Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

85
1 Smart SRBI: Primary, Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Prevention Doug Fuchs Doug Fuchs Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University 2011 CREC Leadership Network 2011 CREC Leadership Network East Windsor, CT East Windsor, CT

description

Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention. Doug Fuchs Vanderbilt University 2011 CREC Leadership Network East Windsor, CT. I. Two Perspectives on RTI. Two Perspectives: An Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

Page 1: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

11

Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Preventionand Tertiary Prevention

Doug FuchsDoug Fuchs

Vanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt University

2011 CREC Leadership Network2011 CREC Leadership Network

East Windsor, CTEast Windsor, CT

Page 2: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

22

I. Two Perspectives on RTII. Two Perspectives on RTI

Page 3: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

33

Two Perspectives: An OverviewTwo Perspectives: An Overview

IDEA and NCLB perspectives with IDEA and NCLB perspectives with implications for assessment, instruction, and implications for assessment, instruction, and disability identificationdisability identification

IDEA: instruction is evidence-based, IDEA: instruction is evidence-based, standardized, and top-down. LD/BD exist. SE standardized, and top-down. LD/BD exist. SE should have a distinctive role in RTI.should have a distinctive role in RTI.

NCLB: instruction is bottom-up, driven by NCLB: instruction is bottom-up, driven by problem-solving, and recursive as necessary. problem-solving, and recursive as necessary. LD/BD do not exist. Blur SE.LD/BD do not exist. Blur SE.

Page 4: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

44

Touchstone of the IDEA ViewTouchstone of the IDEA View

““In determining whether a child has a specific In determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, a local ed agency may use learning disability, a local ed agency may use a process that determines if [he or she] a process that determines if [he or she] responds to scientific, research-based responds to scientific, research-based intervention as part of the evaluation process” intervention as part of the evaluation process” (P.L. 108-446(b) (6) (A and B).(P.L. 108-446(b) (6) (A and B).

Page 5: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

55

IDEA: RTI’s PurposeIDEA: RTI’s Purpose

RTI should promote both early intervention RTI should promote both early intervention and more valid methods of disability and more valid methods of disability identification. These two aims are inextricably identification. These two aims are inextricably connected.connected.

Page 6: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

66

IDEA: GE InstructionIDEA: GE Instruction

Evidence-based, explicit, and top-down.Evidence-based, explicit, and top-down.

Primary prevention: “research principled” Primary prevention: “research principled” core curricula and evidence-based class-wide core curricula and evidence-based class-wide instructional programs (e.g., DI, PALS, instructional programs (e.g., DI, PALS, CIRC).CIRC).

Secondary prevention: Small-group tutoring Secondary prevention: Small-group tutoring with validated standard protocols.with validated standard protocols.

Page 7: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

77

IDEA Secondary Prevention: IDEA Secondary Prevention: Instruction is the “Test”Instruction is the “Test”

Secondary prevention (like primary prevention) Secondary prevention (like primary prevention) should (a) accelerate the progress of at-risk students should (a) accelerate the progress of at-risk students and (b) identify NRs who are candidates for multi-and (b) identify NRs who are candidates for multi-disciplinary team evaluation for special education.disciplinary team evaluation for special education.

Small-group tutoring is a test. Like all tests, the Small-group tutoring is a test. Like all tests, the tutoring protocol should be standard, replicable, and tutoring protocol should be standard, replicable, and implemented with fidelity.implemented with fidelity.

Without such standardization comparing students to Without such standardization comparing students to each other in a school is impossible.each other in a school is impossible.

Page 8: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

88

Advantages and Disadvantages of Advantages and Disadvantages of the Standard Protocolthe Standard Protocol

Advantages: Standard, tutoring protocols can be Advantages: Standard, tutoring protocols can be research-based and relatively easy to scale up.research-based and relatively easy to scale up.

Disadvantages: A limited number of them. Spelling? Disadvantages: A limited number of them. Spelling? Writing? Algebra? Writing? Algebra?

They can insult teachers’ and specialists’ sense of They can insult teachers’ and specialists’ sense of professionalism because they suggest others know professionalism because they suggest others know more than they do about instruction.more than they do about instruction.

2% to 6% of the general population do not respond 2% to 6% of the general population do not respond to evidence-based tutoring in researcher-conducted to evidence-based tutoring in researcher-conducted studies.studies.

Page 9: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

99

NCLB ViewNCLB View

Uniformally challenging standards for all.Uniformally challenging standards for all.

