Small Grant Program Application Processing Information ...loafing. Around 1000ft of pipe will be...

2015-17 Small Grant Application JULY 2017 1

Small Grant Program

Application

2017-2019

I. General Information

OWEB Funds Requested (round to nearest dollar) $13,582 Total Project Cost $ 18,110

Name of Project (five words or fewer) Sevenmile Spring Developments

Project Location (if more than one, include location/landowner information on each map)

This project occurs at (check one): x A single site Multiple sites

Sevemile Watershed, tributary of McKay Creek Watershed

Umatilla County

2S33E5

45.416680, -118.708266

McKay Creek, 1707010304

1. Have you previously submitted an application to OWEB, either through the regular or small grant program,

for this project, or one similar to it on the same property? Yes Grant # x No

If yes, explain

2. Does this application propose a grant for a property in which OWEB previously invested funds for purchase

of fee title or a conservation easement; or is OWEB currently considering an acquisition grant for this property?

Yes Grant # x No

If yes, explain

II. Contact Information

Applicant Org.: Umatilla SWCD Tax ID: 93-0708539 Contact: Kyle Waggoner

Mailing Address: 1 SW Nye Ave Ste 130, Pendleton, Oregon Zip: 97801

Phone: 541-278-8049 ext. 138 Email: [email protected]

Landowner(s): Cunningham Sheep Co.

Landowner Address: 303 SE 3rd St, Pendleton, OR Zip: 97801

Phone: 541-276-6391 Email:

Project Manager for the Grantee: Kyle Waggoner

Project Manager Address: 1 SW Nye Ave Ste 130, Pendleton, Oregon Zip: 97801


Fiscal Agent Org.: Umatilla SWCD Tax ID: 93-0708539 Contact: Kyle Waggoner

Fiscal Agent Address: 1 SW Nye Ave Ste 130, Pendleton, Oregon Zip: 97801


Technical Contact: Kyle Waggoner Phone: 541-278-8049 ext. 138 Email: [email protected]

Application Processing Information (to be

completed by the Small Grant Team Contact):

Application #:

Date Received:

Date Acted On:

Recommended Denied

SGT Contact

Signature: __________________________


III. Project Information

Priority Watershed Concern: the project will address — Check One Only.

Instream Process & Function Riparian Process & Function Urban Impact Reduction

Wetland Process & Function Road Impact Reduction x Upland Process & Function

Fish Passage Water Quantity & Quality/ Irrigation Efficiency

Small Grant Team Priority Project Type(s) addressed by the project (list specific eligible project type):

High Priority-Upland Process and Function: Manage Nutrient and Sediment Inputs into streams

through the management of grazing and animal waste

1-a. Is the project consistent with the local watershed assessment or action plan?

x Yes Name primary assessment/plan Umatilla/Willow Subbasin Plan

No

N/A—The watershed does not yet have an assessment or action plan

1-b. Is the project consistent with the local Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan?

x Yes No

1-c. Is the project consistent with any developed plan for the property (e.g., local conservation or

stewardship)?

x Yes No

If yes, name the plan(s): CsTP

2. Describe the current watershed PROBLEM(s) you are seeking to address. The Sevenmile Watershed is located about 10 miles southeast of Pilot Rock, Oregon. Land use in the

watershed is exclusivley rangeland, as the tough terrain and rocky soil prevents any other forms of

agriculture. Currently, the landowner leases the land to cow/calf pairs in the summer, and rotates them

out in the winter. In this pasture, directly above Sevenmile's headwaters, there exists two springs. Because

they are in the bottom of the canyon, the cattle often loaf there more than they should, contaminating

the spring's output and destroying important native vegetation. Since these springs are a higher elevation

than Sevenmile, the excess spring water naturally makes its way down into the creek, both subsurface

and above ground. This of course leads to potential sediment and nutrient contamination of Sevenmile.

Sevenmile pours directly into Mckay Creek, home to Redband Trout, genetically identical to Steelhead.

The nutrients and sediment can often lead to take of these native fish.

3. Describe the SOLUTION(s) you are proposing to address the current problem(s). Attach a site

map, color photo(s), and (if applicable) preliminary project drawings or designs. By fencing off the spring sources and putting in two (2) 1,200 gallon troughs, the cattle (and local elk

population) will have plenty of water without having to get down into the riparian area. Both troughs will

be placed up and away from the sources, encouraging grazing distribution and preventing riparian

loafing. Around 1000ft of pipe will be used to complete this project, with an estiamted 500 ft of fencing to

protect the springs. Project will be designed to NRCS specifications.

