain; I90L -
Through Chamberlain
Curb Ramp UpgradesBrule 1.4 I90L
SD50
0.000 2017 0.480
115 BRF 6471(02) 03GK Structure 0.2N of Pukwana, on 350
Ave., over American Creek SN
08-145-098
Structure RehabilitationBrule 0.2 0.160 2017 0.200
116 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
117 IM 0906(71)289 04DG I90 - Strs, SD45S Interchange; SD25
Interchange, 5.5 E of SD50
Interchange Over 356 Ave; 6.0 E of
the Mt Vernon Interchange over I90
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joint
Modification, Abutment, Column &
Bent Cap Repair
Brule
Davison
Hanson
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.467 2018 0.514
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
55
By County
¥¥
Brule
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
118 IM 0906(70)263 04DR I90 - Strs, Over Main St & RR, Exit
263 (Chamberlain); Over I90, 2.5 W
of Exit 272 (SD50S), Exit 289
(SD45S), Aurora/Brule County Line,
2.6 W of Exit 296 (White Lake), Exit
310 (US281), 6.0 E of Exit 319 (Mt
Vernon), Exit 332 (SD37S)
Zone PaintingAurora
Brule
Davison
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.864 2018 0.950
119 P 0045(54)27 04WY SD45 - Fm Platte to I-90 Mill & AC ResurfacingBrule
Charles Mix
24.2 SD45 4.262 2018 5.235
120 P 0050(111)231 6953 SD50 - Fm K St to I-90 at
Chamberlain
Grading, Mill, AC Resurfacing,
Slide Area Repair, Pipe Work
Brule 3.7 SD50 6.021 2019 7.505
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
56
By County
¥¥
Buffalo
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
121 P 0034(150)272 02RW SD34 - Str 2.8 W of SD 50 S over
Campbell Ck
Replace Structure (Bridge) &
Approach Grading
Buffalo 0.0 SD34 0.926 2016 0.926
122 NH-P 0013(35) 054D Various Locations in the Huron Area Rout and SealBuffalo
Clark
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
96.0 SD25
SD28
SD34
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
0.388 2016 0.473
123 P 0045(55)66 054V SD45 - Fm 5.2 M S of the
Brule/Buffalo County Line to SD34
Crack LevelingBrule
Buffalo
14.9 SD45 0.308 2016 0.375
124 PH 6804(09) 051F BIA Route 4 - Fm the SD47/SD249
Intersection to SD50
Rumble Stripe and Durable
Pavement Markings
Buffalo 5.2 0.816 2016 0.816
125 P 0047(99)89 039V SD47 - Str 0.3 NE of the Big Bend
Dam Over Soldier Creek
Scour ProtectionBuffalo 0.0 SD47 0.440 2017 0.440
126 P 0034(164)257 040A SD34 - From the N Jct with SD47 to
the Jct with SD50
Pipe WorkBuffalo
Hyde
17.6 SD34 2.067 2017 2.948
127 P 0034(168)283 04EF SD34 - From 8.5 mi W of SD45 to
SD45
Mill & AC Resurfacing; Pipe WorkBuffalo 8.5 SD34 1.998 2017 2.550
128 NH-P 0013(36) 055F Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealBuffalo
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
* 139.4 SD25
SD26
SD28
SD34
SD45
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
4.801 2017 5.860
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
57
By County
¥¥
Buffalo
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
129 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
130 P 0050(113)211 04EH
P 0249(02)73 04EE
P 0047(107)88 04ED
P 0034(169)269 04EC
SD249 - Through Fort Thompson;
SD47 - Through Fort Thompson;
SD34 - Fm Ft Thompson to SD 50;
SD50 - Fm SD34 South to the
Buffalo/Brule County Line
SD249, SD47 & SD34 - Mill & AC
Resurfacing, Lighting; SD50 - Mill
& AC Resurfacing, Pipe Work
Buffalo 19.9 SD249
SD34
SD47
SD50
4.926 2018 6.732
131 P 0045(56)88 05EY SD45 - Fm S of the Hand/Buffalo
County Line to S of Miller
AC ResurfacingBuffalo
Hand
13.1 SD45 3.772 2018 4.602
132 NH-P 0021(161) 05L2 Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
McCook
Sanborn
130.3 SD1806
SD25
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
SD44
SD50
US18
US281
US81
3.736 2018 4.560
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
58
By County
¥¥
Butte
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
133 P 6109(04) 04LJ
P 8212(02) 04RA
P 8611(02) 04RD
P 6575(01) 04RE
From SD79 7S of Newell, E 6 mi. on
Valley Township Road to 137 Ave.
(FA 6109); Business 212, from
US212 E of Belle Fourche, SW 0.5
mi. (FA 2212); Ziebach Street, from
Helmer Road E of Belle Fourche, W
0.75 mi. (FA 6611); Fruitdale Road,
from 8 E of Belle Fourche, S 1.25
mi.
(FA 6575)
Chip SealButte 8.6 0.344 2016 0.420
134 BRF 6237(00) 02F2 Structure 35.5N & 4.5E of Belle
Fourche over Alkali Creek
Structure & Approach GradingButte 0.2 0.000 2016 0.351
135 P 6434(02) 00RJ
P 6575(02) 057L
Fm 0.5 S & 1.5 E of the Center of
Belle Fourche, E 0.5 mi. (Snoma
Road); From 0.7 mi. S of the Jct. of
US212 and Fruitdale Road, S 0.5 mi.
Light Grading, Slope Flattening,
AC Surfacing; Asphalt Overlay
Butte 1.0 1.130 2016 1.380
136 NH-P 0042(61) 055E Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Chip SealButte
Harding
Meade
Perkins
71.9 SD20
SD79
US85
2.520 2017 3.074
137 P 0079(74)133 056L SD79 - Fm US212 in Newell, N 11
Miles
Micro-SurfacingButte 11.1 SD79 1.053 2017 1.285
138 NH 0085(84)36 03U6
NH 0212(164)33 03U7
NH 0079(70)127 03U8
US85 - Str.s 2 N of Belle Fourche
Over Crow Creek, 10.8 N of Belle
Fourche Over Owl Ck,.6 NE of
US212 over Indian Ck & 0.3 S of I90
Over Miller Ck; US212 - Str.s 1.5 NE
of Newell Over Dry Creek & 5.7 NE
of Newell Over Willow Ck; SD79 -
Strs 2 N of the Meade Co Line Over
the Belle Fourche River & 10 N of
Newell/ E Jct of US212 Over S
Willow Creek
Scour Protection and/or Column
Repair
Butte
Lawrence
0.0 SD79
US212
US85
US85S
0.692 2018 0.845
139 NH 0085(87)56 04G3 US85 - 0.4 mi S of US212, 2 mi N of
Belle Fourche, 10.8 mi N of Belle
Fourche & 16 mi NE of US212 Over
the Belle Fource River, Over Crow
Ck, Over Owl Ck & Over Indian Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joints, Deck
Overlay, Replace Bridge Rail,
Approach Pavement
Butte 0.0 US85 0.968 2018 1.181
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
59
By County
¥¥
Butte
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
140 BRF 6410(08) 02F5 Structure 16.3E & 2N of Newell (SN
10-473-320) and 22.8E & 2N of
Newell (SN 10-538-320) over a
creek
Structures & Approach GradingButte 0.4 0.299 2018 0.568
141 NH 0085(91)78 04WE US85 - Fm S of the Jct with SD168
to N of the Jct with SD168;
US85-Through Buffalo
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkButte
Harding
* 21.3 US85 8.169 2018 10.197
142 NH-P 0042(66) 05LA Various Locations in the Belle
Fourche Area
Crack LevelingButte
Meade
74.0 SD168
SD79
US212
1.876 2018 2.290
143 NH 0042(68) 05LE Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Joint and Spall RepairButte 3.6 US212 0.345 2018 0.420
144 P 0034(179)10 05EW SD34 - Fm US85 to I90 Mill & AC ResurfacingButte
Lawrence
17.2 SD34 4.574 2019 5.582
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
60
By County
¥¥
Campbell
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
145 P 6477(05) 04VN
P 6104(04) 04VP
From SD1804, 10W & 7S of Mound
City, S 2mi. On 295 Ave. (FA 6477 /
Co. Rd 477A); From 2E of US83 at
Herreid, E 11 mi. on 108 St. (FA
6104 / Co. Rd. 830A)
AC Overlay and Chip SealCampbell 2.0 0.538 2016 1.211
146 NH-P 0032(25) 053G Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
McPherson
Potter
Walworth
115.7 SD10
SD130
SD1804
SD20
SD271
SD65
US12
US83
3.869 2016 4.721
147 P 0032(26) 054F Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Rout and SealCampbell
Edmunds
McPherson
30.5 SD1804
SD47
0.130 2016 0.158
148 P 0010(108)182 04FF SD10 - Through Pollock Replace Existing LightingCampbell 0.1 SD10E
SD10W
0.075 2016 0.094
149 NH-P 0032(27) 055J Various Routes in the Mobridge Area Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Walworth
53.3 SD1804
SD65
US12
US83
1.978 2017 2.414
150 P 6573(03) 05LU Fm the Jct. of SD10 and SD271, 3N
& 13E of Mound City, S 10.5 mi. on
319 Ave. (FA 6573/Co. Rd 271A), W
4 mi. on 122 St., and S 2 mi. on 315
Ave. (FA 6573 / Co. Rd 271A)
Chip SealCampbell 16.5 0.536 2017 0.825
Total = $0.825; STP/Match = $0.654, Local = $0.171
151 P 1804(45)357 0397 SD1804 - Fm N of Mobridge to
Pollock
Mill & AC Resurfacing; Str Rail
Retrofit
Campbell
Walworth
35.2 SD1804 5.996 2018 7.488
152 NH-P 0032(29) 05L3 Various Routes in the Mobridge Area Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
45.3 SD271
US12
US212
1.299 2018 1.585
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
61
By County
¥¥
Campbell
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
153 P 0010(119)183 05DH
P 0063( )186 05DN
P 0065(18)199 05DP
SD10 - Str 1.0 E of Pollock Over
Lake Pocasse; SD63 - Str 13 N of
Jct US212 over the Moreau River;
SD65 - Str. 0.4 N of Dewey County
Line Over Firesteel Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal; Epoxy Chip Seal;
Pourable Joint Seal
Campbell
Corson
Dewey
0.0 SD10
SD63
SD65
0.242 2019 0.294
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
62
By County
¥¥
Charles Mix
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
154 P 0050(104)302 03AG
P 0046(57)291 03AH
SD50 - 3.6 S of Geddes over a
Branch of Pease Ck; SD46 - 2.0 E
Of Wagner over a Creek
SD50 Replace Drop Outlet and
Riprap; SD 46 Replace Inlet and
Outlet Aprons and Riprap
Charles Mix 0.0 SD46
SD50
0.432 2016 0.528
155 BRO 8012(17) 02X2 Structure 2N & 0.4W of Wagner over
a creek SN 12-506-270
Structure & Approach GradingCharles Mix 0.2 0.226 2016 0.284
156 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
157 NH-P 0023(46) 054K Various Routes in the Yankton Area Rout and SealBon Homme
Charles Mix
23.6 SD37
SD37P
SD50
SD50E
SD50W
0.104 2016 0.126
158 P 1804(43)115 04F8 SD1804 - 5 miles S of SD44;
Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Pipe ReplacementCharles Mix 0.0 SD1804 0.368 2016 0.471
159 P 0046(00)288 03VP
P 037P(00)12 03VQ
NH 0050(00)328 03VN
SD46 in Wagner; SD37P in
Springfield; SD50 in Wagner
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades; ADA
Curb Ramp Upgrades; ADA Curb
Ramp Upgrades
Bon Homme
Charles Mix
3.0 SD37P
SD46
SD50
0.000 2017 0.347
160 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
63
By County
¥¥
Charles Mix
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
161 NH-P 0023(47) 055U Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Charles Mix
Hutchinson
Turner
Union
58.6 SD11
SD37
SD37P
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
SD50W
2.051 2017 2.502
162 P 0044(182)291 04G2 SD44 - At the Charles Mix - Gregory
County Line Over Lake Francis Case
Epoxy Chip Seal, Weld RepairCharles Mix 0.0 SD44 1.254 2018 1.530
163 NH 0018(188)320 04EA
NH 0046(62)278 04T8
NH 0046(69)288 05JN
NH 0050(121)329 05JP
US18 - Fm US281 E to Pickstown;
SD46 - 1.6 miles east of the US18
Junction at Pickstown; SD46 in
Wagner; SD50 in Wagner
US18 - Mill & AC Resurfacing,
Guardrail, Lighting, & Slide Repair;
SD46 - Slide Repair; SD46 - AC
Overlay; SD50 - AC Overlay
Charles Mix
Gregory
* 12.7 SD46
SD50
US18
4.938 2018 6.170
164 P 0045(54)27 04WY SD45 - Fm Platte to I-90 Mill & AC ResurfacingBrule
Charles Mix
24.2 SD45 4.262 2018 5.235
165 NH-P 0021(161) 05L2 Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
McCook
Sanborn
130.3 SD1806
SD25
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
SD44
SD50
US18
US281
US81
3.736 2018 4.560
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
64
By County
¥¥
Clark
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
166 P 0028(35)297 03A2 SD28 - 1.7 E Spink Co Line over
Shue Ck & 2.8 E Spink Co Line over
Branch Shue Ck
Replace Structure (RCBC) and
Approach Grading
Clark 0.0 SD28 0.670 2016 0.818
167 P 0020(124)363 025V
PH 0025(77)164 04J6
SD20 - Fm E of Crocker to SD25;
Intersection of SD25 & SD20
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe Work
& Erosion Repair ; Intersection
Modification
Clark 9.0 SD20
SD25
3.078 2016 3.742
168 P 0028(32)319 02QK SD28 - Fm the south Jct. with SD25
to east of Bryant
Mill & AC Resurfacing, ADA
Upgrades and Drainage
Improvements in Bryant
Clark
Hamlin
9.9 SD28 2.668 2016 3.329
169 IM-P 0012(193) 053A Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealClark
Codington
Deuel
Hamlin
52.2 I29N
I29S
SD20
1.873 2016 2.285
170 NH-P 0013(35) 054D Various Locations in the Huron Area Rout and SealBuffalo
Clark
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
96.0 SD25
SD28
SD34
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
0.388 2016 0.473
171 BRO 8013(11) 6786 3.7 N & 2 W of Carpenter Over a
Creek
Structure & Approach GradingClark 0.2 0.298 2017 0.372
172 BRO 8013(03) 6787 3 E & 6.2 N of Carpenter over a
creek
Structure & Approach GradingClark 0.2 0.227 2017 0.284
173 NH-P 0013(36) 055F Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealBuffalo
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
* 139.4 SD25
SD26
SD28
SD34
SD45
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
4.801 2017 5.860
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
65
By County
¥¥
Clark
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
174 NH 0212(00)327 04P7 US212 - Through Doland and Clark ADA Curb Ramp UpgradesClark
Spink
1.0 US212 0.000 2018 0.229
175 BRO 8013(13) 02EJ Structure 8.3N & 1E of Raymond
over a creek
Structure & Approach GradingClark 0.2 0.227 2018 0.284
176 NH-P 0013(41) 05KR Various Routes in the Huron Area Rout and SealClark
Hamlin
Spink
21.0 SD20
SD25
SD28
US212
US281
0.086 2018 0.105
177 NH-P 0013(40) 05L1 Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealsBeadle
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
151.4 SD20
SD25
SD26
SD37
SD45
SD47
US14
US212
US281
4.334 2018 5.289
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
66
By County
¥¥
Clay
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
178 BRO 8014(26) 6867 5.6 S & 11 E of Irene Over a Creek Structure & Approach GradingClay 0.2 0.226 2016 0.284
179 IM-P 0023(44) 052V Various Routes in the Yankton Area Joint and Spall RepairClay
Lincoln
Union
Yankton
15.4 I29N
I29S
SD19
SD50
SD50EL
SD50L
SD50WL
SD52
1.651 2016 2.016
180 PH 0020(139) 04GP Mitchell Region Intersection ImprovementsClay
Lincoln
McCook
Minnehaha
Moody
Turner
1.5 SD11
SD115
SD19
SD34
SD42
SD44
US81
0.459 2016 0.510
181 BRF 6475(08) 01WB Structure 13E & 1.1S of Irene over
Ash Creek (29810 Univ. Rd)
Structure & Approach GradingClay 0.2 0.602 2016 0.753
182 PH 8014(34) 051D Burbank Road - Fm intersection with
Natalie Ct to intersection with 470th
Ave
Rumble Stripe and Durable
Pavement Markings
Clay 6.0 0.092 2016 0.102
183 P-PH 0046(47)356 025D SD46 - Fm W of SD19/SD19A to W
of the Jct. with I29
Minor Grading, Shoulder Widening,
Str.s, AC Resurfacing & Culvert
Replacement Over Ash Creek, Left
Turn Lanes at SD19/SD19A;
Replace Structure (Bridge) and
Approach Grading
Clay* 8.1 SD46 11.706 2017 12.969
184 BRO 8014(25) 6868 0.6 S & 15 E of Irene Over Ash
Creek
Structure & Approach GradingClay 0.2 0.298 2017 0.372
185 P 5708(06) 04AG Intersections of Main St. & Center
St., Main St. & Dakota St., and Main
St. & University St. in Vermillion
Traffic Signals, Sidewalk, ADA
Upgrade
Clay 0.0 0.410 2017 0.500
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
67
By County
¥¥
Clay
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
186 NH-P 0050(97)411 023L
P 0050(102)417 037D
P 050L(02)411 05CL
SD50/SD50 EBL - Fm Vermillion to
I29; SD50 - Fm I29 to SD11;
SD50EL and SD50WL- SD50 Loop
at Vermillion
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe Work,
Culvert Rehab/Repair
Clay
Union
11.9 SD50
SD50E
SD50EL
SD50WL
4.032 2017 5.074
SD50 & SD50 E - Fm Vermillion to I29
187 P 0023(34) 03JL Various Routes in the Yankton Area GrindingClay
Union
Yankton
8.6 I29N
I29S
SD46
US81
US81N
US81S
0.985 2017 1.203
188 NH-P 0023(48) 056K Various Routes in the Yankton Area Rout and SealBon Homme
Clay
Hutchinson
Yankton
48.7 SD314
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
0.201 2017 0.246
189 BRO 8014(35) 5756 Structure 7.5E & 5.1S of Irene over
Frog Creek on Norwegian Ave. just
S. of 302 St. SN 14-075-051
Structure & Approach GradingClay 0.2 0.316 2018 0.396
190 NH-P 0023(49) 05L9 Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Clay
Hutchinson
Yankton
68.0 SD19
SD314
SD37
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
US18
1.949 2018 2.379
191 PH 0046(60)347 04J5 SD46 - Fm Irene to W of
SD19/SD19A
Shoulder Widening, Extend Culvert
(RCBC), Pipe Work
Clay 9.4 SD46 9.811 2019 10.901
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
68
By County
¥¥
Codington
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
192 IM 0294(66)164 034T I29 - Strs, US212 Interchange; US81
Interchange; 1.7 N of US212
Interchange Over Willow Creek; 2.3
SE of US212 over 458th Ave; At the
Hamlin/Codington Co Line Over
462nd Ave; At the SD22
Interchange; Over RR, 4.8 S of
SD20 Interchange
Epoxy Chip SealsCodington
Hamlin
0.0 I29N
I29S
US81
1.149 2016 1.263
193 BRF 4301(02) 00WF Structure on S. Broadway in
Watertown over the Big Sioux River
(City owned)
Structure & Approach GradingCodington 0.2 1.000 2016 1.250
194 NH 0212(162)380 03RN US212 - From Watertown to the
Intersection of Co Road
312/Goodwin Road
PCC SurfacingCodington
Deuel
* 9.3 US212 7.720 2016 9.644
195 P 0020(122)383 037U SD20 - Fm Florence to Watertown Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkCodington 10.7 SD20 2.832 2016 3.537
196 IM-P 0012(193) 053A Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealClark
Codington
Deuel
Hamlin
52.2 I29N
I29S
SD20
1.873 2016 2.285
197 P 0012(194) 053T Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealCodington
Deuel
Grant
28.0 SD15
SD20
SD20E
SD20W
0.126 2016 0.154
198 P 0081(93)157 026X US81 - Fm 3rd Ave. NE to 18th Ave.
NE in Watertown
Urban Grading, Roadway Lighting,
Storm Sewer, Curb & Gutter,
Sidewalk, Traffic Signals, PCC
Surfacing
Codington 1.3 US81 7.499 2016 9.900
199 PH 6127(06) 051J 455th Ave - Fm the intersection with
US81 north to Codington/Grant
County line
Rumble Stripe and Durable
Pavement Markings
Codington 15.0 0.207 2016 0.230
200 PS 4310(11) 01VG 1st Ave. N. in Watertown, 075-501M,
BNSF
Construction & PE for
Consolidating Railroad Crossings
Codington 0.0 0.315 2016 0.350
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
69
By County
¥¥
Codington
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
201 P TAPU(04) 04QA In Watertown, from Existing Trail
End at Sunset Dr., Along the South
Side of North Lake Dr. Through
Memorial Park and Continue to
ParkView Drive.
Shared Use Path ConstructionCodington 1.3 0.244 2016 0.582
202 PH 8015(37) 02MZ Various County & Township Roads
in Codington County
Signing & DelineationCodington 0.0 1.490 2016 1.490
203 IM-P 0012(195) 055C Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
73.1 I29N
I29S
SD15
SD20
SD20E
SD20W
SD22
SD28
SD324
2.210 2017 2.697
204 PP 0212(170)376 04CA US212 in Watertown, crossing
075504H, BNSF
Upgrade Signal System and
Crossing Surface Rehabilitation
Codington 0.0 US212 0.324 2017 0.360
205 IM 0294(69)121 04NM I-29 Aberdeen Region Interstate Crossroad
Improvements
Brookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Moody
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.222 2018 0.244
206 BRO 8015(38) 04YH Structure 5S & 2.5E of Watertown,
on 177 St., over the Big Sioux River
SN 15-215-230
Structure & Approach GradingCodington 0.2 0.438 2018 0.548
207 P 0020(158)416 037V SD20 - Fm W of I29 to the
Codington/Grant County Line
Mill & AC Resurfacing; ADA
Upgrades & Pipe Work
Codington 10.8 SD20 2.562 2018 3.127
208 NH 0212(166)358 03TF US212 - In Henry Urban Reconstruction, PCC
Surfacing, Curb & Gutter, ADA
Upgrades. Sidewalk, Roadway
Lighting
Codington 0.6 US212 2.576 2018 3.294
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
70
By County
¥¥
Codington
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
209 NH 0081(105)155 04YQ US81 - Intersection of 20th Ave SE
(South Connector) in Watertown
Intersection ImprovementsCodington 0.0 US81 1.392 2018 1.769
210 P 0012(204) 05KV Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealCodington
Hamlin
16.7 SD20
SD28
0.069 2018 0.084
211 NH 0012(205) 05LJ Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Joint and Spall RepairBrookings
Codington
9.1 US14
US14E
US212
US212E
US212W
0.860 2018 1.050
212 IM 0299(75)206 04VY I29 - Strs, 0.6 S of the US12, 8 N of
US212, 2 S of Roberts Co Line, 6.2
S of US12 and 2 N of Codington Co
Line
Epoxy Chip SealCodington
Grant
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.725 2019 0.798
213 NH 0212(168)376 027Q US212 - Fm SD20 to US81 in
Watertown
Grading, PCCP Surfacing,
Replace Structure (Bridge), Curb &
Gutter, Sidewalk, ADA, Roadway
Lighting
Codington* 0.9 US212 7.808 2019 9.978
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
71
By County
¥¥
Corson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
214 P 1806(06)365 02A7
NH 0012(152)187 02A6
NH 0212(149)208 02A8
SD1806 - 0.4 mi N of US12; US12 -
Missouri River Bridge at Mobridge;
US212 - Missouri River Bridge at
Forest City
Substructure WorkCorson
Potter
Walworth
0.0 SD1806
US12
US212
2.692 2016 3.060
215 BRO 8016(08) 01DN Structure 2.4E & 9.7S of McIntosh
over White Shirt Creek
Structure & Approach GradingCorson 0.2 0.240 2016 0.300
216 NH-P 0032(25) 053G Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
McPherson
Potter
Walworth
115.7 SD10
SD130
SD1804
SD20
SD271
SD65
US12
US83
3.869 2016 4.721
217 P TAPR(02) 04QG Near McLaughlin, Along Existing
Pathway.
Pathway Lighting ConstructionCorson 0.0 0.275 2016 0.335
218 P 0063(38)240 00LH SD63 - 11.3 S of McLaughlin Over
the Grand River
Scour Protection (Bank
Stabilization)
Corson 0.0 SD63 1.999 2016 1.999
219 NH 0012(175)106 03UA
NH 0212(161)135 03UC
P 0063(46)146 03UD
P 0063(45)144 03WC
US12 - Str.s 6.7 E of the Perkins Co
Line Over Hay Ck; US212 - Str.s 0.5
W of Dupree Over Bear Ck; SD63 -
Str 1.7 N of the Haakon Co Line
Over Dupree Ck; SD63 - Str 0.5 S of
the Ziebach/Haakon Co Line Over
Hermaphrodite Ck
Scour ProtectionCorson
Haakon
Ziebach
0.0 SD63
US12
US212
0.488 2017 0.511
220 NH-P 0032(27) 055J Various Routes in the Mobridge Area Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Walworth
53.3 SD1804
SD65
US12
US83
1.978 2017 2.414
221 NH 0012(202)121 05KM US12 - Fm 0.7 miles W of Watauga
to McIntosh
Rout and SealCorson 8.8 US12 0.041 2017 0.050
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
72
By County
¥¥
Corson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
222 NH-P 0032(29) 05L3 Various Routes in the Mobridge Area Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
45.3 SD271
US12
US212
1.299 2018 1.585
223 NH 0032(28) 05LD Various Routes in the Mobridge Area Crack LevelingCorson 14.2 US12 0.348 2018 0.424
224 P 0065(17)193 04ER SD65 - Fm Isabel to the Grand River Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkCorson
Dewey
20.5 SD65 5.084 2019 6.349
225 P 0010(119)183 05DH
P 0063( )186 05DN
P 0065(18)199 05DP
SD10 - Str 1.0 E of Pollock Over
Lake Pocasse; SD63 - Str 13 N of
Jct US212 over the Moreau River;
SD65 - Str. 0.4 N of Dewey County
Line Over Firesteel Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal; Epoxy Chip Seal;
Pourable Joint Seal
Campbell
Corson
Dewey
0.0 SD10
SD63
SD65
0.242 2019 0.294
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
73
By County
¥¥
Custer
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
226 P 6419(08) 04VK From the Junction of Park Ave. and
Sidney Park Road, South of US16A
in Custer, S 3.5 mi. to Flynn Creek
Road
Chip SealCuster 3.5 0.100 2016 0.122
227 P 6641(02) 04VL
P 6642(02) 04VM
From the Junction of US16A and N.
Playhouse Road, N 1.25 mi. to the
North County Line (CS359 / FA
6641); From the Junction of US16A
and S. Playhouse Road, S 1.25 mi.
to the Custer State Park Boundary
(CS 753 / FA 6642)
Chip Seal; Chip SealCuster 2.6 0.214 2016 0.262
228 NH-P 0016(86)11 054A Various Locations in the Custer Area Rout and SealCuster
Pennington
21.1 US16
US16A
US16AE
US16AW
0.092 2016 0.112
229 PH 0040(214) 04GR SD87/US16A Jct Intersection ImprovementsCuster 0.0 SD87
US16A
0.353 2016 0.392
230 P 0040(21)38 03T7 SD40 - Fm Hayward to the South
Jct. with SD79 at Hermosa
AC ResurfacingCuster
Pennington
8.8 SD40 2.165 2016 2.704
231 BRO 8017(03) H072 Structure 4.5SE of Custer over
French Creek SN 17-268-086
Structure & Approach GradingCuster 0.1 0.228 2016 0.286
232 P 0040(237)68 05KH
P 0036(11)41 05KK
SD40 - Approximately 1 mile North
of the Cheyenne River; SD36 -
Approximately 4 miles West of the
Junction with SD79
Slide RepairCuster 0.4 SD36
SD40
0.550 2016 0.612
233 P 0040(22)65 03TV SD40 - Str 17.5 SE of Hermosa Over
Battle Ck.
Replace Structure (Bridge) and
Approach Grading
Custer 0.0 SD40 0.948 2017 1.157
234 NH 0016(85)22 04E6 US16, US16A, & US16AE&AW -
From Appx 3.5 W of Custer to the
West side of Custer State Park
Mill & AC ResurfacingCuster 8.3 US16
US16A
US16AE
US16AW
5.291 2017 6.457
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
74
By County
¥¥
Custer
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
235 NH-P 0043(16) 055D Various Routes in the Custer Area Chip SealCuster
Pennington
41.9 SD40
US16
US16A
US16AE
US16AW
1.453 2017 1.774
236 NH-P 0043(17) 056A Various Routes in the Custer Area Rout and SealCuster
Oglala Lakota
31.3 SD391
SD87
US18
0.134 2017 0.163
237 BRO 8017(05) 00Z3 Structure 0.2N of Hermosa over a
creek (Structure owned by City of
Hermosa)
Structure & Approach GradingCuster 0.2 0.227 2018 0.284
238 PH 8017(07) 04AR Custer State Park, Custer State Park
Road 3 from Wildlife Loop to 4 Mile
Draw Road
Guardrail, Signing, Delineation,
Curve Widening
Custer 0.0 0.669 2018 0.819
239 NH-P 0040(238) 05KU Various Routes in the Rapid City
Region
Rout and SealCuster
Lawrence
Pennington
24.2 SD40
US14A
US14E
US14W
0.099 2018 0.121
240 NH-P 0043(19) 05L0 Various Routes in the Custer Area Chip SealCuster
Oglala Lakota
31.3 SD391
SD87
US18
0.134 2018 0.163
241 NH 0043(20) 05LF Various Routes in the Custer Area Joint and Spall RepairCuster
Pennington
28.5 US16
US16E
US16W
US385
2.745 2018 3.350
242 NH 0079(73)35 05DQ
P 0040(235)43 05DR
SD79N - Str 2.7 N of Fall River
County Line Over Beaver Ck; SD40 -
Str 4.4 W of Jct SD79 Over Battle
Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal and Column
Repair; Replace Compression
Seals
Custer 0.0 SD40
SD79N
0.137 2019 0.166
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
75
By County
¥¥
Davison
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
243 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
244 PP 3751(20) 05JV West 8th Avenue in Mitchell,
386033E, BNSF
Install Railroad Signals & Crossing
Surface Impovements
Davison 0.0 0.333 2016 0.370
245 PS 0037(135)74 04CH SD37 - Ohlman St in Mitchell,
crossing 386036A, Dakota Southern
Crossing Surface RehabilitationDavison 0.0 SD37 0.068 2016 0.076
246 PS 00SW(34) 057U Dakota Southern crossings from
Mitchell to Vivian
Replace CrossbucksAurora
Brule
Davison
Lyman
0.0 0.054 2016 0.060
247 P SRTS(26) 03WY Ethan Safe Route To School .Traffic
Signs, Flashing Beacons,
Cross-walks, and
Non-infrastructure Projects. PE
Davison 0.0 0.037 2016 0.037
248 P 0038(44)300 0556 SD38 - Fm I90 Loop to SD38P in
Mitchell
Joint, Spall and Shoulder RepairDavison
Hanson
3.6 SD38 0.274 2017 0.334
249 NH-P 0021(160) 056E Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Rout and SealDavison
McCook
Sanborn
24.3 SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
0.221 2017 0.269
250 PH 0037(130)72 03B1
PH 090L(08)332 03KE
SD37 NB & SB (Burr St at Mitchell) -
Fm the Beginning of the Divided
Highway N to the Exit 332 West
Bound Ramps; 90L EB & WB (Burr
St. at Mitchell) - Fm the Exit 332
West Bound Ramps N to Havens
Urban Grading, PCC Surfacing,
Curb & Gutter, Roadway Lighting,
Traffic Signals, ADA Upgrades,
Storm Sewer, Sidewalk
Davison* 1.5 I90EL
I90WL
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
10.331 2017 11.921
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
76
By County
¥¥
Davison
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
251 IM 0906(71)289 04DG I90 - Strs, SD45S Interchange; SD25
Interchange, 5.5 E of SD50
Interchange Over 356 Ave; 6.0 E of
the Mt Vernon Interchange over I90
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joint
Modification, Abutment, Column &
Bent Cap Repair
Brule
Davison
Hanson
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.467 2018 0.514
252 IM 0906(70)263 04DR I90 - Strs, Over Main St & RR, Exit
263 (Chamberlain); Over I90, 2.5 W
of Exit 272 (SD50S), Exit 289
(SD45S), Aurora/Brule County Line,
2.6 W of Exit 296 (White Lake), Exit
310 (US281), 6.0 E of Exit 319 (Mt
Vernon), Exit 332 (SD37S)
Zone PaintingAurora
Brule
Davison
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.864 2018 0.950
253 BRO 8018(07) 03GR Structure 2W & 13.4S of Mitchell, on
407 Ave., over South Fork of Twelve
Mile Creek SN 18-130-234
Structure & Approach GradingDavison 0.2 0.227 2018 0.284
254 NH 0037(117)78 023F SD37 - Fm the north urban boundary
of Mitchell to south of the
Davison/Sanborn County Line
PCC Resurfacing; Deck Overlay,
Replace Approach Slabs
Davison* 4.0 SD37N
SD37S
7.932 2018 9.902
255 PH 0037(147)067 05K4 Jct of SD37 with 256th Street, 258th
Street, 259th Street, and 260th
Street.
