Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

20
Modeling the effect of sloshing on ship motions Tim Bunnik, MARIN

Transcript of Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

Page 1: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

Modeling the effect of sloshing on

ship motions

Tim Bunnik, MARIN

Page 2: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

2ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Contents

– Problem definition

– Linear diffraction method for sloshing effect on

ship motions

– ComFLOW coupling to ship motion code for

sloshing effect on ship motions

– Conclusions

Page 3: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

3ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Problem definition

Francescutto and Contento, ISOPE 1994

Page 4: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

4

Problem definition

R0 R1

R2

R3

Gaillarde, RINA 2004

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 5: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

5

Problem definition

Molin, OMAE 2008. This dataset was used for validation.

2 3 4 5 6 7 80

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

frequency [rad/s]

roll

RA

O [ra

d/m

]

closed tank

open tank

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 6: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

6

Linear Diffraction Method

• Potential flow

• Small ship motions and waves

• Boundary element method

• MARIN program DIFFRAC

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 7: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

7

Linear Diffraction Method

• Water in the tank is modeled as

1. Rigid mass+

2. Frequency dependent added mass+

3. Hydrostatic restoring force (GM free-surface correction)

• There is no damping force from the tank since there is no

radiation of waves

• Computation on model scale

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 8: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

8

Linear Diffraction Method

Sloshing modes n=1

n=2

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Odd sloshing modes

unbounded in linear diffraction

theory

Page 9: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

9

Linear Diffraction Method

0 2 4 6 8 10 12-5

0

5

10

15

20

frequency [rad/s]

roll

ad

de

d m

ass/r

oll

ine

rtia

[-]

barge with open tank containing 29 cm of water

DIFFRAC =0

DIFFRAC =0.01

DIFFRAC =0.02

0i12

xg

xz

Additional damping

on free surface

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 10: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

10

Linear Diffraction Method

Roll RAO with

closed water tank

Very good!

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 11: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

11

Linear Diffraction Method

Roll RAO with

open tank

Reasonable, but

far from perfect

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 12: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

12

ComFLOW coupling for ship motions

Sloshing loads

Pre-defined motions

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Old situation:

Comflow.exe

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 13: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

13

ComFLOW coupling for ship motions

Sloshing loads

New situation:

Comflow.lib

Body motion program

F=m * a

Motions

Velocities

Accelerations

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 14: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

14

ComFLOW coupling for ship motions

• STEP_IN_TIME()

• get_time(T_comflow,TMAX)

• set_moving_frame(T_next, motion, velocity, acceleration)

• get_force_FRCBX(iBOX, FORCE, MOMENT, x, y, z)

Interface routines:

Coupling made with aNySIM: In-house code for time-domain

simulation of ship motions

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 15: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

15

• Linear diffraction analysis for the barge

• The sloshing tank is modeled with ComFLOW

• 2D 1-phase simulations (1 cell in longitudinal direction)

• Simulations on model scale

• 400 seconds irregular beam waves to determine roll RAO

Hs=0.06 m Tp=1.6 s

ComFLOW coupling for ship motions

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 16: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

16

ComFLOW coupling for ship motions

Very coarse grid (20x12) ~ hours

Coarse grid (40x23) ~ 1 day

Fine grid (80x46) ~ 3 days

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 17: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

17

ComFLOW coupling for ship motions

3 4 5 6 7 80

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

frequency [rad/s]

roll

RA

O [ra

d/m

]

Closed tanks seastate irr1.

aNySIM-ComFLOW verycoarse

Molin [2008]

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

•Closed tank

•Water modelled with

ComFLOW

•No free surface

Page 18: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

18

ComFLOW coupling for ship motions

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

• Open tank, airgap 16 cm

• Good agreement

• Small grid effects

3 4 5 6 7 80

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

frequency [rad/s]

roll

RA

O [ra

d/m

]

Flat roof 16 cm above still water level. Seastate irr1.

aNySIM-ComFLOW very coarse

aNySIM-ComFLOW coarse

aNySIM-ComFLOW fine

Molin [2008]

Page 19: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

19

Conclusions

• Coupling between ComFLOW and ship motion code (aNySIM) is

working well

• Reasonable results Molin dataset with linear diffraction method

• Good results Molin dataset with ComFLOW/aNySIM method

• ComFLOW library with interfaces will be made available in the first

deliverable of ComFLOW-3, so users can couple it to their own

simulation programs

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009

Page 20: Sloshing Effect on Ship Motions

20

The end

Next JIP week

19-23 April 2010 - Aberdeen

Dinner

Gather 19.00 in lobby

ComFLOW-3 meeting, San Francisco, November 9, 2009