Somerset, NJ, May 1, 1993. 53 rd AVS, San Francisco November 2006.
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Somerset, NJ, May 1, 1993. 53 rd AVS, San Francisco November 2006.
ca. 50 papers (many of which are highly-cited) on oxides or related topics.
Ted Madey and Oxide Surfaces:
Electron Stimulated O+ Emission from TiO2
Conduction BandAuger Electrons
Fermi level
Ti4+ O2-
O(2s)
Ti(3p)
VB
Knotek and Feibelman, PRL 40 (1978) 964
Knotek-Feibelman model:
ESDIAD from TiO2:R.L. Kurtz, R. Stockbauer, and T.E. Madey“Angular Distribution of Ions Desorbing from TiO2”Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 13 (1986) 518
TiO2(110)point defect
Ti(5)O(3)
O(2)
R.L. Kurtz, R. Stockbauer, and T.E. Madey, “Synchrotron Radiation Studies of H2O Adsorption on TiO2(110)”, Surf. Sci. 218 (1989) 178;
J.-M. Pan, B.L. Maschhoff, U.D., and T.E. Madey, “Interaction of water, oxygen, and hydrogen with TiO2(110) having different defect densities”, JVST B 10 (1992) 2470
(Combined >400 citations)
Adsorption of Water on TiO2(110):
U. D., J.-M. Pan, and T.E. Madey"Ultrathin Metal Films on TiO2(110): An Overview"
Surface Science, Volume 331-333 (1995) 845
EUV
Extreme UV Lithography(= 13.4 nm)
S. Bajts, N.V. Edwards, and T.E. Madey, “Properties of ultrathin films appropriate for optics capping layers exposed to high energy photon irradiation” Surf. Sci. Rep. 63 (2007) 73
Mirrors: Si/Mo multilayersMirrors: Si/Mo multilayers
EU
V
HCx
H2O
surface carbon growth surface, sub-surface oxidation
Cap layer
EUV mirror contamination mechanismsEUV mirror contamination mechanisms
13.5 nm, 92eV
12
(Collaboration: Fraunhofer Institut für Angewandte Optik und Feinmechanik, National Institute of Standards, Rutgers University, Tulane University, Intel)
4. Mitigation for MMA/TiO2 at 300K( oxygen and electron-irradiation: 100µA, 100eV)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
0.01
0.1
1
C film growth, nm / hr
P(O2) / P(MMA) ratio
P(O2)=1.5x10-6 Torr
P(MMA)~10-8 Torr
No oxygen
P(MMA)~10-8 Torr
T=300KIel=100 μA,Eel=100eV
P(O2)=3x10-7Torr
P(MMA)~5x10-10Torr
P(O2)=3x10-6Torr
P(MMA)~10-8Torr ( )C film thickness nm
Electronfluence(×1018el/cm2)
P(O2)=3x10-7Torr
P(MMA)~10-8Torr
Oxygenoff
MitigationeffectsforMMA/TiO2
O2 is effective mitigating agent for TiO2
Theodore E. Madey, Boris Yakshinskiy, M. Nejib Hedhili, Shimon Zalkind
O(3)Ti(5)
O(1) - ‘titanyl groups’’
O(3)
T.J. Beck et al., PRL 93 (3) (2004) 036104; Di Valentin et al., JACS 2005;Beck et al, Surf. Sci. Lett, 2005; Dulub et al., Surf. Sci, 2006
TiO2(011)-2x1:
?
Rutile TiO2
(Equilibrium Crystal Shape)
Ramamoorthy and VanderbiltPhys. Rev. B 49, 16721 (1994)
T.J. Beck et al., PRL 93 (3) (2004) 036104; Di Valentin et al., JACS 2005;Beck et al, Surf. Sci. Lett, 2005; Dulub et al., Surf. Sci, 2006
TiO2(011)-2x1:
‘Brookite-like’ model (XQ Gong et al, Surf Sci 2008)
Rutile TiO2
(Equilibrium Crystal Shape)
Ramamoorthy and VanderbiltPhys. Rev. B 49, 16721 (1994)
Electron Stimulated Desorption Ion Angular Distribution (ESDIAD) from TiO2(011)-(2x1)
[100] 300 eV
O+ O+[100]
[011
]
Conduction BandAuger Electrons
Fermi level
Ti4+ O2-
O(2s)
Ti(3p)
VB
Knotek and Feibelman, PRL 40 (1978) 964
Knotek-Feibelman model:
40 mine-
1.8 x 1017 e/cm2
70%
20 min e- 9.2 x 1016 e/cm2
55%
2.3 x 1016 e/cm25 min e-
35%
before
4%
STM of TiO2(011)-(2x1) after electron bombardment
Zig-zag atoms (O atoms) disappear rapidly with electron bombardment (high cross section).
Thermally induced O-vac. defects.
One-dimensional rows of O atoms instead of zig-zag arrangement.
O. Dulub, M. Batzill, S. Solovev, E. Loginova, A. Alchagirov, T. E. Madey, and U. Diebold,
Science 317 (2007) 1052 – 1056
The effect of electron bombardment on the defect structure of TiO2(011)-(2x1)
Clean TiO2(011) surface before irradiation. Density of oxygen vacancies is ~ 4%
9.2 x 1016 e/cm255% vacancies
Site-specific cross sections for electron stimulated desorption:
D = 9.2 x 1016 e/cm2N = 55% vacancies experiment
Once a defect is created, the desorption probabilities for the four neighboring atoms are adjusted
1/20 1/20 1/2000 1/2000
1/20 1/200 1/200
Modeled defect configuration:
Quenching of electronic excitation by defect state
Site-specific cross sections for electron stimulated desorption:
D = 9.2 x 1016 e/cm2N = 55% vacancies experiment
(1/20) = 1.2 x 10-16 cm21/20 1/20 1/2000 1/2000
1/20 1/200 1/200 (1/200) = 1.2 x 10-17 cm2
(1/2000) = 1.2 x 10-18 cm2
n = Pn A
P - desorption probability A - area per surface O atom (25 Å2)
Quenching of electronic excitation by defect state
O. Dulub, M. Batzill, S. Solovev, E. Loginova, A. Alchagirov, T. E. Madey, and U. Diebold,
Science 317 (2007) 1052 – 1056
Lessons I learned from working with Ted:
• Enjoy what you do.• Pay attention to details.• “Published means forever” - write well!• Prepare your talks.• Pay attention at conferences.• Read.• Read.• Read.• You can be successful in science, AND a good person.