SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY · PDF file4/9/2010 · an application of soft systemsan...

SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY

SUDARSONO

SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY

SUDARSONO16 SEPTEMBER 2011

© Pusdiklat Spimnas 2011

TujuanTujuan

MembentukSystems

MenguasaiSystemsSystems

thinkerSystems

methodology


Peserta PimTi Sebagai Systems Thinker?Peserta PimTi Sebagai Systems Thinker?

Peter Checkland Kim Dae Jung Wali/Wawali Solo


TIDAK MUDAH MEMBENTUK SYSTEMS THINKER


Penguatan Sinergi Pemerintah-Masyarakat-Dunia Usaha Dalam Rangka Akselerasi Pencapaian

Pembangunan BerkeadilanQualitative Research

1 Phenomenological

Quantitative Research

1 Positivist1. Phenomenological2. Inductive3. Holistic4. Subjective/insider centered

1. Positivist2. Hypothetical/deductive3. Particularistic4. Objective/outsider orientedj /

5. Process Oriented6. Anthropological worldview7. Relative lack of control

j /5. Outcome oriented6. Natural science world view7. Attempt to control variables

8. Goal: understand actor’s view9. Dynamic Reality10. Discovery oriented

8. Goal: find fact and causes9. Static reality assumed10. Verification oriented

SWOT or BLACK BOX analysis?


Penguatan Sinergi Pemerintah MasyarakatPenguatan Sinergi Pemerintah-Masyarakat-Dunia Usaha Dalam Rangka Akselerasi Pencapaian Pembangunan Berkeadilan

Seeing the company as a System

Seeing the issue as a systemSeeing the issue as a system


AKSELERASI PENCAPAIAN PEMBANGUNAN BERKEADILAN

MASYARAKATPEMERINTAH

DUNIA USAHA

Seeing the issue as a system?


ParadigmsParadigms


The Complexity Turn

1 The social and cultural sciences have experienced a whole1. The social and cultural sciences have experienced a wholearray of incursions over the past fiew decades.

2. This turn derives from development within physics, biology,, ,mathematics, ecology, chemistry and economics, fromrevival of neo-vitalism in social though, and from theemergence of a more general ‘complex structure of feeling’that challenges some everyday notions of social order.

3 An array of transformations took place loosely known as3. An array of transformations took place, loosely known aschaos, complexity, non-linierity and dynamical systemsanalysis.y

4. A shift from reductionist analysis to those that involve thestudy of complex adaptive (‘vital’) matter.(John Urry, 2005; Global Complexity, 2003, Automobilities, 2005)


Dynamic complexity Di mana hubungan antara sebab dengan

akibatnya bersifat halus tidak kentaray(subtle).

Di mana pengaruh intervensi dalam kurunk id k b i k ( b i )waktu tertentu tidak begitu nampak (obvious)

Di mana tindakan yang sama memiliki efekjangka panjang yang sangat berbeda denganjangka panjang yang sangat berbeda denganefek jangka pendeknya.

Di mana suatu tindakan memiliki sejumlahD mana suatu t ndakan mem l k sejumlahpengaruh pada suatu bagian yang sangatberbeda dengan pengaruhnya pada bagian laindalam sistem yang sama. (Senge, 1990)


Qualitative Quantitative Systems Thinking Approach

Phenomenological Positivist Interpretivism, and Realism

Inductive Hypothetical/deductive Seeing interrelationship rather than things (holonic), systemic.

Holistic Particularistic A discipline for seeing wholes

Subjective/insider centered Objective/outsider oriented Duality of structure, integrative-perspective, both objectivist and subjectivist

Process Oriented Outcome oriented 1. A scientific approach to problem-solving

2. Action research

Anthropological worldview Natural Science world view 1. Take the world to be holonic

2. Creates the process of enquiry as a holon

Relative lack of control Attempt to control variables 1. Structuration

2. Wholism

Goal: understand actor’s Goal: find fact and causes 1. Optimum solution

view 2. Improvement for problematical situation

Dynamic Reality Static reality assumed Dynamic complexity

Discovery oriented Verification orieted 1 An approach to understanding the behaviour of complex systems over time Discovery oriented Verification orieted 1. An approach to understanding the behaviour of complex systems over time.

