NantennaFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Figure 1. Spectral irradiance of wavelengths in the solar spectrum. The red shaded area shows the irradiance at sea level. There is less irradiance at sea level due to absorption of light by the atmosphere.A nantenna (nanoantenna) is ananoscopicrectifying antenna, an experimental technology being developed to convert light to electric power. The concept is based on therectenna(rectifying antenna), a device used inwireless power transmission. A rectenna is a specializedradio antennawhich is used to convertradio wavesintodirect currentelectricity. Light is composed ofelectromagnetic waveslike radio waves, but of much smallerwavelength. A nantenna is a very small rectenna the size of a light wave, fabricated usingnanotechnology, which acts as an "antenna" for light, converting light into electricity. It is hoped that arrays of nantennas could be an efficient means of converting sunlight into electric power, producingsolar powermore efficiently than conventionalsolar cells. The idea was first proposed byRobert L. Baileyin 1972.[1]As of 2012, only a few nantenna devices have been built,[citation needed]demonstrating only that energy conversion is possible. It is unknown if they will ever be as cost-effective asphotovoltaic cells.A nantenna is an electromagnetic collector designed to absorb specific wavelengths that are proportional to the size of the nantenna. Currently, Idaho National Laboratories has designed a nantenna to absorb wavelengths in the range of 315 m.[2]These wavelengths correspond to photon energies of0.08 - 0.4eV. Based on antenna theory, a nantenna can absorb any wavelength of light efficiently provided that the size of the nantenna is optimized for that specific wavelength. Ideally, nantennas would be used to absorb light at wavelengths between0.4 and 1.6 mbecause these wavelengths have higher energy than far-infrared (longer wavelengths) and make up about 85% of the solar radiation spectrum[3](see Figure 1).Contents[hide] 1History of nantennas 2Theory of nantennas 3Advantages of nantennas 4Limitations and disadvantages of nantennas 5Production of a nantenna 5.1Lithography method 5.2Roll-to-roll manufacturing 5.3Atomic Layer Deposition 6Proof of principle 7Economics of nantennas 8Future research and goals 9References

History of nantennas[edit source|editbeta]Robert Bailey, along with James C. Fletcher, received a patent in 1973 for an electromagnetic wave converter.[4]The patented device was similar to modern day nantenna devices. Alvin M. Marks received a patent in 1984 for a device explicitly stating the use of sub-micron antennas for the direct conversion of light power to electrical power.[5]Markss device showed substantial improvements in efficiency over Baileys device.[6]In 1996, Guang H. Lin was the first to report resonant light absorption by a fabricated nanostructure and rectification of light with frequencies in the visible range.[6]In 2002, ITN Energy Systems, Inc. published a report on their work on optical antennas coupled with high frequencydiodes. ITN set out to build a nantenna array with single digit efficiency. Although they were unsuccessful, the issues associated with building a high efficiency nantenna were better understood.[3]Research on nantennas is ongoing.Theory of nantennas[edit source|editbeta]The theory behind nantennas is essentially the same forrectifying antennas. Incident light on the antenna causes electrons in the antenna to move back and forth at the same frequency as the incoming light. This is caused by the oscillating electric field of the incoming electromagnetic wave. The movement of electrons is an alternating current in the antenna circuit. To convert this intodirect current, theACmust be rectified, which is typically done with some kind ofdiode. The resulting DC current can then be used to power an external load. The resonant frequency of antennas (frequency which results in lowest impedance and thus highest efficiency) scales linearly with the physical dimensions of the antenna according to simple microwave antenna theory.[3]The wavelengths in the solar spectrum range from approximately 0.3-2.0 m.[3]Thus, in order for a rectifying antenna to be an efficient electromagnetic collector in the solar spectrum, it needs to be on the order of hundreds of nm in size.

Figure 3. Image showing the skin effect at high frequencies. The dark region, at the surface, indicates electron flow where the lighter region (interior) indicates little to no electron flow.Because of simplifications used in typical rectifying antenna theory, there are several complications that arise when discussing nantennas. At frequencies above infrared, almost all of the current is carried near the surface of the wire which reduces the effective cross sectional area of the wire, leading to an increase in resistance. This effect is also known as the skin effect. From a purely device perspective, the I-V characteristics would appear to no longer be ohmic, even though Ohms law, in its generalized vector form, is still valid.Another complication of scaling down is thatdiodesused in larger scale rectennas cannot operate at THz frequencies without large loss in power.[2]The large loss in power is a result of the junction capacitance (also known as parasitic capacitance) found in p-n junction diodes and Schottky diodes, which can only operate effectively at frequencies less than 5 THz.[3]The ideal wavelengths of 0.41.6m correspond to frequencies of approximately 190750THz, which is much larger than the capabilities of typical diodes. Therefore, alternative diodes need to be used for efficient power conversion. In current nantenna devices,metal-insulator-metal(MIM)tunneling diodesare used. Unlike Schottky diodes, MIM diodes are not affected byparasitic capacitancesbecause they work on the basis ofelectron tunneling. Because of this, MIM diodes have been shown to operate effectively at frequencies around150 THz.[3]Advantages of nantennas[edit source|editbeta]This sectionpossibly containsoriginal research.Pleaseimprove itbyverifyingthe claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research may be removed.(September 2011)

