Sony Evolution of Leadership
-
Upload
abigail-yang -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.326 -
download
0
Transcript of Sony Evolution of Leadership
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
University of College Dublin
Bachelor of Business Studies
(Singapore)
Management of Organizations (BMGT2002S)
Assignment 2
SONY – Evolution of Leadership
Name: Abigail Catherine Yang Wenjie
UCD Student ID: 14208093
Class/Batch: FT BBS 22C
Submission Date: 10th July 2015
Lecturer: Dr Emily Chua
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Executive Summary
This short paper is commissioned to examine the hybrid leadership style used by
Sony current CEO by analysing strengths and weakness as well as evaluating its
influence and effectiveness towards the future of Sony Corporation.
The research draws attention to the fact Sony has been making losses since 1995 till
to date caused by a change of leadership style that does not leverage on its core
competency of innovation and technology, does not align with the organization vision
and mission and conflicts with the Japanese culture massive restructuring through
laying off employees, selling away their profitable businesses and reducing
production line. Over the past 10 years Sony has lose its market share to
competitors like Samsung, LG and Toshiba and lose its competitive advantage in the
electronics goods industry, where they used to be called a company that was once
the premier creator and manufacturer of electronic products. Further Investigations
reveal response from media and members of the public over current leadership style
in Sony remains neutral, some who are supportive in his new strategic direction of
unifying various divisions as “One Sony” without changing its DNA whereas some
remain sceptical on its feasibility.
The strategy considered for implementation is to apply a transformational leadership
style, creating new organizational goals, new vision and mission in order to create a
new direction and new competitive advantage whereby employees are motivated
and convicted to follow. The real challenge of enforcing transformational leadership
in a Japanese organization that is deeply rooted in its culture is for the current CEO
to convince the entire organization that they truly need to evolve.
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Table of Contents
Page No. 1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background of Sony 1 1.2 The Vision 1 1.3 The Mission 2
2.0 Industries
2.1 Industry Portfolio 2 2.2 Current Businesses 2 2.3 Current Competitors 3
3.0 Current Leadership
3.1 Background of Kazuo Hirai 3 3.2 The “Transitional” Phase 4 3.3 Evaluating its Effectiveness 5
4.0 Assess the Strengths and Weakness of Current Leadership
4.1 Motivation 4.1.1 A Positive Working Environment 5 4.1.2 Establishing Relationships 6 4.1.3 Developing Talents 7
4.2 Team Dynamics 4.2.1 Current Organization Form 7 4.2.2 Organizational Culture 8 4.2.3 Influence of Attitudes and Behaviours 9
4.3 Planning and Management 4.3.1 The Importance of Planning and Management 9 4.3.2 Sony’s Current Planning and Management 10 4.3.3 Effectiveness of Current Leadership 10
4.4 Strategy and Decision Making 4.4.1 Hirai’s Strategy and Decision Making Process 11
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
4.4.2 Evaluation on Its Effectiveness 11 5.0 Effectiveness of Current Leadership towards Sony’s Future
5.1 Comparison of Financial Ratios 12 5.2 The Cause of Inefficient Leadership 13
6.0 Recommendations
6.1 The Solution – Transformation 14 6.2 A New Beginning 14 6.3 The 5 I’s of Transformational Aspect 15
7.0 Conclusion 16 8.0 Reference List and Bibliography 17-22 9.0 Appendixes
8.1 Appendix A - Market Share Analysis 23 8.2 Appendix B - Competitor Financials 24-26 8.3 Appendix C - Board of Directors and Key Employees 27-31 8.4 Appendix D - Current Organization Structure 32 8.5 Appendix E - Consolidated Statement of Income 33-39
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background of Sony
Peter F. Drucker once said that “Management is doing things right whereas
leadership is doing the right things.” In 1946, when Masaru Ibuka and Akio Morita set
up Tokyo Telecommunications Engineering Corporation (currently known as Sony
Corporation) and became one of the pioneers in the industry, it also marked the
beginning of their leadership success. The company got on track with high
aspirations and great confidence in the 20 technologically capable engineers they
had, and became one of the most reputable mega technological giants in Japan. In
1958 the company name was changed to Sony Corporation. Over the years several
candidates had been elected as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and in 1st April 2012,
the current CEO Kazuo Hirai their took over the leadership role of the conglomerate.
(Sony, 2015)
1.2 The Vision
First founders Masaru Ibuka and Akio Morita knew that they had a team of dedicated
and motivated engineers who shared the same aspirations. They thought of ways to
unite each of them, encouraging them to embrace a firm cooperative spirit and
unleash their technological capabilities without any reserve. They were clear of the
vision they had for Sony, to "Become the leading global provider of networked
consumer electronics, entertainment and services”. To them, nothing was more
important than being a company that inspires with their technological spirit. (Sony,
2015)
1.3 The Mission
The corporate culture of Sony was very different from other typical Japanese
organizations. Rather than establishing a system of control, Ibuka created a pleasant
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
working atmosphere, turning it into a dynamic workplace with an open-minded
corporate culture. He created Sony’s mission statement, that is “to become a leading
global provider of networked consumer electronics, entertainment and services”. For
many years, Sony retained their vision and mission until Kazuo Hirai, the current
CEO tried to change the company direction by shifting its focus to new businesses
and unifying the company under his “One Sony” plan. This marked the beginning of
his transactional leadership moves in Sony. (Wakabayashi, 2012)
2.0 Industries
2.1 Industry Portfolio
Sony has a diverse industry portfolio. They are involved in electronics, games,
music, movies and financial services. With a passion to create new markets, Sony
was an early creator and dominator of consumer electronics and became famous for
being the creator of “Walkman” and “Discman” in 1979 and the world’s first portable
TV in 1960. Sony’s breakthrough in technology and innovation became their platform
to enter the international markets. According to Forbes, (2015) although Sony faces
challenges from competitors, its strong brand equity and corporate image remains in
the hearts of their loyal supporters.