2. A. reasonably comprehensive understanding of the interrelationships of the

various aspects of the problem situation


Philosophical approach Purpose Constructivist

Ontological position (about the form and Reality exists Multiple perceptions of reality

nature of reality) Systems do exist and do have a clear purpose

and well-defined boundaries

Systems do exist only to the extent that

people agree on the goals, the boundaries and

their components

E i l i l i i Ob i l d b bj i N l b i i ibl Epistemological position

(about the relationship between the researcher and

the researched

Observations are not coloured by subjective

aspects of the scientist or his/her instruments

Neutral observations are impossible

How are phenomena experienced? Biophysical and social phenomena are

experienced as constant, regular, reoccurring

and predictable

Biophysical and social phenomena are

experienced as dynamic, chaotic, changing

and unpredictable

Research design Strong focus on the testing of hypothesis

Focus on the use of quantitative methods

Focus on improving current problem

Less focus on the use of hypothesis

Focus on the use of qualitative methods

Focusing on how to realize a desired future p g p g

situation

Purpose Objective knowledge

Generalization

Socially constructed knowledge to increase

our understanding for more effective action

Maximizing efficiency Particularities or generalizaions for one

particular context

Innovations


HARD AND SOFT SYSTEMS THINKINGHARD AND SOFT SYSTEMS THINKING

C Jostin Khisty, 1995


Contoh model dalam Hard Systems: Dynamics Knowing Organization(free method system dynamics)

AttributingCompetency

Belief in Tech &Ethics

EnactedOpportunity

Ecological Change

Customer NeedSolution

KnowledgeIdentified

Identity

IdentityConstruction-

CustomerTraining

Revenue

Innovation/CustomizedProduct

Friction ofIdentity

+

B

Knowledge

Quality of ProjectE ti

Revenue

OrganizationalKnowledgeRepository

SharedKnowledge

Knew Knowledgefrom Task

SalesIdentity

Constructionof 3 CoPs +

+

+

Execution

ProjectCompletion

New Project

Staff

Staff KnowlegeGap

Sumber: Wahyudi Atmoko, disertasi program doktor




DUNIA USAHA

SYSTEMS THINKING


Ban+ kerangka+mesin+suku cadang lain= Ban+kerangka+mesin+suku cadang lain=

Konsep Serba Sistem: Sebuah adaptive whole

g g

gundukan suku cadangg g

mobil

Tidak ada proses komunikasi dan Ada proses komunikasi dan interTidak ada proses komunikasi daninter relasi

Ada proses komunikasi dan inter relasi

Tidak ada proses kontrol Ada proses kontrol

Tidak ada layered structure Ada layered structure

Tidak ada emergent property Ada emergent property

Tidak ada lingkungan Ada lingkungan

Bukan sebuah SYSTEM Sebuah SYSTEM

Bukan adaptive whole Sebuah adaptive WholeBukan adaptive whole Sebuah adaptive Whole

Human Activity System= purpesful activity system= adaptive wholeHuman Activity System= purpesful activity system= adaptive whole


Akselerasi Pencapaian Pembangunan Berkeadilan =

?systems apa?

Natural systems

?

Dunia UsahaPemerintah Designed

Abstract Systems

Human Activity Systems

MasyarakatSocial and Cultural Systems

Designed Physical Systems


SOFT AND HARD SYSTEMS THINKINGSOFT AND HARD SYSTEMS THINKING

SSM SYSTEM DYNAMICSSSM

Problematic Sit ti

• Improving, Changing, Enhancing•Dealing with complexity

SYSTEM DYNAMICS

Problems

• Seeking solutions• Dealing with complexity

Situation

•Action Research•Systems thinking based

Problems

• A scientific approach to problem solving• Systems thinking based

Methodology

C t l M d l

Methodology

• Systems thinking based

•Models

Modeling and Simulation

•Conceptual Model•No validation•No simulation•A Learning system

Modeling and simulation

•With or without model validation•With or without simulation•With or without software





