SM for Printing

download SM for Printing

of 16

Transcript of SM for Printing

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    1/16

    April 8, 2013

    Sunderland Facult of Business & Law Under raduate Pro ramm

    STRATEGIC MANAGEMEN

    SIM 336

    INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT REPORT

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    2/16

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    This report emphasizes Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation, which is one of the largest

    organization in the fast-food industry, a number of issues facing with in 2013. From being the

    dominant firm in this industry, KFC must find the solution to turn back while it is kept among

    other big existing competitors as well as potential rivalry. Besides, this report also demonstrates

    and evaluates opportunities and threats faced with in 2013 summarized from succeeds and

    failures as well as the internal and external factors from environments which put effects onto

    KFC. Another purpose of this paper evaluates and gives a comprehensive list of pressure for

    global integration and local responsiveness in global fast-food industry. Understanding and

    applying Schools of Thought into defining strategies for KFC are important, therefore, the report

    analyze, evaluate their meaning and the way of implication into real reactions to help KFC

    Corporation seek its objectives. Last but not least, the paper explain how international strategic

    managers of KFC can apply Hofstedes (1993) theory of cultural dimensions to build productive

    relationship with international markets.

    KFC Corporation having brand value change of 8% with nearly $8,9 million in total is just

    ranked at 4th, while Starbuck is strongly speeding up in the perspective with a positive 47%

    changing and McDonalds is always the dominant. KFC faces with threats from other big

    competitor like McDonalds, Starbuck, and Subway as well as from the health-oriented behavior

    of customers. It also could be from the new entrants in a long-term period of time like the way

    Subway speeding up and beat KFC in the industry. The gross income of KFC has trend of

    decreasing at the end of 2012 compared with 2011, which is the lowest in recent 5 years. The

    paper reveals that Systemic School of Thought is the fittest for KFC Corporation with its main

    characteristics and should refuse Evolutionary approach. The different cultural dimensions such

    as Power Distance, Masculinity, Long-term orientation, Individualism, Uncertainty Avoidance

    should be carefully considered in implication in different countries with such different cultures.

    2 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    3/16

    INTRODUCTION

    Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation founded by Harland Sanders is one of the biggest fast-food

    restaurant chain all over the world. It was also known as the first mover in franchising, until now,

    KFC has had 800 restaurants across the UK and 17,000 outlets in 115 countries and territories at

    the end of 2011 operating under franchising and company-based. KFCs menu specializes in

    fried chicken with a long range of choices for customers. After a long period of time, Heublein,

    Inc. acquired KFC and then Pepsi Co, Inc. took over KFC in 1986 to diversify its business into

    restaurant industry, and now, KFC is one of brand of Yum!Brands which was formerly named

    Tricon Global Restaurants (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KFC). From belonging to PepsiCo, Inc.,

    the management as well as cultures of KFC had been strongly changed with the rotation of five

    divisions for its best manager to create put big pressure for them. Even until now, KFC cannot

    keep its position of being on the top in fast-food industry, it still has the first place in the chicken

    segment in the world According to Quick Service Restaurant magazine (www.qsrmagazine.com).

    3 | P a g e

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KFChttp://www.qsrmagazine.com/http://www.qsrmagazine.com/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KFC
  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    4/16

    CONTENTS

    1. Question 1

    1.1. SWOT and Porters value Chain techniques and explain their practical

    relevant to strategic planners at Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) Corporation

    In the process of setting up a strategy for company, it is important to identify the effects of

    external and internal environments onto the way in which company runs its business. Therefore,

    there are a number of tools that firms use to develop strategies which are SWOT and Porters

    Value Chain models.

    SWOT analysis (Figure 1, see Appendices) is an analytical tool for business to identify and

    assess Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities Threats which are the internal and external

    factors put effects on the company, then find the best strategies for a long term plan. In strategic

    planning, SWOT model helps strategic planners identify internal strengths and weaknesses

    which discover the current situation inside of company, external opportunities and threats which

    discover effects can put impact on from outside of company, and then companies try to match

    Strengths with Opportunities to find companys competitive advantages and convert Weaknesses

    and Threats into Opportunities, then match Opportunities with identified Strengths.

