Skill Utilization for Sustainable Economies: The Illusion of an ......Sources: NALL 1998 Survey;...
Transcript of Skill Utilization for Sustainable Economies: The Illusion of an ......Sources: NALL 1998 Survey;...
Skill Utilization for Sustainable Economies: The Illusion of an
Optimal Skills Mix
Keynote Address to International Conference on “The Optimal Skill Mix for a Modern Economy”,
Marbach Castle, Lake Constance, Germany, September 12, 2013
D. W. LIVINGSTONE
Canada Research Chair in Lifelong Learning and Work and Professor Emeritus
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto
Basic Challenges in Assessing Skill Use
• Acceptable definition of skill
• Agreement on appropriate use
• Willful suspension of disbelief
Theoretical Perspective on Skill Use
• Inter-firm competition, conflicts between employers and employees over working conditions, and technological innovation all provoke incessant shifts in the number of enterprises, employees, and types of jobs available.
• Technological innovation and workers’ learning on the job increase efficiency, modifying the overall demand for labour.
• Popular demand for general education and specialized training increases cumulatively as people seek more knowledge, skills, credentials, to live and qualify for jobs.
• Dominant tendency: supply of qualified job seekers exceeds demand for most jobs-- a reserve army of labour. An optimal skill mix is therefore illusory at best under prevailing economic and social conditions.
Introduction …
• Continual development of workers’ knowledge is required for profit maximization...
BUT
• Recognition and reward of this knowledge must be seriously limited in order for capitalist owners to realize profits against each other.
Knowledge Economy
“... one in which the generation and exploitation of knowledge has come to play the predominant part in the creation of wealth. It is not simply about pushing back the frontiers of knowledge; it is also about the most effective use and exploitation of all types of knowledge in all manner of economic activity”
(U.K. Dept. of Trade and Industry, Competitiveness White Paper 1998)
Knowledge Society
“A Knowledge Society is one that creates, shares, and uses knowledge for the prosperity and well-being of its people.”
Yahoo answers, May, 2011.
Introduction
• “knowledge-economy” in which human capital is developed/applied for profitable economic growth and exploitation...
Versus
• “knowledge society” in which popular demand for growing sources of information is increasingly difficult to harness within the existing relations of production.
Basic Contradiction
• development of forces of knowledge production (expressed by the explosive growth of the Internet)
• concentration of ownership of private enterprises (indicated by the concentration of control within global transnational corporations)
16 36
70 147
248
361
513 587
719
817
1,018 1,093
1,319
1,574
1,802
1,971
2,267
2,405
[VALUE]
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Global Internet Users 1995 to 2013 and Global Concentration of Corporate Power 2011
Source: www.internetworldstats.com, 2013 Source: Vitali, S., Glattfelder, J., & Battiston, S. (2011).
The network of global corporate control. PloS one, 6(10).
Superconnected company Very connected company Size of circle represents revenue
The Global 0.001%
Source: www.internetworldstats.com, 2013
Wealth Concentration in the US Since 1913 Top .01% of Population Income Share
“There has been class warfare going on for the last 20 years and my class has won.”
Warren Buffet, Chairman and CEO, Berkshire Hathaway
“The internet, our greatest tool of emancipation, has been transformed into the most dangerous facilitator of totalitarianism we have ever seen– [supranational and dominated by global corporate power].”
Julian Assange
Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet.
New York: OR Books, 2012.
The Global 0.001%
Source: www.internetworldstats.com, 2013
Outline of Main Presentation
1. CONCEPTUAL DIMENSIONS OF USE OF WORKERS’ LABOUR TIME AND SKILLS
2. EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS
3. LEARNING CONDITIONS
4. ASSESSING LEARNING-WORK RELATIONS, SKILL USE/ UNDEREMPLOYMENT
5. ALTERNATIVES
General Forms of Activity and Learning
Forms of Activity
•Paid Employment
•Unpaid Housework
•Community Volunteer Work
•Leisure (sleep, self-care, hobbies)
Forms of Learning
•Formal Schooling
•Further Education
•Informal Education
•Self-directed Learning
Source: Livingstone, 2010.