2.2 Current Businesses
Sony only focuses on 3 main industries; entertainment, games and electronics at
present. Warmen, (2014) commented that ever since the previous CEO Nobuyuki
Idei took over the leadership role in 1997, he changed the entire structure of Sony’s
operations, deviating from the original organization vision and mission which was set
by the early founders, that is to pursue innovation and creativity, and to develop new
technologies and products. Thereafter, his style of leadership was adopted by the
CEOs who succeeded him. According to Adelstein and Stucky (2012), it was evident
that this change caused Sony to lose its competitiveness which resulted in the
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
company making huge losses. Having lost millions over the years, the current CEO
Hirai decided to focus on manufacturing products instead of pioneering new markets
as reliable products of quality used to be their core competence, and that is what
consumers still seek for.
2.3 Current Competitors
In today’s competitive business environment, organizations without a competitive
advantage and strong leadership will lag behind in the industry. (Khan and Adnan,
2014) Sony faces strong competitors in every sector of their business. Big players
like Panasonic, Philips, Sharp, Toshiba, Samsung and LG already hold bigger
market shares than Sony. Countries like Korea, Taiwan and US have also outshone
Sony in terms of technology and innovation. With respect to the games industry,
Microsoft and Nintendo are the 2 other major players that are competing with Sony’s
Playstation. As Maznevski, and Chudoba (2000) have mentioned, organizations face
multiple challenges in today’s market. As such, survival in the present competitive
environment requires prudent and well planned strategies that help to improve
operational performance and create its competitive advantage. (Please refer to
APPENDIX A and APPENDIX B for current market share and competitor financials)
3.0 Current Leadership
3.1 Background of Kazuo Hirai
Current Sony Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Kazuo Hirai who took over the reins
since 2012 was 24 years old when he first joined Sony. Born in Tokyo in the 1960s,
he studied in an American university in Japan and graduated with a bachelor’s
degree in Liberal Arts. His father was a banker who worked in U.S and his family
lives in Canada therefore since young had the opportunity to travel too and fro these
places, allowing him to pick up fluent English language skills. According to
Bloomberg, (2015) he began his career with Sony Inc. (previously CBS) in 1984. His
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
strategic and intellectual competency in his work performance helped him rose
through the ranks and moved to Sony Music Japan’s New York office, where he led
the Sony Computer Entertainment Japan’s international business affairs. His years
of hard work and perseverance paid off when he was appointed as the president and
CEO of Sony in 2012. According to Alabaster, (2012) he was known as a charismatic
veteran who has been groom to lead Sony. The fact that Hirai’s bilingual and
bicultural background, and training under Howard Stringer has shaped him to
become who he is today. Like previous CEO Howard Stringer, he also felt that Sony
needs to go through restructuring and cut down its loss but the “DNA” of Sony will
remain.
3.2 The “Transitional” Phase
Sony has been making losses since 1995 during ex-CEO Nobuyuki Idei’s era and
ex-CEO Howard Stringer’s era. When Hirai was made CEO, he was tasked with the
mission of reviving Sony and it back to its competitiveness in its products. In an
interview with Wall Street Journal, (2015) Hirai affirmed Sony’s commitment to
innovation, commitment to bringing out new products whether it’s software or
hardware contents or services, and their commitment to touch the emotions of
consumers will not change, however at the same time, he was challenged with
conflicting thoughts. He knew that to achieve corporate objectives, he would have to
implement huge changes to Sony by adopting his own leadership style but at the
same time, he was faced with the same issue like the 2 CEOs before him, and that is
to retain Sony’s culture (Sanchez-Runde et al., 2011)
In the case of Sony’s current leadership, it is likely that Hirai has adopted a mixture
of leadership styles. During the time of his leadership, Patel, (2015) mentioned that
Sony was no longer an electronics company because Hirai sold away the company’s
VIAOs personal computer unit and announced he would spin off the TV and Audio
businesses into a wholly owned subsidiary. Hirai further comment he may consider
to sell off Sony’s Smartphone and TV businesses entirely and focus more on the
media and gaming units because he hopes to achieve his plans of reducing loss and
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
regaining profits. The rationale behind his actions reminds us of what ex-CEO
Howard Stringer had in mind, and that was to reduce loss.
3.3 Evaluating Its Effectiveness
Things may be looking up for Sony at the moment under Kazuo Hirai’s leadership
but in the long run, the future of Sony is still highly uncertain. Since its establishment,
Sony successfully created an incredible brand name, however, its legend seem to
fall apart ever since the past CEOs restructured the company as prior to that,
strategic issues arose, and caused the company to experience declining profits.
According to Bloomberg, (2012) since Hirai took over the leadership role, he started
executing his restructuring plan by closing down several factories, laying off
employees, reducing the production of TVs and selling away VIAOs personal
computer unit. It was because he had in mind his “One Sony” concept thus he
believes that he should cut down on the operating cost of products that weren’t
making profits, sell away products that weren’t making profit and accumulate funds
to focuses on the 3 main industries; entertainment, games and electronics. On top of
that, Hussain, (2012) said, that Hirai spent millions of dollars to acquisit cloud
gaming venture, medical equipment manufacturers and bailout of Olympus, claiming
that these were part of his plans to revive Sony. Hirai’s acquisition strategy appears
to be different from the previous CEO however it still did not leverage on the core
competency of Sony. Although the changes in practices were suppose to help steer
Sony towards growth but somehow there isn’t enough evidence to justify whether
these changes are successful or not.
