Solid Waste Management inK Di i C il M l iKampar District Council. Malaysia

Kampar District Council Perak. Malaysia

K Di t i t C il P k M l iKampar District Council, Perak, Malaysia

Operation area

1) KAMPAR

2) MAMBANG2) MAMBANG DIAWAN

3) TRONOH MINES )

4) GOPENG

5) KOPISAN5) KOPISAN

6) LAWAN KUDA

7) KOTA BHARU7) KOTA BHARU

8) JERAM

9) KUALA DIPANG

10) MALIM NAWAR

11) SUNGAI SIPUT (S)

Total Population year 2005 ‐ year 2010

99102

101183

100000

102000

95068

97064

96000

98000

ion

92619

92000

94000

mbe

rs of P

opulat

90449

88000

90000

Num

84000

86000

Total population

Year 2005 90449

Year 2006 92619

Year 2007 95068

Year 2008 97064

Year 2009 99102

Year 2010 101183

140

Estimated Total Waste Generation /Day

103107.89

112.6117.53120

94.9599

103

80

100

(Ton

s)

60

80

mbe

rs of W

atse 

40

Nu

0

20

Estimated total waste generation /days

Year 2005 94.95

Year 2006 99

Year 2007 103

Year 2008 107.89

Year 2009 112.6

Year 2010  117.53

80

Total Waste Collection/ Day

6163.44

67.5470

80

54.1456

58.361

50

60

Tons)

40

mbe

rs of W

atse (T

20

30

Num

0

10

Total watse collection /days

Year 2005 54.14

Year 2006 56

Year 2007 58.3

Year 2008 61

Year 2009 63.44

Year 2010  67.54

5.  Total Recyclables (20055.  Total Recyclables (2005‐‐2010)2010)

No Materials 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010(Tones/year)(Tones/year)

1 Papers 5,973.41 6,247.92 6,535.58 6,837.06 7,153.05 7,484.272 Plastics 2,810.57 2,931.91 3,058.68 3,191.11 3,329.47 3,474.043 Glass 1,336.38 1,398.34 1,463.30 1,531.41 1,602.82 1,677.714 Ferrous Metals 553.68 579.00 605.52 633.32 662.44 692.965 Aluminium 141 13 147 78 154 76 162 08 169 76 177 825 Aluminium 141.13 147.78 154.76 162.08 169.76 177.82

Total10,815.17 11,304.95 11,817.84 12,354.97 12,917.54 13,506.80

MDKpr  recycling R tRate… 

Recycling Rate (%)

2006 2007 2008 2009 20105% 7% 9% 11% 13%

Total Municipal budget  andit ll ti f SWMits allocation for SWM 

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010RM8mil 8 mil 9 mil 10mil 12milRM8mil 8 mil 9 mil 10mil 12mil

RM 2.7 mil 3.4 mil 4.0 mil 4.3 mil 4.7 mil

Waste characteristic

Based on the landfill data, the recorded average total waste as disposed b d /dto be around 67.54 tones/day

No Generation Sources Waste as collected Percentage(tones/day)

g

1 Household 40.71 60.27%

2 Commercial 12.43 18.40%

3 Market 11 40 16 88%3 Market 11.40 16.88%

4 Industrial  1.2 1.78%

5 Public Parks /Garden 1.8 2.67%

Total 67.54 100.0%

3 Waste Composition3. Waste Composition 

‐ Food waste : 39.6%

‐ Paper : 31.2%Paper : 31.2%

‐ Plastic  :   8.1%

‐ Glass :   3.5%

‐ Scrap metal : 1 7%‐ Scrap metal :   1.7%

‐ Aluminums :   0.7%

‐ Others  : 15.2%

Waste Flow in MDKpr

Waste generated

Waste discarded for collection

Waste Retained at source Otherscollection

Collection trucks Waste pickers Sent to recycling centers

Reuse

Sent to landfill Truck workers Sold to Traders

Final Disposal Scavengers Cooperative MDKS NGORecycling Industries

SWM Strategy of Kampar

Year  prepare : 2005

Vision : 

ea p epa e : 005

Reduce waste disposal to landfill by 22 % recycling f y y grate  by year 2020 By:

Majlis Daerah Kinta Selatan (MDKS)

Supported by:Ministry of Housing and Local Government (MHLG)

Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

Mission : To promote waste awareness minimization by increasing public and building effective recycling systemg y g y

Action PlanAction Plan

• Overall project plan for each targets.