Intersection ImprovementsDavison 0.0 SD37 0.955 2018 1.061
256 NH-P 0021(161) 05L2 Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
McCook
Sanborn
130.3 SD1806
SD25
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
SD44
SD50
US18
US281
US81
3.736 2018 4.560
257 IM 0907(82)319 04DN I90 - Str, Exit 319 (Mt Vernon) Deck Replacement, Abutments &
Painting
Davison 0.0 I90E 1.033 2019 1.135
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
77
By County
¥¥
Day
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
258 NH 0012(191)318 04WA US12E - Fm Andover to Bristol AC ResurfacingDay 10.0 US12E 2.265 2016 2.764
259 P 0025(79)182 052X SD25 - Fm US12, N 10.8 Mi Chip SealDay 11.0 SD25 0.361 2016 0.441
260 NH-P 0011(91) 053Q Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
95.6 SD10
SD25
SD37
SD45
US12
0.402 2016 0.491
261 P-PH 6147(12) 02SN Day County #01 from 142 St. on the
S side of at Waubay, S 2 miles on
446 Ave., East 1 mile on 144 St.,
and S 3 miles on 447 Ave. to 147 St.
RSI Category Day Co. Rd. #1 (447th
Ave.) Between 145th St. and 147th
St.
Grading, Base Course, AC
Surfacing, RSI Category - Grading
to Correct Horizontal & Vertical
Alignment, Reduce Shoulder Drop
Off, & Lengthen Pipe.
Day 6.0 1.652 2017 2.601
Total = $2.58; STPw/Match = $1.445; Local or SIB = $0.635; RSI = $0.5
262 NH-P 0011(92) 055A Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
125.9 SD10
SD25
SD27
SD37
SD45
SD47
US281N
US281S
4.164 2017 5.080
263 PH 8019(16) 02UH Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Day County
Signing & Delineation, PEDay 0.0 1.870 2017 1.870
264 P 0037(142)208 04X1
NH 0012(201)321 05HA
SD37 - Fm US12 at Groton N to
SD10; US12W - Jct with 136th
Street
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe Work,
Inslope Work; Pipe Work
Brown
Day
* 23.1 SD37
US12W
5.560 2018 7.109
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
78
By County
¥¥
Day
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
265 NH-P 0011(105) 05KQ Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Walworth
31.9 SD37
US12
US12E
US12W
US83N
US83S
0.145 2018 0.177
266 NH-P 0011(104) 05KX Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealsBrown
Day
Edmunds
Faulk
Marshall
McPherson
103.6 SD20
SD239
SD25
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
US281
2.970 2018 3.625
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
79
By County
¥¥
Deuel
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
267 IM 0295(38)125 035C I29 - Strs, Over I29 at: SD30; 207th
St, 3 Mi S of SD30; 209th St, 2 Mi N
of US14B; SD324; 219th St, 1 Mi N
of the Moody Co Line; & SD28
Zone Paint/Paint Superstructure,
Girder Splice Repairs, Bearing
Retrofit, and/or Weld Repairs
Brookings
Deuel
0.0 I29N 1.267 2016 1.392
268 NH 0212(162)380 03RN US212 - From Watertown to the
Intersection of Co Road
312/Goodwin Road
PCC SurfacingCodington
Deuel
* 9.3 US212 7.720 2016 9.644
269 IM-P 0012(193) 053A Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealClark
Codington
Deuel
Hamlin
52.2 I29N
I29S
SD20
1.873 2016 2.285
270 P 0012(194) 053T Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealCodington
Deuel
Grant
28.0 SD15
SD20
SD20E
SD20W
0.126 2016 0.154
271 IM 0296(31)151 03R4 I29 - Strs, 0.9 N of SD28 over Peg
Munky Run Ck; 3.5 NW of SD28
over 471 Ave; 6.9 NW of SD28 over
188 St; 6.0 SE of SD22 over 469
Ave; 5.5 SE of SD22 over Hidewood
Ck; 2.5 SE of SD22 over 184 St; 4.0
NW OF SD22 over Stray Horse Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joint ModificationDeuel
Hamlin
0.0 I29N
I29S
1.086 2017 1.194
272 BRF 6308(12) 04ME Structure 2.6E of Brandt, on 188 St.,
over Cobb Creek SN 20-156-220
Structure & Approach GradingDeuel 0.2 0.491 2017 0.614
273 IM-P 0012(195) 055C Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
73.1 I29N
I29S
SD15
SD20
SD20E
SD20W
SD22
SD28
SD324
2.210 2017 2.697
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
80
By County
¥¥
Deuel
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
274 IM 0294(69)121 04NM I-29 Aberdeen Region Interstate Crossroad
Improvements
Brookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Moody
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.222 2018 0.244
275 NH 0212(171)389 03RP US212 - Fm Co Rd 312/Goodwin
Road to W of the S Jct of SD15
PCC SurfacingDeuel 7.4 US212 6.633 2018 8.282
276 NH-P 0012(203) 05L7 Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
84.0 SD10
SD101
SD15
SD22
SD30
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
2.483 2018 3.030
277 NH 0212(172)401 03TL
NH 0212(173)397 04E9
US212 - Fm W of the S Jct of SD15
to the Minn State Line; US212 - Str
1.1 W of the N SD15 Jct Over Caine
Ck
Mill & PCCP Overlay, Pipe Work;
Replace Structure (RCBC) &
Approach Grading
Deuel* 14.8 US212 14.326 2019 18.004
278 PH 0015(76)128 04HL
PH 0028(36)355 04HM
SD15 - Fm SD28 N to Clear Lake;
SD28 - Fm Estelline to SD15
Shoulder Widening, Pipe Work,
Replace Str (RCBC)
Deuel
Hamlin
* 21.3 SD15
SD28
20.889 2019 23.210
279 NH 0014(213)415 05DA
NH 014B(172)419 05DC
P 0022(59)379 05DD
US14E - Str 1.9 E of Volga Over the
Big Sioux River; US14 B - Strs 2.0
W of I29 Interchange Over Six Mile
Ck, 1.6 W of I29 Interchange over
East Branch of Six Mile Ck & 1.4 E
of I 29 Intechange Over Deer Ck;
SD22 - Str 8.7, 9.3 & 11.4 E of SD15
Over Cobb Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal, & Weld Repair
(20-193-160)
Brookings
Deuel
0.0 SD22
US14B
US14E
0.580 2019 0.708
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
81
By County
¥¥
Dewey
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
280 NH-P 0032(25) 053G Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
McPherson
Potter
Walworth
115.7 SD10
SD130
SD1804
SD20
SD271
SD65
US12
US83
3.869 2016 4.721
281 P TAPR(13) 05CE Eagle Butte - Along Airport Rd. / Rte.
16 from Willow St. to Cheyenne
River Health Care Center Entrance.
Shared Use Path ConstructionDewey 0.2 0.143 2016 0.179
282 BRF 6259(06) 03GU Structure 0.5E of White Horse, over
a creek SN 21-313-140
Structure & Approach GradingDewey 0.2 0.491 2017 0.614
283 NH-P 0032(29) 05L3 Various Routes in the Mobridge Area Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
45.3 SD271
US12
US212
1.299 2018 1.585
284 P 0065(17)193 04ER SD65 - Fm Isabel to the Grand River Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkCorson
Dewey
20.5 SD65 5.084 2019 6.349
285 P 0010(119)183 05DH
P 0063( )186 05DN
P 0065(18)199 05DP
SD10 - Str 1.0 E of Pollock Over
Lake Pocasse; SD63 - Str 13 N of
Jct US212 over the Moreau River;
SD65 - Str. 0.4 N of Dewey County
Line Over Firesteel Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal; Epoxy Chip Seal;
Pourable Joint Seal
Campbell
Corson
Dewey
0.0 SD10
SD63
SD65
0.242 2019 0.294
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
82
By County
¥¥
Douglas
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
286 P 6221(17) 02T1 Fm SD44 2W of the E Co. Line, N 6
mi. on 402 Ave to 270 St. (Co. Rd
3-2)
AC OverlayDouglas 6.0 0.516 2016 1.320
(Total = $1.32; STP/Match = $0.63075, Local Funds = $0.68925)
287 P TAPR(10) 04UH Armour - On the east side of Dobson
Ave. from Fourth St. to Seventh St.,
on the east side of Matthews Ave.
from Third St. to Fourth St., and on
the south side of Fourth St. from
Matthews Ave. to Dobson Ave.
Sidewalk ConstructionDouglas 0.3 0.151 2016 0.188
288 NH 0281(111)48 04WF US281 - Fm the W Jct with SD44 to
S of the Jct with SD42
AC ResurfacingAurora
Douglas
10.7 US281 3.325 2018 4.152
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
83
By County
¥¥
Edmunds
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
289 NH 0012(190)212 04W9
NH 0083(83)205 053U
US12 - Fm 2 mi S of Selby through
Bowdle; US83 - Fm US12 to end of
the divided section
Mill & AC Resurfacing; Pipe WorkEdmunds
Walworth
21.3 US12
US12E
US12W
US83N
US83S
6.913 2016 8.634
290 NH-P 0011(91) 053Q Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
95.6 SD10
SD25
SD37
SD45
US12
0.402 2016 0.491
291 P 0032(26) 054F Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Rout and SealCampbell
Edmunds
McPherson
30.5 SD1804
SD47
0.130 2016 0.158
292 NH-P 0011(92) 055A Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
125.9 SD10
SD25
SD27
SD37
SD45
SD47
US281N
US281S
4.164 2017 5.080
293 NH-P 0011(93) 055V Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Edmunds
Faulk
23.3 SD20
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
0.121 2017 0.148
294 P 0253(04)182 03T8 SD253 - Fm Hosmer to SD47 Mill & AC Resurfacing & Pipe WorkEdmunds 8.0 SD253 1.743 2017 2.177
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
84
By County
¥¥
Edmunds
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
295 NH 0012(269)269 04V1
P 0037(148)175 05FJ
US12, US12 E&W - Strs 6.7 East of
Ipswich Over Preachers Run Creek;
0.1 E of the Edmunds/Brown Co
Line Over Snake Creek (2); 0.7
West of US 281 South Over Foot
Creek; SD37 - Strs 6.4 N of US212
Over a branch of Fordham Ck, 7.7 N
of US212 Over Fordham Ck, 2.9 N
of Verdon Over a Ck.
Epoxy Chip SealBrown
Edmunds
Spink
0.0 SD37
US12
US12E
US12W
0.397 2018 0.484
296 NH-P 0011(105) 05KQ Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Walworth
31.9 SD37
US12
US12E
US12W
US83N
US83S
0.145 2018 0.177
297 NH-P 0011(104) 05KX Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealsBrown
Day
Edmunds
Faulk
Marshall
McPherson
103.6 SD20
SD239
SD25
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
US281
2.970 2018 3.625
298 NH 0012(199)263 05EP US12 - Fm Ipswich to Aberdeen AC SurfacingBrown
Edmunds
29.2 US12
US12E
US12W
5.026 2019 6.133
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
85
By County
¥¥
Fall River
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
299 P 0018(181)12 03AC
P 0385(49)36 03AD
US18 - 3 S of US18 & SD89 over a
draw, Over the Cheyenne River at
Edgemont, Over the BNSF RR at the
NE corner of Edgemont, Over Red
Canyon Ck 3 mi NE of Edgemont,
Over a Draw 6 mi NE of Edgemont;
US385 - 0.5 N & 0.8 N of US18W
over Fall River & 1.4 N of US18 W
over a Creek
Epoxy Chip SealFall River 0.0 US18
US385
0.977 2016 1.193
300 NH 0385(53)0 053C US385 - Fm the Nebraska State Line
North 9.5 Miles
Chip SealFall River 12.3 US385
US385N
US385S
0.322 2016 0.393
301 BRO 8024(12) 01DP Structure 2.2E of Edgemont over
Red Canyon Creek
Structure & Approach GradingFall River 0.2 0.633 2016 0.792
302 BRO 8024(14) 02E8 Structure 4E & 1.8N of Edgemont
over abandoned RR line
Structure & Approach GradingFall River 0.2 0.967 2017 1.208
303 P 0043(00) 049U Fm SD471 to Provo W and NW to
Igloo apppx. 2 mi
Grading, Gravel Surfacing, ROW,
Obliteration of Existing Roadway
and Strs.
Fall River 2.0 0.778 2018 0.950
304 NH 0018(201)62 04WL US18 - Fm the S Jct with US385 to
Oglala
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkFall River
Oglala Lakota
25.5 US18 7.374 2019 9.210
305 NH 0018(184)39 03TH US18 - From the Jct. with US385 to
the South East city limits of Hot
Springs
Urban Reconstruction, PCC
Surfacing, Curb & Gutter,
Sidewalk, Roadway Lighting,
Traffic Signals
Fall River* 1.1 US18 11.033 2019 14.536
306 P 0071(03)06 04FV
P 0071(10)0 3570
SD71 - Fm the Nebr State Line to S
of Hat Ck; SD71 - Str 0.5 mi S of
SD471 over a Creek
AC Surfacing & Pipe Work;
Replace Structure (RCBC) &
Approach Grading
Fall River 17.0 SD71 3.069 2019 3.821
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
86
By County
¥¥
Faulk
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
307 BRO 8025(15) 01E0 Structure 1N & 1.1W of Chelsea
over Preachers Run Creek
Structure & Approach GradingFaulk 0.2 0.299 2016 0.373
308 NH-P 0011(64) 02GV SD45 & US212 in the Aberdeen
Area
Minor Joint and Spall RepairFaulk 14.7 SD45
US212
1.088 2016 1.328
309 P 0020(130)295 03TW
P 0037(132)157 03TX
SD20 - Str.s 0.8 S of SD45N Over a
Creek, 3.3 E of the Faulk Co Line
Over Snake Creek, & 4.3 E of the
Faulk Co Line Over Snake Creek;
SD37 - Str. 6 S of US212 Over a
Creek
Scour Protection, Scour Protection
& Column Repair (58-033-060);
Scour Protection
Faulk
Spink
0.0 SD20
SD37
0.283 2017 0.346
310 P 6209(11) 042U From US212 at Faulkton, N 10.4 mi.
on 353 Ave. to SD20 (Co. Hwy 11,
Wecota Road)
Milling, Base Course, Gravel, Pipe,
AC Overlay (0.4 mi. in Faulkton)
Faulk 10.4 1.148 2017 1.400
311 NH-P 0011(93) 055V Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Edmunds
Faulk
23.3 SD20
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
0.121 2017 0.148
312 NH 0212(180)235 056Q US212 - Fm SD47 to the
Potter/Faulk County Line
Crack LevelingFaulk
Potter
9.2 US212 0.230 2017 0.281
313 NH-PH
0212(167)245
03RQ US212 - Fm the Potter/Faulk County
Line to Faulkton; US212, Str 1 W of
Faulkton Over the S Fork of Snake
Ck
Shoulder Widening & Shoulder
Surfacing, Pipe Work; Scour
Protection
Faulk* 20.2 US212 16.004 2018 17.793
314 PH 8025(16) 02UN Various County Roads in Faulk
County
Signing & Delineation, PEFaulk 0.0 1.456 2018 1.456
315 NH-P 0011(104) 05KX Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealsBrown
Day
Edmunds
Faulk
Marshall
McPherson
103.6 SD20
SD239
SD25
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
US281
2.970 2018 3.625
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
87
By County
¥¥
Grant
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
316 P 6266(07) 04VQ From 2S and 1 W of the SE edge of
Marvin, W9 mi. on 149 St., between
464 Ave. and 455 Ave. (Co. Rd 8)
AC OverlayGrant 9.0 1.312 2016 1.900
Total = $1.9: STP/Match '16 '17 = $1.6, SIB = $0.3
317 BRO 8026(24) 00ZE Structure 3W & 1.2S of Albee over
the South Fork of the Yellow Bank
River
Structure & Approach GradingGrant 0.2 0.226 2016 0.284
318 NH 0012(192) 052T Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Joint and Spall RepairBrookings
Grant
Roberts
35.5 US12
US14
3.419 2016 4.172
319 P 0012(194) 053T Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealCodington
Deuel
Grant
28.0 SD15
SD20
SD20E
SD20W
0.126 2016 0.154
320 PS 000S(325) 04CD Sisseton-Milbank crossings from
Milbank to Sisseton
Replace crossbuck signsGrant
Roberts
0.0 0.060 2016 0.060
321 P SRTS(35) 04NT Big Stone City P.E., Non Infrastructure and
Construct New Sidewalk.
Grant 0.0 0.192 2016 0.192
322 NH 0012(176)399 03U2
P 0022(41)352 03U3
US12 - Str 0.6 E of SD109 Over the
Whetstone River Diversion Channel;
SD22 - Str 3.2 E of US81 Over the
Big Sioux River
Fatigue Retrofit, Replace Torn
Diaphragm Lower Chords, & Cover
Plate Repair; Fatigue Retrofit
Grant
Hamlin
0.0 SD22
US12
0.189 2017 0.229
323 BRO 8026(22) 00BQ 1 E & 0.6 S of Albee Over S. Fork of
Yellow Bank River
Structure & Approach GradingGrant 0.2 0.280 2017 0.350
324 BRO 8026(25) 00ZF Structure 4N & 2E of Milbank over
the N. Fork of the Whetstone River
Structure & Approach GradingGrant 0.2 0.338 2017 0.422
325 BRF 6311(08) 01DR Structures 0.5S & 0.6S of Albee over
the S. Fork of the Yellow Bank River
Structure & Approach GradingGrant 0.3 0.260 2017 0.325
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
88
By County
¥¥
Grant
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
326 IM-P 0012(195) 055C Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
73.1 I29N
I29S
SD15
SD20
SD20E
SD20W
SD22
SD28
SD324
2.210 2017 2.697
327 NH-P 0012(196) 055X Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealBrookings
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
25.3 SD10
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
0.112 2017 0.137
328 P 0106(06)334 04V0
P 0010(120)363 05FK
NH 0012(200)399 05FD
P 0020(163)450 05FL
SD106 - 3.2 W of SD127 Over the
Little Minnesota River; SD10 - Str
1.7 E of I29 Over the Little
Minnesota River; US12 - Str 0.6 E of
SD109 Over the Whetsone River Div
Channel; SD20 - Str 4.1 E of SD15
Over a creek
Epoxy Chip Seal; Fiber WrapGrant
Roberts
0.0 SD10
SD106
SD20
US12
0.326 2018 0.397
329 IM 0294(69)121 04NM I-29 Aberdeen Region Interstate Crossroad
Improvements
Brookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Moody
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.222 2018 0.244
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
89
By County
¥¥
Grant
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
330 NH-P 0012(203) 05L7 Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
84.0 SD10
SD101
SD15
SD22
SD30
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
2.483 2018 3.030
331 IM 0299(75)206 04VY I29 - Strs, 0.6 S of the US12, 8 N of
US212, 2 S of Roberts Co Line, 6.2
S of US12 and 2 N of Codington Co
Line
Epoxy Chip SealCodington
Grant
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.725 2019 0.798
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
90
By County
¥¥
Gregory
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
332 BRO 8027(29) 00QR 2 W & 0.1 S of SD44/SD47 Over a
Creek
Structure & Approach GradingGregory 0.2 0.226 2016 0.284
333 NH 0018(197)327 04XV US18 - W of the Gregory/Charles
Mix County Line
Spot GradingGregory 0.0 US18 0.206 2016 0.261
334 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
335 NH-P 0021(158) 054E Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Rout and SealGregory
Hanson
McCook
Miner
53.2 SD25
SD251
SD42
SD47
0.239 2016 0.292
336 BRO 8027(28) 00JY Structure 3.1W & 2S of Jct.
SD44/SD47 over a creek SN
27-019-100
Structure & Approach GradingGregory 0.2 0.216 2016 0.270
337 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
338 NH 0018(187)278 02RC US18 - Through Gregory Extend Existing Lighting 1500 Feet
to the Edge of the City Limits
Gregory 0.6 US18 0.081 2017 0.099
339 BRO 8027(31) 02E9 Structure 1S & 0.1W of Herrick over
a creek
Structure & Approach GradingGregory 0.2 0.257 2018 0.320
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
91
By County
¥¥
Gregory
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
340 NH 0018(188)320 04EA
NH 0046(62)278 04T8
NH 0046(69)288 05JN
NH 0050(121)329 05JP
US18 - Fm US281 E to Pickstown;
SD46 - 1.6 miles east of the US18
Junction at Pickstown; SD46 in
Wagner; SD50 in Wagner
US18 - Mill & AC Resurfacing,
Guardrail, Lighting, & Slide Repair;
SD46 - Slide Repair; SD46 - AC
Overlay; SD50 - AC Overlay
Charles Mix
Gregory
* 12.7 SD46
SD50
US18
4.938 2018 6.170
341 P 0044(191)274 04X2 SD44 - Fm SD47 to the
Platte/Winner Bridge
Mill and AC ResurfacingGregory 16.1 SD44 3.738 2018 4.668
342 NH-P 0021(161) 05L2 Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
McCook
Sanborn
130.3 SD1806
SD25
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
SD44
SD50
US18
US281
US81
3.736 2018 4.560
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
92
By County
¥¥
Haakon
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
343 PP 0063(50)96 05JR SD63 - West Edge of Midland,
189932W, RCP&E
Ugrade Railroad Signals, Surface
Replacement, PE
Haakon 0.0 SD63 0.360 2016 0.400
344 P TAPR(03) 04QF In Philip, on the East Side of Stanley
Ave., from West Pine St. to the
Community Pool Property.
Shared Use Path ConstructionHaakon 0.0 0.043 2016 0.053
345 NH 0012(175)106 03UA
NH 0212(161)135 03UC
P 0063(46)146 03UD
P 0063(45)144 03WC
US12 - Str.s 6.7 E of the Perkins Co
Line Over Hay Ck; US212 - Str.s 0.5
W of Dupree Over Bear Ck; SD63 -
Str 1.7 N of the Haakon Co Line
Over Dupree Ck; SD63 - Str 0.5 S of
the Ziebach/Haakon Co Line Over
Hermaphrodite Ck
Scour ProtectionCorson
Haakon
Ziebach
0.0 SD63
US12
US212
0.488 2017 0.511
346 NH-P 0034(174)115 055K SD34 - Fm the Meade/Ziebach
County Line to Pierre
Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Stanley
Ziebach
41.2 SD34
SD34E
SD34W
1.441 2017 1.758
347 P 0063(47)83 04EJ SD63 - Fm SD248 to US14 in
Midland
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkHaakon
Jackson
13.5 SD63 3.218 2018 4.107
348 NH-P 0031(34) 05L4 Various Routes in the Pierre Area Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Hyde
Jackson
Potter
Stanley
Sully
93.6 SD1804
SD1806
SD34
SD47
SD73
2.685 2018 3.276
349 P 0063(00)142 05DY SD63 - Str 2.1 Miles S of the
Ziebach County Line
Replace RCBC Inlet ApronHaakon 0.0 SD63 0.000 2019 0.056
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
93
By County
¥¥
Hamlin
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
350 IM 0294(66)164 034T I29 - Strs, US212 Interchange; US81
Interchange; 1.7 N of US212
Interchange Over Willow Creek; 2.3
SE of US212 over 458th Ave; At the
Hamlin/Codington Co Line Over
462nd Ave; At the SD22
Interchange; Over RR, 4.8 S of
SD20 Interchange
Epoxy Chip SealsCodington
Hamlin
0.0 I29N
I29S
US81
1.149 2016 1.263
351 BRO 8029(18) 01DT Structure 2N & 1.2 W of Castlewood
over the Big Sioux River
Structure & Approach GradingHamlin 0.2 0.486 2016 0.607
352 P 0028(32)319 02QK SD28 - Fm the south Jct. with SD25
to east of Bryant
Mill & AC Resurfacing, ADA
Upgrades and Drainage
Improvements in Bryant
Clark
Hamlin
9.9 SD28 2.668 2016 3.329
353 IM-P 0012(193) 053A Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealClark
Codington
Deuel
Hamlin
52.2 I29N
I29S
SD20
1.873 2016 2.285
354 NH 0012(176)399 03U2
P 0022(41)352 03U3
US12 - Str 0.6 E of SD109 Over the
Whetstone River Diversion Channel;
SD22 - Str 3.2 E of US81 Over the
Big Sioux River
Fatigue Retrofit, Replace Torn
Diaphragm Lower Chords, & Cover
Plate Repair; Fatigue Retrofit
Grant
Hamlin
0.0 SD22
US12
0.189 2017 0.229
355 IM 0296(31)151 03R4 I29 - Strs, 0.9 N of SD28 over Peg
Munky Run Ck; 3.5 NW of SD28
over 471 Ave; 6.9 NW of SD28 over
188 St; 6.0 SE of SD22 over 469
Ave; 5.5 SE of SD22 over Hidewood
Ck; 2.5 SE of SD22 over 184 St; 4.0
NW OF SD22 over Stray Horse Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joint ModificationDeuel
Hamlin
0.0 I29N
I29S
1.086 2017 1.194
356 BRF 6307(09) 01KL Structure 1.S of Castlewood over the
Big Sioux River
Structure & Approach GradingHamlin 0.2 1.220 2017 1.525
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
94
By County
¥¥
Hamlin
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
357 IM-P 0012(195) 055C Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
73.1 I29N
I29S
SD15
SD20
SD20E
SD20W
SD22
SD28
SD324
2.210 2017 2.697
358 NH-P 0012(196) 055X Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealBrookings
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
25.3 SD10
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
0.112 2017 0.137
359 BRO 8029(23) 03GX Structure 1.1N & 4E of Castlewood,
on 463 Ave., over a creek SN
29-270-039
Structure & Approach GradingHamlin 0.2 0.248 2018 0.310
360 NH-P 0013(41) 05KR Various Routes in the Huron Area Rout and SealClark
Hamlin
Spink
21.0 SD20
SD25
SD28
US212
US281
0.086 2018 0.105
361 P 0012(204) 05KV Various Locations in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealCodington
Hamlin
16.7 SD20
SD28
0.069 2018 0.084
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
95
By County
¥¥
Hamlin
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
362 NH-P 0012(203) 05L7 Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
84.0 SD10
SD101
SD15
SD22
SD30
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
2.483 2018 3.030
363 PH 0015(76)128 04HL
PH 0028(36)355 04HM
SD15 - Fm SD28 N to Clear Lake;
SD28 - Fm Estelline to SD15
Shoulder Widening, Pipe Work,
Replace Str (RCBC)
Deuel
Hamlin
* 21.3 SD15
SD28
20.889 2019 23.210
364 P 0028(38)341 05EV SD28 - Fm the N Jct of US81 to the
E City Limits of Estelline
Mill & AC Resurfacing & Pipe WorkHamlin 13.1 SD28 2.425 2019 2.961
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
96
By County
¥¥
Hand
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
365 PS 0045(51)111 04CK SD45 - In Miller, crossing 189756B,
RCP&E
Rehabilitation of crossing surface
and sidewalk for pedestrians
Hand 0.0 SD45 0.155 2016 0.172
366 NH-P 0013(36) 055F Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealBuffalo
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
* 139.4 SD25
SD26
SD28
SD34
SD45
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
4.801 2017 5.860
367 NH-P 0013(39) 05KL Various Routes in the Huron Area;
Various Routes in the Huron Area
Rout and Seal; Rout and SealBeadle
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
66.9 SD45
US14
US281
0.275 2017 0.335
368 BRO 8030(12) 04M7 Structure 5E & 18.7S of Miller, on
365 Ave., over a creek SN
30-210-447
Structure & Approach GradingHand 0.2 0.227 2018 0.284
369 P 0045(56)88 05EY SD45 - Fm S of the Hand/Buffalo
County Line to S of Miller
AC ResurfacingBuffalo
Hand
13.1 SD45 3.772 2018 4.602
370 NH-P 0013(40) 05L1 Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealsBeadle
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
151.4 SD20
SD25
SD26
SD37
SD45
SD47
US14
US212
US281
4.334 2018 5.289
371 P 0026(03)250 04FK SD26 - 2.8 mi W of SD45 Over
Shaefer Ck
Replace Structure (Bridge) and
Approach Grading
Hand 0.0 SD26 1.398 2019 1.706
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
97
By County
¥¥
Hanson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
372 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
373 NH-P 0021(158) 054E Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Rout and SealGregory
Hanson
McCook
Miner
53.2 SD25
SD251
SD42
SD47
0.239 2016 0.292
374 P 0038(44)300 0556 SD38 - Fm I90 Loop to SD38P in
Mitchell
Joint, Spall and Shoulder RepairDavison
Hanson
3.6 SD38 0.274 2017 0.334
375 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
376 P 0042(58)311 03AN SD42 - 7.5 E of the Davison Co Line
over the James River
Replace Structure (Bridge) &
Approach Grading
Hanson 0.0 SD42 3.843 2018 4.927
377 IM 0906(71)289 04DG I90 - Strs, SD45S Interchange; SD25
Interchange, 5.5 E of SD50
Interchange Over 356 Ave; 6.0 E of
the Mt Vernon Interchange over I90
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joint
Modification, Abutment, Column &
Bent Cap Repair
Brule
Davison
Hanson
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.467 2018 0.514
378 IM 0020(155) 04XN Mitchell Region on I90 Scour ProtectionHanson
McCook
Minnehaha
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.970 2018 1.067
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
98
By County
¥¥
Hanson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
379 NH-P 0021(161) 05L2 Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
McCook
Sanborn
130.3 SD1806
SD25
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
SD44
SD50
US18
US281
US81
3.736 2018 4.560
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
99
By County
¥¥
Harding
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
380 NH-P 0042(64) 054C Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Rout and SealHarding 21.1 SD20
US85
0.091 2016 0.111
381 NH 0085(83)139 03TU
P 0020(142)24 04FG
US85 - Str.s 9.7 S of the ND State
Line Over Big Nasty Ck, 2.9 S of the
ND State Line Over Crooked Ck,
13.6 NE of Buffalo Over Bull Ck;
SD20 - 0.9 & 3.5W of Buffalo Over
Rush Ck & Brush Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal, Column Repair,
Berm Repair, Deck Overlay,
Approach Pavement, Approach
Guardrail, Replace Bridge Rail,
Joints
Harding 0.0 SD20
US85
0.755 2017 0.922
382 P 0020(129)103 03TR
NH 0085(82)121 03TT
US 85 - Str.s 2.9 S of SD20E Over
Buffalo Ck, 0.2 S of SD20W Over S
Fork of the Grand River, 3.6 N of
Buffalo Over Sheep Ck, & 9.7 S of
the ND State Line Over Big Nasty
Ck.; SD20 - Str 4.2 E of the Montana
State Line Over the Little Missouri
River
Scour ProtectionHarding 0.0 SD20
US85
0.481 2017 0.586
383 BRO 8032(05) 01WF Structure 0.4S of Ralph over Big
Nasty Creek
Structure & Approach GradingHarding 0.2 0.697 2017 0.871
384 NH-P 0042(61) 055E Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Chip SealButte
Harding
Meade
Perkins
71.9 SD20
SD79
US85
2.520 2017 3.074
385 NH 0085(92)112 056C US85 - Fm 1.6 Miles N of the North
Fork of the Moreau River to
Tipperary Street in Buffalo
Rout and SealHarding 12.6 US85 0.056 2017 0.069
386 NH-P 0042(00) 05KJ US85 & SD20 through Buffalo Curb Ramp UpgradesHarding 0.5 SD20
US85
0.000 2017 0.208
387 NH 0085(91)78 04WE US85 - Fm S of the Jct with SD168
to N of the Jct with SD168;
US85-Through Buffalo
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkButte
Harding
* 21.3 US85 8.169 2018 10.197
388 NH 0042(67) 05KY Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Chip SealsHarding
Meade
59.4 SD34
SD73
US85
1.703 2018 2.079
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
100
By County
¥¥
Hughes
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
389 NH 0014(217)229 05H2 US14 - From Sioux Ave to SD1804
in Pierre
Chip SealHughes 1.9 US14
US14E
US14W
0.050 2016 0.061
390 P 6395(04) 03QJ Structure located 4.6 N of SD1804
on Grey Goose Road (Co. Rd 153)
Structure & Approach GradingHughes 0.0 0.246 2016 0.300
391 P 0034(180)245 05KF SD34 from the Hughes/Hyde County
Line to the JCT of SD47 North
Crack LevelingHughes
Hyde
11.6 SD34 0.122 2016 0.150
392 NH-P 0034(174)115 055K SD34 - Fm the Meade/Ziebach
County Line to Pierre
Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Stanley
Ziebach
41.2 SD34
SD34E
SD34W
1.441 2017 1.758
393 P 0034(175)227 056F SD34 - Fm the Hughes/Hyde County
Line West to the JCT of SD47 North
Rout and SealHughes
Hyde
29.7 SD34 0.129 2017 0.157
394 PH 0014(218)246 05JJ Junction of US83 and US14 Intersection LightingHughes 0.0 US14
US83
0.177 2017 0.177
395 NH 0014(00)228 03WM US14 - Missouri River Bridge at
Pierre
Preliminary EngineeringHughes* 0.0 US14 0.000 2018 0.053
396 BRF 6235(05) 03H2 Structure 3.3W & 11.2S of Harrold,
on 318 Ave., over a creek SN
33-380-125
Structure & Approach GradingHughes 0.2 0.159 2018 0.200
397 NH-P 0031(34) 05L4 Various Routes in the Pierre Area Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Hyde
Jackson
Potter
Stanley
Sully
93.6 SD1804
SD1806
SD34
SD47
SD73
2.685 2018 3.276
398 NH 0031(36) 05LG Various Routes in the Pierre Area Joint and Spall RepairHughes
Sully
27.0 US83 2.594 2018 3.164
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
101
By County
¥¥
Hutchinson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
399 NH-P 0023(45) 053L Various Locations in the Yankton
Area
Chip SealBon Homme
Hutchinson
Yankton
21.3 SD37P
SD44
SD52
0.767 2016 0.936
400 PP 8034(32) 05JT Dakota St (Co. Rd. 287) West Edge
of Tripp, 382347M, BNSF
Install Railroad Signals & Crossing
Surface Improvements
Hutchinson 0.0 0.360 2016 0.400
401 NH-P 0023(47) 055U Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Charles Mix
Hutchinson
Turner
Union
58.6 SD11
SD37
SD37P
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
SD50W
2.051 2017 2.502
402 NH-P 0023(48) 056K Various Routes in the Yankton Area Rout and SealBon Homme
Clay
Hutchinson
Yankton
48.7 SD314
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
0.201 2017 0.246
403 BRF 6197(02) 04VJ Structure 8E & 2.6S of Parkston
over North Branch of Dry Creek SN
34-140-096 (27760 418 Ave.)
