Sources for Performance Data

42

description

Sources for Performance Data. Review of Summative NY State Assessment Results: End of Year Report (EOY) School Report Card Regional Comparisons – BOCES. Enrollment Data 2013-2014 EOY Sept. 13, 2014. Total Elementary Ungraded 8 Total Secondary Ungraded 13. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Sources for Performance Data

Page 1: Sources for Performance Data
Page 2: Sources for Performance Data

SOURCES FOR PERFORMANCE DATA

• Review of Summative NY State Assessment Results:• End of Year Report (EOY)• School Report Card• Regional Comparisons – BOCES

Page 3: Sources for Performance Data

ENROLLMENT DATA2013-2014 EOY SEPT. 13, 2014

Total

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

All 4,133

299 313 298 289 321 339 299 293 312 226 311 350 352

SWD 688 40 40 51 48 58 63 53 55 53 60 50 51 45

LEP 24 3 4 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 5 2 2 0

Total Elementary Ungraded 8Total Secondary Ungraded 13

Page 4: Sources for Performance Data

EAST GREENBUSH NY STATE ELA COMPARISON GRADES 3-8 SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Proficient0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

18

38

31

13

44

18

3633

13

46

32

37

22

9

31

32

37

22

9

31 District 2013District 2014Statewide 2013Statewide 2014

Page 5: Sources for Performance Data

2013 2014200

225

250

275

300

325

310.8333 310.3333

NYSED 3-8 ELA Common Core Assessment Suburban Council Average Mean Score

AVERILL PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTBALLSTON SPA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTBETHLEHEM CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTBURNT HILLS-BALLSTON LAKE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTEAST GREENBUSH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTGUILDERLAND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTNISKAYUNA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTNORTH COLONIE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTROTTERDAM-MOHONASEN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTSARATOGA SPRINGS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTSCOTIA-GLENVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTSHENENDEHOWA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTSOUTH COLONIE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Assessment Year

3-8

Mean S

core

Page 6: Sources for Performance Data

EAST GREENBUSH NY STATE MATH COMPARISON GRADES 3-8 SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Proficient0

10

20

30

40

50

60

14

3633

17

50

13

32 3223

55

3336

2110

31

3133

22

14

36District 2013District 2014Statewide 2013Statewide 2014

Page 7: Sources for Performance Data

2013 2014275

280

285

290

295

300

305

310

315

320

325

316.1666667

318.8333333

NYSED 3-8 Math Common Core Assessment Suburban Council Average Mean Score

AVERILL PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTBALLSTON SPA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTBETHLEHEM CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTBURNT HILLS-BALLSTON LAKE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTEAST GREENBUSH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTGUILDERLAND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTNISKAYUNA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTNORTH COLONIE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTROTTERDAM-MOHONASEN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTSARATOGA SPRINGS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTSCOTIA-GLENVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTSHENENDEHOWA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTSOUTH COLONIE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Assessment Year

3-8

Mean S

core

Page 8: Sources for Performance Data

2014 3-8 SUBURBAN COUNCIL ELA AND MATH ASSESSMENT RESULTS RANKED

ELA

Grades 3 4 5 6 7 8EGCSD Ranking out of 13 4th 5th 7th 4th 7th 7th

MATH

Grades 3 4 5 6 7 8EGCSD Ranking out of 13 8th 6th 1st 4th 7th 6th

Page 9: Sources for Performance Data

COMMON CORE AND REGENTS PERFORMANCE LEVELS

Common Core Assessments have 5 Performance LevelsRegents Assessments have 4 Performance Levels

CCS Algebra 1 CCS English Regents

Level 1 0-54 0-54 0-54

Level 2 55-64 55-64 55-64

Level 3 65-73 65- 78 65-84

Level 4 74 - 84 79 -84 85-100

Level 5 85 -100 85-100

Level 1 - Does not demonstrate the knowledge and skills for Level 2Level 2 – Not Proficient on Common Core Course Level ExpectationsLevel 3 – Graduation Proficiency ( Partially Meets Course- Level Expectations)Level 4 - Aspirational Performance Measures (Meets Common Core Course-Level Expectations)Level 5 – Exceeds Common Core Course-Level Expectations

Page 10: Sources for Performance Data

REGENTS VERSUS COMMON CORE ASSESSMENT ADMINISTRATION

• The ELA and math Common Core assessments for grades 3-8 began in 2013.

• In 2014, the first Common Core Regents exams were administered in math (Algebra I) and ELA, and the students enrolled in Common Core courses have the option to take Regents in addition to the new Common Core test and have the higher score count for grading and other purposes.