SYSTEM DYNAMICS

Designed Abstract SystemsHuman Activity Systems Designed Abstract Systems

Seven‐stage model CLD, SFD, BOT, Archetypes

Two streams of enquiry With or without simulation


th ld t i1. Observer (hard systems methodology)

SOFT AND HARD SYSTEMS THINKING

the world: systemicsystem

system

the observer’sperceived real world

system

I h h I

the process ofi i t i

2. Observer (soft systems methodology)

I spy systems which I can engineer

inquiry: systemic

the observer’sperceived real world

I spy complexity and confusion; but I can organize exploration of it as a learning systems

3. Others: cognitive mapping, causal mapping, SODA.



?


DUNIA USAHA

?





SYSTEM DYNAMICS

Designed Abstract SystemsHuman Activity Systems Designed Abstract Systems

Seven‐stage model CLD, SFD, BOT, Archetypes

Two streams of enquiry With or without simulation


Akselerasi Pencapaian Pembangunan k d lBerkeadilan

Human Activity Systemsy y

Systems of Activities Social systems

Relationships

Logical dependenciesInterpersonal

Elements

Activities (what) People doing the activities (how)Activities (what) People doing the activities (how)


The conventional seven-stage model of SSM

Problem situation considered problematic

Action to improve the problem situation

Changes: systematically desirable, culturally

feasible

Comparison of models and real worldProblems situation

expressedexpressed

Real world

Systems thinking about real world

Root definition of relevant f l ti it t

Conceptual models of the systems (holons) named in the rootpurposeful activity systems named in the root

definition


1 Halaman 27 s/d 52 Peter Checkland dan Jim1.Halaman 27 s/d 52 Peter Checkland dan Jim Scholes, 1990

2 Peter Checkland and John Poulter 20062.Peter Checkland and John Poulter, 2006.


The general form of purposeful activity model

Activity 1 Activity 2

3

4

OPERATIONS

65

6

Take control7

MONITORING

Monitor

Take controlaction

MONITORINGAND CONTROL

Monitor1‐7 Define measures

of performance


Appraise the color

Model dari sebuah tindakan yang punya maksud mengecat pagar

ppscheme ofd property

Decide the scope of the task:‐importance‐ resources

12

OPERATIONS3

Prepare fencefor paint 4

Obtain paint Obtain brush65

Take control

Apply paint to fence

5

7

Monitor

Take controlaction

7

Monitor1‐7 Define measures

of performance






feasible


expressedexpressed

Real world


Root definition of relevant f l ti it t

Conceptual models of the systems (holons) named in the rootpurposeful activity systems named in the root

definition





Changes:systematically desirable,

culturally feasible

Comparison of models and real world

Stream of Cultural Enquiry: Analysis One, Two, Three One, Two, Three

(Rich Picture)Real world


Root definition of relevant purposeful activity

Conceptual models of the systems (holons)

named in the rootp p ysystems

named in the root definition






feasible


expressed (Rich Picture)expressed (Rich Picture)

Real world


Stream of Lagic Based Enquiry

Stream of Logic Based Enquiryq y

Root definition

q yConceptual models


SSMSSM

CULTURAL BASED STREAM OF ANALYSIS

LOGIC BASED OF ANALYSIS STREAM OF

THINKING


CULTURAL STREAM OF THINKINGCULTURAL STREAM OF THINKING

ANALYSIS ONE

RICH PICTURE

ANALYSIS TWO

ANALYSIS THREE


LOGIC BASED STREAM OF THINKINGLOGIC BASED STREAM OF THINKING

SELECTING RELEVANT SYSTEM

CONCEPTUAL MODEL

CATWOEMODELLING


SSM : Analisis CATWOE

Elements of CATWOE DescriptionCustomers Who are the victims or beneficieariesCustomers Who are the victims or beneficiearies

of the transformation

Actors Who make the transformation happenppTransformation What are the inputs and

(transformed) outputssWeltanschaung What makes the transformationWeltanschaung What makes the transformation

meaningful in context?

