Soil organic carbon (SOC)

download Soil organic carbon (SOC)

of 11

Transcript of Soil organic carbon (SOC)

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    1/11

    SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72:775785

    doi:10.2136/sssaj2006.0378

    Received 3 Nov. 2006.

    *Corresponding author ([email protected]).

    Soil Science Society of America

    677 S. Segoe Rd. Madison WI 53711 USA

    All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or

    transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,

    including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and

    retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

    Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained

    herein has been obtained by the publisher.

    Information on organic C stocks in agricultural soils is impor-tant because of the effects of SOC on climate change and oncrop production. The SOC stock at any time reflects the long-term balance between additions of organic C from differentsources and its losses through different pathways. Followingthe adoption of large-scale intensive cropping, this long-termbalance was modified since intensive cropping encourages oxi-dative losses of C due to continued soil disturbance, while italso leads to a large-scale addition of C to the soil through crop

    residues. This may cause either a net buildup or a net depletionof SOC stock (Cole et al., 1993; Rasmussen et al., 1980; Konget al., 2005).

    Cropping systems and management practices that ensuregreater amounts of crop residue returned to the soil areexpected to cause a net buildup of the SOC stock. Identifyingsuch systems or practices is a priority for sustaining crop pro-ductivity. To better understand the mechanisms by which Cis lost or stabilized in soil, the SOC stock is separated intoa labile or actively cycling pool, a slow pool, and a stable orpassive, recalcitrant pool with varying residence times (Partonand Rasmussen, 1994). The labile C pool is the fraction ofSOC with the most rapid turnover rates. On oxidation, thispool of SOC adds to the loading of CO2to the atmosphereto accentuate the process of global warming. At the same time,this pool is important from the point of view of crop produc-tion. It fuels the soil food web and therefore greatly influencesnutrient cycling for maintaining soil quality and its productiv-ity (Chan et al., 2001; Janzen, 1987; Majumder, 2007). Thispool is also sensitive to land management changes. The highlyrecalcitrant or passive pool is, on the other hand, altered only

    Bidisha Majumder*

    Jadavpur Univ.Kolkata, West Bengal 700 032

    India

    Biswapati MandalP. K. BandyopadhyayDirectorate of Research

    Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya

    Kalyani, West Bengal 741 235

    India

    A. GangopadhyayJadavpur Univ.

    Kolkata, West Bengal 700 032

    India

    P. K. ManiA. L. KunduDirectorate of Research

    Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya

    Kalyani, West Bengal 741 235

    India

    D. MazumdarDep. of Agril. Statistics

    Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya

    Mohanpur, West Bengal 741 252

    India

    Organic Amendments Influence Soil OrganicCarbon Pools and RiceWheat Productivity

    Soil organic C (SOC) pools under long-term management practices provide information onC sequestration pathways, soil quality maintenance, and crop productivity. Farmyard manure(FYM), paddy straw (PS), and green manure (GM) along with inorganic fertilizers were usedin a 19-yr-old rice (Oryza sativaL.)wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) cropping system in sub-tropical India to evaluate their impact on SOC stock, its different poolstotal organic C(Ctot); oxidizable organic C (Coc) and its four fractions of very labile (Cfrac1), labile (Cfrac2),less labile (Cfrac3), and nonlabile C (Cfrac4); microbial biomass C (Cmic); and mineralizableC (Cmin). Cropping with only NPK fertilization just maintained SOC content, whileNPK plus organics increased SOC by 24.3% over the control, their relative efficacy beingFYM > PS > GM. A minimum of 3.56 Mg C ha1yr1was required to be added as organicamendments to compensate for SOC loss from cropping. The passive (Cfrac3+ Cfrac4) pooland Cmin constituted about 39 and 11.5%, respectively, of Ctot. Organics contributedtoward the passive pool in the order FYM > PS > GM. Most of the pools were significantly(P= 0.005) correlated with each other. Yield and sustainable yield index were strongly relatedwith Cfrac1, Coc, Cmic, and Cmin. Results suggest Cfrac1as a useful indicator for assessingsoil health, and balanced fertilization with FYM as suitable management for sustaining cropproductivity of the ricewheat system.

    Abbreviations: BSR, basal soil respiration; Cfrac1, very labile carbon; Cfrac2, labile carbon; Cfrac3, less labile carbon;Cfrac4, nonlabile carbon; Cmic, microbial biomass carbon; Cmin, mineralizable carbon; Coc, oxidizable organic

    carbon; Ctot, total organic carbon; FYM, farmyard manure; GM, green manure; MQ, microbial quotient; PS,

    paddy straw; qCO2, respiratory quotient; SOC, soil organic carbon; SYI, sustainable yield index.

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    2/11

    776 SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    very slowly by microbial activities and hence hardly serves as agood indicator for assessing soil quality and productivity (Weilet al., 2003; Sherrod et al., 2005; Majumder, 2007).

    Most of the conventional methods used in SOC determi-nation aim to maximize oxidation of C (Walkley and Black,1934; Nelson and Sommers, 1982). This approach may notbe useful for assessing different management practices regard-ing their effect on the quality of a system for sustainable cropproduction, since in many cases it has been observed that totalSOC failed to serve as a sensitive indicator for such an assess-ment (Chan et al., 2001). The adoption of procedures that canpreferentially separate the more labile pools might be a usefulapproach for characterizing SOC and assessing the quality ofa system under different management practices. Several tech-niques based on chemical, physical, and biological principlesare used for partitioning labile pools of SOC (McLauchlan andHobbie, 2004). Some of the commonly used techniques are:oxidation under a gradient of oxidizing conditions (Walkley,1947; Blair et al., 1995; Chan et al., 2001), floatation with adense liquid (Gregorich and Janzen, 1996), sieving into differ-ent size class separates and their associated C (Six et al., 1998),mineralization under controlled temperature and moisture

    (Pastor et al., 1993), and direct measurement of the pool size ofliving soil organisms and microbial biomass (Paul et al., 1999).Some of the important labile pools of SOC currently used as indica-tors of soil quality are microbial biomass C (Cmic), mineralizable C(Cmin), oxidizable organic C (Coc) fractions, and light-fraction C.

    The ricewheat cropping system occupies about 13.5 mil-lion ha in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia and providesfood for 400 million people (Ladha et al., 2003). The cropsare grown with adequate amounts of fertilizer and differentorganics, as available. Several reports, however, have indicateda widespread declining or stagnating trend of yields in thelong-term ricewheat cropping system in Asia. A decrease inSOC has been identified as the major cause for this (Swarup

    et al., 2000; Yadav et al., 2000; Ladha et al., 2003). To offsetsuch a decrease (in SOC), different organic amendments suchas manure (farmyard manure or green manure), compost, andcrop residues (particularly rice straw) are commonly recom-mended. When applied, a part of their C is stabilized into SOCand distributed among different pools. This process is governedby an interplay of factors including climate, substrate biochem-istry, C loading, soil, associated precinct, and so on. As such,the different organic amendments are likely to differentiallyaffect the amount of C stabilized and the size and dynamics ofSOC pools and ultimately crop productivity. Accordingly, it ishypothesized that the long-term ricewheat cropping system

    with balanced fertilization in combination with or without dif-

    ferent organic amendments may influence SOC content, thesize of its active or labile pools, and hence the soil quality andsustainable productivity of the system.

