Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

21
Indirect effects in a desert plant community: do nurse-plants mediate interactions between understorey species? Diego A. Sotomayor 1 and Christopher J. Lortie 1,2 1 Department of Geography, York University, Toronto 2 Department of Biology, York University, Toronto

description

A presentation during the 2014 ESA Annual Meeting in Sacramento. Look inside if you interested in plant interactions and deserts.

Transcript of Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Page 1: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Indirect effects in a desert plant community: do nurse-plants mediate interactions between understorey species?

Diego A. Sotomayor1 and Christopher J. Lortie1,2

1 Department of Geography, York University, Toronto2 Department of Biology, York University, Toronto

Page 2: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

integrated community concept

Lortie et al 2004, Callaway 1995, 1997, Pugnaire & Luque 2000

Page 3: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Bruno et al. 2003

Page 4: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Year

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Publ

icat

ions

/yea

r

0

50

100

150

200

250FacilitationIndirect interactions

Recognition of facilitation within ecological theory, however indirect interactions have lagged behind

Page 5: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Strauss 1991, Callaway 2007, Sotomayor & Lortie (in review)

Page 6: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Dominant plants in stressful environments should mediate the outcome of interactions in their understory

Callaway 2007

+ +-

+

Page 7: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Field site

Atiquipa, Peru (15oS)Private reserve

Coastal desert location ~ 200 mm rainfall/year

Winter growing season

Fog

Elevation gradient

Page 8: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Experimental design

Plantago limensis

Fuertisimalva peruviana

Caesalpinia spinosa

Page 9: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Neighbors present

Neighbors removed

Page 10: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Results Plantago limensis

A C D E

Num

ber o

f fru

its/p

lant

0

50

100

150

200

A B C D E0

50

100

150

200

2011

2012

ELEVATION

A C D E

Plan

t hei

ght (

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

A B C D E0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011

2012

A B C D EB

iom

ass

(g)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2012

O - neighborsO + neighborsU - neighborsU + neighbors

Page 11: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

O - neighborsO + neighborsU - neighborsU + neighbors

A C D E

Num

ber o

f fru

its/p

lant

0

50

100

150

200

A B C D E0

50

100

150

200

2011

2012

Num

ber

of fr

uits

/pla

nt

A C D E

A B C D E

Page 12: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

O - neighborsO + neighborsU - neighborsU + neighbors

A C D E

Plan

t hei

ght (

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

A B C D E0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011

2012

A B C D E

A C D E

Plan

t he

ight

(cm

)

Page 13: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

O - neighborsO + neighborsU - neighborsU + neighbors

A B C D E

Bio

mas

s (g

)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2012

A B C D E

Biom

ass

(g)

Page 14: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Fuertisimalva peruviana

O - neighborsO + neighborsU - neighborsU + neighbors

A B C E

Num

ber o

f fru

its/p

lant

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

A C D E0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2011

2012

A B C E

Plan

t hei

ght (

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

A C D E0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011

2012

A B C D EB

iom

ass

(g)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12 2012

ELEVATION

Page 15: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

O - neighborsO + neighborsU - neighborsU + neighbors

A B C E

Num

ber o

f fru

its/p

lant

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

A C D E0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2011

2012

Num

ber

of f

ruits

/pla

nt

A B C E

A C D E

Page 16: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

O - neighborsO + neighborsU - neighborsU + neighbors

A B C E

Plan

t hei

ght (

cm)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

A C D E0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011

2012

Plan

t he

ight

(cm

)

A B C E

A C D E

Page 17: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

O - neighborsO + neighborsU - neighborsU + neighbors

A B C D E

Bio

mas

s (g

)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12 2012

A B C D E

Biom

ass

(g)

Page 18: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

ImplicationsContrasting effects of shrubs for other deserts on the

competition intensity of understory plants

Tielborger & Kadmon 2000, Schöb et al. 2013, Soliveres et al. 2011

Page 19: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Dominant plants mediate species-specific effects in their understory, within the over-arching

positive effect of their canopy

Page 20: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

Acknowledgments and collaborators

Universidad Nacional de San Agustín, PeruFrancisco Villasante, Italo Revilla, Briggeth Flores, Jessica Turpo, Paola Medina

York University, CanadaDepartment of Geography and Faculty of Graduate Studies

Page 21: Sotomayor & Lortie ESA talk 2014

THANK [email protected]