Social Monitoring Report...DPRD : Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah – Local Legislative EBTKE :...

Social Monitoring Report

Project Number: 42916-014

January 2020

Sarulla Geothermal Power Generation Project (Republic of Indonesia)

Prepared by Sarulla Operations Limited for the Asian Development Bank

The Social Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Resettlement Completion Report

Sarulla Geothermal Field and Power Plant

330 MW Capacity

North Tapanuli Regency

North Sumatera Province

Indonesia

Prepared by:

SARULLA OPERATIONS Ltd

December 2019

1

Table of Contents

ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................... 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 8

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 12

1.1. OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................... 13

1.2. RESOURCES ....................................................................................................... 13

1.3. METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................. 14

1.4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................... 15

1.4.1. National Regulations ...................................................................................... 15

1.4.2. International Standards .................................................................................. 16

1.5. STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .......................................................................... 17

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 19

2.1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 19

2.2. PROJECT LAND REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................... 20

2.3. PROJECT LAND ACQUISITION STATUS ............................................................ 21

2.4. LAND ACQUISITION FOR POWER PLANT ......................................................... 22

2.5. LAND ACQUISITION FOR TRANSMISSION LINE ............................................... 24

3. RESETTLEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION .................................................... 26

3.1. LAND SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................. 26

3.2. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ........................................................................................ 26

3.3. AFFECTED PEOPLE ............................................................................................ 28

3.4. VALUE OF COMPENSATION .............................................................................. 29

3.5. CUT-OFF DATE ................................................................................................... 30

3.6. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN .......................................... 30

4. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ................................ 31

4.1. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE ..................................... 32

4.2. VULNERABLE GROUPS AND LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION ............................. 36

4.3. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY .......................................................................... 47

4.4. INTEGRATED SOCIAL PROGRAM ..................................................................... 49

4.5. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGAMENT ......................................................................... 61

4.5.1. Identification of Stakeholders ......................................................................... 61

4.5.2. Stakeholder Consultation ............................................................................... 61

4.5.3. Women Participation ...................................................................................... 62

4.6. DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION ....................................................................... 64

4.7. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ................................................................ 65

5. MONITORING PROCESS ................................................................................... 68

5.1. INTERNAL MONITORING .................................................................................... 68

5.2. EXTERNAL MONITORING ................................................................................... 68

2

6. ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION ................................................................... 74

7. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION ............................................................. 80

3

List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of land acquired for Project facilities in SIL & NIL ................................... 23

Table 2 Summary of Land Acquired for 150 kV Transmission Line ..................................... 25

Table 3 Entitlements Matrix ................................................................................................. 27

Table 4 Affected Land Owners ............................................................................................ 29

Table 5 Local Worker Hired in Construction Period 2015 - 2017 ......................................... 32

Table 6 Total Respondents Involved in USU Social Survey ................................................ 33

Table 7 Minimum wage in North Tapanuli Regency and inflation rate in 2014 -2017 ........... 34

Table 8 Income comparison of 17 most vulnerable land owners based on 2014-2017 inflation

........................................................................................................................................... 34

Table 9 BPS Standard of Living Indicators .......................................................................... 38

Table 10 Assistance Program for the 17 Most Vulnerable Households ............................... 41

Table 11 Verification Matrix for BPS Standard of Living of the 17 Most Vulnerable Group .. 46

Table 12 Respondents’ Employment Status ........................................................................ 48

Table 13 Summary of ISP implementation in 2015 – 2018 .................................................. 51

Table 14 Farmers' groups and type of activities ................................................................. 57

Table 15 Agricultural and livelihood restoration activities with number of land owners and non-

land owners ........................................................................................................................ 58

Table 16 Infrastructure Improvement Program (2015-2018) ................................................ 60

Table 17 Community Participation in Village Meeting 2015 – 2018 ..................................... 62

Table 18 ADB Environmental & Social Team Site Visit in 2015 -2019 ................................. 70

Table 19 SOL RP/LRP Commitments Evaluation Status ..................................................... 80

Table 20 Recommended Actions for Improvement .............................................................. 83

4

List of Figures

Figure 1 Sarulla Project Location ........................................................................................ 20

Figure 2 SOL land acquisition process ................................................................................ 26

Figure 3 Workers employed by SOL and its contractors ...................................................... 47

Figure 4 Employment Position for Locals ............................................................................ 47

Figure 5 Unskilled workers by gender (2014-2018) ............................................................. 48

Figure 6 Program Planning Process .................................................................................... 50

Figure 7 Fish farming initial harvest in Pardamean Nainggolan village ................................ 58

Figure 8 Clean water piping in Lumban Jaean village, 2016................................................ 60

Figure 9 Female Participation in LRP Implementation ......................................................... 63

Figure 10 Female Participation in LRP (Percentage)........................................................... 64

Figure 11 SOL Grievance Redress Mechanism .................................................................. 66

Figure 12 SOL Grievance Log 2015 – 2018 ........................................................................ 67

5

Appendices

Appendix A. Land acquisition process in photographs ........................................................ 86

Appendix B. Budget and Total spending for T-line, WJP 1, Road 5 & NIL E-1 .................... 88

Appendix C. ISP implementation 2015-2016 ....................................................................... 89

Appendix D. ISP implementation 2016-2018 ....................................................................... 90

Appendix E. Summary of consultation/socialization on land acquisition (2015 – 2018) ....... 95

Appendix F. Communication Media used by SOL .............................................................. 97

Appendix G. Consultation and participation meeting on RP and LRP ................................ 100

Appendix H. Sample Report to External Parties ................................................................ 103

Appendix I. Spot checks in 2015-2018 .............................................................................. 104

6

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB : Asian Development Bank

BPN : Badan Pertanahan Negara - National Land Agency

BPS : Badan Pusat Statistik – Central Bureau of Statistic

CAP : Corrective Action Plan

COI : Corridor of Impact

CSR : Corporate Social Responsibility

DOA : Deed of Assignment

DPRD : Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah – Local Legislative

EBTKE : Energi Baru Terbarukan dan Konservasi Energi – Renewable Energy and

Energy Conservation

ER : External Relation

ESC : Energy Sales Contract

ESDM : Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral – Energy and Mineral Resources

EPFI : Equator Principles Financing Institution

ERM : Environmental Resources Management

FGD : Focus Group Discussion

ha : Hectare

IEC : Information Education Consultation

IFC : International Finance Corporation

IP : Indigenous Peoples

IPP : Indigenous Peoples Plan

ISP : Integrated Social Program

JBIC : Japan Bank for International Cooperation

JOC : Joint Operation Contract

km : Kilometre

kV : Kilo Volt

LO : Land owner

LRP : Livelihood Restoration Program

m : Metre

m2 : Square meter

MW : Mega Watt

NGO : Non-Government Organization

7

NIL : Namora I Langit

PAH : Project Affected Household

PAP : Project Affected People

PAV : Project Affected Village

Pemda : Pemerintah Daerah – Local Authority

PGE : PT Pertamina Geothermal Energy

PKK : Pembinaan Kesejahteraan Keluarga – Family Welfare Empowerment

PLN : PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara – State-owned Electricity Enterprise

Posyandu : Pos Pelayanan Terpadu (Integrated Health service Post)

PR : Presidential Regulation

PRA : Participatory Rural Appraisal

PS : Performance Standard

RCA : Resettlement Completion Audit

RCR : Resettlement Completion Report

RoW : Right of Way

RP : Resettlement Plan

SIL : Silangkitang

SOL : Sarulla Operations Ltd

SPS : Safeguard Policy Statement

SS : Social Survey

SSCAR : Social Safeguard Compliance Audit Report

SSMR : Safeguard and Social Monitoring Report

T/L : Transmission Line

UNSG : UNOCAL North Sumatera Geothermal

USU : Universitas Sumatera Utara - North Sumatera University

WJP : West JEC Production Well

WJR : West JEC Re-injection Well

8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sarulla Operations Ltd (SOL) developed a geothermal field and power plant at 330 MW

capacity in Pahae Jae and Pahae Julu Districts, North Tapanuli Regency, North Sumatera

Province. The Project is funded by Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), Asian

Development Bank (ADB) and a group of Equator Principles Financing Institutions (EPFIs).

SOL is committed to implement the Project in compliance with Indonesian regulations and

lenders’ requirements on environmental, social and health policies. As part of maintaining the

compliance to applicable standards, SOL established this Resettlement Completion Report

(RCR).

The RCR focuses on capturing the overall process and outcome of land acquisition activities

undertaken by the Project between 2014 and 2018; and presents the implementation of the

Resettlement Plan (RP) and the Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP) as part of Integrated

Social Program (ISP) embedded in Indigenous Peoples Plan (IPP).

Along the Project development, there are two major milestones of land acquisition process:

Prior land acquisition by UNOCAL in 1994-1995 was reported in Social Safeguard

Compliance Audit Report (SSCAR) 2014. The document was submitted to and

approved by ADB. No outstanding issues related to the UNOCAL land acquisition that

require corrective actions.

Land acquisition completed by SOL was largely settled in October 2013. Payment and

compensation for land and plants were completely paid.

The land acquisition data (2012 – 2018) records 268 land owners impacted by Transmission

Lines (T/L) facilities and 21 owners affected by the development of Access Road 5 and West

JEC Production Well (WJP) 1N. The actual land acquired for Project facilities was 127.38 ha.

All payment for lands and plants were completed.

The University of North Sumatra (USU) and the consulting firm Environment Resources

management (ERM) reported that land acquisition has no major adverse impact to land

owners’ livelihood. Most of land owners were able to continue their farming activities as their

major source of livelihood. No physical displacement was taken place, but economic

displacement was observed. This triggered SOL to develop an LRP, which was prepared in

the year 2014.

As part of the LRP implementation, SOL established ISP to focus on five main social concerns

covering agricultural/livelihood, education, health, culture, art and religion, and infrastructure.

The social concerns were selected based on social assessment, mapping and consultation

conducted with the local indigenous communities of the affected villages in 2014. The ISP

targets the most vulnerable beneficiaries including land owners, non-land owners, women,

children, elderly people and poor families.

SOL introduces multiple programs and initiatives to ensure the main social concerns are

equally covered, well monitored and evaluated.

Based on the RP/LRP implementation and management of ISP, SOL confirmed that:

Land acquisition process for power plant facilities and T/L were completed.

9

Payment of compensation for lost assets were properly settled and completely paid.

Completion of resettlement entitlements and livelihood restoration were adequately

described.

No outstanding claims, disputes or grievances related to RP/LRP implementation are

left unattended and unresolved.

No physical displacement was undertaken. Instead, SOL developed an LRP following

the economic displacement and carefully identified the most vulnerable group.

Restoration of social networks and evidence of integration with the host communities

are adequately presented in the IPP/ISP.

Land acquisition process was conducted through Location Permit mechanism via

direct negotiation and an agreed price with land owners. The entire process of land

acquisition was conducted by SOL while the local government’s role was to facilitate

and to monitor the process. With regards to disclosure of information, SOL followed

the requirements as defined in the IPP.

The internal monitoring is conducted intensively by SOL through multiple monitoring

systems and intrinsically linked to the progress of ISP. The monitoring results also

reported to concerned parties on a regular basis.

The external monitoring was conducted by USU in 2017 resulting in Social Survey

report. Referring to ADB, a Resettlement Completion Audit (RCA) to be conducted

following the receipt of this RCR. The audit schedule will be defined by ADB.

SOL also observed some opportunities for improvement to ensure continuation and

sustainable RP/LRP implementation related to:

The most vulnerable group: SOL is considering to further evaluate 5 out of 12 people

who are not employed by or do not work for SOL to be included in the ISP/LRP

program.

The poor land owners (based on USU Social Survey): SOL is also considering to

further evaluate 11 out of 163 land owners who are considered poor based on income.

Based on the evaluation result, it will be determined whether they will be included in

the ISP/LRP program for the most vulnerable group and whether the assessment on

the type of program most suitable to their condition will be conducted.

SOL commitments and conclusion of the RP/LRP evaluation status are shown in below table.

No. Commitments Details of Commitments Achievement

Rating Remarks (Gaps identified)

1 Compensation &

Benefits

o Replacement cost paid;

o Lost assets replaced;

o Payment to be done prior to

manifestation of impact;

o Shifting allowance/other benefits

paid.

√ Fully Met

Compensation amount

adequate and at

replacement value, and

payment was done prior to

the manifestation of impact.

All required payment

completed. No outstanding

issues

10



2 Livelihood/Income

Restoration

o Income restored to 100% of

immediate pre-Project level;

o Secure employment for impacted

persons;

o Training/Skill Building;

o Loans/Micro-credits;

o Help with small enterprise

development;

√ Fully Met

Income of affected people

has been restored. LRP

program implemented. To

sustain the program

particularly the income

restoration, SOL is

considering including the

remaining most vulnerable

group and poor land owners

(based on USU SS) in the

mid-term and long-term ISP

Programs. No outstanding

issues.

3 Assets

o Legal titles issued for houses;

o Other assets like cowsheds,

house furniture, farm equipment’s

(as relevant) given to eligible

families;

√ Fully Met

No physical displacement

taken place; so, no need for

issuing a legal title for

houses. Compensation

payment with total amount of

IDR ± 400,020,300 for

temporary structures were


issues

3

Resettlement Site

and Social

Infrastructure

o Improved Housing;

o All common Infrastructure &

amenities in place;

o Reasonable integration with host

community.

√ Fully Met

No new resettlement site

created; so, no need for

improved housing. ISP well

implemented in close

consultation with host

communities. No outstanding

issues

4 Grievance

Mechanism

o Functional GM system

implemented;

o Online tracking system for

grievances available.

√ Fully Met

Grievance Redress

Mechanism established and

was well functioned. No

outstanding grievances

related to RP/LRP. No

outstanding issues

5 Monitoring &

Documentation

o Established monitoring

mechanism in place and duly

implemented;

o Results on internal as well as

external monitoring disclosed

o Documentation unit established.

√ Fully Met

Internal monitoring

conducted intensively (ref.

Section 5.1). As part of

regular monitoring,

implementation of RP/LRP

was reported in the SSMRs

2015-2018, which were

disclosed on the web.

External monitoring was

conducted by USU. This

RCR will be disclosed on

11



the web. An RCA is

expected following the

receipt of the RCR. No

outstanding issues found

6 Institutional

Support

o Establish Resettlement

Implementation Unit to

support/facilitate R&R;

o Provide adequate infrastructure

and resources to the unit;

√ Fully Met

A Resettlement Unit was

established, supported by

the ER Team and CSR

Team. Budget for

institutional support was

provided adequately.

IPP/ISP program well

implemented and monitored.

No outstanding issues

7 RP/LRP Budget

o Set aside the budget as

estimated in the RP/LRP;

o Provision for additional budget to

complete any pending actions

√ Fully Met

RP/LRP budget allocated as

part of ISP in 2015-2019 with

total amount of ± IDR

6,900,000,000. Total

spending is monitored,

evaluated and reported (ref.

Appendix B), No outstanding

issues

12

1. INTRODUCTION

SOL or “Sarulla Operations Limited” is the operation company established by the

Consortium of Itochu Corporation, Kyushu Electric Power Co., Inc., Ormat International,

Inc. and PT. Medco Energi International Tbk. SOL developed a geothermal field and

power plant at 330 MW capacity in Pahae Jae and Pahae Julu Districts, North Tapanuli

Regency, North Sumatera Province.

In the development, the Consortium and SOL signed a Deed of Assignment (DOA) with

PT. Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) Persero; a Joint Operation Contract (JOC) with PT.

Pertamina Geothermal Energy (PGE); and an ESC (Energy Sales Contract) with

Pertamina Geothermal Energy - and PT. PLN. The Project is funded by Japan Bank for

International Cooperation (JBIC), Asian Development Bank (ADB) and a group of Equator

Principles Financing Institutions (EPFIs).

The Project required land for power plant siting and transmission land to include the

following allocation:

Power Plant: power generation facilities, geothermal wells with relevant equipment,

access roads, steam and brine pipelines, quarry areas, temporary storage and

temporary worker camps (during construction phase)

Transmission Line: tower footprints, RoW (Right of Way) and restricted use of land

within the T/L corridor of impact


Land acquisition by UNOCAL

UNOCAL conducted a land acquisition process between 1994 and 1995 with total land

acquired ± 422,922 m2 (42,2 ha) within the scope of SOL project area. The lands

belong to PT PGE whereby SOL is leasing the land for the Project activities over the

next 30 years.

Land acquisition by SOL

Land acquisition process carried out by SOL for the additional land required for the

project was in the period of 2012 -2018 with total width of land acquired ± 1,273,872 m2 (127 ha).

The project is required to comply with JBIC, ADB and EPFIs applicable environmental,

social and health policies, developed for managing the environmental and social risks

associated with project finance. As part of the requirements for ADB Safeguard Policy

Statement 2009 on Involuntary Resettlement, SOL has prepared land

acquisition/resettlement plan (RP) in 2014 covering the remaining land needed for project

facilities in NIL and transmission line.

Upon the completion of 127 ha land acquisition process as elaborated in the RP, SOL is

obliged to prepare resettlement completion report (RCR) as stated in the RP document.

The resettlement completion report captures the overall process and outcome of land

acquisition activities undertaken and as planned in the RP to determine whether the

Resettlement Plan (RP)/Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP) have been properly

13

conceived and executed and have succeeded in restoring or improving of the livelihoods

of persons physically or economically displaced by the project.

1.1. OBJECTIVES

RP draft report was prepared and submitted to ADB in 2014. Several revisions processes

were done to accommodate inputs and updates on the plan. Final report was approved in

February 2015 and posted on ABD website. To assess the implementation of land

acquisition against the RP document and as part of maintaining the compliance to

applicable standards, in particularly the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) on

involuntary resettlement, SOL established this Resettlement Completion Report (RCR).

The RCR objectives are:

to determine whether the Resettlement Plan (RP) or Livelihood Restoration

Program (LRP) is properly conceived and executed

to assess whether RP/LRP is succeeded in restoring or improving the livelihood of

person physically or economically displaced by the Project

to report the LRP implementation status for land owners identified both in Social

Safeguard Compliance Audit Report (SSCAR) and RP through Integrated Social

Program (ISP)

The RCR focuses on capturing the overall process and outcome of land acquisition

activities undertaken by the Project between 2014 and 2018. This report also presents the

program implemented by SOL regarding the Resettlement Plan (RP) and the Livelihood

Restoration Program (LRP) as part of Integrated Social Program (ISP) embedded in

Indigenous People Plan (IPP).

The land acquisition process conducted before 2014 and the purchased of land for power

plant area are discussed in SSCAR document of the year 2014. This SSCAR was

submitted to and approved by ADB. There were no outstanding issues related to the pre-

2014 land acquisition process.

1.2. RESOURCES

The RCR is developed based on the implementation of multiple programs related to RP

and LRP. There were nine people in External Relation (ER) Team and three people in

CSR team in 20142018 who majorly contributed to this RCR through their daily activities

report in approaching the communities, monitoring and evaluating the RP and LRP

program. All those inputs were analysed, verified and formulated in this RCR by an

independent consultant, Miss Adis Noer Rachmi Prima Dewi with consultation and

intensive discussion with SOL’s team:

Ms. Melva Samosir- CSR and External Relation Manager, six years with SOL

Ms. Fella Situmorang- CSR Supervisor, six months with SOL

14

1.3. METHODOLOGY

To maintain compliance with ADB requirements and for ease of review, SOL uses the ADB

Preliminary Guidance for RP/LRP Completion Report (Draft, 21 February 2018) as

reference. The report structure is developed in such a way to ensure that the critical points

defined in the guideline are discussed and well presented.

The methodology applied in developing this report include:

a. Desktop review

Relevant documents of land acquisition process including the compensation

mechanism, grievance mechanism and public consultation conducted were internally

reviewed in alignment with relevant international standards and national regulations.

Reference documents for this RCR are taken from the reports, records and other

materials related to RP, LRP and SOL socio-economic program. The main sources

include (but not limited to) the following documents:

Social Safeguard Compliance Audit Report (SSCAR) - The report was created in

2013 and was approved in February 2015.

The report aimed to explain the successes and challenges of the ± 48 ha land

acquisition previously done by UNOCAL. The report includes the social

components of the IPP such as progress on land acquisition, grievances related to

RP/LRP and SSCAR close out actions.

Resettlement Plan (RP) - Developed in 2014 and approved in 2015.

RP describes the land acquisition process for approximately 22 ha of land mainly

for the transmission line between SIL and NIL and additional acquisition for Access

Road 5 and WJP 1N.

Indigenous Peoples Plan (IPP) – Developed in 2013, updated and approved in

2015.

The document aimed to evaluate and assess the potential project impacts on the

Indigenous Peoples (IP) living in the surrounding Project area and affected villages

based on the project data and socio-economic information and Integrated Social

Program activities that sets out the social mitigation measures and community

development required for implementation by the project.

Supplementary Land Acquisition Plan (NIL-E1) – Developed in August 2016 and

approved in November 2016.

This document elaborated land acquisition plan for additional well pad, NIL -E1 and

its supporting facilities with total ± 5 ha of land which was required for the project

due to the insufficient capacity of proposed re-injection wells on the existing well

pads in 2016.

Safeguard and Social Monitoring Report (SSMR) – submitted every semester for

the period of 2015 – 2018

15

SSMR reports the implementation of project environmental and social program

activities which included the progress and completion of land acquisition process

every semester. For the period of 2015-2018, there are 8 (eight) reports submitted

to the lenders.

Integrated Social Program (ISP) report - presented during the site visit conducted

by ADB for the period of 2015-1st semester of 2019

SOL reports the ISP monitoring to ADB since the construction phase in 2015. The

program is developed based on mutual efforts and partnership: SOL initiatives and

communities proposed inputs to avoid duplication or overlapping with program

development initiated by local government. Communities’ contribution increases

the ownership of the program and sustains the implementation.