One of the biggest claimed advantages of nantennas is their high theoretical efficiency. When compared to the theoretical efficiency of single junction solar cells (30%), nantennas appear to have a significant advantage. However, the two efficiencies are calculated using different assumptions. The assumptions involved in the nantenna calculation are based on the application of the Carnot efficiency of solar collectors. TheCarnot efficiency, , is given by

where Tcoldis the temperature of the cooler body and Thotis the temperature of the warmer body. In order for there to be an efficient energy conversion, the temperature difference between the two bodies must be significant.R. L. Baileyclaims that nantennas are not limited by Carnot efficiency, whereasphotovoltaicsare. However, he does not provide any argument for this claim. Furthermore, when the same assumptions used to obtain the 85% theoretical efficiency for nantennas are applied to single junction solar cells, the theoretical efficiency of single junction solar cells is also greater than 85%.The most apparent advantage nantennas have over semiconductor photovoltaics is that nantenna arrays can be designed to absorb any frequency of light. The resonant frequency of a nantenna can be selected by varying its length. This is an advantage over semiconductor photovoltaics, because in order to absorb different wavelengths of light, different band gaps are needed. In order to vary the band gap, the semiconductor must be alloyed or a different semiconductor must be used altogether.[2]Limitations and disadvantages of nantennas[edit source|editbeta]This sectionpossibly containsoriginal research.Pleaseimprove itbyverifyingthe claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research may be removed.(September 2011)

As previously stated, one of the major limitations of nantennas is the frequency at which they operate. The high frequency of light in the ideal range of wavelengths makes the use of typical Schottky diodes impractical. Although MIM diodes show promising features for use in nantennas, more advances are necessary to operate efficiently at higher frequencies.Another disadvantage is that current nantennas are produced using electron beam (e-beam) lithography. This process is slow and relatively expensive because parallel processing is not possible with e-beam lithography. Typically, e-beam lithography is used only for research purposes when extremely fine resolutions are needed for minimum feature size (typically, on the order of nanometers). However, photolithographic techniques have advanced to where it is possible to have minimum feature sizes on the order of tens of nanometers, making it possible to produce nantennas by means of photolithography.Production of a nantenna[edit source|editbeta]This sectionneeds additional citations for verification.Please helpimprove this articlebyadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may bechallengedandremoved.(September 2011)

After the proof of concept was completed, laboratory-scale silicon wafers were fabricated using standard semiconductor integrated circuit fabrication techniques. E-beam lithography was used to fabricate the arrays of loop antenna metallic structures. The nantenna consists of three main parts: the ground plane, the optical resonance cavity, and the antenna. The antenna absorbs the electromagnetic wave, the ground plane acts to reflect the light back towards the antenna, and the optical resonance cavity bends and concentrates the light back towards the antenna via the ground plane.[2]Lithography method[edit source|editbeta]Idaho National Labs used the following steps to fabricate their nantenna arrays. A metallic ground plane was deposited on a bare silicon wafer, followed by a sputter deposited amorphous silicon layer. The depth of the deposited layer was about a quarter of a wavelength. A thin manganese film along with a gold frequency selective surface (to filter wanted frequency) was deposited to act as the antenna. Resist was applied and patterned via electron beam lithography. The gold film was selectively etched and the resist was removed.Roll-to-roll manufacturing[edit source|editbeta]In moving up to a greater production scale, laboratory processing steps such as the use ofelectron beam lithographyare slow and expensive. Therefore aroll-to-roll manufacturingmethod was devised using a new manufacturing technique based on a master pattern. This master pattern in effect mechanically stamps the precision pattern onto an inexpensive flexible substrate and thereby creates the metallic loop elements seen in the laboratory processing steps. The master template fabricated by Idaho National Laboratories consists of approximately 10 billion antenna elements on an 8-inch round silicon wafer. Using this semi-automated process, Idaho National Labs has produced a number of 4-inch squarecoupons. These coupons were combined to form a broad flexible sheet of nantenna arrays.Atomic Layer Deposition[edit source|editbeta]Researchers at the University of Connecticut are using a technique called selective area atomic layer deposition that is capable of producing them reliably and at industrial scales.[7]Research is ongoing to tune them to the optimal frequencies for visible and infrared light.Proof of principle[edit source|editbeta]The proof of principle for nantennas started out with a 1cm2silicon substrate with the printed nantenna array filling the area. The device was tested using infrared light with a range of 3 to 15m. The peak emissivity is found to be centered at 6.5m and reaches an emissivity of 1. An emissivity of 1 means the nantenna absorbs all of the photons of a specific wavelength (in this case, 6.5m) that are incident upon the device.[8]Comparing the experimental spectrum to the modeled spectrum, the experimental results are in agreement with theoretical expectations (Figure 5). In some areas, the nantenna had a lower emissivity than the theoretical expectations, but in other areas, namely at around 3.5m, the device absorbed more light than expected.

