Modeling Bone Morphogenetic Protein Diffusion of Infuse Bone Graft
Protein · Slower loss of muscle mass and strength ↑Bone mass density Slower rate bone loss...
Transcript of Protein · Slower loss of muscle mass and strength ↑Bone mass density Slower rate bone loss...
Understand of the important role protein has in
promoting functional independence in older adults.
Learn to differentiate the unintended weight loss
between sarcopenia, frailty, and geriatric failure to
thrive
Get ideas for promoting adequate energy and protein in
the diet of older adults.
Objectives
ANFP Annual Conference & Expo | Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress | Orlando, FL | August 2-5, 2015 2
Carbohydrates FUEL
Adequate energy is needed to fund basal metabolic rate
(BMR) + Activity
Key purpose: spare protein
Proteins BUILD
Amino acids are the body’s building blocks
Rebuild, strengthen, thicken muscle fibers
Key Point of Differentiation
3ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Metabolic Rate
Energy needed at rest
Range 1,000 – 2,500 kcal/day; average ~1,500
Variation due to: lean vs. fat mass, age and ???
BMR vs. RMR
Calculating BMR / RMR
Indirect calorimetry is gold standard
Scales – some calculate metabolic rate
Equations:
Harris-Benedict
Mifflin St Jeor
Energy
4ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Study Findings for 46 adults >70y in LTC (data gathered
9/2013 – 3/2014)
Weights stable >6 mo.
Ages ranged 86.6 + 6.9 y
BMI 26.7 + 3.9
Measured RMR vs. Estimated
ALL equations over estimated energy
Six Equations:
Closest -> Mifflin St. Jeor (37 + 372 kcals/day)
Worst -> FAO/WHO/UNU and Owen
Range of over-estimation -> 10.1% - 189%
Range of underestimation -> 10.6% - 29.8%
Calculating Energy
5ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Hicks J et al. Clinical Nutrition Week 2015 Int’l Abstract of Distinction J of Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015;39:252.
Mifflin St. Jeor Formula:
10*wt(kg) + 6.25*Ht(cm) - 5*Age(yrs) -161 = resting energy
expenditure (female)
10*wt(kg) + 6.25*Ht(cm) - 5*Age(yrs) + 5 = resting energy
expenditure (male)
Activity
1.3=sedentary
1.4=walking/standing, no exercise
1.5=exercise
1.6=walking & exercise
1.8=heavy lifting & exercise
Mifflin St. Jeor + Activity = daily calorie target
Calculating Energy
6ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Dietary protein + stored protein = amino acid pool
Body synthesizes ~250 grams new proteins daily
Replace old protein, repair tissue
Efficiency in protein utilization stops with growth
Protein
7ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Fig. 1
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2013 14, 542-559DOI: (10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021)
Copyright © 2013 American Medical Directors Association, Inc.
Needs Don’t Change with Age
Protein metabolism is less efficient in older adults
Protein and Aging
Preserve and/or replace lean body mass
Maintain healthy immune system
Assist with normal cell repair
Promote wound healing
Promote functional independence
Protein is fundamental to every
system and function in the body!
0.8 g/kg not enough for >65 y
Current requirements based on N-
balance and not optimizing muscle
mass or functionality
[Healthy] elderly require 1.0-1.2 g/kg
BW high quality protein daily to
maintain / gain muscle
Requirement may be 1.2-2.0 g/kg BW for
repletion
Adequate [quality] protein intake per
meal is important
25 – 30 gram / meal target
Bauer J, et al. JAMDA 2013;14:542-559.
*Praddon-Jones D, et al. JCEM 2004;89:4351-4358
Praddon-Jones D, et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87(suppl):1562S-1566S.
Loss of lean leg mass
during bed rest*
Benefits of Higher Protein Intake
Correlates to:
Slower loss of muscle mass and
strength
↑Bone mass density
Slower rate bone loss
Health ABC Study: subjects in highest
quintile of protein intake lost ~40% less
LBM than those in lowest quintile
70-100g animal protein vs. 30-60g
animal/ vegetable protein
Bauer J, et al. JAMDA 2013;14:542-559.