The program implementation addresses five main community concerns related to

agricultural/livelihood, education, health, culture, art and religion, and

infrastructure. The ISP also includes program focusing on most vulnerable group

as part of the LRP implementation. The ISP implementation is monitored through

community consultation.

There are 7 (seven) reports presented during the period of 2015- 1st semester of

2019. The report discussed the updates on the implementation of SOL’s ISP for

the communities since 2015 focussing on (i) agricultural/livelihood, (ii) education,

(iii) health, (iv) culture, art and religion, (v) infrastructure.

b. Social survey

SOL engaged North Sumatera University (USU) to conduct a Social Survey (SS) in

December 2017 – January 2018. The survey aimed to review and examine the SOL

socio-economic programs implementation at the affected communities including the

affected land owners.

c. Stakeholders engagement and land owners’ interview

SOL External Relations Team actively engages with the affected communities, in

particularly to maintain communication, foster better relations and ensure that any

community grievances are addressed. In doing their daily activities, ER Team builds

up dialogues and collects information, comments and inputs from the communities.

This type of information is formulated and included in this report.

d. Project involvement

SOL ER Team has considerable Project experience and involvement in Sarulla

Development (2-11 years). Their familiarity to the Project and intense exposure to

communities are taken into account as existing strengths to be utilized in preparing the

RCR.

1.4. LEGAL FRAMEWORK

1.4.1. National Regulations

The land acquisition related regulations are as follow:

16

Head of National Land Agency Regulation No. 2 of 1999 regarding Land

procurement by private business entity. This regulation sets out the location permit

(Izin Lokasi) procedure for private business entities in acquiring land.

Presidential Regulation No. 36 of 2005 is the legal basis for implementation of land

acquisition through the location designation (Penetapan Lokasi) mechanism.

Penetapan Lokasi regulates the process of land procurement for development in

the public’s interest (which means Projects undertaken and initiated by

governmental institutions or entities using the state or local government budget).

1.4.2. International Standards

The applicable international standards in land acquisition process are:

ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009 governs the environmental and social

safeguards of ADB’s operations and articulates the safeguard policy principles for

three key safeguard areas:

- Environmental safeguards (SPS, Appendix 1);

- Involuntary resettlement safeguards (SPS, Appendix 2); and

- Indigenous Peoples safeguards (SPS, Appendix 3).

The ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 applies to losses due to both to physical

and economic displacement caused by involuntary acquisition of land. The Project

follows and applies the principles embedded in the safeguard policy 2009 for

Involuntary resettlement.

JBIC’s Social Requirements

JBIC’s Guidelines state the following of relevance for consideration for the Project:

- Involuntary resettlement and loss of means of livelihood are to be avoided where

feasible, exploring all viable alternatives. When, after such examination, it is

proved unfeasible, effective measures to minimize impact and to compensate for

losses must be agreed upon with the people who will be affected;

- People to be resettled involuntarily and people whose means of livelihood will be

hindered or lost must be sufficiently compensated and supported by the project

proponents, etc. in a timely manner. Prior compensation, at full replacement cost,

must be provided as much as possible;

- The project proponents must make efforts to enable the people affected by the

project, to improve their standard of living, income opportunities and production

levels, or at least to restore them to pre-project levels; and

- Appropriate participation by the people affected and their communities must be

promoted in planning, implementation and monitoring of involuntary resettlement

plans and measures against the loss of their means of livelihood. In addition,

17

appropriate and accessible grievance mechanisms must be established for the

people affected and their communities.

IFC Performance Standard 5 (PS 5): Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement

- IFC Performance Standard (PS) 5 refers to Land Acquisition and Involuntary

Resettlement. Under PS 5, physical and/or economic displacement resulting from

land-related transactions are defined as resulting from the following transactions:

- Land rights or land use rights acquired through expropriation or other compulsory

procedures in accordance with the legal system of the host country;

- Land rights or land use rights acquired through negotiated settlements with

property owners or those with legal rights to the land if failure to reach settlement

would have resulted in expropriation or other compulsory procedures;

- Project situations where involuntary restrictions on land use and access to natural

resources cause a community or groups within a community to lose access to

resource usage where they have traditional or recognizable usage rights;

- Certain project situations requiring evictions of people occupying land without

formal, traditional, or recognizable usage rights; or

- Restriction on access to land or use of other resources including communal

property and natural resources such as marine and aquatic resources, timber and

non-timber forest products, freshwater, medicinal plants, hunting and gathering

grounds and grazing and cropping areas.

PS 5 states that where project impacts on land, assets, or access to assets become

significantly adverse at any stage of the project IFC advises on the application of the

standard. There is no physical resettlement associated with the Project but land

acquisition due to the Project may result in the economic displacement (loss of access

to resources necessary for income generation or as means of livelihood) of individuals

or communities, including those considered of vulnerable status. The IFC requires the

avoidance of economic displacement or to minimise impacts on individuals or

communities through appropriate measures such as fair compensation and improving

livelihoods and living conditions.

1.5. STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT

This RCR is structured as follows:

Chapter 1: Introduction- overview of Project Sponsors, RCR objectives, methodologies

applied and the legal framework as reference.

Chapter 2: Project Description- background of land acquisition and overall status of land

acquired by SOL.

Chapter 3: RP Implementation- review on the overall RP implementation.

Chapter 4: LRP Implementation- review on the overall LRP implementation.

Chapter 5: Monitoring- description of monitoring conducted by SOL and external parties.

18

Chapter 6: Assessment and evaluation- self-assessment towards the RP/LRP

implementation to fulfil the RCR objectives.

Chapter 7: Conclusion- current status of RP/LRP implementation against ADB SPS

requirements.

19

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1. BACKGROUND

The Project area is located approximately 40 km to the south of Tarutung at the side of

the Trans Sumatera Highway (Tarutung – Sipirok); administratively located in Pahae Jae

and Pahae Julu districts, North Tapanuli Regency, North Sumatera Province.

The Project was initiated by UNOCAL North Sumatera Geothermal (UNSG), after the

Energy Sales Contract (ESC) and Joint Operation Contract (JOC) were signed in 1993.

Extensive exploration activities were conducted to include geo-scientific, geology,

geochemistry and geophysics investigations, and the development of certain infrastructure

such as well pads and access roads. Total land acquired by UNOCAL within the scope of

SOL project area was ± 422,922 m2 (42 ha). Drilling activities were conducted between

1994 and 1998. After receiving the Right to Develop the Project, the Consortium re-

evaluated the Sarulla exploration data to undertake the next strategy for the field

development stage of the Sarulla Contract Area. The new development plan, including

drilling by utilizing reservoir forecast simulation was established in 2011.

The need for additional land for the development conducted by SOL was estimated at ±

1,270,000 m2 (127 ha) as discussed in the RP in 2014. The actual land acquired by the

Project is ± 1,273,872 m2 (127,3 Ha). The development of Sarulla geothermal field covers

the main following activities:

The development of Silangkitang (SIL) field located in Pahae Jae district and

Namora I Langit (NIL) field located in Pahae Julu district;

The construction and operation of 330 MW geothermal power plant, one unit at SIL

and two units at NIL each with a nominal capacity of 110 MW; and

The construction of a combined length of approximately 14 km of 150 kV (high

voltage) overhead transmission line from Silangkitang field (SIL1) and Namora I

Langit field (NIL1) to PLN substation.

The Project location covering both SIL and NIL is shown in Figure 1.

20

Figure 1 Sarulla Project Location

2.2. PROJECT LAND REQUIREMENTS

The power plant locations for both SIL and NIL are located at mixed plantation areas. SIL

is situated approximately 500 metres (m) from the nearest residential area, while NIL is

located at least 1 km from the residential area.

The land acquired for Project components and facilities in SIL was mainly rice paddy fields

while NIL was largely for rubber & cacao plantations, all of which is customarily used or

owned by the families in the villages. The acquired land is known as family land (Tanah

Keluarga) similar to most of the land in the Pahae Jae and Pahae Julu districts. Acquired

21

land that is privately owned by individual families (heritage land) is neither formally

registered nor legally certified by the National Land Agency (BPN) but it is acknowledged

by the surrounding communities by maintaining and confirming the nature sign boundaries.

This refers to customary land which is also acknowledged under the Law in Indonesia

where land is cultivated from generations to generations and customarily inherited to the

family.

Land required for the Project was procured for the following allocation:

Power Plant: power generation facilities, geothermal wells with relevant equipment,

access roads, steam and brine pipelines, quarry areas, temporary storage and

temporary worker camps (during construction phase)

Transmission Line: tower footprints, RoW (Right of Way) and restricted use of land

within the T/L corridor of impact

PLN requirement for a typical 150 kV T/L is that the width of T/L RoW has a corridor of

impact of 18 m (9 m on each side). The minimum clearance to the ground is 12 m from the

main road, 9 m from the normal ground, 5.5 m from any trees.

ESDM (ref. Decree No. 38/2013) stipulates that land owners are not allowed to plant trees

of a certain height nor can they erect structure of a certain height under the TL RoW. In

this regard, SOL determined the corridor of impact (COI) for the T/L. The land under T/L

is not to be purchased, instead an easement fee for the towers is paid.

PLN has acquired land for connecting T/L to the substation after obtaining a location permit

(Izin Lokasi). No further information received from PLN related to land area, land

ownership and land use type of affected land owners.

2.3. PROJECT LAND ACQUISITION STATUS

SOL land acquisition complies with the Head of National Land Agency Regulation No. 2

of 1999. The Project applied the “Izin Lokasi”, or location permit mechanism because the

Project is executed by a Project entity funded by private financing. Under this Izin Lokasi

mechanism, the Project holds no right to expropriate land owners from their land. As such,

land acquisition is done through a direct negotiation to achieve a mutually agreed price

with land owners.

The land procurement process was undertaken in stages as the Project progresses. The

entire process of land acquisition was conducted by SOL while the local government’s role

was to facilitate and to monitor the process.


Prior land acquisition by UNOCAL

UNOCAL conducted a land acquisition process between 1994 and 1995 with total 42

ha of land acquired. The acquired lands belong to PT Pertamina Geothermal Energy

(PGE) from which SOL is leasing the land for the Project activities over the next 30

years. The SSCAR 2014 reports that there were no outstanding issues related to the

UNOCAL land acquisition that require corrective actions.

22

Land acquisition completed by SOL

SSCAR 2014 reports that as of October 2013, SOL has largely completed the land

acquisition process in SIL and NIL areas with compensation payment made to land

owners for land and plants.

SOL uses forestry land and obtained Borrow-Use Permit (Izin Pinjam Pakai) over 295

Ha of land area however SOL only opened and utilize ± 30 Ha of land out the 295 Ha.

SOL also paid land compensation to the land owners as their land located within the

forestry area with customary land status where land ownership for generations passed

down through heritage. Clans and village leaders confirmed the existence of such

customary ownership over the area, including the forestry area.

Few corrective actions were raised following the Social Safeguard Compliance Audit

Report (SSCAR 2014). SSMR Semester 2 2018 reports that there were no outstanding

corrective actions (CA) related to land acquisition.

Monitoring on the implementation of the corrective actions was conducted by SOL team

internally and external parties such as ADB and LESC to ensure that SOL is in adherence

to lenders’ social safeguard policy in land acquisition. This has helped to smoothen the

process of land acquisition.

RP 2015 reported that as of August 2014, there were 262 land owners identified for the

towers, Access Road 5 and WJP 1N (a well pad in NIL). The land acquisition data (2012

– 2018) recorded 268 land owners impacted by T/L facilities and 21 owners affected by

the development of Access Road 5 and WJP 1N. However, as the Project was

progressing, there were changes to the number, from 262 number of landowners to 268

number.

2.4. LAND ACQUISITION FOR POWER PLANT

The RP 2015 reports that a total of 127 ha of land was required for the SIL and NIL.

However as of 2018, the actual land acquired for Project facilities is 127.38 ha. This

difference was due to additional land required for the following facilities:

Additional well pad and supporting facilities in NIL E-1 location in 2016, land was

required due to the insufficient capacity of proposed re-injection wells on the

existing well pads in 2016

Technical solution in some of NIL location (2015 – 2018), land acquired due to

technical solution related to community grievances. The land acquired is not

intended for Project facility, only as part of technical solution to avoid recurring

grievances.

Table 1 presents the actual land acquired by SOL as of 2018.

23

Table 1 Summary of land acquired for Project facilities in SIL & NIL

Project Component Estimated Required Area (m2)

Acquired by

UNOCAL (m2)

Acquired by SOL as of

Dec 2018 (m2)

Total Land Owners (as acquired by

SOL)

Month/Year

SIL

Brine Injection Line

(SIL1 - SIL2) 18,498 - 32,968 43

Feb 2012; Oct

2014; Feb 2016

Brine Injection Line

(SIL1 - SIL3) - - 22,021 30 Nov 2015

Disposal for Power

Plant 71,348 59,008 12,340 1 July 2013

Borrow Area 25,105 3,995 21,110 5 July 2013

Well Pad SIL1 71,348 59,008 12,488 6 July 2013

Power Plant 196,946 131,339 66,433 13 July 2013

SIL2 Expansion &

Access Road 5,311 23,110 24,610 19 Oct 2013

Laydown 1 28,000 - 13,332 10 July 2013

Laydown 2 40,454 20,454 12,795 8 Oct 2013

Drilling Disposal - - 3,771 3 Oct 2013

NIL

Main Access Road

(Road 1 & 1A) 131,711 95,476 35,348 80 Sept 2013

Well Pad NIL 2N &

Access Road 3B 57,231 - 57,231 12 Sept 2013

Disposal & Access

Road 3A 17,605 - 176,050 26 Sept 2013

Borrow Area

(Borrow Pit) 93,923 - 90,819 25 Sept 2013

WJR 1N & Access

Road 6B 66,045 30,532 37,710 23

Sept 2013;

Jan 2014

Power Plant &

Access Road (Road

2, 3)

228,113 - 228,113 25 Sept 2013

Laydown 80,000 - 61,497 13 Oct 2013

WJP & Road 5 &

Additional Land 200,000 - 186,182 21

Oct 2013; Dec

2014; Jan 2015

NIL – E1 - - 50,647 30 Nov 2016

WJR 2N & Access

Road 40,000 - 32,967 19

Oct 2013; Nov

2013

NIL1N & Road 4B - - 76,796 8 Oct 2013

24

Project Component Estimated Required Area (m2)

Acquired by

UNOCAL (m2)

Acquired by SOL as of

Dec 2018 (m2)

Total Land Owners (as acquired by

SOL)

Month/Year

Technical Solution for grievances – NIL

Drainage expansion

in Aek Accimun - - 3,307 12

Dec 2015; Feb

2016

Grievance

Remediation Plant - - 3,232 3 July 2016

Sediment Pond in

Simataniari - - 1,590 2 June 2017

Drainage & Damage

Land at Nahumarpe - - 1,932 8 Dec 2017

Grievance

Nahumarpe

Fumarole

- - 8,583 5 March 2018

TOTAL 1,371,638 422,922 1,273,872 450

The land acquisition process allocated for power plant was largely completed and reported

in SSCAR 2014, except the land acquired for Access Road 5 and WJP 1 N.

The majority of the land owners for Access Road 5 and WJP 1N resided in Sibaganding

and Lumban Jaean village in Pahae Julu district. The land has been identified and

surveyed in consultation with the affected land owners and the surrounding land owners.

Payment was also settled satisfactorily.

2.5. LAND ACQUISITION FOR TRANSMISSION LINE

For the 150 kV T/L, the land purchased is used as platforms for the tower footing (not for

transmission lines). Approximately 38 towers were built with a distance of 400 m between

each of the tower. SOL maximized the use of forestry land where possible. Where land

owners are unwilling to sell their lands, SOL looked for alternative to reroute of the tower

footing so as to avoid involuntary land acquisition.

Land procurement and compensation for T/L was settled and paid to the land owners. The

compensation paid to land owners whose lands are within T/L ROW were in the following

forms:

a. Easement fee of 10% land value (without plants) of the land value of land for tower

bases during the land acquisition without deduction for taxes and administration cost.

It was cash compensation 10% of IDR 65,000 per m2 for the loss of the use of land at

replacement cost.

Compensation cost for plants (trees, crops, etc) below T/L ROW which is based on the

rates issued by agricultural agency. The price is based on the age of plants reflecting

the type/category (seeds, unproductive and productive); the compensation rate is

25

based on the age of plants (current/actual condition/type of land) as agreed with the

land owners.

RP reports the estimated total area of land required for T/L is as follows:

T/L RoW: 165,000 m2 (16,5 ha) with easement fee

Tower footing: 4 ha

The transmission line passes through villages which are:

SIL- Silangkitang and Sigurung-gurung

NIL- Sitolu Ama, Hutabarat, Sibaganding, Lumban Jaean, Simanampang,

Simataniari, Onang Hasang and Lontung Dolok

As reported in the SSMR December 2019, the land acquired for the T/L facility is divided

into land for tower foundation ± 4 ha and RoW where payment was only done for easement

fee for ± 20 ha of land. The detail is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Summary of Land Acquired for 150 kV Transmission Line

Project Component Acquired as

per Dec 2018 (m2)

Total Land

Owners

Compensation payment for land

(IDR) Month/Year

Tower Foundation - land

purchased 40,835 58

± 2,678,840,000 Feb 2014; Dec 2015;

April 2017

ROW - land

compensation/easement

fee

207,091 210

± 2,030,966,250

Oct 2014; Dec 2015;

Feb 2016; June 2016;

July 2016; May 2017;

July 2017; Aug 2017

Total 247,926 268 ± 4,709,806,250

26

3. RESETTLEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

3.1. LAND SELECTION PROCESS

The land acquisition process conducted by SOL follows steps described in Figure 2.

Appendix A shows sample of land acquisition process in photographs.

With regards to land allocated for T/L, SOL maximized the use of forestry land where

possible. Where land owners are unwilling to sell their lands, SOL looked for alternative to

reroute. The line routing was determined considering technical and economic factors as

well as environmental and social aspects including:

avoiding traversing or passing closely by urban areas, densely populated areas,

settlement, schools, public buildings and market places;

avoiding traversing or passing closely by shrines, historical places, national parks

and protected areas;

avoiding traversing in forest and water catchment zones;

keeping the electrical field, magnetic field, audible noise and TV interference as far

as possible below national or international accepted levels;

keeping the impacts on flora, fauna, nesting places, animal trails, migration zones

and sensitive ecological areas to a minimum; and

applying selected bush clearing that minimise access tracks.

3.2. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligibility criteria applied in the land acquisition process includes:

Compensation to land owners who have lost access to land as a result of Project land

acquisitions, whether or not they have legal title to the land including those with

heritage land claims to the affected land.

Figure 2 SOL land acquisition process

27

Compensation to land owners who have lost plants and structures or any built assets

on land lost as a result of Project land acquisitions, including those with heritage land

claims to the affected land.

Compensation and Resettlement Assistance to land owners who have lost housing

as a result of Project land acquisition, including those with heritage land claims to the

affected land.

Income Restoration to land owners whose incomes have been significantly affected

by loss of access to land as a result of Project land acquisition, whether or not they

have legal title to the land, including with heritage land claims to the affected land.

Transition Assistance to land owners who are of special social categories which

render them more vulnerable to social and economic displacement and also who has

lost of access to land as a result of Project land acquisition.

Table 3 presents the entitlement matrix followed by SOL.

Table 3 Entitlements Matrix

No Type of Loss Types of Land

Owners Entitlement Details

1 Loss of land Legal owners

Land owners with heritage land rights

Compensation at

replacement cost

Appropriate price/compensation as mutually agreed with the land owners

This value is all inclusive of the market price land value plus additional transaction costs.

60 days’ notice for agricultural lands to harvest standing seasonal crops. If notice cannot be given, compensation for share of crops will be provided

Additional compensation for vulnerable households or support to find and negotiate for replacement land

Payment of all taxes and administrative costs will be borne by SOL

2 Loss of trees, crops, perennials

Owners and beneficiaries of land use

Compensation based on agriculture agency. (agriculture agency issues rates on an annual basis.

The price is based on the age of plants reflecting the type/category (seeds, unproductive and productive); the compensation rate is based on the age of plants (current/actual condition/type of land)

Cash compensation for the loss of trees, crops, perennials

60 days advance notice to land owners to harvest fruits, standing crops, and remove trees, if desired

28

No Type of Loss Types of Land

Owners Entitlement Details

as agreed with the land owners.

3 Loss of structure and business

Property owners Compensation at replacement value, including lost assets

Moving assistance

Appropriate price/compensation as mutually agreed with the land owners

Moving assistance in lump sum payment

4 Significant loss of income

Land owners with significant loss of income due to loss of land use

Priority for vocational training and BDS, and Project employment

Prioritize employment offer from SOL (or Project contractor) Agriculture and livelihood restoration are components of the ISP

5 Moderate loss of income

Land owners with moderate loss of income due to loss of land use

Priority for Project employment

Prioritize employment offer from SOL (or Project contractor)

6 Losses experienced by vulnerable groups

Vulnerable house-holds including households headed by women, elderly, very poor or those with disabled or many children

Additional assistance to households according to vulnerability levels

Employment offer from SOL (or Project contractor) for 24 months

Priority for CDP Health and Education components

Priority for CDP components agriculture and livelihood restoration

7 Non-land economic displacement

Households at risk of income loss

Priority for Agriculture and livelihood restoration

Agriculture and livelihood restoration are components of the Community Development Plan

SOL will give employment preferences to these land owners households, if appropriate

8 Land Owners whose lands within T/L ROW

Legal owners

Land owners with heritage land rights

Structure owners

Compensation at easement fee of 10% current land value of land for tower bases without deductions for taxes and administration cost.

Compensation at easement fee of 15% of current structure value.

Cash compensation 10% of IDR 65,000 per m2 for the loss of the use of land at replacement cost.

Cash compensation 15% of structure value based on list of structure value from appraisal team.