4.0 Assess The Strengths and Weaknesses of Current Leadership
4.1 Motivation
4.1.1 A Positive Working Environment
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Like what Khan and Adnan, (2014) mentioned, leadership style does matter
and contribute towards overall performance of any organization. It also plays
a significant role in motivating and enhancing individuals and organizational
performance. For the case of Sony, Smith, (2011) identified how Hirai
managed to keep his employees motivated by providing a positive working
environment. As the CEO, he abides by human rights which involves the
safety, healthy and efficient working environment. To prevent discrimination
among their diverse group of employees, he established the Diversity
committee which reports directly to him, and formulated the Diversity Policy as
a common diversity statement for Sony Group. (Sony, 2015) and established a
rewards system whereby employees’ gets rewarded based on their individual
performance and implemented the “Flexi Hours Scheme” so that employees
get to spend time with their families, for he knew that having such schemes
allows employees to satisfy their physiological and safety needs. (Lee et al,
2014)
4.1.2 Establishing Relationships
Apart from having a good working environment, Lee et al, (2014) also note
that under current leadership, employees could be assigned to higher level of
the company based on their performance. Communication among employees
is enhanced through team-based working environment as Hirai believes in
engaging everyone to establish relationships. Through engagement,
employees are highly motivated as they are shaped to believe they are valued
by the company, satisfying the belonging, self esteem and self actualization
needs. Like what Warman, (2014) mentioned, the current leadership strategy
of unifying the different divisions through the “One Sony” concept had
somehow created a positive drive in employees and led them to generate
more ideas.
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
However, all these mentioned will only occur if the higher management
acknowledges the efforts of the employee, for under the current leadership
“laying off employees” that are deem as incompetent is still inevitable.
4.1.3 Developing Talents
To react to ongoing loss, Hirai tried to salvage the situation by laying off
workers. This decision caused many employees to feel insecure and greatly
damaged their morale. As such it prevents Sony from retaining good
employees and attracting new talents for culturally, Japanese are known to be
loyal to their company and will work till retirement. In certain aspect,
Wakabayashi, (2012) commented, that the current leadership style and
change in corporate culture caused some employees to go through
psychological distress which may affect their work performance.
Despite so, Hirai also understands the importance of retaining Sony’s “human
assets” and emphasized the career development scheme for those
employees who displayed outstanding performance. Lee et al, (2014)
mentioned, under current leadership, Sony provides training and career
development which can give employees a chance to get higher level of
position at work. Selected candidates will be sent to Sony University where
they train and develop skills of the managers and senior executives, for Hirai
believed by investing on their managers and equipping them with additional
set of skills enables them to create a better and efficient working environment.
4.2 Team Dynamics
4.2.1 Current Organization Structure
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
According to Chatterji et al, (2012) Hirai announced a new management
structure with effect on the day he officially took over the CEO position. He
mentioned these changes were intended to drive revitalization and growth
across Sony’s core electronics business, deliver compelling user experiences
through convergence of the unique assets in place throughout the Sony
Group. To achieve that, he reorganized Sony into three primary divisions
namely Sony Electronics, Sony Entertainment, Sony Financial Services and
unite the Global Sales & Marketing, Corporate R&D, Manufacturing,
Logistics, Procurement & Quality, into common platforms, retaining the old
reporting style. Ultimately, he believes these changes will help to establish
rapid and optimized decision making process as “One Sony”, which will
significantly reinforce and accelerate Sony’s overall business management.
(Sony, 2012)
Despite implementing all these changes, the hierarchical functional structure
of typical Japanese companies remained. Kimura, (2012) commented,
Japanese firms widely exhibit political behaviours especially factional disputes
and slow decision making process all because of the tall hierarchy in the
organization therefore to complement the new management structure, the tall
hierarchy have to be eliminated. (Please see Appendix B for
.
4.2.2 Organization Culture
It has been noticed by Chatterji et al, (2012) that the new management team
is made up of key executives who were responsible for the past successes of
Sony therefore it showed evidence that Sony’s culture places a high premium
on consensus building and longevity. As Hirai personally advocates culture
diversity thus the Sony board of directors not only comprised of selected
members of the executive management committee and non-employee
veterans where among them, some of them were from different nationality.
The current management team has broad industry experience, whereas the
board of directors also have vast industry experience and seemed to be a
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
power top management team but the mid to lower level employees thought
otherwise. As the traditional Japanese culture values were deeply rooted in
the minds of the veterans, many continued to oppose the changes that Hirai
had made.
4.2.3 Influence of Attitudes and Behaviours
According to Alabaster, (2012) Hirai was classified as a charismatic leader
and enjoys building rapport with his employees. Although he knew that not
everyone in Sony approved of the changes he had done to the organization,
he maintained his cool and continued his employer-to-staff interaction. His
positive attitude somehow paid off sometime in January 2015, when derailed
launch of “The Interview” movie in United States was hacked by cyber
hackers and caused a great hassle. Graaf, (2015) said that in the entire
incident Hirai took his stand and commented his employees were the victims
of ‘a vicious and malicious cyber-attack. Despite facing various speculations
from media and public that the hacker could be someone from Sony, Hirai
stood firm on his stand and said that he was proud of his employees for
standing against this hacker incident.
4.3 Planning and Management
4.3.1 The Importance of Planning and Management
With the increase in innovation and competitors all over the world in the
recent years, this has led to an erosion of Sony’s hold on the television and
electronics industry. This coupled with the change in leadership over the
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
years has resulted in Sony losing its competitiveness and creating massive
losses. (Adelstein and Stucky, 2012)
As such, planning and management is extremely crucial in the future of Sony
as it creates direction and ensures that Sony is well prepared to deal with the
current crisis as well as future events. (DeWitt and Meyer, 2004)
4.3.2 Sony’s Current Planning and Management
According to Chatterji et al, (2012) Kazuo Hirai who is the current CEO of
Sony has attempted to take ownership of the situation and implement
changes in Sony that he believes will bring Sony the old glory it once had.