Assessments are aligned with standards.Assessments are aligned with standards.

Virtually all (including most SWD) participate in the Virtually all (including most SWD) participate in the assessments.assessments.

Student performance is the basis of accountability.Student performance is the basis of accountability.

Standards will close the achievement gap and Standards will close the achievement gap and eliminate nearly all high-incidence SWD.eliminate nearly all high-incidence SWD.

GE and SE need to merge (“blurring” SE).GE and SE need to merge (“blurring” SE).

Page 10: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1010

NCLB: Problem SolvingNCLB: Problem Solving

Problem solving is the engine of instruction at Problem solving is the engine of instruction at the various tiers.the various tiers.

Multiple meanings of problem solving:Multiple meanings of problem solving:− Differentiated instructionDifferentiated instruction

− Team collaboration (e.g. Teacher Assistance Team collaboration (e.g. Teacher Assistance Teams, Instructional Support Teams)Teams, Instructional Support Teams)

− Behavioral ConsultationBehavioral Consultation

Page 11: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1111

Achilles Heel: Achilles Heel: Absence of Intensive InstructionAbsence of Intensive Instruction

IDEA: Relies on the traditional continuum of IDEA: Relies on the traditional continuum of SE placements and services; ignores the SE placements and services; ignores the weakening of SE instruction in schools.weakening of SE instruction in schools.

NCLB: SE is blurred in GE and places too NCLB: SE is blurred in GE and places too much confidence in unvalidated problem much confidence in unvalidated problem solving for children with severe learning solving for children with severe learning problems. I will return to this point.problems. I will return to this point.

Page 12: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1212

My Bias Is An IDEA PerspectiveMy Bias Is An IDEA Perspective

RTI should stand for both RTI should stand for both preventionprevention and a and a more valid method of more valid method of disability identificationdisability identification..

Fewer tiers of instruction.Fewer tiers of instruction. Standard protocols over problem solving Standard protocols over problem solving

(except at the most intensive level).(except at the most intensive level). High-incidence disabilities existHigh-incidence disabilities exist Intensive instruction (SE?) must be part of Intensive instruction (SE?) must be part of

RTI.RTI.

Page 13: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1313

II. RTI Framework:II. RTI Framework:Typical PracticeTypical Practice

Page 14: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1414

Levels of PreventionLevels of Prevention

Tiers vs. levels of prevention.Tiers vs. levels of prevention.

Primary, secondary, and tertiary levels.Primary, secondary, and tertiary levels.

Page 15: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1515

Typical RTI: Primary PreventionTypical RTI: Primary PreventionTypical RTI: Primary PreventionTypical RTI: Primary Prevention

• Instruction based on research principles

• All children receive the universal, core instruction in the mainstream classroom.

• Use of classwide instructional programs.

• All children are screened once in early fall.

• Students falling below a cut-point are identified as “at-risk” for academic failure and move to secondary prevention.

Page 16: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1616

Typical RTI: Secondary PreventionTypical RTI: Secondary Prevention

Secondary prevention: Research-validated standard treatment (tutoring) protocol.

− Students’ progress is monitored during tutoring.

− “Dual-discrepancy” criteria, or other criteria, help identify non-responders.

− Responders return to classroom instruction with ongoing monitoring.

Page 17: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1717

Example of Secondary Example of Secondary Prevention in NashvillePrevention in Nashville

~ In 42 First-Grade Classes in 10 ~ In 42 First-Grade Classes in 10 Metro-Nashville Schools ~Metro-Nashville Schools ~

Page 18: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1818

Tutoring OverviewTutoring Overview

Small groups (groups of two to four students)Small groups (groups of two to four students)

4 times per week outside classrooms 4 times per week outside classrooms

Each session: Each session:

− 45 min of tutor-led scripted instruction45 min of tutor-led scripted instruction 10 minutes of sight words practice10 minutes of sight words practice

5 minutes of letter sounds practice5 minutes of letter sounds practice

15 minutes of decoding practice15 minutes of decoding practice

15 minutes of reading fluency practice15 minutes of reading fluency practice

Page 19: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

1919

Tutoring LessonTutoring Lesson Steps included in the Steps included in the Sounds, Sight Words, and Decodable WordsSounds, Sight Words, and Decodable Words activities: activities:

− Introducing new sound or wordIntroducing new sound or word− Choral practiceChoral practice− Individual practiceIndividual practice

2 opportunities to produce correct sounds or words2 opportunities to produce correct sounds or words

