TM 9-2320-279-24P-2 9-2320-279-34P-1, TM 9-2320-279-34P2 ...
Sociology 279: Institutional Theories: Cultural / Phenomenological Approaches Class 1: Introduction...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Sociology 279: Institutional Theories: Cultural / Phenomenological Approaches Class 1: Introduction...
Sociology 279: Institutional Theories: Cultural /
Phenomenological Approaches
Class 1: Introduction
Copyright © 2011 by Evan Schofer
Agenda
• 1. Review syllabus
• 2. Introduce course topic: • Institutions… • Types of institutionalisms• Why cultural/phenomenological institutionalism?
• 3. Explore some of the intellectual foundations of cultural/phenomenological institutionalism
• Specifically, classic contributions from social psychology
Syllabus / Course Info
• All assignments, readings, and handouts are available online– Course website:
• http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~schofer/2011Soc279IT/home279IT.htm
– Course readings via webfiles:• https://webfiles.uci.edu/schofer/classes/2011soc219IT/• UCI ID & password required
• Sign up for reading “mini-reports” today• Hand out sheet…
Background: Institutional Theories
• The 1980s saw the rise/revival of institutional scholarship in economics, political science, sociology, and other fields
• Reactions (variously) to:• 1. Functionalism – Parsons; plus “lay functionalism”
which crops up even today• 2. Materialism – ‘interest-based’ explanations• 3. Rationalism / Realism / Microeconomics –
Emphasis on de-contextualized rational actors.
Institutional Theories
• “New” Institutionalisms took many forms:
• 1. New institutional economics• Moving beyond pure rational actors in a vacuum… • The world is not made up entirely of markets…
– Economic actors create organizations (firms, states)– Actors function within institutional frameworks (laws, etc)
– Questions:• Under what conditions to actors form organizations &
institutions?• How do institutions shape/channel economic behavior?
Institutional Theories
• 2. Institutionalism in International Relations: “International Regimes”
• Prior theory (“neo-realism”) characterized states as rational actors in an anarchy (Waltz)
• But, states cooperate via treaties, organizations (e.g., the WTO)
• Again: What leads to cooperation/coordination? How do these “regimes” shape state behavior?
Institutional Theories
• 3. “Bringing the State Back In”… institutions in political sociology
• The 1960s saw lots of research on voting behavior and pluralism/interest group representation…
– Politics = aggregation of individual/group interests
• Skocpol and others reasserted the importance of the state (i.e., governing institutions, policies, law) in channeling & shaping politics.
• Also: attention to history, “path dependence”– The ways a particular policy gets implemented channels
subsequent action, possibilities– Aka “historical institutionalism”
Institutional Theories
• 4. Institutionalism in organization research– 1960s scholarship emphasized the rational &
functional features of organizations• Or, brought in context in a limited manner (“old
institutionalism”) – e.g., politics / vested interests• New institutionalism emphasized embeddedness of
organizations within a wider political, legal, cultural context
Institutional Theories
• Common theme of “institutionalisms”:• Greater attention to context within which social actors
are embedded…
– Key differences:• What kind of context?• What kind of actors? • What kind of action?
Kinds of Context
• (Fragile) agreements that rational/interested actors enter into
• Economic actors may form a corporation to reduce transaction costs
• Countries may enter into a treaty to improve security
• Path-dependent / emergent features of history (arbitary)
• Ex: Skocpol’s work on social policy– The way things developed in the past shape future
possibilities
• Ex: QWERTY keyboard
Kinds of Actors / Action
• Culture / ideology / “social order” that influences actors – or even “constitutes” them
• Key issue: Actors aren’t the starting point… – Interests, preferences, perhaps even identities = shaped by
social context
• Ex: The phenomenological tradition– We are born into a world in which most social realities are
already defined for us… – We “enact” rules of our world…
• Others:• Powell: (emergent) culture & networks• Etc., etc.
Kinds of Actors
• Key distinction in modern sociological theories: Conceptions of actors/action– At one extreme: rational, interested actors
– ex: microeconomics, rational choice theory
– At the other extreme: “stage” actors that enact roles in society
– Ex: phenomenological institutionalism
– Various compromise positions• Ex: Bourdieu – habitus, field, etc.
Why Phenomenology?
• Why focus on cultural/phenomenological institutionalism?– Sociology continues to be dominated by theories
that privilege actors & interests; & functionalism• In large part because wider culture seeps into
sociological thinking
– Yet, cultural/phenomenological institutionalism has been empirically very fruitful
• It predicts things that others haven’t… sees things that are in our “blind spots”
• In sum: It is a powerful but very non-intuitive way of thinking…. Worth learning.
What is Phenomenology?
• Phenomenology in philosophy (Husserl): study of subjective experience
• Phenomenology in sociology (Schutz, Garfinkel):
• Examination of the subjective or “lived world” of everyday life
– Further elaborations in 1960’s, 70’s:• Focus on “taken-for-granted” features of reality• Attention to the socially/culturally constructed reality
that we inhabit
What is phenomenological institutionalism?
• Ethnomethodology: a phenomenological tradition that focuses on how “reality” emerges from direct interaction
• Related tradition: symbolic interaction
• Phenomenological institutionalism (aka cultural institutionalism)
• Similar in that it focuses on socially constructed realities…
– But it doesn’t just look at immediate social interaction…
• Instead, it looks at the broader culture and institutions of society.
2X2 Table: Types of Theories
• Main typology:– Realist vs. Phenomenological– Micro vs. Macro
• Also: sub-types of realist• Functional, Economic, Political
Readings
– Amenta, Edwin and Kelly M. Ramsey. 2010. “Institutional Theory.”• A review of various institutionalisms
– Jepperson, Ronald L. 1991. “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism.” Pp. 143-163 in Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio (eds.). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Addresses foundational issues: what is an institution. Read carefully.
– Meyer, John W. 2008. “Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations.” In The Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ed. by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin-Andersson, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007. A review paper. Read carefully.
Readings
• Recommended readings:• *March, James G. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational
Factors in Political Life.” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, No. 3 (Sep., 1984), pp. 734-749
• Another overview of many institutionalisms• *Kathleen Thelen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative
Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science. 2: 369-404.• Example of ‘historical institutionalism.
• *Williamson, O. 1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach.” American Journal of Sociology, 87:.
• Example of economic institutionalism• *North, Douglass and B. Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and
Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England.” The Journal of Economic History, 4:803-32.
• Example of economic institutionalism.
Discussion & Break
• Questions?
Foundations: Social Psychology
• Cultural/Phenomenological institutionalisms = a product of many intellectual currents
• Cognitive Social Psychology: provided key insights about the extent to which humans:
• 1. Are shaped by social context• 2. Depart from standard “rational actor” assumptions
– Therefore, the tradition provides an important basis for thinking about actors as “socially constructed”.
Group Discussion
• Task: Take 10 minutes to read handouts: Foundational ideas from social psychology
– Then we’ll have an open group discussion
• Sherif• Asch• Milgram• Zimbardo
– Issues:• Importance of context / situation• Dynamics of conformity• Action as rule-following culture as scripts, models.