Houston DK, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:150-155.
All Proteins are Not “Equal”
Two considerations:
Quality [essential amino acid
content; esp. leucine]
Digestibility and bioavailability
Good, Better, Best…but any
protein better than none
Plant proteins (soy)
Egg
Dairy (whey, casein) & (lean)
Meat
Higher in key amino acid leucine
Praddon-Jones D, et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87(suppl):1562S-1566S
Symon TB, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:451-456.
ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 201513
Essential (indispensable) amino acid
Key metabolic trigger of process that initiates muscle
protein synthesis
The better the leucine intake the lower the overall
protein intake needs to be
Why Leucine?
14ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Needed
for 2.5 g
leucine
12.8 –
[2 oz. ]
slices
whole
grain
bread
5 oz.
chicken
breast
~4 – 8 oz.
glasses
of milk
5 oz.
beef
roast
5.3 oz.
peanuts
4.6 eggs
Optimal Feeding of Protein
25 – 30 gm / meal (w/ 2.5-
2.8 gm leucine per meal)
OR, at minimum
Main high-protein meal at
midday
Litchford, MD. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29:428-434.
Fig. 2
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2013 14, 542-559DOI: (10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021)
Copyright © 2013 American Medical Directors Association, Inc.
As able…30-60 min. / day of endurance exercise
Resistance training 2-3 x/wk for 10-15 min.
Frail individuals
can gain muscle
strength and
function!
ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 201517
>70% of older Americans would benefit
from improved eating habits. White JV et al. Nutr Clin Pract. 2003;18:3-11.
27362482
19071831 17591535
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
20-39 y 40-59 y >70 y
Males
Females
Energy (kcal/day) Intake of Adults
Usual Intake from Food
Source: What We Eat in America National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2010
327
279
232232 219196
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
20-39 y 40-59 y >70 y
Males
Females
Carbohydrate (g/day) Intake of Adults
Usual Intake from Food
Source: What We Eat in America National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2010
98 97
7268 6658
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
20-39 y 40-59 y >70 y
Males
Females
Fat (g/day) Intake of Adults
Usual Intake from Food
Source: What We Eat in America National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2010
106100
7470 7060
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
20-39 y 40-59 y >70 y
Males
Females
Protein (g/day) Intake of Adults
Usual Intake from Food
Source: What We Eat in America National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2010
Prevalence of Protein - Energy Malnutrition
in the Geriatric Population
6-15% in LTC Faz ia M e t .a l . JAMDA 2013; 14 :77-79
5-10% Community Dwellers
60% Hospitalized
35-85% in LTC Furman EF. J Geron to l Nu rs 2006;32:22-27
6% Community Dwellers
39% Hospitalized
51% Rehab
14% in LTC Ka iser MJ e t a l . J Am Ger ia t r Soc . 2010 ;58:1734 -1738 .
60% >65y in ER malnourished or at -risk Pere i ra GF e t a l . Ann Emerg Med . 2014 ;x :1 -7 . ( i n p ress)
MNA® better indicator of malnutrit ion than BMI in >85yrs.
Vitamins & Minerals
Over 40% of adults don’t meet the daily recommended
intakes for vitamins & minerals through diet alone
Calcium, Potassium, Magnesium,
Vitamins A, C, & E
For older adults also: Vitamin B12 & D
Older adults have increased need for:
Vitamin D & B12
Calcium & ?Zinc
The “only” decreased need:
Women have ↓ need for iron after menopause
Position of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrient Supplementation J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:2073-2085.
Foote JA, et al. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000;19:628-640.