Changing Nature of Work and Lifelong Learning http://wall.oise.utoronto.ca
• Changing Nature of Work and Lifelong Learning Research Network (www.wallnetwork.ca)
• Research funded by SSHRC under a series of Strategic Research Grants and the Canada Research Chairs Program
• Includes 1998, 2004 and 2010 representative national surveys of randomly selected respondents over 18 on many issues of working conditions and adult learning
• Also includes over 50 related case studies of different industry sectors, at-risk workers, unpaid work and informal learning
Inclusive Work and Learning Profiles
• These national surveys of work and lifelong learning (WALL) in 1998, 2004 and 2010 are the first anywhere to estimate the incidence of both paid and unpaid work in relation to both formal and informal learning. A rich array of workers’ formal and informal learning efforts has been found.
• Several gaps between workers’ knowledge and job requirements are documented from the WALL surveys and related case studies.
Forms of Underemployment
Forms of
Underemployment
Characteristics of Specific Forms of
Underemployment
Time-based Unemployment (actively looking,
discouraged workers)
Involuntary Temporary Employment
(part-time, limited contract)
Knowledge-
based
Credential Gap
Performance Gap
Relevance Gap
Knowledge Gap
Subjective Personal Estimate of Match between
Qualifications and Job Requirements
Section 2 Employment Conditions
MAIN FINDINGS OF RECENT WORK AND LEARNING SURVEYS IN CANADA
2. EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS
• DECLINING WORKING CLASS AND WORKING CLASS IDENTITY, GROWING PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEE CLASS
• PRECARIOUS WORK AND “JOB CHURNING” ARE INCREASING
• COMPUTER USE IS NEARING UNIVERSALITY
• MAJORITY OF LABOUR FORCE NOW REQUIRE POST-SECONDARY CREDENTIAL TO GET JOB
• GENERAL PERCEIVED INCREASES SINCE THE 1980’S IN JOB DESIGN AND ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION-MAKING ROLES AMONG LOWER LEVEL (SERVICE AND INDUSTRIAL) WORKERS. LITTLE CHANGE FOR PROFESSIONAL AND MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES
Class Structure of the Employed Labour Force Canada, 1982-2010 (%)
Sources: 1982: CCS Survey(N=1,758); 1998: NALL Survey (N=873); 2004:WALL I Survey (N=5,570); 2010: WALL II Survey (N=1,192).
Employment Class 1982 1998 2004 2010
Large employers <1 <1 <1 <1
Small employers 2 3 4 4
Self-employed 13 9 13 12
Managers 4 8 11 12
Supervisors 4 5 6 5
Professional employees 14 18 20 25
Service workers 33 26 22 23
Industrial workers 30 27 23 18
Main Changes in Class Structure Canada, 1982-2010 (%)
Sources: 1982: CCS Survey(N=1,758); 1998: NALL Survey (N=873); 2004:WALL I Survey (N=5,570); 2010: WALL II Survey (N=1,192).
4 14 33 30 8 18 26 27 11 20 22 23 12 25 23 18 0
10
20
30
40
Managers Professional employees Service workers Industrial workers
1982 1998 2004 2010
Participation in Paid and Unpaid Work All Adults, 2010 (%)
[ Sources: WALL, 2010.]
98
79
70
46
64
2
21
30
54
36
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Household work
Any volunteer work
Informal volunteer work
Formal volunteer work
Employed labour force
Participants Non-participants
Percentage of Employed Labour Force in Precarious Jobs 2004-2010 (%)
13 13 12 29 16 15 11 33 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Part-time Temporary or seasonal Self-employed Total Precarious
WALL, 2004 WALL, 2010
Sources: WALL 2004 survey (N=5733); WALL 2010 survey (N=1239).
Organizational Changes in Past 5 Years Employed labour force, 2004 -2010
23
30
39
50
56
23
33
39
39
42
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Reduction in managers/supervisors
Increase in overtime
Part-time or temporary workers
More job rotation/multi-skilling
Reduction in number of employees
2004 (%) 2010 (%)
Sources: WALL 2004 survey (N=5581); WALL 2010 survey (N=1256).