4. Insurance Information

If applicable, select all the activities that are part of your project (check all that apply). You will be

required to submit the DAS Risk Assessment Tool for items 1-5:

1. Working with hazardous materials (not including materials used in the normal operation of

equipment such as hydraulic fluid)

2. Earth moving work around the footprint of a well


3. Aerial application of chemicals

4. Transporting individuals on the water

5. Removal or alteration of structures that hold back water on land or instream including dams,

levees, dikes, tidegates and other water control devices (this does not include temporary diversion

dams used solely to divert water for irrigation)

6. Applicant’s staff or volunteers are working with kids related to the project (DAS Risk assessment

tool not required, additional insurance is required)

7. Applicant’s staff are applying herbicides or pesticides (DAS Risk assessment tool not required,

additional insurance is required

OWEB considers these projects to carry a greater risk to the organization, organization's employees,

volunteers, and the community. If boxes 1-5 are checked above, the applicant must submit the DAS

Risk Assessment, http://www.oregon.gov/das/Risk/Pages/CntrctrInsReq.aspx, with this application.

Additional information regarding the insurance policy and requirements can be found here: http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/GRANTS/docs/insurance/Insurance-Requirements.pdf.

5. Technical Guidance Source (check at least one and identify the Practice Code, or page and

paragraph).

x NRCS Field Office Technical Guide

Practice Code 516, 574, 614, 382

Guide to Placing Large Wood in Streams

Page # / Para

Oregon Road/Stream Crossing Restoration

Guide

Page # / Para

Forest Practices Tech Note #4

Page # / Para

Nonpoint Source Pollution Control

Guidebook

Page # / Para

Forest Practices Tech Note #5

Page # / Para

Urban Subwatershed Restoration Manual

Page # / Para

Tribal Natural Resource Plans and Water Plans

(attach the relevant page or pages)

6. Maintenance and Post-Implementation Monitoring

a) Project maintenance is the responsibility of the landowner. What aspects of the project will be maintained? (See application instructions.)

Who will maintain? What will be maintained?

How will it be maintained?

# of years # of times/year

Landowner Springbox, Fence, Piping

Sight Verification 4

b) Post-implementation monitoring including photo points and visual inspection is required for small

grants (Year-Two Status Report). What (if any) additional aspects of the project will be monitored

post-implementation? (See application instructions)

Who will monitor? What will be monitored? Cite monitoring protocols

# of years # of times/year

http://www.oregon.gov/das/Risk/Pages/CntrctrInsReq.aspx

http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/GRANTS/docs/insurance/Insurance-Requirements.pdf


7. Who will be responsible for writing the Year-Two Status Report?

Name: Kyle Waggoner Org.: Umatilla SWCD

Mailing Address 1 SW Nye Ave Ste 130 Zip 97801


8. Have the required permits been obtained for the project? Yes No x Not Required

If yes, what permits have been issued? (Attach copies)

If no, what permits must be obtained and by when?

9. Is this project required as a condition of a local, state, or federal permit, order, or enforcement

action (e.g., a manure storage and management project required by ODA permit)?

Yes x No

10. Project Partners. Show all anticipated funding sources, and indicate the dollar value for cash or

in-kind contributions. Be sure to provide a dollar value for each funding source. If the funding

source is providing in-kind contributions, briefly describe the nature of the contribution in the

Funding Source Column. In the Amount/Value Column, provide a total dollar amount or value for

each funding source.

Funding Source

Name the partner and contribution

Cash In-Kind Amount/

Value

OWEB: 13,582 13,582

Landowner: 4,528 4,528

Total Estimated Funds (add all amounts in the far right column) 18,110$

The total should equal the total cost of the project on page 1


11. Project Budget (Word). Itemize projected costs for each budget category that apply to your

project. A minimum of 25% match is required. See application instructions and additional team

conditions for further guidance. PLEASE NOTE: Budgets may be submitted in either Word or Excel formats. Forms can be found here:

http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/GRANTS/smgrant_forms.shtml

Fill in the amounts, rounded to the nearest dollar; please do not include cents.

Expense Category

No. of

Units Unit Cost

OWEB

Funds

Match

Funds (In-Kind/Cash)

Description--what will be purchased

and by whom/who will perform the

work.