    A number of studies have been done on the changes inlabile pools of SOC under different soil management prac-tices, but most of them are incomplete in the sense that theyincluded only one or two or at best three labile pools of SOC.Furthermore, they have been confined to the cooler, temperateregions of the world (Wu et al., 2003; Sherrod et al., 2005).Only a very few such studies have been done so far in tropicaland subtropical regions of the world (Rudrappa et al., 2006),

    although these studies are of special importance in the regionsince the organic C stock of soils here is inherently low. Thislow C stock poses a serious threat to soil health and thus long-term sustainable crop production in the region (Mandal, 2005;Sharma et al., 2005). In India, a series of long-term fertilityexperiments was started, using both organic and inorganicsources of nutrients, during the late 1960s and early 1970s

    when fertilizer-responsive high-yielding cultivars of crops wereintroduced. Productivity analysis, nutrient balance, and soilquality studies were made for some of these experiments (Singhet al., 2004; Chaudhury et al., 2005; Mandal, 2005; Sharmaet al., 2005), but no attempt was made to study the impact oflong-term continuous cropping using balanced fertilizer withor without different organic amendments on the SOC stockand dynamics of its various pools in relation to crop productiv-ity. In the present study, an attempt has been made toward thisend using a 19-yr-old experiment with a ricewheat croppingsystem on an Inceptisol located in the hot, humid, subtropicalregion of India with an ultimate aim of identifying a manage-ment practice for the system that would improve pools of SOCstock and, at the same time, crop productivity.

    MATERIALS AND METHODSSite DescriptionA long-term field experiment with a ricewheat cropping system

    on an Inceptisol located in the hot, humid subtropics was established at

    the University Teaching Farm, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya,

    West Bengal, India (23 N, 89 E, 9.5 m above sea level), in 1986

    along the new alluvial soil zone of the state. The experimental site

    receives an average annual rainfall of approximately 1480 mm and

    experiences mean annual minimum and maximum temperatures of

    12.5 and 36.2C, respectively. The soil is sandy loam (hyperthermic

    Aeric Haplaquept according to U.S. Soil Taxonomy), with pH 7.2,

    and contains 500, 295, and 205 g kg1of sand, silt, and clay, respec-

    tively. The initial surface soil (00.2 m) of the experimental site had

    total (estimated from an archaic sample) and oxidizable (Walkley andBlack, 1934) organic C of 14.2 and 8.8 g kg1, respectively, CaCO3

    equivalent of 1.0 g kg1, bulk density of 1.2 Mg m3, and cation

    exchange capacity of 22.0 cmolckg1. Because of high rainfall, a rice-

    based cropping system predominates in this region.

    Treatments and Crop ManagementTwo crops, rice and wheat, were grown annually with necessary

    plowing, on average, to a depth of 0.15 to 0.20 m using a power t iller.

    The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with the

    following treatments: (i) control (no NPK fertilizers or organics),

    (ii) inorganic NPK fertilizer, (iii) NPK + FYM, (iv) NPK +

    PS, (v) NPK + GM, and (vi) a fallow where no crop was grown

    since the initiation of the experiment. Each treatment was replicated

    four times. Farmyard manure, PS, and GM were used as organics. For

    green manuring, Sesbania sesban(L.) Merr. was grown in an adjacent

    field, and the aboveground biomass of the 40- to 45-d-old crop was

    collected and chopped into small sizes. This GM and well-decom-

    posed FYM were manually spread uniformly on the surface of the

    specified plots (size 8 by 8 m) at 8.0 and 7.5 Mg ha1, respectively, on

    a wet-weight basis and mixed thoroughly with the soil using a power

    tiller 2 to 5 d before puddling (i.e., breaking down of soil aggregates

    through tillage under submergence to create a soft layer at the top for

    easy transplanting of rice seedlings and an impervious layer below

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    3/11

    SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    for curbing leaching). For using PS as an organic, a good amount of it

    was collected after threshing, chopped, and kept in a pit with adequate

    moisture (1:0.8 PS/water) for 4 to 5 mo to partially decompose it, and

    thereafter it was similarly applied at 10.0 Mg ha1on a wet-weight basis

    and mixed well with the soil using a power tiller 3 wk before puddling.

    Native vegetation (shrubs, herbs, grasses, etc.) of the site was

    allowed to grow freely in the fallow plots without any inputs (fertil-

    izer, water, or plant protection chemicals). During land preparation

    for transplanting rice, the native vegetation was cut and incorporated

    into the soil through a shallow plowing (0.10-m depth) so that it was

    not blown away by the wind. As such, the fallow plots experienced

    little stresses from cultivation and maintained a good amount of labile

    SOC and microbial activities. These plots were a part of the original

    experimental design maintained throughout the experimental period

    (19 yr) for assessing the relative ability of different treatments for their

    aggradingdegrading effects on soil quality and also for accommodat-

    ing any additional treatments of relevance, if required, in the future

    into this long-term experiment.

    The remaining plots were kept flooded with water for a day, then

    puddled (0.20-m depth) with the power tiller, followed by a ladder-

    ing for leveling the land. One week thereafter, on average, 30-d-old

    rice seedlings were transplanted in July with a spacing of 0.20 by

    0.20 m. After the rice was harvested in the last week of October, landpreparation (plowing and laddering) was done and wheat was sown

    in the second week of November with a spacing of 0.2 m between

    rows, and harvested in April. The NPK fertilizers, at 1206060

    (NP2O5K2O) for rice and 1006040 (NP2O5K2O) for wheat

    as recommended by the State Agricultural Department for those crops

    on the basis of average soil fertility indices of the region, were applied

    in the form of urea, single superphosphate, and muriate of potash

    following standard schedules uniformly throughout the experiment.

    Their amounts in the NPK plus organic treatments were adjusted,

    however, making allowance for the nutrients contained in the added

    organics, which were estimated annually following standard meth-

    ods described by Page et al. (1982). Other recommended practices

    for raising the crops such as weeding, irrigation, and plant protec-tion measures were followed. All the aboveground biomass for the

    crops was harvested (leaving 57-cm short stalks on the ground) on a

    whole-plot basis manually by a sickle and removed from the field for

    mechanical threshing by a paddle thresher. Grain and straw yield for

    both crops on a whole-plot (8- by 8-m) basis were measured and then

    expressed in kilograms per hectare.

    Crop Residue and Organic-Derived CarbonInputs into Soil

    After harvesting the crops, representative samples of the leftover

    stubble (the short stalks left after harvest) and roots were collected

    from each of the four replicated plots of the different treatments for

    the last 5 yr (since 2000), processed, and analyzed for their C content.

    Sampling for the roots was done following the method described by

    Thangaraj and OToole (1986). The total biomass yield of stubble,

    roots, and rhizodeposition were computed as 190, 25, and 150 g kg1,

    respectively, for rice and 220, 30, and 126 g kg1, respectively, for

    wheat of the total aboveground biomass harvested at maturity for the

    38 ricewheat crops during the 19 yr of the experiment (Bronson et

    al., 1998). The cumulative crop residue (stubble, roots, and rhizode-

    position) C inputs into the soils were then calculated by multiplying

    the above total biomass amount of stubble, roots, and rhizodeposition

    by their respective mean C concentrations measured annually during

    the last 5 yr. The extra C input into the soil through photosynthetic

    aquatic organisms of the rice field was also estimated following Saito

    and Watanabe (1978).

    The cumulative C inputs into the soil through organics (FYM,

    GM, and PS) were similarly computed by multiplying the total dry

    weight of the organics added during the 19-yr period of the experiment

    with their respective mean C concentrations measured during the last

    5 yr. The biochemical composition of the organics was also determined

    for the last 5 yr following the methods described by Rahn et al. (1999).

    Soil Sampling and AnalysisThree representative field-moist soil samples were collected from

    each of the plots in each replication from 0- to 0.2-, 0.2- to 0.4-, and

    0.4- to 0.6-m depths with a bucket auger on the seventh day after

    rice harvest. They were pooled together to make a composite sample

    for each depth and replication, then hand crushed, passed through a

    2.0-mm sieve, stored at 4C, and used fresh within 24 h for estimating

    soil microbial biomass C and mineralizable C. A portion of the field-

    moist soil samples was oven dried, passed through the same sieve, and

    used for analysis of different pools of C. Additional triplicate samples

    were taken from all three depths using a core sampler (0.05 m in

    diameter, 0.08 m in length) for measuring the bulk density of the soil

    following the method described by Blake and Hartge (1986).