Computer Use in Canada Employed Labour Force, 1989–2010 (% using on job or at home)
Sources: Statistics Canada 1989, 1994, 2000; WALL 2004 survey, WALL 2010 survey.
38
51
77
85
95
0
20
40
60
80
100
1989 1994 2000 2004 2010*
Design Work “All or Most of the Time” All Wage and Salary Earners, 1982-2010 (%)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1,482); WALL 2004 Survey (N=4,249); WALL 2010 Survey (N=967).
43 56 61 0
25
50
75
100
1982 2004 2010
Design Work “All or Most of the Time” by Employee Class Position, 1982-2010 (%)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1,482); WALL 2004 Survey (N=4,249); WALL 2010 Survey (N=967).
85 80 84 32 29 69 71 68 47 48 73 62 71 49 47 0
25
50
75
100
Managers Supervisors Professional employees
Service workers Industrial workers
1982 2004 2010
Self-Reported Managerial or Supervisory Role All Wage and Salary Earners, 1982-2010 (%)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1,482); WALL 2004 Survey (N=4,249); WALL 2010 Survey (N=967).
23 39 50 0
25
50
75
100
1982 2004 2010
Self-Reported Managerial or Supervisory Role by Employee Class, 1982-2010 (%)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1,482); WALL 2004 Survey (N=4,249); WALL 2010 Survey (N=967).
83 88 31 16 9 74 81 35 29 27 79 76 52 40 38 0
25
50
75
100
Managers Supervisors Professional employees
Service workers Industrial workers
1982 2004 2010
Required Educational Entry Credential Employed Labour Force, 1982-2010
Sources: CCS Survey, 1982; WALL 2004 Survey ; WALL 2010 Survey.
39 33 13 15 23 32 24 21 21 28 24 27 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
No diploma High school diploma College certificate University degree
1982 2004 2010
Post-secondary Credential Required for Job Entry All Wage and Salary Earners, 1982-2010
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1462); WALL 2004 Survey(N=3887); WALL 2010 Survey (N= 933).
28 45 53 0
25
50
75
1982 2004 2010
Post-Sec Credential Required for Entry to Job
Post-secondary Credential Required by Employee Class 1982-2010 (% Requiring Post-secondary Credential)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1,482); WALL 2004 Survey (N=4,249).; WALL 2010 Survey (N=967).
75 39 87 16 10 67 31 81 35 20 61 44 89 38 25 0
25
50
75
100
Managers Supervisors Professional employees
Service workers Industrial workers
Section 3 Learning Conditions
3. LEARNING CONDITIONS
• HIGHEST INCIDENCE OF POST-SECONDARY COMPLETION IN WORLD (UNIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE COMBINED).
• FURTHER EDUCATION COURSE PARTICIPATION HAS INCREASED IN CONJUNCTION WITH INCREASING POST-SECONDARY COMPLETION
• VERY EXTENSIVE JOB-RELATED AND GENERAL INFORMAL “ICEBERG” OF LEARNING
• FORMAL SCHOOLING AND FURTHER ADULT EDUCATION COURSE PARTICIPATION ARE QUITE CLOSELY RELATED, BUT INCIDENCE OF INTENTIONAL INFORMAL LEARNING IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY RELATED TO EITHER
• ADULT AGE GROUPS VARY GREATLY IN FURTHER EDUCATION COURSE PARTICIPATION, VERY LITTLE IN (HIGH) INCIDENCE OF INTENTIONAL INFORMAL LEARNING
• EMPLOYMENT CLASSES VARY GREATLY IN FORMAL SCHOOLING, LESS SO IN FURTHER EDUCATION PARTICIPATION, VERY LITTLE IN INCIDENCE OF INFORMAL LEARNING
MAIN FINDINGS OF RECENT WORK AND LEARNING SURVEYS IN CANADA
Post-secondary Educational Attainment All Wage and Salary Earners, 1982-2010 (% completed)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1462); WALL 2004 Survey(N=3887); WALL 2010 Survey (N= 933).
25 56 64 0
25
50
75
1982 2004 2010
Post-Sec Completed
Post-secondary Educational Attainment by Employee Class 1982-2010 (% completed)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1,482); WALL 2004 Survey (N=4,249).; WALL 2010 Survey (N=967).