SALARIES, WAGES, AND BENEFITS. Refers to in-house staff/applicant employees for whom payroll taxes are paid. List

position titles; include only costs of employees charged to this grant. $0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL (1) $0 $0

CONTRACTED SERVICES. Labor, supplies, materials and travel to be provided by non-staff for project implementation.

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL (2) $0 $0

MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES. Refers to items that are purchased by or invoiced to the applicant, and are “used up” in

the course of the project. Costs to OWEB must be directly related to the implementation of this grant.

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL (3) $0 $0

TRAVEL. Mileage. For current rates go to: http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/Pages/forms_linked.aspx#

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL (4) $0 $0

OTHER. Land use signature costs, project permit costs, small equipment repair, commercial equipment rental.

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

SUBTOTAL (5) $0 $0

MODIFIED TOTAL DIRECT COST (MTDC) (Add Subtotals 1-5)

$0 $0

INDIRECT COSTS. Not to exceed 10% of Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC). Compute by multiplying MTDC by 0.10 or

less. See the current Budget Categories Definitions document for eligible costs.

http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/Pages/forms_linked.aspx#

Indirect Costs Not to exceed

10% of MTDC $0 $0

POST-GRANT

Year-Two Status Report $0 $0 (Not to exceed $200)

Post-Project Plant Establishment $0 $0 (Not to exceed $1,000)

PROJECT TOTALS $0 $0 (Not to exceed $15,000 in OWEB funds)

http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/GRANTS/smgrant_forms.shtml

http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/Pages/forms_linked.aspx




We, the undersigned, attest that to the best of our knowledge the information contained in this

application is true, that the proposed project is not required by a state or federal agency directive, and

that the project will be completed within 24 months from the date of the team funding

recommendation of the application. We understand that the submitted application is a matter of

public record.

Also, should funding for this project be awarded we understand:

1) We may not incur any project expenses until all designated signatories have signed an OWEB grant

agreement,

2) We will be required to provide proper accounting of project expenses, and

3) We will be required to provide necessary and normal maintenance to sustain the value of the

project once it is completed.

By their signatures, the landowner(s) attest that they have no plans to sell their property as of the date of

this application, are authorized to sign as landowner, and they agree to provide, upon prior request and

at a mutually acceptable time, site access to the applicant or representatives of OWEB for a period up

to two years following project completion to allow project work to be implemented, monitored, and

maintained.

________________________________________________________

Applicant Date

_________________________________________________________

Landowner Date

_________________________________________________________

Fiscal Agent Date

Attachment Checklist

x Project location map (Required)

x Color photographs of site (Required)

x Site drawings/diagrams (if applicable)

Juniper Checklist (if applicable)

Cooperative agreement, if 2 or more

landowners (Optional) May be submitted in

lieu of ALL Landowner signatures on

Application ALL Landowners must sign the

Grant Agreement

x Racial and Ethnic Impact Statement

(Required)

x Restoration Metrics form (Required)

Other materials (as required by team)

Optional Forms At Application Stage

(Required at the time of Request for Release

of Funds, see instructions)

Irrigation Efficiency

Culvert/Stream Crossing

Secured Match

Land Use


Racial and Ethnic Impact Statement This form is used for information purposes only and must be included with the

grant application.

Chapter 600 of the 2013 Oregon Laws require applicants to include with each grant application a racial and

ethnic impact statement. The statement provides information as to the disproportionate or unique impact the

proposed policies or programs may have on minority persons1 in the State of Oregon if the grant is awarded to

a corporation or other legal entity other than natural persons.

1. □ The proposed grant project policies or programs could have a disproportionate or unique

positive impact on the following minority persons:

Indicate all that apply:

Women

Persons with Disabilities

African-Americans

Hispanics

Asians or Pacific Islanders

American Indians

Alaskan Natives

2. □ The proposed grant project policies or programs could have a disproportionate or unique

negative impact on the following minority persons:

Indicate all that apply:

Women

Persons with Disabilities

African-Americans

Hispanics

Asians or Pacific Islanders

American Indians

Alaskan Natives

3. □ The proposed grant project policies or programs will have no disproportionate or unique impact on

minority persons.

If you checked numbers 1 or 2 above, on a separate sheet of paper, provide the rationale for the existence of

policies or programs having a disproportionate or unique impact on minority persons in this state. Further

provide evidence of consultation with representative(s) of the affected minority persons.