    In the case of Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) Corporation, KFC has been considered as a well-

    known, recognized brand name which is one of the best strengths of KFC. Besides, the

    opportunity of KFC at that period of time was the population of Mexico which was 93 million in

    1994 and had a trend of increasing afterwards. In other words, this is a large market for KFC to

    take the leadership position and McDonalds could not seize the position of KFC, hence must go

    international in Brazil. Because of, however, the close substitutes in the market, slowing in

    introducing new products while McDonalds test-marketed its new product-McChicken

    sandwich in the Louisville market, and finally, KFCs sandwich was eliminated which wascaused by the strong consumer awareness of McDonalds sandwich. Another weakness of KFC is

    unstable quality services in a number of stores, this point was driven by the conflict between

    KFC and Pepsi Co. in the days of Colonel Sander, he built the cultures and relationship among

    employees, but Pepsi Co tried to drive strong performance rather than what Mr. Sander did.

    Consequently, the culture was inconsistent and got stuck in the middle of two cultural dimension

    4 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    5/16

    (Pepsi Co and KFC). KFC had to face with was the trend of consumer health food which means

    consumer cared more about their health, decreased the frequency of eating fried items.

    Therefore, KFC had to convert its weaknesses, threats into strengths and opportunities, and

    minimized them by finding new markets such as Mexico, the Caribbean; introducing new

    products with bonus packs to balance consumers taste.

    Value Chain technique initially published by Michael Porter assesses how effectiveness of a

    company is in a chain of activities and then deliver its products, services to the market. The

    Value Chain model described by Porter (Figure 2, see Appendices) divided chain of activities

    into two parts which are primary activities and support activities. It means that how firm

    infrastructure, human resource management, technology development and procurement

    support primary activities, from inbound logistics to after sales service. In the strategic

    planning, Value Chain plays an important roles in identifying and evaluating internal activities

    while SWOT covers both internal and external factors. In other words, SWOT and Value Chain

    techniques can combine and fit together to present a better overview of company in determining

    the best strategies based on the analytical characteristics from them. Besides, managing supply

    chain is a necessary step in strategic management because it determines both whether inputs and

    outputs work out effectively. By means of using changing inputs flexibly or optimizing the

    transportation of raw materials, goods, services, and company can minimize costs as well as

    effectively increase the competition among existing rivalry. In this case, raw materials are

    controlled with the supporting from IT database, and based on the local location, KFC saved

    travelling cost because the suppliers were located locally. KFC also tended to approach

    economics of scales, IT equipment are used in freezing chicken to ensure its quality, staff and

    employees were trained to serve customers well which supports for marketing and sales as well

    as services. KFC is having a good customer service thanks to free delivery and in time.

    Generally, infrastructure, HR management and IT development are well supporting KFC

    business activities creating the competitive advantages such as customer satisfaction, cleanness,qualified employees and staff, modern technology.

    5 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    6/16

    1.2. Evaluation of the opportunities and threats that faced KFC Corporation in

    2013

    The Porters Five Forces framework(1993) created by Michael Porter are used to analyze and

    understand deeply where powers of a company are, and then gain the strengths and weaknesses aspecific situation in order to prevent from carrying out wrong activities. Michael Porter (1993)

    described five factors affecting company; namely, the bargaining power of suppliers, the

    bargaining power of customers, the rivalry among existing firms, the threat of substitutes and the

    threat of new entrants (Figure 3, see appendices).

    a. The bargaining power of supply

    There are many suppliers of KFC in terms of chicken, beef, drinks, bread and bun such as Pepsi

    Co, Henny Penny, and CPF & Westbridge Foods, and KFC has qualified standards to choose

    suppliers for each material. However, it is also a reason why suppliers like Henny Penny or

    CPF& Westbridge Foods can increase the prices. Building relationship with a supplier is not a

    short-term issue, hence if KFC tends to change other suppliers, as a results it will cost KFC in

    starting building the relationship. The switching cost would be high and more difficult in this

    crisis period. For example, drink of KFC is product of Pepsi Co which is a big company and

    even if KFC stops its business with Pepsi, it also does not create any effect Pepsi while Coke is

    serving McDonalds big competitor of KFC.

    b. The bargaining power of customers

    Customer directly impacted the whole business activities is a competitive pressure. As a coin has

    two sides, so does in fast food industry, there are numbers of reasons why the bargaining power

    of customer is wide and heavy pressure.