41 23 85 16 12 72 56 83 50 34 67 46 91 56 39 0
25
50
75
100
Managers Supervisors Professional employees
Service workers Industrial workers
1982 2004 2010
Post-secondary Educational Attainment and Participation in Further Education, Employed Labour Force, 1982-2010
22 49 56 61 24 49 55 54 0
20
40
60
80
1983 1998 2004 2010
Post-secondary completion Further education
Sources: NALL 1998 Survey; WALL 2004 Survey; WALL2010 Survey.
Level of Schooling and Participation in Further Education, Employed Labour Force, 1998-2010 (% participating)
Sources: NALL 1998 Survey; WALL 2004 Survey; WALL 2010 Survey.
26 46 63 69 34 51 59 65 38 47 59 65 0
25
50
75
No diploma High school diploma College certificate University degree
1998 2004 2010
Self-reported On-the-Job Training Time Required to Perform Job All Employees, 1982-2010 (%)
Sources: CCS Survey, 1982; WALL 2004 Survey; WALL 2010 Survey.
25 17 15 8 10 13 12 14 15 14 8 7 21 21 15 14 14 7 8 21 21 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Few days or less
A week to a month
1 to 3 months
3 to 6 months
6 to 12 months
1 to 3 years 3 years or more
1982 2004 2010
Participation Rate in All Types of Informal Learning 1998–2010 (%)
[ Sources: NALL 1998 Survey; WALL 2004 Survey; WALL 2010 Survey. ]
92 91 95
0
20
40
60
80
100
1998 2004 2010
%
Participation Rates in Paid and Unpaid Work and Informal Learning, 2010 (%)
Sources: WALL 2010 Survey.
64
79
98
58
71
80
0
25
50
75
100
Paid work Volunteer work Household work
Participation in this form of work % of all adults
Time of Participation in Different Forms of Informal Learning* 1998-2010 (hours per week)
7 6 4 6 15 5 6 4 5 14 6 4 6 6 15 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Job Housework Volunteer work General interest Total
NALL, 1998 WALL, 2004 WALL, 2010
Sources: NALL 1998 Survey; WALL 2004 Survey; WALL 2010 Survey. * Participants only
Topics of Job-Related Informal Learning Employed Labour Force 1998-2010 (% engaged)
42
46
49
62
42
54
58
64
42
43
58
56
55
56
55
62
38
43
52
55
61
63
63
71
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Organisational or Managerial Skills
Employment Conditions
New Equipment
Health and Safety
Computers
New Job Tasks
Teamwork, Problem Solving,
New General Knowledge
NALL, 1998 [%] WALL, 2004 [%] WALL, 2010 [%]
Sources: NALL 1998 Survey; WALL 2004 Survey; WALL 2010 Survey.
Age and Participation in Further Education Course and Any Informal Learning Activities, All Respondents, 2010
Source: WALL 2010 Survey (N=1965).
0
20
40
60
80
100
18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+
Taken a course in past year Any informal learning
Section 4 Learning-Work Relations
4. LEARNING-WORK RELATIONS, SKILL USE
• LOWER FORMAL SCHOOLING, HIGHER UNEMPLOYMENT
• FORMAL EDUCATION ATTAINMENTS HAVE BEEN INCREASING FASTER THAN FORMAL JOB ENTRY REQUIREMENTS, HENCE INCREASING UNDEREMPLOYMENT OF CREDENTIALS
• INCREASING UNDEREMPLOYMENT ON SEVERAL FORMS OF UNDEREMPLOYMENT
• INCREASING UNDEREMPLOYMENT ACROSS ALL EMPLOYEE CLASSES. HIGHEST UNDEREMPLOYMENT AMONG SERVICE AND INDUSTRIAL WORKERS
• IN SPITE OF RAPID INCREASE IN COMPUTER USE, WORKERS’ COMPUTER LITERACY STILL EXCEEDS JOB REQUIREMENTS
MAIN FINDINGS OF RECENT WORK AND LEARNING SURVEYS IN CANADA
Forms of Underemployment
Forms of
Underemployment
Characteristics of Specific Forms of
Underemployment
Time-based Unemployment (actively looking,
discouraged workers)
Involuntary Temporary Employment
(part-time, limited contract)
Knowledge-based Credential Gap
Performance Gap
Relevance Gap
Knowledge Gap
Subjective Personal Estimate of Match between
Qualifications and Job Requirements Sources: Livingstone, 2009.