I HEREBY CERTIFY on this 14thday of November, 2017, the information contained on this form and any

attachment is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Signature

Printed Name:Kyle Waggoner

Title:District Manager

1 “Minority persons” are defined in SB 463 (2013 Regular Session) as women, persons with disabilities (as defined

in ORS 174.107), African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians or Pacific Islanders, American Indians and Alaskan

Natives.


Restoration Metrics Form

OWEB receives a portion of its funds from the federal government and is required to report how its grantees have used both federal and state funds. The information you provide in the following form will be used for federal and state reporting purposes.

Please complete all portions of the form below as they apply to your project and submit all pages (do not exclude any pages). Please provide specific values, do not enter values like “2-3” or “<100”. Enter your best approximation of what the project will accomplish.

If you have any questions, please contact Cecilia Noyes, OWEB Federal Reporting Coordinator, at 503-986-0204 ([email protected]) or Ginger Lofftus, OWEB PCSRF Reporting Assistant, at 503-986-5372 ([email protected])

Section 1. Project Overview Answer all five questions below, even if you have answered a similar question in a previous section in the grant application.

1. Land Use Setting: CHECK ONE BOX ONLY.

Urban/Suburban/Exurban (Projects located within urban growth boundaries or rural residential areas)

Rural (Projects located outside urban growth boundaries or rural residential areas.)

2. Dominant Watershed Setting: CHECK ONE BOX ONLY. Example: Your project involves managing erosion in the upland area with some erosion control extended to the riparian area. Because most of the work is to occur in the upland area, you would check only the Upland box below.

Estuary (where freshwater meets and mixes with saltwater of ocean tides.)

Riparian (adjacent to a water body, within the active floodplain.)

Instream (below the ordinary high-water mark or within the active channel — includes fish passage.)

Upland (above the floodplain.)

Groundwater (Projects that recharge groundwater or primarily affect the subsurface water table.)

Wetland (areas inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.

3. Total Acres Treated: 7 Total Stream Miles Treated: (do not include upstream stream miles made accessible to fish with passage improvements)

4. Project Monitoring: All OWEB funded restoration projects require post-implementation status reporting

including photo point monitoring. Please indicate below: 1) the location of the monitoring activities

relative to the project, including photo point locations, 2) whether effectiveness monitoring is planned,

and 3) whether additional monitoring will be conducted for this project.

4.1) Identify the location for the planned monitoring activities relative to the restoration project location.

Check as many boxes as apply.

Onsite Downstream Upstream Upslope

4.2) Effectiveness monitoring will be conducted for this project. Please note that effectiveness monitoring cannot be funded with OWEB Small Grant Funds. To review effectiveness monitoring and post-implementation status reporting definitions click on the link to the OWEB Web site below. http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/MONITOR/effective_monitoring.shtml

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/MONITOR/effective_monitoring.shtml


4.3) Will this project conduct monitoring activities beyond the required post-implementation status

reporting and photo point monitoring?

Yes No If you answer yes, select the monitoring activities below, if you answer no proceed to

Section 2.

Check all proposed monitoring activities

Adult Fish presence/absence/abundance/distribution

survey(s)

Spawning surveys

Juvenile Fish

presence/absence/abundance/distribution survey(s)

Upland vegetation

(Presence/Absence)

Instream Habitat surveys Water quality

Macroinvertebrates Water quantity

Noxious weed (Presence/Absence) Photo Points

Riparian vegetation (Presence/Absence) Other (explain):

Section 2. Project Activities Provide values for each Project Activity applicable to your application. Leave blank any Project Activity or metric line that is not appropriate to your application. All data entered in this form should be what you plan to do with the project. Data about completed projects will be reported at the end of the project to the Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI). For each activity type where you enter metrics, estimate the percentage of the total cost of the project (OWEB and all other funding sources, shown in III. 9.of this application) that applies to the activity. The sum of all of the activity cost percentages should equal 100%. Please distribute all administrative, project management and other general project costs among the various project activities when estimating percentages.

Example: A project will remove a fish passage barrier, place large boulders instream, and plant a riparian buffer. You would enter the appropriate metrics into the Fish Passage, Instream Habitat, and Riparian Habitat activity sections of this form. Then, estimate the percentage of the total cost of the project for each activity. For instance: 20% towards Fish Passage activities, 25% towards Instream Habitat activities, and 55% towards Riparian Habitat activities.

Fish Screening Projects: Projects that result in the installation or improvement of screening systems that prevent fish from passing into areas that do not support fish survival, for example, into irrigation diversion channels.