Multiple Medical Conditions*
*Among fee -for -service Medicare Beneficiaries, 2010
Age-related loss of muscle mass AND strength
Not specific to frail individuals
Observed in “healthy”; well-nourished elderly
Lean mass >2 SD below the young normal mean
Sarcopenic obesity…loss of lean muscle with excess adipose tissue
Presents as: physical disabil ity, functional impairment, decreased physical performance, loss of independence, falls
Diet helps; strength training is key
Sarcopenia
Thomas, DR. Asia Pacific Geriatric Congress Hong Kong October 2012
Praddon-Jones, D et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(Suppl):1562S-1566S.
Frailty Syndrome
Prevalence: 3-6% of 65–70 yrs. and >16% aged 80+ Fried’s Frailty Syndrome Phenotype:
Weight loss >4.5 kg in past year
Exhaustion – often or most of the time
Very low to no physical activity
Low walking speed (<15’ in >6-7 sec)
Low hand grip strength
Etiology → many Treatable? Or, GFTT?
Multiple issues increase the complexity
Prevention: Strength training
Adequate protein and iron
Staying generally active
Fried LP, et al. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56A:M416-M156.
Sarcopenia
-muscle loss
-↓ muscle quality
Frailty
-fatigue
- ↓ activity
- ↓ weight
-cognitive impairment
-social isolation
↓ Physical
Function
-↓ muscle strength
-slow gait speed
-poor balance
Common and overlapping in older adults
Frail person may not be sarcopenic
Sarcopenic person is often, but not always,
frail
Sarcopenia vs. Frailty
Cesari M et al. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2014;6:Article 192
Geriatric Failure to Thrive (GFTT)
GFTT is not “normal”
Recognize & Intervene
Late-l ife syndrome defined by: Wt. loss >5% of baseline
↓ appetite….dehydration ….poor nutrition
Inactivity
Depression
Impaired immune function
Low cholesterol levels (<160 mg/dl and declining)
4 common syndromes; predictive of adverse outcomes: impaired physical function
malnutrition
depression
cognitive impairment
Robertson RG, Et al. Am Fam Physician. 2004;70:343-350.
Prevalence:
~5%-35% community
dwelling elders
~25%-40% nursing
home residents
Assessing Geriatric Failure to Thrive
Indications:
Depression Cognitive Impairment
Malnutrition Functional Impairment
Failure to Thrive
Investigation
Lab / diagnostics
MMSE, ADL, IADL, “Up & Go Test”
Geriatric depression scale
MNA ®
Rx review
Chronic disease evaluation
Assess environment
Adapted from Robertson RG, Et al. Am Fam Physician. 2004;70:343-350.
Assessing Geriatric Failure to Thrive
Depression
• Psychotherapy
• Antidepressants
• Modify environment
Malnutrition
• SLP Eval
• Treat oral pathology
• Review diet restrictions
• Inc. feedings
• Nutr. Supplements
• Tube feed?
Cognitive Impairment
• Optimize living conditions
• Treat depression
• Treat malnutrition
• Treat infection
• Dementia-delaying Rx
Functional Impairment
• PT
• OT
• Modify environment
With results, continue to treat.
If no/ minimal result conduct care planning. Repeat evals/end-of-life / hospice
The Challenge
ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
31
How do we get
older people
eating better?
We all “market & sell” ideas, plans, requests….
Know your audience
Message gain be “gain-framed” or “loss-framed”
Getting People to Follow the Plan
32ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Wansink B and Pope L. Nutrition Reviews. 2014;73:-11.
Characteristic Gain-framed may be more
effective
Loss-framed may be
more effective
Level of
involvement in the
issue
Low involvement High involvement
Certainty of
outcome
Certain Uncertain
Preference for risk Risk-adverse Risk-seeking
Need for cognition Heuristic processing Piecemeal processing
Research suggests that people respond best to ‘gain -
framed’ health messages for following coarse of action
Do not have highly detailed knowledge of health/nutrition
Not susceptible to ‘fear-based’ or ‘loss-based’ message
Getting People to Follow a Plan
33ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Wansink B and Pope L. Nutrition Reviews. 2014;73:-11.