Educational Requirements for Job Entry and Formal Educational Attainments Wage and Salary Earners, 1982-2010 (% Post-secondary Credential)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982 (N=1462); WALL 2004 Survey(N=3887); WALL 2010 Survey (N= 933).
28 45 53 25 56 64 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1982 2004 2010
Post-Sec Credential Required Post-Sec Credential Completed
Educational Attainment and Official Unemployment Rates 2004-2010* (%)
Sources: WALL 2004 Survey; WALL 2010 Survey.
* % of 25-64 years old adults , non full-time students, actively looking for jobs.
** Insufficient number for reliability.
13 6 5 2 3 8 4 4 4 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
No diploma HS diploma College certificate University degree Prof grad degree
Unemployed, 2004 Unemployed, 2010
**
Educational attainment and part-time or seasonal employment Employed Labour Force, 2004-2010 (%)
Sources: WALL 2010 Survey. *Currently employed, 25-64 years old, non full-time students, actively looking.
18 14 10 11 12 35 13 14 9 8 0
10
20
30
40
No diploma HS diploma College certificate Bach degree Prof / grad degree
2004 2010
Official Unemployment Rate Canada, 1970-2013 (% of the Labour Force)
Source: Statistics Canada
Unemployment Rate*, European Union and Canada 4th quarter 2012 (%)
*ILO definition, permanent resident population
Sources: The Swiss Labour Force Survey , 2013
Canada Labour Force Survey, 2013 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Norway Switzerland
Austria Iceland
Germany Luxembourg Netherlands
Malta Romania Denmark
Finland Czech Republic
United Kingdom Sweden Canada
Belgium Estonia
Slovenia Poland
Hungary France EU-27
Italy Euro zone (EZ17)
Bulgaria Cyprus
Lithuania Latvia
Ireland Slovakia Portugal
Spain Greece
Country
p/t employed as % of total
employed
% of p/t employed wishing
more hours
p/t wish more as % total
employed
EU27 19.9 21.4 4.3
EA17 21.4 20.4 4.4
Netherlands 49.8 3.3 1.6
Switzerland 35.6 16.9 6.0
Norway 28.1 11.1 3.1
United Kingdom 27.0 24.1 6.5
Germany 26.5 17.1 4.5
Sweden 26.5 19.3 5.1
Denmark 25.7 12.7 3.3
Austria 25.5 13.7 3.5
Belgium 25.0 14.0 3.5
Ireland 23.9 33.6 8.0
Luxembourg 18.9 11.7 2.2
France** 18.0 24.7 4.4
Italy 17.0 15.6 2.6
Canada 15.6 36.5 5.7
Finland 15.1 20.1 3.0
Spain 14.7 54.5 8.0
Malta 13.9 21.3 3.0
Portugal 13.2 42.8 5.6
Turkey 11.9 11.6 1.4
Cyprus 10.5 50.4 5.3
Romania 10.2 25.3 2.6
Slovenia 9.5 20.6 2.0
Lithuania 9.3 30.8 2.9
Poland 7.8 28.5 2.2
Croatia 7.8 26.9 2.1
Greece 7.7 66.0 5.1
Hungary 7.0 31.8 2.2
FYR Macedonia 6.4 33.6 2.2
Czech Republic 5.7 9.6 0.5
Slovakia 4.1 38.0 1.6
Bulgaria 2.4 38.8 0.9
Part-time Work and Involuntary P/T European Union and Canada, 2012 Persons aged 15 to 74 working part-time,
wishing and being available to work more hours
Sources:
European Labour Force Survey 2012;
Canada WALL Survey 2010;
**excluding overseas departments
Part-time Work European Union and Canada, 2012
Sources: European Labour Force Survey 2012; Canada WALL Survey 2010 **excluding overseas departments
2.4 4.1 5.7 6.4 7 7.7 7.8 7.8 9.3 9.4 9.5 10.2 10.4 10.5 11.9 13.2 13.9 14.7 15.1 15.6 17 18 18.9 23.9 25 25.5 25.7 26.5 26.5 27 28.1 35.6 49.8
19.9 21.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
Bulgaria Slovakia
Czech Republic FYR Macedonia
Hungary Greece Croatia Poland
Lithuania Latvia
