Socially Just Adaptation to Climate Change Rachel Brisley, JBA Consulting
description
Transcript of Socially Just Adaptation to Climate Change Rachel Brisley, JBA Consulting
Socially Just Adaptation to Climate ChangeRachel Brisley, JBA ConsultingClimate Justice: Local Impacts and Actions - CLASP
Salvation Army Centre, Preston
16 October 2012
Who’s Who?
• Report was commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation
• Authored by SQW, working with Professor Jouni Paavola
• Findings presented by Rachel Brisley, JBA Consulting (previously SQW)
• Study directed by Jean Welstead, SLR Consulting (previously SQW)
Structure of the presentation
• Introduction to the study
• What is socially just adaptation?
• Policy drivers
• Local authority progress
• Case study lessons
• Conclusions & recommendations
Introduction to the study
• Objectives
– Explore existing approaches to local adaptation to climate change impacts & how these take account of social justice
– Support the development of just local responses to climate change by making recommendations for policy & practice
• Methodology
– Theoretical review of social justice in relation to adaptation
– Survey of local authorities to assess progress with just adaptation
– 3 case studies - Highlands, Islington, York
– Broader review of adaptation practice elsewhere, including the use of adaptation tools
What is socially just adaptation?
• Adaptation means changing our behaviour to respond to both the projected and current impacts of climate change
• Need to understand who is vulnerable (to climate change impacts) & how their needs will be met
• Social issues related to adaptation are diverse & contextually specific
• Procedural justice
– empowering communities to become involved in decision-making
• Distributive justice
– distribution of income, assets & opportunities
Just adaptation principles
1) Build in current & future climate change impacts
2) Understand factors that contribute to vulnerability
3) Identify distribution of vulnerability – not a static state
4) Involve those communities most likely to be affected
5) Understand impacts & target activities
6) Develop a full range of responses
7) Be aware of trade-offs
8) Assess all adaptation options to select optimal choice
Policy drivers
• UK Government – climate change adaptation is a high priority but expects activity to be driven locally
– Challenging in climate of public sector funding cuts
• Not just a local authority responsibility
– Environment Agency, SEPA, NIEA, Single Body
– NHS/Public Health bodies, transport providers & private sector
– Emergency services, housing associations & third sector
• Most policies refer to social justice implications but . . .
– Narrow interpretation – focus on spatial vulnerability & health
– Social vulnerability generally not taken into account & procedural justice not investigated
Local authority review & findings
• Review undertaken (spring 2011)– NI 188 data, reviewed plans at Level 2 or 3 (2009/10), comparison
with LGG Survey (2010)
• Findings
– 36 completed plans
– Significant variety – content, detail & progress
– Research activities dominated
– Lots of action focused on drainage & water management
– Achievement of Level 3 status was low
Local authority review & findings (cont.)
• Power to respond in number of ways including housing, planning & building control
• 2/3 of plans considered physical vulnerability
• Impacts upon different groups of residents not differentiated
• Refit of social housing stock included
• Around 25% considered equality & impacts of adaptation/ mal-adaptation
• LAs keen to embed socially just climate change adaptation, but current constraints mean it is difficult to prioritise
Recent context
Green Alliance Report (Nov 2011)
– 65% of LAs – climate change less of a priority than previously
Potential to increase priority locally
– CCRA, NAP, Local Nature Partnerships, Localism, neighbourhood planning, transfer of public health to LAs, economic arguments
Just adaptation
priority
Climate change adaptation priority
Climate change priority
Case studies – Highland, Islington, York: summary findings
• Need for socially just adaptation accepted & welcomed
• Building adaptive capacity evident in corporate plans & strategies, but . . .
– Driven by climate change officers, less evidence in other services
• Just adaptation best achieved through responses targeted at & developed with vulnerable communities
• Technical, GIS solutions useful for mapping vulnerability
– Care needs to be taken re: blight & data protection
• National priority for climate change adaptation not reflected at local level
– But action needs to be taken locally - consider language, economic arguments & role of others – not sole responsibility of LAs
Highland
• Adaptation Plan refers to differential impacts, vulnerability, equality/equity & community engagement
• Gairloch Community Adaptation Plan
• HC community workshops highlighted a number of actions for voluntary organisations working with vulnerable groups:
– to work with emergency services, not just for service provision, but also for providing clear information on what to do in an emergency
– to regularly review who in the community could be vulnerable to extreme weather
– care home managers to consider the location of their sites and evacuation procedures
Islington
• Impact that increased temperature could have on health has been identified as a particular issue for Islington
• Cross-departmental Adaptation Board
• Cross-Borough Adaptation Group
• Risk assessment of the Adaptation Strategy
• Action Plan
• Equalities Impact Assessment of the Adaptation Strategy
• Good Practice Guides
• Cool-It presentations
Islington – adapting to high temperatures & reduced rainfall
The Rainsponge Project: fitting out the paved courtyard of a community centre has reduced seasonal flooding and encouraged centre users to use the outdoor space
Rainwater garden
York
• Corporate commitment to climate change adaptation
– Climate change plan refresh (2013) will have greater focus on social justice & needs of vulnerable communities
• Local Plan Core Strategy
– supportive policies
• First Call 50+ & Hotspots campaign
– referral to support services for vulnerable people
• Adaptation planning in collaboration with local travellers
• Specific adaptation examples
– Temporary bridge to social housing
– Raised sockets in care homes
Conclusions
• Socially just adaptation is complex & requires working with multiple partners
• Greater profile nationally than locally
• Climate change impacts largely accepted, but action focused on emergency responses
• Social justice taken into account to a degree, but focuses on spatial vulnerability & health
• More needs to be done - share good practice, encourage commitment & action, work with communities & enable effective delivery
• Opportunities exist to progress socially just adaptation
• Trade-offs between costs & benefits not highlighted - central to embedding just adaptation NAP!
Recommendations
Education & communication including use of language, understanding the agenda, opportunities & negative impacts
Mainstreaming socially just adaptation across Government, national organisations, local authorities & other local bodies
Collaborative working at local & national levels but with a clear definition of roles & responsibilities
Involvement of vulnerable communities in the development & delivery of climate change adaptation to embed social justice
Sharing knowledge & best practice to address varied standards of adaptation across the UK & engender collective improvement