3.3. AFFECTED PEOPLE

As the identification of affected people was conducted along the Project progress, SOL

anticipated any changes in the actual total number of affected land owners.

29

The RP reported the changes in the number of affected land owners. Table 4 presents the

land owners identified and updated by SOL.

Table 4 Affected Land Owners

Project Component Updated total number of LO

Apr 2014 Aug 2014 Dec 2018

Land acquisition

a. Tower footing 27 55 58

b. Access Road 5 & WJP

1N 12 19 21

Total 39 74 79

Easement fee

c. T/L RoW 138 188 210

Referring to the eligibility criteria, SOL identification of affected people was based on the

following categories:

Significantly affected: Those losing 10% or more of their productive assets

(income-generating assets) and/or requiring physical displacement of housing

Most vulnerable: Those losing more than 50% of their total land holding or those

whose remaining land will be unviable, that equals to or less than 400 m2 with the

following criteria:

a. below the poverty line

b. the elderly

c. household headed by women and have many children

3.4. VALUE OF COMPENSATION

Based on iterative consultations with the land owners, the final compensation offered by

SOL for land alone was IDR 65,000 per m2.

In addition to the land, there is also compensation for plants. The valuation for plants was

based on applicable rates issued by the Agriculture Agency in the North Tapanuli Regency

rates that based on:

o Type of plants

o Age of plants

o Productivity

30

The compensation payment by SOL apparently was way beyond the then existing market rate

and practice. The valuation methodology for the land and plants compensation was based on

sub-district office reference for PLN which was only IDR 50,000 per m2 in 2010. In the

meantime, the land market prices in 2013 -2014 in the Pahae area was only (IDR 35,000

per m2) including for crops or plants. In case of SOL, the payment offered for land and

crops/plants was IDR 125,000 per m2, which is definitely considered above the market

replacement value. Based on interviews conducted with some of the land owners, the

replacement cost paid enabled them to purchase new land of similar type and value, hence

improved their economy. Highlights of interview are briefly discussed below.

1. Mr Simbolon (Silangkitang village): The replacement cost was used to purchase land

in Riau (Pekan Baru).

2. Mr. Rudi Sitompul (Simataniari village): It was used to purchase land in NIL area,

starting his own business and renovate his house.

3. Mr. Rojakat (Simataniari village): The replacement cost was utilized for his children’s

education and renovated his house.

4. Mr. Saul Sitompul (Sigurung-gurung village): The replacement cost was for renovating

his house and starting new business as local vendor.

5. Mr. Jaldi Siregar (Onan Hasang village): Replacement cost was used to expand his

existing small vehicle repair workshop and renovating his house.

During the land acquisition, there was no permanent structure (house/building) relocation

took place. However, there were six temporary structures in SIL and five in NIL that were

compensated. Mostly were small huts and pig pens in the paddy field with average width

of 2 m2. Regulation in Indonesia does not specify the compensation for temporary

structure. SOL paid compensation IDR 1,000,000 for each temporary structure based on

mutual agreement with the affected land owner.

3.5. CUT-OFF DATE

Establishing a cut-off date ensures PAP understand the date of completion of the census

and eligibility. The cut-off dates that established for the implementation of RP were:

21 February 2014 only applied for tower footprints land owners

22, 23 & 24 October 2014 for T-line RoW

3 October 2013 for WJP1 and 9 Dec 2014 for Road 5 land owners

SOL informed the AP about cut-off date through meetings and consultations.

3.6. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN

The RP 2015 reports that an estimated budget of IDR 33,800,000,000 was allocated for the

procurement of land through negotiated settlement for T/L and additional Access Road 5 and

WJP 1N. This amount excluded the easement fee for the COI, budget for trees (fruit-bearing

31

and timber) and crops (rice paddy, perennial and standing) which were determined following

a detailed census and asset inventory.

The actual amount of budget as per the total land acquired as reported in SSMR 2018 is ± IDR

34,214,244,350. This change was due to:

Additional land required during the process which also affected the number of land

owners.

The inclusion of easement fee for COI, compensation for trees and crops based on

the census and asset inventory conducted.

Compensation for temporary structures.

Income restoration activities and transition assistance for vulnerable groups were provided

within the scope of the IPP budget for which a budget of ± IDR 200,000,000 was allocated.

During implementation, SOL identified the need for new well. As such, supplementary Land Acquisition Plan for NIL-E1 was prepared with estimated budget of ± IDR 6,483,898,900 for land and crop compensation. Total spending for land acquisition (RP & Supplementary Land Acquisition Plan) is ± IDR

40,432,718,250. Detail budget allocated, and total spending are presented in Appendix B.

4. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

This chapter discusses briefs on the socio-economic of the affected people and the

implementation of livelihood restoration program activities for the affected people. The

components of the livelihood restoration are consisting of the following program:

1. Livelihood restoration program for the most vulnerable land owners

2. Employment opportunity

3. Integrated social program

SOL incorporates the LRP implementation and monitoring into the ISP as part of the IPP.

To measure achievement and progress, SOL sets out a timeline base on the Project

phases for the implementation to include:

Short term: social program implemented in 2015 – 2017

Mid-term: social program implemented in 2018 – 2023

Long term: social program implemented in 2023 onwards

In 2015 - 2018 the Project was at construction phase where around ± 867 (42%) of locals

including land owners were recruited to work in the Project as unskilled, semi- skilled and

skilled labour.

32

Table 5 Local Worker Hired in Construction Period 2015 - 2017

Year Period Unskilled Semi-

skilled - Skilled

Total Local

Labour

% of Local

Labour

Total All Labour

2015 Semester - 1 402 429 831 47% 1.772

Semester - 2 603 662 1.265 42% 3.045

2016 Semester - 1 726 579 1.305 45% 2.885

Semester - 2 603 565 1.168 35% 3.300

2017 Semester - 1 418 1.092 1.510 41% 3.664

Semester - 2 174 266 440 40% 1.100

2018 Semester - 1 81 166 247 39% 626

Semester - 2 52 121 173 43% 404

Total 3.059 3.880 6.939 16.796

Average 382 485 867 42% 2.100

Currently ISP implementation is still in the mid-term phase where year 2018-2024 is

transition to operation phase where local communities returned back to their farming

activities.

In this chapter, the focus is on the implementation of short-term program and the

implementation of early phase of mid-term phase (2015-2018).

4.1. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF AFFECTED PEOPLE

Surveys and consultations were conducted for this RCR. This section will elaborate the

socio-economic profile of the affected people based on the surveys and consultations

carried out by ERM in 2014-2015 as baseline study which was discussed in RP document

and socio-economic survey conducted by USU in Dec -2017 – Jan 2018.

RP 2015 includes discussion about baseline survey on socio-economic condition of the

affected people conducted by ERM in April 2014. There were 150 land owners selected

as respondents through purposive sampling methods. The respondents who were

interviewed representing each of Project Affected Villages (PAVs). Majority of respondents

owned the land acquired for the tower footing, T/L RoW, Access Road 5 and WJP 1N.

Reportedly, there were labour shortages in agricultural sector due to the increased number

of people migrating away from the area (especially the younger generations). Females

played significant role to fulfil the manpower needs while still having a key role in

maintaining the household.

ERM identified that most affected households (90.67%) worked as farmers with majority

of vulnerable household heads were elderly people and females. Most vulnerable

households had more difficulty to access employment opportunities; while for women, their

multiple roles causing more difficulty to maintain a full-time occupation.

ERM also reported that:

33

Majority of PAHs lost a significant portion (>10%) of the land used for income

generating purpose. However, they have another source of income (such as cacao

planting, cultivating their remaining land for paddy, rubber, corn and other types of

plant, raising livestock, remittance from their children who live outside of North

Tapanuli, small businesses or working in the project) so that they could maintain

the same level of income.

There were eight structural assets (permanent and semi-permanent) compensated

due to affected by Project; but no physical displacement undertaken.

No PAHs were identified to have lost of business

The ERM survey is used as a baseline to assess progress. In the survey conducted by

USU 2018, USU applied multiple methods to include in-depth interviews, Focus Group

Discussions and Participatory Rural Appraisal. 457 respondents were involved in the

survey: land owners (344) and non-land owners selected across 11 villages (113). The

respondents’ category is presented in Table 5.

Table 6 Total Respondents Involved in USU Social Survey

No Type Respondent Percentage (%)

1 Main Facilities 136 29.76

2 Tower Site 28 39.39

3 Right of Way 180 6.13

4 Non-land owners 113 24.73

Total 457 100.00

USU generally discussed the following aspects in the survey report:

Socio-economic profile

Employment opportunities

Impact on livelihood

Data collection by USU using questionnaires reported that land acquisition has no major

impact to land owners because they have other source of income, such as from their small

warung (coffee shop), renting out housing, cultivating remaining land either paddy or

perennial plants and also working in the project. Only small numbers reported that land

acquisition process had impacts on livelihoods: land owners (4.3%) and non-land owners

(2%). This is generally aligned with ERM survey in 2014 (see 4.1.1).

On the livelihood /income restoration, based on the survey conducted by USU in 2017

and ERM in 2014, data shows that some of the land owners’ income were better off after

their land was acquired by the Project, while most of land owners have the same level of

34

income before and after the Project. Table 6 presents the minimum wage and inflation

rate in North Tapanuli over the period of 2014-2017.

Table 7 Minimum wage in North Tapanuli Regency and inflation rate in 2014 -2017

Year Minimum Wage of North

Tapanuli Regency Inflation Rate*

2014 Rp 1.325.000 As baseline value

2015 Rp 1.653.225 5,90%

2016 Rp 1.843.346 5,95%

2017 Rp 1.995.422 4,30%

Total 16,5%

Average 5,38%

*Source: Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Regional Prov. Sumatera Utara oleh Bank Indonesia, 2017

Table 8 Income comparison of 17 most vulnerable land owners based on 2014-2017 inflation

No. Land Owner Village

Income in 2014 (ERM social

Survey) IDR

Income in 2014

converses to 2017

(inflation rate 16,5%)

IDR

Income in 2017

(USU social survey)

IDR

Remarks

1

MV 1 Silangkitang N/A N/A N/A

LO did not disclose her income during the interview/survey. The LO was considered most vulnerable because she and her husband are elderly and look after their 2 disabled children. LO appeared to be maintaining the same level of income as their housing condition did not change much. They still lived in the same house as before.

2 MV 2 Silangkitang 425.000 495.125 3.225.001

3 MV 3 Silangkitang 375.000 436.875 3.840.000

4 MV 4 Sigurung-gurung 490.000 570.850 9.600.000



7 MV 7 Janji Natogu 283.000 329.695 6.720.000

8 MV 8 Sibaganding 265.000 308.725 4.096.000

9 MV 9 Lumban Jaean 498.333 580.558 2.400.000

10 MV 10 Lumban Jaean 600.000 699.000 4.800.000

35



Survey) IDR

Income in 2014

converses to 2017


IDR

Income in 2017

(USU social survey)

IDR

Remarks

11 MV 11 Lumban Jaean 630.000 733.950 4.320.000

12

MV 12 Simataniari N/A N/A N/A

In 2014, LO was sick and passed away in 2016. So, it was the wife who received the assistance because she is a widow and elderly and lives by herself. In 2017, LO was not available during USU survey because she was visiting her children outside of Tapanuli. The fact that the she was visiting her children outside Tapanuli during the USU survey may positively indicate that she has some spare money to be able to afford the travel outside Tapanuli and/or she was taken care of well by her children.

13 MV 13 Janji Natogu 275.000 320.375 7.680.000

14

MV 14 Simataniari N/A N/A 3.482.500

LO did not disclose her income during the interview/survey in 2014 but considered most vulnerable due to the LO condition, poor, widow and elderly based on confirmation from Head of Village.

15

MV 15 Simataniari N/A N/A 7.680.000

LO did not disclose her income during the interview/survey in 2014 but considered most vulnerable due to the LO condition, poor, widow and elderly based on confirmation from Head of Village.

16 MV 16 Sibaganding 450.833 525.220 5.766.000

17

MV 17 Lumban Jaean 490.000 570.850 N/A

LO did not disclose her income during the interview/survey. However, she appeared to be maintaining the same level of income and

36



Survey) IDR

Income in 2014

converses to 2017


IDR

Income in 2017

(USU social survey)

IDR

Remarks

she also receives monthly support from his son who works as security in SOL from 2016 to date.

The analysis for the level of income before and after the land acquisition was

considering the average inflation rate of 5,3% from 2014-2017. Table 8 shows that

generally the actual income of the 17 most vulnerable people in 2017 is more or less

the same with, or even higher from, the actual pre-project level income of 2014. This

is still the case when compared to the projected 16.5% inflated income. The conclusion

is justifiable even though two of the surveyed respondents did not disclose their

income, and one respondent could not be reached at the time of survey. Therefore, it

is concluded that income restoration to 100% of immediate pre-Project level was

achieved.

The USU Social Survey was intended to verify whether the Project social impacts were

managed and complied with applicable standards. However, in the 2018 report USU

did not further elaborate the data analysis and had limited and very narrow explanation

to support the findings.

In filling the gaps, the results of the USU Social Survey were further strengthened and

clarified by conducting a qualitative assessment through internal review and

verification using the more comprehensive BPS poverty key indicators, while keep

monitoring the actual ISP implementation results on the ground. The review against

USU Social Survey report is presented in below Sections.

4.2. VULNERABLE GROUPS AND LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION

Livelihood restoration program for the most vulnerable land owners were implemented

through the provision of employment in the project and distribution of assistance program

which was provided based on the consultation with the most vulnerable group undertaken

by SOL CSR team. RP and SSCAR categorize the most vulnerable group based on the

following criteria:

remaining land holding

below the poverty line

the elderly

household headed by women and have many children

In 2013, ERM reported that 98 out of 191 land owners were significantly affected or losing

more than 10% of their productive or income-generating assets because of land

acquisition.

37

Based on field verification, SOL confirmed that amongst those 98 losing more than 10%

of their productive land, 68 were not categorized as vulnerable because they were

recognized as middle-income earners such as civil servants, local contractors, and small

business/shops owners (ref. IPP document section 5.11.2); but 30 land owners were

grouped as vulnerable people.

Of these 30 vulnerable people, 13 were employed by SOL (either by main contractors or

subcontractors), earning additional income, while 17 were identified as most the vulnerable

affected people. The most vulnerable is entitled to have assistance program and

employment opportunities.

SOL selected the 17 most vulnerable families as the beneficiaries of its assistance

program outlined in the LRP based on the following criteria:

Household experiencing more than 50% of productive land being acquired

Household whose remaining land has not yet been productive after the acquisition

Household affected by land acquisition and living in poverty

Household headed by widow or elderly

The LRP considered the most vulnerable group (17 people) eligible for assistance based

on the criteria outlined in the RP.

The validation of the potential beneficiaries was done by SOL ER team, including the

member originating from the same village. The ER Team validated the vulnerability status

by directly visiting their houses and interviewed the household members. SOL also

collected information from the staff who has a kinship relation with or who is part of the

extended family member of the land owners. The information from the field was taken into

account to validate the appropriateness of the vulnerability status of the potential

beneficiaries.

The assistance program delivered to the 17 land owners were based on the consultation

conducted with the land owners. They proposed the assistance program which they

deemed most suitable to their condition and has potential to help improving their economy

as follows:

Twelve (12) land owners proposed to have assistance on livestock breeding such

as pigs, ducks and chickens.

One (1) land owner proposed the assistance for a hand tractor so that he can do

his farming activities more effectively.

Four (4) land owners proposed for the assistance and support for opening small

coffee shops

SOL Team reviewed the proposed programs against the potentiality of the programs to

improve the land owners’ livelihood and reduce their level of vulnerability.

Since the program started, SOL CSR Team conducted a periodic monitoring of the

assistance program for the 17 land owners. Based on the monitoring conducted in January

2019 as presented in table 10 below, it is reported that:

38

Seven (7) people have managed to run the assistance well and experienced

positive impacts on their income. Out of the seven (7) people, only four (4) people

are still running the assistance;

One (1) person moved to another city, Batam, to live with her son;

Twelve (12) people did not manage to continue the assistance, but their standard

of living is improved. These land owners did not manage to run the assistance due

to the following condition:

For land owners with livestock assistance program: there was lack of consistency and

commitment in running the program. Some of the livestock were not maintained and

treated based on the technical advice provided by SOL’s CSR team in the beginning of

the program and during monitoring.

Land owners with assistance for small coffee shop (warung): the coffee shop was mostly

opened during construction within the Project area, thus at that time there were still many

customers. However, upon the completion of the construction phase, there were less

customers and some land owners opted to close the coffee shop. There was one land

owner who, from the very beginning, was not very serious in running his coffee shop and

did not follow the advices provided by SOL. As a result, the land owner did not gain much

benefits from the assistance.

Of the-12-not successful people, SOL employed seven (7) people, four (4) of whom

already worked for 24-36 months, while three (3) people for less than 24 months. The

remaining five (5) people were not employed or did not work for the SOL Project. SOL

considered this group of five people to be evaluated for further program recommendation

in the next phase of the ISP.

Measuring poverty only based on income does not really reflect the actual condition of

affected people in the context of the region. In Indonesia, besides income, the Indonesian

government’s Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) also has established the standard of living

indicators to assess the poverty line in the country.

The Indonesia standard of living consists of 14 indicators set by the BPS to measure the

household economic profile.

Table 9 BPS Standard of Living Indicators

No Standard of Living Indicator

K 1 Width of flooring area of housing is less than 8 m2 per person

K 2 The type of housing floor made of soil/bamboo/wood

K 3 Type of housing wall made of from bamboo/thatch/low quality of wood/wall without plastering

K 4 No toilet facility/joint facility with other households

K 5 Household lighting sources do not use electricity

K 6 The source of drinking water is from wells/unprotected springs/rivers/rainwater

39

No Standard of Living Indicator

K 7 Daily cooking fuel is wood/charcoal/kerosene

K 8 Consume meat/milk/chicken only once a week

K 9 Only buy one set of new clothes in a year

K 10 Meal consumption only one/two times a day

K 11 Unable to pay for medical expenses at the Puskesmas/Policlinic

K 12 The source of income of the head of the household is: farmers with a land area of 500m2, farm

laborers, fishermen, construction workers, plantation workers and/or other jobs with income

below Rp 600,000 per month

K 13 The highest education is the head of the household: Do not have formal education / not

completing elementary school/ finishing elementary school

K 14 Does not have savings/goods that are easily sold with a minimum of Rp 500,000, - such as

credit/non-credit motorcycles, gold, livestock, motorized boats, or other capital goods

Source: BPS

If a household embraces at least nine of the 14 standards of living indicators defined by the

BPS, such household will be categorized as living below poverty line. Referring to the BPS

standard of living indicators, SOL confirmed that the 17 most vulnerable land owners are

not categorized as poor nor living under poverty line. Table 11 presents SOL verification

matrix.

The 41 considered poor households by the USU SS, which merely used ‘income” as the

basis for measurement, were further verified and double-checked against the BPS standard

of living indicators. Such verification of the 41 poor households against the BPS indicators

did not actually find any single household embracing nine BPS indicators at once. On the

contrary, the verification results using BPS indicators are as follows:

5 households embrace 1 BPS indicator

18 households embrace 2 BPS indicators




Moreover, a further verification was conducted on the 41 land owners, looking at both their

income and expenses. This follow-up verification is necessary since the USU SS was

limited by the fact that only 21 out of 41 respondent households had given answers to the

question about their main income. When the investigative lens being used is then changed

to ‘income and expenses’ the result shows that basically there are only 11 land owners

that are considered poor or living below the poverty line.

40

Assessment needs to be conducted for the remaining 11 land owners living below the

poverty to further evaluate these people so that they can be included in a meaningful way

in the LRP program and the future ISP.

41

Tab

le 1

0 A

ssis

tan

ce P

rog

ram

fo

r th

e 17

Mo

st V

uln

erab

le H

ou

seh

old

s

No

L

and

ow

ne

r V

illag

e

Typ

e o

f a

ssi

sta

nc

e

Ass

ista

nc

e d

eliv

ere

d

Up

da

te a

s o

f Ju

ne

201

9

1

MV

1

Sila

ngkita

ng

Liv

esto

ck (

5 p

igs),

an

ima

l fe

ed

& v

ita

min

s, vaccin

es a

nd z

inc

roof fo

r pig

pe

n

27 F

eb

20

16

4 li

vesto

ck d

ied

due to

seasona

l dis

ease a

nd 1

liv

esto

ck

has b

ee

n s

old

. T

here

is n

o liv

esto

ck r

em

ain

ing

. L

and

ow

ners

did

no

t fo

llow

SO

L’s

te

chn

ical a

dvic

e a

nd

lack o

f con

sis

tency in

run

nin

g th

e p

rogra

m.

2

MV

2

Sila

ngkita

ng

Mate

rials

to c

onstr

uct

ad

ditio

na

l bu

ildin

g t

o t

he e

xis

tin

g s

ma

ll coffee s

hop t

hat sh

e o

wne

d a

nd

als

o t

he

fund t

o c

onstr

uct th

e

bu

ildin

g,

ad

ditio

na

l w

are

s f

or

the c

off

ee s

ho

p. It

is loca

ted a

t th

e left s

ide

of

SIL

PP

the

en

tra

nce

19 F

eb -

10 M

ar

2016

Th

e w

aru

ng

(coff

ee s

hop)

was b

ig a

nd

div

ide

d i

n t

wo

part

s,

on

e u

sed f

or

lan

d o

wner’s w

aru

ng

and

th

e o

the

r p

art

was r

en

ted t

o b

e u

se

d a

s w

aru

ng a

s w

ell.

Both

w

aru

ng

w

as ru

nn

ing w

ell

an

d m

ost

custo

me

rs w

ere

constr

uction

work

ers

. It

ran w

ell

for

abo

ut 1 y

ear a

nd s

he

has e

xperi

ence

d p

ositiv

e im

pact on

her in

com

e fro

m th

is

pro

gra

m.