− Writing practiceWriting practice

Reading Reading activitiesactivities− Choral reading of previous storyChoral reading of previous story

Echoing the tutor, one line at a timeEchoing the tutor, one line at a time Choral reading of story Choral reading of story

− Choral reading of new storyChoral reading of new story Echoing the tutor, one line at a timeEchoing the tutor, one line at a time Choral reading of storyChoral reading of story

− Individual speed readingIndividual speed reading Each student reads new story 3 times, for 30 secondsEach student reads new story 3 times, for 30 seconds Opportunity to earn incentives for increasing reading fluencyOpportunity to earn incentives for increasing reading fluency

Page 20: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2020

Topic Mastery/ReviewTopic Mastery/Review

Mastery of the topic was assessed each day. Mastery of the topic was assessed each day. If every student in the group achieved mastery of sight If every student in the group achieved mastery of sight

words on the first day of that set, the group moved to the words on the first day of that set, the group moved to the next set on the following day.next set on the following day.

Each student had two trials to master sight words during the Each student had two trials to master sight words during the session.session.

The group progressed to the next set regardless of mastery The group progressed to the next set regardless of mastery status after two sessions on the same set.status after two sessions on the same set.− To ensure that the group would be able to cover more To ensure that the group would be able to cover more

words and soundswords and sounds

Page 21: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2121

Sequence of Sounds and WordsSequence of Sounds and Words

Page 22: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2222

Sequence of Sounds and WordsSequence of Sounds and Words

Page 23: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2323

Sequence of Sounds and WordsSequence of Sounds and Words

Page 24: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2424

Tutoring Fidelity ChecklistTutoring Fidelity Checklist

Page 25: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2525

Typical RTI: Tertiary PreventionTypical RTI: Tertiary Prevention

NRs to secondary prevention either stay there NRs to secondary prevention either stay there despite poor progress, or they move to tertiary despite poor progress, or they move to tertiary (SE), which often means back to GE with (SE), which often means back to GE with accomodations/modifications.accomodations/modifications.

NLTS: 40% of teachers of LD students do not NLTS: 40% of teachers of LD students do not know students’ instructional needs; 11% of know students’ instructional needs; 11% of these students get modifications.these students get modifications.

NLTS: Majority of high school LD students 3 NLTS: Majority of high school LD students 3 or more grade levels behind.or more grade levels behind.

Page 26: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2626

III. Challenges to III. Challenges to Typical RTI PracticeTypical RTI Practice

Page 27: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2727

Challenges for Primary PreventionChallenges for Primary Prevention

Curricula are based on principles from Curricula are based on principles from research; not research-validated.research; not research-validated.

Quality control at district level in choice of Quality control at district level in choice of curricula.curricula.

Professional development.Professional development.

One-stage screening for “at-risk” produces One-stage screening for “at-risk” produces too many false positives.too many false positives.

Page 28: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2828

Challenges for Secondary Challenges for Secondary PreventionPrevention

Too many children.Too many children. Quality control of choice of tutoring Quality control of choice of tutoring

protocols.protocols. Professional development for tutors.Professional development for tutors. Duration of secondary prevention.Duration of secondary prevention. Must all students with severe learning Must all students with severe learning

problems pass thru secondary or should they problems pass thru secondary or should they proceed directly to tertiary prevention?proceed directly to tertiary prevention?

Page 29: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

2929

Challenges for Tertiary PreventionChallenges for Tertiary Prevention

The “blurring” of special education.The “blurring” of special education.

Modifications and accommodations are not Modifications and accommodations are not intensive enough for children with severe intensive enough for children with severe learning problems.learning problems.

Millions of SWD are not learning. (NLTS-1 Millions of SWD are not learning. (NLTS-1 and NLTS-2.)and NLTS-2.)

Page 30: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3030

IV. A Primer on CBMIV. A Primer on CBM

Teachers assess students’ academic performance, using brief Teachers assess students’ academic performance, using brief measures.measures.

Each alternate form of the CBM test assesses performance Each alternate form of the CBM test assesses performance on a measure of what is expected by end of year.on a measure of what is expected by end of year.

The CBM score is viewed as an indicator of overall The CBM score is viewed as an indicator of overall performance.performance.

Major RTI purposesMajor RTI purposes− To designate risk (measured on 1 occasion near beginning of the To designate risk (measured on 1 occasion near beginning of the

year)year)

− To describe rate of response to instruction (measured weekly on To describe rate of response to instruction (measured weekly on alternate forms, with a slope of improvement calculated)alternate forms, with a slope of improvement calculated)

Page 31: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3131

What We Look For in CBMWhat We Look For in CBM

INCREASING SCORES: INCREASING SCORES:

SStudent is responding to the tudent is responding to the instructional program.instructional program.