Kazuo Hirai’s main goals are to minimize losses and increase profitability in
the long run. To achieve those goals, he has attempted to restructure how the
company functions as a whole by reorganizing the top management
employees.
4.3.3 Effectiveness of Current Leadership
Kazuo Hirai first began his career selling music for Sony’s record label, and it
is known widely that he is not extremely knowledgeable about the technical
aspect of products. However Alabaster, (2012) argued that does not imply
that he would be unable to lead Sony to a better position in the industry. As
mentioned earlier, the previous CEOs of Sony found it challenging to make
tough decisions as they were afraid of the backlash that the changes could
potentially bring.
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
With respect to Kazuo Hirai’s leadership of Sony since 2012, things have
been looking up. He has been able to make radical changes like shifting away
from the traditional consumer electronics businesses. His ability to plan and
manage Sony as a whole has been a commendable effort. However, in order
to stay in line with Sony’s vision and mission which focuses on innovation and
quality products, which is also one of the few ways to be the industry leaders,
Kazuo has to shift his focus from cost cutting to increased innovation. In
Inagaki, (2015) opinion, it is only with increased innovation that Sony might
possibly achieve success once again.
4.4 Strategy and Decision Making Process
4.4.1 Hirai’s Strategy and Decision Making Process
36 years ago, when the concept of portable music devices was absolutely
foreign to the world, Sony introduced the iconic Walkman. A company once
known for its innovation has now been reduced to a company that is barely
surviving and producing run of the mill products. (Hartung, 2012)
Hitt, et al, (2014) emphasized that each company’s strategy and decision
making process should be moulded by the mission and the vision of the
company. In the case of Sony, this would be the aim to "become the company
most known for changing the worldwide poor-quality image of Japanese
products", and “to become a leading global provider of networked consumer
electronics, entertainment and services”. (Sony, 2015)
Apparently it is observed by Hussain, (2012) that Sony’s strategy under the
leadership of Kazuo Hirai is to sell off assets and restructure loss-making
units such as its TV business as it tries to get back to profitability.
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
4.4.2 Evaluation on Its Effectiveness
Strategy and decision making is an ongoing process that involves the
assessment of Sony’s observed outcomes and implementing changes that
aim to rectify and improve its current situation. In the case of Sony, where
their short term goal is to reduce net loss, they have been very successful
thus far. Ando, R. (2015) commented, in February 2015, Sony forecasted an
operating profit instead of a loss for the financial year ending March 31. But it
still expects to book a net loss in 2014/15, albeit a smaller amount than
previously estimated.
To do so, Sony has made the decision to sell off its personal computer
division and spin off the TV business. It has also axed thousands of jobs. It
was reported by Reuters, (2015) that Kazuo’s strategy to cut costs and focus
on the sales of camera sensors and video games won him the support of 88%
of Sony’s shareholders, despite the low returns on equity.
However, as much as Sony may be doing well currently in the sales of
camera sensors and video games, success will be limited. Factors like
increased competition as well as volatility in the industry may potentially
worsen Sony’s losses. Diversification and innovation are two strategies that
Kazuo could implement, both of which are in line with Sony’s mission and
vision statements. (McDonald, 2013)
5.0 Effectiveness of Current Leadership Towards Sony’s Future
5.1 Comparison Of Financial Ratios
To determine the effectiveness of current leadership, Hitt et al, (2014) suggests
using four types of financial ratios to compute the financial statistics and evaluate the
organization’s performance. To test the effectiveness of Sony’s current leadership, a
comparison has been done based on financial data from past CEO Norio Ohga and
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
current CEO Kazuo Hirai. Through this assessment we will be able to justify whether
the current leadership is effective towards the future of the organization.
Ratio Formula Year
March 31, 1994 (JPY ¥in Millions)
March 31, 2014 (JPY ¥ in millions)
Profit Return on
Investment
Net profit before
taxes/Total Assets
102,162 / 4,269,885=
0.024
25,741 /
15,333,720= 0.002
Liquidity
Current Ratio
Current
Assets/Current
Liabilities
2,023,728 /
1,407,639= 1.44
4,204,886 /
4,783,614= 0.88
Leverage
Debt to Asset
Total Liabilities/Total
Assets
1,436,561
/4,269,885= 0.34
12,546,464
/15,333,720 =0.82
Activity
Inventory
Turnover
Sales/ Inventory
3,733,721/
671,992=5.56
6,682,274 / 733,943
=9.11
Above table shows the financial ratios under the two different leadership: Norio Ohga
(1994) versus Kazuo Hirai (2014)
It is evident from the table that the current leadership style which Kazuo Hirai used to
manage Sony is inefficient. Based on the above ratios, we can see the difference in
every aspect.
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
5.2 The Cause of Inefficient Leadership
The fact that Kazuo Hirai sold away Sony’s profitable businesses such as VAIO
computers, “Spiderman” copyrights and attempts to reduce its production of TVs
impacted most of the employees. According to Hartung, (2012) these decisions
stirred up employees emotions causing them to fear losing their jobs and resulted in
them losing interest towards their work. To them, they felt the change in company
culture very much overwhelming, causing them to feel conflicted in their beliefs,
especially those senior employees whom had worked in Sony since its early years.
Many of them whom had pioneered with Sony could not adapt to the drastic change
of leadership because they felt that the leader of Sony had lost sight of its original
vision and mission, and the direction which it’s supposed to be heading.
6.0 Recommendations
6.1 The Solution - Transformation
Sony needs a complete transformation in their leadership practice if they wish to
survive in the industry. Although it has been identified that current CEO Kazuo Hirai
uses a hybrid of leadership styles however it is seems not effective. Kimura, (2012)
mentioned, several of Sony’s previous employees commented the recent slump of
Sony was caused by the spreading of an introvert attitude and a decline in market
orientation due to organizational politics. In order to revive Sony and resume its
former glory, Hirai needs to be a transformational leader. Lowe et al. (1996)
mentioned that a successful transformational leader is capable of articulating a vision
of the future that can be shared with peers and subordinates, intellectually stimulates
subordinates and pays high attention to individual differences among people. Most
importantly, they do not merely react to environmental circumstances; instead they
will attempt to shape and turn them into favourable outcomes.
