Sonex deposit meeting_ws_20110301
-
Upload
pablo-de-castro -
Category
Documents
-
view
587 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Sonex deposit meeting_ws_20110301
The SONEX Workgroup: Providing an overview of
deposit usecase scenariosto JISCdepo projects
Pablo de Castro, Carlos III University [email protected]
Ongoing projects at JISC Deposit Call (source: JICdepo blog planet)
Deposit Projects Meeting, Birmingham, Mar 1st – DepositMO, JISCDura, RePosit
http://www.rsp.ac.uk/grow/measuring-success/
Measuring success of strategies to promote deposit
Measuring success for particular deposit strategies: much harder than getting a general pictureSpecific questions should be asked to repository managers, such as:
- was any given automated deposit strategy used for content ingest purposes?- could an approximate amount of items thus ingested be estimated as a percentage of total item input?
http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/
SONEX are…
As of Nov'09 the workgroup coordinator Pablo de Castro changed affiliation from Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) to Carlos III University Madrid, and Richard Jones (Symplectic Ltd) became a member of the group in Apr'10 replacing Jim Downing.
How it all started: Institutional Repositories Workshop (IRW’09)
http://repinf.pbworks.com/Repository-handshake
The SONEX paper: deposit-related interoperability in a nutshell
http://hdl.handle.net/10016/9257
SONEX: not a coding project
SONEX: not a coding project
SONEX usecase-based interop analysis
SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit
OA-RJ workflow PEER workflow
SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit
SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration
(from: “KE CRIS-OAR [publication metadata] interoperability project” presentation, CRIS2010 Aalborg, Denmark, June 2-5, 2010)
SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration
SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration
SONEX usecase scenario III: Funder-mandated deposit
SONEX usecase scenario III: Funder-mandated deposit
SONEX usecase scenario IV: Deposit via personal software
(Potential) SONEX usecase scenario V: are IRs a proper target for research data & datasets?
Widening deposit use-case analysis: beyond research papers
First Task is ‘Re-thinking the Use-Case Actors’ to establish Use Case Scenarios and to pose question of relevance of Institutional Repository (see DISC-UK DataShare Project):
Research Data (then learning materials) [a first cut]1. (Individual/Group) Originator/Researcher
1. Via the PI (Award Holder)2. Where there is no PI
2. Depositor (not originator) – mediated deposit1. Where agent reports to PI2. Where agent does not
3. Institutional/Departmental4. Libraries (or other long-lasting organisations)5. Repository/Archive/Database Manager6. Publisher7. etc
Some questions on research data management
Are IRs a proper target for research data deposit?
Could Sword deal with data transfer?
Available workforce for dealing with data management: is it big enough? Trained enough?
Research data file sizes: should deposit by reference be considered instead/besides binary data transfer?
At what point along the publication lifecycle should dataset deposit take place?
‘A summary of ongoing deposit-related projects’, http://bit.ly/c6OCi5
SONEX current tasks
Providing support to selected projects at JISC Deposit call
Cooperating along Sword v2 definition
Gathering information on new & ongoing deposit-related projects and initiatives, http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/2010/05/summary-of-ongoing-deposit-related_9901.html
Dissemination of initiative for potential intnl cooperation: OpenAIRE, DL.org
Widening deposit use-case analysis in cooperation with selected projects at JISC Deposit call: further use-case scenarios, more digital object types (beyond research papers)Analysis on research data management from JISCMRD environment
More info on Sonex: http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/
Pablo de Castro, Carlos III University Madrid, [email protected]
Thank you