Solving the Mystery of C. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace ...

5
Walloomsack Review 30 Not all archeology is digging holes in the ground and screening for tiny pieces of a puzzle; some digging is done in the most unusual places. It was thought that a great “find” had been made back in 1991 when I found a painting titled “North Bennington Iron Works” that was “done in 1865 by I. Sackett” (see Figure 1) 1 Because of the North Bennington title, it had been assumed that Sackett depicted a blast furnace at Burden’s mining area off Orebed Road in western Bennington along the Vermont-New York State line and not far from North Bennington village. But when an all day field check was done on May 21, 1992, for evidence of the furnace, nothing was found to indicate any blast furnace ever operated here- no slag, no char- coal, bricks, or masonry. No large foundation walls or remains of a railroad right-of-way uphill behind the furnace site as shown in the Sackett painting. Nothing. So what was this a painting of – what were we looking at here? As a result of the 1992 field work, which rejected the Orebed Road area as the subject of the painting, and studying the painting closer, similarities between locations of various features in the painting appeared to agree with locations of the same features in the 1869 map of South Shaftsbury depict- ing the furnace complex. 2 Regardless that the painting showed the railroad and houses uphill and in the background, I assumed that it was an “artists convention” to compress the background, and therefore determined it to be a painting of the Burden Furnace at South Shaftsbury. I was so sure of that, it was published as the Burden Furnace in the original edition of 200 Years of Soot and Sweat. 3 Fast-forward to the fall of 2005. While organizing a paper on the Burden iron works to be presented to the Bennington Historical Society in January 2006, the Sackett painting came back like a bad dream. As old ground was revisited, the great 1992 “discovery” started to unravel. Specific details in the painting didn’t match the site, such as the placement of the engine house. e steam-emitting chimneys on the engine house in the Sackett painting meant that the engine house was obviously steam-driven, so why does the Beers map indicate a “Bellows House” – a give away for a water-powered device, alongside a canal that ran parallel to Paran Creek. Upon closer inspection, the number of houses in the background didn’t match those that had ever existed along that background road (Eagle Street) at South Shaftsbury. And Solving the Mystery of C. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace” Drawing in the Collection of the Bennington Museum Victor R. Rolando

Transcript of Solving the Mystery of C. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace ...

Page 1: Solving the Mystery of C. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace ...

Walloomsack Review 30 Walloomsack Review 15

Not all archeology is digging holes in the ground and screening for tiny pieces of a puzzle; some digging is done in the most unusual places.

It was thought that a great “find” had been made back in 1991 when I found a painting titled “North Bennington Iron Works” that was “done in 1865 by I. Sackett” (see Figure 1)1 Because of the North Bennington title, it had been assumed that Sackett depicted a blast furnace at Burden’s mining area off Orebed Road in western Bennington along the Vermont-New York State line and not far from North Bennington village. But when an all day field check was done on May 21, 1992, for evidence of the furnace, nothing was found to indicate any blast furnace ever operated here- no slag, no char-coal, bricks, or masonry. No large foundation walls or remains of a railroad right-of-way uphill behind the furnace site as shown in the Sackett painting. Nothing. So what was this a painting of – what were we looking at here?

As a result of the 1992 field work, which rejected the Orebed Road area as the subject of the painting, and studying the painting closer, similarities between locations of various features in the painting appeared to agree with locations of the same features in the 1869 map of South Shaftsbury depict-ing the furnace complex.2 Regardless that the painting showed the railroad and houses uphill and in the background, I assumed that it was an “artists convention” to compress the background, and therefore determined it to be a painting of the Burden Furnace at South Shaftsbury. I was so sure of that, it was published as the Burden Furnace in the original edition of 200 Years of Soot and Sweat.3

Fast-forward to the fall of 2005. While organizing a paper on the Burden iron works to be presented to the Bennington Historical Society in January 2006, the Sackett painting came back like a bad dream. As old ground was revisited, the great 1992 “discovery” started to unravel. Specific details in the painting didn’t match the site, such as the placement of the engine house. The steam-emitting chimneys on the engine house in the Sackett painting meant that the engine house was obviously steam-driven, so why does the Beers map indicate a “Bellows House” – a give away for a water-powered device, alongside a canal that ran parallel to Paran Creek. Upon closer inspection, the number of houses in the background didn’t match those that had ever existed along that background road (Eagle Street) at South Shaftsbury. And