FLAT SCORES:FLAT SCORES:

SStudent is not responding to the tudent is not responding to the instruction program.instruction program.

Page 32: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3232

Sarah’s Progress on Words Sarah’s Progress on Words Read CorrectlyRead Correctly

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Wo

rds

Re

ad C

orr

ect

ly

Sarah Smith Reading 2

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

Page 33: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3333

Jessica’s Progress on Words Read Jessica’s Progress on Words Read CorrectlyCorrectly

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Wo

rds

Re

ad C

orr

ect

ly

Jessica Jones Reading 2

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

Page 34: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3434

CBM Indicators of CBM Indicators of Reading CompetenceReading Competence

Kindergarten: Letter-Sound FluencyKindergarten: Letter-Sound Fluency

Grade 1: Word-Identification FluencyGrade 1: Word-Identification Fluency

Grades 2-3: Grades 2-3: Passage Reading FluencyPassage Reading Fluency

Grades 4-6: Maze FluencyGrades 4-6: Maze Fluency

Page 35: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3535

KindergartenKindergartenLetter-Sound FluencyLetter-Sound Fluency

Teacher: Teacher: Say the sound Say the sound that goes with each that goes with each letter.letter.

Time: 1 minuteTime: 1 minute

p U z u yp U z u y

i t R e wi t R e w

O a s d fO a s d f

v g j S hv g j S h

k m n b Vk m n b V

Y E i c xY E i c x……

Page 36: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3636

Grade 1Grade 1Word-Identification FluencyWord-Identification Fluency

Teacher: Teacher: Read these Read these wordswords..

Time: 1 minute.Time: 1 minute.

twotwo

forfor

comecome

becausebecause

lastlast

fromfrom ......

Page 37: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3737

Grades 2-3 Grades 2-3 Passage Reading FluencyPassage Reading Fluency

Number of words read aloud correctly Number of words read aloud correctly in 1 minute on end-of-year passagesin 1 minute on end-of-year passages

Page 38: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3838

Jason Fry ran home from school. He had to pack his

clothes. He was going to the beach. He packed a swimsuit and

shorts. He packed tennis shoes and his toys. The Fry family was

going to the beach in Florida.

The next morning Jason woke up early. He helped Mom

and Dad pack the car, and his sister, Lonnie, helped too. Mom and

Dad sat in the front seat. They had maps of the beach. Jason sat in

the middle seat with his dog, Ruffie. Lonnie sat in the back and

played with her toys.

They had to drive for a long time. Jason looked out the

window. He saw farms with animals. Many farms had cows and

pigs but some farms had horses. He saw a boy riding a horse.

Jason wanted to ride a horse, too. He saw rows of corn growing in

the fields. Then Jason saw rows of trees. They were orange trees.

He sniffed their yummy smell. Lonnie said she could not wait to

taste one. Dad stopped at a fruit market by the side of the road.

He bought them each an orange.

CBM CBM passage passage for for Correct Correct Words Words Per Per MinuteMinute

Page 39: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

3939

CBM Passage Reading FluencyCBM Passage Reading Fluency Not interested in making kids read fasterNot interested in making kids read faster Interested in kids becoming better readersInterested in kids becoming better readers The CBM score is an overall indicator of reading The CBM score is an overall indicator of reading

competencecompetence Students who score high on CBMStudents who score high on CBM

− Are better decodersAre better decoders− Are better at sight vocabularyAre better at sight vocabulary− Are better comprehendersAre better comprehenders

Correlates highly with high-stakes testsCorrelates highly with high-stakes tests

Page 40: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4040

Grades 4-6 Grades 4-6 Maze FluencyMaze Fluency

Number of words replaced correctly in Number of words replaced correctly in 2.5 minutes on end-of-year passages 2.5 minutes on end-of-year passages from which every 7from which every 7thth word has been word has been deleted and replaced with 3 choicesdeleted and replaced with 3 choices

Page 41: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4141

Computer MazeComputer Maze

Page 42: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4242

CBM Indicators of CBM Indicators of Math CompetenceMath Competence

At each grade level, the items on the test At each grade level, the items on the test systematically sample the skills expected for systematically sample the skills expected for mastery at the end of the year.mastery at the end of the year.