Note: OWEB funds cannot be used for fish screening projects

% Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to fish screening activities

New Fish Screens Installed

# Estimate the number of new screens installed (do not count diversions where existing screens are

replaced)

cfs Estimate the cubic feet per second of flow influenced by new screen(s) installed (to nearest 0.01 cfs)

Existing Screens Replaced, repaired or modified

# Estimate the number of existing screens replaced, repaired or modified

cfs Estimate the cubic feet per second of flow influenced by existing screen(s) screens (to nearest 0.01 cfs)


Fish Passage Improvement: Projects that improve fish migration by addressing a migration barrier problem. Complete sections A-E as they apply to the proposed project. For projects that improve fish passage at road crossings complete both sections A (define the problem) and B (define the treatment). Non-road crossing improvements are reported in sections C and D. Section E should be completed for all fish passage improvement projects. Refer to the application instructions for additional information and examples.

A. Road Crossings – Define Existing Fish Passage Problem

1. Culverts hindering fish passage # crossings

2. Bridges hindering fish passage # crossings

3. Fords hindering fish passage # crossings

B. Road Crossings – Define the Fish Passage Improvements to be implemented by this project

1. Culverts installed/improved -Improvements include installing baffles inside culverts or installing/improving engineered bypasses (e.g. weirs) directly below a culvert outlet to improve passage.

# crossings str. mi with improved

access*

2. Bridges installed/improved -Improvements include installing/improving engineered bypasses (e.g. weirs) directly below a bridge crossing to improve passage.

# crossings str. mi with improved

access*

3. Fords installed/improved # crossings str. mi with improved

access*

4. Road Crossings removed and not replaced # crossings str. mi with improved

access*

*Estimate stream miles in the main channel and tributaries made more accessible above the crossing(s) (to nearest 0.01 mile). If a barrier exists upstream, report the length made accessible up to that next upstream barrier.

C. Fish Passage Barriers – Other than Road Crossings

1. Type(s) of barriers to be treated/removed to improve fish passage.

Diversion Dam

Push-up Dam

Wood or Concrete Dam

Weir (not associated with a road crossing)

Logs

Debris

Boulder/Rock Barrier (not weirs)

Landslide

Other (explain)

2. # Estimate the total number of non-road crossing barriers (listed above) to be removed or altered to improve

passage.

D. Fish Ladders or Engineered Bypasses (not associated with Road Crossings)

1. Fish ladders will be installed/improved # fish ladders to be installed/improved

2. Engineered bypasses will be installed/improved. This includes weirs, rock

boulder step pools, and chutes constructed/roughened in bed rock. Do not

count engineered bypasses located at a road crossing to improve passage

at the crossing. These types of improvements should be identified above in

section B as a Road Crossing Fish Passage Improvement.

# engineered bypasses to be installed/improved

E. Fish Passage Summary Metrics

1. % Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to fish passage improvements

2. mi Estimate the total stream miles that will be made more accessible in the main channel and

tributaries above the project (to nearest 0.01 mile). This metric summarizes the stream miles for all of

the proposed passage improvements (defined above in Sections A-D). If a barrier exists upstream

of the project, report the length made accessible up to that next upstream barrier.


3. # Estimate the total number of barriers (this includes road crossings, diversion dams, push up dams,

wood or concrete dams, weirs, etc.) to be removed or altered to improve passage.

Instream Flow: Projects that maintain and/or increase the instream flow of water. Irrigation improvements that are primarily designed to improve water quality should be reported under Upland – Agriculture Management. Check all proposed activities.

Irrigation practice improved to increase instream flows (e.g. install diversion headgate, replace open ditches with pipes)

Water flow gauges installed to measure water use

This project will dedicate instream flow. Other (explain):

% Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to instream flow activities

mi. Estimate the miles of stream where increased flow is the result of decreased/eliminated water

withdrawals

cfs Estimate the increase in flow of water in the stream as a result of conservation effort (cubic feet per

second)

mm/dd/yyyy Initial start date of irrigation practice improvement

mm/dd/yyyy Final end date of irrigation practice improvement (if improvement is permanent enter

12/31/9999)

mm/dd/yyyy Water lease/agreement initial start date of no withdrawal

mm/dd/yyyy Water lease/agreement final end date of no withdrawal (if lease/agreement is permanent, enter 12/31/9999)

Instream Habitat: Projects that are designed to improve instream habitat conditions. Check all proposed activities.

