Sloshing in Arbitrary Shaped Tanks
Transcript of Sloshing in Arbitrary Shaped Tanks
246
(Read at the Autumn Meeting of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, November 1985)
Sloshing in Arbitrary Shaped Tanks
by N. E. Mikelis*, Member D. W. Robinson*
Summary
The paper describes a calculation procedure developed at Lloyd's Register of Shipping for
design purposes, based on a two-dimensional numerical finite-difference method which predicts
the sloshing behaviour of fluids in arbitrary shaped tanks when excited by ship motions in a
seaway.
The method overcomes some problems associated with model experiments. Furthermore,
tank shape, internal structure and excitation can be readily modelled and the calculation
provides realistic free surface behaviour and pressure time histories, including impacts. A standard excitation method is suggested which takes into account the important interactions
of fluid and ship natural periods and amplitudes of ship motions.
Other modes of excitation are also examined including one based on records of irregular
ships' motions and another based on a numerical model of the coupled phenomenon of sloshing
and ship motions.
1 Introduction
Sloshing of fluids in tanks is a phenomenon which
has concerned designers and Classification Societies
for a considerable time. Consequently efforts have
been devoted to produce procedures that ensure
structural adequacy by withstanding the predicted
sloshing pressures.
When liquid cargoes or ballast are carried in tanks
which are not completely full, ship motions can
create violent internal waves which impart dynamic
and impact pressures to the tank boundaries and
corresponding forces to the tank supports.
Although fill height is an important parameter
affecting the type of developed wave forms, which
include standing waves, travelling waves and hy-
draulic bores, it is now recognised that even very
high fillings in smooth tanks can cause problems").
Operational factors dictate that partial fillings are
desirable and therefore it is necessary to predict
the likely sloshing pressures at the design stage
for particular tanks and their structure. It is
hardly necessary to state that this is a difficult
problem given the non-linear nature of the pheno- menon and the number of variables. For a partic-
ular design, where tank dimensions and structural
arrangements are fixed, the following global para-
meters can vary to affect the load that is transmit-
ted to any point on the tank structure :
Cargo : varying density, viscosity
Filling Level : anything below say 97% could be
considered a partial filling Position of tank in ship : longitudinal, transverse-
and vertical location of otherwise identical tanks in a ship result in different excitation and hence sloshing characteristics
Loading Condition of ship : resulting in different natural periods of motions
Ship Operation : speed, heading Ship Motions : in specific short-term sea states
and long-term wave climate From a Classification Society's viewpoint, the
complexity of the problem is enlarged still further to include different tank designs, ship types, prin-cipal dimensions and, in some cases operating areas. Notwithstanding the almost infinite variability, it is essential that the Classification Society has an independent, and cost effective means of ensuring that the structure of a tank is adequate to with-stand the loads -induced by sloshing. The scale of the problem dictates the need for mathematical modelling to represent the three components of an assessment procedure, namely, excitation, fluid behaviour and structural analysis. In stressing the complexity of the problem, the non-absolute nature of the three components becomes obvious, and naturally, to justify the application of any proce- dure, this must be calibrated by service experience.
Section 2 of this paper describes an excitation
procedure, the purpose of which is to impart mo-tions to the tank which result in realistic and re-
presentative short-term and long-term maximum responses. Section 3 details a transient two-dimen-sional finite difference program used to predict
* Lloyd's Register of Shipping 71 Fenchurch
Street, London, UK
Sloshing in Arbitrary Shaped Tanks 247
fluid response to imparted excitation. The comput-ed pressures are at present used in a static struc-tural analysis which is based on a plastic collapse theory. However, as the procedure produces pres-sure time histories, work is underway at Lloyd's Register to match these with a dynamic structural capability. In Section 4, two alternative methods of excitation are examined, namely, forced irregu-lar motions, which can be derived from full scale measurements or from calculations, and one based on a numerical model of the coupled phenomenon of sloshing and ship motions.