Owners Who could stop the transformationOwners Who could stop the transformationprocess

EnvironmentalConstraint

Which elements outside the systemsare taken as givenConstraint are taken as given


SSM as an Action Research(Surakarta and Depok)

1. To Introduce a new version of social developmentconcept.

2 To identify a set of social development indicators2. To identify a set of social development indicatorsbased on the new concept of social development.

3. Basic elements of social intercourse: structuralelements cultural elements and social processelements, cultural elements and social process.


45


46


47


KABUR BERTAHAN

48BERTAHAN DAN KELILING

Pendatang baru


Menolak relokasi Mediator

49

Gerobak bernomorTanpa relokasi


Perda 3/2008

Demo PKLPerda 3/2008

1. Pasal 16 ayat 1, laranganmembeli barangmembeli barangdagangan PKL di tempatyang tidak berijin

2. Pasal 16 ayat 3b, KTPSolo

1. Ketidakberhasilan di salam satu tempat relokasi di belakang1 p gkampus UNS

2. Pembangunan sosial di kabupaten sekitar atau daerah lain yangjauhjauh


MENUJU KEBAHAGIAAN?MENUJU KEBAHAGIAAN?


52


AN APPLICATION OF SOFT SYSTEMSAN APPLICATION OF SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY TO

CONCEPTUALIZE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE

INFORMAL SECTOR

Sudarsono HardjosoekartoDepartment of Sociology

F lt f S i l d P liti l S iFaculty of Social and Political Sciences The University of Indonesia

Campus FISIP-UI, Depok 16424Indonesia

Email: [email protected]


Abstract

This paper proposes a new version of social development concept which is moreThis paper proposes a new version of social development concept which is moresociological in the sense that it emphasizes on the improvement of basic elementsof social intercourse, namely structural elements, cultural elements, and processelements. Field research was conducted in two cities to identify the extent of socialfy fdevelopment - as indicated by the improvement of basic elements of socialintercourse –in the area of street vendor promotion program. Soft SystemsMethodology is being applied as a tool to enquire social development process atthe area of the informal sector, to select some related programs or activities thatcould be identified as the most powerful indicators of social development, and toconstruct a new version of social development index.

Keywords: Soft Systems Methodology, social development index, basic elementsof social intercourse, informal sector.


22‐24 November 2011Venue: Hotel Pullman Dubai Mall of the Emirates

KEY NOTE SPEAKER IN SOCIAL SCIENCESProfessor John UrryDepartment of Sociology,Lancaster University

KEY NOTE SPEAKER IN BUSINESSProfessor Peter ChecklandLancaster University,Lancaster LA1 4YDLancaster University,

Lancaster, LA1 4YD.Lancaster, LA1 4YD.


Dear Sudarsono Hardjosoekarto

18 Agustus 2011

Dear Sudarsono HardjosoekartoThis is regarding your paper:Title: AN APPLICATION OF SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY TO CONCEPTUALIZE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR INFORMAL SECTORCode No.: 310301

Thank you for submitting your revised paper.Congratulations! In communication with the article review team the ERPBSS committeeCongratulations! In communication with the article review team, the ERPBSS committee has now decided to fully accept your paper.

Thank you

Regards,

Donya SaberiyConference Assistant

First International Conference onFirst International Conference onEmerging Research Paradigms in Business and Social Sciences