Structure & Approach GradingHutchinson 0.2 0.260 2018 0.325
404 NH 0081(88)15 023Z
PH 0081(107)8 05F7
US81 - Fm SD46 to N of Freeman;
US81 - Intersection with 304th St
and 303rd St
Crack & Seat & AC Overlay;
Construct Left and Right turn
lanes; Crack & Seat and AC
Overlay
Hutchinson
Yankton
19.6 US81 8.683 2018 10.772
405 NH 0081(102)34 02QA US81 – Fm 279th Street to 278th
Street in Freeman
Roadway LightingHutchinson 1.1 US81 0.138 2018 0.169
406 NH 0018(179)402 036L US18 - Fm US81 to SD19 Grading, Str. (Bridge) & Interim
Surfacing
Hutchinson
Turner
* 17.0 US18 17.928 2018 22.865
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
102
By County
¥¥
Hutchinson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
407 NH-P 0023(49) 05L9 Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Clay
Hutchinson
Yankton
68.0 SD19
SD314
SD37
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
US18
1.949 2018 2.379
408 P 0018(185)402 036W US18 - Fm US81 to SD19; US18 -
Fm SD19 to I29
AC Surfacing; Mill & AC
Resurfacing
Hutchinson
Lincoln
Turner
* 31.6 US18 9.626 2019 12.022
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
103
By County
¥¥
Hyde
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
409 NH-P 0013(35) 054D Various Locations in the Huron Area Rout and SealBuffalo
Clark
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
96.0 SD25
SD28
SD34
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
0.388 2016 0.473
410 P 0034(180)245 05KF SD34 from the Hughes/Hyde County
Line to the JCT of SD47 North
Crack LevelingHughes
Hyde
11.6 SD34 0.122 2016 0.150
411 P 0034(164)257 040A SD34 - From the N Jct with SD47 to
the Jct with SD50
Pipe WorkBuffalo
Hyde
17.6 SD34 2.067 2017 2.948
412 NH-P 0013(36) 055F Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealBuffalo
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
* 139.4 SD25
SD26
SD28
SD34
SD45
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
4.801 2017 5.860
413 P 0034(175)227 056F SD34 - Fm the Hughes/Hyde County
Line West to the JCT of SD47 North
Rout and SealHughes
Hyde
29.7 SD34 0.129 2017 0.157
414 NH-P 0013(39) 05KL Various Routes in the Huron Area;
Various Routes in the Huron Area
Rout and Seal; Rout and SealBeadle
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
66.9 SD45
US14
US281
0.275 2017 0.335
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
104
By County
¥¥
Hyde
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
415 NH-P 0013(40) 05L1 Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealsBeadle
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
151.4 SD20
SD25
SD26
SD37
SD45
SD47
US14
US212
US281
4.334 2018 5.289
416 NH-P 0031(34) 05L4 Various Routes in the Pierre Area Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Hyde
Jackson
Potter
Stanley
Sully
93.6 SD1804
SD1806
SD34
SD47
SD73
2.685 2018 3.276
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
105
By County
¥¥
Jackson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
417 IM 0903(97)172 035G I90 - Strs, 3.0 Mi E of Exit 201
(Draper) Over 282 Ave; Over County
Rd, Exit 201 (Draper)
Epoxy Chip SealJackson
Jones
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.386 2016 0.423
418 IM 0903(102)112 03W0
NH 0014(216)112 05EE
I90 - WBL, Fm US14 to the E Jct.
with SD 240; US14 - Fm I-90, E 2 mi
Mill & AC ResurfacingJackson
Pennington
* 21.5 I90W
US14E
US14W
5.899 2016 6.737
419 IM 0903(101)153 03W4 I90 - EBL, Fm E of Exit 152
(Kadoka) to East of Exit 163
(Belvidere)
Remove & Replace PCC
Surfacing, Edge Drains, Inslope
Flattening, Pipe Work
Jackson* 10.6 I90E 16.462 2016 18.893
420 IM-NH 0033(23) 053K Various Locations in the Winner
Area
Chip SealBennett
Jackson
46.0 I90E
I90W
SD73
1.876 2016 2.289
421 P 0063(49)54 054W SD63 - Fm 14.8 Mi S of the
Mellette/Jackson County Line to
Belvidere
Gravel ResurfacingJackson
Mellette
20.2 SD63 1.714 2016 2.091
422 IM 0903(77)131 3949 I90 - Strs, Exit 131 (Cactus Flat), 1 E
of Exit 131 (Cactus Flat), 7.5 E of
Exit 212 (US83 N), Exit 226 (US183
Presho) & Exit 251 (SD47 S)
Zone PaintingJackson
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.652 2018 0.716
423 IM 0903(104)153 03W6
P 0073(71)78 05FE
I90 - WBL, Fm E of Exit 152 at
Kadoka to East of Exit 163 at
Belvidere; SD73 - Fm SD248 N 0.3
Mi
Remove & Replace PCC
Surfacing, Edge Drains, Inslope
Flattening, Pipe Work, Extend
Culvert; AC Resurfacing
Jackson* 10.8 I90W
SD73
17.212 2018 19.771
424 P 0063(47)83 04EJ SD63 - Fm SD248 to US14 in
Midland
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkHaakon
Jackson
13.5 SD63 3.218 2018 4.107
425 NH-P 0031(34) 05L4 Various Routes in the Pierre Area Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Hyde
Jackson
Potter
Stanley
Sully
93.6 SD1804
SD1806
SD34
SD47
SD73
2.685 2018 3.276
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
106
By County
¥¥
Jackson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
426 NH-P 0033(25) 05L8 Various Routes in the Winner Area Chip SealBennett
Jackson
Tripp
31.9 SD44
SD73
US18
US18E
US18W
0.755 2018 0.920
427 IM 0903(105)131 04NJ I-90 - Pierre Region Crossroad ImprovementsJackson
Jones
Lyman
119.8 I90E
I90W
0.985 2019 1.082
428 IM 0903(110)132 04W1 I90 - Strs, Over Big Buffalo Crk, 1.0
E of the SD240S Interchange; Over
Fairview Rd and Over Co Rd, 7.0 W
and 4.0 W of the SD73N
Interchange; SD73N Exit; Over Co
Rd, 2.2 E of the US83S Interchange;
Over Co Rd, 4.7 W & 1.3 E of the
US83N Interchange
Epoxy Chip SealJackson
Jones
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.912 2019 1.003
429 IM 0903(111)182 05D5 I90 - Strs 2.3 E of the SD63 N
Interchange; US83 S Interchange;
3.6 E of the US83 N Interchange
Deck OverlayJackson
Jones
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.463 2019 0.510
430 P 0044(183)119 03T0 SD44 - Fm SD377 at Interior to W of
Wanblee
Mill & AC ResurfacingJackson 14.5 SD44 2.648 2019 3.307
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
107
By County
¥¥
Jerauld
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
431 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
432 P 0034(171)312 04VU SD34 - Wessington Springs Landslide RepairJerauld 0.0 SD34 0.761 2018 0.974
433 NH 0281(112)96 04WN US281 - From SD34 to the
Jerauld/Beadle County Line
AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkJerauld 9.0 US281 2.557 2019 3.193
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
108
By County
¥¥
Jones
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
434 IM 0903(97)172 035G I90 - Strs, 3.0 Mi E of Exit 201
(Draper) Over 282 Ave; Over County
Rd, Exit 201 (Draper)
Epoxy Chip SealJackson
Jones
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.386 2016 0.423
435 IM 0904(57)189 035E
NH 0083(85)87 05H6
I 90 - WBL Fm 3 mi W of Murdo to 3
mi W of Draper; US83 - Fm SD53 to
SD248
I90 - PCC Surfacing; US83 - PCC
Surfacing, AC Surfacing of
Shoulders, Edge Drains
Jones
Lyman
* 9.4 I90W
US83
8.411 2016 9.512
436 P TAPR(06) 04UD Murdo - On the west side of
Cleveland Ave. from 5th St. to 4th
St., on the north side of 4th St. from
Cleveland Ave. to Jackson Ave., on
the west side of Jackson from 5th St.
to 4th St. and on the east side of
Jackson from 4th St. to the south
side of the High School drive and
south along the drive to the school.
Sidewalk ConstructionJones 0.3 0.153 2016 0.187
437 IM 0904(50)189 00GL I90 - EBL Fm 3 Mi W of Exit 192
(Murdo) to 3 Mi W of Exit 201
(Draper)
PCC SurfacingJones* 8.4 I90E 8.072 2017 9.084
438 P 0083(74)56 036E US83 - Fm N. of the Mellette/Jones
Co. Line to south of Murdo
Grading, Replace Structure
(Bridge) Over Horse Creek, Interim
Surfacing
Jones* 11.4 US83 14.693 2017 18.057
439 IM 0904(60)192 04DK I90 - Strs, Over County Rd, 2.0 W of
Draper Intch; Over Sundance Road
3.6 E of the 83 N Intch; Over County
Rd, 7.5 E of US83N Intch; Over
County Rd, W Presho Intch; Over
County Rd, 6.0 E of US183 Intch;
Over County Rd, 4.0 W of Reliance
Intch
Epoxy Chip SealJones
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.724 2018 0.796
440 NH 0083(79)45 04E7 US83 - Fm North of White River to N
of the Mellette/Jones Co Line
Grading, Interim Surfacing,
Structure Replacement over the
White & Little White River
Jones
Mellette
* 11.0 US83 18.017 2018 22.239
441 IM 0903(105)131 04NJ I-90 - Pierre Region Crossroad ImprovementsJackson
Jones
Lyman
119.8 I90E
I90W
0.985 2019 1.082
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
109
By County
¥¥
Jones
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
442 IM 0903(110)132 04W1 I90 - Strs, Over Big Buffalo Crk, 1.0
E of the SD240S Interchange; Over
Fairview Rd and Over Co Rd, 7.0 W
and 4.0 W of the SD73N
Interchange; SD73N Exit; Over Co
Rd, 2.2 E of the US83S Interchange;
Over Co Rd, 4.7 W & 1.3 E of the
US83N Interchange
Epoxy Chip SealJackson
Jones
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.912 2019 1.003
443 IM 0903(111)182 05D5 I90 - Strs 2.3 E of the SD63 N
Interchange; US83 S Interchange;
3.6 E of the US83 N Interchange
Deck OverlayJackson
Jones
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.463 2019 0.510
444 NH 0083(80)44 04E8 US83 - From White River to S of
Murdo
AC Surfacing, ADA UpgradesJones
Mellette
* 23.3 US83 14.663 2019 17.893
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
110
By County
¥¥
Kingsbury
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
445 NH 0081(100)107 04DX US81 - Fm the South Junction of
US14, South 9 miles
Shoulder Improvement & Pipe
Work
Brookings
Kingsbury
6.8 US81 0.986 2016 1.232
446 NH-P 0013(33) 052U Various Routes in the Huron Area Joint and Spall RepairKingsbury
Miner
21.2 SD25
SD34
US14
US14E
US14W
US81
1.570 2016 1.916
447 NH-P 0013(35) 054D Various Locations in the Huron Area Rout and SealBuffalo
Clark
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
96.0 SD25
SD28
SD34
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
0.388 2016 0.473
448 NH 0281(102)159 03UN
NH 0014(190)381 03UP
US281 - Str 5.8 N of US212 Over
Snake Ck; US14 - Str 3.1 E of SD25
Over a creek
Scour ProtectionKingsbury
Spink
0.0 US14
US281
0.228 2017 0.278
449 NH 0014(199)363 02Q9 US14 - Through The City Limits of
Iroquois
Roadway LightingBeadle
Kingsbury
0.5 US14 0.067 2017 0.084
450 NH-P 0013(36) 055F Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealBuffalo
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
* 139.4 SD25
SD26
SD28
SD34
SD45
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
4.801 2017 5.860
451 PH 8039(16) 02UM Various County Roads in Kingsbury
County
Signing & Delineation, PEKingsbury 0.0 1.712 2017 1.712
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
111
By County
¥¥
Kingsbury
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
452 NH-P 0013(39) 05KL Various Routes in the Huron Area;
Various Routes in the Huron Area
Rout and Seal; Rout and SealBeadle
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
66.9 SD45
US14
US281
0.275 2017 0.335
453 NH 0014(00)353 03VM
P 0025(00)114 03VL
US14 - In Cavour, Volga, DeSmet,
Arlington and Lake Preston; SD25 -
In DeSmet
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades ; ADA
Curb Ramp Upgrades
Beadle
Brookings
Kingsbury
6.2 SD25
US14
0.000 2018 0.565
454 NH-P 0013(40) 05L1 Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealsBeadle
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
151.4 SD20
SD25
SD26
SD37
SD45
SD47
US14
US212
US281
4.334 2018 5.289
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
112
By County
¥¥
Lake
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
455 NH 0034(160)386 02R6 SD34 - Fm the N US81 Jct to
Washington Ave. in Madison
Urban Grading, Storm Sewer, Curb
& Gutter, Sidewalk, Traffic Signals,
Roadway Lighting, PCC Surfacing
Lake* 1.0 SD34 5.510 2016 7.047
456 BRO 8040(15) 00ZB Structure 1.9E & 1N of Rutland over
Battle Creek SN 40-219-060
Structure & Approach GradingLake 0.2 0.248 2016 0.310
457 P SRTS(41) 04P0 Madison P.E., Non Infrastructure and
Upgrade Signage to MUTCD
Standards
Lake 0.0 0.038 2016 0.038
458 PH 8040(17) 02MW Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Lake County
Signing & DelineationLake 0.0 1.260 2016 1.260
459 NH-P 0022(54) 055Q Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area.
Chip SealLake
Turner
15.0 SD19
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
0.640 2017 0.780
460 P 0022(55) 056J Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Rout and SealLake
Lincoln
Minnehaha
25.9 SD11
SD19
0.110 2017 0.134
461 BRO 8040(18) 02EF Structure at 111 Garfield Ave. in
Madison over Park Creek (City
owned)
Structure & Approach GradingLake 0.2 0.227 2018 0.284
462 BRF 6304(02) 02EG Structure at 509 Center St. E in
Madison over Madison Creek (City
owned)
Structure & Approach GradingLake 0.2 0.248 2018 0.310
463 NH-P 0022(60) 05L6 Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Chip SealLake
Lincoln
Miner
Minnehaha
Turner
48.0 SD11
SD19
SD34
SD44
1.362 2018 1.662
464 NH 0022(61) 05LN Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Joint and SpallLake
Moody
10.3 SD34 0.984 2018 1.200
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
113
By County
¥¥
Lake
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
465 NH 0034(163)387 03TC SD34 - From the Washington
Ave/2nd St NE Intersection South to
the start of the Divided Highway in
Madison
Urban Grading, Storm Sewer, Curb
& Gutter, Sidewalk, Roadway
Lighting, ADA, PCC Surfacing
Lake 1.0 SD34 7.379 2019 9.424
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
114
By County
¥¥
Lawrence
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
466 IM 0901(162)14 020U
P 014A(11)8 0217
I90 - Exit 14 (US14A) Spearfish;
US14A (27th Street) - Fm I-90 West
Reconstruct Interchange,
Reconfigure Ramps, ROW
Incidental and Acquisition and
US14A Service Road On the South
Side of Interchange.
Lawrence* 1.7 I90E
I90W
US14A
22.146 2016 26.130
467 IM 0901(171)18 02PP I90 - Strs, 1.0 SE of the SD34N Exit
Over Whitewood Creek; 1.0 E of the
US85 S Exit Over Polo Creek (2);
0.7 E of the US85S Exit over St.
Onge Road; 0.8 W of the SD34N
Exit Over the RCP&E RR
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joint
Modification, End Block &
Approach Slab Repair
Lawrence 0.0 I90E
I90W
0.685 2016 0.754
468 IM 0901(182)23 02Q0
IM 0902(160)67 034L
I90 - Exit 67 (Liberty Blvd.); I90 - Exit
23 (Whitewood)
Partial Interchange LightingLawrence
Pennington
1.3 I90E 0.289 2016 0.321
469 IM 0901(186)0 04DA I90 - EBL/WBL, Fm the Wyoming
Border to West of Exit 10
Crack Seat & AC Surfacing, Pipe
Work
Lawrence 9.8 I90E
I90W
13.450 2016 14.785
470 P 014A(13)11 03RV US14A - From Spearfish to Savoy Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkLawrence 12.0 US14A 2.497 2016 3.118
471 NH-P 0041(151) 054G Various Locations in the Rapid City
Area
Rout and SealLawrence
Pennington
15.6 SD44
SD44E
SD44W
US85
0.069 2016 0.085
472 P TAPR(12) 05CD Whitewood - Along Laurel St. from
Meade St. to Custer St.
Sidewalk ConstructionLawrence 0.1 0.150 2016 0.183
473 P TAPR(07) 04UE Whitewood - On the west side of
Laurel St. from Hooker St. to Meade
St., including the northwest quadrant
of the Meade and Laurel Sts.
Intersection.
Sidewalk ConstructionLawrence 0.1 0.135 2016 0.165
474 IM 0901(179)9 03R9 I90 - Strs, WB On Ramp over
Spearfish Crk, 0.3 W of US85N
Intch; Over False Bottom Crk, 1.0 E
of US14A Intch, 0.8 W of SD34 N
Interchange Over RR
Scour Protection, Berm RepairLawrence 0.0 I90E
I90W
0.278 2017 0.306
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
115
By County
¥¥
Lawrence
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
475 BRO 8041(17) 02E6 Structure 0.9E of Jct. US85S on I90
Service Road (Alcorn Ridge Road)
over Polo Creek (Structure owned
by City of Spearfish)
Structure & Approach GradingLawrence 0.2 0.464 2017 0.581
476 NH 0085(84)36 03U6
NH 0212(164)33 03U7
NH 0079(70)127 03U8
US85 - Str.s 2 N of Belle Fourche
Over Crow Creek, 10.8 N of Belle
Fourche Over Owl Ck,.6 NE of
US212 over Indian Ck & 0.3 S of I90
Over Miller Ck; US212 - Str.s 1.5 NE
of Newell Over Dry Creek & 5.7 NE
of Newell Over Willow Ck; SD79 -
Strs 2 N of the Meade Co Line Over
the Belle Fourche River & 10 N of
Newell/ E Jct of US212 Over S
Willow Creek
Scour Protection and/or Column
Repair
Butte
Lawrence
0.0 SD79
US212
US85
US85S
0.692 2018 0.845
477 NH 014A(14)38 04FX US14A - 2 mi N of US85 over
Deadwood Ck
Replace Structure (RCBC) &
Approach Grading
Lawrence 0.0 US14A 0.471 2018 0.575
478 NH 0085(88)16 04FY US85; US85N&S - 0.2 mi W of
Cheyenne Crossing over Spearfish
Ck; 1 mi S of the I90 Interchange
over Polo Ck
Epoxy Chip Seal; Deck Overlay,
Replace Bridge Rail, Aproach Rail
and Approach Pavement
Lawrence 0.0 US85
US85N
US85S
0.402 2018 0.490
479 NH 014A(16)42 04TA US14A - Just East of the junction
with US85 N of Deadwood
Slide Repair & Retaining WallLawrence 0.0 US14A 0.444 2018 0.541
480 P 0385(54)115 04WG US385 - From N of Nemo Road to
US85
Mill & AC ResurfacingLawrence 6.5 US385 2.310 2018 2.873
481 NH 014A(15)41 04FA US14A - Fm Railroad Ave to E of the
Jct. of US85 in Deadwood
Mill & AC Resurfacing, ADA,
Traffic Signals, Joint Repair, Spall
Repair
Lawrence* 1.4 US14A 2.027 2018 2.598
482 NH-P 0040(238) 05KU Various Routes in the Rapid City
Region
Rout and SealCuster
Lawrence
Pennington
24.2 SD40
US14A
US14E
US14W
0.099 2018 0.121
483 BRF 6545(02) 05LW Structure 1E of Whitewood on I90
Service Road over Whitewood Creek
SN 41-214-100
Structure & Approach GradingLawrence 0.2 0.900 2018 1.125
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
116
By County
¥¥
Lawrence
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
484 PH 014A(19)31 04XJ US14A - 2 E of US85 (Cheyenne
Crossing)
Grading and AC SurfacingLawrence 0.8 US14A 2.062 2019 2.291
485 PH 8041(19) 04L7 Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Lawrence County
Signing & DelineationLawrence 0.0 0.723 2019 0.723
486 P 0034(179)10 05EW SD34 - Fm US85 to I90 Mill & AC ResurfacingButte
Lawrence
17.2 SD34 4.574 2019 5.582
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
117
By County
¥¥
Lincoln
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
487 IM 0293(96)73 01QS
IM 2292(90)0 020Q
I29 - Fm N of Exit 73 (Tea) to 57th
Street & I229 - Fm I29 to W of Exit 1
(Louise Ave) & Tea Interchange Str.
Grading, Strs, PCC Surfacing,
Lighting & Utilities
Lincoln
Minnehaha
* 5.0 I229N
I229S
I29N
I29S
25.421 2016 29.382
488 IM 0291(122)0 02PT I29 - Strs, N Sioux City Interchange
Over River Street; Over the Big
Sioux River @ the Iowa Border; I29P
over I29, 1.9 N of N Sioux City Intch;
SD50 over I29; 0.4 S of the SD48
Intch Over a Creek; 6.0 N of the
SD46 Intch Over I29
Deck Overlay, Approach Slabs and
Approach Guardrail Epoxy Chip
Seal, Abutment & Column Repr &
Joint Modification, Approach
Repairs
Lincoln
Union
0.0 I29N
I29S
2.073 2016 2.279
489 BRO 8042(09) 6093 8 S & 1.6 E of Lennox Over Snake
Creek
Structure & Approach GradingLincoln 0.2 0.226 2016 0.284
490 IM-P 0023(44) 052V Various Routes in the Yankton Area Joint and Spall RepairClay
Lincoln
Union
Yankton
15.4 I29N
I29S
SD19
SD50
SD50EL
SD50L
SD50WL
SD52
1.651 2016 2.016
491 PH 8042(44) 044F Various County, City , & Township
Roads in Lincoln County
Signing & Delineation, PELincoln 0.0 1.593 2016 1.593
492 PH 0020(139) 04GP Mitchell Region Intersection ImprovementsClay
Lincoln
McCook
Minnehaha
Moody
Turner
1.5 SD11
SD115
SD19
SD34
SD42
SD44
US81
0.459 2016 0.510
493 P 0017(08)42 028V SD17 - Fm the Jct. with SD44 to the
north city limits in Lennox
Grading, Curb & Gutter, Lighting &
AC Surfacing
Lincoln 1.2 SD17 3.788 2016 4.842
494 BRO 8042(31) 5552 9.7 S & 3.0 E of Lennox Over a
Creek
PE, Structure & Approach GradingLincoln 0.2 0.153 2016 0.192
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
118
By County
¥¥
Lincoln
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
495 P 0ENH(219) 04C0 Along SD Highway 44 in Lennox PE, Shared Use Path ConstructionLincoln 1.0 0.464 2016 0.566
496 P TAPU(01) 04Q8 In Harrisburg, on the North Side of
Willow St./CR110, from Honeysuckle
Dr. to Prairie St.
Shared Use Path ConstructionLincoln 1.4 0.281 2016 0.343
497 P TAPU(11) 05C7 Harrisburg - Along Willow Street
from Honeysuckle Drive to SD115
Shared Use Path ConstructionLincoln 0.6 0.182 2016 0.222
498 IM 0020(127) 035D Mitchell Region on I29 Scour ProtectionLincoln
Moody
0.0 I29N
I29S
1.015 2017 1.116
499 BRF 6591(06) 03C9 Structure 0.2S & 3W of Harrisburg
over Nine Mile Creek (Louise Ave.
Co. Rd 117) SN 42-080-052
Structure & Approach GradingLincoln 0.0 0.248 2017 0.309
500 BRF 6377(06) 03H9 Structure 4W & 2.8S of Fairview, on
482 Ave., over a creek SN
42-180-223
Structure & Approach GradingLincoln 0.2 0.243 2017 0.305
501 NH 0115(48)76 0214
P TAPU(08) 04U9
SD115 - Fm the Harrisburg corner
(273rd Street) to 85th St. in Sioux
Falls.; Harrisburg - Shared Use Path
on the east side of Minnesota
Ave./Highway 115, a portion from
Willow Street to 85th Street.
Reconstruct to 4 lane segment,
PCC Surfacing; Shared Use Path
Construction
Lincoln* 6.4 SD115
SD115N
SD115S
18.535 2017 23.608
502 P 0022(55) 056J Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Rout and SealLake
Lincoln
Minnehaha
25.9 SD11
SD19
0.110 2017 0.134
503 PH 0046(65)373 04HF Jct SD11/SD46 Intersection ImprovementsLincoln
Union
0.4 SD11
SD46
1.371 2017 1.523
504 NH-PH
0018(180)420
036A US18 - From SD19 to I29 Shoulder Widening, Str
Replacement (RCBC), Pipe Work,
Berm Repair & Scour Protection
Lincoln
Turner
* 14.5 US18 10.901 2018 10.998
505 IM 2292(93)0 032L Solberg/Tallgrass Overpass Approach Slabs to Structure and
AC Surfacing
Lincoln 0.0 I229N
I229S
0.483 2018 0.531
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
119
By County
¥¥
Lincoln
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
506 IM 0292(77)47 04D8 I29 - NBL & SBL, Fm N of Exit 47
(Beresford) to S of Exit 62 (Canton)
Mill & AC Resurfacing; Pipe WorkLincoln* 14.1 I29N
I29S
6.731 2018 7.573
507 IM 0292(76)56 04DH
IM 0293(104)96 04DJ
I29 - Str, Over I29, 3.0 S of US18W
Intch; I29 NB - Str, Over RR, 0.6 N
of SD44 Intch; I29 - Str, County Rd
over I29, 2.0 S of SD115 Intch
Deck Overlay, Joint Modification,
Joint Replacement (Approach
Slabs); Deck Overlay, Joint
Replacement and Approaches
Lincoln
Minnehaha
0.0 I29N 0.721 2018 0.791
508 P 1360(01) 03YF W 85th St. (270th St.) from
Sundowner Ave., E 1 mi. to
Tallgrass Ave. in Sioux Falls
ROWLincoln* 1.0 0.901 2018 1.100
509 BRF 6591(07) 05LV Structure 1.5N of Worthing over
Beaver Creek SN 42-080-107
Structure & Approach GradingLincoln 0.2 0.500 2018 0.625
510 NH-P 0022(60) 05L6 Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Chip SealLake
Lincoln
Miner
Minnehaha
Turner
48.0 SD11
SD19
SD34
SD44
1.362 2018 1.662
511 P 0018(185)402 036W US18 - Fm US81 to SD19; US18 -
Fm SD19 to I29
AC Surfacing; Mill & AC
Resurfacing
Hutchinson
Lincoln
Turner
* 31.6 US18 9.626 2019 12.022
512 P 0011(102)55 037Q SD11 - Fm the W Jct of US18 to S
of Sioux Falls
Mill & AC ResurfacingLincoln 8.8 SD11 2.237 2019 2.795
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
120
By County
¥¥
Lyman
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
513 IM 0904(57)189 035E
NH 0083(85)87 05H6
I 90 - WBL Fm 3 mi W of Murdo to 3
mi W of Draper; US83 - Fm SD53 to
SD248
I90 - PCC Surfacing; US83 - PCC
Surfacing, AC Surfacing of
Shoulders, Edge Drains
Jones
Lyman
* 9.4 I90W
US83
8.411 2016 9.512
514 NH 0083(84)96 04WP US83, US83N, US83S - Fm S of the
Lyman/Stanley Co Line to the
beginning of the concrete in Ft Pierre
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkLyman
Stanley
22.3 US83
US83N
US83S
12.594 2016 15.621
515 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
516 P 0273(07)61 054J SD273- Fm the I90 JCT to the JCT
of SD1806
Rout and SealLyman 12.7 SD273 0.054 2016 0.066
517 P TAPR(17) 05CJ Presho - Along Birch Ave from the
School Complex/W. Third St. to W.
6th St. and along W. 6th St. from
Birch Ave. to S. Main Ave.
