Solid Waste Management in SingaporeWaste Minimisation The Singapore Packaging Agreement jointly...
Transcript of Solid Waste Management in SingaporeWaste Minimisation The Singapore Packaging Agreement jointly...
Solid Waste
Management in
Singapore2nd Regional 3R Forum in Asia
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4 - 6 October 2010
Christopher LeeSenior Engineer
National Environment AgencySingapore
Outline
•• Overall Solid Waste SituationOverall Solid Waste Situation
•• Waste Management StrategiesWaste Management Strategies
OutcomeOutcome•• OutcomeOutcome
•• FutureFuture
•• ConclusionConclusion
TopicSingapore –A highly urbanized and densely populated city state
Land area : 710 sq km
Population : 5.08 million
Reduce Waste at Source
- (SPA)
Closing The Waste LoopClosing The Waste Loop
Collection
Towards Zero Landfill; Towards Zero Waste
Land Filling
Non-incinerable
waste
408 t/d - (2%)
Ash Recycled
9548 t/d -
Land Re-use
Waste-to-Energy
6,795 t/d - (41%)
Total Waste Generated -16,751 t/d
(Residential, Commercial, Trade and Industry
Premises)Energy & Scrap Metal
1,670 t/d
Recycling
9548 t/d -(57%)
Waste-to-Resource
- IBA Recycling
WTE
Waste Minimisation
The Singapore Packaging Agreement The Singapore Packaging Agreement jointly developed by Government, jointly developed by Government, Industry & NGOs; Industry & NGOs; w.e.fw.e.f. 1 Jul 07.. 1 Jul 07.
Minimise waste at sourceMinimise waste at source
� Design/Use less packaging
� Use packaging that can be recycled
Industry & NGOs; Industry & NGOs; w.e.fw.e.f. 1 Jul 07.. 1 Jul 07.
Signatories:
• Food and Beverage Industry
• NGOs
• Waste Management & Recycling Association of Singapore
• Public Waste Collectors
IKEA and NUS IKEA and NUS charges for plastic charges for plastic bagsbags--5 to 10 cents per bag5 to 10 cents per bag
--80% reduction in plastic 80% reduction in plastic bag consumptionbag consumption
Waste Minimisation
NTUC NTUC Fairprice’sFairprice’s Green Rebate Green Rebate SchemeScheme
-10-cent rebate for customers who bring their own bags with purchase of at least $10
-Given out more than $600,000 in rebates and saved more than 43 million plastic bags.
RecyclingPublic Education & Community Public Education & Community ParticipationParticipation
� School Recycling Corner Programme (100%) � Annual Recycling Week
• Residents, Companies, Schools, Grassroots organizations, Government agencies, and Non-Governmental Organisations
• Launched 3R booklet cum exhibition
• Recognition to communities• Recognition to communities
• E-waste take back
RecyclingDomestic and Trade WasteDomestic and Trade Waste
••Provide infrastructure for recycling Provide infrastructure for recycling �National Recycling Programme- all households have access to recycling receptacles (bins/bags)�4,100 public recycling bins
•63% of households participate
Recycling
Industrial and Commercial Waste Industrial and Commercial Waste Recycling:Recycling:
• Wood (207,400 tonnes, 72% recycled)• Horticultural Waste (93,500 tonnes, 39%)• Used Slag (418,600 tonnes, 99%)• C & D Waste (1,150,700 tonnes, 98%)• C & D Waste (1,150,700 tonnes, 98%)• Ferrous Metal (806,200 tonnes, 92%)
Recycling of Horticultural Waste
Recycled Productsfrom Wood Waste Food waste recycling
Recycling of C & D Waste
Incineration
CostCost--effective disposaleffective disposal in landin land--scarce situations:scarce situations:� volume of refuse can be reduced by 90%
- only 10% landfill space required
� energy can be recovered for power generation� scrap metal can be recovered for recycling
Incineration
TuasIncineration
Plant
Senoko Waste-to-Energy Plant
Tuas South Incineration
Plant
Keppel SegghersWaste-to-
Energy Plant
Year Commissioned
1986 1992 2000 2009
Capital Cost 160 Capital Cost($million)
200 560 890160
(Estimated)
Designed Capacity
(tonnes/day)1,700
2,100(Contracted)
3,000800
(Contracted)
Daily Average Waste Disposed
5,700
7,700
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Tonnes Per Day 2001
7,200
2009
Recycling helped to reduce the amount of
Year
1,200
2,600
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
reduce the amount of waste disposed
Landfilling
•Commenced operations on 1 Apr 99
•Cost : $610 million
•Area : 350 ha
•Capacity : 63 million m3
21
Landfill OperationLandfill Operation
3 4
Sport Fishing Bird Watching
Recreational Activities
Inter-tidal Walk Star Gazing
Outcome
57
SGP 2012 Target
Sustainable Singapore Blueprint Target: 65% by 2020 and 70% by 2030
Outcome
Reduction in per capita domestic waste disposed
Outcome
• Lifespan of Semakau Landfill
Estimated extension from 25 - 30 years to 35 - 40 years
• Need for new incineration plant• Need for new incineration plant
Estimated extension from 5 - 7 years to
10 - 15 years
Future
• Achieving Sustainable Singapore Blueprint targets of 70% overall recycling rate by 2030
- Looking into new measures to improve overall - Looking into new measures to improve overall
recycling - Targeting specific waste streams with low recycling rate
Future
• Reducing Waste to landfill
- Recycling of Incineration Bottom Ash
- Successful trial use in road construction- CBA study in progress
IBA from incineration plant Processing of IBACompleted Road-base with IBA
Conclusion
• Extend lifespan of Semakau Landfill for as long as possible
• Reduce the need for new waste-to-energy plantsplants
• Sustain efforts in minimising waste and increasing recycling to work:
����Towards Zero Landfill ����Towards Zero Waste
Thank you