6.2 A New Beginning
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
For the case of Sony, the CEO first needs to introduce change by creating a new
“DNA” through establishing new organizational structure, goals and objectives.
According to Khan and Adnan, (2014) studies show the leadership style of the leader
in the organization has a strong impact on the performance of the organization thus
every strategic plan for Sony should be directed towards long-terms aspects and
aligns with a new organization vision and mission. While Ejere and Abasilim (2013)
defines transformational leadership as the process of influencing major changes in
attitudes and assumptions of organisational members and building commitment for
the organisation's mission and objectives, it is also essential for a transformational
leader to raise follower’s consciousness levels about the importance and value of
designated outcomes and ways to achieve them. The transformational leader should
constantly motivate followers to transcend their own immediate self-interest for the
sake of the mission and vision of the organisation.
6.3 The 5 I’s of Transformational Aspect
As part of the “change” process, Ejere and Abasilim, (2013) suggested that the
transformational leader should include these five variables that forms the essential
aspects of the leadership. They are namely the idealised attribute, idealised
influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualised
consideration.
To further illustrate Ejere and Abasilim, (2013) explained; idealised attribute are
noticeable when followers report that their leader is charismatic. Idealised influence
allows a leader to instil pride, faith, and respect in followers causing them to connect
and imitate their leaders. Inspirational motivation represents behaviour that provides
symbols and simplified emotional appeals and these help to raise expectations and
optimism amongst followers. Intellectual stimulation triggers followers on new ways
of problem solving through proactive thinking. Individualised consideration is present
when a leader delegates assignments, stimulates and coaches followers on an
individual basis.
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Like what Lowe et al, (1996) quoted, transformational leadership augments
transactional management to achieve higher levels of subordinate performance with
the primary difference residing in the process by which the leader motivates
subordinates and in the types of goals set. Therefore it is believed that the above
mentioned will help Sony in its full revival.
7.0 Conclusion
Based on the various research, it is evident that Sony has not been doing well since
the change of CEO in 1995, when Nobuyuki Idei took over and the situation worsen
after Howard Stringer took over in 2005. Although Hirai has proven to lead Sony with
a much efficient way as compared to the 2 ex-CEOs, however whether will his hybrid
style of leadership succeed? No one knows. But the fact that he was bold enough to
implement a completely new “One Sony” concept in a Japanese firm that is deeply
rooted to its strong culture values shows that he really advocates what he said when
he replied in the interview with The Wall Street Journal, (2015) saying Sony must
evolve. Although there are reports commenting, ever since Hirai took over the
leadership role, there was an improvement in the profits. But many also criticised him
for selling away Sony’s valuable assets to create those profits which are only short-
term measures, for they believed that if Sony doesn’t ride on its core competency of
utilising their innovations and technological strength to strengthen their competitive
edge over competitors, it would be useless to execute any strategy.
Therefore in the case of Sony, it is suggested for Hirai to be decisive and decide on
a full transformational leadership style rather than adopting a mixture of leadership
styles. Sony’s brand equity still holds weight in many consumers’ heart but the
negative impact caused by inappropriate leadership over the past 10 years still
lingers around. Through a transformational leadership whereby a new organization
goal, new vision and new mission is set and carried out by a charismatic leader
nominee Hirai, chances are high that he will be able to wield positive influences not
only to his staff but also to consumers that grew along with Sony. If Hirai succeeds in
doing that, Sony will truly experience a breakthrough. …………………………………
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Reference List and Bibliography
Adelstein, J. and Stucky, N.K. (2012) The Ghost of SONY. Available at:
http://www.japansubculture.com/the-ghosts-of-sony/ (Accessed on 12 June 2015)
Alabaster, J. (2012) Computer World: Sony’s Hirai, exec who led playstation
turnaround, promoted to CEO. Available at:
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2500769/it-leadership/sony-s-hirai--exec-who-
led-playstation-turnaround--promoted-to-ceo.html (Accessed on 4 Jule 2015)
Ando, R. (2015) Reuters: Sony sees 25-fold profit jump by 2018; could exit TVs,
phones. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/18/us-sony-strategy-
idUSKBN0LM05X20150218 (Accessed on 4 July 2015)
Bakacsi, G. (1999) ‘Culture Specific And Cross-Culturally Generalizable Implicit
Leadership Theories: Are Attributes of Charismatic/Transformational Leadership
Universally Endorsed?’, The Leadership Quarterly, 10 (2), pp. 220-256. Available at:
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gyula_Bakacsi2/publication/249960601_CULTU
RE_SPECIFIC_AND_CROSS-
_CULTURALLY_GENERALIZABLE_IMPLICIT_LEADERSHIP_THEORIES_ARE_A
TTRIBUTES_OF_CHARISMATICTRANSFORMATIONAL_LEADERSHIP_UNIVERS
ALLY_ENDORSED_1/links/0c96051e6d7642cd94000000.pdf (Accessed on 20 June
2015)
Biner, A.J. (2015) How To Improve Innovations Practice Through The Rise Of Job
Satisfaction. Bachelor Thesis. Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences.
Available at:
http://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/96448/Metropolia_Thesis_AJoshBiner.
pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed on 20 June 2015)
Bloomberg (2015) Sony-Corp Sponsored Adr (SNE: New York). Available at:
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=2535638&t
icker=SNE (Accessed on 1 July 2015)
Chatterji, D, Schildwachter, H, and Harrison, J.S. (2012) ‘Sony Corporation:
Reinventing Itself To Rediscover The Technological Edge’, University of Richmond-
Robins School of Business, November. Available at:
http://robins.richmond.edu/documents/cases/Sony.pdf (Accessed on 5 July 2015)
DeWitt, B. and Meyer, R. (2004) Strategy: Process, Content, Context”,3rd Edition.