2 Excitation Procedure
In addition to the global variables mentioned in section 1, other factors such as wall flexibility,
gas cushioning, bubble content and the transient nature of dynamic signals complicate the treatment of the sloshing problem. Usually these phenomena are either not correctly scaled in experiments or not included in numerical solutions and therefore, the derived loads (measured or computed) cannot be treated as absolute but have to be applied com-
paratively on the basis of a procedure that also accounts for previous experience.
For the procedure adopted at Lloyd's Register of Shipping, use is made of numerical simulation of liquid sloshing3). The objective of any scheme of excitation, which incidentally applies equally to
physical or mathematical modelling, is to ensure that one has considered a set of conditions that would give rise to a design maximum pressure envelope on the tank boundaries which can then be set against structural criteria to prevent damage.
There are normally two distinct forms of excita-tion adopted for sloshing analyses, namely, pure harmonic, where the response is examined at fixed
periods and amplitudes, and irregular, where a random motion is generated from selected spectra. At Lloyd's Register both these forms of excitation have been used but a type of 'Sloshing Excitation Spectrum' has finally been adopted, which employs a continuously and smoothly varying period and amplitude of motion. In this way a single com-
puter run covers excitation ranging from high amplitudes at periods close to the ship's natural
period, to lower amplitudes at other periods, so that the maximum design pressures are exposed at some combination of amplitude and period which is dependant on ship and tank conditions.
The adoption of a two-dimensional numerical solution necessitates the separate treatment of exci-tation in the longitudinal and transverse directions. Thus different runs simulate the roll/sway/heave and the pitch/heave motions. The effect of surge during excitation in the longitudinal direction has been ignored as it is considered to be negligible. All above degrees of freedom are excited at periods
which vary with time and at amplitudes which for
the translational motions are fixed, while the rota-
tional has its maximum at the ship's natural period
and an exponential decay at higher and lower peri-
ods. A narrower exponential function is used for
roll compared to pitch. Motion amplitudes and
variations with period are described by parametric
expressions which are based on numerous applica-
tions of the strip theory/sea spectra/wave climate
approach for a range of ship forms and short-term
wave spectra4•`6). To represent realistic minimum
values a lower limit is imposed to the exponential
decay of the rotational amplitudes (6•K in roll and
3•K in pitch). It should be pointed out that at high
periods of excitation the effect of introducing trans-
lational motions on the rotational one is small,
even if the amplitudes of the former motions are
large. Conversely at low periods of excitation the
combination of translations and rotation can result
in considerable sloshing when the relative phase
between the motions is chosen to model the 'rolling
against the wave' situation. Because at sea this
form of rolling is encountered at periods below the
ship's natural periody, the translational excitation
in the sloshing procedure was chosen to model the
`rolling against the wave' condition at all times
and at all periods. It is recognised that significant
sloshing would occur when the ship's natural per-
iod, Ts, and the liquid natural period, Tn, are very
close (synchronism). Conversely, as the separa-
tion between the two periods increases so sloshing
becomes less of a problem. In evaluating the liquid
period it is of course necessary to take into account
the effects of any internal stiffening and/or tank
chamfers.
The adopted excitation procedure takes into ac-
count the likelihood of synchronism and achieves
computational economy by restricting the range
of period variation to a convenient figure of 4
seconds. Based on numerical experiments which
used the 'Sloshing Excitation Spectrum' with long
period ranges and also from comparisons with the
Society's experience with sloshing problems, the
period range is centred so that it always includes
the ship's natural period but obtains a bias towards
the liquid period when the separation of periods
increases. In some cases this period separation
indicates where comprehensive analysis is not re-
quired, in which case a quasistatic approach is
adopted. Figure 1 provides an example of the
`Sloshing Excitation Spectrum'.
The adopted excitation procedure therefore
achieves a consistent and economic solution compar-
ed with the harmonic or irregular forms which
would necessitate numerous tests or a very long
simulation to establish worst conditions.
248 Journal of The Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol.158
3 The Mathematical Model
The fluid motions and exerted pressures from a
given excitation of a partially filled tank are evaluat-
ed using a mathematical model of the two-dimen-
sional problem. For this purpose the computer
program LR. FLUIDS3) has been developed, based
on the SOLA SURF code8) which in turn was based
on the MAC method9). The LR. FLUIDS program
may be considered as an extension and generalisa-
tion of the work by Navickas et at10. Navickas
used SOLA-SURF to model a two-dimensional
prismatic tank with a ceiling and extended the
code to model liquid compressibility during impacts
on the ceiling assuming small changes of density.