Page 43: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4343

Page 44: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4444

Page 45: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4545

Page 46: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4646

Page 47: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4747

Page 48: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4848

Page 49: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

4949

V. Smart Primary and V. Smart Primary and Secondary PreventionSecondary Prevention

Page 50: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5050

Smart Primary Prevention: Smart Primary Prevention: Identifying At-Risk StudentsIdentifying At-Risk Students

All students are tested once in the fall.All students are tested once in the fall.

Students scoring below a cut-score are Students scoring below a cut-score are designated at risk.designated at risk.

For these at-risk students, response to GE is For these at-risk students, response to GE is monitored using CBM.monitored using CBM.

Page 51: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5151

Smart Primary Prevention: Smart Primary Prevention: Finding At-Risk StudentsFinding At-Risk Students

Administer weekly CBM to all at-risk Administer weekly CBM to all at-risk students for 5 weeks.students for 5 weeks.

At end of 5 weeks, identify children whose At end of 5 weeks, identify children whose slope (rate of improvement) is inadequate.slope (rate of improvement) is inadequate.

These students enter Tier 2.These students enter Tier 2.

Page 52: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5252

Smart Secondary Prevention: Smart Secondary Prevention: The Non-RespondersThe Non-Responders

Dual Discrepancy: Slope and LevelDual Discrepancy: Slope and Level Administer weekly CBM to tutored students Administer weekly CBM to tutored students

each week during Tier 2 tutoring.each week during Tier 2 tutoring. At end of tutoring, identify children whose At end of tutoring, identify children whose

slope (rate of improvement) and final level slope (rate of improvement) and final level are inadequate.are inadequate.

These students receive the multi-disciplinary These students receive the multi-disciplinary evaluation.evaluation.

Page 53: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5353

VI. Smart Tertiary PreventionVI. Smart Tertiary Prevention

Page 54: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5454

““Preventing” What?Preventing” What?

In health care, what is your internist trying to In health care, what is your internist trying to prevent? prevent?

What are we trying to prevent by using RTI?What are we trying to prevent by using RTI? SE referrals and placements?SE referrals and placements? Or, dropping out of school, unemployment, Or, dropping out of school, unemployment,

incarceration, poor health…?incarceration, poor health…? We need a “unified” approach to RTI, that includes a We need a “unified” approach to RTI, that includes a

reformed GE and SE, to increase all children’s reformed GE and SE, to increase all children’s quality of life.quality of life.

Page 55: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5555

Smart Tertiary PreventionSmart Tertiary Prevention Tertiary Prevention: Individualized, Data-based, Recursive

− Non-responders to secondary prevention are evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and are identified for SE.

− Tertiary prevention:Student goals are individualized and ambitious.Progress monitoring is used to “formatively” (or

“recursively”) develop effective programs.Progress monitoring is used to determine whether and

when students meet benchmarks and should re-enter secondary or primary prevention

Page 56: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

Smart Tertiary Prevention

Comprehensive service delivery like Gawande’s “full spectrum” health care.

Schools implementing RTI need specialists with expertise, not generalists, to make it work.

Page 57: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5757

Determine Whether Grade-Level Determine Whether Grade-Level Material is Appropriate for PM at Material is Appropriate for PM at

Tertiary PreventionTertiary Prevention

1. Administer three passages at grade level:1. Administer three passages at grade level:− Fewer than 10 correct words, use Word Fewer than 10 correct words, use Word

Identification FluencyIdentification Fluency

− Between 10 and 50 words, but less than 85–90% Between 10 and 50 words, but less than 85–90% correct, move to next lower level of test and correct, move to next lower level of test and administer three passages at this leveladminister three passages at this level

2. Maintain appropriate level for entire year.2. Maintain appropriate level for entire year.

Page 58: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5858

Set An Ambitious GoalSet An Ambitious Goal

Format of CBM Goal SettingFormat of CBM Goal Setting Current Performance LevelCurrent Performance Level

Given passages representing 3Given passages representing 3rdrd-grade material, Kelsey -grade material, Kelsey reads 43 words correct in 1 minute.reads 43 words correct in 1 minute.

GoalGoalGiven passages representing 3Given passages representing 3rdrd-grade material, students -grade material, students

will read 100 words correct in 1 minute.will read 100 words correct in 1 minute.

ObjectiveObjectiveEach week, given passages representing 3Each week, given passages representing 3rdrd-grade material, -grade material,

students will read 2 additional words correct in 1 minute.students will read 2 additional words correct in 1 minute.