    Customer base in fast food industry is large which is a greatly profitable change for KFC to gain

    market; however, customers are tend to purchasing products and services which are good for

    their health. Customer awareness in terms of value, satisfaction, price and service has been the

    highest than ever. While McDonalds has been evaluated as the best service and value according

    to a recent survey on the QSR magazine (www.qsrmagazine.com ) responding to the customers

    needs. According to Reuters, one of setbacks of KFC is high level of antibotics detected in

    Mexico chicken leads to the choices of customers. Besides, the product prices of other brands

    6 | P a g e

    http://www.qsrmagazine.com/http://www.qsrmagazine.com/
  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    7/16

    such as McDonalds or Subway is similar to that of KFC, therefore, the switching costs of

    suppliers will not affect significantly to customers. Overall, the bargaining power of customers

    will be based on the price sensitivity, expectation in relation with health, taste, and switching

    costs.

    c. The threats from substitute products

    KFC has been faced with the issue that the switching cost in fast food industry is low, so instead

    of purchasing a fried chicken, customer can buy a Big Mac of McDonalds. Customer is healthy-

    oriented meals, and KFC having a diversified range of products with a suitable prices, high

    nutrition contents which lead to various choices for customers. Moreover, customer loyalty is

    one of the most important factors that KFC carefully concerned to attract awareness of new

    customers as well as existing ones, quality-price combination in the long range of products isalso qualified standard in the buying behaviors of customers.

    d. New entrants

    In fast food industry, big players are as a barrier to prevent new entrants entering. Financial

    budgets for penetration such as Research & Development, marketing costs, human resources are

    high to differentiate from other players. This point leads to the difficulty that new entrants have

    to face with. The acquisition has been considered as a solution after a period of time if new

    comers still attempt at entering and could be a potential threat for KFC. KFC builds distribution

    channels itself to deliver products to consumers, but distribution channels cost will be low if new

    comers afford financial budgets to find distributors themselves.

    e. The rivalry among current competitors

    Competitive competitors of KFC in fast food industry such as McDonalds, Subway, Wendy

    those put impact on the businesses and share market as well as a number of segments. In the

    industry, KFC placed 9th while many big fast food companies had created a long distance in

    terms of sales according to a report on QSR Magazine in 2010. McDonalds ranked at 1st with

    more than $32 billion in total sales (Figure 4, see Appendices). The next positions belong to

    Subway and Wendys. The product differentiation is not high and switching cost is low, so it is

    not a big problem if customers refuse KFC and buy a product of McDonalds or Wendys. The

    competition is high for fast food companies and the changing of buying behaviors of customers

    7 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    8/16

    also remain high to forget a company and purchase others. It is clearly to see that KFC is a

    setback based on the effectiveness of business in the whole industry, even in chicken segment,

    KFC still remains 1st but feels the pressure from the closest competitors- Chick-fil-A which is

    also a fast-food company in the same segment.

    f. The pressure for global integration activities and the pressure for local

    responsiveness

    In the context of current development in the global industry with pressures for global integration

    activities, company has considered a perspective which is the cooperation and the way how to

    control its business activities internationally. Such pressures are reflected as multinational

    customers, competitors, investment and technology intensity, cost reduction, universal consumer

    needs, and assessing raw materials. While pressure for local responsiveness could be differencesin needs of customers, distribution channels, the substitutes, structure of market and host

    government demands (Tony .P and Philip .K, 2001, p.105). Two types of pressure are taken into

    account for planning strategy.

    In the case study, KFC is one of the biggest company in the fast food industry and after running

    business domestically, KFC expanded business internationally with global integration of

    activities as well as considering the local responsiveness in which countries KFC ran its business

    through franchising and restaurant-based. In the given information, franchising system accountsfor 69%, while 31% includes both company-owned and licensed restaurants or by joint ventures.

    In the pressures for global integration of activities, in the current countries which KFC operates,

    the process of recruitment, training, quality standards are in attempt to make them similarly with

    outlets in US. It also had a standardization in recipe to keep the original chicken taste to

    demonstrate that the Original Recipe Meal customers eat in Mexico is the same taste with that in

    US and everywhere in the globe. The global serving is also standardized including the uniform,

    customer care and information technology media.