    Total Organic CarbonThe soil samples were oven dried, powdered, and passed through

    a 2.0-mm sieve, while the organics (FYM, PS, GM, stubble, and

    roots) were oven dried and finely ground in a mechanical grinder fol-

    lowing the methods described by Nelson and Sommers (1982). They

    were all analyzed for C by a LECO CHN analyzer (Foss Heraeus

    Elemental Analyzer CHN-O-RAPID, Hanau, Germany). Soil sam-

    ples were also analyzed for inorganic C titrimetrically by digesting

    them with dilute HCl following the method of Bundy and Bremner

    (1972). The Ctot(obtained by Ctot= Leco C HCl-C), expressed as

    megagrams per hectare for each of the three (00.2-, 0.20.4-, and

    0.40.6-m) depths, was computed by multiplying the Ctotcontent(g kg1) by the bulk density (Mg m3) and depth (m). The amount of

    C left over, stabilized, and sequestered in the entire 0- to 0.6-m depth

    was estimated as

    ( )NPK+or gC0.6

    1

    NPK

    0.0

    C left over in soil from

    applied organics (Mg ha ) Cd

    =

    = [1]

    ( )0.6

    0.0

    19

    NPK+org NPK

    org1

    C CC stabilized

    C

    d

    y

    =

    =

    =

    [2]

    where CNPK+orgrepresents C in NPK fertilizer plus organic amend-

    ments (FYM, GM, or PS), CNPKis the C in the NPK treatment at

    0- to 0.6-m depth, and Corgrepresents C applied through FYM, GM,

    or PS during 19 yr.

    1

    current initC sequestered (Mg ha soil) SOC SOC = [3]

    where SOCcurrentand SOCinitindicate the SOC stocks in 2004 (cur-

    rent) and at the initiation of the experiment (in 1986). Positive and

    negative values indicate SOC gains and losses, respectively, for the

    cropping system. A relationship (linear regression equation) between

    such changes in SOC (Ctot) (Y) and the total cumulative C inputs

    (crop residue + organics) to the soils (X) over the years was computed.

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    4/11

    778 SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    The critical amounts of C inputs causing a zero change in SOC in

    soils were calculated (X) from the equation having Y= 0.

    Oxidizable Organic Carbon and Its FractionsThe content of Coc and its different fractions in the soil was

    estimated through the Walkley and Black (1934) method as modi-

    fied by Chan et al. (2001) using 5, 10, and 20 mL of concentrated

    (18.0 mol L1) H2SO4and K2Cr2O7solution. This resulted in three

    acid-aqueous solution ratios of 0.5:1, 1:1, and 2:1 that corresponded

    to 6.0, 9.0, and 12.0 mol L1H2SO

    4, respectively, and caused the

    production of different amounts of heat of reaction to bring about

    oxidation of SOC of different oxidizability. The amounts of Cocthus

    determined allowed separation of Ctot into the following four frac-

    tions of decreasing oxidizability as defined by Chan et al. (2001):

    Fraction I (Cfrac1, very labile): organic C oxidizable under 6.0

    mol L1H2SO4

    Fraction II (Cfrac2, labile): the difference in Cocoxidizable under 9.0

    mol L1and that under 6.0 mol L1H2SO4

    Fraction III (Cfrac3, less labile): the difference in Cocoxidizable

    under 12.0 mol L1and that under 9.0 mol L1H2SO4

    (the 12.0 mol L1 H2SO4 is equivalent to the standard

    Walkley and Black method)

    Fraction IV (Cfrac4, nonlabile): residual organic C after oxidation

    with 12.0 mol L1H2SO4when compared with Ctot

    Mineralizable CarbonA 25-g portion of field-moist soil samples was wetted to 50%

    water-filled pore space. It was placed in 1.0-L canning jars along with

    vials containing 10 mL of 1.0 mol L1NaOH to trap the evolved

    CO2, and incubated for 24 d at 25 2C. Alkali traps were replaced

    at 3 and 10 d and finally removed at 24 d. Evolved CO2was esti-

    mated by titrating the excess alkali in the traps with 1.0 mol L1HCl

    to a phenolphthalein endpoint (Anderson, 1982). Basal soil respira-

    tion (BSR), an estimate of potential microbial activity, was calculatedas the linear rate of respiration during 10 to 24 d of incubation. The

    total amount of CO2C evolved during the 24-d incubation was

    taken as a measure of the potential Cminof the soil (Franzluebbers

    and Arshad, 1996).

    Microbial Biomass CarbonField-moist soil samples (25 g) were fumigated with CHCl3

    vapor for 24 h and then extracted with 0.5 mol L1K2SO4(Vance

    et al., 1987). A second, unfumigated set of samples was also similarly

    extracted. The difference between the C obtained from the fumigated

    and unfumigated samples was taken to represent the microbial C

    flush. The Cmic

    was calculated using the relationship Cmic

    = 1/0.41

    C flush (Voroney and Paul, 1984). A microbial quotient (MQ) was

    calculated as the ratio of Cmic to Ctot. The respiratory quotient or

    metabolic quotient (qCO2) was calculated as the ratio of Cminto Cmic

    and expressed as grams CO2evolved per day per gram of Cmic.

    Sustainable Yield Index and Yield EquivalentTotal crop productivity of the ricewheat system was calculated

    through a sustainable yield index and equivalent rice yield using yield

    data for the 38 ricewheat crops harvested during the entire 19-yr

    period of the experiment. This was done to offset annual variations in

    yield and highlight performance of the treatments during the entire

    experimental period. The sustainable yield index is defined as

    max

    SYI Y

    Y

    = [4]

    where Y is the estimated average yield of a practice across the years,

    is its estimated standard deviation, and Ymaxis the observed maxi-

    mum yield in the experiment during the years of cultivation (Singh et

    al., 1990). Average equivalent rice yield for wheat was calculated as

    ( )( )Equivalent grain yield of wheat unit price of wheatrice yield

    unit price of rice=

    where unit priceis the procurement price fixed by the government for

    a unit quantity of the respective grain during the harvesting season.

    Statistical AnalysisStatistical analysis was performed by the Windows-based SPSS

    program (Version 10.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL). The SPSS procedure was

    used for analysis of variance to determine the statistical significance

    of treatment effects. Duncans multiple-range test was used to com-

    pare treatment means. Simple correlation coefficients and regression

    equations were also developed to evaluate the relationships among the

    response variables (equivalent rice yield, sustainable yield index [SYI],

    Cmin, Cmic, Cfrac1, Coc, etc.) using the same statistical package. The

    0.05 probability level is regarded as statistically significant.

    RESULTSBiomass Yield and Quantity and Quality of

    Organic ResidueOn average, grain yield was higher for both crops with

    NPK plus organic amendments than only NPK or con-trol treatments (Fig. 1). This effect of organics was more pro-nounced with FYM for rice and with PS for wheat (separatedata not presented). Only with the control treatment wasthere a declining trend in system productivity during the 19-yrperiod of the experiment. This was true particularly for rice. Ofthe five tested treatments, the equivalent rice yield and annualC input return to soil were highest with NPK + FYM, fol-lowed by NPK + PS > NPK + GM > NPK > control

    Fig. 1. Combined (rice and wheat) grain yield of the ricewheat crop-ping system under different treatments (19862004): NPK, in-organic NPK fertilizer; GM, green manure; PS, paddy straw;FYM, farmyard manure.

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    5/11

    SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    treatments (Table 1). Sustainable yield index values were alsohigher with NPK plus organics compared with only NPKor control treatments.

    The quantities of stubble, root biomass, and rhizodepo-sition (rice and wheat together) were higher in NPK plusorganics than in NPK only or control treatments (Fig. 2).On average, C concentrations (on an oven-dry basis) in stubbleand roots were 318 21 and 412 33 g kg1, respectively, forrice and 352 26 and 391 37 g kg1, respectively, for wheat.The C concentrations for the three organics were 333 51, 420

    23, and 415 18 g kg1

    for FYM, PS, and GM, respectively(Table 2). The FYM also contained the highest amount of ash(253 36 g kg1), lignin (175 15 g kg1), and polyphenol(10.8 3.2 g kg1); PS had the highest C/N value (97.7) andcellulose content (350 29 g kg1); GM had the lowest valuesfor all these parameters.