• The Common Core Regents exam in Geometry will be administered for the first time in 2015.

• The Common Core Algebra II exam will be administered for the first time in 2016.

Page 11: Sources for Performance Data

HOW MANY REGENTS/COMMON CORE ASSESSMENTS MUST YOU PASS TO GRADUATE WITH

A REGENTS DIPLOMA

• Regents Diploma - a score of 65 or better is required on these Regents exams:

• Comprehensive English• Mathematics (Any one)• Global History• US History• Science (Any one)• Language other than English

Page 12: Sources for Performance Data

HOW MANY REGENTS/COMMON CORE ASSESSMENTS MUST YOU PASS TO GRADUATE WITH

A REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION

• Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation - a score of 65 or better is required on these Regents exams:

• Comprehensive English• Mathematics (All three)• Global History• US History• Science (One physical and one life science)• Language other than English

• Advanced Placement – College Board curriculum with possible college credit.

• College in The High School or Articulated Agreement – Transfers to multiple colleges or to the college with the articulated agreement.

Page 13: Sources for Performance Data

REGENTS EXAM SUNSET SCHEDULE AND COMMON CORE ASSESSMENT ADMINISTRATION

• CC ELA and Geometry given on June 2nd (Not during Regents week)

• ELA Regents – Sunsets January 2015 – EGCSD was only planning on giving ELA Common Core in January 2015. Commissioner’s Memo 10/10 indicates that the Regents availability may not sunset until August 2015.

• Geometry Regents – Sunsets January 2016. Both Regents and CC will be administered and the highest score credited.

• Algebra Regents – Sunsets January 2015. CC Algebra I given during Regents week.

Page 14: Sources for Performance Data

COMPARISON: 2012-2013, 2013- 2014 REGENTS INTEGRATED ALGEBRA 1 /COMPARISON: 2014 REGENTS INTEGRATED

ALGEBRA 1 AND COMMON CORE ALGEBRA 1

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 2.12 1.6 7.4

61 57.448.4

36 39 33.6

97 96.4 90.5

8.5

Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 Exceeds CCProficient

Page 15: Sources for Performance Data

EAST GREENBUSH CSDSCHOOL YEAR COMPARISON: 2012-2013, 2013-14

REGENTS GEOMETRY, REGENTS ALGEBRA/TRIGONOMETRY

020406080

100

0 0 3 1.60 0.9 4 4.3

5046.5 43 41.450 52.5 50 52.7

100 99 93 94.1

Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Proficient

Page 16: Sources for Performance Data

EAST GREENBUSH CSD SCHOOL YEAR COMPARISON: 2012-2013, 2013-2014 REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY,

U.S. HISTORY AND GOVERNMENT

020406080

100

5 4.9 1 1.48 7.5 2 1.4

35 38.723 25.4

52 48.874 71.8

87 87.597 97.2

Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Proficient

Page 17: Sources for Performance Data

EAST GREENBUSH CSDSCHOOL YEAR COMPARISON: 2012-2013, 2013-2014

REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT, REGENTS EARTH SCIENCE

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 19 7.36

22

9 8.9

45 42 4538.3

4854

3745.6

93 96

82 83.9

Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Proficient

Page 18: Sources for Performance Data

EAST GREENBUSH CSDSCHOOL YEAR COMPARISON: 2012-2013, 2013-2014

REGENTS PHYSICS, REGENTS CHEMISTRY

Regents Physics 2013

Regents Physics 2014

Regents Chemistry

2013

Regents Chemistry

2014

0102030405060708090

100

11 9.6 7 4

36 38.2

56 58.750 49.3

36 37.3

86 87.592 96

Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Proficient

Page 19: Sources for Performance Data

COMPARISON: 2012-2013, 2013-2014 REGENTS ENGLISHCOMPARISON: 2014 REGENTS ENGLISH AND

COMMON CORE ENGLISH

020406080

100

1 2 3.92 2.6 3.2

5240.2

21.4

4555.1

24.9

97 95.3 92.9

46.6

Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 Exceeds CCProficient

Page 20: Sources for Performance Data

FIVE YEAR TREND 8TH GRADE STUDENTS ENROLLED INHIGH SCHOOL ALGEBRA/EARTH SCIENCE

Enrollment in 8th Grade High School Course

Algebra Earth Science Living Environment

2009-2010 74 53

2010-2011 73 54

2011-2012 54 50

2012-2013 63 55

2013-2014 58 56

2014-2015 35 52

Decrease in Algebra enrollment in 2013-2014 attributed to increased rigor associated with CC and in 2014-2015 decreased student enrollment and Increased consistency in the application of the entrance criteria based on student performance in the high

school.