How

ever,

sin

ce t

he c

onstr

uction p

ha

se in S

IL h

as b

ee

n

com

ple

ted,

cu

sto

mers

were

decre

asin

g.

Curr

ently t

he

lan

d o

wne

r is

ren

ting

ou

t th

e c

offe

e s

ho

p b

uild

ing

to

he

r re

lative.

3

MV

3

Sila

ngkita

ng

Liv

esto

ck (

5 p

igs),

an

ima

l fe

ed

& v

ita

min

s, vaccin

es a

nd z

inc

roof fo

r pig

pe

n

27 F

eb

20

16

3 l

ivesto

ck d

ied d

ue t

o s

easo

na

l d

ise

ase,

and

2 le

ft.

CS

R t

eam

has g

iven s

om

e a

dvic

e o

n h

ow

to

eff

ective

ly

tre

at th

e r

em

ain

ing

ones.

H

ow

ever,

land o

wn

er

did

not

follo

w t

he a

dvic

e w

ell

an

d

coup

le

mo

nth

s

late

r th

e

rem

ain

ing

2

livesto

ck

die

d.

Curr

ently,

Lan

d o

wne

r h

as m

oved t

o B

ata

m a

nd l

ive

s

with

he

r son

.

42

No

L

and

ow

ne

r V

illag

e

Typ

e o

f a

ssi

sta

nc

e

Ass

ista

nc

e d

eliv

ere

d

Up

da

te a

s o

f Ju

ne

201

9

4

MV

4

Sig

uru

ng-

gu

run

g

Co

okin

g e

quip

ment

and

mate

rials

/ware

s for

her

sm

all

coffee s

hop

1

9 F

eb

20

16

Th

e

assis

tance

giv

en

used

to

make

va

rietie

s

of

tra

ditio

nal

snacks in

h

er

sm

all

wa

rung

/ coff

ee sh

op.

Durin

g t

he c

onstr

uctio

n p

eri

od,

so

me

of

her

custo

mers

w

ere

th

e w

ork

ers

an

d th

e c

offe

e s

ho

p w

ere

run

nin

g w

ell.

C

urr

ently,

the c

off

ee

shop

is s

till

run

nin

g e

ven t

ho

ug

h

now

cu

sto

mer

is le

sser

sin

ce constr

uctio

n w

ork

s are

com

ple

ted a

nd

als

o b

ecau

se

ma

ny n

ew

coff

ee

sho

ps

are

op

en

ed in th

e a

rea.

5

MV

5

S

iguru

ng-

gu

run

g

Liv

esto

ck (

5 p

igs),

an

ima

l fe

ed

& v

ita

min

s, vaccin

es a

nd z

inc

roof fo

r pig

pe

n

27 F

eb

20

16

2

live

sto

ck

die

d

du

e

to

seasona

l d

isease

, and

3

rem

ain

ing. C

SR

tea

m h

as g

iven s

om

e a

dvic

e o

n h

ow

to

e

ffective

ly t

rea

t th

e r

em

ain

ing

ones.

Th

e l

ive

sto

ck h

as

pro

du

ce

d p

ig b

ree

ds,

and

so

me

has b

een s

old

to h

elp

th

e

lan

d

ow

ner’

s

da

ughte

r education

. H

ow

eve

r,

last

year

all

rem

ain

ing liv

esto

ck h

as b

een s

old

to s

up

po

rt h

is

me

dic

al tr

ea

tme

nt. C

urr

en

tly, he

has r

ecovere

d fro

m h

is

illne

ss a

nd g

radu

ally

be

ing a

ctive in

farm

ing

.

6

MV

6

Sig

uru

ng-

gu

run

g

Liv

esto

ck (

5 p

igs),

an

ima

l fe

ed

& v

ita

min

s, vaccin

es a

nd z

inc

roof fo

r pig

pe

n

27 F

eb

20

16

All

livesto

ck d

ied d

ue t

o c

ho

lera

. T

his

conditio

n

wa

s

du

e

to

lack

of

se

riousn

ess

and

consis

tency i

n m

ain

tain

ing a

nd t

reating t

he l

ivesto

ck i

n

accord

ance

with

th

e g

uid

an

ce g

ive

n in t

he

be

gin

nin

g o

f th

e p

rogra

m.

7

MV

7

Janji

Nato

gu

Liv

esto

ck (

5 p

igs),

an

ima

l fe

ed

& v

ita

min

s, vaccin

es a

nd z

inc

roof fo

r pig

pe

n

27 F

eb

20

16

Due t

o a

sudd

en o

utb

reak,

all

livesto

ck d

ied

. In

201

8,

lan

d o

wn

er

passed a

way,

and

his

wife t

ook c

are

of

2

pig

lets

she

bo

ught

to

repla

ce

the

death

liv

esto

ck.

How

ever,

those

pig

lets

als

o d

ied.

Th

is

conditio

n

wa

s

du

e

to

lack

of

se

riousn

ess

and

consis

tency i

n m

ain

tain

ing

and t

reating t

he l

ivesto

ck i

n

accord

ance

with

th

e g

uid

an

ce g

ive

n in t

he

be

gin

nin

g o

f th

e p

rogra

m.

43

No

L

and

ow

ne

r V

illag

e

Typ

e o

f a

ssi

sta

nc

e

Ass

ista

nc

e d

eliv

ere

d

Up

da

te a

s o

f Ju

ne

201

9

8

MV

8

Sib

ag

and

ing

Liv

esto

ck (

5 p

igs),

an

ima

l fe

ed

& v

ita

min

s, vaccin

es a

nd z

inc

roof fo

r pig

pe

n

8 M

ar

201

6

4

livesto

ck

die

d,

an

d

1

rem

ain

ing

h

as

pro

duce

d

4

pig

lets

. C

SR

ha

d a

dvis

ed

him

to c

lean

th

e s

urr

ound

ing

pig

pen

to

avoid

m

osqu

itos,

flie

s

that

ma

y

ca

use

dis

ea

ses to

th

e liv

esto

ck.

Du

ring 2

01

8,

1 sw

ine

ha

s

pro

du

ce

d p

igle

ts t

wic

e.

Th

ere

are

re

ma

inin

g 5

pig

lets

m

ain

tain

ed.

Th

ose

liv

esto

ck h

ave

he

lped

th

eir c

hild

ren

educatio

n, as r

eve

ale

d b

y h

is w

ife.

9

MV

9

Lum

ban

Jaean

Liv

esto

ck (

5 p

igs),

an

ima

l fe

ed

& v

ita

min

s, vaccin

es a

nd z

inc

roof fo

r pig

pe

n

8 M

ar

201

6

Th

e lan

d o

wn

er

ha

s g

ood

und

ers

tan

din

g o

f pig

fa

rmin

g

me

tho

ds. 1 li

vesto

ck h

as b

een s

old

with

50

kg o

f w

eig

ht,

1

w

as

so

ld

and

re

pla

ced

w

ith

anoth

er

2

pig

lets

, 2

livesto

ck d

ied of

dis

ea

se

. D

urin

g 2

018,

livesto

ck ha

s

pro

du

ce

d p

igle

ts 3

tim

es;

with

to

tal

of

16 p

igle

ts,

so

me

were

sold

and r

em

ain

ing 5

pig

s a

re m

ain

tain

ed

.

10

M

V 1

0

Lum

ban

Jaean

Liv

esto

ck (

5 p

igs),

an

ima

l fe

ed

& v

ita

min

s, vaccin

es a

nd z

inc

roof fo

r pig

pe

n

8 M

ar

201

6

3 li

vesto

ck w

ere

so

ld, 1

wa

s m

ade

as s

ire

. B

y th

e e

nd

of

2018

, th

e r

em

ain

ing

1 l

ive

sto

ck d

ied,

an

d h

e d

oes n

ot

repla

ce w

ith a

ny n

ew

pig

lets

. T

his

conditio

n

wa

s

du

e

to

lack

of

se

riousn

ess

and

consis

tency i

n m

ain

tain

ing a

nd t

reating t

he l

ivesto

ck i

n

accord

ance

with

th

e g

uid

an

ce g

ive

n in t

he

be

gin

nin

g o

f th

e p

rogra

m.

11

M

V 1

1

Lum

ban

Jaean

Liv

esto

ck s

eed (

200

du

ck),

vitam

in &

an

imal fe

ed, n

et

3 M

ar

201

6

Mo

st

of

the

liv

esto

ck d

ied,

on

ly 1

5%

le

ft.

One

of

the

reasons

is

that

the

la

nd

o

wners

did

n

ot

follo

w

the

instr

uctio

ns/a

dvic

e giv

en b

y C

SR

te

am

. S

om

e o

f th

e

livesto

ck w

ere

con

sum

ed

an

d th

e r

em

ain

ing w

as d

ied.

Th

is

conditio

n

wa

s

du

e

to

lack

of

se

riousn

ess

and

consis

tency i

n m

ain

tain

ing a

nd t

reating t

he l

ivesto

ck i

n

accord

ance

with

th

e g

uid

an

ce g

ive

n in t

he

be

gin

nin

g o

f th

e p

rogra

m. S

om

etim

es th

e la

nd o

wn

ers

left

th

e v

illa

ge

to v

isit h

er

ch

ildre

n in o

ther

tow

n f

or

a few

days a

nd left

th

e liv

esto

ck u

na

tte

nd

ed w

hic

h w

ors

ened

the

co

nd

itio

n

of th

e liv

esto

ck.

44

No

L

and

ow

ne

r V

illag

e

Typ

e o

f a

ssi

sta

nc

e

Ass

ista

nc

e d

eliv

ere

d

Up

da

te a

s o

f Ju

ne

201

9

12

M

V 1

2

Sim

ata

nia

ri

Liv

esto

ck s

eed (

200

ch

icke

n),

vitam

in &

an

imal fe

ed, n

et

3 M

ar

201

6

Th

e l

an

d o

wn

er

did

no

t in

tensiv

ely

tre

at

the

liv

esto

ck

beca

use

so

metim

es the

lan

d o

wn

er

go

es o

uts

ide o

f th

e

vill

age for

a p

eri

od o

f tim

e to v

isit h

er

ch

ildre

n. T

hus, th

e

livesto

ck is

a

ban

do

ned.

Som

e of

the liv

esto

ck w

ere

consum

ed a

nd

som

e w

ere

die

d.

Lack o

f goo

d t

reatm

ent

an

d s

eriou

sn

ess in m

ain

tain

ing

as w

ell

run

nin

g t

he

assis

tance

.

13

M

V 1

3

Janji

Nato

gu

1 u

nit o

f ha

nd tra

cto

r fo

r fa

rmin

g

activity

22 M

ar

20

16

Th

e h

and

tra

cto

r h

as b

een

used a

nd h

as a

su

bsta

ntia

l im

pa

ct

on

the

La

nd o

wn

er’

s l

and

pro

ductivity b

ecause

the

la

nd

ow

ner

ca

n

cultiv

ate

a

wid

er

lan

d

wh

ich

is

resu

lted

in

in

cre

asin

g cro

ps an

d im

pro

ve

th

eir fa

mily

in

com

e.

So

metim

es,

it is a

lso r

ente

d t

o o

ther

pe

ople

in

th

e v

illag

e,

withou

t any p

aym

en

t/ in

ce

ntive

.

14

M

V 1

4

Sim

ata

nia

ri

Liv

esto

ck s

ee

d (

200

ch

icke

n),

vitam

in &

an

imal fe

ed, n

et

3 M

ar

201

6

Only

50%

of th

e liv

esto

ck r

em

ain

ed w

hile

th

e o

ther

50%

d

ied.

CS

R t

ea

m a

dvis

ed t

he

lan

d o

wn

er

to im

pro

ve

he

r fa

rmin

g

techn

iques.

Rem

ain

ing

liv

esto

ck

were

n

ot

tre

ate

d in

tensiv

ely

an

d la

ck o

f w

illin

gn

ess to im

pro

ve

th

e

cond

itio

n o

f th

e b

reed

ing p

lace.

So

me

has b

een s

old

a

nd r

em

ain

ing liv

esto

ck d

ied.

Lack o

f goo

d t

reatm

ent

an

d s

eriou

sn

ess in m

ain

tain

ing

as w

ell

run

nin

g t

he

assis

tance

.

15

M

V 1

5

Sim

ata

nia

ri

Liv

esto

ck s

eed (

200

0 g

old

fis

h

seed),

an

imal fe

ed &

net

3 M

ar

201

6

Aro

un

d 4

0%

of

the s

ee

d d

ied

, an

d t

he r

em

ain

ing f

ish

seed

was n

ot in

tensiv

ely

tre

ate

d a

nd

die

d. La

nd o

wner’

s

reasonin

gs a

re s

om

e w

ere

eate

n b

y o

the

r an

ima

l a

nd

som

e w

ere

carr

ied a

wa

y d

urin

g t

he

overf

low

of w

ate

r in

th

e p

ond

. A

ll ha

s b

ee

n s

old

, bu

t th

e la

nd o

wn

er

refu

se

d

to info

rm t

he

weig

ht

of h

er

fish b

ein

g s

old

.

45

No

L

and

ow

ne

r V

illag

e

Typ

e o

f a

ssi

sta

nc

e

Ass

ista

nc

e d

eliv

ere

d

Up

da

te a

s o

f Ju

ne

201

9

Lack o

f goo

d t

reatm

ent

an

d s

eriou

sn

ess in m

ain

tain

ing

as w

ell

run

nin

g t

he

assis

tance

.

16

M

V 1

6

Sib

ag

and

ing

M

ate

rials

, C

ookin

g e

qu

ipm

ent

an

d w

are

s to o

pe

n c

off

ee s

hop

ne

ar

19 F

eb

20

16

Th

e s

ma

ll co

ffee

sho

p c

on

ditio

n i

s n

ot

ma

inta

ined,

the

roof a

nd th

e w

all

are

bro

ke

n. T

he

la

nd

ow

ner

requ

este

d

add

itio

na

l a

ssis

tance

in t

he

form

ta

rpau

lin a

nd

2 w

ate

r p

ipes.

The

la

nd o

wn

er

did

not

routine

ly o

pe

n t

he c

off

ee

shop

an

d it

has b

ee

n c

lose

d.

L

ack o

f serio

usne

ss i

n m

ain

tain

ing

as w

ell

run

nin

g t

he

assis

tance.

17

M

V 1

7

Lum

ban

Jaean

M

ate

rials

for

op

en

ing s

ma

ll coffee s

hop

S

ep

t 20

16

Th

e c

off

ee

sh

op

has b

ee

n r

unnin

g w

ell

for

the

last

on

e

year

sin

ce the

location

is v

ery

str

ate

gic

, n

ea

r th

e P

roje

ct

location.

It h

as h

elp

ed to

im

pro

ve the

fa

mily

’s inco

me.

H

ow

ever,

sin

ce t

he c

om

ple

tion

of co

nstr

uctio

n p

ha

se in

NIL

a

rea,

incom

e

from

th

e

coff

ee

sho

p

has

be

en

decre

asin

g. T

he

coffe

e s

ho

p h

as b

een

clo

sed

.

46

Tab

le 1

1 V

erif

icat

ion

Mat

rix

for

BP

S S

tan

dar

d o

f L

ivin

g o

f th

e 17

Mo

st V

uln

erab

le G

rou

p

No

. L

O N

ame

V

illa

ge

B

PS

Sta

nd

ard

of

Liv

ing

Ind

icat

or

To

tal

Cat

ego

ry

Rem

ark

K

1

K2

K

3

K4

K

5

K6

K

7

K8

K

9

K10

K

11

K

12

K13

K

14

1

MV

1

Sila

ngkitan

g

- -

1

1

- -

- -

1

- -

- -

1

4

No

t P

oor

2

MV

2

Sila

ngkitan

g

- -

1

- -

1

-

-

1

- 3

N

ot P

oor

3

MV

3

Sila

ngkitan

g

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

0

No

t P

oor

Moved

to B

ata

m

4

MV

4

Sig

uru

ng

-gu

rung

- -

1

- -

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

2

No

t P

oor

5

MV

5

Sig

uru

ng

-gu

rung

- -

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

1

- -

2

No

t P

oor

6

MV

6

Sig

uru

ng

-gu

rung

- -

1

- -

- -

- 1

- -

- -

- 2

N

ot P

oor

7

MV

7

Jan

ji N

ato

gu

- -

1

- -

- -

- 1

- -

- -

- 2

N

ot P

oor

Pa

sse

d a

way

8

MV

8

Sib

agand

ing

- -

- -

- -

- 1

- -

- -

- -

1

No

t P

oor

9

MV

9

Lu

mban

Ja

ean

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

0

No

t P

oor

10

MV

10

Lu

mban

Ja

ean

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

0

No

t P

oor

Pa

sse

d a

way

11

MV

11

Lu

mban

Ja

ean

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

0

No

t P

oor

12

MV

12

Sim

ata

nia

ri

- -

1

- -

1

- 1

1

-

1

- 1

6

No

t P

oor

Pa

sse

d a

way

13

MV

13

Jan

ji N

ato

gu

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

0

No

t P

oor

14

MV

14

Sim

ata

nia

ri

- -

1

- -

- -

1

1

- -

- -

1

4

No

t P

oor

15

MV

15

Sim

ata

nia

ri

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

0

No

t P

oor

16

MV

16

Sib

agand

ing

- -

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- 1

N

ot P

oor

17

MV

17

Lu

mban

Ja

ean

- -

1

- -

- -

1

- 1

-

- -

1

4

No

t P

oor

47

4.3. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

As part of the LRP components, employment opportunity was prioritized for the land

owners based on their skill and capability. However, the Project also opened the

opportunity for non-land owners from the affected villages and the villages surrounding

the project area.

IPP 2015 identified that there was high expectation related to employment opportunities

addressed by local communities. IPP reports 50% of total job seekers in the districts were

unemployed. Given most of locals’ education level was high school graduate and low

competency level, SOL employment opportunities offered unskilled workers position for

locals to fill in.

Figure 3 shows number of workers employed by SOL and its contractors in 2015 – 2017.

Figure 3 Workers employed by SOL and its contractors

From the figure above, it shows that the peak period of workers absorption was in the 1st

semester of 2017. Based on USU field data collection 2017, SOL also employed locals

for skilled position as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4 Employment Position for Locals

114

847 811

1,772

123

1,016

1,906

3,045

195

802

1,888

2,885

234

1,139

1,927

3,300

306

703

2,655

3,664

312 303 485

1,100

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

SO

L

HA

L

HD

EC

To

tal

SO

L

HA

L

HD

EC

To

tal

SO

L

HA

L

HD

EC

To

tal

SO

L

HA

L

HD

EC

To

tal

SO

L

HA

L

HD

EC

To

tal

SO

L

HA

L

HD

EC

To

tal

Semester - 1 Semester - 2 Semester - 1 Semester - 2 Semester - 1 Semester - 2

2015 2016 2017

Skilled

80

32%

Unskilled

167

68%

48

Following SOL’s principle of equal opportunity and treatment in employment, SOL also

offered the same opportunities for women to work with SOL. In 2014 - 2018, woman

comprised 30% - 45 % of total unskilled labour for services. The substantial number of

local woman workers indicates that the Batak women in the project area are not limited

by culture to work only in the domestic or agricultural sector, but they are also given the

opportunity by their family to work in the project. Figure 5 presents workers composition

based on gender.

Figure 5 Unskilled workers by gender (2014-2018)

USU recognized that SOL Project development increased the local employment

opportunities. Based on respondent data collection, Table 10 presents the USU analysis

on employment status.

Table 12 Respondents’ Employment Status

Category Employment Experiences Amount Percentage

Land Owner

Employed by SOL 26 15.9

No longer employed by SOL 75 45.7

Do not work with / not employed by SOL 62 38.4

Sub total 163 100

Non-land owner Employed by SOL 66 22.2

No longer employed by SOL 79 27

49

Category Employment Experiences Amount Percentage

Do not work with / not employed by SOL 149 50.9

Sub total 294 100

Total Land owner + Non-land owner 457

Source: USU social survey, 2017

As part of SOL commitments in RP, the affected land owners are prioritized to have

employment opportunities in SOL, its contractors or sub-contractors. The monthly income

is ranged in three and four million rupiah (IDR 3,000,000 – 4,000,000) for unskilled and

semi-skilled workers. This salary income is higher than the Regional minimum wage at

Regency level which amounted to IDR 2,100,000.

Average working duration for skill and semi-skilled workers in the project is from 6 months

– 3 years during 2015 – 2017. The employment opportunities and income generated by

the local labours and also workers from outside of the area residing in the area during the

project construction phase triggered the growth of economic condition in the area. Money

circulation within Pahae area and North Tapanuli region is high and used for purchasing

goods and providing services related with project, resulting in the growth of the

businesses of the local vendors, such as food catering, accommodation/housing rental,

transportation services, travel services, material and equipment supply, etc. There is high

velocity of money and expanding economy, which has helped improve the economic

condition of the communities as a whole. The employment opportunities provided by SOL

helped improve the economic condition not only of the land owners but also local

community as well.

With regard to assisting the most vulnerable group, SOL employed seven (7) people (see

discussion in Section 4.2). SOL is to evaluate the remaining five of most vulnerable who

currently are not employed by SOL to be included in the ongoing and future ISP.

4.4. INTEGRATED SOCIAL PROGRAM

This section elaborates the implementation of ISP since 2015 -2018. ISP was designed

as part of the Project social management plans to address and mitigate the adverse

impacts of Project activities, in particularly related to land acquisition process. Besides,

ISP also contains social activities to enhance the positive benefits of Project and to

establish community development program.

In developing ISP, SOL consulted with key stakeholders such as local communities, in

particularly the IPs, government, education and health services and NGOs. Community

expectations and needs were identified while at the same time communities (IPs)

resources and capacities were observed. SOL recognized that communities’ contribution

would increase the ownership of the program and sustain the implementation.

ISP was intended to be a targeted, effective, community-driven and sustainable program.