JURNAL RISET

1 R P liti A t 2010

JURNA RIS T

1 Rencana Penelitian Agustus 2010

2 Riset Lapangan November 2010

3 Riset Lapangan Maret 2011p g

4 Abstract 30 Maret 2011

5 Draft Pertama 09 Juni 2011

6 Komentar pertama 08 Juli 2011

7 Draft Kedua 10 Agustus 2011

8 K t K d 15 A t 20118 Komentar Kedua 15 Agustus 2011

9 Draft Ketiga 16 Agustus 2011

10 Paper diterima 18 Agustus 2011p g


SYSTEMS THINKERSYSTEMS THINKER


collusive tie between import+

+collusive tie betweenPoliticians andbusiness

lack ofdemocracy

governmentInterruption in financialactivity

nationalcompetitiveness export

d l i

surplus in foreigncurrencies

foreign currencyreserve

financial crisis

+

+

+

++

++

+

--

-

-

--

activity

corruption

marketcompetition

transparancy andadvanced technology

complainof labor

foreign

nationalcredibility

speculativeinvestment

industrial

+

+

++

+

+ +++

++

+

-

--

-

-p

growth first policy

level of economicactivity

jobflexibility in labormarakets

unenployment

pain sharing betweenEmployer and ompleyee

investment industrialrestructuring value of

currency

restrukturing of

++

+ +

+ +

+

++

+--

activity

banckrupcy

money flow

investment

loanBIS ratio

gfinancial institution

interest rate

+

+

++

++

+-

--

--

-

Peta Kausal Presiden Korea Selatan Kim Dae JungPeta Kausal Presiden Korea Selatan Kim Dae Jung


“Krisis finansial Korea Selatandisebabkan oleh kegagalan lembaga‐disebabkan oleh kegagalan lembagalembaga keuangan domestik danh d i i l thancurnya daya saing nasional, sertatidak adanya demokrasi”

Presiden Kim Dae Jung


CAUSAL MAPCAUSAL MAP PRESIDEN KIMPRESIDEN KIM ::

“Serba Sistem Krisis Korea Dipercaya Ditandai oleh

CAUSAL MAPCAUSAL MAP PRESIDEN KIM PRESIDEN KIM ::

Systems Building Block: BALANCING”.

b k d h k b d l hKebijakan yg ditempuh atas krisis tsb adalahpenyehatan seluruh variabel dari serba sistem krisiskorea yg bersifat balancing melalui reformasi politikdan institusi finansial.


Currency values of

Competitiveness ofOther countries export

Nationalcompetitiveness

Cost import

++

+-

--

Value of currency

yOther countries Opportunity for

Speculativeinvestment

Prosper-thy-neighbourpolicy

Wealth of othernation

Wealth of nation

Capability to defendAgainst speculativeinvestment National credibility

Speculativeinvestment

+

+

++

+ +

+

+

+

+

+

-

+--

-

Value of currency

Interest rate

Purchasing power

immigration

stability

Investmentt it

Wealth of nation

bankkrupcyStock value

Market size

+

++

+

++

++

+

-

-

+- -

Purchasing power

wage

inflationopportunity

Foreign investment+ +

-

+

-

Peta Kausal Perdana Menteri Malaysia Dr Mahatir MuhammadPeta Kausal Perdana Menteri Malaysia Dr Mahatir MuhammadPeta Kausal Perdana Menteri Malaysia Dr. Mahatir MuhammadPeta Kausal Perdana Menteri Malaysia Dr. Mahatir Muhammad


“Krisis ekonomi moneter Malaysiadisebabkan oleh kegiatan investasispekulatif orang asing yangspekulatif orang asing yangmenggerogoti kekayaan negara”

PM. Mahathir MuhammadPM. Mahathir Muhammad


CAUSAL MAPCAUSAL MAP

“Serba sistem krisis Malaysia dipercaya ditandai

DR MAHATHIR MUHAMMADDR MAHATHIR MUHAMMAD :

oleh systems building block Negative ReinforcingLoops (lingkaran setan)”.

Kebijakan pemulihan yg ditempuh adalahmemotong lingkaran krisis yg bersifat lingkarang g yg gsetan tsb al dg cara melarang perdagangan ringgitdan menetapkan nilai tukar tetap.


Presiden Soeharto“Pembuatan Mercedez kurang lebih dua k li d i il i t b h b t

Presiden Soeharto

kali dari nilai tambah pembuatan Vokswagen, maka added value dalam pembuatan pesawat terbang akan berjumlah puluhan kali dari added value j ppembuatan mobil Mercedez”.

““SayaSaya yakinyakin, IPTN , IPTN dapatdapat bersaingbersaing didipasaranpasaran internasionalinternasional”.”.