Page 21: Sources for Performance Data

FIVE YEAR TREND STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ADVANCED PLACEMENT CLASSES

Course Name 2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

2014-2015

AP Psychology 3

English 11 AP 27 24 13

English 12 19 16 14 13 23 17

Int. Calculus H AP I 38 32 33 43 35 43

Int. Calculus H AP II 35 29 24 39 23 43

Calculus I AP H 14 10 13 18 20 13

Calculus II AP H 14 10 13 18 20 13

European History AP 22 17 29 20 17 21

American History AP 59 72 68 71 81 49

Economics AP 27 12 16 30 18 30

Page 22: Sources for Performance Data

FIVE YEAR TREND STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ADVANCED PLACEMENT CLASSES

Course Name 2009-2010 2010-2011

2011-2012

2013-2014

2014-2015

2015-2016

World History I AP 49 48 57 45 47 55

World History 2 AP 45 43 47 53 45 45

AP Environmental Science

31 11 9 15 14 21

Physics AP H 13 14 11 17 11 12

Biology AP H 30 9 20 18 23 22

Chemistry AP 21 26 33 26 30 30

Total 417 349 387 453 434 427

Page 23: Sources for Performance Data

FIVE YEAR GRADUATION RATES

Year/Cohort Columbia District Wide

August 2009 - Cohort 2005

84.83% 83.01%

August 2010 - Cohort 2006

88.33% 87.41%

August 2011 - Cohort 2007

95.04% 94.02%

August 2012 - Cohort 2008

94.12% 93.14%

August 2013 - Cohort 2009

91.29% 90.24%

June 2014 - Cohort 2010 *

92.50% 92.00%

On the School Report Card the graduation numbers always come out the year after the students graduate. * 2013-2014 will be reported in 2014-2015 School Report Card

Page 24: Sources for Performance Data

REWARD STATUS

With this year’s ESEA waiver amendments Reward Schools will now be determined based on the following:

1. Reviewing graduation rates for students who begin high school at Levels 1 and 2. 2. Percentages of students who receive Regents diplomas with advanced designation and Career and Technical Education endorsements3. In elementary and middle schools, growth of students whose growth percentiles the previous year placed them in the bottom quartile for their school.

Page 25: Sources for Performance Data

Bethlehem Niskayuna Saratoga Springs

North Colonie

Guidlerland Shen East Greenbush

Burnt Hills Ballston

Lake

South Colonie

Averill Park Ballston Spa

Rotterdam-Mohonasen

Scotia-Glenville

2013 0.727 0.696 0.579 0.638 0.616 0.573 0.648 0.652 0.487 0.441 0.526 0.448 0.475

2012 0.749 0.795 0.583 0.66 0.628 0.603 0.683 0.613 0.415 0.372 0.421 0.56 0.515

2011 0.65 0.67 0.57 0.629 0.639 0.606 0.524 0.623 0.347 0.4 0.436 0.479 0.413

5.00%

15.00%

25.00%

35.00%

45.00%

55.00%

65.00%

75.00%

85.00%

95.00%

Suburban Council Aspirational Performance Levels S

tud

en

ts S

co

rin

g A

sp

irati

on

al

Perf

orm

an

ce L

evels

in

ELA

an

d M

ath

Page 26: Sources for Performance Data

Bethlehem Niskayuna Saratoga Springs

North Colonie

Guidlerland Shen East Green-bush

Burnt Hills Ballston

Lake

South Colonie

Averill Park Ballston Spa

Rotterdam-Mohonasen

Scotia-Glenville

2013 0.574 0.616 0.459 0.571 0.544 0.532 0.458 0.584 0.487 0.403 0.503 0.352 0.48

2012 0.561 0.639 0.464 0.589 0.567 0.577 0.493 0.534 0.454 0.3 0.438 0.35 0.515

2011 0.568 0.545 0.502 0.663 0.596 0.537 0.427 0.537 0.51 0.318 0.461 0.338 0.417