    Pressures for local responsiveness in the case could be local cultures, legislation, custom, and

    language through KFCs operation. For instance, employees working in outlets of KFC Mexico

    are natives speaking Spanish and English. Menu list of KFC Mexico outlets also includes rice,

    beef which are current Mexican foods. Such pressures are also presented through regulation and

    local requirements as well as the differences in purchase behaviors.

    8 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    9/16

    2. Question 2

    a. Understanding of Evolutionary and Systemic Schools of Thought

    Whittington (2000) presented other approach to strategy formulation with the key differentiating

    dimensions. He divided his consideration into two parts with a grid four approach to strategy

    with vertical axis which was profit-maximizing outcomes or pluralistic outcomes, and horizontal

    axis which describe the process of planning strategy deliberately or whether it emerge by

    accident, muddle, inertia.

    Evolutionary perspective depicts the business environment, which put effects onto company is

    unpredictable, hence company has to struggle to survive. Strategists consider this approach under

    four concepts which are population ecology, entrepreneurship, wider environmental forces, and

    symbiosis and co-operation (Strategic management text book, unit 4).

    Forpopulation ecology, strategists need to identify clearly successful recipe, in other words,

    they are critical success factors which ensure organization is driven to succeed. The company

    following this school tries to create themselves competitive advantages, unique cultures to be the

    strongest organization compared with the populations of similar ones which pursuit same

    purposes (resources, customer awareness).

    By combining a number of factors and accepting the risks in order to create a new organization,

    although firm-organizing entrepreneurs theoretically own new company, the products or

    services are not new ideas. Therefore, organization needs to add differentiated values to products,

    services which is evaluated as better than original one to attract consumers. The innovative

    entrepreneurs as evolutional strategists are the innovators bringing something together to create

    a new products, services and serve the whole society. It is undeniable how powerful they are,

    however, this power can be destroyed if other organization can issue new and better version of

    products, services.

    Evolutionary strategists should concern wider environmental factors changing which put

    impacts on business. The way organization responses to the impacts of macro environmental

    factors will be the differentiation from other competitors in the sectors.

    9 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    10/16

    Organizations coming from different sectors in the business world can work together to create

    symbiosis relationship for reciprocal benefits. While co-operation relationship depicts the

    interaction among similar organizations. The cooperation between organizations makes more

    powerful in competing with individual organization.

    Strategists following systemic approach consider organization as a purposeful system with its

    complexity and drive business to prosperity. Organization approaching this school is affected by

    a number of factors from environments. It is necessary to consider and evaluate economic and

    social factors to ensure the productive relationships. The advocates of systemic school are

    reflected through characteristics such as pluralist, dynamic process, changing characteristics,

    purposeful system, viability, multiple communication channels, and environment of equal

    importance. In comparison with Evolutionary school, Systemic school stands out more flexible

    in organization when being affected from factors of environments. The sub-systems (HR,

    marketing, finance, etc.) interact and influence the others. (Strategic Management course book,

    unit 7)

    b. Critically evaluate how you might apply these two Schools of thought to KFC in

    2013. Explain and explore which school of thought you prefer, and why?

    I assume KFC would apply Systemic School of Thought in business, KFC should pay more

    attention on the social and economic factors as given above. Because of the differences of socialand economic systems among countries KFC operates, KFC must be acceptable rather than try to

    avoid unwanted markets, and just choose the best ones, and create the productive relationship to

    economy as well as community. In order to have productive relationships, business ethics should

    also be concerned which means that think globally, act locally is in relation to the ecologic and

    economic contexts. For ecologic context, KFC would train staff and employees the thought of

    behaviors for protecting environment and acting smartly and tolerantly in foreign countries, it

    would outsource the package of products from biodegradable materials if take-away. Such things

    would make a new point in KFC cultures. For economic context, KFC, through its business

    activities, would support local companies and create chances for agriculture by purchasing raw

    materials such as chickens, beef, vegetables from local provider, especially, in Asian and Middle

    East countries where agriculture is one of the main economies, rice and vegetables could be

    ordered with low prices and good quality, those activities could support well community.

    10 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    11/16

    On the other hand, if I were to apply Evolutionary School of Thought in KFC Corporation, it

    would be better to build a short-term plan rather than long-term one, try to adapt and fit

    environment before planning deliberately in current market such as politics, economic, social and

    technological factor (PEST) in order to survive. Moreover, KFC will refuse entering the markets

    in which it does not feel safe.