Sidewalk ConstructionLyman 0.4 0.175 2016 0.214
518 PS 00SW(34) 057U Dakota Southern crossings from
Mitchell to Vivian
Replace CrossbucksAurora
Brule
Davison
Lyman
0.0 0.054 2016 0.060
519 P 0047(105)44 03U5 SD47 - Str.s 5.5 N of the Gregory
County Line Over Waterhole Ck &
7.3 S of I90 Over the White River
Replace Structure (RCBC); Scour
Protection
Lyman 0.0 SD47 0.608 2017 0.742
520 IM 0904(59)210 04D4 I90 - EBL & WBL, Fm Vivian to
Oacoma
Asphalt Surface Treatment of
Shoulders, Ramps & Crossroads;
Joint Reseal
Lyman 50.4 I90E
I90W
3.671 2017 4.035
521 P 0033(24) 055T Various Routes in the Winner Area Chip SealLyman
Mellette
35.6 SD273
SD44
0.910 2017 1.111
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
121
By County
¥¥
Lyman
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
522 P 1806(12)138 038Z SD1806 - Fm SD273 to East of
US83
Pipe Work & Erosion RepairLyman
Stanley
0.0 SD1806 3.757 2018 4.584
523 P 0248(10)239 03TY
P 0183(24)61 03U0
SD248 - Str 0.1 E of US183 Over a
Creek; US183 - Str at the
Tripp/Lyman Co Line Over the White
River
Replace Structure (RCBC) &
Approach Grading; Replace
Structure (Bridge) & Approach
Grading
Lyman
Tripp
1.1 SD248
US183
3.987 2018 5.036
524 NH 0083(75)39 03UE
NH 0018(183)247 03UF
NH 0183(22)2 03UG
P 0044(181)257 03UH
P 0047(106)52 03UJ
P 0049(04)35 03UK
US83 - Str.s 2.3 S of SD44E Over a
creek & 3.1 N of the Mellette Co Line
Over Horse Ck; US18 - Str.s 3.9 E of
US183 Over Big Hollow Ck & 2 SE
of Winner Over W Branch of
Thunder Ck; US183 - Str 2.2 N Of
the Neb State Line Over the Keya
Paha River; SD44 - Str 4 E of US18
Over Thunder Ck; SD47 - Str 5.3 S
of SD49 Over Bull Ck; SD49 - Str 7
S oh Hamill Over a creek
Scour Protection and/or Column
Repair
Lyman
Mellette
Tripp
0.0 SD44
SD47
SD49
US18
US183
US83
0.832 2018 1.017
525 IM 0903(77)131 3949 I90 - Strs, Exit 131 (Cactus Flat), 1 E
of Exit 131 (Cactus Flat), 7.5 E of
Exit 212 (US83 N), Exit 226 (US183
Presho) & Exit 251 (SD47 S)
Zone PaintingJackson
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.652 2018 0.716
526 IM 0904(60)192 04DK I90 - Strs, Over County Rd, 2.0 W of
Draper Intch; Over Sundance Road
3.6 E of the 83 N Intch; Over County
Rd, 7.5 E of US83N Intch; Over
County Rd, W Presho Intch; Over
County Rd, 6.0 E of US183 Intch;
Over County Rd, 4.0 W of Reliance
Intch
Epoxy Chip SealJones
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.724 2018 0.796
527 BRO 8043(08) 6583 7.8 N & 5.9 E of Kennebec Over
Medicine Creek
Structure & Approach GradingLyman 0.2 0.343 2018 0.429
528 NH 0031(35) 05KT Various Routes in the Pierre Area Rout and SealLyman
Potter
Stanley
52.0 US212
US83
US83N
US83S
0.213 2018 0.260
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
122
By County
¥¥
Lyman
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
529 IM 0903(105)131 04NJ I-90 - Pierre Region Crossroad ImprovementsJackson
Jones
Lyman
119.8 I90E
I90W
0.985 2019 1.082
530 IM 0903(110)132 04W1 I90 - Strs, Over Big Buffalo Crk, 1.0
E of the SD240S Interchange; Over
Fairview Rd and Over Co Rd, 7.0 W
and 4.0 W of the SD73N
Interchange; SD73N Exit; Over Co
Rd, 2.2 E of the US83S Interchange;
Over Co Rd, 4.7 W & 1.3 E of the
US83N Interchange
Epoxy Chip SealJackson
Jones
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.912 2019 1.003
531 IM 0903(111)182 05D5 I90 - Strs 2.3 E of the SD63 N
Interchange; US83 S Interchange;
3.6 E of the US83 N Interchange
Deck OverlayJackson
Jones
Lyman
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.463 2019 0.510
532 P 1806(16)138 04XW SD1806 - Fm SD273 to East of
US83; SD1806 - Strs 11.2 SE of
US83 over Antelope Ck, 6.4 NW of
SD271 Over Cedar Ck,6.7 NW of
SD271 Over Straight Ck.
Mill & AC Resurfacing; Deck
Overlay, Approach Guardrail &
Erosion Repair
Lyman
Stanley
25.6 SD1806 5.600 2019 6.835
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
123
By County
¥¥
Marshall
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
533 NH-P 0011(91) 053Q Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
95.6 SD10
SD25
SD37
SD45
US12
0.402 2016 0.491
534 P 0010(114)321 054L SD10 - Fm the East City Limits in
Britton East 11.2 Miles
Micro-SurfacingMarshall 11.2 SD10 1.028 2016 1.255
535 NH-P 0011(92) 055A Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
125.9 SD10
SD25
SD27
SD37
SD45
SD47
US281N
US281S
4.164 2017 5.080
536 NH-P 0011(104) 05KX Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealsBrown
Day
Edmunds
Faulk
Marshall
McPherson
103.6 SD20
SD239
SD25
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
US281
2.970 2018 3.625
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
124
By County
¥¥
McCook
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
537 BRO 8044(08) 02E2 Structure 8.5S & 1.1E of Montrose
over the East Fork of the Vermillion
River
Structure & Approach GradingMcCook 0.2 0.264 2016 0.330
538 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
539 NH-P 0021(158) 054E Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Rout and SealGregory
Hanson
McCook
Miner
53.2 SD25
SD251
SD42
SD47
0.239 2016 0.292
540 PH 0020(139) 04GP Mitchell Region Intersection ImprovementsClay
Lincoln
McCook
Minnehaha
Moody
Turner
1.5 SD11
SD115
SD19
SD34
SD42
SD44
US81
0.459 2016 0.510
541 BRO 8044(07) 01DV Structure 2S & 0.9W of Salem over
the W. Fork of the Vermillion River
Structure & Approach GradingMcCook 0.2 0.352 2016 0.440
542 PH 8044(09) 02MY Various County, City, & Township
Roads in McCook County & Davison
County
Signing & DelineationMcCook 0.0 1.193 2016 1.193
543 BRO 8044(11) 03DQ Structure 6.8W & 1S of Stanley
Corner over a creek SN 44-042-220
Structure & Approach GradingMcCook 0.2 0.227 2017 0.284
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
125
By County
¥¥
McCook
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
544 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
545 NH-P 0021(160) 056E Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Rout and SealDavison
McCook
Sanborn
24.3 SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
0.221 2017 0.269
546 IM 0020(155) 04XN Mitchell Region on I90 Scour ProtectionHanson
McCook
Minnehaha
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.970 2018 1.067
547 BRF 6149(06) 056V Structure 7.1S of Montrose over
East Vermillion Lake (451 Ave.) SN
44-210-177
Structure RehabilitationMcCook 0.1 0.275 2018 0.344
548 BRF 6332(02) 05LX Structure 6.1E of Center over the
East Fork of the Vermillion River
(245 St.) SN 44-191-010
Structure & Approach GradingMcCook 0.2 0.339 2018 0.423
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
126
By County
¥¥
McCook
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
549 NH-P 0021(161) 05L2 Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
McCook
Sanborn
130.3 SD1806
SD25
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
SD44
SD50
US18
US281
US81
3.736 2018 4.560
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
127
By County
¥¥
McPherson
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
550 NH-P 0032(25) 053G Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
McPherson
Potter
Walworth
115.7 SD10
SD130
SD1804
SD20
SD271
SD65
US12
US83
3.869 2016 4.721
551 NH-P 0011(91) 053Q Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
95.6 SD10
SD25
SD37
SD45
US12
0.402 2016 0.491
552 P 0032(26) 054F Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Rout and SealCampbell
Edmunds
McPherson
30.5 SD1804
SD47
0.130 2016 0.158
553 NH-P 0011(92) 055A Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Marshall
McPherson
125.9 SD10
SD25
SD27
SD37
SD45
SD47
US281N
US281S
4.164 2017 5.080
554 NH-P 0011(104) 05KX Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Chip SealsBrown
Day
Edmunds
Faulk
Marshall
McPherson
103.6 SD20
SD239
SD25
SD45
US12
US12E
US12W
US281
2.970 2018 3.625
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
128
By County
¥¥
Meade
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
555 P 6491(06) 6358
P 6446(04) 6359
Elk Vale Road (FAS 6491) from 225
St at the South Co. Line, N 6 mi. to
Elk Creek Road and Elk Creek Road
(FAS 6446) from Elk Vale Road, W 4
mi. to N. Haines Ave
Grading, Interim SurfacingMeade 10.0 2.056 2016 4.800
Total = $4.8; STP/Match = $2.509, Local Funds = $2.291
556 P 7668(05) 04AE Main Street from Middle Street to
Fourth Street in Sturgis
Grading, Storm Sewer, Curb &
Gutter, Sidewalk, AC Surfacing,
Lighting, Mill & AC Overlay
Meade 0.5 0.742 2016 3.800
Total = $3.8; STP/Match - $0.905, Local Funds - $2.895
557 HR Y505(01) 05CU I-90 Tilford Weigh/Inspection Station Augmented E-ScreeningMeade 0.0 0.000 2016 0.467
558 NH-P 0042(60) 053D Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Chip SealMeade
Perkins
44.1 SD20
SD73
1.589 2016 1.939
559 NH 0212(179)87 054Q US212 - Fm the Jct of Maurine Road
to 1.0 Mile W of the SD73 South Jct.
Micro-SurfacingMeade* 26.7 US212 2.457 2016 2.999
560 P TAPU(05) 04U6 Black Hawk - On the south side of
W. Elm St. from Short St. to Seeaire
St., on the east side of Seeaire St.
from W. Elm St. to Oak Ct. and a
portion along Peaceful Pines Road
from Seeaire St. west approximately
783 feet.
Sidewalk ConstructionMeade 0.8 0.276 2016 0.337
561 P 6491(07) 0437
P 6446(05) 042V
Elk Vale Road (FAS 6491) from 225
St at the South Co. Line, N 6 mi. to
Elk Creek Road and Elk Creek Road
(FAS 6446) from Elk Vale Road, W
4mi. To N Haines Ave.
AC SurfacingMeade 10.0 1.017 2017 2.200
Total = $2.2; STP/Match = $1.24; Local Funds = $0.96
562 IM 0901(38)40 5580 I90 - EBL & WBL between Exits 40
(Tilford) and 44 (Piedmont) &
Reconstruct Exit 44 (Piedmont)
Interchange
Reconstruct With PCCP Surf &
Str.s & Exit 44 Interchange
Meade* 4.7 I90E
I90W
33.158 2017 38.228
563 BRO 8047(18) 667R 7.5 E & 3.0 N of Bear Butte Over
Bear Butte Creek
Structure & Approach GradingMeade 0.2 0.676 2017 0.845
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
129
By County
¥¥
Meade
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
564 NH-P 0042(61) 055E Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Chip SealButte
Harding
Meade
Perkins
71.9 SD20
SD79
US85
2.520 2017 3.074
565 NH-P 0041(152) 055L Various Routes in the Rapid City
Area
Chip SealMeade
Pennington
33.1 SD240
SD240E
SD240W
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD44
1.185 2017 1.446
566 NH-PH
0034(159)39
036K SD34 - Fm SD79 E 8 mi Shoulder Widening, Spot Grading,
AC Surfacing & Replace Structure
(RCBC) Over Cottle Ck
Meade* 8.1 SD34 5.504 2017 6.115
567 NH 0212(00)114 04NF
NH 0073(00)174 04T7
US212 - Through Faith; SD73 -
Through Faith
ADA Curb Ramp UpgradesMeade 0.5 SD73
US212
0.000 2018 0.291
568 NH 0042(67) 05KY Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Chip SealsHarding
Meade
59.4 SD34
SD73
US85
1.703 2018 2.079
569 NH-P 0041(156) 05L5 Various Routes in the Rapid City
Area
Chip SealMeade
Pennington
19.0 SD240
SD34
0.543 2018 0.663
570 NH-P 0042(66) 05LA Various Locations in the Belle
Fourche Area
Crack LevelingButte
Meade
74.0 SD168
SD79
US212
1.876 2018 2.290
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
130
By County
¥¥
Mellette
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
571 BRO 8048(03) 02DY Structure 18.9N & 0.8W of Cedar
Butte over the White River
Structure & Approach GradingMellette 0.2 1.690 2016 2.112
572 P 0044(194)172 054U SD44 - Fm SD63 to US83 Crack LevelingMellette 22.9 SD44 0.585 2016 0.714
573 P 0063(49)54 054W SD63 - Fm 14.8 Mi S of the
Mellette/Jackson County Line to
Belvidere
Gravel ResurfacingJackson
Mellette
20.2 SD63 1.714 2016 2.091
574 P SRTS(44) 04P3 Wood P.E., Non Infrastructure and
Construct New Sidewalk
Mellette 0.0 0.062 2016 0.062
575 P 0033(24) 055T Various Routes in the Winner Area Chip SealLyman
Mellette
35.6 SD273
SD44
0.910 2017 1.111
576 NH 0083(75)39 03UE
NH 0018(183)247 03UF
NH 0183(22)2 03UG
P 0044(181)257 03UH
P 0047(106)52 03UJ
P 0049(04)35 03UK
US83 - Str.s 2.3 S of SD44E Over a
creek & 3.1 N of the Mellette Co Line
Over Horse Ck; US18 - Str.s 3.9 E of
US183 Over Big Hollow Ck & 2 SE
of Winner Over W Branch of
Thunder Ck; US183 - Str 2.2 N Of
the Neb State Line Over the Keya
Paha River; SD44 - Str 4 E of US18
Over Thunder Ck; SD47 - Str 5.3 S
of SD49 Over Bull Ck; SD49 - Str 7
S oh Hamill Over a creek
Scour Protection and/or Column
Repair
Lyman
Mellette
Tripp
0.0 SD44
SD47
SD49
US18
US183
US83
0.832 2018 1.017
577 NH 0083(79)45 04E7 US83 - Fm North of White River to N
of the Mellette/Jones Co Line
Grading, Interim Surfacing,
Structure Replacement over the
White & Little White River
Jones
Mellette
* 11.0 US83 18.017 2018 22.239
578 NH 0083(82)25 03RR US83 - Fm the W Jct of US18 to the
N Jct of SD44
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Drainage
Improvement, Bridge Berm Repair
Mellette
Todd
18.4 US83 5.688 2019 7.106
579 NH 0083(80)44 04E8 US83 - From White River to S of
Murdo
AC Surfacing, ADA UpgradesJones
Mellette
* 23.3 US83 14.663 2019 17.893
580 P 0044(197)196 05FU SD44 - Str 0.7 W of US83 Over the
Little White River
Epoxy Chip Seal, Joint
Replacement
Mellette 0.0 SD44 0.180 2019 0.220
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
131
By County
¥¥
Miner
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
581 P 6242(15) 03QA From 435 Ave. at Canova, W 8 mi.
on 242 St. (Co. Rd #22) to SD25
Asphalt OverlayMiner 8.0 0.967 2016 1.680
582 NH-P 0013(33) 052U Various Routes in the Huron Area Joint and Spall RepairKingsbury
Miner
21.2 SD25
SD34
US14
US14E
US14W
US81
1.570 2016 1.916
583 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
584 NH-P 0021(158) 054E Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Rout and SealGregory
Hanson
McCook
Miner
53.2 SD25
SD251
SD42
SD47
0.239 2016 0.292
585 PH 8049(21) 02UG Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Miner County
Signing & Delineation, PEMiner 0.0 1.233 2016 1.233
586 BRF 6418(09) 02ER Structure 7S & 2.6E of Carthage
over Rock Creek
Structure & Approach GradingMiner 0.2 0.248 2017 0.310
587 BRO 8049(20) 02EC Structure 5S & 6.6W of Howard over
Rock Creek
Structure & Approach GradingMiner 0.2 0.264 2017 0.330
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
132
By County
¥¥
Miner
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
588 NH-P 0021(159) 055G Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Brule
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Gregory
Hanson
Jerauld
McCook
Miner
107.1 SD203
SD25
SD251
SD258
SD42
SD45
SD47
US18
US281
2.733 2017 3.336
589 BRF 6211(09) 02EZ Structure 1E & 2S of Howard over
the West Fork of the Vermillion River
Structure & Approach GradingMiner 0.2 0.253 2018 0.315
590 NH-P 0022(60) 05L6 Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Chip SealLake
Lincoln
Miner
Minnehaha
Turner
48.0 SD11
SD19
SD34
SD44
1.362 2018 1.662
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
133
By County
¥¥
Minnehaha
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
591 P 0115(47)102 025C
P TAPR(16) 05CH
SD115 - Fm 248th St, south of Dell
Rapids, to Quarry Road/Zero St in
Dell Rapids; Dell Rapids - Along
SD115 from Dells Dr/Centennial Pl.
to Quarry Road
Grading & PCC Surfacing, Replace
Str; Shared Use Path Construction
Minnehaha 2.4 SD115 7.724 2016 9.426
592 IM 0909(76)402 00WX I90 - Fm MRM 403 to MRM 408 Construct 3 CrossoversMinnehaha 6.1 I90E 1.421 2016 1.593
593 IM 0293(96)73 01QS
IM 2292(90)0 020Q
I29 - Fm N of Exit 73 (Tea) to 57th
Street & I229 - Fm I29 to W of Exit 1
(Louise Ave) & Tea Interchange Str.
Grading, Strs, PCC Surfacing,
Lighting & Utilities
Lincoln
Minnehaha
* 5.0 I229N
I229S
I29N
I29S
25.421 2016 29.382
594 IM 2292(97)7 04VX I229 - Str, Over Rice St/RR; Exit 7
(Rice St)
Approach Slabs, Joints, Berm
Repair & Epoxy Chip Seal
Minnehaha 0.0 I229N
I229S
0.673 2016 0.740
595 NH-P 0011(90)74 052Q SD11 - Fm 2.5 Miles North of the
JCT of SD42 to Hemlock BLVD in
Corson
Joint and Spall RepairMinnehaha 4.7 SD11 0.350 2016 0.427
596 P 0022(53) 053J Various Locations in the Sioux Falls
Area
Chip SealMinnehaha
Moody
17.8 SD11
SD32
0.602 2016 0.734
597 PP 0115(52)104 0509 SD115 in Dell Rapids, 381711U, D&I Upgrade Signal System and
Crossing Surface Rehabilitation
Minnehaha 0.0 SD115 0.333 2016 0.370
598 PH 0020(139) 04GP Mitchell Region Intersection ImprovementsClay
Lincoln
McCook
Minnehaha
Moody
Turner
1.5 SD11
SD115
SD19
SD34
SD42
SD44
US81
0.459 2016 0.510
599 NH 0100(105)419 01V5 Veterans Parkway - Maple Street to
Rice Street
Urban Grading, PCC Surfacing,
Curb & Gutter, Roadway Lighting,
Traffic Signal, Storm Sewer
Minnehaha* 1.7 11.765 2016 15.020
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
134
By County
¥¥
Minnehaha
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
600 P TAPR(14) 05CF Garretson - Along Dows St. from
Main St. to Lacey Ave., and along
Lacey Ave. from Dows St. to existing
sidewalk
Shared Use Path ConstructionMinnehaha 0.2 0.114 2016 0.146
601 PS 1423(06) 05JU Marion Road in Sioux Falls,
186639V, E&E Railroad
Crossing Surface RehabilitationMinnehaha 0.0 0.072 2016 0.080
602 PH 6353(15) 051E 463rd Ave - From I-90 south to the
Minnehaha/Turner Co Line
Rumble Stripe and Durable
Pavement Markings
Minnehaha 6.4 0.102 2016 0.102
603 PP 1261(11) 02HW Cliff Ave. by 20th St. in Sioux Falls;
BNSF, DOT #075474T
Railroad SignalsMinnehaha 0.0 0.225 2016 0.250
604 PS 1261(10) 011B Cliff Ave. by 14th St. in Sioux Falls,
crossing 381-656W, BNSF
Upgrade Signals, Crossing Surface
Rehabilitation, Approach
Improvement & Preliminary
Engineering
Minnehaha 0.0 0.360 2016 0.400
605 P TAPU(02) 04Q9 In Hartford, Along Railroad Street
and the South Side of Highway
SD38, from Railroad Street to 2nd
Street.
Shared Use Path ConstructionMinnehaha 0.4 0.307 2016 0.384
606 P SRTS(42) 04P1 Valley Springs P.E., Non Infrastructure and
Construct New Sidewalk
Minnehaha 0.0 0.131 2016 0.131
607 P 0115(51)104 03RT
IM 0293(102)98 04A8
P TAPR(18) 05KP
SD115 - Fm I-29 to Quarry
Road/Zero St in Dell Rapids; I29 -
Exit 98 (Dell Rapids) ; Dell Rapids -
Along SD115 from Quarry Road to
4th Street
Grading & PCC Surfacing,
Lighting, Replace Structure
(Bridge), PCC Resurfacing, Girder
Repair, Bearing Stiffener;
Interchange Reconstruction, RCBC
Repair,; Shared Use Path
Construction
Minnehaha* 3.5 I29N
I29S
SD115
17.845 2017 21.370
608 IM 0909(75)402 00WN
NH 0100(104)420 00X8
I90 - Exit 402 (Veterans
Parkway/Timberline); Veterans
Parkway - Fm I90 to Rice Street
Construct Interchange; Grading,
Surfacing & Structures
Minnehaha* 0.0 I90E
I90W
36.805 2017 45.430
609 IM 0909(81)406 021X I90 - Str, Over Split Rock Creek 0.4
E of SD11
Replace Structure, Approach
Grading
Minnehaha 0.0 I90E
I90W
5.331 2017 6.145
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
135
By County
¥¥
Minnehaha
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
610 IM 0293(101)86 03R7
IM 0909(85)396 03R8
I29 - Strs, County Road over I29,
2.2. N of I90 Intch: County Road
over I29, 3.3 N of I90 Intch & County
Road over I29, 2.0 S of SD115 Intch;
I-90 - Strs, I90/I29 Intch & Kiwanis
Ave over I90, 0.5 E of I29 Intch:
Entire Superstructure Painting and
Zone Painting
Minnehaha 0.0 I29N
I90E
I90W
0.652 2017 0.715
611 P 0022(55) 056J Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Rout and SealLake
Lincoln
Minnehaha
25.9 SD11
SD19
0.110 2017 0.134
612 NH-P 0115(53)89 056T SD115 - Fm the End of the Divided
Lanes, N 12.1 mi
Repair ShouldersMinnehaha 12.1 SD115 0.341 2017 0.416
613 NH 2042(04) 04XM
NH 0011(101)72 05C4
P 1358(02) 05C2
NH 1157(02) 05C3
Arrowhead Parkway - Fm Sycamore
to 6 Mile Road in Sioux Falls; SD
Hwy 11 from Arrowhead Parkway S
500' in Sioux Falls; Six Mile Road
from 500' N of Arrowhead Parkway,
S 1000' in Sioux Falls; S.
Powderhouse Road from Arrowhead
Parkway N 1000' in Sioux Falls
Grading, Storm Sewer, Curb &
Gutter & PCCP Surfacing, ROW,
Signals, Lighting, Structures
Minnehaha 2.1 SD11N
SD11S
10.980 2017 13.398
614 PS 8050(70) 05K0 Grange Avenue in Sioux Falls,
186650V, E&E Railroad
Improve Crossing SurfaceMinnehaha 0.0 0.077 2017 0.086
615 PS 0022(58) 05K1 West Ave, 186646F and 10th Street
186645Y, E&E Railroad
Rehabilitation of Crossing
Surfaces, PE
Minnehaha 0.0 0.207 2017 0.230
616 IM 0292(76)56 04DH
IM 0293(104)96 04DJ
I29 - Str, Over I29, 3.0 S of US18W
Intch; I29 NB - Str, Over RR, 0.6 N
of SD44 Intch; I29 - Str, County Rd
over I29, 2.0 S of SD115 Intch
Deck Overlay, Joint Modification,
Joint Replacement (Approach
Slabs); Deck Overlay, Joint
Replacement and Approaches
Lincoln
Minnehaha
0.0 I29N 0.721 2018 0.791
617 IM 0020(155) 04XN Mitchell Region on I90 Scour ProtectionHanson
McCook
Minnehaha
0.0 I90E
I90W
0.970 2018 1.067
618 BRF 1314(07) 02TL Structure on 8th St., E of Phillips
Ave. over the Big Sioux River in
Sioux Falls (City owned) SN
50-203-206
Structure & Approach GradingMinnehaha 0.2 1.000 2018 2.500
Total Project = $2.5 (Federal Bridge Funds = $1.0, Local Match = $0.25, Local Funds = $1.25)
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
136
By County
¥¥
Minnehaha
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
619 P 1358(04) 05JD Rotary and Norline Greenway Parks
at the intersection of Southeastern
Avenue and 26th Street in Sioux
Falls
Grading, landscaping, Shared Use
Path, Structures, Lighting,
Trailhead
Minnehaha 0.0 1.130 2018 1.910
620 NH-P 0022(60) 05L6 Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Chip SealLake
Lincoln
Miner
Minnehaha
Turner
48.0 SD11
SD19
SD34
SD44
1.362 2018 1.662
621 NH-P 0011(00)77 04PE SD11 - Through Brandon ADA Curb Ramp UpgradesMinnehaha 3.7 SD11 0.000 2019 0.278
622 IM 2292(06)5 4778 I229 - Exit 5 (26th St. Intch/Yeager
Rd) in Sioux Falls
Interchange ImprovementMinnehaha* 0.0 I229N
I229S
11.666 2019 13.565
623 IM 0909(87)401 04DD I90 - EBL & WBL, Fm E of the I229
Interchange to the Minnesota State
Line
AC Overlay, Pipe WorkMinnehaha* 10.8 I90E
I90W
14.113 2019 15.851
624 IM 0909(86)379 04DU
IM 0294(70)103 04DT
I90 - Strs, Exit 379 (SD19); Over I90
1.2 E of Exit 379 (SD19); 4.8 W &
2.8 W of Exit 390 (SD38); 2.1 W of
Exit 396 (I29); I29 - Strs, 3.2 N of
Minnehaha County Line, 5.0 S of
Exit 109 (SD34); Exit 109 (SD34);
Exit 114 (SD32)
Zone Painting, Girder RepairMinnehaha
Moody
0.0 I29N
I90E
I90W
1.325 2019 1.456
625 PH 1400(10) 00YE City of Sioux Falls - Western & 41st
St.
Install Right Turn Lane EB to SB
and WB to NB, Widen S Leg For
Additional Lt Turn Lane, PE, ROW
Minnehaha 0.0 0.823 2019 0.914
626 P 1358(05) 05JE
P 1225(06) 05JF
26th Street from Cleveland Avenue
to 1,050 feet West of Southeastern
Avenue in Sioux Falls; Southeastern
Avenue from Klondike Trail to South
Lighthouse Place in Sioux Falls
Grading, Intersection
Improvements, Storm Sewer, Curb
& Gutter, PCCP and AC Surfacing,
Signals, Lighting, Permanent
Signing, Sidewalk, Structure;
Grading, Intersection
Improvements, Storm Sewer, Curb
& Gutter, PCCP and AC Surfacing,
Signals, Lighting, Permanent
Signing, Sidewalk, Structure
Minnehaha* 0.0 15.527 2019 21.107
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
137
By County
¥¥
Moody
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
627 P 0022(53) 053J Various Locations in the Sioux Falls
Area
Chip SealMinnehaha
Moody
17.8 SD11
SD32
0.602 2016 0.734
628 PH 0020(139) 04GP Mitchell Region Intersection ImprovementsClay
Lincoln
McCook
Minnehaha
Moody
Turner
1.5 SD11
SD115
SD19
SD34
SD42
SD44
US81
0.459 2016 0.510
629 IM 0020(127) 035D Mitchell Region on I29 Scour ProtectionLincoln
Moody
0.0 I29N
I29S
1.015 2017 1.116
630 BRO 8051(12) 03DX Structure 2E & 2.2N of Flandreau,
on 483 Ave., over Mud Creek SN
51-170-078
Structure & Approach GradingMoody 0.2 0.239 2017 0.300
631 IM 0294(69)121 04NM I-29 Aberdeen Region Interstate Crossroad
Improvements
Brookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Moody
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.222 2018 0.244
632 NH 0022(61) 05LN Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Joint and SpallLake
Moody
10.3 SD34 0.984 2018 1.200
633 IM 0909(86)379 04DU
IM 0294(70)103 04DT
I90 - Strs, Exit 379 (SD19); Over I90
1.2 E of Exit 379 (SD19); 4.8 W &
2.8 W of Exit 390 (SD38); 2.1 W of
Exit 396 (I29); I29 - Strs, 3.2 N of
Minnehaha County Line, 5.0 S of
Exit 109 (SD34); Exit 109 (SD34);
Exit 114 (SD32)
Zone Painting, Girder RepairMinnehaha
Moody
0.0 I29N
I90E
I90W
1.325 2019 1.456
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
138
By County
¥¥
Oglala Lakota
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
634 P SRTS(29) 03X2 Kyle Safe Routes to School, Sidewalk,
and Non-infrastructure projects. PE
Oglala Lakota 0.0 0.069 2016 0.069
635 NH-P 0043(17) 056A Various Routes in the Custer Area Rout and SealCuster
Oglala Lakota
31.3 SD391
SD87
US18
0.134 2017 0.163
636 NH-P 0043(19) 05L0 Various Routes in the Custer Area Chip SealCuster
Oglala Lakota
31.3 SD391
SD87
US18
0.134 2018 0.163
637 NH 0018(201)62 04WL US18 - Fm the S Jct with US385 to
Oglala
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkFall River
Oglala Lakota
25.5 US18 7.374 2019 9.210
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
139
By County
¥¥
Pennington
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
638 P 0044(173)78 03A5 SD44 - 14.2 SE of Farmingdale over
the Cheyenne River
Rehab (Epoxy Chip, Bolted Splices
and Zone painting)
Pennington 0.0 SD44 0.673 2016 0.821
639 P FLAP(01) 04QN Norris Peak Road North of SD44
and South of Geary Blvd.
Realignment & Shoulder WideningPennington 0.0 0.000 2016 0.738
This project is funded and administered through the Central Federal Lands Office of FHWA.
640 IM 0901(182)23 02Q0
IM 0902(160)67 034L
I90 - Exit 67 (Liberty Blvd.); I90 - Exit
23 (Whitewood)
Partial Interchange LightingLawrence
Pennington
1.3 I90E 0.289 2016 0.321
641 IM 0901(175)58 035J I90 - Strs, Haines Ave Interchange;
I90 WB On Ramp, 2.0 E of US16B
Intch; I90 WB On Ramp, 2.9 W of
Box Elder; Liberty Blvd, Exit 67; Over
County Rd/Draw; 1.0 East of Exit 67;
2.1 E of Elk Vale Rd Exit Over a
Creek
Diaphragm, Bent Cap, Approach
Slab Repair, Epoxy Chip Seals &
Joints, Approach Pavement
Pennington 0.0 I90E
I90W
1.054 2016 1.158
642 IM 0903(102)112 03W0
NH 0014(216)112 05EE
I90 - WBL, Fm US14 to the E Jct.
with SD 240; US14 - Fm I-90, E 2 mi
Mill & AC ResurfacingJackson
Pennington
* 21.5 I90W
US14E
US14W
5.899 2016 6.737
643 NH-P 0016(86)11 054A Various Locations in the Custer Area Rout and SealCuster
Pennington
21.1 US16
US16A
US16AE
US16AW
0.092 2016 0.112
644 NH-P 0041(151) 054G Various Locations in the Rapid City
Area
Rout and SealLawrence
Pennington
15.6 SD44
SD44E
SD44W
US85
0.069 2016 0.085
645 PS 0044(180)43 04CQ SD44 - Mt. View Rd in Rapid City,
crossing 190277T, RCP&E
Rehabilitation of crossing surfacePennington 0.0 SD44 0.081 2016 0.090
646 NH 0016(79)68 027C US16 - Fm St James St to Omaha
St in Rapid City
Urban Grading, Storm Sewer, Curb
& Gutter, Sidewalk, Lighting,
Signals & PCC Surfacing Fm St
James St. to Kansas City St; Minor
Joint & Spall Repair Fm Kansas
City St. to Omaha St.