To achieve these objectives, a comprehensive planning was prepared.

50

ISP focuses on five main social concerns: agricultural/livelihood restoration,

education,

health,

infrastructure improvement, and

culture, art and religion.

SOL introduced multiple programs and initiatives to ensure the five main social concerns are

equally covered. As part of LRP implementation, ISP also includes program focusing on most

vulnerable group. Targeted beneficiaries include: land owners, non-land owners, women,

children, elderly people and poor families.

Figure 6 shows the general process taken on community development and ISP.

Figure 6 Program Planning Process

ISP activities implementation in 2015 – 2018 are summarized in table 11 below.

Need Analysis of villages

(Juni - Agustus 2014)

•Meeting with stakeholders in Pahae Julu & Pahae Jae

•Study of each village RPJMDes (Village Long Term Development Plan) document

•Coordination with Local Government to syncronize ISP and government programs

•Meeting with stakeholders in the village

Planning and program design

(Sept - Dec 2014)

• Specific programs, targets, budgets and schedules

• Management approval process

Informationa Sharing session

(Jan 2015)

•The community affected

•Local government

•Relevant stakeholders

Implementation

(Feb 2015 -present)

•Coordination with village head, community, local government

•Implementation of the program

•Monitoring and reporting

•Evaluation

51

Tab

le 1

3 S

um

mar

y o

f IS

P i

mp

lem

enta

tio

n in

201

5 –

2018

Fo

cus

Pro

gra

m

Yea

r N

o.

Act

ivit

y

Are

a/V

illa

ges

B

ene

fici

ari

es

T

ota

l U

nit

L

O

No

n-

LO

Ag

ricu

ltu

re/

Liv

elih

oo

d

Res

tora

tio

n

2015

1

Tra

inin

g fo

r org

anic

com

post an

d a

nim

al fe

ed a

nd

assis

tan

ce f

or

1

un

it o

f o

rgan

ic fe

rtili

zer

and a

nim

al fe

ed m

achin

e p

rocessor

to

ea

ch v

illag

e

SIL

& N

IL (

11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

vill

ages

11

11

2

Assis

tan

ce for

PK

K m

em

bers

(un

ifo

rm)

NIL

(S

ima

tania

ri)

wo

men

35

35

2016

3

Drivin

g s

kill

tra

inin

g for

Sim

ata

nia

ri Y

outh

org

an

ization

NIL

(S

imata

nia

ri)

You

th

10

10

4

Ele

ctr

icity in

sta

llatio

n –

skill

tra

inin

g

11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illag

es (

SIL

& N

IL)

You

th

23

23

5

Non

-ric

e m

ate

ria

l cu

lina

ry –

Skill

tra

inin

g

SIL

(6 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

NIL

(5 a

ffecte

d v

illa

ge

s +

2 n

on

affe

cte

d v

illages)

wo

men

65

65

6

Sew

ing -

Skill

tra

inin

g

SIL

(P

ard

om

uan

Na

ing

go

lan)

wo

men

8

8

7

Assis

tan

ce –

coo

kin

g to

ols

fo

r P

KK

gro

up

SIL

(S

ilan

gkitan

g a

nd

S

iguru

ngg

uru

ng)

wo

men

20

20

8

Assis

tan

ce –

pro

vis

ion o

f un

iform

fo

r P

KK

gro

ups

SIL

(S

ilan

gkitan

g,

Pard

om

uan

Na

ing

go

lan

) N

IL (

Lum

ba

n J

ae

an

)

wo

men

20

20

9

Assis

tan

ce for

most vu

lne

rable

la

nd o

wne

rs

SIL

(S

iguru

nggu

rung

, S

ilangkita

ng

)

NIL

(Janji

Nato

gu, S

ibag

an

din

g,

Lum

ba

n J

ae

an

, S

ima

tan

iari

)

Lan

d o

wn

ers

1

7

0

17

2017

Fis

h f

arm

ing

10

Assessm

en

t n

ew

Farm

ers

' gro

ups in fis

h fa

rmin

g a

ctivity

(co

mm

itm

ent,

wo

rk p

lan, econom

ic a

na

lysis

an

d its

lo

ca

tion)

SIL

(P

ard

am

ean

Na

ing

go

lan

and

Pard

om

ua

n N

ain

gg

ola

n)

Fa

rmers

' gro

up

2

2

11

Inte

nsiv

e tra

inin

g fo

r e

ffe

ctive a

nd

effic

ient

fish fa

rmin

g &

dis

trib

utio

n o

f fish

bre

eds, fish fee

d a

nd too

ls/e

qu

ipm

ent.

Farm

ers

’ g

roup

mem

bers

2

5

1

5

3

52

Fo

cus

Pro

gra

m

Yea

r N

o.

Act

ivit

y

Are

a/V

illa

ges

B

ene

fici

ari

es

T

ota

l U

nit

L

O

No

n-

LO

W

om

en

gro

up

12

Assis

tan

ce –

don

ation

of

co

okin

g u

tensils

fo

r w

om

en’s

gro

up

(PK

K)

SIL

(P

ard

om

uan

Na

ing

go

lan)

NIL

(O

nan

Hasa

ng

) w

om

en

40

40

2018

Pig

Gro

win

g &

Pig

Bre

edin

g

13

Assessm

en

t n

ew

Farm

ers

' gro

ups in p

ig g

row

ing a

ctivity

(econom

ic a

naly

sis

and

its

loca

tio

n)

SIL

(S

iguru

ng

-guru

ng,

Pard

am

ea

n N

ain

gg

ola

n)

NIL

(S

imata

nia

ri, Lum

ban

Ja

ean,

Sito

lu O

mpu

, O

na

ng

Ha

sa

ng

)

Fa

rmers

' gro

up

6

6

14

Tra

inin

g o

n p

ig f

arm

ing

an

d p

ig b

reedin

g, d

istr

ibu

tion

of pig

lets

an

d s

win

e, m

edic

ines, co

rn s

eed

s a

nd

pig

fee

d

Farm

ers

’ g

roup

me

mb

er

52

86

138

Du

ck

Far

min

g

15

Assessm

en

t n

ew

Farm

ers

' gro

up in d

uck fa

rmin

g a

ctivity

(co

mm

itm

ent

and w

ork

pla

n, econ

om

ic a

naly

sis

and its

location)

NIL

(O

nan

Hasa

ng

) F

arm

ers

' gro

up

1

1

16

Tra

inin

g o

n d

uck fa

rmin

g (

duck e

gg p

roduction

), d

istr

ibutio

n o

f du

cks, m

edic

ines, veg

eta

ble

s s

eed, a

nd

pig

fe

ed

, m

onito

rin

g

Farm

ers

’ g

roup

mem

bers

2

10

12

Cro

p D

ive

rsif

ica

tio

n

17

Assessm

en

t n

ew

Farm

ers

' gro

ups in c

rop d

ive

rsific

ation

activity

(co

mm

itm

ent

and w

ork

pla

n, econ

om

ic a

naly

sis

and its

location)

NIL

(Janji

Nato

gu)

Fa

rmers

' gro

up

1

1

18

Tra

inin

g o

n c

rop d

ive

rsific

ation, d

istr

ibu

tion

of vegeta

ble

se

eds,

fert

ilize

r, p

esticid

es a

nd

sp

rayers

and

monito

ring

Farm

ers

’ g

roup

mem

bers

2

5

7

Mic

ro-c

red

it

19

Assessm

en

t n

ew

wom

en' g

roup in

mic

ro c

redit o

n m

em

be

rs

com

mitm

ent a

nd

wo

rkpla

n in r

un

nin

g m

icro

cre

dit a

ctivity

NIL

(Janji

Nato

gu)

Fa

rmers

' gro

up

1

1

20

Tra

inin

g o

n f

ina

ncia

l m

an

ag

em

ent an

d b

ookkee

pin

g, dis

trib

utio

n o

f re

volv

ing

fund

assis

tance a

nd

monito

rin

g

Farm

ers

’ g

roup

me

mb

er

8

19

27

Bak

ery

21

Assessm

en

t n

ew

yo

uth

-girls

' gro

up in b

akery

makin

g a

ctivity

(co

mm

itm

ent,

wo

rkpla

n,

eco

nom

ic a

naly

sis

and its

mark

et

po

ten

tia

l)

SIL

(S

ilan

gkitan

g a

nd

S

iguru

ngg

uru

ng)

Wom

en y

ou

th

gro

up

1

1

53

Fo

cus

Pro

gra

m

Yea

r N

o.

Act

ivit

y

Are

a/V

illa

ges

B

ene

fici

ari

es

T

ota

l U

nit

L

O

No

n-

LO

22

Tra

inin

g o

n b

akery

and

pa

str

y m

akin

g, dis

trib

utio

n o

f bakery

in

gre

die

nts

, to

ols

, a

nd

sta

rter

fund

assis

tan

ce a

nd m

onito

ring

Wom

en y

ou

th

gro

up m

em

be

rs

3

5

8

Han

dic

raft

36

Assessm

en

t n

ew

wom

en' g

roup in

han

dic

raft

makin

g a

ctivity

(co

mm

itm

ent,

wo

rkpla

n,

eco

nom

ic a

naly

sis

and its

mark

et

po

ten

tia

l)

NIL

(S

ibaga

ndin

g)

Wom

en

1

1

37

Dis

trib

utio

n o

f m

ate

rials

an

d too

ls a

ssis

tance

3

7

7

38

Mo

nitoring

on

han

dic

raft

makin

g a

ctivity

Fis

h f

arm

ing

39

Dis

trib

utio

n o

f fe

ed f

ish for

fish b

reedin

g a

ctivity

SIL

(P

ard

om

uan

Na

ing

go

lan

and

Pard

am

ea

n N

ain

gg

ola

n)

Fa

rmers

' gro

up

2

2

40

Dis

trib

utio

n o

f fe

ed m

akin

g m

achin

e

41

Pote

ntial m

ark

et ana

lysis

& b

uild

ing

mark

eting

netw

ork

with F

ish

O

ffic

e o

f N

ort

h T

apan

uli

dis

tric

t in

fis

h b

reedin

g a

ctivity

Farm

ers

’ g

roup

mem

bers

2

51

53

42

Fir

st ha

rve

st in

fis

h f

arm

ing

Ed

uca

tio

n

2015

-

2018

1

Eng

lish c

ou

rse for

ele

men

tary

scho

ol an

d junio

r hig

h s

ch

ool

stu

de

nts

S

IL (

10

ele

men

tary

scho

ols

and

2 junio

r hig

h s

ch

ool)

stu

den

ts

75

0

750

2

Assis

tan

ce for

stu

den

ts w

ith b

est achie

ve

men

ts

Paha

e J

ae &

Pa

hae J

ulu

Sub

-dis

tric

ts

stu

den

ts

92

1

921

3

Rep

air

of S

D J

an

ji N

ato

gu

– c

eili

ngs, ch

air

s a

nd

cla

ss p

art

itio

n

NIL

(Janji

Nato

gu)

stu

de

nts

&

teach

ers

85

85

4

Evalu

ation

mee

ting

on E

nglis

h c

ou

rse w

ith E

ducation O

ffic

e in

Sub

-dis

tric

t and

Co

urs

e Im

ple

men

ter

SIL

& N

IL

Head

maste

rs a

nd

SO

L C

SR

te

am

34

34

2016

5

Assis

tan

ce for

two s

cho

ols

(S

MP

N 3

Pah

ae

Ju

lu a

nd S

D Inpre

s

Jan

ji N

ato

gu

) –

mate

rial fo

r re

pa

inting

th

e s

choo

l build

ing

NIL

(Lum

ba

n J

ae

an

an

d J

anji

Na

togu

) stu

de

nts

&

teach

ers

43

0

430

2017

6

Rep

air

of 2

5 u

nits d

esks –

Lum

ba

n J

ae

an

Ele

me

nta

ry s

choo

ls

NIL

(Lum

ba

n J

ae

an

) stu

de

nts

&

teach

ers

25

0

250

7

Assis

tan

ce for

the r

epa

ir o

f bro

ke

n d

esks ±

20-u

nit d

esks

NIL

(H

uta

bara

t)

stu

de

nts

&

teach

ers

12

0

120

2018

8

Dis

trib

utio

n o

f scho

lars

hip

for

un

ive

rsity s

tud

en

ts

SIL

& N

IL (

11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

un

ive

rsity

stu

den

ts

4

6

10

9

Ceili

ng r

epa

ir for

1 c

lass r

oom

in S

D J

anji

Nato

gu

Ja

nji

Nato

gu

stu

den

ts

95

95

54

Fo

cus

Pro

gra

m

Yea

r N

o.

Act

ivit

y

Are

a/V

illa

ges

B

ene

fici

ari

es

T

ota

l U

nit

L

O

No

n-

LO

10

Inte

rnsh

ip -

socio

log

y s

tud

en

ts o

f N

ort

h S

um

ate

ra U

niv

ers

ity

No

rth T

apa

nuli

un

ive

rsity

stu

den

ts

14

14

11

Assis

tan

ce-

dis

trib

ution

of cem

en

t (4

tons)

to S

MP

N 2

Pu

rba T

ua

to c

on

str

uct d

rain

age

Purb

atu

a S

ub

-dis

tric

t stu

den

ts

27

0

270

12

Dis

trib

utio

n o

f E

nglis

h d

ictio

nary

(jo

int effo

rt w

ith

Halli

bu

rton)

SIL

& N

IL

stu

den

ts

75

0

750

13

Dis

trib

utio

n o

f d

esks a

nd

table

s t

o t

wo e

lem

en

tary

schools

N

IL (

Sim

ata

nia

ri)

SIL

(P

ard

am

ean

Na

ing

go

lan)

stu

den

ts

22

6

226

14

Dis

trib

utio

n o

f D

eskto

p o

f Ju

nio

r H

igh

scho

ol M

Ts A

l F

alla

h 2

units

de

skto

ps a

nd 1

unit s

erv

er

T

aru

tun

g

stu

den

ts

65

65

Hea

lth

2015

-

2018

1

Assis

tan

ce for

Posya

nd

u L

an

sia

/ eld

erly a

ctivity (

vitam

in a

nd

nu

trio

us fo

od

)

SIL

& N

IL (

11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

Eld

erly p

eo

ple

24

6

246

2015

-

2017

2

Con

tin

ua

tion

of a

ssis

tance for

str

eng

thenin

g P

osyandu

Balit

a/

un

de

r-5 c

hild

ren a

ctivity (

vitam

ins a

nd n

utr

itio

na

l fo

od)

SIL

& N

IL (

11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

und

er-

5 c

hild

ren

45

0

450

2017

3

Assis

tan

ce for

Posya

nd

u L

an

sia

– p

rovis

ion

of 2

un

its o

f ta

pe f

or

“Se

na

m P

osyandu

La

nsia

” activity

Sim

ata

nia

ri a

nd J

an

ji N

ato

gu

Eld

erly p

eople

65

65

4

Assis

tan

ce for

Posya

nd

u L

an

sia

mem

be

rs –

dis

trib

ution

of

un

ifo

rm

for

“Sen

am

la

nsia

” activity

SIL

& N

IL (

11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

Eld

erly p

eople

24

6

246

5

Fre

e m

ed

ica

tion

S

IL &

NIL

(11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

co

mm

unitie

s

2,7

84

2,7

84

2018

6

Me

dic

al che

ck-u

p (

Cho

leste

rol, d

iabe

tic,

urid a

cid

) fo

r e

lde

rly

pe

op

le

SIL

& N

IL (

11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

Eld

erly p

eo

ple

24

6

246

7

Con

str

uction

of com

mu

nal se

ptic ta

nk

NIL

(S

imata

nia

ri)

hou

seh

old

s

49

49

8

He

alth s

em

ina

r o

n H

ypert

ensio

n &

Dia

betic (

NIL

are

a)

&T

ube

rculo

sis

(S

IL a

rea

) att

ende

d b

y 1

05 H

ealth c

ad

res

SIL

& N

IL (

11 a

ffe

cte

d v

illages)

posyan

du

ca

dre

s

10

5

105

9

Assis

tan

ce to d

isable

d p

ers

ons (

whe

elc

ha

irs,

wa

lkin

g a

id,

and

nu

tritio

us food

)

SIL

& N

IL (

11

affe

cte

d v

illages)

dis

able

d p

ers

ons

43

43

Infr

astr

uct

ure

Im

pro

vem

ent

2015

1

Impro

vem

en

t o

f w

ood

en

bridge

(R

am

bin

g B

ari

ng

in)

- access to

fa

rmin

g a

rea

s.

Sig

uru

ng-g

uru

ng

Farm

ers

± 1

58

± 1

58

2

Rep

air

of d

am

aged

irr

igation b

ody (

Am

bar)

P

ard

am

ea

n N

ain

gg

ola

n

Farm

ers

± 1

38

± 1

38

55

Fo

cus

Pro

gra

m

Yea

r N

o.

Act

ivit

y

Are

a/V

illa

ges

B

ene

fici

ari

es

T

ota

l U

nit

L

O

No

n-

LO

3

Incre

ase

th

e c

lea

n w

ate

r dis

cha

rge s

upply

P

ard

om

ua

n N

ain

gg

ola

n

hou

seh

old

s

±21

8

±218

4

Impro

vem

en

t o

f path

way to S

D (

Pri

mary

Sch

oo

l) a

t S

i R

ia-R

ia S

ub

Vill

ag

e.

Sio

pa

t B

ahal

hou

seh

old

s

± 9

8

± 9

8

5

Impro

vem

en

t o

f ir

rig

atio

n d

rain

ag

e a

t P

an

dahana

n S

ira s

ub

vill

age

Sila

ngkita

ng

Farm

ers

± 9

3

± 9

3

6

Impro

vem

en

t o

f dam

ag

ed

acce

ss r

oa

d to the v

illag

e:

8 s

eve

re

po

ints

Sito

lu O

mpu

co

mm

unitie

s

± 1

57

± 1

57

2016

7

Cle

an w

ate

r pip

ing

su

pply

S

imata

nia

ri

hou

seh

old

s

± 1

08

± 1

08

8

Impro

vem

en

t o

f A

ek S

aba

-Saba

irr

igatio

n c

hann

el

Ja

nji

Nato

gu

hou

seh

old

s

± 1

13

± 1

13

9

Cle

an w

ate

r pip

ing

and

co

nstr

uctio

n o

f 2 u

nits o

f pe

rman

en

t/con

cre

te w

ate

r ta

nk a

t th

e v

illage

Lum

ba

n J

ae

an

hou

seh

old

s

±11

2

±1

12

10

Cle

an w

ate

r pip

ing

and

co

nstr

uctio

n o

f 2 u

nits o

f pe

rman

en

t/con

cre

te w

ate

r ta

nk

Sib

ag

an

din

g

hou

seh

old

s

± 1

03

± 1

03

11

Rep

air

of p

ad

dy f

ield

co

ncre

te irr

iga

tion c

hann

el (±

20 m

) P

ard

om

ua

n N

ain

gg

ola

n

Farm

ers

± 1

02

± 1

02

12

Rep

air

of p

ad

dy f

ield

co

ncre

te irr

iga

tion c

hann

el (±

100 m

) P

ard

am

ea

n N

ain

gg

ola

n

Farm

ers

± 7

8

± 7

8

13

Impro

vem

en

t o

f vill

age a

ccess r

oa

d (

5 p

oin

ts)

Sito

lu O

mpu

co

mm

unitie

s

± 6

36

± 6

36

14

Insta

llatio

n o

f 2 u

nits o

f str

eet lig

ht

Pard

om

ua

n N

ain

gg

ola

n

co

mm

unitie

s

± 1

04

6

± 1

046

2017

15

Assis

tan

ce to r

epa

ir s

om

e d

am

aged f

acili

ties a

t S

imata

nia

ri

Ele

men

tary

Scho

ol (S

D)

Sim

ata

nia

ri

stu

den

ts

± 8

5

± 8

5

16

Assis

tan

ce for

the im

pro

vem

ent

of en

tran

ce

access a

t P

uske

sm

as

Pah

ae

Ju

lu (

NIL

) S

ub

dis

tric

t

On

an H

asa

ng

(N

IL)

Loca

l co

mm

unitie

s

Local co

mm

unitie

s in

Pa

hae

Ju

lu s

ub

dis

tric

t

56

Fo

cus

Pro

gra

m

Yea

r N

o.