5.00%

15.00%

25.00%

35.00%

45.00%

55.00%

65.00%

75.00%

85.00%

95.00%

Suburban Council Advanced Regents DiplomasS

tud

en

ts r

ece

ivin

g a

dv

an

ce

d r

eg

en

ts d

iplo

ma

s

Page 27: Sources for Performance Data

Bethle-hem

Niskayuna Saratoga Springs

North Colonie

Guidler-land

Shen East Green-bush

Burnt Hills Ballston

Lake

South Colonie

Averill Park

Ballston Spa

Rotter-dam-Mo-honasen

Scotia-Glenville

NYS

2013 0.02 0 0.05 0 0.04 0 0.03 0 0 0.02 0 0.05 0.03 0.03

1%

3%

5%

7%

9%

Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement

Stu

den

ts r

eceiv

ing

reg

en

ts d

iplo

mas w

ith

CT

E E

nd

ors

em

en

t

26 StudentsBOCES

Page 28: Sources for Performance Data

CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION

Concentrators Participants Enrollee

Columbia 45 42 212

Questar 33 24 1

Total 78 66 213

Enrollee Local High School – Has begun instruction in any CTE courseEnrollee BOCES - Has begun instruction in any CTE courseParticipant Local High School – Has completed one CTE course equivalent to one full school year.Participant BOCES- Has completed one third of his or her programConcentrators Local High School – Has completed at least two sequenced CTE courses equivalent to two full school year courses out of a three concentrationConcentrators BOCES – Has successfully completed two thirds of his or her program

Page 29: Sources for Performance Data

CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION

CTE Graduates Technical Assessments

26 CNACriminal JusticeAIT ( Information Technology) Automotive Tech, Cosmetology HVACCulinary Construction TechAviation

Page 30: Sources for Performance Data

EGCSD STEM DEVELOPMENT AND CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENTS

Course NY State Approved Terminal Exam

AIT (Information Technology) A+ Certification

CNA I, II ( Network Administration)

Network + Certification

Engineering Student Electronics Technician

Criminal Justice Not Identified

Page 31: Sources for Performance Data

KEN WAGNER , NYSED DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT AND EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY

AND BOE REGENTS AGENDA

• Multiple pathways to graduation for college and career readiness:• High School • Certificate Program • AA/AS • BA BS Degrees

• 12% of NY State high school students concentrate in a CTE field

• 29% of NY State high school students take at least one CTE course

• Percentage increases in high needs, rural and large city districts

Page 32: Sources for Performance Data

KEN WAGNER, NYSED DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT AND EDUCATION

TECHNOLOGY AND BOE REGENTS AGENDA

• CTE Program Approval Process• Curriculum aligned with state and national learning

standards, career pathways leading to degrees and credentials.

• Technical assessment that meets industry standards• Post secondary articulation agreements constructed to

provide students with direct benefits such as college credit or advanced standing

• Work based learning opportunities

Page 33: Sources for Performance Data

KEN WAGNER, NYSED DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT AND EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY

AND BOE REGENTS AGENDA

• Shift from 5 Regents to 4 Regents and 1 Career Path Exam.• Four required Regents:• Living Environment• Algebra 1• English 3• One Social Studies

• Career Path Exams:• Arts, CTE, Humanities, STEM

Page 34: Sources for Performance Data

HOW DO EFFECTIVE AND HIGHLY EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS IMPROVE PERFORMANCE

• Data Driven Instruction• Observation and Feedback• Instructional Planning• Professional Development• Student Culture• Staff Culture• Managing School Leadership Teams

• Paul Bambrick Santoyo

Page 35: Sources for Performance Data
Page 36: Sources for Performance Data

WHAT IS DATA DRIVEN INSTRUCTION?

• Formative, interim and summative assessment data is analyzed by individual teachers and groups of teachers across content and grade levels.

• Results are disaggregated by subgroups and individual students.

• Outcomes are used to adjust instruction and curriculum on an ongoing basis to improve student learning outcomes.

Page 37: Sources for Performance Data

STUDENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

• College and Career Readiness is not reducible to test scores. • Ken Wagner , Deputy Commissioner Office of

Curriculum Assessment and Education Technology 10/10/2014

• Student performance is not improved by re-teaching test questions and State Assessments are not the best tool for improving performance.

• Best use of State Assessments is to conduct item response analysis by CCLS bundles by building, subgroup and individual performance levels to identify GAPS across subgroups and the district and the state.

• Data Analysis Technical Assistance Center

Page 38: Sources for Performance Data

LOCAL ASSISTANCE PLAN GOFF MIDDLE SCHOOL

• Gap between Growth Rate (Performance Index) of general education students and students with disabilities.