It was reportedm that comparisons of compressible
and incompressible types of pressure with experi-
ments showed qualitative agreement, while very
good agreement was observed on comparisons of
free surface motions.
The adopted mathematical model provides a tran-
sient solution by progressing in small time incre-
ments. For each of these time steps an iterative
Finite Difference scheme updates the velocity and
pressure fields so that these satisfy the conservation
of momentum (Navier-Stokes) and conservation
of mass (Continuity) equations and also satisfy all
the boundary conditions which describe the tank
and its motion. The relevant equations and their
Finite Difference expressions are described adequate-
ly in references8•`10) while most of the LR. FLUIDS
developments are discussed in 3). For economy of
space only a brief description and comments are
considered necessary here.
The Navier-Stokes equations provide a non-linear
description of the problem which is necessary for
realistic modelling in view of the violent liquid
motions at resonance. The equations include vis-
cous effects with the laminar viscosity term. It
must be pointed out, however, that numerical
experiments have shown that viscosity does not
affect the liquid's sloshing response. Furthermore,
as discussed in11), this is confirmed by experiments
using liquids of different viscosities.
The incompressible continuity equation has been
modified to a slightly compressible one by the in-
clusion of a term describing small density changes
(eg. seem10)). The effect of this term is discussed
later in this section. In order to avoid the unreali-
stic pressure jumps due to the discontinuous nature
of time stepping the buffering scheme devised in
reference12) has been adopted. In this scheme, and
in its variant adopted by Arai13), the algorithm
progressively increases the pressure in cells where
the liquid is about to impact the tank's ceiling.
This pressure increase has the effect of slowing
the upward speed of the free surface until at the
moment of impact this speed is zero.
The code has been extended to include boundary
conditions which allow for any excitation composed
of two translational and one rotational motions.
The rotation is defined about any specified origin
and the relative phase angles are chosen at will.
Figure 1 provides one example of motion imparted
to a tank. In addition to the SOLA capabilities
LR. FLUIDS has boundary conditions which allow
the modelling of two-dimensional tanks with inter-
nal structure, chamfers or of U-shaped tanks.
Also the free surface boundary condition has been
improved to enable the treatment of steep free
surfaces and of free surfaces in the vicinity of
vertical internal structure. For this purpose an
Fig. 1 Typical sloshing excitation time histories
of : variation of Period and of Roll, Sway and Heave amplitudes (Tolling Against Waves' condition)
Fig. 2 Free surface realisations at one eighth of a
period intervals for a shallow filled rectan-
gular tank in harmonic roll motion
Sloshing in Arbitrary Shaped Tanks 249
averaging process over the free surface 'step' ac-
counts for the fluid velocity and free surface slope
in the equation used to update the surface height
h, ie.
where v is the vertical fluid velocity, ii is the
averaged horizontal fluid velocity over the step and
dh/dx is the'effective, free surface slope. Figures
2,3 and 4 provide examples relevant to the above
discussion.
Typical Finite Difference grids employed by LR.
FLUIDS are composed of 300 to 400 cells, although
this number may be increased to account for details
of the internal structure. The cells are rectan-
gular and of constant width and height. From sen-sitivity studies it has been established that the
grid density used is adequate. The only area where
grid refinement improves results is in chamfers, which of necessity are modelled here as stepped
lines. This could be refined further by the adop-
tion of more complex boundary conditions.
Fugures 5, 6 and 7 show typical comparisons be-
tween computed and experimentally measured pres-
sures, in Pascals, and free surface elevation, in
metres, for a 1 : 40 model of a prismatic tank in
Fig. 3 Free surface and velocity field realisations
for a rectangular tank with internal struc-
ture, in harmonic roll, sway and heave
motions
Fig. 4 Free surface and velocity field realisations
at quarter period intervals, for a prismatic
tank in harmonic roll motion. Also shown
are the locations of pressure transducers and
of free surface height recorder for the tank
model of figures 5-7
Fig. 5 Experimental and computed pressures in
Pascals at transducer locations R1, R2 and
free surface height in metres at position
HR : Roll, h/D=0. 15, T =1. 532 sec, ƒ³=
O. 1 rads
Fig. 6 Experimental and computed pressures in
Pascals at transducer locations R1, R2, R3 and
free surface height in metres at position
HR : Roll, h/D=0. 46, T =1.207 sec, ƒ³=0. 1
rads.