Pennington* 0.8 US16 5.287 2016 6.958
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
140
By County
¥¥
Pennington
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
647 P 0040(21)38 03T7 SD40 - Fm Hayward to the South
Jct. with SD79 at Hermosa
AC ResurfacingCuster
Pennington
8.8 SD40 2.165 2016 2.704
648 IM 0190(12)1 05DX I190 - Str. I 90 & I 190 Interchange
(Exit 57)
Replace the Sign Brackets on the
Sign(s) Attached to Structure at
Exit 57.
Pennington 0.0 I190N
I190S
0.023 2016 0.026
649 BRO 8052(61) 033L Structure 3.5W & 1.3N of Caputa
over Rapid Creek (Bradsky Road)
SN 52-500-347
Structure & Approach GradingPennington 0.0 0.400 2016 0.500
650 P TAPU(15) 05CC Rapid City - Along I-190 and SD44 /
Omaha St., from approximately 850
feet North of the Rapid Creek Bridge
along I190, to N. Mount Rushmore
Rd.
Shared Use Path ConstructionPennington 0.5 0.138 2016 0.169
Rapid City - Along I-190 and SD44 / Omaha St., from approximately 850 feet North of the Rapid Creek Bridge
along I190, to N. Mount Rushmore Rd.
651 PP 8052(70) 05JW 6th Street in Rapid City, 190269B,
RCP&E
Improve Railroad Signals, Crossing
Surface, and PE
Pennington 0.0 0.450 2016 0.500
652 PP 1701(14) 05JX West Bulevard in Rapid City,
190272J, RCP&E
Improve Signal System, Crossing
Surface, and PE
Pennington 0.0 0.369 2016 0.410
653 P TAPU(09) 04UA Rapid City - On the east side of
Cambell St. from the end of the side
path south of Rocker Dr., north to
the rail banked line south of Centre
St., southeast on the rail bed to
Kennel Dr., north on the west side of
Kennel Dr. to Centre St., east on the
north side of Centre St. to a private
property connection to the
intersection of E. Omaha St./Hwy.
44 and Mickelson Dr.
Shared Use Path ConstructionPennington 0.9 0.207 2016 0.573
654 EM 1648(06) 04P6 East Anamosa Street Extension
from LaCrosse Street to Century
Road
PE, ROW, Landscaping, Midblock
Ped. Crossing with Signals and
Push Buttons, Median Island and
ADA Ramps, Reconnection of
Century Road to include Grading,
C&G, PCCP, Asphalt Approach,
Sidewalk
Pennington 0.7 0.496 2016 0.605
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
141
By County
¥¥
Pennington
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
655 P 0ENH(216) 03L2 Along Main Street in Hill City Streetscape, PE, & ConstructionPennington 0.0 0.225 2016 0.275
656 P 6480(04) 5777 Sheridan Lake Road from Jct. of
US385 to Alberta Road
Grading, Base Course, Curb &
Gutter, AC Surfacing
Pennington 9.7 2.008 2017 8.500
Total = $8.5; STP/Match = $2.45; Local Funds = $6.05
657 BRF 6403(09) 02JT SN 52-162-272 located 0.6W & 0.1S
of Rochford over Rapid Creek
Structure & Approach GradingPennington 0.2 0.319 2017 0.400
658 NH-P 0043(16) 055D Various Routes in the Custer Area Chip SealCuster
Pennington
41.9 SD40
US16
US16A
US16AE
US16AW
1.453 2017 1.774
659 NH-P 0041(152) 055L Various Routes in the Rapid City
Area
Chip SealMeade
Pennington
33.1 SD240
SD240E
SD240W
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD44
1.185 2017 1.446
660 P 0240(13)128 056G SD240 - Fm Wall to Bad Lands
National Park
Rout and SealPennington 6.3 SD240 0.026 2017 0.032
661 NH 0016(84)67 049F US16 - Fm Flormann St to St James
St. in Rapid City
Urban Grading, Storm Sewer, Curb
& Gutter, Sidewalk, Lighting,
Signals & PCC Surfacing
Pennington* 0.6 US16 5.259 2017 6.869
662 EM-BRF 6403(06) 00CL South Rochford Rd fm Rochford SW
to Deerfield Rd
Grading, Drainage, Base Course,
Asphalt Concrete, & PE For
Structure #52-162-272
Pennington 9.5 8.034 2017 9.804
Total Project Estimated at $10.4 mill. ($7.65 in Earmark Funds, & $2.35 in Local Funds & $0.4 in Bridge
Funds.)
663 P 016A(08)59 04FU US16A WB & EB - Over US16E at
the Keystone Interchange
Bridge RehabilitationPennington 0.0 US16AE
US16AW
0.593 2018 0.724
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
142
By County
¥¥
Pennington
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
664 IM 0902(165)53 04DL I90 - Strs, Over Box Elder Crk, 0.6
SE of Meade Co Line; I90WF over
I90, 2.3 E of Exit 61 (US16B), Exit
112 (US14)
Deck Overlay, Epoxy Deck Seal,
Abutment Backwall Repair and
Approach Slab Repair
Pennington 0.0 I90E
I90W
0.896 2018 0.985
665 BRO 8052(49) 6890 0.4 E & 0.3 N of Hill City Over Major
Lake Spillway (City Owned)
Structure & Approach GradingPennington 0.2 0.227 2018 0.284
666 BRO 8052(66) 03YD Structure 0.8E & 1.8S of Johnson
Siding over Rapid Creek
(Thunderhead Falls Road) SN
52-316-316
Structure & Approach GradingPennington 0.2 0.248 2018 0.310
667 PH 3230(05) 01DJ Box Elder - Pennington Co Rd 14-16
- From Exit 63 East to the End of the
Divided Section East of Ellsworth
Road
Reconstruction - Convert divided
section to a 3-lane section; PE,
ROW
Pennington 3.0 5.539 2018 6.155
668 NH 0044(00)44 04TG
NH 0016(00)69 05JH
SD44/US16 (Omaha Street) - Fm
12th Street to LaCrosse St in Rapid
City
Traffic Signal Upgrades, ADA
Upgrades
Pennington 1.9 SD44
SD44E
SD44W
US16E
US16W
0.000 2018 2.000
669 NH-P 0040(238) 05KU Various Routes in the Rapid City
Region
Rout and SealCuster
Lawrence
Pennington
24.2 SD40
US14A
US14E
US14W
0.099 2018 0.121
670 NH-P 0041(156) 05L5 Various Routes in the Rapid City
Area
Chip SealMeade
Pennington
19.0 SD240
SD34
0.543 2018 0.663
671 NH 0043(20) 05LF Various Routes in the Custer Area Joint and Spall RepairCuster
Pennington
28.5 US16
US16E
US16W
US385
2.745 2018 3.350
672 NH-P 0041(157) 05LH Various Routes in the Rapid City
Area
Joint and Spall RepairPennington 6.8 SD44
SD445
0.656 2018 0.800
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
143
By County
¥¥
Pennington
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
673 P 016A(00)55 04PG US16A - Through Keystone US16A - Mill & AC Resurfacing &
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades
Pennington 1.3 US16A 0.922 2019 1.152
674 P 0244(11)27 04FT SD244 - 3.2 mi S of US385 & 16
Over Palmer Gulch
Replace Structure (Bridge) and
Approach Grading
Pennington 0.0 SD244 1.055 2019 1.288
675 PH 8052(71) 04L4 Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Pennington County
Signing & Delineation, PEPennington 0.0 1.582 2019 1.582
676 P 0231(12)80 02R5 SD231, SD231 N&S - Fm Sheffer St.
to Sturgis Road in Rapid City
Urban Grading, Roadway Lighting,
Storm Sewer, Curb & Gutter,
Sidewalk, Traffic Signals,
Pedestrian Crossing & PCC
Surfacing
Pennington 1.1 SD231
SD231N
SD231S
11.053 2019 14.142
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
144
By County
¥¥
Perkins
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
677 P 6167(09) 04VT 27 mi. of Bixby Road from SD20, 5W
of Bison, S to the S County Line,
Excluding 10 mi. between Ridgeview
Road and the Moreau River Bridge
AC OverlayPerkins 27.0 1.327 2016 5.700
Total = $5.7; STP/State Match = $1.62; Local &/or SIB = $4.08
678 P-PH 0073(60)231 023A
NH-PH
0012(168)80
02QB
NH 0012(159)91 02R8
SD73 - Fm 1.5 mi N of the Grand
River (Dewitt Rd) to the west Jct. of
US12; US12 - From the ND State
Line to Lemon; US12 - Through
Lemmon
SD73 - Shoulder Widening & AC
Shoulder Surfacing, Roadway
Lighting, Replace Structure
(RCBC) Over E Flat Creek; US12 -
Shoulder Widening & AC Shoulder
Surfacing, Roadway Lighting,
Replace Structure; US12 Through
Lemmon - Lighting & Curb Ramp
Upgrades
Perkins 22.0 SD73
US12
13.265 2016 14.178
SD73 - Fm 1.5 mi N of the Grand River (Dewitt Rd) to the west Jct. of US12
679 NH-P 0042(60) 053D Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Chip SealMeade
Perkins
44.1 SD20
SD73
1.589 2016 1.939
680 NH 0012(184)80 04DV
P 0073(69)229 04DW
SD73 - Fm the Grand River to the
West Jct of US12; US12 - Fm the
ND State Line E to the
Perkins/Corson County Line
Mill & AC ResurfacingPerkins 31.6 SD73
US12
9.023 2017 11.268
681 NH-P 0042(61) 055E Various Routes in the Belle Fourche
Area
Chip SealButte
Harding
Meade
Perkins
71.9 SD20
SD79
US85
2.520 2017 3.074
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
145
By County
¥¥
Potter
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
682 P 1806(06)365 02A7
NH 0012(152)187 02A6
NH 0212(149)208 02A8
SD1806 - 0.4 mi N of US12; US12 -
Missouri River Bridge at Mobridge;
US212 - Missouri River Bridge at
Forest City
Substructure WorkCorson
Potter
Walworth
0.0 SD1806
US12
US212
2.692 2016 3.060
683 P 6682(01) 04VR From 296 Ave., 4 mi. NW of the
Junction of US212 and SD1804, W 2
mi. on 160 St. and S 0.6 mi. on 294
Ave.
Mill, Base Course, BlotterPotter 0.0 0.311 2016 0.379
684 NH 0212(178)226 04WM US212 - Fm Gettysburg to E of the
W Jct with SD47
Subgrade, Process in PlacePotter 9.4 US212 5.255 2016 6.480
685 NH-P 0032(25) 053G Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
McPherson
Potter
Walworth
115.7 SD10
SD130
SD1804
SD20
SD271
SD65
US12
US83
3.869 2016 4.721
686 NH 0212(180)235 056Q US212 - Fm SD47 to the
Potter/Faulk County Line
Crack LevelingFaulk
Potter
9.2 US212 0.230 2017 0.281
687 BRO 8054(04) 02X0 Structure 7N & 6.8W of Gettysburg
over the Cheyenne Creek SN
54-152-090
Structure & Approach GradingPotter 0.2 0.270 2018 0.337
688 PH 8054(05) 02UK Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Potter County
Signing & Delineation, PEPotter 0.0 1.155 2018 1.155
689 NH 0212(00)208 05HY US 212 - Str. at the Dewey-Potter
County Line over the Missouri River
(Oahe Lake)
Replace Overheight PortalPotter 0.0 US212 0.000 2018 0.053
690 NH 0031(35) 05KT Various Routes in the Pierre Area Rout and SealLyman
Potter
Stanley
52.0 US212
US83
US83N
US83S
0.213 2018 0.260
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
146
By County
¥¥
Potter
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
691 NH-P 0031(34) 05L4 Various Routes in the Pierre Area Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Hyde
Jackson
Potter
Stanley
Sully
93.6 SD1804
SD1806
SD34
SD47
SD73
2.685 2018 3.276
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
147
By County
¥¥
Regionwide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
692 P 000S(00)009 03DF Various Locations in the Aberdeen
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2016 0.264
$0.264 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.158, County - $0.106)
693 P 000S(00)010 03DG Various Locations in the Rapid City
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2016 0.156
$0.156 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.094, County - $0.062)
694 P 000S(00)011 03DH Various Locations in the Pierre
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2016 0.042
$0.042 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.025, County - $0.017)
695 P 000S(00)012 03DJ Various Locations in the Mitchell
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2016 0.372
$0.372 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.223, County - $0.149)
696 PH 0010(92) 03B3 Various locations on the State
System in the Aberdeen Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.306 2016 0.306
697 PH 0020(128) 03B4 Various locations on the State
System in the Mitchell Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.561 2016 0.561
698 PH 0030(11) 03B5 Various locations on the State
System in the Pierre Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.224 2016 0.224
699 PH 0040(19) 03B6 Various locations on the State
System in the Rapid City Region
Cold Plastics Durable Pavement
Marking
Regionwide 0.0 0.281 2016 0.281
700 PH 0040(20) 03B7 Various locations on the State
System in the Rapid City Region
Sprayable Durable Pavement
Marking
Regionwide 0.0 0.255 2016 0.255
701 PH 0040(311) 03VF Rapid City Region Guardrail ReplacementRegionwide 0.0 1.020 2016 1.020
702 PH 0010(103) 04GX Aberdeen Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 1.020 2016 1.020
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
148
By County
¥¥
Regionwide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
703 PH 0020(141) 04GY Mitchell Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 1.020 2016 1.020
704 PH 0040(216) 04H1 Rapid City Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 0.816 2016 0.816
705 PH 0040(225) 04YX Rapid City Region Intersection ImprovementsRegionwide 0.459 2016 0.510
706 P 0010(00)17 04UQ Regionwide Aberdeen Region Bridge
Rehabilitation
Regionwide 0.0 0.000 2017 0.312
707 P 0020(00)17 04UR Regionwide Mitchell Region Bridge
Rehabilitation
Regionwide 0.0 0.000 2017 0.312
708 P 0030(00)17 04UT Regionwide Pierre Region Bridge RehabilitationRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2017 0.312
709 P 0040(00)17 04UU Regionwide Rapid City Region Bridge
Rehabilitation
Regionwide 0.0 0.000 2017 0.312
710 P 000S(00)013 043A Various Locations in the Rapid City
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2017 0.156
$0.156 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.094, County - $0.062)
711 P 000S(00)014 043C Various Locations in the Aberdeen
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2017 0.264
$0.264 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.158, County - $0.106)
712 P 000S(00)016 043E Various Locations in the Mitchell
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2017 0.372
$0.372 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.223, County - $0.149)
713 P 000S(00)015 043D Various Locations in the Pierre
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2017 0.042
$0.042 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.025, County - $0.017)
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
149
By County
¥¥
Regionwide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
714 PH 0010(97) 03V3 Various locations on the State
System in the Aberdeen Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.312 2017 0.312
715 PH 0020(131) 03UT Various locations on the State
System in the Mitchell Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.572 2017 0.572
716 PH 0030(13) 03UU Various locations on the State
System in the Pierre Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.229 2017 0.229
717 PH 0040(25) 03UV Various locations on the State
System in the Rapid City Region
Cold Plastics Durable Pavement
Marking
Regionwide 0.0 0.208 2017 0.208
718 PH 0040(24) 03UW Various locations on the State
System in the Rapid City Region
Sprayable Durable Pavement
Marking
Regionwide 0.0 0.338 2017 0.338
719 PH 0010(104) 04H5 Aberdeen Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 1.040 2017 1.040
720 PH 0020(143) 04H4 Mitchell Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 1.040 2017 1.040
721 PH 0040(217) 04H2 Rapid City Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 0.541 2017 0.541
722 PH 0020(164) 05G3 Mitchell Region Intersection ImprovementsRegionwide 0.0 0.468 2017 0.520
723 PH 0010(121) 05G4 Aberdeen Region Intersection ImprovementsRegionwide 0.0 0.468 2017 0.520
724 PH 0030(31) 05G5 Pierre Region Intersection ImprovementsRegionwide 0.0 0.468 2017 0.520
725 PH 0040(236) 05G6 Rapid City Region Intersection ImprovementsRegionwide 0.0 0.468 2017 0.520
726 P 0010(00)18 04UV Regionwide Aberdeen Region Bridge
Rehabilitation
Regionwide 0.0 0.000 2018 0.212
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
150
By County
¥¥
Regionwide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
727 P 0020(00)18 04UW Regionwide Mitchell Region Bridge
Rehabilitation
Regionwide 0.0 0.000 2018 0.212
728 P 0030(00)18 04UX Regionwide Pierre Region Bridge RehabilitationRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2018 0.212
729 P 0040(00)18 04UY Regionwide Rapid City Region Bridge
Rehabilitation
Regionwide 0.0 0.000 2018 0.212
730 P 0040(00)215 04LM Various Locations in the Rapid City
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2018 0.156
$0.156 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.094, County - $0.062)
731 P 0010(00)216 04LN Various Locations in the Aberdeen
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2018 0.264
$0.264 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.158, County - $0.106)
732 P 0020(00)217 04LP Various Locations in the Mitchell
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2018 0.372
$0.372 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.223, County - $0.149)
733 P 0030(21) 04LQ Various Locations in the Pierre
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2018 0.042
$0.042 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.025, County - $0.017)
734 PH 0010(105) 04H6 Various locations on the State
System in the Aberdeen Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.318 2018 0.318
735 PH 0020(146) 04H7 Various locations on the State
System in the Mitchell Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.584 2018 0.584
736 PH 0030(22) 04H8 Various locations on the State
System in the Pierre Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.233 2018 0.233
737 PH 0040(218) 04H9 Various locations on the State
System in the Rapid City Region
Cold Plastics Durable Pavement
Marking
Regionwide 0.0 0.212 2018 0.212
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
151
By County
¥¥
Regionwide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
738 PH 0040(219) 04HA Various locations on the State
System in the Rapid City Region
Sprayable Durable Pavement
Marking
Regionwide 0.0 0.345 2018 0.345
739 PH 0010(113) 04XX Aberdeen Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 0.981 2018 0.981
740 PH 0020(159) 04XY Mitchell Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 0.981 2018 0.981
741 PH 0040(229) 04Y1 Rapid City Region Corridor Signing, PERegionwide 0.0 0.981 2018 0.981
742 P 0040(00)219 04LU Various Locations in the Rapid City
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2019 0.156
$0.156 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.094, County - $0.062)
743 P 0010(00)220 04LV Various Locations in the Aberdeen
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2019 0.264
$0.264 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.158, County - $0.106)
744 P 0020(00)225 04LW Various Locations in the Mitchell
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2019 0.372
$0.372 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.223, County - $0.149)
745 P 0030(00)226 04LX Various Locations in the Pierre
Region
County Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.000 2019 0.042
$0.042 - State funds at 60/40 (State - $0.025, County - $0.017)
746 PH 0010(106) 04HT Various locations on the State
System in the Aberdeen Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.325 2019 0.325
747 PH 0020(147) 04HU Various locations on the State
System in the Mitchell Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.595 2019 0.595
748 PH 0030(23) 04HV Various locations on the State
System in the Pierre Region
Durable Pavement MarkingRegionwide 0.0 0.238 2019 0.238
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
152
By County
¥¥
Regionwide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
749 PH 0040(220) 04HW Various locations on the State
System in the Rapid City Region
Cold Plastics Durable Pavement
Marking
Regionwide 0.0 0.216 2019 0.216
750 PH 0040(221) 04HX Various locations on the State
System in the Rapid City Region
Sprayable Durable Pavement
Marking
Regionwide 0.0 0.352 2019 0.352
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
153
By County
¥¥
Roberts
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
751 IM 0299(67)232 040F I29 - Watertown Area Replace Interstate Fence - West
Side
Roberts 20.6 I29S 0.167 2016 0.184
752 HR Y504(01) 05CT I-29 - Sisseton Weigh/Inspection
Station
Augmented E-ScreeningRoberts 0.0 0.000 2016 0.467
753 NH 0012(192) 052T Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Joint and Spall RepairBrookings
Grant
Roberts
35.5 US12
US14
3.419 2016 4.172
754 PS 000S(325) 04CD Sisseton-Milbank crossings from
Milbank to Sisseton
Replace crossbuck signsGrant
Roberts
0.0 0.060 2016 0.060
755 P 0015(80)182 05KG SD15 - From the Grant/Roberts
County Line to the Jct of SD123 at
Wilmont
Crack LevelingRoberts 16.3 SD15 0.410 2016 0.500
756 IM 0299(64)206 03R5 I29 - Strs, Grant/Roberts Co Line;
0.6 S of US12 Over the BNSF RR;
US12/I29 Intch; 1.6 SW of SD15
Intch; SD15/I29 Intch; 4.0 N of SD15
Intch; 2.0 S of Peever Intch; 3.0 S of
SD10 Intch;
Zone PaintingRoberts 0.0 I29N
I29S
0.844 2017 0.927
757 IM 0299(76)231 05AT I-29 - Exit 232 (SD10), Sisseton Port
of Entry, Exit 242 (New Effington),
Exit 246 (Victor)
Ramp Detours along I-29Roberts 0.0 I29N
I29S
1.239 2017 1.362
758 BRO 8055(29) 03EN Structure 1.2N & 1W of Corona, on
471 Ave., over a creek SN
55-220-399
Structure & Approach GradingRoberts 0.2 0.256 2017 0.320
759 NH-P 0012(196) 055X Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Rout and SealBrookings
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
25.3 SD10
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
0.112 2017 0.137
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
154
By County
¥¥
Roberts
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
760 P 0106(06)334 04V0
P 0010(120)363 05FK
NH 0012(200)399 05FD
P 0020(163)450 05FL
SD106 - 3.2 W of SD127 Over the
Little Minnesota River; SD10 - Str
1.7 E of I29 Over the Little
Minnesota River; US12 - Str 0.6 E of
SD109 Over the Whetsone River Div
Channel; SD20 - Str 4.1 E of SD15
Over a creek
Epoxy Chip Seal; Fiber WrapGrant
Roberts
0.0 SD10
SD106
SD20
US12
0.326 2018 0.397
761 IM 0294(69)121 04NM I-29 Aberdeen Region Interstate Crossroad
Improvements
Brookings
Codington
Deuel
Grant
Moody
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.222 2018 0.244
762 IM 0299(72)225 021V I29 - SBL - Fm N of Exit 224
(Peever) N to S of Exit 242; Str.s:
1.4 N of the Peever Exit Over Hines
Creek; 1.8 N of the Peever Exit Over
Agency Creek; 5.1 S of the SD10
Exit Over 124th St/Goodwill Creek;
0.8 N of the SD10 Exit Over the Little
Minn. River; .5 NE of the SD10Exit
Over a drainage ditch
PCC Surfacing; Epoxy Chip SealRoberts* 15.0 I29S 16.019 2018 18.026
763 P 0010(91)358 028U
NH-P 0010(118)361 05EJ
SD10 - Fm the west city limits in
Sisseton to 458th Ave (8th Ave) East
in Sisseton; Fm 8th Ave E to SD127;
SD10 - Fm E of SD127 to E of I29
SD10 - Grading, Roundabouts,
Replace Structure (RCBC) & AC
Surfacing; Chip Seal
Roberts* 3.8 SD10 6.503 2018 8.239
764 BRF 6202(03) 05M0 Structure 6.5S & 0.8E of Claire City
over a creek on 112 St. SN
55-068-120
Structure & Approach GradingRoberts 0.2 0.231 2018 0.290
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
155
By County
¥¥
Roberts
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
765 NH-P 0012(203) 05L7 Various Routes in the Watertown
Area
Chip SealBrookings
Deuel
Grant
Hamlin
Roberts
84.0 SD10
SD101
SD15
SD22
SD30
US12
US14
US14B
US14E
US14EB
US14W
US14WB
US81
2.483 2018 3.030
766 IM 0299(71)239 04D6 I29 - SBL, From S of Exit 242 to S of
the ND State Line
PCC Surfacing, Epoxy Chip Seal,
Approach Slabs, Joint
Modifications, Approach
Modifications
Roberts* 14.3 I29S 13.753 2019 15.476
767 IM 0299(75)206 04VY I29 - Strs, 0.6 S of the US12, 8 N of
US212, 2 S of Roberts Co Line, 6.2
S of US12 and 2 N of Codington Co
Line
Epoxy Chip SealCodington
Grant
Roberts
0.0 I29N
I29S
0.725 2019 0.798
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
156
By County
¥¥
Sanborn
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
768 BRO 8056(13) 02EV Structure 2.3E & 6N of Artesian over
West Redstone Creek
Structure & Approach GradingSanborn 0.2 0.256 2016 0.320
769 P 0021(157) 053F Various Locations in the Mitchell
Area
Chip SealBrule
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
Lyman
McCook
Miner
Sanborn
57.7 I90L
SD1806
SD34
SD42
SD44
1.449 2016 1.769
770 NH 0037(149)113 05KE SD37 N&S from 2 miles South of the
SD244 JCT to North of 33rd ST SE
in Huron
Micro-surfacingBeadle
Sanborn
* 10.7 SD37N
SD37S
2.457 2016 2.999
771 BRO 8056(12) 02E3 Structure 0.5E & 3.4N of Artesian
over a creek
Structure & Approach GradingSanborn 0.2 0.256 2017 0.320
772 NH-P 0021(160) 056E Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Rout and SealDavison
McCook
Sanborn
24.3 SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
0.221 2017 0.269
773 NH 0034(161)338 03TM SD34 - Str.s 0.9 SE of Forrestburg
Over the James River
Scour Protection & Upstream
Guidebank
Sanborn 0.0 SD34E
SD34W
0.315 2018 0.385
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
157
By County
¥¥
Sanborn
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
774 NH-P 0021(161) 05L2 Various Routes in the Mitchell Area Chip SealAurora
Buffalo
Charles Mix
Davison
Gregory
Hanson
McCook
Sanborn
130.3 SD1806
SD25
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
SD37
SD37N
SD37S
SD38
SD44
SD50
US18
US281
US81
3.736 2018 4.560
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
158
By County
¥¥
Spink
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
775 NH 0212(160)306 03A6 US212 - 0.3 NW of US281S over
Turtle Ck
Replace Structure (Bridge) and
Approach Grading
Spink 0.0 US212 2.431 2016 2.966
776 BRO 8058(17) 02E1 Structure on 7th St. E in Redfield
over Turtle Creek (City owned)
Structure & Approach GradingSpink 0.2 0.226 2016 0.284
777 NH 0212(156)306 023T
NH 0281(99)152 03HS
US212 - Fm 2nd St. West in
Redfield to west of the James River;
US281 - Fm 16th Ave N To The
West US212/US281 Jct & Fm The
East US212/US281 Jct N To the
North City Limits in Redfield
Mill & AC Resurfacing, ADA
Upgrades, Signal, Roadway
Lighting
Spink* 8.5 US212
US281
3.544 2016 4.336
778 NH-P 0013(35) 054D Various Locations in the Huron Area Rout and SealBuffalo
Clark
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
96.0 SD25
SD28
SD34
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
0.388 2016 0.473
779 P 0020(130)295 03TW
P 0037(132)157 03TX
SD20 - Str.s 0.8 S of SD45N Over a
Creek, 3.3 E of the Faulk Co Line
Over Snake Creek, & 4.3 E of the
Faulk Co Line Over Snake Creek;
SD37 - Str. 6 S of US212 Over a
Creek
Scour Protection, Scour Protection
& Column Repair (58-033-060);
Scour Protection
Faulk
Spink
0.0 SD20
SD37
0.283 2017 0.346
780 NH 0281(102)159 03UN
NH 0014(190)381 03UP
US281 - Str 5.8 N of US212 Over
Snake Ck; US14 - Str 3.1 E of SD25
Over a creek
Scour ProtectionKingsbury
Spink
0.0 US14
US281
0.228 2017 0.278
781 P 6520(08) 02SU From the W Co. Line 2 mi. S of
US212, E 9.5 mi. on 174 St. (Spink
Co. 18)
Mill, Base, BlotterSpink 9.5 1.123 2017 1.370
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
159
By County
¥¥
Spink
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
782 NH-P 0013(36) 055F Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealBuffalo
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
* 139.4 SD25
SD26
SD28
SD34
SD45
SD47
US281
US281N
US281S
4.801 2017 5.860
783 P 0013(37) 056D Various Routes in the Huron Area Rout and SealSpink 18.1 SD37 0.078 2017 0.096
784 PH 8058(19) 02UF Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Spink County from the N
County Line, S to 0.5 mi. S of 172
St.
Signing & Delineation, (PE for Full
County)
Spink 0.0 1.435 2017 1.435
785 P 0026(01)267 026Q SD26 - Fm the Hand/Spink County
Line to US281
Mill & AC ResurfacingSpink 11.9 SD26 3.071 2017 3.836
786 NH-P 0013(39) 05KL Various Routes in the Huron Area;
Various Routes in the Huron Area
Rout and Seal; Rout and SealBeadle
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
66.9 SD45
US14
US281
0.275 2017 0.335
787 PH 8058(21) 05LT Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Spink County from the S
County Line, N to 0.5 mi. S of 172
St.
Signing & DelineationSpink 0.0 1.435 2017 1.435
788 NH 0212(00)327 04P7 US212 - Through Doland and Clark ADA Curb Ramp UpgradesClark
Spink
1.0 US212 0.000 2018 0.229
789 PH 0281(105)173 04JC Intersection of US281 & SD20 Intersection ModificationSpink 0.0 US281N
US281S
0.143 2018 0.159
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
160
By County
¥¥
Spink
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
790 NH 0012(269)269 04V1
P 0037(148)175 05FJ
US12, US12 E&W - Strs 6.7 East of
Ipswich Over Preachers Run Creek;
0.1 E of the Edmunds/Brown Co
Line Over Snake Creek (2); 0.7
West of US 281 South Over Foot
Creek; SD37 - Strs 6.4 N of US212
Over a branch of Fordham Ck, 7.7 N
of US212 Over Fordham Ck, 2.9 N
of Verdon Over a Ck.
Epoxy Chip SealBrown
Edmunds
Spink
0.0 SD37
US12
US12E
US12W
0.397 2018 0.484
791 NH-P 0013(41) 05KR Various Routes in the Huron Area Rout and SealClark
Hamlin
Spink
21.0 SD20
SD25
SD28
US212
US281
0.086 2018 0.105
792 BRO 8058(22) 05LY Structure 2.2N & 0.1E of Athol over
Snake Creek (162 St.) SN
58-061-140
Structure & Approach GradingSpink 0.2 0.316 2018 0.396
793 NH-P 0013(40) 05L1 Various Routes in the Huron Area Chip SealsBeadle
Clark
Hand
Hyde
Kingsbury
Spink
151.4 SD20
SD25
SD26
SD37
SD45
SD47
US14
US212
US281
4.334 2018 5.289
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
161
By County
¥¥
Stanley
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
794 NH 0083(84)96 04WP US83, US83N, US83S - Fm S of the
Lyman/Stanley Co Line to the
beginning of the concrete in Ft Pierre
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe WorkLyman
Stanley
22.3 US83
US83N
US83S
12.594 2016 15.621
795 NH-P 0034(174)115 055K SD34 - Fm the Meade/Ziebach
County Line to Pierre
Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Stanley
Ziebach
41.2 SD34
SD34E
SD34W
1.441 2017 1.758
796 P 1806(12)138 038Z SD1806 - Fm SD273 to East of
US83
Pipe Work & Erosion RepairLyman
Stanley
0.0 SD1806 3.757 2018 4.584
797 NH 0014(206)177 04V2 US14 - 1.9 N of the Haakon County
Line over Little Prairie Dog Creek;
7.8 S of SD34 over Prairie Dog
Creek; 4.2 S of SD34 over
Cottonwood Creek
Epoxy Chip SealStanley 0.0 US14 0.170 2018 0.207
798 NH 0083(77)115 045J US83 NBL & SBL - 1.5 Miles South
of the End Divided Lanes South of
Ft. Pierre
Slide RepairStanley 0.0 US83N
US83S
0.183 2018 0.235
799 NH 0031(35) 05KT Various Routes in the Pierre Area Rout and SealLyman
Potter
Stanley
52.0 US212
US83
US83N
US83S
0.213 2018 0.260
800 NH-P 0031(34) 05L4 Various Routes in the Pierre Area Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Hyde
Jackson
Potter
Stanley
Sully
93.6 SD1804
SD1806
SD34
SD47
SD73
2.685 2018 3.276
801 NH 0014( )202 05LL US14 - Fm Ft. Pierre W 24 Miles Micro-SurfacingStanley 23.3 US14 2.049 2018 2.500
802 NH 0014(209)190 04WK US14 - Fm SD34 to E of Hayes Mill & AC Resurfacing; Pipe WorkStanley 12.6 US14 4.326 2019 5.279
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
162
By County
¥¥
Stanley
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
803 P 1806(16)138 04XW SD1806 - Fm SD273 to East of
US83; SD1806 - Strs 11.2 SE of
US83 over Antelope Ck, 6.4 NW of
SD271 Over Cedar Ck,6.7 NW of
SD271 Over Straight Ck.