Channel reconfiguration and connectivity (e.g.,

creating instream pools, meanders, improving

floodplain connectivity, off-channel habitat,

removal or alteration of levee or berm, removal

of sediment)

Spawning gravel placement

Channel structure - large wood placement Plant Removal/control (instream)

List scientific names of plants

Channel structure - boulder placement Carcass or nutrient placement:

salmonid carcass; fish meal brick; other

nutrient

Channel structure placement (other than large

wood or boulder placements), e.g., engineered

structures or deflectors, barbs, weirs, etc.

Other (explain):

Streambank stabilization through resloping

and/or placing rocks, logs (e.g. revetments,

gabions, barbs), or bioengineering on

streambank

% Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to instream habitat activities

mi. Estimate the miles of stream to be treated with instream habitat treatments (to nearest 0.01 mile)

% Estimate the percentage of insteam activity costs for carcass or nutrient placements. If you do not

select carcass/nutrient placements as an instream activity, leave this value blank. Example: Your

project will place salmon carcasses. You estimated that 25% of the total project cost will apply to

instream habitat activities and one half of the instream improvements costs will apply to the carcass

placement, you would report 50%.


Riparian Habitat: Projects above the ordinary high-water mark of the stream and within the floodplain of the stream. Check all proposed activities.

Riparian planting Non-native/noxious plant control

Riparian exclusion fencing Vegetation management (e.g. prescribed

burnings, stand thinning, stand conversions,

silviculture)

Livestock exclusion by means other than fencing (includes placing obstacles to exclude livestock,

people, vehicles, etc., but not for individual plant

protection)

Debris/structure removal (OWEB funds cannot

be used for general trash removal)

Water gap development (fenced livestock

crossing or livestock bridge)

Other (explain): Do not report livestock

water developments here, report livestock water

developments under upland habitat treatments.

% Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to riparian habitat activities

ac. Estimate the acres of riparian habitat to be planted (to nearest 0.1 acres)

ac. Estimate the acres of riparian habitat to be treated for non-native/noxious weeds (to nearest 0.1 acres)

ac. Estimate the total riparian acres to be treated. (to nearest 0.1 acres)

mi. Estimate the miles of riparian streambank to be treated (to nearest 0.01 mi).

Stream sides treated one two (Do not double count miles if a second side is treated)

Upland Habitat: Projects implemented above the floodplain. Check all proposed activities.

Planting/seeding for erosion control (e.g.,

convert from crops to native vegetation, plant area

where non-native/noxious weeds removed, grassed

waterways, windbreaks, filter strips)

List scientific names of plants

Livestock Manure Management (e.g., feedlot

improvements to reduce runoff , relocate/improve

manure holding structures and manure piles to

reduce/eliminate drainage into streams)

Slope stabilization (e.g., grade stabilization,

landslide reparation, terracing slopes) Upland Livestock Management (other than

livestock water developments), e.g., grazing plans,

fencing

Non-native/noxious plant control;

List scientific names of plants:

Restore Historic Upland Habitats (e.g. oak

woodland, oak savannah, upland prairie restoration)

Juniper removal/control Livestock/Wildlife Water Developments

Vegetation Management (other than non-

native/noxious plant control or juniper removal, e.g.

tree thinning, brush control, burning)

List scientific names of plants:

Erosion control structures not already reported

under Upland Agriculture Management or Road

Drainage System and Surface Improvements.

Upland Agriculture Management (e.g., no/low-

till, wind breaks, filter strips, crop rotation, terracing,

water and sediment control basins, grade

stabilization and irrigation improvements)

Other (explain):

100 % Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project will apply to upland habitat activities

2 # Estimate the number of livestock/wildlife water developments

ac. Estimate the acres of upland habitat to be treated for non-native/noxious plants (to nearest 0.1 acres)

ac. Estimate the total acres of upland habitat to be treated (do not include acres of upland habitat

affected by livestock water developments (to nearest 0.1 acres)

% Estimate the percentage of upland activity costs applied to Livestock Manure Management. If you do

not select Livestock Manure Management as an upland activity, leave this value blank.

Example: Project will relocate a feedlot to reduce livestock manure runoff. You estimated that 33% of

the total project cost will apply to upland habitat activities and one half of the upland improvements

costs will apply to the feedlot relocation, you would report 50%.


Road Activities: Projects designed to improve road impacts to watersheds. Check all proposed activities.

Road drainage system and surface improvements &

reconstruction

Other (explain):

Road closure, relocation, obliteration

(decommissioning)

% Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to road activities

mi. Estimate the miles of road treated (to nearest 0.01 mile)

Urban Impact Reduction: Check all of the urban impact related activities that will be used by this

project.

