Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

17
Slide Show #12 Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    214
  • download

    1

Transcript of Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

Page 1: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

Slide Show #12Slide Show #12AGEC 430

Macroeconomics of Agriculture

Spring 2010

Page 2: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

Handout #22Handout #22

Page 3: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.
Page 4: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

Desired capital stock concept discussed in Handout #6 (Slide Show #5).

Desired capital stock concept discussed in Handout #6 (Slide Show #5).

Page 5: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

Remember this ratio represents the ratio of MVP to MIC.

Remember this ratio represents the ratio of MVP to MIC.

Page 6: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

Recall that IT is included in the investment component of GDP.

Recall that IT is included in the investment component of GDP.

Page 7: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.
Page 8: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

This regression takes the form: NIT = b0 + b1(Year).You know from AGEC 317 that an R2 of 0.002 is an extremely poor explanation of net investment expenditures.

This regression takes the form: NIT = b0 + b1(Year).You know from AGEC 317 that an R2 of 0.002 is an extremely poor explanation of net investment expenditures.

Page 9: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

This is verified by an examination of the linear trend projected by the estimated equation, which is declining very slightly.

This is verified by an examination of the linear trend projected by the estimated equation, which is declining very slightly.

Page 10: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

The estimation of the second equation incorporating the ratio of the expectedMVP to MIC does a much better job of explaining the annual fluctuations in net investment in farm tractors as evidenced by the R2 of 0.730.

The estimation of the second equation incorporating the ratio of the expectedMVP to MIC does a much better job of explaining the annual fluctuations in net investment in farm tractors as evidenced by the R2 of 0.730.

Page 11: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

This is verified by an examination of the annual fluctuations of net investment in farm tractors projected by the second estimated equation.

This is verified by an examination of the annual fluctuations of net investment in farm tractors projected by the second estimated equation.

Page 12: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.
Page 13: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.
Page 14: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

Thus net investment in farm tractors was expected to be $9.45 billion, but there is a 70 percent chance that it could be as high as $9.97 billion and as low as $8.93 billion.

Thus net investment in farm tractors was expected to be $9.45 billion, but there is a 70 percent chance that it could be as high as $9.97 billion and as low as $8.93 billion.

Known as a triangularprobability distribution

Known as a triangularprobability distribution

Probability

$8.93 $9.45 $9.97

Page 15: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

How would a manufacturer How would a manufacturer use this projection?use this projection?Indicates industry demand.Each manufacturer like John Deere would

want to maintain its market share.Given its market share, does it have

sufficient capacity to meet this demand?If not, does it make economic sense to

expand its manufacturing capacity?

Page 16: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

Assume total industry sales last year was $9 billion and that total industry sales fare expected to be $9.45 billion this year. Let the red circle represent $9 billion and the blue circle is $9.45 billion. Assume there are four firms supplying farm machinery. Firm #1 had area ABC of the original “pie”. To keep its share of the pie, it must expand supply to ADE.

Assume total industry sales last year was $9 billion and that total industry sales fare expected to be $9.45 billion this year. Let the red circle represent $9 billion and the blue circle is $9.45 billion. Assume there are four firms supplying farm machinery. Firm #1 had area ABC of the original “pie”. To keep its share of the pie, it must expand supply to ADE.

A

B

C

D

E

Firm #1

Firm #2Firm #3

Firm #4

Page 17: Slide Show #12 AGEC 430 Macroeconomics of Agriculture Spring 2010.

The question Firm #1 must ask itself is does it have the manufacturing capacity to meet the sales suggested by area ADE. If not, it must determine whether or not expansion is economically feasible. We will examine a process to address this issue in Handout #24.

The question Firm #1 must ask itself is does it have the manufacturing capacity to meet the sales suggested by area ADE. If not, it must determine whether or not expansion is economically feasible. We will examine a process to address this issue in Handout #24.

A

B

C

D

E

Firm #1

Firm #2Firm #3

Firm #4