68


Pembangunan Berkeadilan (2011)

Tokyo 1990


Presiden Soeharto

““LangkahLangkah--langkahlangkah pentingpenting lainnyalainnya

Presiden Soeharto

gg gg p gp g yyadalahadalah ……....,, menghapuskanmenghapuskan monopolimonopolisertaserta menghapusmenghapus kemudahankemudahan--g pg pkemudahankemudahan khususkhusus untukuntuk mobilmobilnasionalnasional dandan IndustriIndustri PesawatPesawatTerbangTerbang Nusantara”Nusantara”..

70


Presiden BJ Habibie“Kenyataan-kenyataan ini, membangkitkan kembalikesadaran kita bahwa tidak mungkin kita akangberhasil meningkatkan kesejahteraan rakyat, jika kitatidak sungguh-sungguh membangun ekonomi yangb b k ”berbasiskan pertanian”.

“Di era reformasi ini saya menggariskan“Di era reformasi ini, saya menggariskankebijakan agar pembangunan sektor

t i k b li j di kt d lpertanian kembali menjadi sektor andalandalam pembangunan kita”

71

15 Agustus 1998


Pailit PT DI Lompatan Raksasa Yang Terantuk diPailit PT DI, Lompatan Raksasa Yang Terantuk diPengadilan

Jakarta (ANTARA News) Pekik haru dan penuh syukur segera menggema diJakarta (ANTARA News) ‐ Pekik haru dan penuh syukur segera menggema diruang Pengadilan Negeri (PN) Jakarta Pusat, Selasa (4/9), ketika majelishakim memaklumatkan PT Dirgantara Indonesia (DI) memenuhi syarat untukdinyatakan pailit.dinyatakan pailit.

Entah apa yang terbayang dalam pikiran ratusan mantan karyawan PT DIsaat mendengar gugatan pailit mereka dikabulkan untuk seluruhnya.

Mungkin masa depan yang lebih baik, karena kompensasi pesangon dantunjangan hari tua yang mereka tuntut selama empat tahun dapat segeraterbayar melalui pelelangan aset PT DI yang telah dinyatakan bangkrut.


Indonesia Impor Lele dan Teri

IMPOR LELEIMPOR LELE

LELE IMPOR 7.500 RP/KGLELE DOMESTIK 10 000 Rp/KGLELE DOMESTIK 10.000 Rp/KG

73

IMPOR BUAH CHINA


SYSTEMS THINKING for ADULTSADULTS

74


JALAN PANJANG


KENDALA MEMBENTUK PESERTA PIMPTI SEBAGAI SYSTEMS THINKERSEBAGAI SYSTEMS THINKER

The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.


KETIDAKBERDAYAAN BELAJARKETIDAKBERDAYAAN BELAJARKETIDAKBERDAYAAN BELAJARKETIDAKBERDAYAAN BELAJAR

1.1. I am my positionI am my positiony py p2.2. The enemy is out thereThe enemy is out there33 The illusion of taking chargeThe illusion of taking charge3.3. The illusion of taking chargeThe illusion of taking charge4.4. The fixation on eventsThe fixation on events55 The parable of boiled frogThe parable of boiled frog5.5. The parable of boiled frogThe parable of boiled frog6.6. The delusion of learning from The delusion of learning from

e periencee perienceexperience experience 7.7. The myth of the management teamThe myth of the management team

77


1. A PAINFUL PROCESS

2. LEARNING DISABILITIES

Instrumen Hukum


K l RDG UU

RDG DAMKAR

1999 : Keluar RDG UU 5/1974 Dj Otda2000: Keluar RDG UU 5/1974 Sekjen2001 : Tidak Keluar RDG UU 22/1999 Dj Otda2001 : Tidak Keluar RDG UU 22/1999 Dj Otda