    Total Soil Organic Carbon and Carbon StabilizationContinuous cropping without the use of NPK fertil-

    izer or organics (i.e., control) for 19 yr caused a net decrease(13.3%) in Ctot content compared with that under fallow,whereas cropping with the use of NPK fertilizers and organ-ics increased the Ctotcontent by 26.7, 24.1, and 22.0% with

    FYM, PS, and GM, respectively, over that of the control (Table3). Out of 9.49, 7.98, and 6.31 Mg of C added through FYM,PS, and GM (on a dry-weight basis), respectively, only 6.44,4.57, and 3.09 Mg, respectively, could be accounted for in thesoil in these treatments after 19 yr of cropping (Table 4). A sig-nificant positive linear relationship (R2= 0.98, P= 0.001) wasobserved between changes in SOC (Ctot) and total cumulativeC inputs (crop residue plus organics) (Fig. 3), which is describedby the following equation: SOC sequestered (Mg ha1) = 0.14 cumulative C input (Mg ha1) 9.19. Figure 3 shows thatC inputs of 3.56 Mg ha1yr1to soils can keep the SOC levelunchanged. This is taken as the critical amount of C inputs formaintenance (no depletion) of SOC level.

    Oxidizable Organic Carbon and Its FractionsCropping both with and without (control) NPK fer-

    tilizer caused a decrease (4.5 and 11.3%, respectively) in Coccompared with that in the no-cultivation fallow treatment(Table 3). The NPK fertilizer combined with FYM, PS, orGM caused an increase in Cocof as much as 12.4 and 20.9,10.4 and 18.8, and 8.2 and 16.4% over that in the NPK andcontrol treatments, respectively.

    The amounts of SOC fractions extracted under a gradi-ent (6, 9, and 12 mol L1 H2SO4) of oxidizing conditions

    Table 1. Annual return of crop residue C to soil, equivalent rice yield, and sustainable yield index (SYI) under different treatments of thericewheat system (mean of 19 yr of experimentation).

    TreatmentC returned to soil through

    Equivalent rice yield SYIStubble Roots Rhizodeposition Aquatic growth (in rice) Total

    Mg ha1

    Control 0.08 0.02 0.56 0.12 0.62 0.13 0.70 1.96 0.32 2.35 0.24 0.62

    NPK 0.16 0.03 1.29 0.22 1.56 0.18 0.70 3.70 0.42 6.67 0.35 0.87

    NPK + FYM 0.18 0.06 1.42 0.19 1.80 0.21 0.70 4.10 0.39 7.47 0.26 0.92

    NPK + PS 0.18 0.04 1.39 0.23 1.75 0.26 0.70 4.02 0.28 7.31 0.31 0.93

    NPK + GM 0.17 0.05 1.36 0.21 1.71 0.29 0.70 3.93 0.33 7.03 0.29 0.91

    Control, no NPK fertilizers or organics used; NPK, recommended rate of inorganic NPK fertilizer; FYM, farmyard manure; PS, paddy straw;GM, green manure.

    Fig. 2. Combined (rice and wheat) amount of crop residue (stubble,roots, and rhizodeposition) returned to the soil under differenttreatments in the ricewheat cropping system (19862004):NPK, inorganic NPK fertilizer; GM, green manure; PS, paddystraw; FYM, farmyard manure.

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    6/11

    780 SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    varied significantly (P = 0.001) among the treatments anddepths compared (data not given, pooled for the layers, Table3). The means of all treatments were in the order C

    frac2 >

    Cfrac4Cfrac1> Cfrac3, constituting about 32.1, 29.7, 28.9,and 9.3%, respectively, of the Ctot. The NPK + FYM andNPK + PS treatments had higher values, whereas the controltreatment had lower values for almost all the fractions. Such

    values for the fallow treatment were also higher, for most of thefractions, than that of the control. Again, there was a greateraccumulation of all the fractions in the surface compared withthe subsurface layers (data pooled for the layers).

    Mineralizable Carbon, Soil Respiration, andMicrobial Biomass Carbon

    Mineralizable C content of the soil varied from 1.15 to

    1.92, with a mean value of 1.65 g CO2C kg1

    soil, consti-tuting about 11.4% of the Ctot (Table 5). This was higher(P= 0.001) in NPK + FYM (12.4%) and fallow (12.3%)than in the other treatments, with similar trends for BSR. TheCmiccontent varied from 0.28 to 0.52, with a mean value of0.43 g C kg1soil. The Cmiccontent of the different treatments

    were in the following order: NPK + FYM (0.52 g C kg1)NPK + PS (0.48 g C kg1) fallow (0.47 g C kg1) NPK + GM (0.45 g C kg1) NPK (0.41 g C kg1) >control (0.28 g C kg1). The MQ also varied widely between0.023 and 0.033 kg Cmic kg

    1 Ctot, with a mean value of0.030 kg Cmickg

    1Ctot(Table 5). Its values were higher in allthe fertilized treatments than in the control. On the contrary,

    the qCO2was higher under the control and NPK than inthe NPK plus organic treatments, with no variation, how-ever, among the three different organic amendments used.

    Relationship among Different Organic Carbon Poolsand with Crop Productivity

    Correlation analyses (data not shown) showed that mostof the C pools were significantly correlated (P= 0.005) with

    each other. Such correlations forCfrac1 and Coc were comparativelystronger. When the relationship wasdrawn between SOC pools and cropproductivity, data fit well with the lin-ear predictive model for Cmic, Cfrac1,Coc, and Cmin(Table 6).

    DISCUSSIONSoil Organic Carbon Depletion and AppliedCarbon Stabilization

    Cropping during the years caused a net decrease (13.3%of fallow) in Ctot. Crop cultivation needs plowing, which dis-turbs the distribution and stability of soil aggregates (Six et al.,2002), thereby exposing the organic C stock in soils to rapidoxidation. This results in depletion of the stock. Many research-ers (Jenny and Raychaudhuri, 1960; Swarup et al., 2000), how-ever, have reported a much greater magnitude (3060%) of thisdepletion due to cropping in this subtropical part of India. Thecomparatively lower magnitude of depletion we observed wasfirst due to the soils remaining under a unique aquic (flooded)moisture regime for 3 to 4 mo for the rice crop and second due

    to the soils being inherently low in organic C content (34.4 Mgha1for the 00.6-m depth). These conditions possibly slowedthe rate of C oxidation in the soil. Cropping with NPK +FYM, PS, or GM brought about a significant increase in Ctotdue to an additive effect of NPK and the organics and interac-tions between them. Moreover, a large amount of plant residue(stubble, root biomass, and rhizodeposition) C was left over inthe soil owing to increased yield under these treatments (Table2, Fig. 2). A similar buildup of SOC due to cropping withthe application of balanced fertilizer combined with manure(Rudrappa et al., 2006), paddy straw (Verma and Bhagat, 1992),and green manure (Yadav et al., 2000) was also reported fromlong-term experiments.

    It was observed that 67.8, 57.3, and 49.0% of the Capplied through FYM, PS, and GM, respectively, was stabi-lized in the form of SOC (Table 4). This shows that the Capplied through FYM was the most resistant while that appliedthrough GM was the least resistant to decomposition. This isbecause FYM and PS have a higher C/N ratio and lignin andpolyphenol contents than GM (Table 2). The higher content oflignin and polyphenol in FYM and PS led to the formation of

    Table 2. Composition of the organic amendments used.

    Organic amendment Ash Total C Total N C/N Cellulose Lignin Polyphenol

    g kg1 g kg1

    Farmyard manure 253 36 333 21 5.0 1.5 66.6 231 36 175 15 10.8 3.2

    Paddy straw 98 4 420 23 4.3 1.3 97.7 350 29 110 11 6.0 2.9

    Green manure 123 8 414 18 17.0 2.2 24.3 100 15 89 13 3.2 1.9

    Table 3. Soil organic C and its fractions at 0- to 0.6-m depth under different treatments after 19 yr of ricewheat cropping.