    From my point of view, I highly recommend the Systemic School of Thought in practical.

    Evolutionary would be better if applying in small and medium business to compete other

    competitors with dynamic and new creative idea for products, services in emerging industry,

    while KFC is a big player in fast food industry. Another reason is although evolutionary

    perspective could help KFC use cost efficiently, strategy will be limited and must be the fittest

    within a market because of being sure of the best adaption in population. And the other is

    systemic perspective can create KFC chance to exchange benefits with society and

    communication through business ethics. In other words, KFC could benefit ecology and

    economy in current countries it is operating (productive relationships).

    3. Question 3.

    Using your understanding of Whittingtons (2000) Systemic School of Thought, critically

    evaluate the implications of those cultural dimensions for internal strategic manager at

    KFC in building productive relationships with the outside world.

    KFC Corporation following Systemic School of Thought need to well define strategy which is

    suitable with economy in different markets as well as considering carefully social environments

    in order to create productive relationship with the outside world. Hofstede (1997) stood out 5

    cultural dimensions in which they are different in various markets.

    From Power Distance cultural dimension, in order to pursuit pluralistic outcomes of Systemic

    School of Thought, KFC would consider whether current country KFC operates is high or low

    power distance. For example, the power Distance Index of Mexico (81) is high, so KFC would

    built tall hierarchy of organizational structural and leader has the strongest power in assigning

    the tasks for sub-systems which are low interaction between them.

    (http://www.clearlycultural.com/geert-hofstede-cultural-dimensions/power-distance-index/)

    11 | P a g e

    http://www.clearlycultural.com/geert-hofstede-cultural-dimensions/power-distance-index/http://www.clearlycultural.com/geert-hofstede-cultural-dimensions/power-distance-index/
  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    12/16

    Besides, KFC should also consider individualism cultural dimension and its opposite side is

    collectivism. For individualism, people gathered into groups, highly recommend the private

    respect, and expect the rewards for what they are well done. While with the advocates of

    collectivism, people express their something skillful, appreciate intrinsic rewards rather than

    extrinsic ones. Mexico has a strong collectivism with a quite low index (30) which illustrates a

    strong respect for age and wisdom, and show a slow changes and always maintain the traditions

    in society. KFC would define culture for staff and employees and train them for their suppressing

    behaviors and respects.

    Another implication is Femininity Index in KFCs international strategic management. Mexico

    has a masculinity with a high score (69) which means that sex role between male and female is

    distinct. KFC also may interfere peoples private life and create rewards based on the

    competition, aggression. In such market, KFC builds its organization based on the prior to

    masculine culture which is more assertive than femininity because the mens value is assessed

    more assertive and competitive than womens value.

    The Systemic School of Thought would require KFC evaluate the uncertainty avoidance

    dimension of markets. The uncertainty avoidance of Mexico is relatively high with a score of 82.

    KFC would concern and define a long-term strategy and accept the changes and risks from outer

    as well as build organization with informal attitude, staff and employees would control and

    express responses calmly and smartly in every situation.

    The last cultural dimension is long-term orientation. KFC tend to applying Systemic School of

    Thought with sociologically efficient. For example, KFC interacts with such cultural dimension

    in international strategic management in Mexico. Indeed, the traditions and culture in this

    country are strongly respected and the basis of society is family, sex role and ages are distinctive

    because male and older people are highly appreciated than the others.

    In general, KFC corporation must evaluate different cultural dimension for various markets inmany countries in order to suitable strategies for pursuing the productive relationship and

    sociologically efficient.

    12 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    13/16

    CONCLUSION

    The findings indicates that KFC uses analytical tools to identify opportunities and threats faced

    with in 2013 and define which strategy is suitable with capability of company. Besides, the paper

    critically evaluates two Schools of Thought based on the theory of Whittington in order to reveal

    the best perspective which is, from my point of view, System School of Thought.

    Word count: 3530

    13 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    14/16

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    15/16

    APPENDICES

    Figure 1. SWOT analysis model

    Figure 2. Value Chain technique

    15 | P a g e

  • 7/27/2019 SM for Printing

    16/16

    Figure 3. Porters Five Forces

    Figure 4. The top quick-serve and fast-casual brands in the nation

    16 | P a g e