Act

ivit

y

Are

a/V

illa

ges

B

ene

fici

ari

es

T

ota

l U

nit

L

O

No

n-

LO

17

Assis

tan

ce to r

epa

ir d

oo

rs a

nd b

uild

ing r

epain

tin

g o

f ele

me

nta

ry

schoo

l S

ibag

an

din

g

stu

den

ts

19

7

197

18

Rep

air

of b

rid

ge

in H

uta

Dangir s

ub v

illage

Sila

ngkita

ng

co

mm

unitie

s

± 1

13

± 1

13

19

Cle

an w

ate

r pip

ing

and

co

nstr

uctio

n o

f pe

rmanen

t/concre

te w

ate

r ta

nk a

t th

e s

ourc

e a

nd a

t th

e v

illage

S

iguru

ng-g

uru

ng

hou

seh

old

s

± 8

3

± 8

3

20

Cle

an w

ate

r pip

ing

and

co

nstr

uctio

n o

f pe

rmanen

t/concre

te w

ate

r ta

nk a

t th

e s

ourc

e a

nd a

t th

e v

illage

S

iOp

at B

aha

l hou

seh

old

s

± 1

33

± 1

33

21

Cle

an w

ate

r pip

ing

fo

r tw

o e

lem

en

tary

schoo

ls in S

IL a

rea

Sila

ngkita

ng &

Sig

uru

ng-g

uru

ng

stu

den

ts

± 2

53

± 2

53

2018

22

Rep

air

of access r

oa

d t

o H

uta

julu

sub

vill

age

(± 2

00

m)

Sim

ata

nia

ri

hou

seh

old

s

± 3

5

± 3

5

23

Rep

air

of access r

oa

d t

o L

iang S

ing

a s

ub

vill

age (

± 2

00 m

) P

ard

om

ua

n N

ain

gg

ola

n

hou

seh

old

s

± 3

0

± 3

0

24

Cle

an w

ate

r pip

ing

in

Janji

Nato

gu

vill

ag

e (

± 2

,5 k

m)

Ja

nji

Nato

gu

hou

seh

old

s

± 1

50

± 1

50

Cu

ltu

re,

Art

&

Rel

igio

n

2015

-

2019

1

Don

ation

- C

hristm

as c

ele

bra

tio

n e

ve

nts

, M

osqu

es a

nd r

elig

ious

eve

nts

/ a

ctivitie

s

Paha

e J

ae, P

ahae J

ulu

, S

imangu

mba

n,

Purb

a T

ua S

ub

-dis

tric

ts

Local co

mm

unitie

s,

Churc

he

s, M

osq

ues

2

Don

ation

/co

ntr

ibu

tio

n o

n C

onstr

uction o

f chu

rch

es a

nd m

osque

s

SIL

& N

IL

C

hu

rch

es &

Mosqu

es

3

Don

ation

/co

ntr

ibu

tio

n o

n local co

mm

unitie

s’ activitie

s &

pro

posa

ls

rela

ted w

ith n

atio

na

l an

d local e

vents

Paha

e J

ae, P

ahae J

ulu

, S

imangu

mba

n,

Purb

a T

ua S

ub

dis

tric

ts &

No

rth

Tap

an

uli

Dis

tric

t

Local co

mm

unitie

s’ org

aniz

atio

ns, Lo

ca

l com

munitie

s

4

Don

ation

/co

ntr

ibu

tio

n for

Bata

k d

ance “

Tort

or

Tum

ba”

festiva

l in

P

ah

ae

are

a in

20

16

4 s

ub d

istr

icts

(P

ahae J

ulu

, P

aha

e J

ae, S

iman

gu

mba

n,

Purb

a T

ua)

5

Don

ation

/co

ntr

ibu

tio

n o

n F

estival of

Bata

k C

ultu

re &

Ulo

s e

ve

nt

in

Nort

h T

ap

an

uli

in 2

01

8

No

rth T

apa

nuli

Dis

tric

t

Lo

cal C

om

munitie

s

57

Detailed ISP implementation

a. Agricultural and Livelihood Restoration

In 2015 -2016, program implemented under the agricultural and livelihood restoration

involved 11 villages and included agricultural training for organic composting and animal

feed processing, women skill training (sewing and culinary), driving skill and electrical

installation training for youth groups.

In the second semester of 2017 - 2018, the focus was to develop farmers’ groups in the

affected villages with the following activities:

Table 14 Farmers' groups and type of activities

No Type of activities Farmers

Group Area/Villages

1 Pig breeding/growing 8

SIL: Silangkitang, Sigurung-gurung (2

groups), Pardamean Nainggolan, Sitolu

Ompu

NIL: Simataniari, Lumban Jaean, Onan

Hasang

2 Fish farming/breeding 2 Pardamean Nainggolan

3 Crop diversification 1 Janji Natogu

4 Women’s group Micro credit 1 Janji Natogu

5 Pastry/bakery making (female

youth group) 1 Silangkitang

6 Handy craft making 1 Sibaganding

Total 15

During 2017-2018, there were 15 farmers’ groups assisted by SOL. The assistance includes

intensive training, livestock breeds, seedlings, materials and tools, marketing network analysis

and facilitation.

Out of 15 farmer groups, 2 groups of fish farming succeeded and gained income from the

activity. These 2 groups further continued the program with very minimum reliance on SOL

because they were appropriately equipped with fish feed machine to minimize expense. The

livelihood of the group members was found improved.

SOL also facilitated the groups to sustainably cooperate with the North Tapanuli Fishery

Office. Despite of the achievement, SOL continues monitoring these two groups and making

them as a model for other groups (both existing and new groups).

The remaining livelihood restoration programs such as pig breeding and growing, crop

diversification, women’s micro credit group and youth pastry group are being monitored and

will be evaluated by end of 2019.

Table 15 summarizes the number of land owners involved in the activities under the

agricultural and livelihood restoration program.

58

Table 15 Agricultural and livelihood restoration activities with number of land owners and non- land owners

No. Group Name Village Women Men Total of

Member

Land

Owner

1 Maju Ikan Lestari Pardamean Nainggolan 10 0 10 0

2 Maju Jaya Pardomuan Nainggolan 4 0 4 2

3 Sitolu Ompu Sitolu Ompu 19 1 20 0

4 Ranto Panjang Pardamean Nainggolan 10 2 12 12

5 Muda Mandiri Sigurunggurung 18 1 19 2

6 Beta Maju Silangkitang 20 4 24 17

7 IMSS - Bakery Silangkitang-Sigurunggurung 0 7 7 3

8 Ramosdo Sigurunggurung 1 32 33 0

9 Dos Roha Simataniari 1 25 26 15

10 Lumban Jaean Lumban Jaean 0 31 31 25

11 Makmur Onan Hasang 8 0 8 2

12 Sinur Onan Hasang 7 0 7 0

13 UP2K Janji Natogu 0 26 26 8

14 Diversifikasi Tanaman Janji Natogu 0 7 7 2

15 Keranjinan Tangan Sibaganding 0 8 8 3

Total 98 144 242 91

Figure 7 Fish farming initial harvest in Pardamean Nainggolan village

59

b. Education

Three major programs implemented for education to date include:

1. Free English course

There were about 750 students (elementary and junior high school) from 11 affected

villages in SIL & NIL participated in this program. The program has been running since

2015. SOL engaged an English course institution for this program. The course was

conducted twice a week in 12 locations. Positive feedback was coming across from

the students and the teachers in the last three years. The program was closely

monitored and evaluation at semi-annual basis was conducted involving the schools,

the English course institution and SOL’s team. Given the positive impacts and the

coverage of program, SOL keeps this as an annual program in the ongoing ISP while

conducting evaluation to improve the program.

2. Scholarship for university students

In 2018, SOL started a scholarship program and distributed assistance to 10 selected

university students with best achievement from poor family. Out of 10 students, 5 are

children of land owners. Two students graduated this year (2019) and the other eight

will be evaluated based on the study result whether the scholarship be continued the

following year.

3. Assistances for schools in affected villages to include supplies such as desks and

repair of damaged school facilities. The assistance was implemented based on

assessment and in coordination with the Local Government to avoid overlapping with

any similar government program.

c. Health

Health program implemented in 2015 - 2018 targeted the vulnerable groups such as elderly

people, women and poor households. The program covered distribution of vitamins and

additional nutritional food for elderly (in 11 villages) by village midwives. There were ± 250

elderly people participated in the program on a regular basis (weekly or monthly) depending

on the village schedule.

SOL also distributed assistance for construction of communal septic tank in Simataniari

village (involving 49 poor households). This program was conducted in cooperation with

the Health Office of Pahae Julu district. The village is now rated to have 100% coverage of

household with septic tank by the District Health Office.

Other program was free medication “Pengobatan Gratis” in 11 affected villages as defined

in IPP. The program was conducted in 2017 and will be repeated in 2019.

d. Infrastructure improvement

Main activities in infrastructure improvement are presented in Table 16.

60

Table 16 Infrastructure Improvement Program (2015-2018)

No Type of infrastructure Village Coverage

1 Clean water piping Simataniari, Lumban Jaean,

Sibaganding, Sigurung-gurung,

SiOpat Bahal, Janji Natogu,

70%–100% household in

the village, 560 – 801

households.

2 Irrigation Silangkitang, Pardamean

Nainggolan, Pardomuan

Nainggolan, Janji Natogu

30 %-70% farmers in the

village, 24– 58 farmers

3 Bridge Silangkitang, Sigurung-gurung 40% - 70% household in

the village, 141– 247

households

4 Access road to sub village Simataniari, Pardomuan

Nainggolan, Sitolu Ompu,

20%- 50% household in

the village, 103 – 259

households

All of the above activities were selected based on priorities and had been consulted with

head of villages and the local government. SOL also conducted prior assessment to ensure

that no overlap with government program.

The infrastructure improvement program gave positive impacts to the village, especially the

clean water piping, as it helps increasing clean water supply to the village. In this regard,

the program also supported the improvement of sanitation and health condition of local

Indigenous communities. Figure 8 shows sample of program activities in photographs.

Figure 8 Clean water piping in Lumban Jaean village, 2016

61

e. Religious, Art and Culture

During 2015-2018 the program covered:

Donation and contribution to support local communities’ social and cultural

events/festivals at the village, district and regency level.

Support for churches’ and mosques’ activities surrounding the Project areas; such as

Christmas celebration and Moslem’s festive.

Support and donation for Batak art and culture such as Batak ethnic instrument festival

and other programs proposed by local communities.

ISP implementation was closely monitored through community consultations and direct

observation. SOL regularly reported the ISP monitoring result to ADB.

Appendix C and Appendix D present the summary of ISP implementation across five main

concerns covering the short and mid-term.

4.5. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGAMENT

This sub section focuses on the implemented activities related to stakeholder engagement.

Stakeholder engagement is an important part of the social management plan and SOL has

been intensively conducted the engagement with project related stakeholders since the start

of the project.

Activities carried out on stakeholder engagement throughout the early stage of the project to

date are explained in the following sections.

4.5.1. Identification of Stakeholders

Stakeholders are defined as people or entities that are affected or may have interest in

the Project. SOL identified the key stakeholders through a stakeholder analysis process

at the beginning of the Project. The key stakeholders directly affected by the Project

activities were:

Project affected communities

Village heads from six villages in Pahae Jae district

Village heads from five villages in Pahae Julu district

Representatives of Local Government (sub district and regency)

Community leaders from eleven villages

Religious leaders from eleven villages

Youth leaders from eleven villages

4.5.2. Stakeholder Consultation

To date SOL has undertaken consultation in a culturally sensitive manner using both

Indonesian and Batak languages to conduct meetings with all the Project affected

communities. Consultation activities were conducted, where possible, in a venue closest

to the local communities.

62

Meeting participants consisted of Batak men, women and youth who were given equal

opportunities to voice their concerns and expectations during the question and answer

sessions. SOL has maintained the stakeholder’s engagement through close

communication with the villagers and coordination with the local governments and

contractors. ER Team conducted village monthly meeting to collect community aspirations

and feedback against the program implementation. Other than that, ER Team also initiated

coordination meeting with main contractors or sub-contractors to discuss communities’

concerns related to project construction and conducted ad-hoc meeting coordination with

related government agencies.

Table 17 presents the community participation in village monthly meeting over 2015 - 2018.

Table 17 Community Participation in Village Meeting 2015 – 2018

No Village

Village Monthly Meeting Attendance/Year based on Gender

2015 2016 2017 2018

Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female

1 Silangkitang 121 80 13 21 38 31 0 0

2 Sigurung-gurung 134 45 20 22 27 16 24 10

3 Pardamean Nainggolan

81 45 31 85 60 38 12 3

4 Pardomuan Nainggolan

103 96 36 31 92 49 44 14

5 Siopat Bahal 34 33 21 5 34 19 50 24

6 Sitolu Ompu 54 4 11 2 53 12 18 2

7 Simataniari 163 137 13 5 31 20 25 3

8 Lumban Jaean 71 70 8 20 14 13 0 0

9 Sibaganding 142 81 31 60 25 22 12 5

10 Onan Hasang 51 88 7 41 26 24 43 27

11 Janji Natogu 62 42 49 30 101 70 81 22

Total 1,016 721 240 322 501 314 309 110

Source: SOL Data, 2019

Appendix E shows the summary of consultation and socialization conducted by SOL

related to land acquisition process in 2015–2018.

4.5.3. Women Participation

SOL promoted gender empowerment through the LRP implementation and various

engagement. Women were encouraged to voice up concerns and were asked to

participate in meetings and program implementation.

63

SOL gave priorities to female headed household (among elderly and household with

disabled person) to enhance their livelihoods. LRP provided some benefits for women as

they can participate through livestock raising opportunity, crop diversification and micro

credit support. Women empowerment also took place in the facilitation of Family Welfare

Empowerment (PKK) program in each affected village.

Figure 9 and 10 show female participation in LRP implementation program based on SOL

ISP/CSR data 2019.

Figure 9 Female Participation in LRP Implementation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3328

8

0 0

12

0

91

0 0

27

7

0

7

Male Female

64

Figure 10 Female Participation in LRP (Percentage)

The data shows that women participation in the LRP activities is 62% and it is higher than

men’s involvement. Two main activities where women participation is high are pig farming

and micro credit. This is because pig farming in the affected villages is mainly done by

women who are considered generally more patient than men in treating the pigs and

maintaining the activities. They greatly value pig farming as part of their investment most

relevant to their cultural context, especially because pig is traditionally always required in

any big or small Batak cultural events or feasts. The market value for pig is quite high

because while the demand is considered high in North Tapanuli area, most of the supply

comes from other areas. Therefore, when the program was introduced and socialized,

there were many women interested in taking part.

For employment, women were provided equal opportunity to take part in the project. Figure

5 in section 4.3 shows that during the construction period 2014 - 2018, woman comprised

30% - 68% of the total unskilled labour for services.

Given this percentage, number of female workers during the construction phase has met

the committed development indicator, which states that women comprise at least 30% of

the total unskilled labour for services during construction phase in 2014-2018 (ref. section

4.3).

4.6. DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION

This sub-section will focus on the Information Disclosure activities conducted by SOL.

ADB SPS states that consultation and participation are central to the achievement of the

objective. In this regard, SOL was required to ensure that all relevant information related

to Project would be shared with the affected people and communicated to stakeholders.

SOL conducted activities to disclose project information, including LRP activities, to the

local communities and related stakeholders since the beginning of the project construction

activities using various forms.

To disclose information about project activities, SOL also used the following forms:

direct communication:

38%

62%Male

Female

65

1. verbal face to face communication on informal and formal meetings with key

stakeholders

2. Village monthly meeting – started in 2015 to date.

indirect communication- notification through the establishment of Information

Education Consultation (IEC) materials

The IEC materials were prepared in the form of brochures/leaflets, location maps,

information boards, pictures/photos and video presentations. These materials were found

to be:

culturally appropriate and effective: the materials were presented in a language

understood by the local communities (Indonesian and Batak language)

clear and understood by the communities: materials were presented in a simple

structured format

placed at location easily accessible to the affected people and general public

For example, during the land acquisition process; the IEC material covered the following

terms:

Measurement of losses

Detailed asset valuations

Entitlements and special allowance for income restoration

Grievance procedures

Timing of payment

Displacement schedule

SOL conducted intensive communication with key stakeholders along Project stages.

Appendix F shows the multiple communication media established by SOL.

Appendix G describes the consultation and participation meeting conducted by SOL to

disseminate information related to RP and LRP over the years.

4.7. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

At the time of the review, there is no outstanding issue related to compensation and land

acquisition. SOL established a timely and effective Grievance Mechanism at the early

stage of the project that includes clear steps to redress potential issues, dispute and

complaints from community. Grievances were flagged up through verbal or written

channels such as:

by mail addressed directly to SOL;

through village apparatus who then submitted to SOL;

through the ER team members who also lived in the affected villages;

village monthly meetings.

Hotline number

66

SOL grievance mechanism is presented in Figure 11. All process was well followed and

implemented.

Figure 11 SOL Grievance Redress Mechanism

With regards to resolving concerns related to land acquisition, SOL set the priority on the

following order:

First priority: grievances directly affecting Project development, such as

grievance concerning land plots within Project site

Second priority: grievances related to significant impacts on the community

Third priority: grievances with insufficient or unclear evidence or

documentation that require clarification and further investigation

Fourth priority: grievances with no supporting evidence or documentation

In 2015, SOL created a grievance log to document and monitor all the grievances reported

by local communities or related stakeholders. The grievance log recorded all the

submitted grievances and process of the settlement up to the close out status. Update on

67

the status of grievances was also reported in the SSMR submitted to ADB every

semester.

Types of grievances recorded in the log are categorized as follows:

1. Environment: Grievances related to impact of project activities during construction

such as dust, siltation, landslide, water overflow, noise, etc.

2. Social: Community grievances on matters such as request for access to communities’

plantation area, contractors’ and sub contractors’ issue with local vendors, etc.

3. Labor: Grievances raised mainly regarding issues on labor within contractors and sub-

contractors such as salary payment, contract, job vacancy, etc.

It was confirmed that there was no unresolved or outstanding grievance related to land

acquisition or resettlement plan. Figure 12 shows the grievance log in 2015 – 2018.

Figure 12 SOL Grievance Log 2015 – 2018

Overall, during 2015-2018, the grievance mechanism was implemented and managed well

by the Project. Procedure on the grievance mechanism was followed and implemented

carefully in handling the grievances received by the project. Nevertheless, based on social

survey result conducted by USU, there were issues related to the delays in the settlement

of some of the grievances particularly for cases related to the impact of Project

construction activities involving the contractors and sub-contractors. It was revealed that

more time was required for coordination and decision making requiring technical solution

which involved not only SOL, but also the contractors or sub- contractors.

It is acknowledged that individual complainant may have different standard of satisfaction

and a high level of expectation towards SOL. With regard to the satisfaction of

complainants to the solution provided, SOL appeared to make its best effort to respond

and offer most feasible solution based on the agreement with the complainants. The

solutions being offered mostly based on the technical justification and analysis.

202

28

7

0

50

100

150

200

250

Environment Social Labor

Grievance Type

68

5. MONITORING PROCESS

Monitoring provides the basis to assess the overall success of the land acquisition

program, resettlement and livelihood restoration plan. Monitoring is also useful to measure

the effectiveness of various processes. To get a balanced result, monitoring mechanism

is based on both internal and external monitoring, these two processes run simultaneously.

5.1. INTERNAL MONITORING

The internal monitoring process on social program activities was made part of daily

activities of the CSR and ER Team. The internal monitoring was intrinsically linked to the

progress of overall social management plan covering ISP implementation including LRP,

stakeholder engagement and grievance redress mechanism.

The SOL ER & CSR team at site followed and implemented the monitoring procedures.

They collected information through regular visits (monthly and quarterly basis), village

meeting (monthly basis) and grievance monitoring (daily basis).

The internal monitoring reports were prepared by SOL CSR & ER team led by the

responsible manager. The monitoring reports were submitted to multiple concerned

parties such as:

ADB- every semester via the SSMR

Local government- every semester and annual basis

PGE- Quarterly

Appendix H shows sample of monitoring reports submitted to concerned parties.

5.2. EXTERNAL MONITORING

In addition to the internal monitoring process, an assessment conducted by external

expert is beneficial to give independent observation and measurement against the

program implementation. The external monitoring for the Project was undertaken by:

1. Lenders: ADB, JBIC, EPFIs

2. Lenders Environmental and Social Consultant (LESC)

3. PT PGE

4. EBTKE

5. North Tapanuli Local government (PEMDA)

Other than that, SOL also received spot checks from related regulators such as the Local

Parliament (North Tapanuli and Provincial DPRD). Although not all external parties issued

official reports or memorandum following the spot checks, SOL usually received verbal

feedback or comments that triggered immediate corrective actions. Appendix I presents

the spot checks in 2015 – 2018.

RP 2015 indicates that the external monitoring needs to focus on the assessment of

compliance with social commitments contained in Indonesian legislation and applicable

69

international standards. The external monitor is to carry out a socio-economic survey

every two years from the start date of RP implementation and base the assessment on:

Process indicators, to measure the effectiveness of process and identify areas of

improvements

Outcome indicators, to assess the effectiveness of RP/LRP and changes occurred

to communities’ standard of living

SOL engaged USU to conduct the external monitor in 2017. The socio-economic survey

results are taken into account during the preparation and establishment of this RCR.

As part of the external monitoring activity, ADB has been conducting regular visit since

2013 -to date to monitor the implementation of environmental and social safeguards as

committed by SOL. Table 18 shows monitoring activity carried out by ADB team in 2013-

1st semester 2019.

70

T

able

18

AD

B E

nvi

ron

men

tal &

So

cial

Tea

m S

ite

Vis

it

in 2

015

-201

9

No

D

ate

A

DB

Socia

l te

am

H

igh

lights

of m

on

itori

ng r

esult

Impro

ve

me

nt

in t

he

im

ple

me

nta

tio

n

1

5th -

9th M

ay 2

013

In

dira

Sim

bolo

n,

Jo

yce M

unsa

yac,

Marife

P,

ER

M (

Ad

is N

. R

)

As p

art

of th

e p

rep

ara

tion

fo

r th

e s

tart

ing o

f th

e

Pro

ject, S

OL

was r

eq

uire

d t

o:

1.

To

accom

mo

da

te a

nd r

esp

onde

d t

o A

DB

’s

inp

uts

and

com

ments

in

the f

inaliz

ation

of

socia

l d

ocum

enta

tio

n

requ

ire

me

nt

for

the

Pro

ject

wh

ich w

as c

onsis

ted o

f S

SC

AR

, R

P

& IP

P.

2.

To

con

duct

socia

lization o

n P

roje

ct

activity

inclu

din

g

lan

d

acqu

isitio

n

&

gri

evance

me

cha

nis

m

to

land

ow

ne

rs

an

d

local

com

mu

nitie

s in th

e a

ffecte

d v

illa

ges.

1.

Re

qu

ired

socia

l do

cu

men

tations h

ad

add

ressed

the in

puts

an

d c

om

ments

fro

m

the m

issio

n. A

ll docu

men

ts h

ad b

ee

n

su

bm

itte

d a

nd

ap

pro

ved b

y A

DB

.

2.

Socia

lizatio

n h

ad b

ee

n c

on

du

cte

d a

s

require

d b

y A

DB

an

d it

has b

een

co

ntin

ued

to d

ate

as p

art

of

sta

keho

lders

’

eng

age

men

t activity.