Page 59: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

5959

Reading Graph for Kelsey

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

. 4-Oct

5-Oct

6-Oct

11-Oct

13-Oct

18-Oct

20-Oct

25-Oct

27-Oct

2-Nov

4-Nov

9-Nov

11-Nov

16-Nov

18-Nov

1-Dec

3-Dec

8-Dec

10-Dec

Date

Nu

mb

er o

f w

ord

s re

ad c

orr

ectl

y in

1 m

inu

te

Baseline

Goal Line

Page 60: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6060

CBM Goal Setting:CBM Goal Setting:Three OptionsThree Options

1.1. Norms for end-of-year performanceNorms for end-of-year performance

2.2. Norms for weekly rate of improvement (slope)Norms for weekly rate of improvement (slope)

3.3. Intra-individual frameworkIntra-individual framework

Page 61: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6161

Setting IEP Goals:Setting IEP Goals:Norms for End-of-Year PerformanceNorms for End-of-Year Performance

1.1. Identify appropriate end-of-year grade-Identify appropriate end-of-year grade-level norm.level norm.

2.2. Mark end-of-year norm on student Mark end-of-year norm on student graph with an X.graph with an X.

3.3. Find median of first 3 CBM scores.Find median of first 3 CBM scores.

4.4. To draw goal line, connect median with To draw goal line, connect median with X.X.

Page 62: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6262

Setting IEP Goals:Setting IEP Goals:Norms for End-of-Year PerformanceNorms for End-of-Year Performance

GradeGrade ReadingReading ComputationComputation Concepts andConcepts and ApplicationsApplications

KindergartenKindergarten 40 sounds/minute (LSF)40 sounds/minute (LSF) ------ ------

Grade 1Grade 1 60 words/minute (WIF)60 words/minute (WIF) 20 digits20 digits 20 points20 points

Grade 2Grade 2 75 words/minute (PRF)75 words/minute (PRF) 20 digits20 digits 20 points20 points

Grade 3Grade 3 100 words/minute (PRF)100 words/minute (PRF) 30 digits30 digits 30 points30 points

Grade 4Grade 4 20 replacements/2.5 minutes20 replacements/2.5 minutes(Maze)(Maze)

40 digits40 digits 30 points30 points

Grade 5Grade 5 25 replacements/2.5 minutes25 replacements/2.5 minutes (Maze)(Maze)

30 digits30 digits 15 points15 points

Grade 6Grade 6 30 replacements/2.5 minutes30 replacements/2.5 minutes(Maze)(Maze)

35 digits35 digits 15 points15 points

Note: These figures may change pending additional research.

Page 63: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6363

Sam’s Case Study Sam’s Case Study Sam developed sizeable reading deficits in by the end of 2Sam developed sizeable reading deficits in by the end of 2ndnd grade. grade.

In 3In 3rdrd grade, he was identified as having a reading disability. grade, he was identified as having a reading disability. His tutor, Mrs. Hayes, implemented the Orton program but with His tutor, Mrs. Hayes, implemented the Orton program but with

limited success. His weekly CBM performance demonstrated limited success. His weekly CBM performance demonstrated inadequate slope and inadequate final level.inadequate slope and inadequate final level.

Mrs. Hayes concluded that Sam’s response to the validated, Mrs. Hayes concluded that Sam’s response to the validated, standard tutoring protocol was inadequate and that he required an standard tutoring protocol was inadequate and that he required an individualized program.individualized program.

Given his large reading deficits, Mrs. Hayes set his IEP goal as Given his large reading deficits, Mrs. Hayes set his IEP goal as competent 2competent 2ndnd-grade performance at the end of 3-grade performance at the end of 3rdrd grade. grade.

− Rationale: The 2Rationale: The 2ndnd-grade curriculum is similar to the 3-grade curriculum is similar to the 3rdrd-grade -grade reading curriculum, but includes less challenging reading reading curriculum, but includes less challenging reading skills that create a basis for learning harder, third-grade skills that create a basis for learning harder, third-grade reading skills.reading skills.

Page 64: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6464

Sam’s Case Study Sam’s Case Study

Mrs. Hayes used CBM to slowly build an effective Mrs. Hayes used CBM to slowly build an effective individualized reading program.individualized reading program.

She began with Orton, but conducted sessions twice She began with Orton, but conducted sessions twice daily, each time for 30 minutes, on a 1:1 basis.daily, each time for 30 minutes, on a 1:1 basis.