    Treatment Total organic C Oxidizable organic C Very labile C Labile C Less labile C Nonlabile C

    Mg ha1

    Fallow 81.7 c 58.5 d 24.9 abB 27.0 bcA 6.6 bC 23.1 bB

    Control 70.8 d 51.9 f 21.7 eB 23.6 dA 6.7 bD 18.9 cC

    NPK 83.3 c 55.8 e 23.4 dB 27.7 bA 4.8 cC 27.4 aA

    NPK + FYM 89.7 a 62.8 a 25.0 aB 26.6 cA 11.2 aC 26.9 aA

    NPK + PS 87.8 b 61.7 b 24.8 bC 27.0 bcA 9.9 aD 26.2 aB

    NPK + GM 86.4 b 60.4 c 24.5 cC 28.6 aA 7.4 bD 25.9 aB

    Overall mean 83.3 58.5 24.0 B 26.7 A 7.8 C 24.7 B

    Fallow, no cultivation since inception; control, no NPK fertilizers or organics used; NPK, recommended rate of inorganic NPK fertilizer;FYM, farmyard manure; PS, paddy straw; GM, green manure.

    Within a column of a C pool, numbers followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different between treatments atP0.05 by Dun-cans multiple-range test.

    Within a row of a treatment, numbers followed by different uppercase letters are significantly different between C pools at P0.05 by Duncansmultiple-range test.

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    7/11

    SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    stable complexes with proteins of plant origin and thus madethe FYM and PS C more resistant to decomposition than thatof the GM (Tian et al., 1992). Villegas-Pangga et al. (2000)also obtained an inverse relationship between cumulative Crelease and the C/N ratio in rice straw. The differences in themagnitude of loss among the organic sources (GM 51.0%, PS42.7%, and FYM 32.2%) were narrowed (6371%), however,when crop residue C inputs were also included (Table 4). Highash, lignin, and polyphenol contents in the stubble and rootsof the rice and wheat crops gave them resistance to decomposi-tion. Results thus suggest that both the quality and quantity ofC inputs into the soil have an important role in building upSOC. The total amount of C applied to the soil through allthree organics (FYM, PS, and GM) together during the entireperiod (19 yr) of the experiment was 23.8 Mg C ha1(Table4), of which 14.1 Mg C ha1, constituting, on average, 58.1%of the added amount, could be accounted for in the form ofCtotin the soil. Furthermore, the combination of organics withNPK fertilizer caused a significant increase in crop yield (Fig.1, Table 1), with an attendant increase in the amount of cropresidue C returned to the soil (Fig. 2, Table 1). If this is alsotaken into consideration, the value of leftover C declines to

    only 33% of the applied amount (organic plus crop residue C)(Table 4). A strong oxidative force of high temperature (dur-ing peak summer months, the temperature can reach 4045C)compared with cooler, temperate regions coupled with the dis-rupting effect of intensive cultivation led to a rapid oxidationof soil organic C in this region.

    The existence of a linear relationship (R2= 0.98, P= 0.001;Fig. 3) between the changes in SOC (Ctot) and the total cumu-lative C inputs (organics plus crop residue) to the soil indicatesthat, even after 19 yr of C additions at a reasonably high ratethrough FYM, PS, and GM (7.510.0 Mg ha1yr1on a wet-

    weight basis) and crop residues (3.934.10 Mg ha1yr1), thesoils of the present experiment still have a capacity for storing

    C and therefore have great potential for further C sequestration.The slope of the curve (Fig. 3) represents the rate of conver-sion of input C to SOC. This is about 14% of each additionalmegagram of C input per hectare in this cropping system. We

    wanted to compare our values with those of others, if any, insubtropical parts of the world but failed to do so since suchinformation in the literature is rare; however, our values weresimilar to those reported by Rasmussen and Collins (1991)(14.021.0%) and Rasmussen and Smiley (1997) (14.8%)

    from cooler, temperate climatic regions (the United States andCanada) but higher than those obtained by Kong et al. (2005)

    (7.6%) under Mediterranean-like climatic conditions.This study also reveals that, to maintain SOC levels

    (zero change), the critical amount of C input to the soil is3.56 Mg C ha1yr1(Fig. 3). This is similar to that reportedby Kong et al. (2005) (3.1 Mg ha1yr1) in Davis, CA, undera Mediterranean-like climate. The quantity of crop residue Cinputs (3.7 Mg ha1yr1) under the NPK treatment almostfailed to bring about any significant change (~3.6%) in SOCeven after 19 yr of cultivation. In view of this, the observedcritical amount of 3.56 Mg C ha1yr1seems to be a realisticone; however, more such studies need be undertaken under hot,subhumid, tropical climate to substantiate the observed valueand look for suitable alternate profitable cropping systems that

    might provide the amount necessary for upkeep of soil health.

    Oxidizable Organic Carbon and Its FractionsReports of loss of Coc content in soils due to cropping

    are many from this subtropical region because of the hightemperature (Bhattacharyya et al., 2004, p. 44; Swarup et al.,2000). Carbon supplementation through FYM, PS, and GMincreased Coc; however, the percentage increase in Cocover thecontrol was relatively lower than that of Ctot. Accumulation

    Fig. 3. Relationship between cumulative C inputs to soil and change in soilorganic C (SOC) stock (critical C input value derived for zero change)under different treatments in the ricewheat cropping system (errorbars represent the standard error of means of change in SOC).

    Table 4. Cumulative amount of C inputs and leftover C in soils at 0- to 0.6-m depth after 19 yr of ricewheat cropping.

    Organicamendment

    C input throughorganic amendments

    C input throughcrop residues

    Leftover C in soil from

    organic amendments

    Leftover C as percentage applied from

    Passivepool

    TotalOrganic

    amendmentsOrganic amendments +

    crop residues

    Mg ha1 %

    Farmyard manure 9.49 7.60 4.24 6.44 67.8 37.7

    Paddy straw 7.98 6.08 2.38 4.57 57.3 32.5

    Green manure 6.31 4.37 1.38 3.09 49.0 29.0

    Mean 7.93 6.02 2.67 4.70 58.0 33.0

    Total 23.78 18.05 8.00 14.10

    Crop residue C = (crop residue C in fertilizer + organic treatment) crop residue C in fertilizer treatment.

    Leftover C in soil = (soil C in fertilizer + organic treatment) soil C in fertilizer treatment.

    Passive pool = (less labile C + nonlabile C).

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    8/11

    782 SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    of Cocunder organic inputs is likely to be influenced by theircomposition, C/N ratios, and decomposability or degradability.In spite of having significant differences in these parameters andalso in the amounts of C added through the three organic sources(FYM, PS, and GM), there were little differences in the Coccon-

    tent (62.8, 61.7, and 60.4 Mg C ha1

    soil, respectively) in the soilprofile (up to 0.6 m) even after 19 yr of their application.

    The amounts of the four fractions (Cfrac1, Cfrac2, Cfrac3,and Cfrac4) of SOC having different lability varied significantlyamong the treatments and depths (Table 3). These variations

    were more prominent with Cfrac1and Cfrac2than with Cfrac3and Cfrac4. The current methodology for estimating C frac-tions would thus be helpful in monitoring even small differ-ences in the effects of different treatments. On average, thehigher values of different C fractions under FYM, PS, and GMtreatments were ascribed to the increased yield and C returnedto the soil. These higher values of Cfrac1under the NPK +FYM and NPK + PS treatments particularly were associated

    with the high content of polysaccharides (cellulose and hemi-cellulose) in FYM and PS that could lead to the productionof higher amounts of labile fraction (Cfrac1) SOC than withGM (Seneviratne, 2000). Many researchers (Halvorson et al.,2002; Dormaar and Pittman, 1980; Rasmussen and Collins,1991) have shown that there was, in general, a decrease in thevalues of different pools of C in soils under fallow treatmentand the magnitude varied directly with the length of the fallowperiod. They had fallow periods of varying length between twocrops where land was subjected to normal plowing and otherforms of perturbation, except during the fallow period. Duringthe fallow period, the land remained bare and was exposed to

    high temperatures that accelerated the oxidation of SOC. Inour experiment, however, the fallow treatment was maintaineddifferently, allowing native vegetation to grow with its subse-quent in situ incorporation with minimum tillage and no per-turbation for cropping since the initiation of the experiment in

    1986. This explained the observed variations in results underthe fallow treatments between this study and the others men-tioned above.