Mill & AC Resurfacing; Deck
Overlay, Approach Guardrail &
Erosion Repair
Lyman
Stanley
25.6 SD1806 5.600 2019 6.835
804 NH 0014(215)220 05DG US14 - Str 7.9 W of US83 Over
Willow Ck
Epoxy Chip SealStanley 0.0 US14 0.093 2019 0.114
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
163
By County
¥¥
Statewide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
805 P NBIS(37) 03A0 Statewide FY 2016 Bridge Inspection CostsStatewide 0.0 0.669 2016 0.816
FY 2017 Bridge Inspection Costs
806 LR 16CS( ) 04RF County Secondary STP Projects 2016 County Secondary STP
Projects Throughout SD
Statewide 0.0 0.001 2016 0.001
This project is simply a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed
and the estimated annual programmed amount.
807 P 00SW(00)10 04QW Statewide Right of Way AcquisitionStatewide 0.000 2016 1.000
808 BR NBIS(33) 03F0 Statewide Bridge Inspections, Scour AnalysisStatewide 0.0 1.680 2016 2.100
809 LR 16LU( ) 04RH Local Urban STP Projects 2016 Local Urban STP Projects
Throughout SD
Statewide 0.0 1.693 2016 2.067
This project is simply a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed
and the estimated annual programmed amount.
810 P 000S(318) 03AU Statewide Wetland Mitigation BankingStatewide 0.0 0.441 2016 0.490
811 P DBEC(21)16 03AS DBEC Certification Services
Statewide for CY2016
DBEC Certification Services
Statewide for CY2016
Statewide 0.0 0.062 2016 0.069
812 SS FY15(02) 03AT DBE Supportive Services for CY16 DBE Supportive Services for CY16Statewide 0.0 0.124 2016 0.139
813 SS FY16(03) 04LG On The Job Training and Support
Services (OJT/SS) Work Program
Anticipated funding for FY2016 On
The Job Training and Support
Services (OJT/SS) Work Program
Statewide 0.042 2016 0.046
814 NRT FY16(01) 03AV Statewide Various Recreation Trails ProjectsStatewide 0.0 0.983 2016 1.200
815 PS 000S(330) 04CT Statewide Inventory Compilation & AnalysisStatewide 0.0 0.037 2016 0.041
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
164
By County
¥¥
Statewide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
816 PS 000S(331) 04CU Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Railroad Safety Projects
Statewide 0.0 0.043 2016 0.048
817 PH 000S(294) 03B8 Public Traveled Roads Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Conducting Road Safety Audits
(RSA)
Statewide 0.0 0.028 2016 0.031
818 PH 000S(295) 03B9 Statewide Local Government Traffic
Engineering Services Performed
by the SDDOT Traffic & Safety
Engineer and Provide Traffic
Ccontrol Devices
Statewide 0.0 0.117 2016 0.117
819 PH 000S(296) 03BA Public Traveled Roads Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Roadway Safety Improvement
Statewide 0.0 0.119 2016 0.133
820 PH 000S(346) 04R0 Statewide Preliminary Engineering to be
Started in 2016 for Roadway
Safety Projects.
Statewide 0.0 1.318 2016 1.465
821 PH 00SW(27) 057C Various Locations Statewide Corridor Signal TimingStatewide 0.0 0.204 2016 0.204
822 PH 00SW(39) 05FW Various locations statewide Horizontal Curve DelineationStatewide 0.0 0.204 2016 0.204
823 PH 00SW(40) 05FX Various locations statewide Horizontal Curve Delineation on
Local System
Statewide 0.0 0.204 2016 0.204
824 PH 00SW(46) 05KW Statewide Promote Highway SafetyStatewide 0.0 0.918 2016 1.020
825 P 000S(320) 03U4 Statewide FY 2017 Bridge Inspection CostsStatewide 0.0 0.683 2017 0.832
826 LR 17CS( ) 04RG County Secondary STP Projects 2017 County Secondary STP
Projects Throughout SD
Statewide 0.0 0.001 2017 0.001
This project is simply a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed
and the estimated annual programmed amount.
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
165
By County
¥¥
Statewide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
827 P 00SW(00)11 04QX Statewide Right of Way AcquisitionStatewide 0.000 2017 1.000
828 BR NBIS(34) 03WU Statewide Bridge Inspections, Scour AnalysisStatewide 0.0 0.959 2017 1.200
829 LR 17LU( ) 04RJ Local Urban STP Projects 2017 Local Urban STP Projects
Throughout SD
Statewide 0.0 0.001 2017 0.001
This project is simply a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed
and the estimated annual programmed amount.
830 P 000S(321) 03WQ Statewide Wetland Mitigation BankingStatewide 0.0 0.441 2017 0.490
831 SS FY16(02) 03WT DBE Supportive Services for CY17 DBE Supportive Services for CY17Statewide 0.125 2017 0.138
832 P DBEC(22)17 03WR DBEC Certification Services
Statewide for CY2017
DBEC Certification Services
Statewide for CY2017
Statewide 0.062 2017 0.070
833 SS FY17(02) 04LH On The Job Training and Support
Services (OJT/SS) Work Program
Anticipated funding for FY2017 On
The Job Training and Support
Services (OJT/SS) Work Program
Statewide 0.0 0.047 2017 0.047
834 NRT FY17(01) 03WV Statewide Various Recreation Trails ProjectsStatewide 0.0 0.983 2017 1.200
835 PH 000S(317) 03V4 Public Traveled Roads Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Conducting Road Safety Audits
(RSA)
Statewide 0.0 0.028 2017 0.031
836 PH 000S(312) 03V0 Statewide Local Government Traffic
Engineering Services Performed
by the SDDOT Traffic & Safety
Engineer and Provide Traffic
Control Devices
Statewide 0.0 0.120 2017 0.120
837 PH 000S(314) 03V1 Public Traveled Roads Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Roadway Safety Improvement
Program
Statewide 0.0 0.122 2017 0.135
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
166
By County
¥¥
Statewide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
838 PH 000S(313) 03V9 Various Locations Statewide Curve DelineationStatewide 0.0 0.104 2017 0.104
839 PH 000S(315) 03VA Various Locations Statewide Guardrail ReplacementStatewide* 0.0 1.040 2017 1.040
840 PH 000S(347) 04R1 Statewide Preliminary Engineering to be
Started in 2017 for Roadway
Safety Projects.
Statewide 0.0 1.344 2017 1.494
841 PH 00SW(28) 057D Various Locations Statewide Corridor Signal TimingStatewide 0.0 0.208 2017 0.208
842 PH 00SW(42) 05H8 Varies Locations Statewide Centerline Rumble StripsStatewide 0.0 0.156 2017 0.156
843 PH 00SW(41) 05H7 Varies Locations Statewide Shoulder Wedge ImprovementsStatewide 0.0 1.873 2017 2.081
844 LR 2017(00)0 05K8 Various Locations Throughout South
Dakota
2017 Statewide Transportation
Alternative Program Projects
Statewide 0.0 1.401 2017 1.709
This project is a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed and the
estimated annual programmed amount.
845 LR 2017(00)0 05KA Various Locations Throughout South
Dakota
2017 Statewide Railroad Crossing
Projects
Statewide 0.0 1.282 2017 1.424
This project is a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed and the
estimated annual programmed amount.
846 P 000S(348)218 04G0 Statewide FY 2018 Bridge Inspection CostsStatewide 0.0 0.696 2018 0.849
847 LR 18CS( ) 050F County Secondary STP Projects 2018 County Secondary STP
Projects Throughout SD
Statewide 0.0 2.570 2018 3.137
This project is simply a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed
and the estimated annual programmed amount.
848 P 00SW(00)15 04YL Statewide Right of Way AcquisitionStatewide 0.000 2018 1.000
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
167
By County
¥¥
Statewide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
849 BR NBIS(36) 04M9 Statewide Bridge Inspections, Scour AnalysisStatewide 0.0 1.680 2018 2.100
850 LR 18LU( ) 050E Local Urban STP Projects 2018 Local Urban STP Projects
Throughout SD
Statewide 0.0 6.428 2018 7.843
This project is simply a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed
and the estimated annual programmed amount.
851 SS FY18(02) 04Y9 DBE Supportive Services for CY18 DBE Supportive Services for CY18Statewide 0.0 0.123 2018 0.137
852 P DBEC(23)18 04YA DBEC Certification Services
Statewide for CY2018
DBEC Certification Services
Statewide for CY2018
Statewide 0.0 0.063 2018 0.069
853 SS FY18(03) 04YC On The Job Training and Support
Services (OJT/SS) Work Program
Anticipated funding for FY2018 On
The Job Training and Support
Services (OJT/SS) Work Program
Statewide 0.039 2018 0.044
854 P 000S(349) 04YD Statewide Wetland Mitigation BankingStatewide 0.441 2018 0.490
855 NRT FY18(01) 04YE Statewide Various Recreation Trails ProjectsStatewide 0.983 2018 1.200
856 PH 000S(332) 04HD Public Traveled Roads Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Conducting Road Safety Audits
(RSA)
Statewide 0.0 0.029 2018 0.032
857 PH 000S(335) 04HC Statewide Local Government Traffic
Engineering Services Performed
by the SDDOT Traffic & Safety
Engineer and Provide Traffic
Ccontrol Devicess.
Statewide 0.0 0.122 2018 0.122
858 PH 000S(333) 04HE Public Traveled Roads Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Roadway Safety Improvement
Program
Statewide 0.0 0.124 2018 0.138
859 PH 000S(334) 04HG Various Locations Statewide Guardrail ReplacementStatewide* 0.0 1.061 2018 1.061
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
168
By County
¥¥
Statewide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
860 PH 000S(336) 04HH Various Locations Statewide Curve DelineationStatewide 0.0 0.106 2018 0.106
861 PH 000S(350) 04Y2 Statewide Preliiminary Engineering to be
Started in 2018 for Roadway
Safety Projects
Statewide 1.267 2018 1.408
862 PH 00SW(29) 057E Various Locations Statewide Corridor Signal TimingStatewide 0.0 0.212 2018 0.212
863 PH 00SW(43) 05H9 Varies locations statewide High Friction Surface TreatmentStatewide* 0.0 1.910 2018 2.122
864 PH 00SW(44) 05HC Varies Paved County and City
Roads Statewide
Signing & Delineation, PEStatewide 0.0 4.330 2018 4.330
865 LR 2018(0)0 05K9 Various Locations Throughout South
Dakota
2018 Statewide Transportation
Alternative Program Projects
Statewide 0.0 1.721 2018 2.100
This project is a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed and the
estimated annual programmed amount.
866 LR 2018(00)0 05KC Various Locations Throughout South
Dakota
2018 Statewide Railroad Crossing
Projects
Statewide 0.0 1.890 2018 2.100
This project is a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed and the
estimated annual programmed amount.
867 P NBIS(41) 04V6 Statewide FY 2019 Bridge Inspection CostsStatewide 0.710 2019 0.866
868 P 00SW(00)19 050K Statewide Right of Way AcquisitionStatewide 0.000 2019 1.000
869 BR NBIS(38) 04MA Statewide Bridge Inspections, Scour AnalysisStatewide 0.0 0.942 2019 1.177
870 NRT FY19(01) 0500 Statewide Various Recreation Trails ProjectsStatewide 0.983 2019 1.200
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
169
By County
¥¥
Statewide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
871 PH 000S(338) 04HY Public Traveled Roads Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Conducting Road Safety Audits
(RSA)
Statewide 0.0 0.029 2019 0.032
872 PH 000S(339) 04J0 Statewide Local Government Traffic
Engineering Services Performed
by the SDDOT Traffic & Safety
Engineer and Provide Traffic
Ccontrol Devices
Statewide 0.0 0.124 2019 0.124
873 PH 000S(342) 04J1 Public Traveled Roads Statewide Preliminary Engineering for
Roadway Safety Improvement
Statewide 0.0 0.127 2019 0.141
874 PH 000S(340) 04J2 Various Locations Statewide Guardrail ReplacementStatewide* 0.0 0.974 2019 1.082
875 PH 000S(341) 04J3 Various Locations Statewide Curve DelineationStatewide 0.0 0.108 2019 0.108
876 PH 00SW(25) 04Y3 Statewide Preliminary Engineering to be
Started in 2019 for Roadway
Safety Projects.
Statewide 1.364 2019 1.515
877 PH 00SW(30) 057F Various Locations Statewide Corridor Signal TimingStatewide 0.0 0.216 2019 0.216
878 LR 2019( ) 05GR Structure Preservation Projects
Throughout South Dakota
2019 Structure PreservationStatewide 0.0 1.774 2019 2.165
This project is a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed and the
estimated annual programmed amount.
879 SS FY19(02) 05HH DBE Supportive Services for CY19 DBE Supportive Services for CY19Statewide 0.0 0.126 2019 0.140
880 P DBEC(24)19 05HJ DBEC Certification Services
Statewide for CY2019
DBEC Certification Services
Statewide for CY2019
Statewide 0.0 0.064 2019 0.070
881 SS FY19(03) 05HK On The Job Training and Support
Services (OJT/SS) Work Program
Anticipated funding for FY2019 On
The Job Training and Support
Services (OJT/SS) Work Program
Statewide 0.0 0.040 2019 0.044
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
170
By County
¥¥
Statewide
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
882 P 00SW(45) 05HL Statewide Wetland Mitigation BankingStatewide 0.0 0.487 2019 0.541
883 LR 2019(00)0 05K7 2019 Pavement Preservation
Projects Throughout South Dakota
Pavement PreservationStatewide 0.0 36.877 2019 45.000
This project is a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed and the
estimated annual programmed amount.
884 LR 2019(00)0 05KD Various Locations Throughout South
Dakota
2019 Statewide Transportation
Alternative Program Projects
Statewide 0.0 1.721 2019 2.100
This project is a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed and the
estimated annual programmed amount.
885 LR 2019(00)0 05K6 Various Locations Throughout South
Dakota
2019 Statewide Railroad Crossing
Projects
Statewide 0.0 1.890 2019 2.100
This project is a "funding placeholder" to show any difference between the total amount programmed and the
estimated annual programmed amount.
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
171
By County
¥¥
Sully
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
886 P 1804(42)269 03A9 SD1804 - 5.2 N of the Hughes Co
Line over Okobojo Creek
Epoxy Chip SealSully 0.0 SD1804 0.073 2016 0.090
887 P 6026(07) 04LT From US83 at Onida, E 7 mi. on 185
St. to 311 Ave.
Chip Seal, Fog CoatSully 7.0 0.263 2018 0.322
888 BRF 6154(07) 05M1 Structure 6.2W of Onida over a
creek SN 60-253-130
Structure & Approach GradingSully 0.2 0.327 2018 0.409
889 NH-P 0031(34) 05L4 Various Routes in the Pierre Area Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Hyde
Jackson
Potter
Stanley
Sully
93.6 SD1804
SD1806
SD34
SD47
SD73
2.685 2018 3.276
890 NH 0031(36) 05LG Various Routes in the Pierre Area Joint and Spall RepairHughes
Sully
27.0 US83 2.594 2018 3.164
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
172
By County
¥¥
Todd
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
891 PH 0083(70)0 03B2 US83 - From the Nebraska State
Line to south of Mission
Shoulder Widening, Spot Grading
& AC Surfacing of Shoulders
Todd* 12.4 US83 8.093 2016 8.093
892 P 0ENH(173) 01EV Pedestrian Path from Rosebud
Casino to Sicangu Village
Bike Trail PE & ConstructionTodd 0.0 0.254 2016 0.510
893 NH 0018(176)206 039G
NH 0083(71)21 039J
US18 & US83 in Mission; W
US18/US83 Jct
Urban Grading, PCC Surfacing,
Storm Sewer, Curb & Gutter, ADA
Upgrades, Sidewalk, Traffic
Signals, Roadway Lighting;
Intersection Lighting
Todd* 2.5 US18
US83
11.746 2017 14.991
894 P 6497(04) 02DN Fm 2N & 7W of Olsonville, S 4 mi.
on 269 Ave. between 293 St. & 297
St.
Heavy Roadway Shaping, Base
Course, Gravel Surfacing,
Magnesium Chloride
Todd 4.0 0.617 2018 0.752
895 NH 0033(26) 05LK Various Routes in the Winner Area Joint and Spall RepairBennett
Todd
45.7 US18 4.392 2018 5.360
896 NH 0083(82)25 03RR US83 - Fm the W Jct of US18 to the
N Jct of SD44
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Drainage
Improvement, Bridge Berm Repair
Mellette
Todd
18.4 US83 5.688 2019 7.106
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
173
By County
¥¥
Tripp
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
897 P 6139(09) 04LK
P 6302(03) 04LL
From 0.6S of US 18 in Winner, S
17.5 mi. on 315 Ave. to 296 St. (FA
6139); From 310 Ave., 5W of Jct. of
296 St./315 Ave., E 11 mi. to
US183/321 Ave. (FA 6302)
Crack Seal, Patching, Chip Seal,
Fog Coat
Tripp 28.5 1.074 2016 1.311
898 BRF 6301(05) 6749 0.1 E & 1 N of Millboro Over
Keyapaha River
Structure & Approach GradingTripp 0.2 0.428 2016 0.536
899 BRF 6140(08) 01DX Structure 2.9N of Witten over
Cottonwood Creek
Structure & Approach GradingTripp 0.2 0.252 2017 0.315
900 PH 6139(10) 04Q1 Intersection of 315th Avenue and
289th Street in Tripp County Straight
south of Winner
PE, CE, ROW, Spot Grading &
AC Resurfacing
Tripp 0.0 0.378 2017 0.616
901 P 0248(10)239 03TY
P 0183(24)61 03U0
SD248 - Str 0.1 E of US183 Over a
Creek; US183 - Str at the
Tripp/Lyman Co Line Over the White
River
Replace Structure (RCBC) &
Approach Grading; Replace
Structure (Bridge) & Approach
Grading
Lyman
Tripp
1.1 SD248
US183
3.987 2018 5.036
902 NH 0083(75)39 03UE
NH 0018(183)247 03UF
NH 0183(22)2 03UG
P 0044(181)257 03UH
P 0047(106)52 03UJ
P 0049(04)35 03UK
US83 - Str.s 2.3 S of SD44E Over a
creek & 3.1 N of the Mellette Co Line
Over Horse Ck; US18 - Str.s 3.9 E of
US183 Over Big Hollow Ck & 2 SE
of Winner Over W Branch of
Thunder Ck; US183 - Str 2.2 N Of
the Neb State Line Over the Keya
Paha River; SD44 - Str 4 E of US18
Over Thunder Ck; SD47 - Str 5.3 S
of SD49 Over Bull Ck; SD49 - Str 7
S oh Hamill Over a creek
Scour Protection and/or Column
Repair
Lyman
Mellette
Tripp
0.0 SD44
SD47
SD49
US18
US183
US83
0.832 2018 1.017
903 P 0183(25)02 04FQ US183 - 2.2 mi N of the Nebraska
State Line Over the Keya Paha
River
Epoxy Chip SealTripp 0.0 US183 0.083 2018 0.101
904 P 0044(192)254 03RX
P 0049(05)27 04F4
SD44 - Fm Winner to the Jct. with
SD49; SD49 - Fm SD44 North 14 Mi
SD44 - Process in Place, AC
Resurfacing, Pipe Work; SD49 -
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe Work
Tripp 6.9 SD44
SD49
7.665 2018 9.355
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
174
By County
¥¥
Tripp
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
905 NH-P 0033(25) 05L8 Various Routes in the Winner Area Chip SealBennett
Jackson
Tripp
31.9 SD44
SD73
US18
US18E
US18W
0.755 2018 0.920
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
175
By County
¥¥
Turner
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
906 P 6358(03) 6857 From 5S of Jct. of SD19/SD44 at
Parker on 454 Ave., E 10 mi. on 280
St. (Co. Rd 32)
AC ResurfacingTurner 10.0 1.563 2016 2.920
Total = $2.92; STP/Match thru '17 = $1.908; SIB = $1.012
907 PH 8063(14) 02UE Various County, City, and Township
Roads in Turner County
Signing & Delineation, PETurner 0.0 1.455 2016 1.455
908 PH 0020(139) 04GP Mitchell Region Intersection ImprovementsClay
Lincoln
McCook
Minnehaha
Moody
Turner
1.5 SD11
SD115
SD19
SD34
SD42
SD44
US81
0.459 2016 0.510
909 P TAPR(15) 05CG Centerville - Along North St. from
Lincoln Ave. west across the
Vermillion River and north to
Gunderson Park
Shared Use Path ConstructionTurner 0.4 0.064 2016 0.078
910 BRF 6355(09) 01W8 Structure 0.9N of Marion over the
West Fork of the Vermillion River
(447 St)
Structure & Approach GradingTurner 0.2 0.605 2016 0.756
911 P TAPR(05) 04QD In Centerville, Along the North Side
of North St. from Lincoln Ave. to
Gunderson Park.
Shared Use Path ConstructionTurner* 0.6 0.212 2016 0.259
912 NH-P 0022(54) 055Q Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area.
Chip SealLake
Turner
15.0 SD19
SD34
SD34E
SD34W
0.640 2017 0.780
913 NH-P 0023(47) 055U Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Charles Mix
Hutchinson
Turner
Union
58.6 SD11
SD37
SD37P
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
SD50W
2.051 2017 2.502
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
176
By County
¥¥
Turner
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
914 NH-PH
0018(180)420
036A US18 - From SD19 to I29 Shoulder Widening, Str
Replacement (RCBC), Pipe Work,
Berm Repair & Scour Protection
Lincoln
Turner
* 14.5 US18 10.901 2018 10.998
915 BRF 6358(04) 01WJ Structure 3S & 1.7W of Chancellor
over the Vermillion River
Structure & Approach GradingTurner 0.2 0.845 2018 1.056
916 NH 0018(179)402 036L US18 - Fm US81 to SD19 Grading, Str. (Bridge) & Interim
Surfacing
Hutchinson
Turner
* 17.0 US18 17.928 2018 22.865
917 NH-P 0022(60) 05L6 Various Routes in the Sioux Falls
Area
Chip SealLake
Lincoln
Miner
Minnehaha
Turner
48.0 SD11
SD19
SD34
SD44
1.362 2018 1.662
918 P 0018(185)402 036W US18 - Fm US81 to SD19; US18 -
Fm SD19 to I29
AC Surfacing; Mill & AC
Resurfacing
Hutchinson
Lincoln
Turner
* 31.6 US18 9.626 2019 12.022
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
177
By County
¥¥
Union
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
919 IM 0291(122)0 02PT I29 - Strs, N Sioux City Interchange
Over River Street; Over the Big
Sioux River @ the Iowa Border; I29P
over I29, 1.9 N of N Sioux City Intch;
SD50 over I29; 0.4 S of the SD48
Intch Over a Creek; 6.0 N of the
SD46 Intch Over I29
Deck Overlay, Approach Slabs and
Approach Guardrail Epoxy Chip
Seal, Abutment & Column Repr &
Joint Modification, Approach
Repairs
Lincoln
Union
0.0 I29N
I29S
2.073 2016 2.279
920 IM 0291(126)1 03RK I29 - Exit 1 (Dakota Dunes) Traffic Signal, ADA UpgradesUnion 0.0 0.135 2016 0.296
921 BRF 6397(03) 01DY Structure 4W & 2S of Alcester over
E. Brule Creek
Structure & Approach GradingUnion 0.2 0.542 2016 0.677
922 BRO 8064(27) 01DZ Structure 10.9S of Beresford over
Brule Creek
Structure & Approach GradingUnion 0.2 0.697 2016 0.871
923 IM-P 0023(44) 052V Various Routes in the Yankton Area Joint and Spall RepairClay
Lincoln
Union
Yankton
15.4 I29N
I29S
SD19
SD50
SD50EL
SD50L
SD50WL
SD52
1.651 2016 2.016
924 P SRTS(38) 04NW Elk Point P.E., Non Infrastructure and
Construct New Sidewalk
Union 0.0 0.200 2016 0.200
925 IM 0291(121)35 02PR
P 0048(09)375 02PS
I29 - Str, 4.5 Mi N of SD48 Over a
Creek; SD48 - Str, 3.8 Mi E of I29
Over a Creek
Scour ProtectionUnion 0.0 I29N
SD48
0.247 2017 0.285
926 NH-P 0050(97)411 023L
P 0050(102)417 037D
P 050L(02)411 05CL
SD50/SD50 EBL - Fm Vermillion to
I29; SD50 - Fm I29 to SD11;
SD50EL and SD50WL- SD50 Loop
at Vermillion
Mill & AC Resurfacing, Pipe Work,
Culvert Rehab/Repair
Clay
Union
11.9 SD50
SD50E
SD50EL
SD50WL
4.032 2017 5.074
SD50 & SD50 E - Fm Vermillion to I29
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
178
By County
¥¥
Union
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
927 P 0023(34) 03JL Various Routes in the Yankton Area GrindingClay
Union
Yankton
8.6 I29N
I29S
SD46
US81
US81N
US81S
0.985 2017 1.203
928 NH-P 0023(47) 055U Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Charles Mix
Hutchinson
Turner
Union
58.6 SD11
SD37
SD37P
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
SD50W
2.051 2017 2.502
929 PH 8064(29) 02UL Various County, City, & Township
Roads in Union County
Signing & Delineation, PEUnion 0.0 1.089 2017 1.089
930 PH 0046(65)373 04HF Jct SD11/SD46 Intersection ImprovementsLincoln
Union
0.4 SD11
SD46
1.371 2017 1.523
931 P 0011(89)38 04V3 SD11 - 0.5 South of SD 46 over East
Brule Creek
Epoxy Chip SealUnion 0.0 SD11 0.081 2018 0.099
932 IM 0291(124)26 03RJ Homestead Rest Area Near
Vermillion
Rest Area ModificationsUnion 0.0 I29N
I29S
3.151 2019 3.464
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
179
By County
¥¥
Walworth
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
933 P 1806(06)365 02A7
NH 0012(152)187 02A6
NH 0212(149)208 02A8
SD1806 - 0.4 mi N of US12; US12 -
Missouri River Bridge at Mobridge;
US212 - Missouri River Bridge at
Forest City
Substructure WorkCorson
Potter
Walworth
0.0 SD1806
US12
US212
2.692 2016 3.060
934 NH 0012(190)212 04W9
NH 0083(83)205 053U
US12 - Fm 2 mi S of Selby through
Bowdle; US83 - Fm US12 to end of
the divided section
Mill & AC Resurfacing; Pipe WorkEdmunds
Walworth
21.3 US12
US12E
US12W
US83N
US83S
6.913 2016 8.634
935 NH-P 0032(25) 053G Various Locations in the Mobridge
Area
Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Dewey
McPherson
Potter
Walworth
115.7 SD10
SD130
SD1804
SD20
SD271
SD65
US12
US83
3.869 2016 4.721
936 NH-P 0032(27) 055J Various Routes in the Mobridge Area Chip SealCampbell
Corson
Walworth
53.3 SD1804
SD65
US12
US83
1.978 2017 2.414
937 P 1804(46)349 04FM SD1804 - 0.5 mi S of US12 over
Blue Blanket Creek
Epoxy Chip SealWalworth 0.0 SD1804 0.075 2018 0.092
938 P 1804(45)357 0397 SD1804 - Fm N of Mobridge to
Pollock
Mill & AC Resurfacing; Str Rail
Retrofit
Campbell
Walworth
35.2 SD1804 5.996 2018 7.488
939 NH-P 0011(105) 05KQ Various Routes in the Aberdeen
Area
Rout and SealBrown
Day
Edmunds
Walworth
31.9 SD37
US12
US12E
US12W
US83N
US83S
0.145 2018 0.177
940 P 0020(145)240 03T1 SD20 - Fm US83 to Hoven Mill & AC Resurfacing; Pipe WorkWalworth 13.2 SD20 2.236 2019 2.792
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
180
By County
¥¥
Yankton
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
941 IM-P 0023(44) 052V Various Routes in the Yankton Area Joint and Spall RepairClay
Lincoln
Union
Yankton
15.4 I29N
I29S
SD19
SD50
SD50EL
SD50L
SD50WL
SD52
1.651 2016 2.016
942 NH-P 0023(45) 053L Various Locations in the Yankton
Area
Chip SealBon Homme
Hutchinson
Yankton
21.3 SD37P
SD44
SD52
0.767 2016 0.936
943 PH 8068(12) 04R6 Various County, City, and Township
Roads in Yankton County
Signing & Delineation, PEYankton 0.0 1.206 2016 1.206
944 P TAPU(12) 05C8 Yankton - Along SD50 from WalMart
access to Adkins Dr. and along
Adkins Drive from SD50 to 30th St.
Shared Use Path / Sidewalk
Construction
Yankton 0.6 0.364 2016 0.579
945 NH 0050(123)390 05HE SD50E - Str 6.2 E of US81 Over
the James River
Replace Approach SlabsYankton 0.0 SD50E 0.204 2016 0.249
946 NH 0050(122)384 05HD SD50 - Fm Marne Creek to Archery
Lane in Yankton; SD50 - Str 0.8 E of
US81 over Marne Creek
Urban Grading, Roadway Lighting,
Storm Sewer, Curb & Gutter,
Sidewalk, PCC Surfacing; Deck
Overlay, Approach Slabs,
Approach Guardrail, Berm Repair
& Riprap
Yankton 0.9 SD50 5.236 2016 6.388
947 NH 0050(108)385 023U SD50, SD50 E & W - Fm Yankton to
the beginning of the divided lanes
east of Yankton & SD50 - WBL, Fm
east of Yankton to west of Gayville;
Str Over the James River
PCC Surfacing; Approach Slabs,
Structure Approach Modification
Yankton* 8.8 SD50
SD50E
SD50W
7.644 2017 9.548
948 P 0023(34) 03JL Various Routes in the Yankton Area GrindingClay
Union
Yankton
8.6 I29N
I29S
SD46
US81
US81N
US81S
0.985 2017 1.203
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
181
By County
¥¥
Yankton
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
949 NH-P 0023(48) 056K Various Routes in the Yankton Area Rout and SealBon Homme
Clay
Hutchinson
Yankton
48.7 SD314
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
0.201 2017 0.246
950 NH 0081(101)01 04FP US81 - 0.4 mi N of SD50 over Marne
Creek
Epoxy Chip SealYankton 0.0 US81 0.121 2018 0.148
951 BRO 8068(14) 04N3 Structure 5.3N & 0.2E of Volin, on
301 St., over Turkey Creek SN
68-232-097
Structure & Approach GradingYankton 0.2 0.264 2018 0.330
952 BRO 8068(13) 04N4 Structure 3N & 2.3W of Irene, on
294 St., over a drainage ditch SN
68-217-030
Structure & Approach GradingYankton 0.2 0.244 2018 0.305
953 NH 0081(88)15 023Z
PH 0081(107)8 05F7
US81 - Fm SD46 to N of Freeman;
US81 - Intersection with 304th St
and 303rd St
Crack & Seat & AC Overlay;
Construct Left and Right turn
lanes; Crack & Seat and AC
Overlay
Hutchinson
Yankton
19.6 US81 8.683 2018 10.772
954 NH 0081(108)0 05FM US81 - Discovery Bridge at Yankton Epoxy Chip Seal (SD Share of the
bridge)
Yankton 0.0 US81 0.233 2018 0.285
955 NH-P 0023(49) 05L9 Various Routes in the Yankton Area Chip SealBon Homme
Clay
Hutchinson
Yankton
68.0 SD19
SD314
SD37
SD44
SD46
SD50
SD50E
US18
1.949 2018 2.379
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
182
By County
¥¥
Ziebach
Seq Location of Project Type of ImprovementProject Number PC # County Length RouteFederal
Funds
Fiscal
YearTotal
Cost(Mil $)
956 NH 0012(175)106 03UA
NH 0212(161)135 03UC
P 0063(46)146 03UD
P 0063(45)144 03WC
US12 - Str.s 6.7 E of the Perkins Co
Line Over Hay Ck; US212 - Str.s 0.5
W of Dupree Over Bear Ck; SD63 -
Str 1.7 N of the Haakon Co Line
Over Dupree Ck; SD63 - Str 0.5 S of
the Ziebach/Haakon Co Line Over
Hermaphrodite Ck
Scour ProtectionCorson
Haakon
Ziebach
0.0 SD63
US12
US212
0.488 2017 0.511
957 NH-P 0034(174)115 055K SD34 - Fm the Meade/Ziebach
County Line to Pierre
Chip SealHaakon
Hughes
Stanley
Ziebach
41.2 SD34
SD34E
SD34W
1.441 2017 1.758
958 P 0065(16)164 04F1 SD65 - Fm US212 to SD20 AC Resurfacing, Mill & AC
Resurfacing, Fault Repair
Ziebach 25.2 SD65 6.016 2017 7.525
¥ Costs reflect anticipated inflation HC65Coding.rpt
183
184
185
186
187
188
INDIAN ROADS RESERVATION PROGRAMCSTIPS Module of ITIMS
Cheyenne River Report
The CSTIP report shows the full contents of one or more CSTIPS.For example, if the report is requested for a particular reservation with a managing entity that also manages two other reservations, then projects for allthree reservations are reported. This means that subtotal amounts are always correct, no matter what the filter might be. However, see the next remark onhow to read subtotals.