250 Journal of The Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol. 158
pure roll and in a diagonal rotation. Other test conditions3), which also included pure pitching,
produced the same level of agreement to that shown in figures 5-7 here. The positions of the pressure transducers and free surface height recorder are
given in figure 4. The transducers which recorded roll response(R) were placed along the centreplane of the tank, while the transducers used for the 'diagonal' excitation(D) were on one of the two
edges which did not intersect with the axis of rotation. The signals from computation and from experiment are intentionally offset in the time scale as shown on figure 5, to ease visual comparison. The results shown in figures 5-7 are for resonant conditions for three different fill heights at one of two different amplitudes. The agreement is very good for the free surface and the dynamic pressure time histories. It is noted that the computation has also depicted the secondary peaks in the signals, resulting probably from smaller travelling waves. In other comparisons3)which included transducers on the chamfer of the tank, the computation was seen to overestimate the duration and the magnitude of the pressure pulse on the chamfer by a moderate amount, as it might reasonably be expected from the approximation of a sloping surface by a stepp-ed one.
Impact pressures, as differentiated from the dyna-mic ones, pose a more subtle problem when com-
paring theory with experiment and when they must be applied to consider the adequacy of a de- sign. When the time step was halved in the com-
putation then the impulsive pressure was seen to exactly double while the dynamic component re-mained virtually unaffected. On reflection this is a consistent result, since it shows that the impulse
(force-time integral) is time-step independent. Numerical experiments were conducted with the LR. FLUIDS program, whereby a horizontal free surface was made to rise uniformly and subsequent-ly to impact on a horizontal ceiling which did not extend to the full length of the free surface. This allowed the fluid to escape after impact around both ends of the ceiling. A wide range of time steps was employed, ensuring that at the upper end of the range the free surface, and at the lower end of the range the sound, would travel only through a given fraction of a cell. Two versions of the LR. FLUIDS code were tested, one with the incom-
pressible and the other with the slightly compress-ible continuity equations. When the time step, was of the order that is normally adopted in slosh- ing calculations, the two versions gave identical results and both showed the impact pressure doubl ing when the time step was halved. Furthermore when the time step was reduced to the order which allows acoustic pressure waves to propagate (frac-tion of millisecond) then the incompressible version kept on exactly doubling the pressure with no limit in sight. The compressible version however reached a constant impact pressure with no effect from further reductions in time step size. The value of this pressure at the centre of the impacted area was precisely equal to the product of the fluid's density times the speed of sound in the fluid times
the velocity of the impacting free surface. The
pressure reduced away from the centre of the im-pacted surface, towards the open ends. Also fol lowing the impact a steep pressure wave propagated through the finite difference grid with speed equal
to the speed of sound in the fluid. Numerical diffusion however reduced the steepness of this wave as it progressed and as it reflected on different boundaries. All this behaviour was confirmed for various configurations and physical constants of the fluid.
LR. FLUIDS thus proved to be a promising tool for the study of impacts. For a number of rea-sons, however, an obvious one being economy in computation and another one being associated with
present inadequacies in implementing acoustic type of pressures in design, it was not considered desir-
able to proceed with computations employing such small time steps. The problem remained, how-ever, what to do with the relative nature of im-
pact pressure magnitudes. This was tackled by the development of an automatic selection of time step
which was calibrated using experimental data of
pressures on the chamfer and ceiling of the pris-matic tank discussed earlier. It should be pointed out that this development was completed after
producing the comparison for transducer R 7 in figure 7. The automatic selection of time step was
Fig. 7 Experimental and computed pressures in
Pascals at transducer locations R3, D3, R4, D4,
R7, D7 and free surface height in metres at
position HR : Roll and Diagonal, h/D=0. 75,
T=1. 056 sec, ƒ³=0.25 rads.
