Slides [ppt]

download Slides [ppt]

of 51

  • date post

    25-Jun-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    276
  • download

    0

Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Slides [ppt]

  • 1. Rationale for the Strategic Asset Allocation in the Norwegian Government Petroleum FundPresentation to The Actuarial Profession Investment Conference,26June 2000byKnutN.Kjr , NorgesBank Investment Management www. norges -bank.noknut -n. kjaer @ norges -bank.no

2. Agenda

  • Background - Norway, oil and fund
  • Strategic issues
  • The benchmark composition
  • Division of responsibilities
  • Strategy to achieve excess performance
  • Results

3. Norway at a glance

  • Population4.5 mill.
  • GDP$ 155 bill.
  • GDP/person$ 34,600
  • Surplus at the central government budget: $ 15.5 bill. 10%of GDP
  • Surplus at the current account: $ 17.8 bill.

4. The petroleum sector

  • Norway is the worlds second largest net exporter of oil
  • Value added in production of petroleum is 16 percent of GDP
  • Petroleum exports representis 43 percent of total exports
  • 10 percent of the government petroleum revenues will be spent on the central government budget in 2000

5. The Petroleum Fund

  • The Government Petroleum Fund was established by law in 1990
  • The inflow to the Fund is the yearly surplus of the central government account
  • The first transfer occurred in May 1996
  • The fund is not formally a pension fund but is used by the government to manage the budget surplus / deficit
  • The fund may become an important tool for coping with the financial challenges connected with an ageing population and declining oil revenues

6. Growth of the Petroleum Fund Estimates 7. Strategic issues

  • From petroleum to financial assets
  • Macroeconomic concerns
  • Pension system and expenditures

8. From petroleum to financial assets

  • Investments in the Petroleum Fund represent a diversification of national wealth from petroleum in the ground to financial assets
  • Simple efficient frontier analysis based on historical data shows that this transformation reduces risk and increases return

9. 10. Norways national wealth Percentage distribution 11. Macroeconomic concerns

  • How much of the petroleum revenues can be used in the mainland economy?
  • How can one avoid turning the Petroleum Fund investments into a second budget, undermining the role of the parliament in the ordinary budget process?

12. Use of the Petroleum Fund

  • Petroleum Fund Act:
    • The capital of the Fund may only be used for transfers to the central government budget pursuant to a resolution by the Storting (Norwegian parliament). The capital of the Fund may not be used for any other purpose, including the provision of credit to central government or to private sector entities.

13. Why does the Fund invest abroad?

  • Budget concern
    • The Petroleum Fund should not be a second budget
  • Monetary policy concern
    • The petroleum activity yields substantial currency income
    • Accumulation of foreign reserves counteracts appreciation of the currency
  • Sector balance concern
    • Real appreciation would shift resources to non-competitive sectors ; avoid Dutch disease
  • Investment concern
    • Better return on risk abroad

14. Share of government petroleum income invested in the Petroleum Fund 15. Pension system and expenditures

  • The core of the Norwegian pensions are publicly financed
  • The public pension system is a two tier compulsory system
  • The public pension expenditures will almost double as a share of GDP over the next 30 years
  • While the petroleum revenues must be expected to decrease significantly

16. Pension expenditures Petroleum revenues 17. The benchmark composition

  • Following from the strategic background: The Fund shall only invest in financial assets abroad
  • Important issues in deciding the investment strategy -Asset classes and asset allocation -Regional allocation -Risk tolerance

18. Strategic asset allocation

  • Purpose of the Fund
      • In terms of the Petroleum Fund, it is natural to apply a long investment horizon and to recognize the importance of preserving the Fund's international purchasing power"(Revised National Budget 1997)
  • Two implications
    • should not focus on short-term fluctuations in return
    • should not measure return in Norwegian kroner
  • The strategy was changed in January 1998 to include equities

19. Asset classes

  • Fixed income: At least 90 per cent of the bond portfolio shall be securities with a government guarantee and the last 10 per cent must be of investment grade quality
  • Private equities and properties are not yet considered

20. 21. Determining the equity portion

  • Using these historical returns (1926-1990), it would take 139 years of investing in Treasury bills to double ones real wealth while it would take only 11 years of stock investmentSiegel (1992)
  • In 1997, Norges Bank advised the Ministry of Finance to invest in equities
  • The benchmark weight of 40 per cent can be viewed as the owners return-to-risk preference

22. Country allocation

  • As always: A trade-off between return and risk
  • Return
    • assume that expected returns in the long run are equal in all (industrial) countries
  • Risk-a compromise between
    • Hedge for currency risk of imports
    • Diversification of market risk
    • Diversification of national wealth
  • Size of the markets could be a restriction

23. Regional weights mainly determined by GDP-weights : AmericasEuropeAsia Old guidelines 18 75 7 Import weights 10 81 9 GDP weights42 38 20 Market weights - bonds 33 47 20 Market weights - equities 55 32 13 New guidelines 30 50 20 24. Country weights within regions

  • Equities: Market capitalisation weights FTSE index
  • Fixed Income: GDP weights Salomon Smith Barney Government Bond index
  • Emerging markets included in the investment universe from 1 January, 2000. Not in the benchmark yet.

25. Benchmark for the Petroleum Fund

  • Benchmark
  • Equities 40 %
  • Bonds 60 %
  • America
  • 30 %
  • Europe
  • 50 %
  • Asia and Oceania
  • 20 %
  • America
  • 30 %
  • Europe
  • 50 %
  • Asia and Oceania
  • 20 %

26. The risk tolerance given in the Fund Management Mandate

  • Direct restrictions on asset allocation
  • Limits on expected deviations from the benchmark portfolio
  • Bond duration between 3 and 7
  • Maximum 3 per cent ownership of any one company
  • Limits on credit risk
  • General clause: Norges Bank shall ensure that satisfactory risk systems and control routines exist for those instruments to be used in the management of the Fund

27. Expected tracking error

  • Tracking error as a risk measure is used to limit the difference in expected return between the actual portfolio and benchmark
  • An upper limit of tracking error implies that the actual return with a certain probability will vary within a band around the return of the benchmark
  • Maxium expected tracking error is 1.5 per cent
  • Expected tracking error is calculated based on historical fluctuations in the price of individual securities and on the correlation in price changes between individual securities

28. Division of responsibilities 29. Petroleum Fund - Division of responsibilities

  • Owner: Ministry of Finance
    • Strategic asset allocation and investment universe
    • Benchmarks
    • Risk limits
    • Evaluates manager (uses consultant)
    • Reports to Stortinget
  • Manager: Norges Bank
    • Achieve as high return as possible given investment mandate and restrictions
    • Risk control
    • Reports to MOF

Adviser: Norges Bank 30. Properties of the fund management model

  • Accountability
  • Transparency
  • Focus on the contribution to value added in the operational management

31. Organisation withinNorgesBank

  • NorgesBank Investment Management (NBIM) was established as a separate investment management unit in 1998 - with Chinese