The CSTIP Subtotal is the full total for values on the CSTIP.The state subtotal is the sum of the values in the state and on the current CSTIP. This report does not show overall state totals.The location subtotal is the sum of values for projects on a particular reservation and in a particular state. When a reservation lies in two states, project datafor each part including the subtotal is presented in separate places.
Any type of CSTIP may be the subject of the report.
189
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
19-AUG-2015 12:50 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 2 of 4
A0100063
A0100064
A0100220
A0100387
A0137800
A0138600
381,000
445,000
50,000
47,000
383,375
0
1,085,000
0
0
0
0
0
1,065,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,911,000
890,000
100,000
94,000
383,375
38,300
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
73,000 263,000
30,000 15,000
78,000 317,000
30,000 20,000
29,000 18,500
1,000 1,500
11,000 30,000
6,000 0
6,000 365,000
11,000 1,375
0 0 0 0
0 1,030,000
30,000 25,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1,000,000
30,000 35,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
73,000 2,628,000
120,000 90,000
78,000 712,000
60,000 40,000
29,000 63,500
5,000 2,500
11,000 65,000 18,000
0
6,000 365,000
11,000 1,375
8,500 29,800
0 0
CULVERT REPLACEMENT RESERVATION
FEMA Road Repair and Culver tReplacem
Moreau river encroachment ob BIA 3
Hawk Eagle pathway lighting
Multi-Route Graveling Project
HAWK EAGLE PATHWAY PH II
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
REPLACE
REHAB
RECONS
WALKWY
RECONS
WALKWY
O
R
R
O
R
R
C3
C4
2
P6
3
6
46 - South DakotaState A01340 - Cheyenne River
041 - Dewey
041 - Dewey
041 - Dewey
041 - Dewey
041 - Dewey
041 - Dewey
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
61EProgram Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearCS 2015
Funding Amount 2,435,875
FIRST PAGE FOR CSTIPA01340 - Cheyenne RiverEntity Name
0 335,000
30,000 15,000
0 395,000
30,000 20,000
0 45,000
4,000 1,000
0 35,000 12,000
0
0 0 0 0
8,500 29,800
0 0
380,000
445,000
50,000
47,000
0
38,300
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
190
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
19-AUG-2015 12:50 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 3 of 4
2,435,875 2,456,175 2,442,500 2,207,500 1,102,500 10,644,550
10,644,550
2,435,875 2,456,175 2,442,500 2,207,500 1,102,500 10,644,550
A0141300
A0162700
A0183102
A01AC551
A01RM550
A01TR552
25,000
0
2,000
295,000
575,000
232,500
0
255,000
0
295,000
575,000
232,500
0
10,000
30,000
295,000
575,000
232,500
0
0
0
295,000
575,000
232,500
25,000
648,375
42,000
1,475,000
2,875,000
1,162,500
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
PECONS
CEZ
19,500 1,000 4,000
500
0 0 0 0
1,000 0 0
1,000
0 0 0
295,000
0 0 0
575,000
0 0
232,500 0
0 0 0 0
0 220,000
25,000 10,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
295,000
0 0 0
575,000
0 0
232,500 0
0 0 0 0
0 10,000
0 0
10,000 0 0
20,000
0 0 0
295,000
0 0 0
575,000
0 0
232,500 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
295,000
0 0 0
575,000
0 0
232,500 0
19,500 1,000 4,000
500
29,000 555,000
44,375 20,000
16,000 0 0
26,000
0 0 0
1,475,000
0 0 0
2,875,000
0 0
1,162,500 0
MULTI-ROUTE BLACK TOP STRIPING
BIA 12 Cherry Creek east slide
INVENTORY UPDATE
TTP ADMINISTRATION
CRST ROAD MAINTENANCE 23 USC 204
CRST Transit Operations
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
2,435,875 2,456,175 2,442,500 2,207,500
SAFETY
RECONS
PLANING
PLANING
SAFETY
TRANSIT
O
R
O
O
O
O
P2
2
P8
P10
T3
T4
46 - South DakotaState A01340 - Cheyenne River
041 - Dewey
137 - Ziebach
137 - Ziebach
041 - Dewey
041 - Dewey
041 - Dewey
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
Location Subtotal
State Subtotal
CSTIP Subtotal
61EProgram Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearCS 2015
Funding Amount 2,435,875
A01340 - Cheyenne RiverEntity Name
1,102,500
0 0 0 0
29,000 325,000
19,375 10,000
5,000 0 0
5,000
0 0 0
295,000
0 0 0
575,000
0 0
232,500 0
0
383,375
10,000
295,000
575,000
232,500
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2018 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
FY 2019 ($)
191
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
19-AUG-2015 12:50 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 4 of 4
2,435,875 2,456,175 2,442,500 2,207,500 1,102,500 10,644,550Report Total
192
193
194
INDIAN ROADS RESERVATION PROGRAMCSTIPS Module of ITIMS
Crow Creek
The CSTIP report shows the full contents of one or more CSTIPS.For example, if the report is requested for a particular reservation with a managing entity that also manages two other reservations, then projects for all threereservations are reported. This means that subtotal amounts are always correct, no matter what the filter might be. However, see the next remark on how toread subtotals.
The CSTIP Subtotal is the full total for values on the CSTIP.The state subtotal is the sum of the values in the state and on the current CSTIP. This report does not show overall state totals.The location subtotal is the sum of values for projects on a particular reservation and in a particular state. When a reservation lies in two states, project datafor each part including the subtotal is presented in separate places.
Any type of CSTIP may be the subject of the report.
195
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:59 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 2 of 3
A1442700
A1445000
A1445500
A1462500
A1481000
A1483101
16,000
0
0
92,457
350,000
10,000
0
0
474,000
0
0
0
0
0
474,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16,000
398,500
989,000
92,457
350,000
10,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
0 16,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
15,000 77,457
0 0
10,000 340,000
0 0
0 0
10,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
35,000 430,000
0 9,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
35,000 430,000
0 9,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 16,000
0 0
50,000 325,000 13,500 10,000
70,000 860,000 41,000 18,000
15,000 77,457
0 0
10,000 340,000
0 0
0 0
10,000 0
MULTI-ROUTE STRIPING
BAD NATION NORTH
ROUTE 14 REHAB
SHELBY ROAD
BIA 4 Emergency Road Repairs
Inventory Update
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
SAFETY
RECONS
REHAB
OVRLAY
REHAB
PLANING
O
R
R
R
R
O
P2
7
7
7
D1
P8
46 - South DakotaState A14342 - Crow Creek
017 - Buffalo
017 - Buffalo
017 - Buffalo
017 - Buffalo
017 - Buffalo
017 - Buffalo
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
31EProgram Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2012
Funding Amount 473,457
FIRST PAGE FOR CSTIPA14342 - Crow CreekEntity Name
0 0 0 0
50,000 325,000 13,500 10,000
0 0
41,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
398,500
41,000
0
0
0
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
13-SEP-12
196
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:59 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 3 of 3
473,457 440,500 475,000 475,000 1,000 1,864,957
473,457 440,500 475,000 475,000 1,000 1,864,957
1,864,957
473,457 440,500 475,000 475,000 1,000 1,864,957
A1483102
A14RM550 5,000
0
0
1,000
0
1,000
0
1,000
5,000
4,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
0 0
5,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
1,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
1,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
1,000
0 0
5,000 0
0 0 0
4,000
Long Range Transportation Plan
ROAD MAINTENANCE 23 USC 204 (C)
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
473,457 440,500 475,000 475,000
PLANING
PLANING
O
R
P9
T1
46 - South DakotaState A14342 - Crow Creek
017 - Buffalo
017 - Buffalo
Name
Name
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
Location Subtotal
State Subtotal
CSTIP Subtotal
Report Total
31EProgram Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2012
Funding Amount 473,457
A14342 - Crow CreekEntity Name
1,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
1,000
0
1,000
Total
Total
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
13-SEP-12
197
198
199
200
INDIAN ROADS RESERVATION PROGRAMCSTIPS Module of ITIMS
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe
The CSTIP report shows the full contents of one or more CSTIPS.For example, if the report is requested for a particular reservation with a managing entity that also manages two other reservations, then projects for all threereservations are reported. This means that subtotal amounts are always correct, no matter what the filter might be. However, see the next remark on how toread subtotals.
The CSTIP Subtotal is the full total for values on the CSTIP.The state subtotal is the sum of the values in the state and on the current CSTIP. This report does not show overall state totals.The location subtotal is the sum of values for projects on a particular reservation and in a particular state. When a reservation lies in two states, project datafor each part including the subtotal is presented in separate places.
Any type of CSTIP may be the subject of the report.
201
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:53 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 2 of 3
171,339 184,500 174,000 185,000 155,000 869,839
869,839
171,339 184,500 174,000 185,000 155,000 869,839
A0327000
A0328000
A0331000
A0383101
A0383102
A03RM550
0
87,787
58,552
15,000
5,000
5,000
0
169,000
0
0
0
5,000
20,000
160,000
0
0
0
5,000
150,000
0
0
0
0
5,000
170,000
596,287
58,552
15,000
5,000
25,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
0 0 0 0
1,000 56,644 29,143 1,000
5,000 40,000 8,552 5,000
0 0
13,500 1,500
0 0
4,500 500
0 0 0
5,000
0 0 0 0
3,000 161,000
0 5,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
5,000
0 0
20,000 0
5,000 152,500
0 2,500
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
5,000
5,000 140,000
0 5,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
5,000
5,000 140,000 20,000 5,000
19,000 485,144 73,643 18,500
5,000 40,000 8,552 5,000
0 0
13,500 1,500
0 0
4,500 500
0 0 0
25,000
CENTER STREET EXTENSION
THREE MILE ROAD
BROAD AVE REALIGNMENT
Flandreau Inventory Update
Flandreau Long Range Transportation Pl
ROAD MAINTENANCE 23 USC 204 C
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
171,339 184,500 174,000 185,000
NEWCON
RECONS
RECONS
PLANING
PLANING
PLANING
R
R
R
O
O
O
7
7
7
P8
P9
T1
46 - South DakotaState A03341 - Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe
101 - Moody
101 - Moody
101 - Moody
101 - Moody
101 - Moody
101 - Moody
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
Location Subtotal
State Subtotal
CSTIP Subtotal
651Program Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2013
Funding Amount 171,339
FIRST PAGE FOR CSTIPA03341 - FlandreauEntity Name
155,000
0 0 0 0
10,000 115,000 44,500 10,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
5,000
0
179,500
0
0
0
5,000
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
26-MAR-13
202
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:53 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 3 of 3
171,339 184,500 174,000 185,000 155,000 869,839Report Total
203
204
205
206
INDIAN ROADS RESERVATION PROGRAMCSTIPS Module of ITIMS
Lower Brule
The CSTIP report shows the full contents of one or more CSTIPS.For example, if the report is requested for a particular reservation with a managing entity that also manages two other reservations, then projects for all threereservations are reported. This means that subtotal amounts are always correct, no matter what the filter might be. However, see the next remark on how toread subtotals.
The CSTIP Subtotal is the full total for values on the CSTIP.The state subtotal is the sum of the values in the state and on the current CSTIP. This report does not show overall state totals.The location subtotal is the sum of values for projects on a particular reservation and in a particular state. When a reservation lies in two states, project datafor each part including the subtotal is presented in separate places.
Any type of CSTIP may be the subject of the report.
207
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 03:00 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 2 of 3
A1510400
A1511000
A1542800
A1564400
A1564500
A1564600
467,264
2,000
14,000
0
0
0
465,000
0
0
47,000
13,000
0
465,000
0
0
6,000
32,000
19,500
465,000
0
0
1,555,000
10,500
59,500
2,327,264
2,000
14,000
1,625,500
55,500
79,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
0 467,264
0 0
500 0 0
1,500
0 14,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 465,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
46,000 1,000
0 0
12,500 500
0 0 0 0
0 465,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
5,000 1,000
0 0
31,000 1,000
0 0
18,500 1,000
0 465,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
100,000 1,305,000
0 150,000
0 0
10,000 500
0 0
58,500 1,000
0 2,327,264
0 0
500 0 0
1,500
0 14,000
0 0
100,000 1,305,000
68,000 152,500
0 0
53,500 2,000
0 0
77,000 2,000
FARM ROAD RECONSTRUCTION
LOWER BRULE PATHWAY
MULTI-ROUTE STRIPING
BIA 10 W BRULE TO TRIBAL ADMIN BL
BIA 10 MEDICINE CREEK GRADE RAIS
BIA 10 W BRULE TO MEDICINE CREEK
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
NEWCON
WALKWY
SAFETY
RECONS
RECONS
RECONS
R
R
O
R
R
R
7
6
P2
7
7
7
46 - South DakotaState A15343 - Lower Brule
085 - Lyman
085 - Lyman
085 - Lyman
085 - Lyman
085 - Lyman
085 - Lyman
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
31EProgram Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2012
Funding Amount 633,264
FIRST PAGE FOR CSTIPA15343 - Lower BruleEntity Name
0 465,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
17,000 500
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
465,000
0
0
17,500
0
0
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
29-MAY-12
208
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 03:00 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 3 of 3
633,264 637,555 680,055 677,555 2,275,055 4,903,484
633,264 637,555 680,055 677,555 2,275,055 4,903,484
4,903,484
633,264 637,555 680,055 677,555 2,275,055 4,903,484
A1564700
A1583101
A1583102
A15RM550
0
10,000
5,000
135,000
0
0
0
155,055
0
0
0
155,055
30,000
0
0
155,055
30,000
10,000
5,000
755,220
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
0 0 0 0
0 0
8,500 1,500
0 0
4,500 500
0 0 0
135,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
155,055
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
155,055
0 0
30,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
155,055
0 0
30,000 0
0 0
8,500 1,500
0 0
4,500 500
0 0 0
755,220
BIA 10 MEDICINE CREEK TO KENNEB
Lower Brule Inventory Update
Lower Brule Long Range Transportation
ROAD MAINTENANCE 23 USC 204 (C)
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
633,264 637,555 680,055 677,555
OVRLAY
PLANING
PLANING
SAFETY
R
O
O
O
6
P8
P9
T3
46 - South DakotaState A15343 - Lower Brule
085 - Lyman
085 - Lyman
085 - Lyman
085 - Lyman
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
Location Subtotal
State Subtotal
CSTIP Subtotal
Report Total
31EProgram Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2012
Funding Amount 633,264
A15343 - Lower BruleEntity Name
2,275,055
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
155,055
0
0
0
155,055
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2012 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
29-MAY-12
209
210
211
212
Transportation Improvement ProgramOglala Sioux Tribe
Construction Year 2014Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
IRRBP & County/SDDOT
2656BRF 6488(01)
Custer 0.1 5 miles west of the Pine Ridge Reservation Line
Construction of New Bridge $1,000,000
Jointly funded with $1,000,000 IRRBP funds matched with a minimum of 20% Custer County funding. The remainder of the funding will be obtained by Custer County thru SDDOT and
Comments:Custer County Structure #17-496-252 Cheyenne River
Multiple* 141 and 14210612111 Shannon 3.5 Oglala to Loneman Pedestrian Trail and SuAnne Big Crow Trail from SuAnne Center to
Install Lighting for Safety $8,500
Project closeout.Comments:SuAnne Big Crow & Oglala-Loneman Trail Lighting
TTP 122, 132, 6210613101 Shannon 4.7 BIA Rt. 122, 132, and 62 near Wakpamni Housing.
Gravel preparation and double layer chip seal.
$777,508
Comments:Wakpamni Housing Chip Seal
TTP 2510612109 Shannon 6.7 BIA 25 from BIA 2 west of Kyle north
Reconstruct and Gravel Surfacing
$6,047,000
Comments:BIA 25 - Kyle North
TTP N/A10612107 Shannon N/A OST Transportation Department Building in Pine
Ridge
Construction of a pre-engineered metal office building
$1,282,230
Comments:OSTDOT Office Building
Page 1 of 5
213
TTP & Safety Grant Funds
2710613116 Shannon 1.57 BIA 27 from Wounded Knee to Porcupine Butte
Safety Upgrades $94,500
Safety work at the Wounded Knee parking area.Comments:BIA Rt. 27 - Safety Upgrades
TTP and TIGER V Grant
BIA 210613117 Shannon 17.6 Pine Ridge Indian Reservation Reconstruction and Surfacing $8,621,825
Project will be constructed with TIGER V Funds and designed with TTP Funds ($187,200 TTP Funds and $8,777,960 TIGER V Funds).
Comments:BIA 2 - Gateway to the Badlands
Total Amount for Construction Year $17,831,5632014
Construction Year 2014, 2016, 2018Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP Multiple10613122 Shannon, Jackson and Bennett
230 Paved IRR Roads throughout the Pine Ridge Indian
Reservation
Complete striping of the paved roads
$975,000
Complete the centerline and edge striping on all the paved roads for safety.Comments:Multi-Route Pavement Striping
Total Amount for Construction Year $975,0002014, 2016, 2018
Construction Year 2015Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP 2510614101 Shannon 5.7 BIA 25 from BIA 2 west of Kyle north
Asphalt Surfacing $3,100,000
Comments:BIA 25 - Kyle North (Hot Plant Mix Surfacing)
TTP and PLH-D 410612113 Bennett 3 The north end of Allen Road from BIA 22 to BIA 4
Reconstruction and hot asphalt surfacing plus adjacent trail
work
$4,050,000
Includes $2,000,000 PLH-D FundsComments:Allen Road - BIA 4 Extension
Total Amount for Construction Year $7,150,0002015
Page 2 of 5
214
Construction Year 2016Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP 2TBD Shannon 4 From Sharps Corner Junction with BIA Rt. 27 to Kyle
Asphalt Repairs and Leveling $1,000,000
Complete repairs and leveling to maintain safe driving conditionsComments:BIA Rt. 2 - Sharps Corner to Kyle Spot Leveling
TTP 3210612122 Shannon 13 Between Pine Ridge and BIA Route 41
Asphalt leveling and pipe repairs
$1,000,000
Repair settled areas to improve safety.Comments:BIA Rt. 32 - Spot Fill, Leveling & Pipe Repairs
TTP 41TBD Shannon 10 BIA 41 - US HWY 18 North - Various Locations
Asphalt leveling $698,904
Comments:BIA 41 Spot Leveling
TTP - Bridge 4910612125 Shannon 0.1 Structure Number A133 on BIA 49 0.1 mile south of BIA 27
near Wounded Knee
Replace Functionally Obsolete bridge with a box culvert
$720,000
The bridge is rated as functionally obsolete and needs replacement.Comments:BIA Rt. 49 -Struct. #A133 - Wounded Knee Bridge
TTP and Housing
5010612110 Shannon 0.75 BIA 50 from Junction with BIA Route 115 through the
Housing Development and
Reconstruction and paving of the streets
$890,000
$300,000 funding from Housing for curb and gutter.Comments:BIA Rt. 50 - Oglala Housing Streets
Total Amount for Construction Year $4,308,9042016
Construction Year 2017Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
Page 3 of 5
215
TTP 48TBD Shannon 1.3 Housing streets in Manderson Reconstruction of failing streets with PCC pavement on steep
hills
$1,000,000
Portions of the streets are on steep grades and the existing asphalt has crept and slid downhill.
Comments:Manderson Housing Streets
TTP Multiple *TBD Shannon and Jackson
TBD Roads in various locations * Chip sealing $914,137
Comments:Multi-Route Chip Seal
TTP - Bridge 610612126 Jackson 0.1 Structure Number A122 over Corn Creek on BIA 6, 13 miles
northeast of Allen
Replace Structurally Deficient bridge with a box culvert
$600,000
It has not been determined whether this is a BIA Road or a Jackson Co. Road. Will only be done if a Project Agreement can be reached between the Oglala Sioux Tribe and County if
Comments:BIA Rt. 6 - Struct. #A122 - Wooden Bridge
TTP - Bridge 88TBD Shannon 0.2 White River bridge on Tribal Route 88, 7.9 miles northwest
of Oglala
Bridge Replacement $1,350,500
Existing bridge is deficient. Bridge funding will be requestedComments:BIA Rt. 88 - Struct. #A154 - White River Bridge
TTP - Bridge 90TBD Shannon 0.1 Bridge over White Clay Creek on Route 90, Moccasin Park
Lane, 0.5 mi. W. of US 18
Replace bridge with box culvert $700,000
Replace single lane bridge on Tribal Road 90.Comments:BIA Rt. 90 - Struct. #A155 - Moccasin Park Bridge
Total Amount for Construction Year $4,564,6372017
Construction Year 2018Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP 244TBD Jackson 1.91 From Wanblee School along BIA 2 to the Housing areas
Construct and surface new trail $750,000
The trail is needed for safety of students and others moving from the housing areas to the village
Comments:Wanblee Trail
Page 4 of 5
216
TTP 245TBD Shannon .1 From Manderson Housing to the Wounded Knee School
Construct a hiking trail for students to get to school
$100,000
Trail will be for safe access to school and for crossing BIA Rt. 33Comments:Manderson Trail
TTP 246TBD Shannon 0.53 From the theatre center and housing to the school in Kyle
Construction of a hiking and bike trail with hot asphalt
concrete pavement
$375,000
The trail is needed for safety of the students and othersComments:Kyle Trail
TTP 33TBD Shannon 13.5 BIA 33 from BIA 27 at Rockyford to BIA 14
Gooseneck Road
Spot asphalt leveling $500,000
Comments:BIA Rt. 33 - Rockyford to Gooseneck
TTP 41TBD Shannon 7 From BIA 32 to US Hwy 18 1.5" Overlay $1,000,000
Comments:BIA 41 Overlay
TTP 49TBD Shannon 1.1 Wounded Knee Housing along BIA Route 28
Reconstruct Streets including drainage, curb and gutter plus
Asphalt Surfacing
$1,550,000
Existing streets are deteriorating.Comments:Wounded Knee Housing Streets
Total Amount for Construction Year $4,275,0002018
Page 5 of 5
217
218
219
220
Transportation Improvement ProgramA07345 - Rosebud Sioux Tribe
Construction Year 2015Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP BIA Rt 1, Section 20
RST-2015-RT1&PWY
Todd 1.73 Rosebud, SD Grading, surfacing, widening of & adding lanes with pathways
and miscellaneous items
$8,220,090
Length of road work is 1.73; length of pathway is 1.73 miles. Carry over funding from prior projects of $5,974,000.00 and current funding of $1,526,000.00. Fy2016 funding $90,000.00.
Comments:BIA Rt #1 with Pathways Rosebud Creek to HeadStart Center &
TTP/County/State
Hwy 63RST2015-HWY63CS
Mellette 6.2 in Mellette County from Norris, SD to US Hwy 44 Jct
Chip/Seal existing aphalt road way
$80,500
Patnership with Mellette County. Tribe will match 50% or $80,500.00 Mellette County will match 50% or &80,500.00 with SDDOT Chip Seal project funding. SDDOT will asssume the
Comments:SD Hwy 63 Chip Seal
Total Amount for Construction Year $8,300,5902015
Construction Year 2015-2016Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP Tribal Route 0045
RST2015-JDCE
Todd . 3 Ring Thunder Community; Ring Thunder, SD
Reconstruct existing entry into the facility
$95,000
Mill existing asphalt, adding to gravel base to getting up to spec. and asphalt re-surfacing. The PS&E and the Construction Engineering costs are not included in the Construction cost.
Comments:Juvenile Detention Center Entry
Total Amount for Construction Year $95,0002015-2016
Construction Year 2015-2019Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
Page 1 of 5
221
TTP BIA Rt. 0010, Section 90;
RST2016-SGUAR
Todd 1.5 South Antelope Community, Mission, SD
Rehab & Gravel and existing asphalt and re-surfacing the
access road.
$240,000
milling of existing asphalt, get gravel base up to specs on the existing gravel surfaces leading into and connecting concrete road and parking lot with asphalt resurfacing, placing drainage
Comments:SGU/Commodity Access Road
TTP See comment
Todd, Mellete, Tripp, Gregory,
24.9 Rosebud Indian Reservation Chip seal completed road projects to protect and them the
life of the surface.
$626,000
BIA Rt 1, Section 10, L=7.1 miles; BIA Rt #501, Section 10, L=1.9 miles; BIA RT 30, Section 10, L=7.1 miles; BIA Rt#9, Section 10,20 L= 5.8 miles; BIA Rt # 4, Section 10,20, L=2.4 miles;
Comments:Chip Seal
Total Amount for Construction Year $866,0002015-2019
Construction Year 2016Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP US83 (SDDOT Rt
RST2016-Hwy83CTL
Todd 12.2 12 mi South of Mission to Nebraska stateline
Shoulder widening and turning lanes
$200,000
Partnering with SDDOT to add turning lanes at the Sicangu Village & Estates and the Casino entry with the shoulder widening project. Fy2016. The Tribe will pay for the turning lanes to
Comments:US Hwy 83/CasinoTurning Lanes
TTP, State SD HWY 83RST-2013-SVP
Todd 1.0 Mission, SD and along SD HWY 83 between the Rosebud
Casino and housing area.
New pathway construction with lighting
$514,321
SD DOT project, state will reimburse less tribe portion. Tribe share $102,065.00. SDDOT share $408,256.00.
Comments:Sicangu Village Pathway
Total Amount for Construction Year $714,3212016
Construction Year 2016-2017Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP BIA Rt 903 Section 10
RST-2015-HARE
Todd .06 BIA 903 within Rosebud, SD. Rehab nad resurface the exisiting access entry to hospital
$575,000
Mill existing aphalt and re-surface existing access entry to hospital, bring the drainage, and base course up to specs. The Engineers at IHS are designing the access/entry road to the
Comments:Hospital Access Road Entry
Page 2 of 5
222
TTP-Bridge BIA Rt. 5: Section 60
RST-2016-TSBRA033
Todd m31. 10 mi.NE. of Spring Crk School over Little White River
Replacement of the entire bridge
$1,300,000
TTP Bridge Program funding PSE-$75,000.00; Construction-$1,300,000.00 TTP Bridge funding obtained for PSE. Have applied for CMS and Construction from Bridge Program.
Comments:Two Strike Bridge - A033
Total Amount for Construction Year $1,875,0002016-2017
Construction Year 2016-2021Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP/TIGER VII/County
BIA 7, Section 10-
RST-2016-SMC
Todd 16.1 Rosebud SD and East along BIA Rt 7 to US83
PS&E, full reconstruct, drainage, grade, and pave, etc.
$22,000,000
Will be financially partnering with Todd County Commissioners to extend from the 6 mile corner to US83 South from Mission, SD to design a safer roadway for all public and
Comments:Six Mile Corner
Total Amount for Construction Year $22,000,0002016-2021
Construction Year 2017Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP Bridge BIA Rt.5; Section 40
RST-2017-HHBB-A039
Todd 31km Rosebud Agency; S. Spotted Tail Lane; crosses over
Rosebud Creek
Replacement of entire structure of the bridge
$1,300,000
TTP Bridge funding obtained for PSE. Have applied for CMS and Construction from Bridge Program.
Comments:Hollow Horn Bear Bridge-A035
Total Amount for Construction Year $1,300,0002017
Construction Year 2018Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP BIA Rt.1 Section 10
RST-2018-KR
Todd 10.1 South of St. Francis, SD along BIA Rt 1 to Nebraska state line.
Reconstruct existing highway $8,812,275
This project will be a Multi Year Construction Project, Fy2018, Fy2019, Fy2020-C-$2,000,000.00 -CE $150,000.00, Fy2021-C- $2,000,000.00 - CE $150,000.00, Fy2022-C-
Comments:Kilgore Road
Page 3 of 5
223
TTP Bridge BIA Rt. 5; Section 20
RST-2018-VB-A036
Todd 27km 5.1 km N. of Spring Creek School; crossing over Little
White River
Replacement of the entire structure of the bridge
$1,300,000
TTP Bridge funding obtained for PSE. Have applied for CMS and Construction from Bridge Program.
Comments:Valandra Bridge-A036
Total Amount for Construction Year $10,112,2752018
Construction Year 2019Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP BIA Rt.1;Section
RST-2015-TSP
Todd .5 Two Strike Community connecting different housing
with safe pedestrian and
build a pedestrian/bikepath with base, asphalt pathway with
lighting
$75,000
Comments:Two Strike Pathway
TTP Rt 501, Section 10
RST-2019-SFLW
Todd 6.8 West of St. Francis, SD and North toward BIA Rt 5 until
meeting River Road.
Preparation of PSE for recycle and overlay.
$6,805,868
Mill the existing, add gravel to the existing base coverage and re-surface with asphalt, multi yearconstruction project. Fy2019 C-$2,500,000.00- CE-$175,000.00, Fy2020 -C-
Comments:BIA #501 St. Francis to Little White
TTP Bridge BIA 5; Section 80
RST-2018- CDB-A032
Todd 35km 17.6 km.NE of Spring Creek, crossing over the Little White
River
Replacement of the entire structure of the Bridge
$1,300,000
TTP Bridge funding obtained for PSE. Have applied for CMS and Construction from Bridge Program.
Comments:Crow Dog Bridge-A032
Total Amount for Construction Year $8,180,8682019
Construction Year 2020Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP Bridge BIA Rt 11; Section 20
RST2015-OHWB-
Todd km3 Rosebud Street-cross over Rosebud Creek
Replacement of existing bridge $1,300,000
TTP Bridge funds will be used to replace the existing bridgeSufficiency Rating = 47.7. the Construction Engineering of $45,000.00 is not included in the
Comments:Old Hollow Wood Bridge-A039
Total Amount for Construction Year $1,300,0002020
Page 4 of 5
224
Construction Year 2021Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP South USHwy 18
2021-HCP Mellette 2 White River South 2 miles Construction pathway with lighting from WhiteRiver City to
Horse Creek Community.
$75,000
Partner with Mellette County Commissioners and SDDOT to put a pedestrain pathway South of White River, SD, through a Enhancement Grant offered from SDDOT. The tribe will use
Comments:Horse Creek Pathway
TTP/Bridge BIA Rt. 7; Section 30
RST2021-LB-A031
Todd 40km At Ghost Hawk Park- Over the Little White River
Replacement of Bridge $1,300,000
TTP Funding for PSE,CMS,ConstructionSufficiency Rating= 67.0
Comments:Lambert Bridge-A031
TTPState Enhancement
East US Hwy18 from
2021-WHP Todd 2 Antelope Community construct a pedestrain pathway between Antelope community
and White Horse housing
$285,000
The tribe will apply for Enhancement Grant through the State of South Dakota with a tribal match from TTP funding. Construction will done in Fy2021 with an estimated cost of
Comments:White Horse Pathway
Total Amount for Construction Year $1,660,0002021
Page 5 of 5
225
226
227
228
INDIAN ROADS RESERVATION PROGRAMCSTIPS Module of ITIMS
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate
The CSTIP report shows the full contents of one or more CSTIPS.For example, if the report is requested for a particular reservation with a managing entity that also manages two other reservations, then projects for all threereservations are reported. This means that subtotal amounts are always correct, no matter what the filter might be. However, see the next remark on how toread subtotals.