Solving the Mystery ofC. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace”

Drawing in the Collection of the Bennington Museum

Victor R. Rolando

Bibliography

Maxwell Fry and Jane Drew. Tropical Architecture in the Dry and Humid Zones. Huntington, NY: Robert E. Kreiger Publishing Co., 1964.Ian L. McHarg. Design with Nature. Garden City, NY: The Natural History Press, 1969.Victor Olgyay. Design With Climate: Bioclimatic approach to architectural regional-ism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973.Bernard Rudofsky. Architecture Without Architects, a Short Introduction to Non-Pedi-greed Architecture. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1964, 1987.James Marston Fitch and William Bobenhausen. American Building. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 1999.Low-Energy Building Design Guidelines – Energy Efficient Design for New Federal Facilities: A guidebook of practical information on designing energy-efficient Federal Buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Energy Management Program, U.S. Depart-ment of Energy, DOE/EE-0249, 2001. Website: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/25807.pdfJoseph Lstiburek. Buider’s Guide to Cold Climates: Details for design and construction. Building Science Corporation, Westford, MA, 2006M. Joe Numbers. “Finding the Sweet Spot.” The Best of Fine Homebuilding, (Winter 2008), p. 50-55.

Endnotes

1The original plans identified the building as the “Stabling.” The Stabling was built in 1865-1866, designed by the same firm as designed the House and is reported to have used many of the same builders and supplies that worked on the House. When renovations were made in 1901-1902 the Stabling became the Carriage House. The Park McCullough House, Historic House and Museum. North Bennington, VT: Park-McCullough House Association, n.d.2Lizzie and John McCullough later added a garage to house the family’s new auto-mobile. The new garage was not designed to be energy efficient.

Page 2: Solving the Mystery of C. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace ...

Walloomsack Review 14 Walloomsack Review 31

all year round. The long working side faces south, where general purpose rooms are designed to prepare carriages for use, with a tack room to hold bridles, saddles, and horse paraphernalia. Next comes the store room for har-nesses, the grooming room with double doors facing south, and then the stable on the west end. Horse stalls need only small windows set high in the wall. Thus, with only a few small openings the stable also becomes a barrier to cold winter wind, helped in part because the horses’ own heat will keep the

stable warm, making it a buffer for the main barn.

The north side of the main car-riage space, holding carriages not in use, can be closed off in winter by twelve-foot-long sliding doors. A people door, only three feet wide, between the hall and the north bay, bearing the McCullough monogram, speaks to this north side’s regular sep-aration from the main bay.

Two chimneys in the carriage barn serve stoves in rooms designed for people: the grooms’ quarters on the north side and the tack room on the south. The tack room, a working space, is in the middle of the building. Almost entirely surrounded by the carriage and store rooms, it is buffered from the elements. It has a large window to let in natural light, and warmth from the winter sun. In addition, this room is set in a sun pocket that’s protected from the weather by south- and east-facing walls. With a coal stove, this room would have been a cozy place to mend tack and talk about horses.

The room for washing carriages is also protected by its location: in the center, beside the tack room, under the hay loft. The water used to wash the carriages drained down the sloped tin floor into the cellar. That water would not have been quite so cold here in winter, in a room buffered on all sides. Above it all is the hay loft, filled with fabulously good insulation (hay), which disappears in summer when it is not needed, and reappears each fall.

Last of all, there are those large windows, which let in the welcome win-ter sunshine and light, and can be opened across from each other in good weather to encourage summer breezes. And so we return to the cupola, the “original green” air conditioning.

These designs were common knowledge before the widespread use of central heat and air conditioning allowed us to forget. They can also be seen in the design of the Park-McCullough house itself. They are still in use in older buildings all around us.