    The first two most easily oxidizable fractions, Cfrac1andCfrac2, together constituted about 87.6 and 61.0% of the Cocand Ctot, respectively. Chan et al. (2001), while comparing theeffectiveness of different pasture species in maintaining labilepools of SOC, observed a similar proportion (~65%) of Ctotinthose two labile fractions in semiarid areas of Australia. Theyfurther observed that the other two fractions (Cfrac3and Cfrac4)accounted for a smaller proportion (~35%) of the Ctotthat falls

    within the range of 30 to 40% assigned to the passive poolof SOC used in the Century Model (Parton and Rasmussen,

    1994), which is very close to our observations (39% of Ctot).Further, while fractionating C into these four pools in soilsfrom five long-term experiments with different managementpractices and cropping systems, Majumder (2007) observedstrong relationships of Cfract 1and Cfract 2with Cmicand Cminand crop productivity of the systems, although such relation-ships for Cfract 3and Cfract 4were weak. Accordingly, Cfract 1and Cfract 2might constitute the active pool while Cfract 3andCfract 4might represent the passive pool of SOC (Chan et al.,2001; Majumder, 2007). Comparing our results with those ofChan et al. (2001), it appears that the type of crops cultivated(cereals or legumes and grasses) does not have much effect onthe relative proportion of C

    tot

    in labile pools. Climatic condi-

    tions (semiarid or subtropical) were also found to have no dis-cernible effect in this regard under the management practicesand cropping system tested.

    An attempt was made to find out how the application ofdifferent organic amendments helped to build up the passivepool (Cfrac3+ Cfrac4) of SOC (Table 4). It was observed thatout of 6.44, 4.57, and 3.09 Mg of C inputs in the form ofFYM, PS, and GM, respectively, 5.97, 3.86, and 1.08 Mg con-stituting 92.8, 84.5, and 35.1%, respectively, found their wayto the passive pool, leaving the rest to participate actively in soilC cycling. Of the sources, PS and FYM thus contributed more

    Table 5. Microbial biomass C (Cmic), mineralizable C (Cmin), basal soil respiration (BSR), microbial quotient (MQ), and respiratory quo-tient (qCO2) in soils at the 0- to 0.2-m depth under different treatments after 19 yr of ricewheat cropping.

    Treatment Cmic Cmin(024 d) BSR (1024 d) MQ qCO2

    g C kg1 g CO2C kg1C d1 kg Cmickg

    1Ctot kg CO2C kg1Cmicd

    1

    Fallow 0.47 ab 1.72 ab (12.3) 0.33 a 0.033 a 0.15 b

    Control 0.28 d 1.15 c (9.5) 0.21 c 0.023 c 0.17 a

    NPK 0.41 c 1.65 b (11.5) 0.31 b 0.029 b 0.17 a

    NPK + FYM 0.52 a 1.92 a (12.4) 0.33 a 0.033 a 0.15 b

    NPK + PS 0.48 ab 1.76 ab (11.5) 0.30 b 0.032 a 0.15 b

    NPK + GM 0.45 b 1.68 b (11.3) 0.31 b 0.031 ab 0.15 bOverall mean 0.43 1.65 (11.4) 0.30 0.030 0.16

    Fallow, no cultivation since inception; control, no NPK fertilizers or organics used; NPK, recommended rate of inorganic NPK fertilizer;FYM, farmyard manure; PS, paddy straw; GM, green manure.

    Within a column of a C pool, numbers followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different between treatments at P0.05 by Dun-cans multiple-range test.

    Values in parentheses indicate percentage of total organic C (Ctot).

    Table 6. Relationship of different soil organic C (SOC) pools withequivalent rice yield and sustainable yield index (SYI) under dif-ferent treatments after 19 yr of ricewheat cropping.

    Yield SYI

    SOC pool Equation R2 Equation R2

    Cmic Y= 3.60X+ 3.06 0.95 Y= 0.21X+ 0.67 0.68

    Cmin Y= 1.05X+ 2.66 0.68 Y= 0.05X+ 0.71 0.30

    Cfrac1 Y= 1.33X+ 10.56 0.92 Y= 0.07X+ 0.09 0.63

    Coc Y= 0.61X+ 8.36 0.92 Y= 0.03X+ 0.03 0.63

    Cmic, microbial biomass C; Cmin, mineralizable C; Cfrac1, very labile C;Coc, oxidizable organic C.

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    9/11

    SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    than GM in enriching the passive pool and thus subsequentlyhelped in building up C stocks in the soil. If one considers thehighly stable passive pool of SOC with turnover times in thecenturies used in the Century Model (Parton and Rasmussen,1994), however, the stability of the currently built-up passivepool of Cfract 3and Cfract 4through added organics during thelast 19 yr of the present experiment may not be alike.

    Mineralizable Carbon, Soil Respiration, and

    Microbial Biomass CarbonThe amount of C mineralized (11.4% of C tot) that weobserved (Table 5) within a short span of 24 d is typical in soilsof tropical and subtropical regions (Rudrappa et al., 2006). Theamount varied under different treatments, being lowest in thecontrol. This is due to the variable amounts of labile organicC fractions in soils under the treatments (Table 3). The higher

    value of Cmin content in the NPK fertilizer with organicamendments and fallow treatments may be attributed to thegood supply of labile C substrate in those treatments. The basalsoil respiration (Cminat 1024 d and BSR) per unit of SOCrepresents the performance of soil organic C decomposers andalso the quality of SOC under decomposition. Like Cmin, the

    BSR also was found to be higher in the NPK with organicsupplementation and fallow treatments. As mentioned above,the availability of easily decomposable organic matter and alsoreadily available nutrients in these treatments provided a con-ducive environment for microbial activity, resulting in a higherrate of respiration (Sayre et al., 2005). The mineralizable C,

    which provides an early indication of a possible degrading oraggrading effect of different management practices on soilquality (Powlson, 1994), was also lowest in the control treat-ment. This seems to be related to the unfavorable environmentin the control arising out of the depletion of nutrients due tocontinuous cropping without any fertilization. Balanced fertil-ization with C supplementation, however, provided a congenial

    environment for microbial growth and thus caused an increasein soil Cmicover that in the control.

    The MQ signifies microbial activity. It varied widely(0.0230.033) among the treatments (Table 5). This is, how-ever, within the range of 0.01 to 0.05 kg Cmickg

    1Ctotadvo-cated by Anderson and Domsch (1980). Its higher values inNPK plus organics and fallow treatments compared withthe control may be attributed to a better nutritional environ-ment in the former treatments. The results also suggest thatthe organic C under the former treatments is more stable thanin the control (Sparling et al., 1992). The lowest value of MQin the control soils indicates that the capacity of the soil for Ccycling has been impaired, signifying a degradation of its qual-

    ity (Dalal, 1998). A relationship between MQ and Ctotshowedthat MQ was directly influenced by Ctot(r= 0.80, P= 0.001).Haynes and Tregurtha (1991) also reported a decline in MQfrom 0.023 to 0.011 kg Cmickg

    1Ctotdue to a decrease inSOC from 65 to 15 g C kg1soil.