London:Thomson International Business Press.
Ejere, E.I. and Abasilim, U.D. (2013) ‘Impact of Transactional and Transformational
Leadership Styles on Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria’,
The Journal of Commerce, 5 (1), pp. 30-41. Available at:
http://joc.hcc.edu.pk/articlepdf/5_5_1_30_41.pdf (Accessed on 20 June 2015)
Forbes. (2015) The World’s Most Valuable Brands #79 Sony. Available at:
http://www.forbes.com/companies/sony/ (Accessed on 18 June 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Graaf, M.D. (2015) ‘Sony chief executive praises his staff for standing up to
extortionist 'criminals' as he condemns 'vicious and malicious cyber-attack’, Daily
Mail, 6 Jan. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2898295/Sony-
chief-executive-breaks-silence-vicious-malicious-cyber-attack.html (Accesed on 6
July 2015)
Hartung, A. (2012) Sayonara Sony: How Industrial, MBA-Style Leadership Killed a
Once Great Company. Available at:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2012/04/20/sayonara-sony-how-industrial-
mba-style-leadership-killed-once-great-company/ (Accessed on 13 June 2015)
Hitt, M., Black, S. and Porter, L.W. (2014) Management 3rd Edition. England:
Pearson
Hoovers Inc. (2015) Audio & Video Equipment Manufacturing Overview. Availlable
at: http://www.hoovers.com/industry-facts.audio-video-equipment-
manufacturing.1812.html (Accessed on 18 June 2015)
Hoovers Inc. (2015) SONY CORPORATION Corporate Information. Available at:
http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/company-
profile.SONY_CORPORATION.1ea4f109cc465528.html (Accessed on 18 June
2015)
Hussain, S. (2012) Gadge Hit: Analysts: Sony In Trouble Due To Hirai’s Acquisition.
Available at: http://www.gadgehit.com/2012/10/04/analysts-sony-in-trouble-due-to-
hirais-acquisitions/ (Accessed on 5 July 2015)
IBISWorld. (2015). Global Consumer Electronics Manufacturing: Market Research
Report. Available at: http://www.ibisworld.com/industry/global/global-consumer-
electronics-manufacturing.html. (Accessed on 12 June 15).
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Inagaki, K. (2015) Former Sony CFO attacks Kazuo Hirai over strategy. Available at:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/123628c6-ece1-11e4-b82f-
00144feab7de.html#axzz3ejgVS5qC (Accessed on 2 July 2015)
Karsten, L., Keulen, S., Kroeze, R., and Peters, R. (2009) ‘Leadership Style and
Entrepreneurial Change: The Centurion Operations at Philips Electronics’, Journal of
Organizational Change Management, 29 (1), pp. 73-91. Available at:
http://www.pogc.ir/Portals/0/maghalat/890724-7.pdf (Accessed on 20 June 2015)
Kelly, T and Murai, R. (2012) Reuters: Special Report: The Sony Schism. Available
at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/27/us-sony-idUSBRE82O0HV20120327
(Accessed on 5 July 2015)
Khan, A.Z. and Adnan, N. (2014) ‘Impact of Leadership Styles on Organizational
Performance’, International Journal of Management Sciences, 2 (11), pp. 501-515.
Available at: http://www.rassweb.com/wp-content/uploads/PDF/IJMS/Vol-2/Issue-
11/Paper%202.pdf (Accessed on 20 June 2015)
Kimura, T. (2012) ‘Transformational Leadership and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating
Effects of Perceptions of Politics and Market Orientation in The Japanese Context’,
International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 7 (1), pp. 30-
42. Available at:
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Takuma_Kimura/publication/266410382_Transfo
rmational_leadership_and_job_satisfaction_The_mediating_effects_of_perceptions_
of_politics_and_market_orientation_in_the_Japanese_context/links/54f2caac0cf24e
b8794945f7.pdf (Accessed on 20 June 2015)
Kivipold, K, and Vadi, M. (2010) ‘a Measurement Tool For The Evaluation of
Organizational Leadership’, Baltic Journal of Management, 5 (1), pp. 118-136.
Available at:
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kurmet_Kivipld/publication/243973560_A_measu
rement_tool_for_the_evaluation_of_organizational_leadership_capability/links/0deec
520339867594d000000.pdf (Accessed on 20 June 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Kumar, S. (2015) Voice from senior. Available at:
http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/Careers/jphq/seniors/seniors_01.html (Accessed on 23
June 2015)
Lee, D., Him, L.L., Pu, J.X. and Jin, P.Y. (2014) ‘Sony: Application of Management
Concept Theory’, Wordpress, 7 May. Available at:
https://sony1020.wordpress.com/about/ (Accessed on 29 June 2015)
Lowe, K.B, Kroeck, K.G, and Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996) ‘Effectiveness Correlates
of Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of The
MLQ Literature’, The Leadership Quarterly, 7 (3), pp.385-415. Available at:
http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/K_Lowe_Effectiveness_1996.pdf (Accessed on 24
June 2015)
Maznevski, M.L, and Chudoba, K.M. (2000) ‘Bridging Space Over Time: Global
Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness’,Organization Science, 11 (5), pp. 473-
492. Available at:
http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=mis_facpub
s (Accessed on 23 June 2015)
McDonald, D. (2013) Can SONY Be Saved? Bad Decisions Stifle Onetime Innovator:
Ganjin Howard Stringer Fails Spectacularly. Available at:
http://observer.com/2013/06/can-sony-be-saved-bad-decisions-stifle-one-time-
innovator/ (Accessed on 12 June 2015)
Patel, N. (2015) The Verge: Sony Is No Longer An Electronics Company. Available
at: http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/18/8063269/sony-electronics-future-selling-off-
pc-smartphone-tv (Accessed on 24 June 2015)
Reuters, T. (2015) NDTV Gadgets: Sony CEO Kazuo Hirai Reportedly Faces Attack
From Activist 'Old Boys'. Available at: http://gadgets.ndtv.com/mobiles/news/sony-
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
ceo-kazuo-hirai-reportedly-faces-attack-from-activist-old-boys-685170 (Accessed on
18 June 2015)
Reuters, T. (2015) The Times of India: Shareholder re-elect Sony CEO Kazuo Hirai.
