Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations
description
Transcript of Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations
![Page 1: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Paul WhiteProfessor of European Urban Geography
University of Sheffield, UK
Plenary address to the IMISCOE cross-cluster theory conference, Lisbon, 13 – 15
May 2009
![Page 2: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Policy should follow from research. But arguably the ideologies behind policy
have led research Policy goals throughout Europe:
• Reduce the significance of the ethnic dimension in the public and policy sphere
• Encourage ‘them’ to be and behave more like ‘us’ Strong elements of the elevation of the
ethnic dimension as the explanation of everything
But is the policy discourse shared by all?
![Page 3: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
“Differential take-up” – Google search results in the native language:
United KingdomThe Netherlands c 3000 mentionsGermanyItalySpainFrance c 500 mentionsGreeceAustriaPortugal c 100 mentions
![Page 4: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1. Some thoughts on Putnam on the ethnic dimension of social relations
2. Some thoughts on longitudinal issues in research
3. Observations on assumptions underlying policy positions
4. Some thoughts on methods and research approaches
![Page 5: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Putnam’s definition of social capital: “social networks and the associated norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness” (2007, p. 137)
Social capital is an interdisciplinary term, drawing from sociology and economics
Paralleled by economic capitalhuman capitalcultural capital (Bourdieu)
possibly symbolic capital
![Page 6: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Distinction between ‘bonding ’and ‘bridging’ capital
‘Bonding’ capital links like people together‘Bridging’ capital links people who are unlikeBonding works within groups: bridging works
between groups
2007 paper (E pluribus unum) comes to the conclusion that where ethnic diversity is high, levels of both bonding and bridging capital are reeduced
![Page 7: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Observations on Putnam:1. Individuals or groups?2. What constitutes a group? Who decides?3. The fluidity of identities. And “The linkage
between identity and social capital is only beginning to be explored” (Putnam, 2007, p. 159)
4. Distinctions between bonding and bridging capital.
5. The emphasis on trust rather than interactions
6. Difficulties over the longitudinal
![Page 8: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Age
Year
Events e.g. 9/11
Life histories by cohort
Advantages and disadvantages?
Major migration events
![Page 9: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Age
Year
Events e.g. 9/11
Advantages and disadvantages?
Period analyses
![Page 10: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Age
Year
Events e.g. 9/11
The difficult to fulfil elements
Limited possibilities from surveys, but …
![Page 11: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
For neighbourhoods, longitudinal studies are likely to require multiple data sources.
But long-term longitudinal evidence is important for Putnam’s theories of social capital, because of his expectation of ‘short-term pain’ for ‘long-term gain’.
![Page 12: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Putnam’s own evidence on longitudinal change is weak.
2007 study produced no evidence of inter-generational change (although only from period data). Anecdotes were more supportive.
But he claims that survey data (e.g. in the UK) shows an increase in tolerance.
![Page 13: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Putnam: “The central challenge for modern, diversifying societies is to create a new, broader sense of ‘we’.” (2007, p. 139)
![Page 14: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Scholten and Holzacker (2009) and the re-examination of Dutch policy discourses in the light of bonding and bridging capital
But what about the fundamental bases of policy – to reduce the significance of ethnic dimensions, and to encourage ‘them’ to be like ‘us’?
Would these bases be agreed to by all parties?
![Page 15: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
1. Tamil refugees in London (Healey, 2009) –‘Success’ defined solely within the group. Very little bridging capital: almost all is bonding capital. No desire to bridge.
2. Pakistanis in Britain -- the rhetoric of elderly women (Khan 2003)- studies of younger men (Rowntree Foundation 2008)
![Page 16: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
And if the policy desire is to create bridging capital, does this apply at group or at individual level?
Is increasing social mixing really ‘a good thing’?
And for whom?
What about policies aimed at enabling more hyphenated identities?
![Page 17: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Should policy have increasing bridging ties as a primary goal, or as a recognised secondary outcome (e,g, of education, employment, housing etc policies operating for the individual)?
Better to bond first, then to bridge? (Barack Obama in Chicago)
Can change be speeded up? What about the expressed wishes of some parties?
Might mixing reduce social capital? (Putnam)
![Page 18: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1. Need to re-examine assumptions about what the ethnic dimension of social relations should be like
2. Clarity over individuals or groups3. If individuals, allow fluidity – don’t
categorise externally4. If groups, allow internal definitions and
mobility
![Page 19: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
5. Consider behaviour as well as attitudes. ‘Relations’ are about transactions.
6. Focus on the neighbourhood, but also allow for other interactions in other spaces – workplaces, leisure, the internet. Transnational space may be important.
7. Recognise the value of qualitative and in depth methods. Issues are complex and subtle.
![Page 20: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The wider our range of ‘interesting observations’ the better our knowledge should be.
Putnam: “Exploring the dynamics, as opposed to the comparative statics, of diversity and social capital requires entirely different methods” (2007, p. 159).
![Page 21: Social capital, longitudinal research and ethnicity in social relations](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062723/56813e4b550346895da8370b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)