Sloshing in Arbitrary Shaped Tanks 251
designed to ensure that following an update of velocities no part of the fluid would have travelled more than a certain fraction of a cell. If this condition is violated the simulation steps back in time and repeats the computation with the time step set to half of the previous value. Further-more, when the inspection of fluid velocities indi-cates that a larger time step can be used, this is implemented at the next cycle. The numerical value of the cell fraction condition was chosen as one eighth(1/8) so as : (i) to provide a general agreement between measurement and computation and (ii) to produce impact pressures which when applied to the structural analysis -procedure adopted. at Lloyd's, fits well with the Society's long experi- ence. In the future however a re-examination of this problem is likely to tie in with further deve-lopments presently taking place on analysis of struc-tures under impulsive loads.
A limitation of LR. FLUIDS is that it can model only two-dimensional problems. In the experi-ments, from which Figures 5-7 are drawn, an at-tempt was made to quantify the three-dimensional effect by imparting a diagonal excitation to the tank. In this situation, it was observed that when the forcing period was away from either the nat-ural period of the liquid in the roll plane, or of that in the pitch plane, there was little liquid motion. Also when the forcing period was at or
near either of the natural periods, the liquid mo-tion was confined in the plane of the motion whose
period was excited. This clear separation of res- ponses is attributed to the fact that the tank's breadth to length ratio (=1. 86) resulted in distinct-ly different natural periods in the two principal
planes and thus each of these motions was excited separately at corresponding periods in the diagonal excitation experiments. This phenomenon is also reflected on the pressure recordings made on the edge of the tank, as seen for example in figure 7
where experimental measurements of pressure from diagonal tests follow the time history of those from
pure roll tests conducted at the same period of excitation. The wave height recorder was not functioning during the diagonal excitation tests and thus no data are available. In all cases tested
the pressures on the tank's edge obtained from diagonal excitation were never of dissimilar magni-tude from those recorded in the pure roll or pure
pitch tests at corresponding periods. Naturally, it is expected that if a tank's breadth to length
ratio tends to unity, then the roll and pitch natural
periods of the liquid would approach each other and the funnelling effect would magnify the loads on the tank's edges. In considering however the like-lihood or unlikelihood of diagonal flow, the effect of internal structure must not be ignored, since this
increases the natural period in the plane normal to
the direction the internal structure runs. A com-
puter eigenvalue analysis has been purposely devel-oped at Lloyd's for the calculation of the natural
period and of higher harmonics of liquid contained in two-dimensional tanks of arbitrary geometry.
To account for the three-dimensional effect of
flow on pressure, various authors have adopted the
square root of the sum of squares of pressures
obtained from separate roll and pitch experiments.
It may well be a sensible generalisation to adopt
this sum of squares in all cases, that is regardless
of the tank's breadth to length ratio. However it
would only be appropriate to combine in this man-
ner the maximum pressures obtained at the same
excitation period, in which case if roll and pitch
resonances are well separated then the three-dimen-
sional effect should again be predicted as being
negligible.
There are applications which require a knowledge
of the forces and moment exerted by the fluid on
a part of a tank's structure, such as an internal
member or a bulkhead, or in the complete tank.
These loads may be used for example for the esti-
mation of tripping moments on a stiffener or gir-
der, for the evaluation of dynamic loads on supports
of independent tanks, and, when the sloshing in-
duced dynamic loads are of sufficiently large magni-
tude, in the description of the coupled phenomenon
of sloshing and ship motions, as discussed in section
4. The fluid induced forces and moment are ob-
Fig.8 Time histories of forced rolling motion and
of computed sloshing induced horizontal and
vertical forces and moment on the tank of
figure 2.