“Mrs. Jones, I’d love for you to drink your milk
so you can continue to take those nice walks
with your grandkids when they visit.”
Instead of
“Mrs. Jones if you don’t eat more food with
calcium and protein you’re going to keep
losing bone density [and break bones].”
Getting People to Follow a Plan
34ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
“Mr. Smith eat-up so you
will feel better for bingo
this afternoon”
“One more bite Mr.
Smith and you’ll make
your wife so happy”
Getting People to Follow a Plan
35ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Equally portion protein across meals
Think Differently
36ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Layman DK 2009 Nutr and Met.
Kim, IY 2014 Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab.
Adequate Protein?
ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Breakfast Lunch Dinner
Juice Seafood Alfredo [3
oz. meat]
Shepherd’s Pie [2
oz. meat]
Cereal ½ c Kale ½ c Cauliflower
Canadian Bacon [1
oz.]
½ Apple Roll w/ Butter
1 sl Toast ½ c Mousse ½ Banana
Milk [8 oz.] Milk [8 oz.] Milk [8 oz.]
Total Pro: 18 Total Pro: 29 Total Pro: 30
25-30g Protein
ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Breakfast Lunch Dinner Snack
Orange Juice Meatloaf [4 oz] Vegetable Soup
Breakfast
Sandwich [1 egg, 1
oz. ham, 1 oz.
cheese in English
Muffin]
Whipped potatoes
with Gravy
Turkey Sandwich
[Bun, 3 oz. meat +
lettuce, tomato]
High protein bar
Milk or Yogurt 4 oz. Green Beans Chips Milk 4 oz. (or juice)
Vanilla Ice Cream Canned Peaches
Milk 4 oz. Milk 4 oz.
Total Pro = 28 Total Pro = 29 Total Pro = 29 Total Pro = 15-20
Eggs aren’t just for breakfast [and vice versa]
Breakfast ideas?
Yogurt → “plain”, smoothie, parfait
Sandwiches
Canadian Bacon & Cheese
Ham & Cheese
Peanut Butter
Other meats????
Sausage (rope kind)
E.g. sausage and potato skillet
Cheeses (and bread)
Mozzarella cheese sticks
Addressing The Egg Situation…
39
Protein Rich Snacks
Food Serving Size Protein (g)
Greek Yogurt, non-fat 5-6 oz. 11-13
Protein bars 1 bar 8-16+
Low-fat cottage cheese 1/2c 12
Almonds 1/4c 8
Pumpkin Seeds 1/4c 7
Milk 8 oz. 8
(String) Cheese 1 oz. 6-8
Boiled egg (large) 1 6
½ Bread & Meat
Sandwich
1 slice + 1 oz. 8-10
Vanilla Ice Cream ½ c 2
ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
9g if a High-Pro VIC
13g w/instant breakfast
↑ to 2 oz. meat + 6-7g
Use ONS for “milk” on cereal, as coffee creamer, as
base for cream soup, in mashed potatoes…etc.
“Poor man’s” ONS = add instant breakfast or dry milk
powder to milk
Adding Protein (& Calories)
41ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Low-fat Milk Standard ONS High Protein ONS
Calories / Ounce 15 31 31
Protein gm /
Ounce
1 1.25 1.75
ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 201542
Other Ideas?
Protein and calories are critical to health and well -
being at all ages – especially for the older person
Protein needs don’t change with age.
Protein utilization is less efficient in older adults
Current RDA is inadequate
Older adults need 1.2 – 1.5 g/kg high quality proteins to
offset anabolic resistance and promote muscle protein
synthesis
In Conclusion
43
B a u e r , J e t a l . E v i d e nc e - ba sed r e c o m m en da t i o ns f o r O p t i m a l d i e t a r y p r o t e i n i n t a k e i n o l d e r p e o p l e : a
p o s i t i o n p a p e r f r o m t h e P R O T -AGE s t u d y g r o u p . J A M D A . 2 0 1 3 ; 14 :5 42 -5 59 .