2

1st –

5th S

ept

20

14

In

dira

Sim

bolo

n,

Jo

yce M

unsa

yac,

Iris

h A

guila

r

1.

SO

L t

o im

pro

ve s

takeh

old

er

en

gage

me

nt at

the

vill

age le

ve

l.

2.

Impro

vem

en

t of

grieva

nce

m

echan

ism

imp

lem

enta

tion

pa

rtic

ula

rly o

n t

he

im

pact

of

contr

acto

rs/s

ubcontr

acto

rs’ w

ork

.

3.

SO

L

to

incre

ase

its

sta

ff

capacity

for

impro

ve

d

sta

keh

old

er

en

ga

ge

me

nt

an

d

effective

IS

P

mo

nitori

ng

an

d

imp

lem

enta

tion

.

1.

Vill

age

Month

ly

me

etin

g

has

be

en

co

nducte

d

in

11

aff

ecte

d

vill

ages

an

d

ann

ounce

ment

boa

rds

we

re

insta

lled

in

th

e v

illage

s.

2.

SO

L h

ad t

ake

n the lea

d b

etw

een t

he m

ain

co

ntr

acto

r a

nd

sub-c

on

tracto

r to

sett

le t

he

outs

tan

din

g

gri

evan

ces.

Mon

itori

ng

was

don

e in

tensiv

ely

, a

nd im

ple

men

tatio

n of

grie

van

ce

mech

an

ism

wa

s im

pro

ve

d.

3.

CS

R an

d E

R te

am

w

ere

esta

blis

he

d to

im

ple

ment

an

d

monitor

the

im

ple

menta

tion

of

sta

keh

old

ers

’ eng

age

men

t an

d I

SP

activitie

s.

3

9th –

12

th M

arc

h 2

015

In

dira

Sim

bolo

n,

Jo

cely

n M

, M

ari

fe P

1.

Ide

ntification o

f vu

lnera

ble

land o

wn

ers

ha

d

not

ye

t b

een

fin

aliz

ed

b

y

SO

L

and

th

e

1. M

ost

vu

lnera

ble

la

nd

ow

ne

rs

iden

tifie

d

and

pre

para

tion

inclu

din

g a

sse

ssm

ent

for

the a

ssis

tance p

rog

ram

wa

s d

one.

71

live

lihood

re

sto

ration

pro

gra

m

to

be

imp

lem

ente

d.

2.

Work

ing e

mp

loym

en

t to

b

e pri

ori

tized

for

affecte

d lan

d o

wn

ers

.

3.

Som

e d

ela

ys i

n s

ettlin

g g

rie

van

ces r

ais

ed

by loca

l com

mun

itie

s.

2. E

mp

loym

en

t fo

r la

nd

ow

ne

rs

were

prio

ritized e

ith

er

in S

OL

, contr

acto

rs a

nd

su

b-c

ontr

acto

rs.

3. S

OL

had

im

pro

ve

d

the

m

on

itori

ng

w

ith

co

ntr

acto

rs &

subco

ntr

acto

rs t

o s

ett

le t

he

grie

van

ces

in

acco

rdan

ce

with

the

tim

elin

e.

4

2n

d -

7th A

ug

20

15

In

dira

Sim

bolo

n,

Jo

cely

n M

1.

Te

chn

ica

l so

lution

to

b

e

imp

lem

ente

d

in

respond

ing

to

som

e

of

co

mm

unitie

s’

grievances o

n P

roje

ct activitie

s im

pa

cts

.

2.

Grievance

s

on

d

ust,

tr

affic

, H

2S

odour/

sm

ell,

silt

ed w

ate

r, a

cce

ss t

o f

arm

ing

lan

d.

1.

Te

chn

ica

l so

lutio

n

has

be

en

imp

lem

ente

d

an

d

inclu

de

d

as

part

o

f

grievance

settle

me

nt.

2.

Grieva

nce

s h

ad bee

n fo

llow

ed u

p a

nd

settle

d.

Grieva

nce

ha

nd

ling s

yste

m h

ad

been

im

pro

ved.

5

29

th M

arc

h –

1st A

pri

l

2016

Indira

Sim

bolo

n,

Jo

cely

n M

1.

Occu

patio

nal h

ea

lth, sa

fety

and

issues to

be

addre

ssed a

nd

rectified

.

2.

2

majo

r grieva

nces;

da

mag

ed

fa

rmla

nds

belo

w N

IL P

ow

er

Pla

nt a

nd fa

rmla

nds a

t S

IL

are

a.

3.

Work

ers

an

d

lab

our

wo

rkin

g

co

nditio

n

issue

s

such

as

com

ple

tene

ss

of

basic

lab

our

docu

me

nts

, w

ork

ers

’

accom

mo

dation

whic

h

were

m

ain

ly

on

HD

EC

and

its

sub

-co

ntr

acto

rs.

1.Issues h

ad

bee

n a

ddre

ssed a

nd f

ollo

we

d

up w

ith

co

ntr

acto

rs &

su

bcontr

acto

rs.

2. G

rie

van

ces h

ad

be

en

sett

led

with

aff

ecte

d

lan

d

ow

ners

an

d

techn

ical

solu

tio

n

was

undert

aken a

s a

dvis

ed b

y A

DB

tea

m.

3.

Lab

our

issu

es

had

bee

n

rectifie

d

by

HD

EC

a

nd

inte

nsiv

e

mon

itori

ng

w

as

cond

ucte

d b

y S

OL

to e

nsure

th

e c

om

plia

nce

aga

inst

Indo

nesia

la

bour

law

an

d I

LO

core

Labo

ur

sta

ndard

.

Based o

n r

ecom

mend

atio

n fro

m the M

issio

n

lab

our

Au

dit w

as cond

ucte

d b

y G

old

er

in

Aug

ust 2

016 b

ased o

n t

he

72

6

5th –

8th D

ec 2

01

6

Indira

Sim

bolo

n,

Jo

cely

n M

1.

Concern

s

fro

m

the

fam

ily

of

arr

este

d

work

ers

wh

o w

ere

in

vo

lved in the

rio

t in

cid

ent

on 1

5th O

cto

ber

201

6 t

o b

e c

on

sid

ere

d a

nd

se

ttle

d b

y S

OL.

2.

Sta

tus

and

u

pd

ate

s

on

outs

tand

ing

grievance

s.

3.

ISP

im

ple

me

nta

tio

n u

pdate

1.

Issues w

ith the a

rreste

d w

ork

ers

had b

ee

n

well

acco

mm

oda

ted b

y S

OL i

n c

oopera

tio

n

with

th

e

polic

e,

com

mu

nity

eld

ers

an

d

work

ers

’ fa

mily

as

advis

ed

an

d

recom

me

nde

d b

y t

he

Mis

sio

n.

2.

Outs

tand

ing

gri

evances h

ad

be

en s

ett

led.

3.

ISP

activitie

s

in

20

16

had

be

en

imp

lem

ente

d a

s p

lan

ned a

nd targ

ete

d in

th

e

IPP

do

cu

men

t.

7

26

th M

arc

h –

1st A

pri

l

2017

LE

SC

(Ja

cob

s)

-

Ang

el M

an

em

bu

,

Do

rney B

urg

dorf

1.

To

ed

ucate

com

mun

ity

on

em

erg

ency

even

ts th

at m

ay im

pa

ct th

em

an

d to

co

nd

uct

more

fr

eq

ue

nt

socia

lizatio

ns

with

the

com

mu

nity

espe

cia

lly

duri

ng

th

e

constr

uction p

ha

se.

2.

Inte

nsiv

e m

on

ito

ring o

n t

he

im

ple

menta

tio

n

of

live

lihoo

d r

esto

ration p

rogra

m s

hou

ld b

e

done

reg

ula

rly.

3.

To

in

clu

de

cultura

l e

nh

an

cem

en

t an

d

gend

er

em

pow

erm

ent in

th

e IS

P a

ctivitie

s.

1.

Socia

lizatio

n

frequ

ency

ha

d

be

en

impro

ve

d

an

d

subje

ct

on

em

erg

ency

events

had

bee

n

dis

cu

ssed

with

lo

cal

co

mm

unitie

s

durin

g

vill

ag

e

mo

nth

ly

meeting

.

2.

Inte

nsiv

e

mon

itori

ng

has

be

en

do

ne

regula

rly.

3.

Pro

gra

m f

or

cultura

l e

nha

ncem

en

t in

th

e

mid

-term

ha

s

be

en

co

vere

d

in

the

co

nsu

lta

tio

n

an

d

part

icip

ation

activitie

s.

Fem

ale

pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n

ha

s

be

en

encoura

ged

in

th

e I

SP

activitie

s a

nd

it

is

part

of

gen

de

r e

mp

ow

erm

ent p

rogra

m.

8

26

th F

eb

– 1

st M

arc

h

2018

Indira

Sim

bolo

n,

Iris

h A

guila

r,

LE

SC

(Ja

cob

s)

-

Do

rney B

urg

dorf

1.

SO

L t

o d

evelo

p c

onsis

tent

messag

e f

or

the

local co

mm

unitie

s i

n r

egard

to e

mplo

ym

ent

opport

un

itie

s

duri

ng

o

pera

tio

n

an

d

main

ten

ance p

hase

.

2.

Successfu

l liv

elih

ood

resto

ratio

n

pro

gra

m

shou

ld b

e d

up

lica

ted

to

th

e e

xte

nt

feasib

le

in S

IL &

NIL

.

3.

Reco

rds

on

vita

l sta

tistics

of

an

d

part

icip

ation o

f w

om

en a

nd

rele

vant

gro

ups

1.

Info

rmation d

issem

inatio

n o

n e

mp

loym

ent

are

b

ein

g

do

ne

th

rou

gh

vill

ag

e

mon

thly

me

etin

g,

vill

ag

e a

nn

ounce

me

nt

bo

ard

an

d

com

mu

nic

atio

n thro

ugh

he

ad o

f vill

ag

es.

2.

Successfu

l pilo

t pro

gra

ms

ha

d

be

en

socia

lized

to lo

ca

l com

mun

itie

s in

SIL

& N

IL.

Th

ere

were

so

me

farm

ers

’ gro

ups tha

t w

ere

inte

reste

d t

o d

uplic

ate

the

pro

gra

m.

73

in v

ari

ous IS

P p

rogra

m inclu

din

g v

uln

era

ble

lan

d o

wn

ers

’ w

ho a

re b

en

efitt

ing f

rom

th

e

live

lihood

pro

gra

ms

to

be

upd

ate

d

an

d

mon

itore

d.

3.

Re

cord

s h

as b

een u

pdate

d a

nd r

eflecte

d

in t

he S

SM

R in 2

018

to d

ate

.

9

24

th F

eb -1

st

Marc

h

2019

Indira

Sim

bolo

n,

Marife

P,

LE

SC

(Ja

cob

s)

-

Ang

el M

an

em

bu

1.

Overa

ll pro

gre

ss

note

d in

th

e d

eliv

ery

of

CS

R

activitie

s,

but

there

is

ro

om

fo

r

impro

ve

me

nt.

2.

Tra

nsitio

n fr

om

constr

uctio

n to

o

pera

tio

ns

phase

pose

new

ch

alle

nges to

com

mun

itie

s:

job

s, d

imin

ishin

g e

cono

mic

activitie

s.

3.

SO

L

to

con

tin

ue

dia

log

ue

w

ith

the

local

gove

rnm

ent

to e

nsu

re th

at

port

ion of

the

pro

du

ction b

on

us w

ill be a

llocate

d to

th

e

deve

lopm

ent

of th

e S

OL a

ffe

cte

d a

reas.

4.

Ensure

th

at

co

mp

liance o

n la

bor

law

a

nd

Com

pany

Re

gu

latio

n

Polic

y

is

als

o

cascade

d to

contr

acto

rs a

nd s

ub

con

tracto

rs

in t

he o

pera

tio

n a

nd m

ain

tenance p

hase.

1.

Imp

rovem

ent

will

be

do

ne

based o

n th

e

recom

me

nd

atio

ns.

2.

This

find

ing

w

ill

be

consid

ere

d

in

the

live

liho

od r

esto

ration

pro

gra

m i

n t

he n

ext

pha

se.

3.

Co

ntin

uous c

oord

inatio

n w

ill b

e c

arr

ied o

ut

with

loca

l govern

me

nt

and

rela

ted

sta

kehold

ers

.

4.

Socia

lizatio

n

to

con

tracto

rs

and

sub

-

co

ntr

acto

rs

in

the

o

pera

tion

a

nd

main

ten

an

ce

ph

ase

is

con

tinu

ously

und

ert

aken.

74

SOL understands that a Resettlement Completion Audit is expected following the receipt

of this RCR. SOL considers that the RCR review result can be treated as an independent

external evaluation whether SOL complies with the international standard requirements,

particularly ADB SPS related to resettlement plan. Corrective actions will refer to the

Resettlement Completion Audit evaluation results.

6. ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION

Based on the implementation of RP/LRP, the commitments agreed by SOL were assessed

and evaluated with the details as follows:

1. Compensation and benefits a. Replacement cost paid

Replacement cost for land and plants/crops has been paid to all land owners as

agreed. The replacement cost was above the market price (ref. section 3.4) and

some land owners were using the replacement cost to purchase new land.

b. Assets replaced

During the land acquisition, there was no permanent structure/building affected.

c. Payment to be done prior to manifestation of impact

Payment for the required land was completed before the construction work. For the

WJP and road 5 the payment was undertaken in early 2015, while for the T/L

facilities it started after February 2014 (Ref. section 3.5).

d. Shifting allowance / other benefits paid

Payment for shifting allowance is required when there is permanent structure /

building acquired by the Project. However, as stated in point b above, there was

no permanent structure / building affected, thus no shifting allowance was paid.

2. Livelihood / income restoration a. Income restored to 100% of immediate pre-Project level

Based on the survey conducted by USU in 2017 and ERM in 2014, data shows

that some of the land owners were better off after their land was acquired by the

Project, while most of the affected land owners have more or less the same level

of income before and after the Project. Thus, it is concluded that income of the land

owners is restored to 100% of immediate pre-project level.

b. Secure employment for impacted persons

Employment were prioritised and provided to the affected land owners particularly

for the most vulnerable group. As explained in section 4.2, out of 12 most

vulnerable land owners who did not manage the assistance program for livelihood

restoration sustainably, there were seven (7) land owners who already worked for

the Project. Out of 41 poor land owners as identified by USU in the social survey,

75

there were 16 that were working in the Project either with SOL or Contractors &

sub-contractors, five (5) are currently still working in the Project. During the

construction phase, the affected land owners were given priorities for employment

based on their skill and capability.

c. Training / Skill Building

Agricultural and skill training were part of the ISP program being implemented since

2015 – to date. Agricultural training activities consisted of making of organic

fertilizer and animal feed, livestock breeding/growing, crop diversification, fish

farming, etc. Skill training sessions implemented were driving training for youth

group, bakery for female youth group, sewing for women’s group (ref. Appendix C).

The outcomes resulted from the trainings programs are:

1. Participants are able to apply new knowledge and techniques in their farming

activities.

2. Farmers’ group members who were serious and committed in the program

have improved income and continue the activity as they deem it is potential to

be developed.

3. Youth group and women group members are having new skills to be used as

source of income. They have gained additional income by doing this group

activity.

d. Loans / Micro Credits

Micro credit program has been implemented through a revolving fund mechanism

since 2018 to date. There were two groups of women involved in this program

namely women’s group in Janji Natogu village and in Lumban Jaean village with

30 & 13 members respectively. Total number of women participated in this program

is 43, of whom 13 are affected land owners. Aside from the assistance provided,

the micro-credit program also included the book keeping and household financial

management training to the two groups.

e. Help with small enterprise development

In the assistance program for most vulnerable land owners, there were 4 land

owners provided with assistance to develop small household business, to start a

coffee shop (warung) individually. For farmers’ group assisted by SOL through ISP,

the farmers developed their agriculture & production through market facilitation and

analysis for fish breeds, duck’ egg, vegetables and piglets. This activity was

expected to be expanded in the long run to become small enterprises, which will

help the economy of each member.

3. Assets

There was no physical displacement or house relocation taken place, and thus, no

legal title issued for relocated houses. Compensation cost for temporary structure was

paid. No outstanding issues.

4. Resettlement Site and Social Infrastructure a. Improved Housing

76

b. All common Infrastructure & amenities in place

c. Reasonable integration with host community

There was no physical displacement or house relocation taken place during the

Project; there was no new resettlement site needing newly built common

infrastructures ISP is well implemented in close consultation with local communities.

5. Grievance Mechanism

a. Functional Grievance Mechanism implemented

Grievance mechanism was implemented and managed well by the Project. The

mechanism was well functioning and maintained to address the grievances related

with project activities.

b. Online tracking system for grievances available

Grievance log was created during the construction phase in 2015 to date to record

all grievances received from local communities and updates were regularly

distributed to related department internally.

6. Monitoring & Documentation a. Established monitoring mechanism in place and duly implemented

During land acquisition activity, internally SOL established a land acquisition team

and ER team who conducted weekly and monthly monitoring on the activity

progress. External monitoring was conducted by ADB and LESC from 2015 to date,

ERM in 2014-205, USU for social aspect of AMDAL in 2016 -2018 and social

survey in 2017.

b. Results on internal as well as external monitoring disclosed

Findings and results from the internal and monitoring result were submitted to the

management and related department in the Project to be used as references for

evaluation and improvement.

Improvement and actions taken based on the monitoring were reported & disclosed

in the SSMR submitted to ADB per semester.

c. Documentation unit established

SOL established a documentation unit known as documentation center in Jakarta

and at the site. The documentation unit for land acquisition was handled by the

land acquisition team. The procedure for documentation for land acquisition was

established and implemented by the responsible unit throughout land acquisition

process.

7. Institutional Support

a. Resettlement Implementation Unit was established by SOL, consisting of:

- LA team

- Legal Team

77

- Notary

- ER team.

This resettlement implementation unit was explained in the SSCAR document and

applied in the land acquisition process for the RP as well. Implementation of

RP/LRP was also supported by the following institutions:

- Local government Offices of North Tapanuli such as agricultural office,

education office, health office and Regency office;

- National Land Agency (BPN);

- Sub district office and village administration.

b. Adequate infrastructure and resources provided to the unit

Required infrastructure and resources such as office, electronics and

communication equipment, vehicles and resources were made available and

adequate to support the resettlement implementation unit.

8. RP/LRP Budget a. Adequate budget as estimated in the RP/LRP set aside.

The budget estimated for RP/LRP was IDR 200,000,000. While LRP budget for

NIL E-1 as explained in the Supplementary Land acquisition Plan, the budget is

included in the ISP annual budget since the affected villages are already included

in the implementation of ISP since 2015 to date.

As shown in appendix B, ISP budget spending for 2015 - 2019:

2015 – 2017 : ± IDR 800,000,000 per annum 2018 : ± IDR 2 Milliard 2019 : ±IDR 2,5 Milliard (ongoing)

The first phase of ISP (2015-2017) was already delivered and completed. The ISP

is still being implemented (second phase) and will be continued throughout the

project as committed in the IPP document.

b. There are no pending actions related with RP/LRP activities that would require

provisions for additional budget.

Referring to the elaborated discussion as presented in above sections, SOL confirmed

that:

Land acquisition process for power plant facilities and transmission lines were

complete.

Payment of compensation for lost assets (crops, loss of land, loss of structures,

moving allowance and other benefits) were properly settled and completely paid

(ref. Appendix B regarding total spending on RP/LRP).

Completion of resettlement entitlements and livelihood restoration are adequately

described in Section 3 and Section 4, together with related Appendices as the

evidence of the program implementation.

78

No outstanding claims, disputes or grievances related to RP/LRP implementation

being left unattended and unresolved (ref. Section 4.7).

No physical displacement was undertaken. Instead, SOL developed an LRP

following the economic displacement and carefully identified the most vulnerable

group (ref. Section 4). Restoration of social networks and evidence of integration

with the host communities were adequately presented in the IPP/ISP.

Land acquisition process was conducted through Location permit mechanism via

direct negotiation and an agreed price with land owners. The entire process of land

acquisition was conducted by SOL while the local government’s role was to

facilitate and to monitor the process. With regards to disclosure of information, SOL

followed the requirements as defined in the IPP (ref. Section 4.6).

The internal monitoring was conducted intensively by SOL through multiple

monitoring systems and intrinsically linked to the progress of ISP. SOL ER Team

collected information through regular visits (monthly and quarterly basis), village

meeting (monthly basis) and grievance monitoring (daily basis). The monitoring

results were also reported to concerned parties on regular basis (ref. Section 5.1).

The external monitoring was conducted by USU in 2017 resulting in Social Survey

report. The socio-economic survey results are taken into account and further

verified and strengthened during the preparation and establishment of this RCR.

SOL expects that RCA to be conducted following the receipt of this RCR.

SOL also observed some opportunities for improvement to ensure continuation and

sustainable RP/LRP implementation related to:

Most vulnerable group

13 out of 17 people categorized as most vulnerable have not managed to continue

the assistance program provided by SOL.

5 out of these 13 people are currently not employed by or do not work for SOL or

its contractors. SOL is to further evaluate these people to be included in the

ongoing and future ISP and LRP program.

Poor land owners (based on USU social survey)

Based merely on income analysis, USU indicated that 41 out of 163 land owners

(25.77%) lived below the poverty line. This conclusion was found to be made

without taking into account the standards of living indicators. The Indonesia

standard categorizes people living below poverty line if they embrace at least 9 of

14 indicators defined by BPS.

SOL further verification of the 41 affected households against the BPS standard of

living indicators shows that not a single household embraces nine BPS indicators

at once. This supports the conclusion that no household can be categorized as

living below the poverty line:

- Five (5) households embraces 1 BPS indicator

- 18 households embrace 2 BPS indicators

79

- 14 households embrace 3 BPS indicators

- Two (2) households embrace 4 BPS indicators

- Two (2) households embrace 5 BPS indicators

Further verification and analysis were also made to measure poverty of the affected land

owners based on both income and expenses. The result indicates that, based on income

and expenses, there are only 11 land owners who are considered poor or living below

poverty line. However, based on the said BPS standard of living indicators, the 11 land

owners are not considered poor.