252 Journal of The Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol. 158
tamed in LR. FLUIDS by integrating the pressure around the part of the tank's structure in question, or around all the 'wet' boundaries when the total loads are required. The integration is repeated every time step of the simulation. A technique for extrapolating pressure from the cell's centre, where it is computed, to the tank's boundary, where it is integrated, had to be devised3). Figures 8 and 9 provide examples of computed time histories of sloshing induced loads. Figure 8 shows the harmonic roll forced excitation and the fluid in duced forces and moment on the shallow filled rectangular tank of figure 2. For interest, the non-linear nature of the induced loads and the 10% increase of 'effective weight' of the fluid from the
given excitation are noted. Also as a check it is noted that following a Fourier analysis of the ver-tical force component signal, the constant term of the series exactly equals the static weight of the fluid. Figure 9 shows the time histories of forced harmonic excitation in roll, sway and heave and the liquid induced horizontal force on the bulkhead of the tank of figure 3. The considerable increase of the force, from the static value of about O. 3 MN to the dynamic value of 1. 3 MN, should be noted.
To establish confidence in the use of the computed sloshing induced loads, comparisons were conducted with experimental measurements of induced mo-ment on a rectangular tank and on the prismatic tank of figure 43). These comparisons covered ran-
ges of the following variables : period and ampli-tude of rotational excitation, fill height and posi-tion of the centre of rotation. Figure 10 shows for the prismatic tank such a comparison for the magnitude of the first harmonic component of the induced moment signal and for the phase angle between this harmonic and the forced oscillation. Results for a range of dimensionless frequencies are presented. In all tested cases the agreement between computation and experiment has been shown3) to be very satisfactory.
4 Other Forms of Excitation
A particular strength of the LR. FLUIDS slosh-ing simulation computer program is the generality of excitation it allows. In addition to the excita- tion procedure described in Section 2 of this paper, the following alternatives are available :
4.1 Harmonic Forced Excitation In this case the user decides if the tank is to
be excited in 1, 2 or 3 degrees of freedom. The harmonic forced motion is then defined by a period, an amplitude and a phase angle for each of the invoked degrees of freedom. The phase angles can be specified such that a realistic representation of the ship's behaviour is simulated. For example, the ship may be forced to roll 'with' or 'against' the wave, and this would depend on the relation between the period of excitation and the ship's natural period.
4.2 Irregular Forced Excitation The tank's motion can also be specified as records
of irregular signals of displacements, velocities and accelerations. These signals may be recordings of real ship motions or can be generated numerically from sea spectra.
Fig. 9 Time histories of forced motions and of
computed sloshing induced horizontal force
per unit length on the end wall (bulkhead) of the tank of figure 3
Fig. 10 Experimental and computed dimensionless
amplitude and phase angle of sloshing
induced moment on the tank of figure 4
(pure roll, h/D=0. 45, ƒ³=0. 1 rads)
Sloshing in Arbitrary Shaped Tanks 253
4.3 Coupled Sloshing and Ship Motions In this mode of excitation the simulation pro-
ceeds in time by a parallel and coupled set of com-
putations of ship motion equations and of the slosh-ing analysis. As the liquid cargo moves, it trans-mits a force and a moment on the tank and con-sequently onto the ship. These liquid induced loads are computed for every time step by an in-tegration of the pressures around the tank bound-ary, as discussed earlier, and are introduced in equations which model ship motions. In turn these equations are solved, thus providing values of displacements, velocities and accelerations which are used to excite the sloshing simulation in the subsequent time step.
This process, which is repeated for as long as is required, relies on the input of frequency depen-dent ship hydrodynamic data, from say a strip theory analysis. The definition of excitation is then simply made by the specification of the inci-dent wave's height and period. It is also worth noting here that the additional computational ef-fort required for the coupled solution is negligible.
This method of analysis has been verified3,14) by comparisons with model scale measurements on a
products carrier in beam waves of various heights and periods. The ship model has tanks built in, which carry either solid or liquid cargo. The comparisons were initially conducted using a one degree of freedom (roll) coupling. This was sub-sequently extended to a model of three and to a
pseudo-five degrees of freedom coupling. For the sake of completeness the results from
these comparisons are shown on figures 11 and 12
for free and for forced rolling respectively. Apart
from the good agreement demonstrated for forced
rolling on figure 12, excellent agreement was also
found in the free rolling comparisons where the
measured and computed natural periods of the ship
were practically identical for both solid and liquid
cargo conditions. The metacentric height correc-
tion for the presence of the free surface is not
applied in the three degree coupled analysis, be-
cause the underlining phenomenon is implicitly ac-
counted by the communication of liquid induced
loads to the ship motions equations. In the parti-
cular case of ship, tank and filling level shown
here, the natural periods of ship and of liquid
cargo happen to be well separated. As expected,
during the slow large motions resulting from waves
with periods near the ship's natural period, the
computed free surface remains almost horizontal.