Figure 3: Main floor plan of the interior space.

then more technical discrepancies appeared, such as when Tyler Resch and I spent a few hours trying to find just who “I. Sackett” was. There wasn’t any shortage of people named Sackett in Vermont in the 1860s, but the only “I. Sackett” was in Colchester, and what little we could learn of him didn’t fit the description of an artist.

Museum improvements in 2004-2005 made it impossible to locate and visually inspect the actual Sackett painting until late December 2005, when museum collections manager Callie Stewart provided a scanned image of the painting, except that it wasn’t a painting at all, but a large-format, 23-inch-wide by 17-inch-high framed black-and-white drawing.4 And it wasn’t titled “North Bennington Iron Works.” Inscribed on a rock in the extreme lower-left corner of the drawing (invisible in The Shires photo) was “Bennington Furnace, C. W. Sackett, del., Sept 1868” (see figure 2). It had nothing at all to do with a North Bennington Iron Works nor I. Sackett nor 1865 and surely, the draw-ing looked nothing like the ca 1822-1853 Bennington Iron Works complex

Figure 1: Bennington Furnace by C. E. Sackett in the collection of the Bennington Museum.

Figure 2: Detail of Bennington Furnace by C. E. Sackett.

Page 3: Solving the Mystery of C. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace ...

Walloomsack Review 32 Walloomsack Review 13

along the Woodford Road at today’s Furnace Grove. And now it was starting to look like it wasn’t the Burden Furnace at South Shaftsbury either, so what exactly was this drawing of?

How many places are named “Bennington” in the United States? In ad-dition to the obvious one in Vermont, there are places named Bennington in neighboring New York and New Hampshire. Are there others? With noth-ing more high tech than a Rand McNally Road Atlas, communities named Bennington were found in fifteen states other than Vermont (in Idaho, Ben-nington is five miles north of Montpelier). What is the possibility that one of them had a blast furnace at one time? Which one? The most obvious to start with was Bennington, Pennsylvania, the state that is home to so many blast furnaces, past and recent.

Googling “Bennington Furnace Pennsylvania” produced the village of Bennington Furnace on an 1873 map of the Alleghany Township in Blair County, in western Pennsylvania, about seven miles west of Altoona (see Fig-ure 3).5 A comparison of a United States Geological Survey map with the Sack-ett drawing found a match in the topography, adding further proof that the correct location had been identified.6 An email to the Blair County Historical Society with a copy of the Sackett drawing attached drew an almost immedi-ate response. They knew of a 1860s blast furnace in nearby Allegany Town-ship but had never seen the Sackett drawing. They included a photograph

Firgure 3: Detail of map of Alleghany Township, Pennsylvania, featuring the village of Bennington Furnace.

inside the wall.Eaves that stick out six inches are barely deep enough to keep rain off; a

nine to twelve inch overhang is better. The carriage barn’s eaves are eighteen inches deep. Originally copper gutters, now worn out and removed, sat in curved brackets running along the roof edge, adding four inches more depth to the overhang of the eave as well as redirecting the water.

Eaves are also for play, of course, because they make the carriage barn fun to look at. Without eaves, this building would be an awkward box with bumps. The length of the eaves, their edge moldings, and the rows of brack-ets underneath, all come together to create a roof that visually shelters what’s inside and delights the eye. The decorative corbels, or brackets, facing both ways at the ends of the dormer windows and at the barn’s corners are frosting on the cake.

The eaves here have one other job, quite visible in the accompanying picture (Figure 3). This is the south view of the west end of the barn. The eaves keep the summer sun from shining in the windows. This photo-graph was taken in early May, when the shadow line of the eaves is below the small windows in the stable. The sun will not shine in these windows again until late August. With the ex-tra four inches of gutter, the windows would be shaded earlier and later in the year. Because the sun’s path across the sky changes with the seasons, due to the earth’s tilt and rotation around the sun, in winter the sun will be low enough in the sky to shine below the eaves, and into those windows, bringing light and heat to the space inside.

The layout of the interior space is a further refinement of how the barn works with the weather. In the drawing (Figure 4), north is to the top, south to the bottom, the horse stalls to the west (left) and main door to the east (right).