Similar to the approach proposed for the most vulnerable group, SOL is to consider to

further evaluate these 11 people to be included in the ongoing ISP and future ISP.

80

7. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION

a. Conclusion

Table 19 presents SOL commitments and conclusion of the RP/LRP evaluation status.

The Table is developed based on the ADB’s suggested format for evaluating the RP/LRP

commitments.

Table 19 SOL RP/LRP Commitments Evaluation Status



1 Compensation &

Benefits

o Replacement cost paid;

o Lost assets replaced;

o Payment to be done prior to

manifestation of impact;

o Shifting allowance/other benefits

paid.

√ Fully Met

Compensation amount

adequate and at

replacement value and paid

out prior to the manifestation

of impact. All payment


issues

2 Livelihood/Income

Restoration

o Income restored to 100% of

immediate pre-Project level;

o Secure employment for impacted

persons;

o Training/Skill Building;

o Loans/Micro-credits;

o Help with small enterprise

development;

√ Fully Met

Income restored. LRP

program implemented. To

sustain the program

particularly the income

restoration, SOL is to

consider including the

remaining most vulnerable

group and poor land owners

(based on USU SS). No

outstanding issues.

3 Assets

o Legal titles issued for houses;

o Other assets like cowsheds,

house furniture, farm equipment’s

(as relevant) given to eligible

families;

√ Fully Met

No physical relocation taken

place, no need for issuance

of legal title for houses.

Compensation payment with

total amount of IDR

400,020,300 for temporary

structures were completed.


3

Resettlement Site

and Social

Infrastructure

o Improved Housing;

o All common Infrastructure &

amenities in place;

o Reasonable integration with host

community.

√ Fully Met

No physical displacement

taken place; no new

resettlement site created.

ISP well implemented in

close consultation with host

communities. No outstanding

issues

4 Grievance

Mechanism

o Functional GM system

implemented; √ Fully Met

Grievance Redress

Mechanism established and

well functioned. No

outstanding grievances

81



o Online tracking system for

grievances available.

related to RP/LRP. No

outstanding issues

5 Monitoring &

Documentation

o Established monitoring

mechanism in place and duly

implemented;

o Results on internal as well as

external monitoring disclosed

o Documentation unit established.

√ Fully Met

Internal monitoring

conducted intensively (ref.

Section 5.1). As part of

regular monitoring, the

implementation of the

RP/LRP was reported in the

SSMR 2015-2018 and was

disclosed on the web.

External monitoring was

conducted by USU. The

RCR will be disclosed on the

web. An RCA is expected

following the receipt of the

RCR. No outstanding issues

6 Institutional

Support

o Establish Resettlement

Implementation Unit to

support/facilitate R&R;

o Provide adequate infrastructure

and resources to the unit;

√ Fully Met

A Resettlement Unit was

established, supported by

the ER Team and CSR

Team. Budget for

institutional support was

provided adequately.

IPP/ISP program well

implemented and monitored.


7 RP/LRP Budget

o Set aside the budget as

estimated in the RP/LRP;

o Provision for additional budget to

complete any pending actions

√ Fully Met

RP/LRP budget allocated as

part of ISP in 2015-2019 with

total amount of ± IDR

6,900,000,000. Total

spending was well

monitored, evaluated and

reported (ref. Appendix B),


b. Recommendations Based on the review and evaluation result, below are the recommendations that need

to be considered and assessed:

1. Livelihood restoration & ISP

a. SOL to conduct further assessment on 5 of most vulnerable land owners which

were based on ERM social survey and 11 land owners based on social survey

conducted by USU to be included in the LRP program as part of the ISP.

82

b. Conduct an evaluation of assistance program that has been implemented for

the 17 most vulnerable land owners. Evaluation results to be used as

references and lesson learnt prior to the implementation of the next LRP activity

to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency so that benefits from the program

could be maximised for the targeted land owners and sustainable.

2. Grievance mechanism

a. Improving the timeline for grievances settlement to avoid delays.

b. Provide training for ER team to improve their skill and knowledge in grievance

handling and communication system.

c. Assess the improvement required for the establishment of online tracking

grievance system internally.

3. Documentation

Review of all monitoring results and ensure good filing system of all

documentations related with land acquisitions, stakeholder’s engagement and

ISP/LRP activities reports.

4. External monitoring

Evaluate the performance of external consultants that will be required for the next

ISP implementation monitoring such as USU and other related consultants.

External consultant’s role is important to obtain objective feedback and inputs on

ISP/LRP implementation process.

c. Corrective Action Plan and/or Recommended Actions for Improvement

There are no outstanding issues related to land acquisition and livelihood restoration.

As such, no corrective actions required. However, in terms of livelihood improvement,

there are some recommendations for strengthening the implementation of the ongoing

ISP and preparation of the future ISP. Table 20 provides Recommended Actions for

Improvement to assist SOL in strengthening the implementation of the ongoing ISP

and the preparation of the future ISP, the continuation of the GRM and monitoring

activities.

83

Tab

le 2

0 R

eco

mm

end

ed A

ctio

ns

for

Imp

rove

men

t

No

Issu

es/T

op

ics

Rec

om

men

ded

Act

ion

s T

imel

ines

E

stim

ated

Bu

dg

et

(US

D)

Res

po

nsi

ble

Dep

t (P

IC)

Rem

arks

1

Liv

elih

oo

d

resto

ration &

IS

P

1.

Co

nd

uct

assessm

en

t on 5

of

most

vuln

era

ble

la

nd

ow

ne

rs w

hic

h w

ere

based

on

ER

M s

ocia

l su

rvey a

nd

11 la

nd

ow

ners

ba

sed

on

socia

l su

rvey c

ond

ucte

d b

y

US

U t

o d

ete

rmin

e w

he

ther

the

gro

up

s n

eed

to

be

inclu

ded

in th

e L

RP

or

no

t.

De

c 2

01

9/J

an

ua

ry

202

0

30

0

CS

R

2.

Eva

lua

te th

e a

ssis

tance

pro

gra

ms th

at

ha

ve

be

en

imple

men

ted

fo

r th

e 1

7 m

ost vuln

era

ble

land o

wne

rs.

De

c 2

01

9/J

an

ua

ry

202

0

200

CS

R

3.

Im

ple

me

nt

LR

P fo

r th

e m

ost

vuln

era

ble

g

roup in

poin

t #

1

base

d

on

the

asse

ssm

ent

result

and

evalu

ation

re

sult in

poin

t # 2

.

Q1

202

0

650

0

CS

R

Will

be

part

of IS

P

bud

get in

2020

2

Grie

vance

mecha

nis

m

1.

Re

gu

lar

mon

ito

r o

f th

e g

rievance’s

reso

lution s

tatu

s

We

ekly

N

/A

ER

2.

Pro

vid

e

train

ing

on

grievan

ce

mecha

nis

m

for

ER

team

mem

bers

(in

house tra

inin

g a

nd

/or

exte

rnal)

1st S

em

este

r 2020

550

HR

W

ill b

e p

art

of H

R

tra

inin

g b

ud

ge

t

3.

Co

nd

uct

refr

eshm

en

t tr

ain

ing

on

grievance

mecha

nis

m fo

r all

ER

te

am

m

em

bers

and

re

late

d

dep

art

ments

1st S

em

este

r 2020

300

ER

3

Do

cu

me

nta

tion

1.

Pro

vid

e

tra

inin

g

on

g

ood

pra

ctice

rela

ted

to

adm

inis

tra

tive

fili

ng/d

ocum

enta

tio

n s

yste

m

1st a

nd 2

nd s

em

este

r 2

02

0

120

0

HR

W

ill b

e p

art

of H

R

tra

inin

g b

ud

ge

t

2.

Esta

blis

h t

he

mecha

nis

m f

or

docum

en

tation

pra

ctice

rela

ted

to

socia

l pro

gra

m a

ctivitie

s

De

c 2

019

/Ja

nuary

2020

N/A

E

R

3.

Re

gu

larly m

on

itor

the c

om

ple

tion

of

docum

enta

tion

of

activitie

s

rela

ted

to

land

a

cq

uis

itio

n,

sta

keh

old

er

enga

ge

me

nt

an

d I

SP

im

ple

men

tation

Mo

nth

ly

N/A

E

R

84

4

Exte

rna

l

mon

ito

rin

g

Eva

lua

te t

he

perf

orm

an

ce o

f e

xte

rnal

consultan

ts t

ha

t

will

be

requ

ired

for

the

next

ISP

im

ple

menta

tion

mon

ito

rin

g s

uch

as U

SU

an

d o

ther

rela

ted

co

nsultants

.

De

c 2

01

9/J

an

ua

ry

202

0

N/A

C

SR

85

APPENDICES

86

Appendix A. Land acquisition process in photographs

No Documentation

Activity

1

Survey and identification of land owners for SIL 1 – SIL 3 location, 15 September 2015

2

Socialization and negotiation with some land owners for T-Line ROW, 25 September 2014

3

Confirmation on width and number of plants for NIL E -1, 12 July 2016

87

No Documentation

Activity

4

Checking of documentation and legal letter of land ownership for T-Line ROW, 26 September 2014

5

Meeting preparation for compensation payment for T-Line ROW, 29 September 2014

6

Compensation payment for land and plants for SIL 1-SIL 3, 19 November 2015

88

Appendix B. Budget and Total spending for T-line, WJP 1, Road 5 & NIL E-1

Payment (IDR) ±

No Location

Plants Land Structure/Building

1 RoW 8,546,519,000

2,030,966,250

400,020,300

2 Tower Foundation 2,286,008,300

2,678,840,000

-

3 Access Road 5 & WJP 1N 6,170,060,500

12,101,830,000

-

4 NIL E-1 2,673,183,900

3,545,290,000

-

Sub total 19,675,771,700

20,356,926,250 400,020,300

Total LA (1+2+3)

40,432,718,250

4 ISP annual budget (incl. LRP 2015-2017)

2,400,000,000 (2015-2017: 800,000,000/Annum)

5 ISP budget 2018 (incl. LRP)

± 2,000,000,000

6 ISP budget 2019 (incl. LRP) - ongoing

± 2,500,000,000

89

Appendix C. ISP implementation 2015-2016

90

Appendix D. ISP implementation 2016-2018

95

Appendix E. Summary of consultation/socialization on land acquisition (2015 – 2018)

No. Date Activities # of Participants

Attendees Male Female

1 20-Feb-14 Land and plants compensation for Tower Footprint in SIL and NIL Area

61 23 SOL staff, Notary, Head of Village Sibaganding, Lumban Jaean, Simataniari, Hutabarat, Simanampang, Lontung Dolok, Elders, Kapolsek, Danramil, Camat Pahae

Julu & Land Owners

2 21-Feb-14 Land and plants compensation for Tower Footprint in NIL Area

64 18 SOL staff, Notary, Head of Village Simanampang, Sitolu Ama, Silangkitang,

Sigurung-gurung, Elders, Kapolsek, Danramil, Camat Pahae Julu/Pahae Jae &

Land Owners

3 25-Sep-14 Socialization ROW in Sitolu Ama 19 6 SOL Staff, Head Village Sitolu Ama, Elders & Land Owners

4 26-Sep-14 Socialization ROW in Simanampang & Hutabarat

51 13 SOL Staff, Head of Village Hutabarat, Simanampang, Elders & Land Owners

5 29-Sep-14 Socialization ROW in Onan Hasang & Lontung Dolok

30 - SOL Staff, Head of Village Onan Hasang, Lontung Dolok, Camat Pahae Julu, Elders &

Land Owners

6 30-Sep-14 Socialization ROW in Sibaganding, Lumban Jaean & Simataniari

40 5 SOL Staff, Head of Village Sibaganding, Lumban Jaean, Simataniari, Camat Pahae

Julu, Elders & Land Owners

7 1-Oct-14 Socialization ROW in Silangkitang & Sigurung-gurung

76 6 SOL Staff, Head of Village Silangkitang, Sigurung-gurung, Camat Pahae Jae, Elders

& Land Owners

8 22-Oct-14 Payment Compensation ROW in Silangkitang, Sigurung-gurung & Sitolu Ama

98 31 SOL Staff, Head of Village Sigurung-gurung, Sitolu Ama, Camat Pahae Jae, Notary,

Elders & Land Owners

9 23-Oct-14 Payment Compensation ROW in Hutabarat & Simanampang

49 74 SOL Staff, Head of Village Hutabarat, Simanampang, Camat, Kapolsek Pahae

Julu, Notary, Elders & Land Owners

10 9-Dec-14 Payment additional land Access Road-5 31 4 SOL Staff, Notary, Head Village Lumban Jaean, Sibaganding, Elders, Camat Pahae

Julu/Staff and Land Owners

11 15-Jun-15 Socializations for LA to widen the drainage for rrainage expansion in Aek Accimun & Siangir located under NIL Powerplant

12 3 SOL Staff, Head of Village Simataniari, Elders & Land Owners

12 5-Oct-15 Socialization for Land Acquiring Brine Injection Line SIL-1 to SIL-3

40 10 SOL Staff, Head of Village Silangkitang, Pardamean, Pardomuan, elders & Land

Owners

13 21-Oct-15 Negotiated socializations the price of the land Brine Injections Line SIL 1 – SIL 3

40 16 SOL Staff, Head of Village Silangkitang, Pardamean, Pardomuan, Camat Pahae Jae, Elders & Land Owners

14 19-Nov-15 Land acquisition payment for brine injection line SIL-1 to SIL-3

64 21 SOL Staff, Finance, BNI, Notary, Security, Police, Head of Village Pardamean, Pardomuan, Camat, Danramil & Kapolsek Pahae Jae, elders & Land Owners

15 22-Dec-15 Payment T-Line ROW Sigurung-gurung 21 15 SOL Staff, Head Village Sigurung-gurung, Silangkitang, Sitolu Ama, Legal SOL,Sekcam & Kapolsek Pahae Jae

16 29-Dec-15 LA payment for drainage expansion in Aek Accimun & Siangir located under NIL Powerplant

20 13 SOL Staff, Notary, Head Village Simataniari, Elders & Land Owners

96



17 5-Feb-16 Socialization negociated additional ROW at Sigurung-gurng

7 3 SOL Staff, Head Village Sigurung-gurung, Camat Pahae Jae/Staff, elders & Land Owners

18 23-Feb-16 Payment Additional brine injection SIL-1 to SIL-2 and ROW Compensation

19 4 SOL Staff, Notary, Head of Village Silangkitang, Sigurung-gurung, Camat Pahae Jae, Security, Police, team BNI, elders & Land Owners

19 17-Jun-16 Socialization on land acquisition drainage OHC at Partali Julu Tarutung

- 11 SOL Staff, Head of Village & Land Owners

20 19-Jul-16 LA payment for grievance technical solution in Pancur Tombak under NIL powerplant

16 3 SOL Staff, Head Village Simataniari, Camat, Notary, Security, Police & Land Owners

21 2-Aug-16 Socialization on land acquisition for NIL E-1 Location

57 13 SOL Staff, Head Village Onan Hasang , Janji Natogu, Camat/Staff, Satpol PP, Sekdes, Elders & Land Owners

22 6-Sep-16 Socialization and signing of nominative list for land and crops (NIL E-1 LA)

44 10 SOL Staff, Head Village Onan Hasang , Janji Natogu, Camat/Staff, Satpol PP, Sekdes, Elders & Land Owners

23 12&13 Dec-2017

LA payment for the construction of drainage in Nahumarpe located under WJR-2 - technical solution for grievance

32 3 SOL Staff, Notary, Police, Security, Elders & Land Owners

24 5-Feb-18 Socialization to land owners in Nahumarpe area affected by Fumarole manifestation- located under WJR-2, technical solution for grievance

8 1 SOL Staff & Land Owners

25 22-Feb-18 Signing of land nominative list - Nahumarpe area affected by Fumarole manifestation- located under WJR-2LA fumarole WJR-2, technical solution for grievance

14 3 SOL Staff, Head Village Lumban Jaean, Sibaganding, Elders & Land Owners

26 1-Mar-18 LA payment for land owners in Nahumarpe area affected by Fumarole manifestation- located under WJR-2

16 3 SOL Staff, Notary, Head Village Lumban Jaean, Security, Police, Elders & Land Owners

Total 859 302

97

Appendix F. Communication Media used by SOL

Announcement board in Simataniari village (NIL)

Leaflet – Sarulla Project

99

Video presentation – Introduction to Geothermal Power for children

100

Appendix G. Consultation and participation meeting on RP and LRP

The list is taken from SSMR 2015 -2018, section K.

No Activities Date /Time

Venue Attendees Description Documentations

1. Socialization on steam

blow test at NIL-1 &

danger of high voltage

electricity to small

warung owners &

Farmers around NIL-1

area

January

12,

2 pm

HDEC

Office Warung owners,

Farmers around

NIL-1 area,

(± 13,

Male:10, Female:3)

-Explanation on:

a. steam blow test blow test

activities which will conducted by

HDEC on January 13, 2018 and

some noise as well as steam that

will appear because of this activity

b. The danger of high voltage

electricity during this activity.

c. The local communities not to be

near or doing activities close to

the venting pipes.

2.

Socialization on the construction work at NIL E-1 well pad

January 26,

10 am

Janji Natogu Village

SOL’s team ( ER, HSE, Construction), PT Dyfco Energy and Baktya Utama, Janji Natogu Local communities USPIKA (Sub District Head of Offices), Head Villages (Jnaji Natogu & Onan Hasang) (±250,

Male: 145, Female:105).

Explanation on:

a. Plan for the commencement

of construction work activity

at NIL E-1 location which

included access road,

installation of pipe line from

Hamilton bridge to Batang

Toru river

b. Priorities for local workers’

recruitment and engaging

local vendors based on their

skill & capabilities

c. Potential impacts

3. Village Monthly Meeting at Sigurung-gurung

January 22, 04 pm

Head of Village House

SOL ER & HSE,

CSR team, Local

Communities,

USPIKA (Sub

District Head of

Offices) & Head

Village

(±18

Male: 9

Female:9)

-Explanation on current Project activities update

-Discussion on employment

issues including reduction of

workers

-Discussion on CSR program to

be implemented in 2018

101



4.

Village Monthly Meeting at Janji Natogu

January 23,

4 pm

Head of

Village

House

SOL ER & CSR,

Local Communities

& Head Village

(± 49

Male:30

Female:19)

-Explanation on current Project activities update in NIL E-1 location



workers



5.

Village Monthly Meeting at Pardomuan Nainggolan

January 24,

4 pm

Head of

Village

House

SOL ER & CSR,

Local Communities,

USPIKA (Sub

District Head of

Offices) & Head

Village

(±33

Male:14

Female:19)

-Explanation on current Project activities update



workers



6. Meeting & discussion on fumarole manifestation at Nahumarpe, under WJR-2 location

Feb 5,

4 pm

NIL

Office

SOL

SOL’ s ER &

Construction team,

land owners

(±10

Male:9,

Female:1).

-Explanation on fumarole

manifestation at Nahumarpe as

normal occurrence in geothermal

location.

-Discussion on grievance raised

by affected land owners due to

this occurrence. Technical

solutions are being discussed by

SOL and some of the alternatives

considered are to acquire the

affected land since they are no

longer could be cultivated and

installation of sediment pond in

the land.

7. Socialization & negotiation on land acquisition at Nahumarpe location

Feb 22, SOL

Office

NIL

SOL ER & LA

team, affected land

owners, Head of

village

(± 33

Male: 27

Female; 6)

-Explanation on land acquisition

process and schedule

-Negotiation on land price and

crops

8. Village Monthly Meeting at Simanampang

April 23,

4 pm

Head of

Village

House

SOL ER & CSR,

Local Communities,

USPIKA (Sub

District Head of

Offices) & Head

Village

(± 30

Male:10

Female:20)

- Explanation on current Project activities updates

-Discussion on CSR program

102



9. Socialization on steam blow test at NIL-3

April 30,

9 am

NIL-3 SOL ER & HSE

team, Warung

owners and farmers

who cultivate land

surrounding NIL-3

location, & workers

Explanation on steam blow test

blow test activities and some

noise as well as steam that will

appear because of this activity at

NIL-3.

103

Appendix H. Sample Report to External Parties

Quarterly report to Pertamina Geothermal Energy (PGE) – Cover

Semi-annual report to Local Government (Cover)

104

Appendix I. Spot checks in 2015-2018



1 13-May-17 DPR meeting with Bupati Taput & SOL and then visit to Powerplant (Parlindungan Purba)

20 - SOL's staff, DPR Pusat (Parlindungan Purba), Bupati & Staff, Security, Police & Journalist.

2 24-Jul-17 SOL's meeting with commission-D DPRD (Parliament) Sumut

43 4

SOL's staff, Staff Komisi D DPRD Provsu, Bupati Taput/Staff, Dinas Energi dan sumber daya mineral provsu,Lindup Sumut, PMPHI-SU

3 18-May-18 Meeting with MEMR (Ministry of Mineral Resources) team regarding National vital object (Obvitnas)

10 - SOL Staff & and Obvitnas team

4 30-Jan-19 Commission-B DPRD visit to Project 17 2 SOL's staff, Kehutanan & Commission-B DPRD ProvSu.

5 13-May-17 Meeting with DPRD of North Tapanuli No

Information No

information

Poltak Pakpahan (Chairman), and Parliament Members, Local Governments (Finance Dept, Education Dept, Environment Dept,etc), SOL (Donny T, Industan Sitompul, and Rangga Ahmad)

Total 90 6

Social Monitoring Report...DPRD : Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah – Local Legislative EBTKE :...

Documents

Transcript of Social Monitoring Report...DPRD : Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah – Local Legislative EBTKE :...