•Registration system •Reduce plastic bagg y Reduce plastic bag

MDKS

•Intensive PR and set up partnership for pilot area

•Activities, events for pilot schools

partnership for pilot area

•In‐house promotion of recycling•Billboard•Brochure etc.

Progress results achieved alreadyProgress, results achieved already

• Achieve 13% recycling rate 

• 13 model schools13 model schools

• 2 community initiatives 

• 20 trainers 

• Recycle network unit in district officeRecycle network unit in district office

• Information Network with recyclers 

IssuesIssues

• Issues  ‐ privatization of SWM ( federal level)

• Challenges : continuous and sustainingChallenges : continuous and sustaining program

C i ff d fi• Constraints : staff and finance 

• Future action : 

continue as LA 21 program

Compost centre at landfill site

How it tit  get Started ? Promotion of 

composting in Kampar 

Started ?

Try  Recycle in correct wayto achieve ZERO WASTE society

p g pJOCV

y用正确的方式进行再循环, 以达致“零垃圾”的社会

• 2 Cardboard Boxes

S il• Soil

• Charcoal

• Kitchen waste (Vegetable, fruits peels etc.)

• Mixing tool (shovel, turner, or lubber glove etc.)

***Optional***

Rice branRice bran

Existing Composting Program

Started in 2010

A) Technical workshopsB) Networking at Batu Putih new villagesCommunity Hall 

operated   by: Recycling activities carried out by:

COM

NGOsresident associationCharity organizations

by:Community committee

village headmandistribution of basket

MPOSCharity organizations 

MHLGSchools

flaunching by statemaninformation dissemination

ST

THM – household program(Pilot Project)

Takakura home method – 2 basket per householdp

Stakeholders involved, role and responsibilities 

1.NGOS – information  dissemination2.Schools – information, workshop, role2.Schools  information, workshop, role model 

3 A d i i tit ti l d l d l3.Academic institutions – lead role model 4.Private sectors – financial supportf pp5.District council – main committee ( every month reporting progress )month reporting progress )

Mobilize external resourcesMobilize external resources

• Community participation – workshop with resident group.g p

• Launching by the statesman.

NGO i i i h di i i• NGO participation – handicap association e.g. Kampar beautiful Gates 

• University students hands on project ( community service society)( community service  society)

• International cooperation – JOCV

Budget Allocation For CompostBudget Allocation For Compost 

• Municipal budget ( part of Local Agenda 21Municipal budget  ( part of  Local Agenda 21 program  )  RM 30 K a year 

F d l RM 45 K• Federal government  ‐ RM 45 K

Final product of compostFinal product of compost

• Promotion of backyard gardeningPromotion of backyard gardening

• Sell back to landscape department  for own bli l & dpublic places & garden use

Lesson LearnedLesson Learned

Success factor 

• Segregation at source g g• Pure organic waste ( homogenous) such as food and beverages industriessuch as food  and beverages industries is easier

• Bigger quantity and more sustainable• Bigger quantity and more sustainable• Market value for compost is also crucial

BarriersBarriers

• Lack of  knowledge, attitude ( do not segregate waste) and skills g g )

• need continuous  strengthening  of project

M k f i ll• Market for compost is small 

• Price is low

• Characteristic of compost content sensitive    ( H l l h ti f li i( Halal or haram perspective from religious point of view)

External assistanceExternal assistance 

• Demand market with reasonable price

• Budget to implement compost neededBudget to implement  compost needed

• If market is available  feasible doing )compost)

• E.g. sell it back to landscape department of g p p fown office usage for public landscaping worksworks

Recycle Network Unit

Kampar District Council

Jalan Iskandar, 31900,

Kampar, Perak. Malaysia

05-467 1020 / 467 104705 467 1020 / 467 1047

www.mdkampar.gov.my