The CSTIP Subtotal is the full total for values on the CSTIP.The state subtotal is the sum of the values in the state and on the current CSTIP. This report does not show overall state totals.The location subtotal is the sum of values for projects on a particular reservation and in a particular state. When a reservation lies in two states, project datafor each part including the subtotal is presented in separate places.
Any type of CSTIP may be the subject of the report.
229
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:57 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 2 of 4
A0900200
A0901500
A0924700
A0942900
A0946600
A0965200
75,600
0
0
0
0
0
1,477,500
16,000
26,000
0
0
11,000
0
2,450,000
0
25,000
0
400,000
0
0
272,700
0
1,510,000
0
1,553,100
2,466,000
298,700
25,000
1,510,000
411,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
0 26,000 49,600
0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
65,500 1,337,000
0 75,000
0 0
16,000 0
0 0
26,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
11,000 0
0 0 0 0
50,000 2,300,000
0 100,000
0 0 0 0
0 25,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
25,000 325,000
0 50,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
15,000 250,500
0 7,200
0 0 0 0
65,000 1,315,000
0 130,000
0 0 0 0
65,500 1,363,000
49,600 75,000
50,000 2,300,000
16,000 100,000
15,000 250,500 26,000 7,200
0 25,000
0 0
65,000 1,315,000
0 130,000
25,000 325,000 11,000 50,000
Big Coulee Road
Veblen South
Barse Trail
Multi Route Safety Striping
Barker Hill Housing Phase II
Long Hollow South
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
RECONS
REHAB
REHAB
SAFETY
NEWCON
REHAB
R
R
R
O
R
R
7
7
3
P2
7
7
46 - South DakotaState A09347 - Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate
109 - Roberts
091 - Marshall
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
651Program Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2013
Funding Amount 3,123,749
FIRST PAGE FOR CSTIPA09347 - SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATEEntity Name
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
03-SEP-13
230
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:57 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 3 of 4
A0965300
A0969100
A0970200
A0971100
A0975500
A0977000
250,000
0
0
49,900
1,627,249
260,000
0
13,000
275,000
965,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
201,000
0
0
0
0
250,000
214,000
288,500
1,014,900
4,982,249
260,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
1,000 248,000
0 1,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 26,000 23,900
0
75,000 1,458,749
18,500 75,000
1,000 248,000 10,000 1,000
0 0 0 0
0 0
13,000 0
25,000 225,000
0 25,000
50,000 835,000
5,000 75,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
20,000 165,000
0 16,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1,000 248,000
0 1,000
20,000 165,000 13,000 16,000
25,000 225,000 13,500 25,000
50,000 861,000 28,900 75,000
150,000 4,588,749
18,500 225,000
1,000 248,000 10,000 1,000
Long Hollow Housing
Lake Traverse District Center Access
Pow Wow Road
Old Tiospa Zina Road
BIA 7 Barker Hill to SD 10
Enemy Swim Housing
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
NEWCON
NEWCON
REHAB
RECONS
RECONS
NEWCON
R
R
R
R
R
R
7
7
7
7
7
7
46 - South DakotaState A09347 - Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
037 - Day
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
651Program Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2013
Funding Amount 3,123,749
A09347 - SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATEEntity Name
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
13,500 0
0 0 0 0
75,000 3,130,000
0 150,000
0 0 0 0
0
0
13,500
0
3,355,000
0
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
03-SEP-13
231
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:57 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 4 of 4
3,123,749 3,418,500 2,833,500 2,925,000 2,033,700 14,334,449
3,123,749 3,418,500 2,833,500 2,925,000 2,033,700 14,334,449
14,334,449
3,123,749 3,418,500 2,833,500 2,925,000 2,033,700 14,334,449
A0979000
A0983101
A0983102
A0989900
A09RM550
86,000
5,000
50,000
670,000
50,000
0
0
0
0
50,000
0
0
0
0
50,000
0
0
0
0
50,000
86,000
5,000
50,000
670,000
250,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
5,000 80,000 1,000
0
0 0
4,500 500
0 0
45,000 5,000
30,000 640,000
0 0
0 0
50,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
50,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
50,000 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
50,000 0
5,000 80,000 1,000
0
0 0
4,500 500
0 0
45,000 5,000
30,000 640,000
0 0
0 0
250,000 0
Big Coulee Culvert Repair
SWO Long Range Transportation Plann
SWO Road Inventory Update
Multi Route Gravel Surfacing
SWO Road Maintenance 23 USC 204 (c
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
3,123,749 3,418,500 2,833,500 2,925,000
REHAB
PLANING
PLANING
REHAB
PLANING
R
O
O
R
O
C3
P9
P8
3
T1
46 - South DakotaState A09347 - Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
109 - Roberts
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
Location Subtotal
State Subtotal
CSTIP Subtotal
Report Total
651Program Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2013
Funding Amount 3,123,749
A09347 - SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATEEntity Name
2,033,700
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
50,000 0
0
0
0
0
50,000
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
03-SEP-13
232
233
234
Transportation Improvement ProgramStanding Rock Sioux Tribe
Construction Year 2014Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP 3; Sec 40 Sioux N/A Under Kenel Road appr. 1.3 miles north of South Dakota
state line.
Removal of existing culvert and replace it with a precast
concrete box culvert
$1,170,000
Existing corrugated steel pipe culvert has a low rating, major rusting problems, severe upstream end erosion problems and replace it with a precast concrete box culvert and
Comments:Kenel Road Box Culvert Project
TTP 30; Sec 20 Corson N/A Along bike trail from Bear Solider, SD to McLaughlin, SD
Installing lighting along the existing bike trail.
$298,482
Completing plans and contract documents and constructing lighting along the existing bike trail for safety concerns. The SD Transportation Commission recommeded this roject for the
Comments:Bear Solider South Project - Lighting
Total Amount for Construction Year $1,468,4822014
Construction Year 2015Funds RouteProject No. County Length Location Type of Work Amount
TTP 3; Sec 40 & 50
A10-3-2010(01)
Sioux 8.3 From SD State line north 4.3 miles
REHAB; Patching $2,220,000
IRR funds to start PE activities; Then other funding may be used for construction, and is pending arrangement of funds / Tiger Grant(s).
Comments:Kenel Road Reconstruction - ND Portion
Total Amount for Construction Year $2,220,0002015
Page 1 of 1
235
236
237
238
INDIAN ROADS RESERVATION PROGRAMCSTIPS Module of ITIMS
Yankton Sioux Tribe
The CSTIP report shows the full contents of one or more CSTIPS.For example, if the report is requested for a particular reservation with a managing entity that also manages two other reservations, then projects for all threereservations are reported. This means that subtotal amounts are always correct, no matter what the filter might be. However, see the next remark on how toread subtotals.
The CSTIP Subtotal is the full total for values on the CSTIP.The state subtotal is the sum of the values in the state and on the current CSTIP. This report does not show overall state totals.The location subtotal is the sum of values for projects on a particular reservation and in a particular state. When a reservation lies in two states, project datafor each part including the subtotal is presented in separate places.
Any type of CSTIP may be the subject of the report.
239
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:55 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 2 of 4
A0814100
A0832100
A0833400
A0833500
A0840000
A0840100
0
78,600
0
14,000
245,500
0
400,000
1,000
348,000
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
20,000
0
0
400,000
80,600
853,000
94,000
245,500
350,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
0 0 0 0
78,600 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 14,000
0 0
15,000 185,000 35,500 10,000
0 0 0 0
25,000 350,000 10,000 15,000
1,000 0 0 0
10,000 325,000
3,000 10,000
0 20,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 20,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 20,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
25,000 350,000 10,000 15,000
80,600 0 0 0
37,000 775,000
6,000 35,000
0 94,000
0 0
15,000 185,000 35,500 10,000
15,000 320,000
5,000 10,000
TOWNSHIP MULT-ROUTE GRAVELING
YANKTON TRANSIT PROJECT
WAGNER SOUTH HOUSING STREETS
MULTI-ROUTE STRIPING
SD HWY 46 TURN LANE
MARTY MAIN STREET
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
REHAB
TRANSIT
REHAB
SAFETY
RECONS
REHAB
R
R
R
O
R
R
3
T2
7
P2
7
6
46 - South DakotaState A08346 - Yankton Sioux Tribe
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
651Program Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2013
Funding Amount 1,115,484
FIRST PAGE FOR CSTIPA08346 - Yankton Sioux TribeEntity Name
0 0 0 0
1,000 0 0 0
27,000 450,000
3,000 25,000
0 20,000
0 0
0 0 0 0
15,000 320,000
5,000 10,000
0
1,000
505,000
20,000
0
350,000
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
26-MAR-13
240
Indian Reservation Roads ProgramsFederal Lands Highway
25-AUG-2014 02:55 PM
REPORT FILTER: Reporting one CSTIP.
CSTIP Report
Page 3 of 4
1,115,484 1,166,000 1,084,000 1,041,500 880,000 5,286,984
5,286,984
1,115,484 1,166,000 1,084,000 1,041,500 880,000 5,286,984
A0843500
A0843600
A0883101
A0883102
A0883103
A08RM550
487,384
0
15,000
5,000
65,000
205,000
0
0
0
0
65,000
250,000
0
686,500
0
0
85,000
250,000
0
525,000
0
0
85,000
250,000
487,384
1,211,500
15,000
5,000
365,000
1,180,000
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
CECONS
PEZ
20,000 447,384
0 20,000
0 0 0 0
0 0
13,500 1,500
0 0
4,500 500
0 0
65,000 0
0 0 0
205,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
65,000 0
0 0 0
250,000
0 0 0 0
60,000 500,000 81,500 45,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
85,000 0
0 0 0
250,000
0 0 0 0
60,000 400,000
0 65,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
85,000 0
0 0 0
250,000
20,000 447,384
0 20,000
120,000 900,000 81,500
110,000
0 0
13,500 1,500
0 0
4,500 500
0 0
365,000 0
0 0 0
1,180,000
MARTY NORTH ACCESS RD
FIFTH STREET EXTENSION
Yankton Sioux Inventory Update
Yankton Sioux Long Range Transportatio
YANKTON SIOUX TRANSPORTATION
ROAD MAINTENANCE 23 USC 204 (C)
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
1,115,484 1,166,000 1,084,000 1,041,500
NEWCON
NEWCON
PLANING
PLANING
PLANING
PLANING
R
R
O
O
O
O
7
7
P8
P9
P9
T1
46 - South DakotaState A08346 - Yankton Sioux Tribe
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
023 - Charles Mix
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
County
County
County
County
County
County
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Project Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
Work Type
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
PCAS
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Class
Location Covers that part of the reservation within the current state.Projects on the CSTIP withn this state are listed and subtotaled in this section
Location Subtotal
State Subtotal
CSTIP Subtotal
651Program Class CodeCSTIP Type Fiscal YearTIP 2013
Funding Amount 1,115,484
A08346 - Yankton Sioux TribeEntity Name
880,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
65,000 0
0 0 0
225,000
0
0
0
0
65,000
225,000
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2013 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2014 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2015 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2016 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
FY 2017 ($)
26-MAR-13
241
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
242
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 243
Railroads
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 244
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 245
RAILROADS Rail Planning The SDDOT has established a transportation planning process that includes specific planning considerations as identified in Figure 2 & Figure 3 in the Introduction to this document. These considerations,
including rail alternative analysis, ensure equity among the modes for comprehensive decision-making.
Background & Organization Formal rail planning in the Department was born as a result of major abandonment and embargo activities of the 1970s and 1980s. These activities resulted in the loss of rail service on over 50% of the once total 4,420 miles in the state. The State, in cooperation with private railroads, was successful in restoring service on over 900 previously abandoned rail line miles in the state. There are currently 1,902 operating rail miles in the state. During this rail crisis, the State developed a rail planning process that analyzed each rail line in the state and identified the essential lines that were vital to the State's economy. Some of these troubled rail lines were purchased by other railroads and service restored. The remaining essential lines for which a private solution could not be found were purchased by the State. Purchased lines, were generally divided into the two categories of the Essential Core System and Local Option Lines. The State Core System was comprised of 373.6 miles of track and served as a vital link between South Dakota’s principal grain production area and markets in the Pacific Northwest, Minneapolis, Duluth and the Gulf of Mexico. This system was operated by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad under agreement with the State. Local Option lines were identified as feeder lines to other rail systems. The State purchased these lines with the understanding that
future operations must be the responsibility of local units of government. Each of these rail lines was deemed important to the communities they served and the purchase provided the opportunity for continued rail service. Local Option Lines are currently classified as 399 miles being leased and 126.9 miles not currently leased. In 1980, the State Legislature turned railroad oversight activities over to the Department of Transportation. These activities are currently mainly under the direction of the Division of Finance & Management, Local Transportation Programs. The state’s role is to manage the state owned rail property, work towards enhancing rail safety, statewide rail planning and administering federal pass through funds. The governing bodies for railroad issues are the South Dakota Railroad Board and the South Dakota Railroad Authority. The Railroad Board shall approve of matters of operation, management, finance, marketing and development of rail services over all properties and facilities acquired, leased or controlled by the State. The Railroad Authority has the power to acquire property and to construct, maintain and equip railroad facilities as the Legislature declares to be in the public interest for railroad purposes.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 246
The Core System was sold to BNSF Railway in November 2005 for $42.5 million. The sale conditions provide access to other Class 1
carriers for shippers located on local option lines.
Rail Carriers & Operations Eleven railroad companies provide freight service in South Dakota. These companies and miles operated in South Dakota are as follows:
• Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad ……………………………… 890 miles • Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern Railroad ……………………………… 586 miles • Dakota Southern Railway .………………………………………… 190 miles • D & I Railroad ……………………………………………………… 83 miles • Dakota, Missouri Valley & Western ………………………………… 76 miles • Sisseton – Milbank Railroad ………………………………………… 37 miles • Sunflower Railroad ………………………………………………… 28 miles • Ellis & Eastern Railroad …………………………………………….. 14 miles • CP Rail (Soo Line) …….…………………………………………….. 6 miles
Total 1,910 miles Railroad Projects There are currently no dedicated funding sources for rail line rehabilitation in the State of South Dakota. Therefore, the cost to rehabilitate rail lines must be supported by the operating railroad. The state does administer a trust fund that makes loans to elevators for the purpose of track expansions to improve their loading operations. These loans need Railroad Board approval. There are also dedicated funds available for safety improvements at public railroad grade crossings. These projects are identified in the Railroad Crossing Improvement Projects funding category section of this report. South Dakota received a $16 million dollar TIGER II grant late in 2010 to replace the existing 65lb rail with 115 lb. or heavier from Mitchell to Chamberlain. Total project costs exceed $28 million with the difference being made up with private, local and state sources. The project has spawned the development of a new elevator
on the line in the Kimball area. South Dakota received a $12.68 million dollar TIGER 2014 grant to reconstruct the MRC Railroad from Chamberlain to Presho. The project includes replacing the existing 65, 75 and 85 lb. rail with 132 and 136 lb. rail, repairing bridges and repairing culverts. Total project costs exceed $36.4 million with the difference being made up with private, local and state sources. The project has spawned the development of a new elevator in Kennebec. Thirty miles of 77, 80 and 85 lb. rail is being replaced on the Aberdeen to Geneseo Jct line in Brown and Marshall Counties. This $11.1 million dollar project will also include the construction of a wye near Britton, South Dakota. State funding totals $5.85 million with the balance being provided by the operator of the line.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 247
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 248
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 249
Airports
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 250
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 251
AERONAUTICS The South Dakota Department of Transportation, Division of Finance & Management, Office of Air, Rail & Transit, is responsible for assisting the cities that desire an airport project utilizing State or Federal funding. A short, intermediate and long range airport development plan was developed as part of the South Dakota State Aviation System Plan (SASP) and was completed in June of 2011. Before any project becomes a reality, it must have approval from the local airport sponsor, the Federal Aviation Administration and the South Dakota Aeronautics Commission. Funding for Federal Airport Development projects is authorized in the “HR 658 – FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012”. The funding program under this reauthorization was for (4) years, FY2011 - FY2014. A portion of this Act, called the Airport Improvement Program (AIP), provides 90% Federal aid for eligible project development at 57 of the 70 approved public use airports in South Dakota. The 57 airports are listed on the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) which is a prerequisite for being eligible for Federal aid. Air Carrier Airports that enplane a minimum of 10,000 passengers receive a yearly allocation of Federal Funds with a guaranteed minimum amount of $1,000,000 if national authorization funding is $3.2 billion dollars. AIP grants awarded nationally have been as
follows: FY2011, $3.5 Billion; FY2012, $3.3 Billion; FY2013, $2.9 Billion; FY2014, $3.2 Billion. Four South Dakota airports were eligible for these entitlement funds in FY2014. Rapid City received $734,000; Sioux Falls received $2,732,635; Pierre, $919,000; and Aberdeen, $1,626,000. Aberdeen, Pierre, Rapid City and Sioux Falls are anticipated to receive similar entitlement funds in FY2015. General Aviation and non-primary Commercial Service Airport projects are also funded under the AIP for 90% of the eligible projects costs. (28) Airports in this category received $5.2 Million of entitlement funding in FY2014. In FY2014, South Dakota was allocated $2.7 Million of AIP apportionment based on the number of NPIAS airports in the state. Apportionment may be used at the state’s discretion in addition to an airport’s entitlement funds. Including all funding categories, airport improvements in FY2014 totaled $22 Million. Some General Aviation airport projects are funded on a state/local basis for projects such as minor grading, re-sealing runways and the installation of runway lighting systems, beacons, etc.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 252
Federal funds are derived from aviation-user charges which support the Airport and Airway Trust Fund. These user charges are as follows: Domestic Air Passenger Tickets 10% Air Freight Waybills 6.25% International Passenger Departure $6 per passenger Non-Airline Aviation Gasoline (AVGAS) 15 cents per gallon Other Non-Airline Aviation Fuel (JETFUEL) 17.5 cents per gallon State funds for Airport Development are derived from a State tax on AVGAS and JETFUEL. There is 6 cents per gallon tax on AVGAS and 4 cents per gallon tax on JETFUEL. These funds are retained in an Aviation Trust Fund and utilized for airport improvements within South Dakota.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 253
Summary
Commercial Service 6 Large General Aviation 6 Medium General Aviation 17 Small General Aviation 26 Basic Service 15 Total 70
Airport Classifications
Commercial Service Large General Aviation Medium General Aviation Small General Aviation Basic Service Aberdeen Brookings Belle Fourche Buffalo Arlington
Huron Madison Britton Bison Bowdle Pierre Mitchell Chamberlain Canton Clear Lake
Rapid City Spearfish Custer County Clark Corsica Sioux Falls Tea Gettysburg DeSmet Custer State Park Watertown Yankton Gregory Eagle Butte Herreid
Hot Springs Edgemont Howard Lemmon Eureka Isabel Milbank Faith Kadoka Miller Faulkton Kimball Mobridge Flandreau Lake Andes Philip Highmore Lake Preston Redfield Hoven Presho Sturgis Martin Timber Lake Vermillion McLaughlin White River Wagner Murdo Winner Onida Parkston Pine Ridge Platte Rosebud Sisseton Springfield Wall Webster Wessington Springs
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 254
Commercial Service: These airports support some level of scheduled commercial airline service in addition to a full range of general aviation aircraft. This includes both domestic and international destinations. Airports in this category typically have a minimum runway length of 6,500 feet, with precision approaches, weather reporting equipment, major repair service, and Jet A/100 LL fuel available 24 hours. They typically have an Airport Reference Code (ARC) of C-II or greater. Large General Aviation: These airports support all general aviation aircraft and accommodate corporate aviation activity, including business jets, helicopters, and other general aviation activity. These airports’ primary users are business related and service a large geographic region or they experience high levels of general aviation activity. Airports in this category typically have a minimum runway length of 5,000 feet, with non-precision approaches, weather reporting equipment, minor repair service, and JetA/100LL fuel available. These will typically have an ARC of C-I. Medium General Aviation: These airports support most twin and single engine aircraft and may accommodate occasional business jets. These airports support a regional transportation need. Airports in this category typically have a runway length of at least 4,200 feet, with non-precision or GPS approaches, weather reporting equipment, on-call repair service, 100LL fuel available, and an ARC of B-II. Small General Aviation: These airports support primarily single-engine, general aviation aircraft, but are capable of accommodating smaller twin-engine general aviation aircraft. These airports support local air transportation needs and special use aviation activities. Airports in this category typically have a minimum runway length of 3,000 feet, with visual approaches, and an ARC of B-I. Basic General Aviation: These airports support primarily single-engine, general aviation aircraft, special use aviation activities, and access to remote areas or provide emergency service access. Airports in this category are generally not included in the NPIAS, have visual approaches, have an ARC of A-I and may have turf runways.
Airport Classification Descriptions
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 255
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 256
This page left intentionally blank
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 257
Public Transportation
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 258
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 259
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION GENERAL The South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) acts as a facilitator of public transportation services. SDDOT does not directly provide the services, but contracts for services within South Dakota. The SDDOT disseminates information on US Department of Transportation programs and provides technical services to applicants in preparing funding proposals. Local governments and nonprofit entities are responsible for the development and operation of local transportation systems. Private enterprises are encouraged to participate to the maximum feasible extent in providing public transportation. Eligible subgrantees may contract for services from, or lease vehicles to, private operators. Beginning with MAP-21 (effective 10/1/12), states will receive apportionments from 4 programs. These include: Section 5305, Section 5310, Section 5311 and Section 5339.
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION SECTION 5305 PROGRAM (Metropolitan & Statewide And Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning) Provides funding and procedural requirements for transportation planning in metropolitan areas and states. Planning programs are jointly administered by FTA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), which provides additional funding. Section 5305 provides 80% federal share with a required 20% non-federal match. SECTION 5310 PROGRAM (Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities) Authorizes capital grants to private nonprofit organizations and governmental authorities when no non-profit organizations are available to provide services to elderly and/or persons with disabilities. FTA provides 80% of all eligible costs for equipment, with 20% match coming from sources other than federal funds. Requires inclusion of project within a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Contact the SDDOT Office of Air, Rail and Transit to receive a detailed listing of providers that have received 5310 funds
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 260
SECTION 5311 PROGRAM (Rural Transit Formula Grant) Authorizes capital, administrative and operating assistance grants to State agencies, local governments, Indian tribes, and non-profit organizations providing public transportation services. All said projects must benefit residents in non-urbanized areas of South Dakota. Section 5311 provides 82.82% of the costs for administrative expenses, and 51.76% of the net operating deficit. SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM MAP-21 eliminated Section 5316 Program. Funding combined with Section 5311. SECTION 5339 PROGRAM (Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grant) Authorizes capital grants to public and specialized transportation providers. Section 5339 provides 80% of all eligible costs for equipment, with 20% match coming from sources other than federal funds. Contact the SDDOT Office of Air, Rail and Transit to receive a detailed listing of providers that have received 5339 funds. STATE MANAGEMENT PLAN The transit office has a Section 5311 and 5310 State Management Plan (SMP). This is our office’s guiding documents and addresses how Transit will fund projects. The plan can be found on our website at http://www.sddot.com/transportation/transit/forms/Default.aspx in PDF format. For capital requests, an application is made available on the SDDOT website, emailed to 5311 sub recipients and past applicants, and it is also advertised typically in 2 newspapers in SD. Transit staff reviews applications and evaluate requests using a ranking system based on the criteria listed in both SMPs. Depending on availability of funding and the applicant; a capital request may be granted with Section 5339 or Section 5310 funds. The same process would be used to fund a capital request using Section 5339 funds although the office does not have a separate SMP for Section 5339 funds. Typically, grant capital requests are not funded with Section 5311 funds, although the process for funding capital requests is addressed in the Section 5311 SMP. For operating funding requests; sub recipients are made aware of the application availability by email. The selection criterion is also listed in the Section 5311 state management plan. With the passage of MAP21, and final Federal Transit Association Section 5339 guidance, a SMP will be required. The 5339 SMP will be sent to FTA for approval by November 15, 2015.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 261
South Dakota Program of Projects Office of Air, Rail and Transit
FY 2016-2019 SDDOT does anticipate that Congress will provide funding at the authorization levels contained in MAP-21.
5305 Planning 2016 2017 2018 2019 Metro Section 5305d $475,000 $500,000 $525,000 $550,000 Non-Metro Section 5305e $140,000 $165,000 $180,000 $205,000 5310 Program 2016 2017 2018 2019 Capital Equipment Rural $350,000 $350,000 $360,000 $360,000 Small Urban $400,000 $400,000 $420,000 $420,000 5311 Program 2016 2017 2018 2019 Estimated funding $6,300,000 $6,350,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 5339 Program 2016 2017 2018 2019 Rural $1,350,000 $1,400,000 $1,450,000 $1,500,000 Small Urban $ 440,000 $ 460,000 $ 480,000 $ 500,000
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 262
South Dakota Rural Public Transportation Providers (Section 5311 Sub recipients)
FY 2016-2019
Agencies to be Funded in 2016-2019
Aberdeen Ride Line (Aberdeen) Arrow Public Transit (Lemmon) Brandon City Transit (Brandon) Brookings Area Transit Authority (Brookings) Community Transit (Sisseton) Dell Rapids Transit (Dell Rapids) East Dakota Transit (Madison) Faulkton Community Transit (Faulkton) Inter-Lakes Community Action Program (Madison) RTAP Training Activities Groton Community Transit (Groton) Palace Transit (Mitchell) People’s Transit (Huron) River Cities Public Transportation (Pierre) Rosebud Sioux Tribe Transportation (Rosebud) ROCS Transit (Lake Andes) Sanborn County Public Transit (Woonsocket) Spink County Public Transit (Redfield) Siouxland Regional Transit (Union County) Standing Rock Transportation (S. Rock Reservation) Vermillion Public Transit (Vermillion) Watertown Area Transit (Watertown) West River Transit Authority (Spearfish) Yankton Area Transit Jefferson Lines (Intercity Bus Provider) City of Hartford SDDOT Administrative Costs DeSmet Transportation
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 263
MPO Transit Projects
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 264
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 265
2016- 2019 Rapid City MPO Public Transit Projects
Funding Category
County Location of Project Type of Improvement FTA Funds
State Funds
Local Funds
Total Costs
2016 FTA (Sec
5307) Pennington Rapid City Transit Operating and Capital
Assistance for Fixed Route and Dial-A-Ride service
$1,204820 $28,425 $802,757 $2,036,002
FTA (Sec 5310)
Pennington / Meade
Various agencies in the Rapid City Metropolitan Planning Area
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that provide services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$256,000 $0 $64,000 $320,000
FTA (Sec 5339)
Pennington Rapid City Metro Capital Assistance $133,460 $0 $33,365 $166,825
2017 FTA (Sec 5307)
Pennington Rapid City Transit Operating and Capital Assistance for Fixed Route and Dial-A-Ride service
$1,240,965 $28,425 $826,839 $2,096,229
FTA (Sec 5310)
Pennington / Meade
Various agencies in the Rapid City Metropolitan Planning Area
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that provide services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$128,000 $0 $32,000 $160,000
FTA (Sec 5339)
Pennington Rapid City Metro Capital Assistance $139,527 $0 $34,881 $174,409
2018 FTA (Sec
5307) Pennington Rapid City Transit Operating and Capital
Assistance for Fixed Route and Dial-A-Ride service
$1,321,153 $28,425 $871,896 $2,221,474
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 266
Funding Category
County Location of Project Type of Improvement FTA Funds
State Funds
Local Funds
Total Costs
FTA (Sec 5310)
Pennington Various agencies in the Rapid City Metropolitan Planning Area
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that provide services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$128,000 $0 $32,000 $160,000
FTA (Sec 5339)
Pennington Rapid City Metro Capital Assistance $145,592 $0 $36,398 $181,991
2019 FTA (Sec
5307) Pennington /
Meade Various agencies in the Rapid City Metropolitan Planning Area
Operating and Capital Assistance for Fixed Route and Dial-A-Ride service
$1,393,192 $28,425 $904,668 $2,326,285
FTA (Sec 5310)
Pennington Rapid City Transit Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that provide services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$128,000 $0 $32,000 $160,000
FTA (Sec 5339)
Pennington Rapid City Metro Capital Assistance $151,659 $0 $37,914 $189,574
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 267
2016 – 2019 Sioux Falls MPO Public Transportation Funding Category
County Location of Project Type of Improvement Federal Funds
Total Cost
2016 FTA
§ 5310 Lincoln
Minnehaha Various Agencies in the Sioux Falls Urbanized Area
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that Provide Services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$225,000 $281,250
FTA § 5310
Lincoln Minnehaha
Various Agencies in the Rural Area of the Sioux Falls MPA
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that Provide Services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$100,000 $125,000
FTA § 5339
Lincoln Minnehaha
Urban Transit Agencies (City of Sioux Falls) Capital Investment: Bus and Bus Related Equipment and Facilities
$285,000 $2,297,600
FTA § 5311
Lincoln Minnehaha
Rural Transit Agencies (Cites of Brandon and Hartford)
Operating expenses for rural transit providers
$50,000 $100,000
FTA § 5307
Minnehaha City of Sioux Falls (Sioux Area Metro) Operating Assistance $2,700,000 $8,437,400
2017 FTA
§ 5310 Lincoln
Minnehaha Various Agencies in the Sioux Falls Urbanized Area
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that Provide Services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$225,000 $281,250
FTA § 5310
Lincoln Minnehaha
Various Agencies in the Rural Area of the Sioux Falls MPA
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that Provide Services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$100,000 $125,000
FTA § 5339
Lincoln Minnehaha
Urban Transit Agencies (City of Sioux Falls) Capital Investment: Bus and Bus Related Equipment and Facilities
$285,000 $1,631,200
FTA § 5311
Lincoln Minnehaha
Rural Transit Agencies (Cites of Brandon and Hartford)
Operating expenses for rural transit providers
$50,000 $100,000
FTA § 5307
Minnehaha City of Sioux Falls (Sioux Area Metro) Operating Assistance $2,700,000 $8,357,700
2018 FTA
§ 5310 Lincoln
Minnehaha Various Agencies in the Sioux Falls Urbanized Area
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that Provide Services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$225,000 $281,250
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 268
Funding Category
County Location of Project Type of Improvement Federal Funds
Total Cost
FTA § 5310
Lincoln Minnehaha
Various Agencies in the Rural Area of the Sioux Falls MPA
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that Provide Services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$100,000 $125,000
FTA § 5339
Lincoln Minnehaha
Urban Transit Agencies (City of Sioux Falls) Capital Investment: Bus and Bus Related Equipment and Facilities
$285,000 $405,500
FTA § 5311
Lincoln Minnehaha
Rural Transit Agencies (Cites of Brandon and Hartford)
Operating expenses for rural transit providers
$50,000 $100,000
FTA § 5307
Minnehaha City of Sioux Falls (Sioux Area Metro) Operating Assistance $2,700,000 $8,400,200
2019 FTA
§ 5310 Lincoln
Minnehaha Various Agencies in the Sioux Falls Urbanized Area
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that Provide Services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$225,000 $281,250
FTA § 5310
Lincoln Minnehaha
Various Agencies in the Rural Area of the Sioux Falls MPA
Passenger vehicles for non-profit agencies that Provide Services to Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
$100,000 $125,000
FTA § 5339
Lincoln Minnehaha
Urban Transit Agencies (City of Sioux Falls) Capital Investment: Bus and Bus Related Equipment and Facilities
$285,000 $2,602,900
FTA § 5311
Lincoln Minnehaha
Rural Transit Agencies (Cites of Brandon and Hartford)
Operating expenses for rural transit providers
$50,000 $100,000
FTA § 5307
Minnehaha City of Sioux Falls (Sioux Area Metro) Operating Assistance $2,700,000 $8,919,200