String/Brane Cosmology COSMO 07 – University of Sussex C.P. Burgess.
Some Problems in String Cosmology
description
Transcript of Some Problems in String Cosmology
Some Problems in String Cosmology
Miao LiInstitute of Theoretical Physics
Academia Sinica
The Challenges from Observational Cosmology
1. Cosmological constant or dark energy
• Strong indication from the Hubble diagram of type Ia supernovae
•Supported by other experiments such as Boomerang, Maxima and WMA
P
2. WMAP Results on CMB
Universe is flat (total density = critical density)
Atoms 4%Dark Matter 23%
Dark Energy (cosmological constant?) 72%
Adiabatic, scale invariant, Gaussian Fluctuations
(Harrison-Zeldovich-Peebles, Inflation)
Best fit model
cosmic variance
Temperature
Temperature-polarization
1 deg
85% of sky
n=0.99
8 = 0.9
bh2 = 0.024
xh2 = 0.126
H0 = 72
= 0.17
The most interesting, yet tentative result is the running the spectral index
There have been many proposals on the nature
of the dark energy, but this is not a subject ofthe present talk.We concentrate on a couple of theoreticalproblem associated with the CMB powerspectrum
Strictly, there has been no accurate definition of stringtheory in a time-dependent background when spacetimeis not asymptotically Minkowskian, since in stringtheory the only physical observables are S-matrixelements.String cosmology studies cosmology using either lowenergy effective action or equations of motion withstringy corrections.Motivated by recent observations, string theorists aregetting serious about possible physical effects of short distance physics.
There are at least two schemes which have attracted considerable attention.
1. Short distance physics set by “boundary conditions” at a cut-off
2. Noncommutative spacetime effects
CMB. of spectrumpower thegcalculatinby correct
isintuition her thischeck whetcan We
.1010eleast at factor a
by space amplifiesinflation since physics distanceshort theobserve topossible isIt
542860
1. The boundary conditions
This has been considered by many peopleincluding U. Danielsson, Eather, B. Greene, Kinney,Shiu, Martin, Brandenberger, Goldstein, Lowe.And is a controversial issue regarding whetherthe correction to CMP power spectrum is of order .)(H/or H/ 2
0|a
, at time k/a: off-cut a toequal is
mode thisof size physical when thevacuumSitter de ain be k to modegiven a of state
quantum theconsiders one specific, more be To
k
k
))2sin(1()2
(P
be tomodified is )2
(P
spectrumpower original theThus,
2k
2k
HHH
H
2. Noncommutative spacetime
theory.string gfor testinmotion"Brownian "of kind ofrelation that thisis hope best we The
cm.10 to
cm10 from ranging scale, string theis where
,XT
relationy uncertaint spacetime therelation, universal a is there theory,stringIn
18-
33-s
2s
l
l
A scheme incorporating noncommutativity ofspacetime in the inflation scenario wasproposed by Brandenberger and Ho, weshould not write down the detailed formulas.The main idea is to modify the relationbetween the wave-length of the perturbationand the creation time of the perturbation.For the power-law inflation
nltt )/()a(
dlnkdn
,dlnk
dlnP(k)1n
defined are running its andindex spectral The length.-wave
cmacroscopi a is k n, largely sufficient aFor tivity.noncommuta spacetime todue is termsecond The .on depends k andn on depends where
))/(1()/((k)
have We
ss
c
scn
)1/(4)1/(22s
l
kkkkkl ncn
nc
cm1086.3 cm,1015.2 12,n
parameterswith modelinflation tivenoncommuta theusing data theseallfit can We
077.0)0.002Mpck(dlnkdn
,20.1)0.002Mpck(n
,031.0)0.05Mpck(dlnkdn
,93.0)0.05Mpck(n
are results WMAPThe
2924
050.0052.0
1-s12.011.0
1-s
016.0017.0
1-s02.003.0
1-s
sll
In conclusion, the noncommutative inflationmodel can rather easily explain the WMAPCMB data, especially the running of thespectral index. As a comparison, people havetried to understand these data within thestandard inflation scenario, and found that arather contrived and ugly potential of theinflaton is needed.
Since the WMAP result on the runningspectral index is of only 2-sigma, we still need to wait for the second year results to seewhether there is indeed a large deviation from the scaling invariant spectrum.
We are rather hopeful that the futurecosmology experiments will bring about a lot of excitements, and possible signature of Planck scale physics!