Smart collections

31
Smart collections Pru Mitchell & Richard Leibbrandt [email protected] [email protected]

description

Presentation at International Association of School Librarianship Research Forum, describing a joint proof of concept project undertaken by researchers from the Flinders University Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in partnership with information managers from the Education Network Australia (edna) team at Education Services Australia to address the question of whether artificial intelligence techniques could be employed to help with creation and consistency of learning resource metadata and improve the efficiency of digital collection workflows?

Transcript of Smart collections

Page 1: Smart collections

Smart collections

Pru Mitchell & Richard [email protected]

[email protected]

Page 2: Smart collections

The goal

To describe resources for education so learners and educators can findthe right resource at the right time

Page 3: Smart collections

every reader his/her book

Ranganathan 1931, 5 principles of library science

Page 5: Smart collections
Page 6: Smart collections

Educational valueCurriculum relevance

Intended userEducational level

Educational quality

How can I use this for learning?

Page 8: Smart collections

Research questionCan artificial intelligence tools and techniques assist with discovering,

evaluating and tagging digital learning resources?

Page 9: Smart collections

Research partnersFlinders University

Artificial Intelligence and Language LabV.A.L.I.A.N.T.

Education Network Australia (edna)

Page 10: Smart collections

Proof of concept3 people$30,000

3 months 3 show and tells

blog for peer review

Page 11: Smart collections

Research team

Dr Richard LeibbrandtDr Dongqiang YangDarius PfitznerProf David Powers

Pru MitchellSarah HaymanHelen Eddy

Page 12: Smart collections

Technical conceptsartificial intelligence

text classification (TC)semantic annotation

Text Frequency/Inverse Document Frequency (TFIDF)

semantic webtaxonomy and folksonomy

Page 14: Smart collections

Key phrase extractiona (the full text document)

?

b (keywords, audience, userlevel)

Which terms in the text prompt this decision?

Page 17: Smart collections

Findingslabour-intensive challengesubject classification easier than userlevelaudience and user level indicated by

meaning, vocabulary, choice of words, style, font size, graphic elements, layout

‘reading’ web pages is a complex literacy

Page 18: Smart collections

Semantic network

Automated subject analysis

Can system predict edna category?Tools

WordNet Wikipedia Dbpedia

Page 21: Smart collections
Page 22: Smart collections

Findings% hits in top-ranked options when predicting edna category

%

Title only 35%Subject without broad term expansion 60%

Subject with broad term expansion 45%

Page 23: Smart collections

User terms to thesaurus

Schools Online Thesaurusscot.curriculum.edu.au

Can system predict ScOT terms from teacher keywords?

Page 24: Smart collections

User metadata

the only group that can categorize everything is everybody

Clay Shirky, 2005Ontology is overrated

Page 25: Smart collections

Mapping teacher tagsProper nouns & brands .NET, iPod, excelSemantic ambiguity notes → Pitch (Music)Stemming practice exams → Practical Examinations

Page 26: Smart collections

FindingsMapping approach RecallFull mapping 35.9%Partial mapping 43.1%Semantic mapping 22.8%

% ScOT terms predicted from keywords

Page 27: Smart collections

Benefits1. Efficiency of cataloguing through

classification suggestions2. Improved user experience through more

relevant and consistent search results3. Improved integration of user contributed

resources if tags are mapped to taxonomy

Page 28: Smart collections

ConclusionsArtificial intelligence systems showed some success in subject categorisation of text-based digital learning resources

Key phase extraction to support subject categorisation was more successful than of audience and user-level categorisation

Page 29: Smart collections

SummaryAutomated classification based on

artificial intelligence may be useful as a means of supplementing and

assisting human classification, but is not at this stage a replacement for

human classification

Page 30: Smart collections

Future ScOT developmentAchievement Standards NetworkMachine Readable CurriculaMultilingual thesauriOER ‘travelling well’ globally

Page 31: Smart collections

CreditsFoyer artwork 2008, State Library of South Australia

http://www.slsa.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=409 Climate change timeline, Copyright ABC

http://www.abc.net.au/environment/timeline.html Holeymoon 2008, Rent 1, 2, 3 CC-by-nc-sa

http://www.flickr.com/photos/holeymoon/2926989641 International Standard Book Number, Wikipedia, CC-by-sa

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Book_Number Leave your mark, Oxfam Australia

http://www.leaveyourmark.my3things.org O’Connor, D 2005 Binary Finary, CC-by-nc-sa

http://www.flickr.com/photos/clockwerx/9267076 Ranganathan, S 1931, The five laws of library science The Madras Library Association,

London: Goldston, MadrasYelkrokoyade 2010, Conservera de Lisboa , CC-sa

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Conservera_de_Lisboa.jpg