The carriage barn was designed to create a logical, efficient progression of spaces from the horse stalls to the carriages to the front door, with stops along the way for harnessing and tack. The space overhead is used for hay and grain storage while additions on the sides of the building provide staff quarters and an equipment repair area.

The carriage barn was also laid out to maximize the comfort of occupants

Figure 3: This view from the south side of the stable area shows the cupola vents used for cooling, the dormer placement and the role of the eaves to passively control solar heating in summer.

Page 4: Solving the Mystery of C. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace ...

Walloomsack Review 12 Walloomsack Review 33

sun, making a sun pocket. Gardeners know that sheltered sunny nook in their garden where daffodils will bloom; this recessed entry creates a sheltered sunny place for horses and people.

Many buildings have a double entry that functions like an air lock: you enter through a door into a little vestibule, close the door behind you, then open another door to go into the main space. Cold air is kept out of a warm space and vice versa. It’s not practical to have a double entry on a barn. Imag-ine how big the air lock would need to be for a carriage! So this recessed entry is a pretty good substitute because the doors can be opened without the wind rushing in, and on a sunny day in winter, heat may even come in.

The cupola, with all its roof angles and arched vents, plus its weather vane with Trenor Park’s monogram, is a great architectural flourish at the top of the Park-McCullough carriage barn. The cupola is also an important part of the cooling system. A vent above a hay loft is essential because stored hay, especially if damp, can get hot enough to burst into flame. So the vents let that heat escape. They also help to keep the barn cool because heat rises. As that air goes out, replacement air has to come in from somewhere else. An opening - a door or window - lower down in the building, lets fresh cooler air in. If the vent at the top is smaller than the opening below, the quantity of air coming in is greater than the quantity that can easily go out. More air wants to go out, and as it does so it makes a breeze. In summer, when windows and doors to the hay loft are open, a breeze will keep the carriage house, the work-ers, and the horses cool.

Eaves do important work, too. From a practical perspective, they help to keep the rainwater that drips off of a building’s roof away from its walls. This is vital because rainwater on the walls will become trapped inside those walls, which leads to mildew, mold, and rot. Similarly, eaves keep icicles from forming directly on a building’s outer walls, which is bad because an icicle on the wall will become an icicle dripping down the wall, leading again to water

Figure 2: The front of the building faces east to take advantage of the morning sun. Note the recessed main doors and the hayloft access above.

of the Bennington Furnace in their response (Figure 4). The photograph was contemporary with the drawing but from a dif-ferent perspective. Despite the different view it showed enough to identify it as the same site as that drawn by Sackett. The email also reported that Charles Sackett was a school director in Allegany in 1864.7

Research at the Benning-ton Museum discovered that the Sackett drawing was purchased “with museum funds… probably circa 1946.”8 Speculation is that somebody saw it for sale someplace in the north-east, contacted the Bennington Museum due to the drawing’s title, and the museum purchased it since Bennington had a long history of ironworks.

The mystery of the illusive Sackett “painting” is solved, but the fact still remains that we don’t have any known photographs or on-site drawings of the iron mines along Orebed Road, Burden’s ore washing mill at North Benning-ton, or the blast furnace complex at South Shaftsbury. Recent deed research in Bennington and Shaftsbury has uncovered much valuable information as to who purchased what, when, and where. And we have the Beers 1869 maps of these Vermont sites, capturing what was probably there in 1869, but nei-ther before nor after.

The Beers map of South Shaftsbury shows the furnace building, bellows house, power canal, charcoal kilns, and various roads and other associated buildings. It also indicates a telegraph office and even a house on the north side of Eagle Street where works agent John Burden lived with his young wife Jenny and four small children (three were born in Shaftsbury; two died there). Important questions still remain. How accurate was Beers with build-ing placement and identification? What blast furnace remains lay quietly hid-den only a few inches below the surface adjacent the former dam at the old Furnace Grounds waiting for a different variety of digging?

Figure 4: Photograph of Bennington Furnace, Pennsylvania, taken in circa 1873.

Page 5: Solving the Mystery of C. E. Sackett’s “Bennington Furnace ...