C e s a r i M , e t a l . S a r c o pe n i a a n d p h ys i c a l f r a i l t y : t w o s i d e s o f t h e s a m e c o i n . F r o n t i e r s i n A g i n g
N e u r o sc i en ce . 2 0 1 4 ; 6 :A r t i c l e 1 9 2 .
F o o t e J A e t a l . O l d e r a d u l t s n e e d g u i d a nce t o m e e t n u t r i t i o na l r e c o m m en da t i o ns . J A m C o l l N u t r .
2 0 0 0 ; 1 9 : 62 8 - 64 0 .
H i c k s J , M a l o S , O m o r i S , e t a l . C l i n i ca l N u t r i t i o n W e ek 2 0 1 5 I n t e r n a t i on a l A b s t ra c t o f D i s t i nc t i o n . A n
E x a m i n a t i on o f M e a s u re d vs P r e d i c te d R e s t i ng M e t a b o l i c R a t e I O l d e r A d u l t s L i v i n g i n L o n g - Te rm C a r e .
J P E N . 2 0 1 5 ; 3 9 : 252 .
H o u s t on D K , e t a l . D i e t a ry p r o t e i n i n t a k e i s a s s o c i a te d w i t h l e a n m a s s c h a n c e i n o l d e r c o m m un i t y -
d w e l l i ng a d u l t s : t h e H e a l t h A g i n g a n d B o d y C o m p os i t i o n ( H e a l th A B C ) S t u d y . A m J C l i n N u t r .
2 0 0 8 ; 8 7 : 15 0 - 15 5 .
K i m I - Y , S c h u z l e r S , S c h r ad e r A , e t a l . Q u a n t i t y o f d i e t a r y p r o t e i n i n t a k e , b u t n o t p a t t e r n o f i n t ak e ,
a f f e c t s n e t p r o t e i n b a l a n ce p r i m a r i l y t h o u g h d i f f e re nc es i n p r o t e i n s yn t h e s i s i n o l d e r a d u l t s . A m J
P h y s i o l E n d o c r i no l M e t a b . 2 0 1 4 ; 30 8 : E21 - E28 .
L i t c h f o rd M D . C o u n t e r ac t i n g t h e t r a j e c t o r y o f f r a i l t y a n d s a r c o pe n i a i n o l d e r a d u l t s . N u t r C l i n P r a c t .
2 0 1 4 ; 2 9 : 42 8 - 43 4 .
P r a d d on -J on es , D . e t a l . R o l e o f d i e t a r y p r o t e i n i n t h e s a r c o pe n i a o f a g i n g . A m J C l i n N u t r .
2 0 0 8 ; 8 7 ( su pp l ) : 15 2S - 15 6S .
R o b e r t son R G a n d M o n t a gn i n i M . G e r i a t r i c f a i l u r e t o t h r i ve . A m F a m P h ys i c i an . 2 0 0 4 ; 7 0 :3 43 - 3 50 .
S ym o ns T B , e t a l . A g i n g d o e s n o t i m p a i r t h e a n a b o l i c r e s p o n se t o a p r o t e i n - r i ch m e a l . A m J C l i n N u t r .
2 0 0 7 ; 8 6 : 45 1 - 45 6 .
W an s i nk B . a n d P o p e L . W he n d o g a i n - f r ame d h e a l t h m e s sa ge s w o r k b e t t e r t h a n f e a r a p p e a l s? N u t r i t i on
R e v i ew s . 2 0 1 4 ; 79 :4 - 11 .
W hi te J V , e t a l . N u t r i t i o n i n c h r o n i c d i s e a se m a n a gem e n t i n t h e e l d e r l y . N u t r . C l i n P r a c t . 2 0 0 3 ;1 8 : 3 - 11 .
References
44ANFP Minnesota State Meeting | St. Cloud | 2015
Thank you!