Geser ke Ka Badan Diklat, dllDosen & Petani

2002 : Keluar RDG UU 22/1999 belum ada Keppres 80/2003

Dosen & Petani

2002 : Keluar RDG UU 22/1999 belum ada Keppres 80/2003

Daud: 18 Tahun &Wafat di Tahanan

Hari Sabarno

2010Wafat di Tahanan

Oentarto: 3 tahun

79

Gub: Riau, Jabar, Kepri, Wali Kota: Makasar, Medan, dll


SYSTEMS THINKING SYSTEMS THINKING FOR KIDSFOR KIDS


SYSTEMS THINKING FOR KIDSSYSTEMS THINKING FOR KIDS

1. We can’t manage dynamic complexity systems by fragmented viewfragmented view

2. It’s difficult for adults to learn about systems thinking3. Rethinking learning: an expectation to kids education

I believe we should give students a moreeffective way of interpreting the worldeffective way of interpreting the worldaround them. They should gain a greaterand well founded confidence forand well-founded confidence formanaging their lives and the situationthey encounter (Jay Forester 1994)they encounter (Jay Forester, 1994)


1 Love to learn1. Love to learn2.Will to risk3 Try it3.Try it4.Explore it (Mary Shcheetz, 1996)

1. K-12 kids learning systems thinking2. USA, Taiwan, etc.

a A happy learning experiencea. A happy learning experienceb. To enhance their creativityc. To enhance their presenting abilityp g yd. To enhance their analyzing abilitye. To enhance their ability to understand

interrelationship


Systems thinking for kids


PAUD Konvensional


Bimbingan Minat Belajar Anak


90


2008 - 2011

9,600

10,800

12,000

6,000

7,200

8,400

2,400

3,600

4,800

0

1,200

JAN

FEB

MA

R

AP

R

MEI

JUN

JUL

AG

UST

SEP

OK

T

NO

P

DES

JAN

FEB

MA

R

AP

R

MEI

JUN

JUL

AG

UST

SEP

OK

T

NO

P

DES

JAN

FEB

MA

R

AP

R

MEI

JUN

JUL

AG

UST

SEP

OK

T

NO

P

DES

JAN

FEB

2008 2009 2010 2011

SPP: 175 ribu/siswa KualitasGaji guru minimal 1 juta/bln Masyarakat yang menilai


Aku naik motor kesekolah diantark k k ksama ibu naik motor mio motor ibuwa a hitam moto papa j ga wa awarna hitam motor papa juga warnahitam dijalan banyak motorj yUmur 5 tahun


Saya kalau sore sore makan buburayam pakai krupuk dan kacang truspakai kecap makan sama bunda samap padik rasanya enak sekali kalau bundabuburnya dikasi sambal Usia 6 tahunbuburnya dikasi sambal Usia 6 tahun


Aku mau beli tas baru belinya di pasar pagi tas barunyaAku mau beli tas baru belinya di pasar pagi tas barunyaaku bawa ke sekolah temanku pada lihat tas barukutemanku pada mau tas baruku aku pergi lagi ke pasar pagik ik t b k k li k kaku ikut bersama mama aku senang sekali karena akusudah diajak pergi aku masuk kedalam lihat tasnya bagussemuanya aku jadi mau semuanya esok harinya akuy j y ykesekolah tasnya diambil sama mama ……. Usia 6 tahun


Berkualitas, mahal, tidak merataBerkualitas, mahal, tidak merata


Berkualitas, murah, dan meratabbiMBA‐AIUEO


Roadmap Pembentukan Karakter Minat Belajard S Thi kdan Systems Thinker

PAUD

SDSTKIP

SMPSMA


Learning disabilities?Learning disabilities?

Systems thinking

Soft and Hard Causal Maps

SSM System d i

Maps

NUMBER M h dSSM dynamics Method


Ch




Changes:systematically

desirable, culturally feasible

Comparison of models and real world

Stream of Cultural Enquiry: Analysis One, Two, Three One, Two, Three

(Rich Picture)Real world


Root definition of relevant purposeful activity

Conceptual models of the systems (holons)

named in the rootp p ysystems

named in the root definition


TERIMA KASIHTERIMA KASIH

100


SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY · PDF file4/9/2010 · an application of soft systemsan...

Documents

Transcript of SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY · PDF file4/9/2010 · an application of soft systemsan...