Walloomsack Review 34 Walloomsack Review 11

Endnotes

1 Tyler Resch. The Shires of Bennington: A Sampler of Green Mountain Heritage. Ben-nington, VT: the Bennington Museum, 1975, p. 91.2 F.W. Beers. Atlas of Bennington County, Vermont; from actual surveys by and under the direction of F. W. Beers, assisted by George P. Sanford & others. New York, NY: F.W Beers, A.D. Ellis & G.G. Soule, 1869, p. 21.3 Victor R. Rolando. 200 Years of Soot and Sweat: The History and Archeology of Vermont’s Iron, Charcoal, and Lime Industries. Burlington, VT: Vermont Archeologi-cal Society, 1992, p. 145, figure 4-67.4 Callie Raspuzzi Stewart email to Victor R. Rolando, December 23, 2005, email attachment.5 Beach Nichols. Atlas of Blair and Huntingdon Counties Pennsylvania. Philadelphis, PA: A. Pomeroy & Co., 1873, p. 11. See also Myren B. Sharp and William H. Thomas. A Guide to the Old Blast Furnaces in Western Pennsylvania. Pittsburg, PA: The Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania, 1966, pp. 17-18. For information on the current state of the former furnace see ‘Welcome to Blair County Old Stone Furnaces,’ Western Pennsylvania Old Stone Furnaces at the following website address (August 2008): http://home.earthlink.net/~r2parks/blair.html. As of september 14, 2008 this link returned an error message. If you do a Google search for ‘Welcome to Blair County Old Stone Furnaces’ you may find the active link to this site.6 Bennington Furnace, Pennsylvania is now known as Tunnelhill, Pennsylvania. The name derives from the large number of railroad tunnels in the area. A United States Geological Survey quadrangle map is available, USGS Cresson, PA, 1977.7 Van Scoyoc email to Victor R. Rolando, 2006.8 Callie Raspuzzi Stewart email to Victor R. Rolando, January 11, 2006.

too often largely ignored.The carriage barn at the Park-McCullough mansion was built in 1864 as

part of Trenor and Laura Hall Park’s summer house to provide space for their horses, carriages, equipment (‘tack’), hay, feed, and housing for the staff. Both the house and barn were designed by the prolific architect Henry Dudley of the New York firm of Diaper and Dudley. Dudley had migrated from Eng-land in 1851 and settled in Troy, New York, where he designed several build-ings before relocating to New York City. He was an accomplished designer, and he understood weather.

Trenor W. Park, as Dudley’s client, expected the newest technology in his grand new home: gas lights, central heat, indoor toilets, hot and cold running water. Closely involved in the design and construction of his house, Park changed several aspects of the design, but none of his changes affected how the buildings would work with the climate. Both men understood how to build to the weather in North Bennington. The carriage house remained as it was originally designed until 1902, when Park’s daughter, Lizzie, and her husband, John G. McCullough, renovated it to add a new stable on the rear.1 They, too, built to the weather.2

So, what design elements of 1864 do we mostly fail to notice today?The aesthetic siting of the carriage barn had few constraints. It could be

placed wherever on the site it fit best. Architecturally, the final site serves as a backdrop to the house without diminishing or stealing the focus of the big main building nearby. The main facade looked back to the house, gardens, and pond.

The practical setting of the barn, though, was constrained by several con-siderations: the sun, the wind, the tilt of the earth on its axis, and the seasons, all simply givens that influenced the final design, and so the carriage barn was skillfully designed to work with these elements.

To take advantage of the sun’s warmth, the building was oriented to its seasonal changes. The east end, or front, would get the morning sun; the long south side, sun all day; the west side, afternoon sun; and the north side, a brief bit of sun in mid-summer. In this part of Vermont the wind blows mainly from the west, sometimes the north. Wind is good for cooling in summer but in winter “wind chill” makes us colder. To work with the North Bennington micro-climate, the carriage barn faces east. Its doors all face the mild east or the sunny south. West walls have only small windows.

The building’s main entrance - wide double doors tall enough for car-riages and horses - is set back (Figure 2). Aesthetically, the setback makes the door more visible and important. It also makes the hay door above it easily accessible for wagons, which can park underneath and unload. While not immediately obvious, the recessed space protects against wind and gathers