Toxin reduction: list names of each toxic species,

element or material:

Bioswales

Pesticide reduction: list names of each pesticide:

Detention Facility

Stormwater/wastewater modification or treatment

(includes rain gardens)

Other urban impact reduction (explain):

Check all of the water quality limiting factors addressed by the Urban Impact Reduction activities selected

above. Do not select limiting factors addressed by other types of restoration activities.

Bacteria Pesticides Nutrients

Dissolved Oxygen Toxics Sediment

Heavy Metals High Temperature Other (explain):

% Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to urban impact activities

Wetland Habitat: Projects designed to create or improve wetland areas. Check all proposed activities.

Wetland planting Artificial wetland area created from an area not

formerly a wetland

Non-native/noxious/invasive plant control Other (explain):

Wetland improvement/restoration of existing or

historic wetland (other than vegetation planting

or removal)

% Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to wetland habitat activities

ac. Estimate the acres of wetland habitat to be treated for non-native/noxious/invasive plants (to nearest

0.1 acres)

ac. Estimate the acres of artificial wetland created (to nearest 0.1 acres)

ac. Estimate the total acres of wetland habitat (existing or historic) treated (to nearest 0.1 acres)


Estuarine Habitat: Projects that result in improvement or increase in the availability of estuarine habitat.

Check all proposed activities.

Estuarine planting Non-native/noxious plant control

Channel modification/creation (e.g., improve

intertidal flow to existing estuarine habitat) Creation of new estuarine habitat where one

did not exist previously by methods other than

tidegates or dikes

Dike or berm modification/removal Estuarine culvert modification/removal

Removal of existing fill material Exclusion devices

Placement of fill material (for proper terrestrial

function)

Other (explain):

% Estimate the percentage of total cost of the project applied to estuarine habitat activities

ac. Estimate the acres of estuarine habitat to be treated for non-native/noxious plants (to nearest 0.1 acres)

ac. Estimate the total acres of estuarine habitat (existing or historic) to be treated (to nearest 0.1 acres)


Section 3. Salmon/Steelhead Populations Targeted and Expected Benefits to Salmon/Steelhead The information provided will be used by OWEB better to meet federal and state reporting

requirements. Completion of this section is required but will not be used to evaluate this application

for funding.

This project is NOT specifically designed to benefit salmon or steelhead.

► If you check this box, STOP here.

Targeted Salmon/Steelhead Populations: Select one or more of the salmon ESUs (Evolutionary

Significant Unit) or steelhead DPSs (Distinct Population Segment) that the project will

address/benefit. For species where the ESU/DPS name is not known or determined, use the species

name with unidentified ESU (e.g., Chinook salmon – unidentified ESU). Additional information on the

designation and location of the salmon/steelhead populations can be found at:

http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/maps_data/species_population_boundaries.html

Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Coho Salmon (O. kisutch) Deschutes River summer/fall-run ESU Lower Columbia River ESU

Lower Columbia River ESU Oregon Coast ESU

Mid-Columbia River spring-run ESU Southern Oregon/Northern

California ESU

Oregon Coast ESU unidentified ESU

Snake River Fall-run ESU Steelhead (O. mykiss) Snake River Spring/Summer-run ESU Klamath Mountains Province DPS

Southern Oregon and Northern California

Coastal ESU

Lower Columbia River DPS

Upper Klamath-Trinity Rivers ESU Middle Columbia River DPS

Upper Willamette River ESU Oregon Coast DPS

unidentified ESU Snake River Basin DPS

Chum Salmon (O. keta) Washington Coast DPS (SW

Washington) Columbia River ESU Upper Willamette River DPS Pacific Coast ESU Steelhead/Trout unidentified DPS

unidentified ESU

Expected Benefits: Write a brief description of the goals and purpose of the project and how it is

expected to benefit salmon/steelhead or salmon/steelhead habitat. See Application Instructions

for helpful examples.