    The respiratory or metabolic quotient (the ratio of Cminand Cmic, qCO2) is an indicator of the efficiency of soil micro-organisms in processing residue or available soil C. Its value

    was significantly higher under the control and NPK fertilizerthan in the fallow and organic-amended soils (Table 5). Thehigher value of qCO2in the former treatments suggests a less

    efficient use of available C by the microbes there, whereas itslower value in the latter (fallow and organic-amended treat-ments) indicates their higher efficiency in preserving C in soils.There was, however, no difference in qCO2among the threeorganic amendments. Higher and lower values of qCO2asso-ciated with fertilizer and organic-amended treatments, respec-tively, have also been reported by many researchers (Fauci andDick, 1994; Lupwayi et al., 1998; Rudrappa et al., 2006).

    Although qCO2 undoubtedly indicates microbial efficiency,several other factors such as soil moisture and qualitativechanges within the microbial population (e.g., an increase inthe proportion of fungi) may explain the differences in qCO2

    within the treatments. For all these active C fractions, the fal-low treatment rather than the control treatment compared well

    with the fertilized and organic-amended treatments, mainlybecause the fallow treatment had experienced little stress fromcultivation and also contained high amounts of labile C pools.

    Relationship among Different Organic CarbonPools and with Crop Productivity

    The observed significant correlations among the pools ofC in the soil indicate the existence of a dynamic equilibrium

    among them. This means that depletion or enrichment in onewould shift the equilibrium and affect the size of the others.Such relationships, particularly for Cfrac1 and Coc with oth-ers, were stronger. This emphasizes the importance of monitor-ing these two pools for a better understanding of C cycling inthe soil. Relationships were also drawn between these pools ofC in the soil and the crop productivity of the system. Theserelationships of both yield and SYI were strong, particularly

    with Cfrac1, Coc, Cmin,and Cmic(Table 6). They accountedfor as much as 63, 63, 30, and 68% of the variability in SYIand 92, 92, 68, and 95% of the variability in rice equivalentyield, respectively. This suggests the importance of these poolsof SOC in influencing crop yield, possibly through maintain-

    ing better soil quality. Considering the relatively low cost andease of estimation and also its influence on yield, SYI, and Ccycling, Cfrac1appears to have an edge over the other pools ofC in the soil for its inclusion as a good indicator for routinemonitoring of soil health in the ricewheat agroecosystem.

    CONCLUSIONSWhile continuous ricewheat cropping without balanced

    fertilization (NPK) caused a significant depletion of SOC,the same with balanced fertilization maintained the level and, incombination with organics, significantly improved it. A majorfraction (~67%) of the C supplemented in the system throughorganic amendments (FYM, PS, and GM) was lost, however,

    and a small fraction was left to be stabilized into SOC. The rel-ative efficacy of the amendments for SOC building was FYM >PS > GM. To offset the loss and to maintain SOC, a minimumof 3.56 Mg C ha1yr1needed to be incorporated into thesoil in the form of organics. Of the several C pools analyzed,the passive pool constituted about 39% of the Ctot. A higherproportion (70.8%) of C that got stabilized into SOC from Cinputs, however, found its way to the passive pool, leaving asmaller part in the active pool. Mineralizable C (24 d) consti-tuted a large (~11.5%) proportion of Ctotin this subtropicalregion. Of the pools, Cfrac1, Coc, Cmin, and Cmic explained

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    10/11

    784 SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 MayJune 2008

    the variability in crop yield to a greater extent. Because of thelow cost and ease of estimation and also its influence on yieldand SYI, the Cfrac1 fraction of SOC can reasonably be usedas a good indicator for assessing soil health and productivity.

    An overall consideration of the results indicates that, of all thetreatments tested, balanced NPK fertilization along with anadequate amount of FYM is most suitable for the continuousricewheat cropping system in the subtropical Indo-GangeticPlains of India for improving the SOC stock and sustainingcrop productivity.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe are extremely grateful to Dr. L.N. Mandal, former professor ofsoil science, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal,for kindly going through a draft manuscript and offering valuablesuggestions for strengthening it. We also express our immense gratitudeto Dr. Bill Hardy, Science Editor and Publisher, Communicationand Publications Services, IRRI, for editing the manuscript. We arealso thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, NewDelhi, for funding the work through the World Bank assisted multi-institutional collaborative National Agricultural Technology Project.

    REFERENCES

    Anderson, J.P.E. 1982. Soil respiration. p. 837871. InA.L. Page et al. (ed.)Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties.

    2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.

    Anderson, T.H., and K.H. Domsch. 1980. Ratios of microbial biomass carbonto total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21:471479.

    Bhattacharyya, T., D.K. Pal, P. Chandran, C. Mandal, S.K. Ray, R.K. Gupta,

    and K.S. Gajbhiye. 2004. Managing soil carbon stocks in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. RWC-CIMMYT, New Delhi.

    Blair, G.J., R.D.B. Lefroy, and L. Lisle. 1995. Soil carbon fractions based on

    their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management

    index for agricultural systems. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 46:14591466.Blake, G.R., and K.H. Hartge. 1986. Bulk density. p. 363375. InA. Klute

    (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods.

    2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.Bronson, K.F., K.G. Cassman, R. Wassmann, D.C. Olk, M van. Noordwijk, and

    D.P. Garrity. 1998. Soil carbon dynamics in different cropping systems inprincipal eco-regions of Asia. p. 3557. InR. Lal et al. (ed.) Managementof carbon sequestration in soil. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Bundy, L.G., and J.M. Bremner. 1972. A simple titrimetric method for determination

    of inorganic carbon in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36:273275.Chan, K.Y., A. Bowman, and A. Oates. 2001. Oxidizable organic carbon

    fractions and soil quality changes in an Oxic Paleustalf under different

    pasture leys. Soil Sci. 166:6167.

    Chaudhury, J., U.K. Mandal, K.L. Sharma, H. Ghosh, and B. Mandal. 2005.Assessing soil quality under long-term rice-based cropping systems.

    Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 36:121.

    Cole, C.V., K. Flach, J. Lee, D. Sauerbeck, and B. Stewart. 1993. Agriculturalsources and sinks of carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut. 70:111122.

    Dalal, R.C. 1998. Soil microbial biomasswhat do the numbers really mean?

    Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 38:649665.Dormaar, J.F., and U.J. Pittman. 1980. Decomposition of organic residues as

    affected by various dryland spring wheatfallow rotations. Can. J. Soil

    Sci. 60:97106.Fauci, M.F., and R.P. Dick. 1994. Soil microbial dynamics: Short- and long-term

    effects of inorganic and organic nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58:801806.

    Franzluebbers, A.J., and M.A. Arshad. 1996. Soil organic matter pools during

    early adoption of conservation tillage in northwestern Canada. Soil Sci.Soc. Am. J. 60:14221427.

    Gregorich, E.G., and H.H. Janzen. 1996. Storage of soil carbon in the light

    fraction and macroorganic matter. p. 167190. InM.A. Carter and B.A.Stewart (ed.) Structure and organic matter storage in agricultural soils.

    Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, FL.

    Halvorson, A.D., B.J. Wienhold, and A.L. Black. 2002. Tillage, nitrogen, and croppingsystem effects on soil carbon sequestration. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:906912.

    Haynes, R.J., and R. Tregurtha. 1991. Effects of increasing periods underintensive arable vegetable production on biological, chemical and

    physical indices of soil quality. Biol. Fertil. Soils 28:259266.

    Janzen, H.H. 1987. Effect of fertilizer on soil productivity in long-term springwheat rotations. Can. J. Soil Sci. 67:165174.

    Jenny, H., and S.P. Raychaudhuri. 1960. Effect of climate and cultivation on

    nitrogen and organic matter resources in Indian soils. Indian Council ofAgric. Res., New Delhi.

    Kong, A.Y.Y., J. Six, D.C. Bryant, R.F. Denison, and C. Van Kessel. 2005.

    The relationship between carbon input, aggregation, and soil organiccarbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.

    J. 69:10781085.

    Ladha, J.K., D. Dawe, H. Pathak, A.T. Padre, R.L. Yadav, B. Singh, et al. 2003.