Available at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Shareholders-re-
elect-Sony-CEO-Kazuo-Hirai/articleshow/47825593.cms (Accessed on 4 July 2015)
Sanchez-Runde, C.R, Nardon, L, and Steers, R.M. (2011) ‘Looking Beyond Western
Leadership Models: Implications For Global Managers’, Organizational Dynamics,
40, pp. 207-213. Available at:
https://www.academia.edu/5255121/Looking_beyond_Western_leadership_models_I
mplications_for_global_managers (Accessed on 25 June 2015)
Smith, G.P. (2011) Profiles in Diversity Journals: How to Attract, Retain and Motivate
Today’s Workforce. Available at: http://www.diversityjournal.com/5026-how-to-
attract-retain-and-motivate-todays-workforce/ (Accessed on 18 June 2015)
Sony Corporation (2012). Sony Establishes New Management Structure
- To Drive Revitalization and Growth of Electronics Businesses and Deliver
Compelling User Experiences as “One Sony”. Available from:
http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201203/12-043E/ (Accessed on 6 July
2015)
Sony Corporation (2014). CSR Reporting: Human Resources. Available from:
http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/csr_report/employees/ (Accessed on 28 June 2015)
Sony Corporation (2015). About Sony. Available from: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/
(Accessed on 18 June 2015)
Sue, J. (2003) Asian Week: Profile: Kazuo Hirai. Available at:
http://www.asianweek.com/2003/12/19/profile-kazuo-hirai/ (Accessed on 4 July
2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
The Wall Street Journal. (2015) Japan Realtime: Q&A: Sony CEO Kazuo Hirai Says
Company Must Evolve. Available at:
http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2015/04/29/qa-sony-ceo-kazuo-hirai-says-
company-must-evolve/ (Accessed on 4 July 2015)
Wakabayashi, D. (2012) The Wall Street Journal: New Sony Chief Executive
Reveals Fast-Forward Plans. Available at:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204740904577196214261871258
(Accessed on 18 June 2015)
Warmen, M. (2014) The Telegraph: Kazuo Hirai: Sony is looking beyond the
smartphone for the future. Available at:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/110
79256/Kazuo-Hirai-Sony-is-looking-beyond-the-smartphone-for-the-future.html
(Accessed on 18 June 2015)
Yu, H.H. (2013) ‘Decoding Leadership: How Steve Jobs Transformed Apple to
Spearhead A Technological Informal Economy’, Journal of Business and
Management, 19 (1), pp. 33-44. Available at:
https://192.77.116.204/business/_files/journals-and-essays/jbm-editions/13-0399-
JBM-Journal-Special-Issue-Vol%2019_FINAL.pdf#page=35 (Accessed on 20 June
2015)
8.0 APPENDIX
APPENDIX A: MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Statista. (2015) Global market share held by LCD TV manufacturers from 2008 to 2014. Available at: http://www.statista.com/statistics/267095/global-market-share-of-lcd-tv-manufacturers/ (Accessed on 18 June 2015)
APPENDIX B: COMPETITOR’S FINANCIALS
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Hoovers Inc (2015). LG Electronics Inc. Revenue and Financial Data. Available from: http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/revenue-financial.LG_Electronics_Inc.70e242f293f08235.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
Source: Hoovers Inc (2015). Panasonic Corporation Revenue and Financial Data. Available from: http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/revenue-financial.PANASONIC_CORPORATION.d06ee749b8495923.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Hoovers Inc (2015). Koninklijke Philips N.V. Revenue and Financial Data. Available from: http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/revenue-financial.Koninklijke_Philips_NV.e365f2b0ec2860c6.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Hoovers Inc (2015). Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Revenue and Financial Data. Available from: http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/revenue-financial.Samsung_Electronics_Co_Ltd.a166cb2c88a2e408.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
Source: Hoovers Inc (2015). Sharp Corporation Revenue and Financial Data. Available from: http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/revenue-financial.SHARP_CORPORATION.08be94e9230b9527.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Hoovers Inc (2015). Toshiba Corporation Revenue and Financial Data. Available from: http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/revenue-financial.TOSHIBA_CORPORATION.ebe2542309947e1d.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
APPENDIX C: BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND KEY EMPLOYEES
Board Of Directors (As of 19 June 2014)
Chairman Of The Board:
Chairman of the Board Osamu Nagayama
Members of the Board:
Kazuo Hirai Representative Corporate Executive Officer,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Kenichiro Yoshida Representative Corporate Executive Officer, EVP and CFO
Kanemitsu Anraku Director, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
Osamu Nagayama Representative Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
Takaaki Nimura Certified Public Accountant
Eikoh Harada Chairman, Director,
Macdonald's Holdings Company (Japan), Ltd
Macdonald’s Company (Japan), Ltd
Joichi Ito Director, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab
Tim Schaaff Retired President, Sony Network Entertainment International LLC
Independent Start-up Advisor
Kazuo Matsunaga Retired Vice-Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry
Koichi Miyatai President, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc
John V Roos Former United States Ambassador to Japan
Eriko Sakurai Chairman and CEO, Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Sony Corporation (2014) Sony Corporation Executive Appointments. Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201406/14-061E/index.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
Corporate Executive Officers (As of 23 June 2015) Representative Corporate Executive Officers:
Kazuo Hirai President and Chief Executive Officer
Kenichiro Yoshida Executive Deputy President and Chief Financial Office
Corporate Executive Officers:
Tomoyuki Suzuki Executive Deputy President
Officer in charge of Device Solutions Business and RDS Platform
President of Device Solutions Business Group