• 100 point GAP for 30 or more students with disabilities• 100 point GAP for 40 or more students from all other

subgroups

• Students with disabilities made the Annual Yearly Performance (AYP) benchmarks set by SED.

• NYSED Requires a District led internal audit using the Diagnostic Tool for School District Effectiveness resulting in the development of a Local Assistance Plan.

Page 39: Sources for Performance Data

ACTIONS THE DISTRICT TAKE TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL STUDENTS AND SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE

1. Curriculum mapping and interim assessment development K- 8 ELA and math.

2. Provide professional development to build teacher capacity

3. Development of a Local Assistance Plan for Goff.

4. Provide more granular data to the principals and teachers for instructional decision making

5. Continue to develop targeted supports and interventions

Page 40: Sources for Performance Data

SAMPLE DATA ANALYSIS OF CCLS PERFORMANCE BANDS 4TH GRADE LEVEL 2 ELA

RI.4.2 RI.4.3 RI.4.5 RI.4.8 RI.4.9 RI.4.2 RI.4.3 RI.4.1 RI.4.2 RI.4.3 RI.4.4 RI.4.5 RI.4.8 RL.4.1 RL.4.2 RL.4.3 RL.4.4 RL.4.5 RL.4.6 RL.4.7 L.4.4a L.4.5a

0 50 0 50 50 50 50 0 100 50 100 0 50 60 100 100 33.3 0 0 100 0 0

50 50 50 50 50 16.7 25 75 50 50 0 100 100 40 66.7 66.7 33.3 0 100 100 0 0

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 75 0 100 0 0 50 60 33.3 33.3 66.7 0 0 0 100 100

50 50 50 50 50 66.7 75 50 50 0 0 0 50 60 0 66.7 33.3 0 100 100 0 100

50 100 50 50 50 33.3 50 75 50 100 0 0 50 60 66.7 33.3 66.7 0 100 0 100 0

50 50 50 50 50 33.3 50 75 50 0 100 100 0 80 66.7 66.7 33.3 100 100 0 100 0

0 50 50 50 50 16.7 50 75 100 50 100 100 50 80 66.7 33.3 66.7 0 100 100 100 0

50 50 50 75 50 50 50 75 0 50 0 0 50 60 100 66.7 33.3 100 100 100 100 0

50 0 50 100 25 33.3 50 75 50 0 100 100 50 60 66.7 100 33.3 0 100 100 100 100

50 100 50 25 25 50 75 75 50 50 0 100 0 100 66.7 66.7 66.7 0 100 0 0 100

100 50 50 75 50 66.7 50 25 50 50 0 0 50 40 100 33.3 100 100 100 100 100 0

50 0 0 50 25 50 50 75 100 100 100 0 50 100 33.3 100 66.7 100 100 0 100 100

67.9 100 100 75 50 66.7 50 75 0 50 0 100 0 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 0 100 100 100 0

50 50 50 75 50 33.3 100 100 100 100 0 0 100 60 33.3 66.7 33.3 0 100 0 100 0

50 100 0 50 75 66.7 75 75 0 50 0 100 50 60 100 66.7 100 100 100 0 0 0

50 50 50 50 50 83.3 50 75 50 100 100 0 50 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 0 100 100 100 0

0 50 50 50 75 50 25 100 50 50 0 100 50 100 66.7 66.7 66.7 0 100 100 100 100

100 100 50 25 75 66.7 75 100 50 100 0 100 50 60 66.7 66.7 66.7 0 100 0 0 0

100 50 0 50 25 50 75 100 100 50 0 100 50 80 66.7 66.7 100 0 100 0 100 100

Page 41: Sources for Performance Data

KEN WAGNER, NYSED DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT AND EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY

• When the local diploma was eradicated the students earning Regents Diplomas increased by 5%

• Graduation rates are increasing across the state but advanced designation graduation rates are flat at about 31%. (13-14 56% EGCSD District – 57% Columbia)

• ELL only subgroup whose graduation rate is decreasing across the last 5 year except for those ELL not receiving services in their terminal year.

• Statewide 94% of cohort students begin their senior only 81% graduate.

Page 42: Sources for Performance Data

KEN WAGNER, NYSED DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF CURRICULUM, ASSESSMENT AND EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY

• Our current 5th grade class is the first class to have been exposed to the common core in kindergarten. (Adopted 2010)

• These same students will arrive in high school with 8 years of common core exposure.

• The safety net remains for SWD

• There are changes coming to the Global and US History Assessment Process – 1 year exam rather than 2 year, no DBQ.