Therefore the results of computations at such ex-
citation provide a simple and direct verification of
the coupling method when compared with the tra-
ditional free surface correction to the metacentric
height. When however the liquid cargo and ship
natural periods are closer, then the free surface
correction used for assessing stability would clearly
be inadequate since the liquid would not remain
horizontal and the assumed wedge shape of mass
transfer would underestimate the free surface ef-
fect.
Figures 13 and 15 illustrate the coupled sloshing
Fig. 11 Experimental and computed non-dimen-
sional logarithmic decrement and computed
angular displacement of a products carrier
ship model in free rolling from 10•K, with
solid and with liquid cargo in three tanks
filled at h/D=0. 45 (tank shown on figure
4)
Fig.12 Experimental and computed roll response
of a products carrier ship model, incorpora-ting three tanks (shown on figure 4) filled at h/D=0. 45 with solid and with liquid cargo in beam waves at zero forward speed
(values appropriate to full scale)
254 Journal of The Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol.158
and three degrees of freedom ship motions analy-
sis. The wave amplitude is comparable in these
two cases, but in figure 13 the wave period corres-
ponds to the ship's natural period while in figure
15 it corresponds to the liquid cargo's natural pe-
riod. In the former the resulting roll amplitude
is relatively large but does not excite sloshing (10•K
in the steady state, as is shown on figure 14 which
illustrates the computed time history of motion).
However, while the shorter wave of figure 15 does
not cause any appreciable roll (2. 5•K in the steady
state, as shown on figure 16) considerable sloshing
is induced.
5 Concluding Remarks
A procedure based on a numerical solution for
assessing the effect of sloshing in partially filled
tanks has been discussed. This procedure repre-
sents a consistent and efficient method for the de-
termination of design loads.
Using the LR. FLUIDS program, together with
specially developed computer animated graphics
output, a designer can 'see' the effect of varying
tank configurations and filling levels and can obtain
pressure time histories in a fraction of the time
and cost of equivalent model tests.
The computer resources required by LR. FLUIDS
are not excessive, typically being between 20 and
40 CPU seconds per simulated period, in the Soci-
ety's mainframe computer. The exact figure de-
pends on the severity of motion, amount of detail
in the modelled tank, fill height etc.
The two-dimensional analysis is applicable to
most tank designs in view of the usually large
separation between the natural periods of the liquid
cargo in the longitudinal and in the transverse
directions of the tank. For some of the cases
where three-dimensional effects may be important,
the two-dimensional approach may need calibration
in the lines originally proposed in section 3.
The paper finally discusses different schemes of
excitation which can be used for a variety of stud-
ies.
Fig.13 Coupled analysis of sloshing and three
degrees of freedom ship motions for a pro-
ducts carrier ship (T=20, 5 sec, Ā=2. 3 m)
Fig. 14 Computed time histories of ship motions
from a coupled analysis for the case shown
on figure 13
Fig.15 Coupled analysis of sloshing and three
degrees of freedom ship motions for a pro-
ducts carrier ship (T =7 . 6 sec, Ā=2. 5 m)
Fig.16 Computed time histories of ship motions
from a coupled analysis for the case shown
on figure 15
Sloshing in Arbitrary Shaped Tanks 255
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to Lloyd's
Register of Shipping for permission to publish this
paper and also acknowledge Mr J. K Miller's con-
tribution in fundamental areas of this work.