    How extensive are yield declines in long-term ricewheat experiments inAsia? Field Crops Res. 81:159180.

    Lupwayi, N.Z., W.A. Rice, and G.W. Clayton. 1998. Soil microbial biomass

    and carbon dioxide flux under wheat as influenced by tillage and croprotation. Can. J. Soil Sci. 79:273280.

    Majumder, B. 2007. Soil organic carbon pools and biomass productivity under

    agro-ecosystems of subtropical India. Ph.D. diss. Jadavpur Univ., Calcutta.Mandal, B. 2005. Assessment and improvement of soil quality and resilience

    for rainfed production systems. Completion Rep., Natl. Agric. Technol.

    Project. Indian Council of Agric. Res., New Delhi.McLauchlan, K.K., and S.E. Hobbie. 2004. Comparison of labile soil organic

    matter fractionation techniques. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:16161625.

    Nelson, D.W., and L.E. Sommers. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and

    organic matter. p. 101129. InA.L. Page et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis.

    Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.Page, A.L., R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney (ed.). 1982. Methods of soil analysis.

    Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.Parton, W.J., and P.E. Rasmussen. 1994. Long-term effects of crop management

    in wheatfallow: II. CENTURY model simulations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.

    J. 58:530536.Pastor, J., B. Dewey, R.J. Naiman, P.F. McInnes, and Y. Cohen. 1993. Moose

    browsing and soil fertility in the boreal forests of Isle Royale National

    Park. Ecology 74:467480.Paul, E.A., D. Harris, M.J. Klug, and R.W. Ruess. 1999. The determination

    of microbial biomass. p. 291317. InG.P. Robertson (ed.) Standard soil

    methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

    Powlson, D.S. 1994. The soil microbial biomass before, beyond and back. p.320. InK. Ritz et al. (ed.) Beyond the biomass. John Wiley & Sons,

    Chichester, UK.

    Rahn, C.R., G.D. Bending, R. Lillywhite, and M.K. Turner. 1999. Chemicalcharacterisation of arable and vegetable crop residue material: A

    comparison of methods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 79:17151721.

    Rasmussen, P.E., R.R. Allmaras, C.R. Rohde, and N.C. Roager, Jr. 1980. Cropresidue influences on soil carbon and nitrogen in a wheatfallow system.

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:596600.

    Rasmussen, P.E., and H.P. Collins. 1991. Long-term impacts of tillage,fertilizer, and crop residue on soil organic matter in temperate semiarid

    regions. Adv. Agron. 45:93134.

    Rasmussen, P.E., and R.W. Smiley. 1997. Soil carbon and nitrogen change in

    long-term agricultural experiments at Pendleton, Oregon. p. 353360.InE.A. Paul et al. (ed.) Soil organic matter in temperate agroecosystems:

    Long-term experiments in North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Rudrappa, L., T.J. Purakayestha, D. Singh, and S. Bhadraray. 2006. Long-termmanuring and fertilization effects on soil organic carbon pools in a Typic

    Haplustept of semi-arid sub-tropical India. Soil Tillage Res. 88:180192.

    Saito, M., and I. Watanabe. 1978. Organic matter production in rice fieldflood water. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 24:427440.

    Sayre, K.D., A. Limon-Ortega, B. Govaerts, A. Martinez, and M. Cruz-Cano.

    2005. Effects following twelve years of irrigated permanent raised bedplanting systems in northwest Mexico. p. 99106. InB. Badalikova (ed.)

    Proc. Conf. on Soil: Agriculture, Environment, Landscape, Prag, Ceska.

    29 June1 July 2005. ISTRO-Czech Branch, Brno, Czech Republic.

    Seneviratne, G. 2000. Litter quality and nitrogen release in tropical agriculture.Biol. Fertil. Soils 31:6064.

    Sharma, K.L., U.K. Mandal, K. Srinivas, K.P.R. Vittal, B. Mandal, G.J. Kusuma,

    and V. Ramesh. 2005. Long-term soil management effects on crop yieldsand soil quality in a dryland Alfisol. Soil Tillage Res. 83:246259.

  • 8/10/2019 Soil organic carbon (SOC)

    11/11

    SSSAJ: Volume 72: Number 3 May June 2008

    Sherrod, L.A., G.A. Peterson, D.G. Westfall, and L.R. Ahuja. 2005. Soilorganic carbon pools after 12 years in no-till dryland agroecosystems.

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:15331543.

    Singh, M.V., R.H. Wanjari, and T. Adhkari. 2004. Nutrient dynamics, cropproductivity, and sustainability under long-term fertilizer experiments in

    India. All India Coordinated Res. Project on Long-Term Fertility Exp.,

    Indian Inst. of Soil Sci., Bhopal.Singh, R.P., S.K. Das, U.M. Bhaskara Rao, and M. Narayana Reddy. 1990.

    Sustainability index under different management. Annu. Rep. Central

    Res. Inst. for Dryland Agric., Hyderabad, India.Six, J., E.T. Elliott, K. Paustian, and J.W. Doran. 1998. Aggregation and soil

    organic matter accumulation in cultivated and native grassland soils. Soil

    Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62:13671377.

    Six, J., C. Feller, K. Denef, S.M. Ogle, J.C. de Moraes, and A. Albrecht. 2002.Soil organic matter, biota, and aggregation in temperate and tropical

    soilseffects of no-tillage. Agronomie 22:755775.

    Sparling, G.P., T.G. Shepherd, and H.A. Kettles. 1992. Changes in soil organicC, microbial C and aggregate stability under continuous maize and cereal

    cropping, and after restoration to pasture in soils from the Manawatu

    region. Soil Tillage Res. 24:225241.Swarup, A., M.C. Manna, and G.B. Singh. 2000. Impact of land use and

    management practices on organic carbon dynamics in soils of India.

    p. 261281. InR. Lal et al. (ed.) Global climate change and tropicalecosystems. Adv. Soil Sci. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Thangaraj, M., and J.C. OToole. 1986. Development and testing of an

    improved soilroot sampling technique for rice in flooded puddled soil.

    Agron. J. 78:940942.

    Tian, G., B.T. Kang, and T. Brussaard. 1992. Biological effects of plant residues

    with contrasting chemical compositions under humid tropical conditions:Decomposition and nutrient release. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24:10511060.

    Vance, E.D., P.C. Brookes, and D.S. Jenkinson. 1987. An extraction method for

    measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19:703707.Verma, T.S., and R.M. Bhagat. 1992. Impact of rice straw management

    practices on yield, nitrogen uptake and soil properties in a wheatrice

    rotation in northern India. Fert. Res. 33:97106.Villegas-Pangga, G., G.J. Blair, and R. Lefroy. 2000. Measurement of

    decomposition and associated nutrient release from straw (Oryza sativaL.)

    of different rice varieties using a perfusion system. Plant Soil 223:111.Voroney, R.P., and E.A. Paul. 1984. Determination of kCand kNin situ for

    calibration of the chloroform fumigationincubation method. Soil Biol.

    Biochem. 16:914.

    Walkley, A. 1947. A critical examination of a rapid method for determiningorganic carbon in soils: Effect of variations in digestion conditions and

    inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci. 63:251263.

    Walkley, A., and I.A. Black. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff methodfor determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the

    chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37:2938.

    Weil, R.R., K.R. Islam, M.A. Stine, J.B. Gruver, and S.E. Samson-Liebig.2003. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified

    method for laboratory and field use. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 18:317.

    Wu, T., J.J. Schoenau, F. Li, P. Qian, S.S. Malhi, and Y. Shi. 2003. Effectof tillage and rotation on organic carbon forms of chernozemic soils in

    Saskatchewan. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 166:328335.

    Yadav, R.L., B.S. Dwivedi, and P.S. Pandey. 2000. Ricewheat cropping

    system assessment of sustainability under green manuring and chemical

    fertilizer inputs. Field Crops Res. 65:1530.