Figure 5. Experimental and theoretical emissivity as a function of wavelength. The experimental spectrum was determined by heating the nantenna to200 Cand comparing the spectral radiance to blackbody emission at200 C.After a proof of concept on a stiff silicon substrate, the experiment was replicated on a flexible polymer-based substrate. The target wavelength for the flexible substrate was set to 10m. Initial tests show that the nantenna design can be translated to a polymer substrate, but further experiments are needed to fully optimize the characteristics.Economics of nantennas[edit source|editbeta]Nantennas (just the nano-antenna part, not the rectifier and other components) are cheaper than photovoltaics. While materials and processing of photovoltaics are dear (currently the cost for complete photovoltaic modules is in the order of430USD/ min 2011 and declining.[9]), Steven Novack estimates the current cost of the nantenna material itself as around5 - 11 USD / m2in 2008.[10]With proper processing techniques and different material selection, he estimates that the overall cost of processing, once properly scaled up, will not cost much more. His prototype was a30 x 61 cmof plastic, which contained only0.60 USDofgoldin 2008, with the possibility of downgrading to a material such asaluminum,copper, orsilver.[11]The prototype used a silicon substrate due to familiar processing techniques, but any substrate could theoretically be used as long as the ground plane material adheres properly.Future research and goals[edit source|editbeta]In an interview on National Public Radio's Talk of the Nation, Dr. Novack claimed that nantennas could one day be used to power cars, charge cell phones, and even cool homes. Novack claimed the last of these will work by both absorbing the infrared heat available in the room and producing electricity which could be used to further cool the room. (He did not discuss whether or not this would violate thesecond law of thermodynamics.)Currently, the largest problem is not with the antenna device, but with the rectifier. As previously stated, present-day diodes are unable to efficiently rectify at frequencies which correspond to high-infrared and visible light. Therefore, a rectifier must be designed that can properly turn the absorbed light into usable energy. Researchers currently hope to create a rectifier which can convert around 50% of the antenna's absorption into energy.[10]Another focus of research will be how to properly upscale the process to mass-market production. New materials will need to be chosen and tested that will easily comply with a roll-to-roll manufacturing process.References[edit source|editbeta]1. ^Corkish, R; M.A Green, T Puzzer (2002-12)."Solar energy collection by antennas".Solar Energy73(6): 395401.doi:10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00033-1.ISSN0038-092X. Retrieved 2012-05-28.2. ^abcdNovack, Steven D., et al. Solar Nantenna Electromagnetic Collectors. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (Aug. 2008): 17. Idaho National Laboratory. 15 Feb. 2009 .3. ^abcdefBerland, B. Photovoltaic Technologies Beyond the Horizon: Optical Rectenna Solar Cell. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 13 Apr. 2009 .4. ^http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3760257.PN.&OS=PN/3760257&RS=PN/37602575. ^http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4445050.PN.&OS=PN/4445050&RS=PN/44450506. ^abLin, Guang H.; Reyimjan Abdu, John O'M. Bockris (1996-07-01)."Investigation of resonance light absorption and rectification by subnanostructures".Journal of Applied Physics80(1): 565568.doi:10.1063/1.362762.ISSN00218979.7. ^"UConn Professors Patented Technique Key to New Solar Power Technology". University of Connecticut. Retrieved 22 April 2013.8. ^Robinson, Keith. Spectroscopy: The Key to the Stars. New York: Springer, 2007. Springer Link. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. 20 Apr. 2009 .9. ^Solarbuzz PV module pricing survey, May 2011 10. ^abNanoheating, Talk of the Nation. National Public Radio. 22 Aug. 2008. Transcript. NPR. 15 Feb. 2009.11. ^Green, Hank. Nano-Antennas for Solar, Lighting, and Climate Control,Ecogeek. 7 Feb. 2008. 15 Feb. 2009. Interview with Dr. Novack.