Notation
B: Breadth of tank
C : Sloshing induced moment on tank
D: Depth of tank
K: = (2 ƒÎ)-1 ln(ƒÓ(t)/ƒÓ(t+Ts)), roll decrement
L: Length of tank
OXY : Inertial frame of reference, Y positive up-
wards
T : Period of forced motion
Tn: Natural period of liquid
Ts: Natural rolling period of ship
g: Gravitational constant
h: Liquid height in tank
t: Time
εt : Phase angle between sloshing induced mo.
ment and roll displacement, negative for lag-
ging moment
ζ : Wave height amplitude
μα : =C/(ρgB3L), non-dimensional amplitude of
sloshing induced moment
ρ : Density
φ : Amplitude of roll motion
φ : rotational displacement in roll
φ : = (φ(t)+φ(t+Ts))/2, average roll displace-
ment in free rolling tests
ω : Frequency of excitation
References
1) Bass, R. L., Bowles, E. B. and Cox, P. A.:
'Liquid Dynamic Loads in LNG Cargo Tanks'
Trans. SNAME, Vol. 88, pp. 103•`126, 1980.
2) Yoshimura, N., Tanaka, T., Endo, S., Jibiki, Y.
and Umekawa, N.: 'The Estimation of maxi-
mum Sloshing Pressure on Newly Designed
Membrane LNG Tanks' Tsu Research Labora-
tories Report, Nippon Kokan K. K., Japan,
1983.
3) Mikelis, N. E., Miller, J. K. and Taylor, K. V.:
'Sloshing in Partially Filled Liquid Tanks
and its Effect on Ship Motions : Numerical
Simulations and Experimental Verification'
The Naval Architect, RINA October, 1984.
4) Blixell, C. A.: 'Calculation of Ship Responses
in Regular Waves by Strip Theory' RATAS
Report No. 5116, Lloyd's Register of Shipp-
ing, 1972.
5) Robinson, D. W.: 'Calculation of Non-Dimen-
sional Variance of Wave Induced Responses'
Development Unit Report No. 225, Lloyd's
Register of Shipping, 1977.
6) Robinson, D. W.: `Long-Term Predictions of
Wave-Induced Ship Responses. Rev. 2' De-
velopment Unit Report No. 28. Lloyd's Re-
gister of Shipping, 1972.
7) Price, W. G. and Bishop R. E. D.: 'Probabilis-
tic Theory of Ship Dynamics' Publ. Chap-
man and Hall, London, 1974.
8) Hirt, C. W., Nichols, B. D. and Romero, N. C. : `SOLA -A Numerical Solution Algorithm for
Transient Fluid Flows' Los Alamos Scienti-
fic Laboratory, Report LA-5852, 1975.
9) Welch, J. E., Harlow, F. H., Shannon, J. P. and
Daly, B. J.: 'The MAC Method, a Comput-
ing Technique for Solving Viscous, Incom-
pressible, Transient Fluid-Flow Problems
Involving Free Surfaces' Los Alamos Sci-
entific Laboratory, Report LA-3425, 1965.
10) Navickas, J., Peck, J. C., Bass III, R. L., Bowles,
E. B., Yoshimura, N. and Endo, S.: 'Sloshing
of Fluids at High-Fill Levels in ClosedTanks'
ASME Winter Meetings, Washington D. C.,
pp. 191,198, 1981.
11) Bass, R. L., Bowles, E. B., Trudell, R. W., Navi-
ckas, J., Peck, J. C., Yoshimura, N., Endo, S.
and Pots, B. F. M.: 'Modelling Criteria for
Scaled LNG Sloshing Experiments' ASME,
June, 1983.
12) Nichols, B. D. and Hirt, C. W.: 'Numerical Si-
mulation of Hydrodynamic Impact Loads on
Cylinders' Nuclear Science and Engineering,
Vol. 68, No. 143, pp. 143-448, 1978.
13) Arai, M.: 'Experimental and Numerical
Study of Sloshing Pressure in Liquid Cargo
Tanks' Journees Vibrations Chocs, 1984•`
1985, Lyon.
14) Mikelis, N. E. and Journee, J. M. J.: 'Experi-
mental and Numerical Simulations of Slosh-
ing Behaviour in Liquid Cargo Tanks and of
its Effect on Ship Motions' Intern. Confer-
ence on Numerical Methods for Transient
and Coupled Problems, Pine Ridge Press,
Venice, 1984.