By fencing off two active spring sources, cattle will not be able to loaf in the spring and

contaminate the water as it makes its way downslope into Sevenmile creek, which will make it to

Mckay, home of Redband Trout, genetically identitical to Steelhead.

http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/maps_data/species_population_boundaries.html

Expense CategoryNo. of

Units

Unit

Cost

OWEB

Funds

Match

Funds

District Manager 20 35.00 700

700 0

Doherty Fence, LLC 1 $16,025.00 11,497 4,528

11,497 4,528

0 0

0 0

Site Visits 80 0.535 27

27 0

Land Use 1 25.00 25

25 0

12,249 4,528

Indirect Costs 1,258

75

13,582 4,528

SUBTOTAL (4)

INDIRECT COSTS:Not to exceed 10% of Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC). Compute by multiplying MTDC by 0.10 or less. See

the current Budget Categories Definitions document for eligible costs. http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/Pages/forms_linked.aspx#

Year-Two Status Report

TRAVEL. Mileage. For currnet rates go to: http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/Pages/forms_linked.aspx#

OTHER. Land use signature costs, project permit costs, small equipment repair, commercial equipment rental.

Post-Project Plant Establishment (Not to exceed $1,000 in OWEB funds)

(Not to exceed $200)

not to exceed 10% of MTDC, however, grants of $2,000

or less may request up to $200

Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC) (Add

Subtotals 1-6)

10. Project Budget- Itemize projected costs for each of the following "Expense Categories" that apply to your project. A

minimum of 25% match is required. See application instructions and additional team conditions for further guidance.

Totals automatically round to the nearest dollar. Please do not include cents.

SUBTOTAL (1)

Description--what will be purchased or done

and who will provide the item/perform the

work

SALARIES, WAGES AND BENEFITS. Refers to in-house staff/applicant employees for whom payroll taxes are paid. List position titles;

include only costs of employees charged to this grant.Kyle Waggoner

CONTRACTED SERVICES. Labor, supplies, materials, and travel to be provided by non-staff for project implementation.

MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES. Refers to items that are purchased by or invoiced to the applicant, and are "used up" in the course of

the project. Costs to OWEB must be directly related to the implementation of this grant.

POST GRANT

EQUIPMENT. Refers to items over $1,000 with a usual lifespan of over 2 years. Purchase of equipment is discouraged in Small

PROJECT TOTALS

SUBTOTAL (2)

SUBTOTAL (3)

SUBTOTAL (5)

Includes Materials, Supplies, and Labor (see quote)

(Not to exceed $15,000 in OWEB funds)

SUBTOTAL (6)

2017-19 budget Page 1

Estimate

Date10/12/15

Estimate No.2345

Name/AddressBroken Spur30522 Oldfield StreetHermiston, OR 97838

Project

DOHERTY FENCE L.L.C.PO Box 492Pilot Rock, Oregon97868-0492

Item Description Quantity Cost TotalLabor Cunningham Spring Development. Materials and

Labor. One spring on hillside, one in bottom of ditch.2 2,855.00 5,710.00T

Supplys 1 1/2 Schedule 40 galvanized pipe to trough.Includes trenching and backfill. Cannot trench todepth.

1,950 3.30 6,435.00T

Supplys 600 Gallon water trough 2 950.00 1,900.00TLabor Trough pad. Includes Materials and labor to install

pad. Includes pipe trough protecter2 990.00 1,980.00T

Sales Tax Computed in Quicken 0.00% 0.00

Total $16,025.00

17070103

17060104

Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, andthe GIS user community

Sevenmile Spring Developments

District: UMATILLA SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTApproximate Acres: 30Legal Description:

State and County: OR, Umatilla County, OregonAssisted By: Kyle Waggoner

6,700 0 6,700 13,400 20,100 26,800Feet ¯

LegendQuad MapHUC 8

Project Location

X

X

170701032S33E5

Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, andthe GIS user community




125 0 125 250 375 500Feet ¯

LegendQuad MapHUC 8Township, Range, Sec

Exclusion Fence

Spring Source

Pipline

Trough #1

Trough #2

X

X

170701032S33E5

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO,USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, OrdnanceSurvey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo,MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS user community




125 0 125 250 375 500Feet ¯

LegendQuad MapHUC 8Township, Range, Sec

Exclusion Fence

Spring Source

Pipline

Trough #1

Trough #2


Photos

Spring Source #1: Note the strong flow.

Spring Source 1: Springbox will be placed here and then piped to trough #1.

Spring Source #1: Site where Spring #1’s trough will be placed.

Spring Source #2 and troughs: Dilapidated troughs at spring site #2. New troughs will replace these

derelicts. Spring source #2 is right next to troughs.

Small Grant Program Application Processing Information ...loafing. Around 1000ft of pipe will be...

Documents

Transcript of Small Grant Program Application Processing Information ...loafing. Around 1000ft of pipe will be...