She also implemented CBM. Each weekly test of She also implemented CBM. Each weekly test of passage reading fluency assessed overall competence passage reading fluency assessed overall competence in the 2in the 2ndnd-grade reading curriculum.-grade reading curriculum.

Each weekly score was an overall indicator of Each weekly score was an overall indicator of reading competence at 2reading competence at 2ndnd grade. grade.

Page 65: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6565

Passage Reading FluencyPassage Reading Fluency

Number of words read Number of words read correctly in 1 minutecorrectly in 1 minute

Page 66: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6666

Reading Graph for Sam

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Date

Nu

mb

er o

f w

ord

s re

ad c

orr

ectl

y in

1 m

inu

te

Baseline

Goal Line

Page 67: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6767

CBM Decision-Making FrameworkCBM Decision-Making Framework

Trend-Line RuleTrend-Line Rule

If 4 weeks of instruction have occurred AND at least If 4 weeks of instruction have occurred AND at least 8 data points have been collected, draw a trend line 8 data points have been collected, draw a trend line through most recent 8 scores. Compare this trend through most recent 8 scores. Compare this trend line against the goal line.line against the goal line.

− If trend line is steeper than goal line, raise goal.If trend line is steeper than goal line, raise goal.− If trend line is less steep than goal line, make a teaching If trend line is less steep than goal line, make a teaching

change.change.

Page 68: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6868

What Is the Data-Based What Is the Data-Based Decision Rule?Decision Rule?

G

Make an instructional change.

T

Page 69: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

6969

Reading Graph for Sam

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Date

Nu

mb

er o

f w

ord

s re

ad c

orr

ectl

y in

1 m

inu

te

Baseline

Goal Line

Page 70: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7070

Use Goal to Monitoring Progress and Formatively Use Goal to Monitoring Progress and Formatively

Evaluating the Instructional Program: Evaluating the Instructional Program: Enhancing Student OutcomesEnhancing Student Outcomes

Most important aspect of CBM:Most important aspect of CBM:USE THE DATA!!!USE THE DATA!!!

We don’t throw out the base program but we We don’t throw out the base program but we build upon it.build upon it.

The following instructional elements may be The following instructional elements may be altered to enhance student performance:altered to enhance student performance:

− Instructional componentsInstructional components− Size of instructional groupSize of instructional group− Time allocated for instructionTime allocated for instruction− Materials usedMaterials used− ReinforcementReinforcement

Page 71: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7171

Instructional Interventions for Progress Monitoring Documentation

Date Instructional Strategies (Procedures and Skills)

Size of Instructional Group (# Teachers:

# Students)

Allocated Instructional Time

and Frequency

Instructional Resources (Curriculum, Level,

Materials)

Reinforcement Strategies (Optional)

Page 72: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7272

Sam: Time to Make A ChangeSam: Time to Make A Change

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Date

Nu

mb

er

of

wo

rds r

ead

co

rrectl

y in

1 m

inu

te

Baseline

Goal Line

Initial Instruction

Instructional Change

Page 73: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7373

SamSam To determine the nature of the instructional change for To determine the nature of the instructional change for

Sam, Mrs. Hayes conducts a Quick Miscue Analysis Sam, Mrs. Hayes conducts a Quick Miscue Analysis during Sam’s next CBM testing. during Sam’s next CBM testing.

The Quick Miscue Analysis represents one strategy for The Quick Miscue Analysis represents one strategy for conducting a diagnostic analysis of Sam’s reading conducting a diagnostic analysis of Sam’s reading strategies and gaining insight into productive strategies and gaining insight into productive directions for supplementing the Orton program and directions for supplementing the Orton program and for building Sam’s individualized program.for building Sam’s individualized program.

Page 74: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7474

Larry was very excited! His father 6

had just brought home a new puppy. Larry’s 14

brother and sister were going to be very 22

surprised, too. 24

The little puppy was black and brown 31

with a few white patches. Her ears were long 40

and floppy. Her tummy nearly touched the 47

ground. Dad said this dog was a beagle. 55

Larry thought their new dog was cute. 62

He couldn’t decide what he wanted to name 70

saw him (T provided)

our b

for much His hair was

pup blue

mother was much

sorpray

funny teeth were torn

growl our puppy boy

Page 75: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7575

Word WrittenWord Written Word Word SpokenSpoken

Grapho-Grapho-phonemicphonemic

SyntaxSyntax SemanticsSemantics

waswas sawsaw nono yesyes nono

veryvery himhim nono nono nono

excitedexcited ---------- nono nono nono

just just ourour nono nono nono

broughtbrought bb minimalminimal nono nono

brotherbrother mothermother yesyes yesyes nono

werewere waswas minimalminimal yesyes yesyes

veryvery muchmuch nono yesyes yesyes

surprisedsurprised sorpraysorpray yesyes nono nono

puppypuppy puppup yesyes yesyes yesyesQuick Miscue AnalysisQuick Miscue Analysis 30%30% 50%50% 30%30%