Shiro Kambe Executive Vice President
Officer in charge of Legal, Compliance, Corporate Communications
CSR and External Relations
Masashi Imamura Executive Vice President
Officer in charge of Manufacturing, Logistics, Procurement,
Quality and Environmental Platform and Engineering Platform
Shigeki Ishizuka Executive Vice President
Officer in charge of Imaging Products & Solutions Business
President of Professional Solutions Group
President of Digital Imaging Business Group
Shoji Nemoto Executive Vice President, Sony Group China Representative
In charge of Disc Manufacturing Business
Keiichiro Shimada Senior Vice President
In charge of Mid-to-Long term Technology, RDS Platform
In charge of Technology Policy and Relations
Yoshito Ezure Senior General Manager of Energy Division,
Device Solutions Business Group
Representative Director and President,
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Sony Energy Devices Corporation
Toru Katsumoto President of Medical Business Unit
Representative Director and President,
Sony Olympus Medical Solutions Inc
Fumiaki Sakai Chief Information Officer
Hideyuki Furumi President of UX, Marketing Group, UX Platform
Masayuki Hattori President of System R&D Group, RDS Platform
Teruo Hirayama President of Device & Material R&D Group, RDS Platform
Toshimoto Mitomo In charge of Intellectual Property
Toshihiko Ohnishi Deputy President of Imaging Products and Solutions Sector
Deputy President of Professional Solutions Group
Terushi Shimizu Deputy President of Device Solutions Business Group
Natsuko Takei Senior General Manager of Legal & Compliance Department
Hiroichi Kawahira President of Advanced Materials Laboratories,
Device & Material R&D Group, RDS Platform
Kazushi Ambe In charge of Human Resources and General Affairs
Hiroyuki Sato Deputy President of Digital Imaging Business Group,
Imaging Products and Solutions Sector
Kazuhiko Takeda In charge of Accounting
Senior General Manager of Corporate Planning & Control Department
Source: Sony Corporation (2015) Sony Corporation Executive Appointments. Available from: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201505/15-049E/index.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Group Executives (as of 23 June 2015)
Michael Lynton CEO, Sony Entertainment Inc.
Chairman & CEO, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.
CEO, Sony Corporation of America
Katsumi Ihara Executive President and Representative Director,
Sony Financial Holdings Inc.
Chairman, Director, Sony Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
Nobuki Kurita Chairman and President, Sony (China) Co., Ltd
Doug Morris CEO, Sony Music Entertainment
Andrew House In charge of Game & Network Services Business
President and Global CEO, Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.
Martin Bandier Chairman & CEO, Sony / ATV Music Publishing LLC
Hiroshi Kawano President, Corporate Executive, Representative Director,
Sony Marketing of Japan Inc.
Masaru Tamagawa President, Sony Europe Ltd
Nicole Seligman President, Sony Corporation of America
President, Sony Entertainment Inc.
Senior Legal Counsel, in charge of Information Security, Sony Group
Kunimasa Suzuki Executive Vice President, Sony Entertainment Inc
Hiroki Totoki In charge of Mobile Communications Business
President & CEO, Sony Mobile Communications Inc.
Izumi Kawanishi Director, EVP, Sony Mobile Communications Inc.
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
In charge of Solutions Software Development,
Professional Solutions Group, Sony Corporation (Advisory role)
Ichiro Takagi In charge of Home Entertainment & Sound Business
In charge of Consumer AV Sales Platform
Representative Director and President, Sony Visual Products Inc.
President of Video & Sound Business Group, Sony Corporation
Yasuhiro Ueda President, Representative Director, Sony Semiconductor Corporation
Michael Fasulo President and COO, Sony Electronics Inc.
Tomoo Hagimoto President, Representative Director, Sony Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
Michinori Mizuno Representative Director and CEO, Sony Music Entertainment (Japan) Inc.
Hidehiko Teshirogi SVP, Deputy Head of Product Business Group,
Sony Mobile Communications Inc.
In charge of TS Business, Sony Corporation
Source: Sony Corporation (2015) Sony Corporation Executive Appointments. Available from: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201505/15-049E/index.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
APPENDIX D: ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Source: Sony Corporation (2015) Organization Data. Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/Data/organization.html (Accessed on 6 July 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
APPENDIX E: CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Source: Sony Corporation. (2014) Financial Report for 1994. Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/ar/8ido18000005flqz-att/1994-E.pdf (Accessed on 30 June 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Sony Corporation. (2014) Financial Report for 1994. Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/ar/8ido18000005flqz-att/1994-E.pdf (Accessed on 30 June 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Sony Corporation. (2014) Financial Report for 1994. Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/ar/8ido18000005flqz-att/1994-E.pdf (Accessed on 30 June 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Sony Corporation. (2014) Financial Report for 1994. Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/ar/8ido18000005flqz-att/1994-E.pdf (Accessed on 30 June 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Sony Corporation. (2014) Financial Report for 2014. Available at: Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/investors/97_Consolidated_Financial_Statements.pdf (Accessed on 30 June 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Sony Corporation. (2014) Financial Report for 2014. Available at: Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/investors/97_Consolidated_Financial_Statements.pdf (Accessed on 30 June 2015)
SONY – Evolution of Leadership 2015
Source: Sony Corporation. (2014) Financial Report for 2014. Available at: Available at: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/investors/97_Consolidated_Financial_Statements.pdf (Accessed on 30 June 2015)