So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

16
So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University

Transcript of So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

Page 1: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

So what happened to the electoral system in 2010?

John CurticeStrathclyde University

Page 2: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

The (principal) case for FPP

• Provides for a system of alternating single party majority government

• That means that governments are clearly held accountable

• And that they are made and unmade by voters rather than via back room deals.

Page 3: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

How FPP is supposed to deliver

• Discourages people from voting for third parties

• Does not give third parties seats• Gives the winner a clear ‘bonus’…• …irrespective of who that winner is

Page 4: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

Rise and Fall of the Two-Party Vote

Page 5: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

The Rise of ‘Others’

Page 6: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

The LD Vote – a little less even

Page 7: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

All Third Party Seats

Page 8: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

How FPP delivers a winner’s bonus

• Plenty of seats are competitive between Conservative and Labour.

• So if there is a small ‘swing’ from one to the other, lots of seats change hands.

• So even if the largest party only has a small lead in votes over the second party, it still secures an overall majority.

Page 9: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

The Decline in Marginal Seats

Page 10: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

Long-Term Variation in ‘Swing’

South Midlands North Scotland Wales

1955-87 +8.9 +5.9 -8.6 -19.1 +0.6

1987-97 -2.6 -2.3 +1.9 +7.4 +2.0

1997-2005

+1.1 +1.1 -0.9 -4.7 +1.5

2005-10 +0.6 +2.1 -0.4 -7.6 +0.7

Page 11: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

Potential Sources of Bias

• Unevenly sized constituencies– Differences in electorate size– Differences in turnout– (Differences in third party vote)

• More efficiently distributed vote– Win more seats by small majorities– (Waste more votes in third party seats)

Page 12: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

Trends in Overall Bias

Page 13: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

The Anti-Tory Bias

Con Lab

Electorate 72,345 68,612

Turnout 68.4 61.1

=> Voters 49,436 41,842

Small Majorities 60 81

Vote in Third Party Seats

28.4 16.6

Page 14: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

How The System Now (Doesn’t) Work

Con % Lead (GB)

Con Lab LD Others

-2.7 239 326 59 26

0.0 255 306 61 28

4.1 282 281 59 28

7.3 307 258 57 28

11.2 327 233 62 28

Page 15: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

How FPP no longer ‘works’

• No longer stops voters from supporting third parties

• Has become less effective at denying third parties representation

• Has become less effective at giving the winning party a ‘bonus’

• Is no longer even-handed in its treatment of the two largest parties

Page 16: So what happened to the electoral system in 2010? John Curtice Strathclyde University.

The Implications of the Constituencies Bill

• Will reduce but not eliminate the anti-Con bias– Boundaries will still be nearly 5 years out of date– Will not affect other sources of bias

• Unlikely significantly to change the range of results that produce a hung parliament

• Reduces accountability of MPs to constituents?