Page 76: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7676

Sam’s Instructional ChangeSam’s Instructional Change

Given Sam’s inadequate reliance on the semantics of Given Sam’s inadequate reliance on the semantics of the passage, Mrs. Hayes decides to introduce a tape the passage, Mrs. Hayes decides to introduce a tape recorder activity, whereby Sam will monitor recorder activity, whereby Sam will monitor semantic miscues in his own reading.semantic miscues in his own reading.

Given Sam’s poor use of grapho-phonemic strategies Given Sam’s poor use of grapho-phonemic strategies during his reading of the passage, Mrs. Hayes during his reading of the passage, Mrs. Hayes decides to conduct a diagnostic assessment of Sam’s decides to conduct a diagnostic assessment of Sam’s decoding skills.decoding skills.

Page 77: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7777

Decoding BatteryDecoding Battery

− 60 nonsense words60 nonsense words− Ordered from easiestOrdered from easiest− Basals and ceilings Basals and ceilings − 6 words for each of 10 decoding skills6 words for each of 10 decoding skills− Mastery criterion for each skill, at each grade Mastery criterion for each skill, at each grade − Student reads from paperStudent reads from paper− Teacher marks on computer, which prompts teacher re. Teacher marks on computer, which prompts teacher re.

basals/ceilingsbasals/ceilings− ComputerComputer

Codes each word as right/wrongCodes each word as right/wrong Sorts words into 10 skillsSorts words into 10 skills Applies mastery criteriaApplies mastery criteria Identifies 2 nonmastered skills at lowest point in developmental sequenceIdentifies 2 nonmastered skills at lowest point in developmental sequence

Page 78: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7878

Page 79: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

7979

Sam’s Instructional ChangeSam’s Instructional Change

With the results of the diagnostic decoding With the results of the diagnostic decoding assessment in hand, Mrs. Hayes decides to assessment in hand, Mrs. Hayes decides to target vowel teams for intensive review in and target vowel teams for intensive review in and out of contextualized reading.out of contextualized reading.

This emphasis along with the tape recorder This emphasis along with the tape recorder activity are added to the Orton program.activity are added to the Orton program.

Page 80: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

8080

Reading Graph for Sam

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Date

Nu

mb

er o

f w

ord

s re

ad c

orr

ectl

y in

1 m

inu

te

Baseline

Goal Line

Guided-reading

Guided-reading + decoding practice

Guided-reading + decoding practice + comprehension

Page 81: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

8181

Sam’s Next Instructional ChangeSam’s Next Instructional Change

After 7 additional weeks with this After 7 additional weeks with this instructional modification, Sam increases his instructional modification, Sam increases his rate of improvement but his trend line remains rate of improvement but his trend line remains less steep than his goal line.less steep than his goal line.

Mrs. Hayes decides to introduce a systematic Mrs. Hayes decides to introduce a systematic reinforcement program to reward on-task reinforcement program to reward on-task behavior and accurate work during tutoring. behavior and accurate work during tutoring.

Page 82: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

8282

In This Way …,In This Way …,

Mrs. Hayes continues this iterative process Mrs. Hayes continues this iterative process over time, using the data to formatively over time, using the data to formatively design an individualized program that works design an individualized program that works for Sam.for Sam.

Experimental studies show that when teachers Experimental studies show that when teachers use CBM in this way, they plan more use CBM in this way, they plan more differentiated and effective instruction for differentiated and effective instruction for students with severe learning problems. students with severe learning problems.

Page 83: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

8383

Effect Sizes for CBMEffect Sizes for CBM

1.2

0.75

0.6

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4E

ffec

t S

ize

Reading Math Spelling

Domain

Page 84: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

8484

Websites Worth VisitingWebsites Worth Visiting

RTI4success.orgRTI4success.org

Progressmonitoring.orgProgressmonitoring.org

Page 85: Smart SRBI: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Prevention

8585

Contact InformationContact Information

[email protected]

615-343-4782 or 322-8254615-343-4782 or 322-8254