Slovenia Romania
Estonia Cyprus Turkey
Portugal Malta Spain
Finland Canada (2010)
Italy France**
Luxembourg Ireland
Belgium Austria
Denmark Sweden
Germany United Kingdom
Norway Switzerland
Netherlands
EU27 EA17
Involuntary Part-time Work European Union and Canada, 2012 (%)
Sources: European Labour Force Survey 2012; Canada WALL Survey 2010 **excluding overseas departments
0.5 0.9 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.7 2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.9 3 3 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.5 4.4 4.5 5 5.1 5.1 5.3 5.6 5.7 6 6.5 8 8
4.3 4.4
0 2 4 6 8 10
Czech Republic Bulgaria
Turkey Slovakia
Netherlands Estonia
Slovenia Croatia
FYR Macedonia Hungary
Poland Luxembourg
Romania Italy
Lithuania Malta
Finland Norway
Denmark Belgium Austria France
Germany Latvia
Greece Sweden Cyprus
Portugal Canada (2010)
Switzerland United Kingdom
Spain Ireland
EU27 EA17
Estimated Skill Underemployment* European Union and Canada, 2010 (%)
17
21
22
23
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
28
29
30
30
30
32
32
32
33
34
37
37
38
39
40
40
41
41
42
44
47
51
52
59
60
61
63
63
68
60
53
60
51
62
62
65
64
61
54
52
60
62
56
56
55
53
53
47
55
47
53
48
51
48
51
47
45
39
40
25
19
17
13
13
8
15
22
14
23
12
10
8
8
10
16
18
10
7
12
12
12
13
10
16
7
14
8
12
9
11
7
9
8
10
8
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Austria Lithuania
Czech Republic Kosovo Finland
Portugal Denmark
Estonia Poland
Germany Norway
Italy Turkey
Bulgaria Belgium
Luxembourg Slovakia
France FYROM
EU Netherlands
Malta Sweden
Spain Hungary
Ireland Latvia
United Kingdom Slovenia
Croatia Albania
Montenegro Cyprus Greece
CANADA Romania
Overqualified Match Underqualified
*Which of the following alternatives would best describe your skills in your own work? • 1 I need further training to cope well with my duties (underqualified) • 2 My present skills correspond well with my duties (match) • 3 I have the skills to cope with more demanding duties (overqualified) Sources: EWCS, 2010; WALL, 2010
Summary of Skill-based Underemployment Canada, 1998-2010 (%)
30 29 20 47 34 32 28 52 32 29 29 53 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Credential Performance Subjective Any Skill-based
1998 2004 2010
Subjective Match between Qualifications and Job Requirements
Wage and Salary Earners, 1998-2010 (%)
Sources: NALL 1998 Survey (N=747); WALL 2004 Survey (N=4179); WALL 2010 Survey (N=966).
22
27
30
74
67
65
4
6
5
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1998
2004
2010
Under-employed Match Under-qualified
Credential Underemployment 1982-2010 (% underemployed)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982; WALL 2004 Survey; WALL 2010 Survey
25 31 31 0
25
50
75
100
1982 2004 2010
Credential Underemployment by Employee Class 1982-2010 (% underemployed)
Sources: Canadian Class Structure Survey, 1982; WALL 2004 Survey; WALL 2010 Survey
15 21 17 25 33 29 24 20 39 36 0
10
20
30
40
50
Managers Supervisors Professional employees
Service workers Industrial workers
1982 2010
Selected Employee Classes and Employment Experience by Credential Underemployment
2010 (% underemployed)
Source: WALL, 2010.
30
43
12
28
0 10 20 30 40 50
10+ years
< 10 years
10+ years
< 10 years
Professional employees
Industrial and service workers
Sources: WALL 2010 Survey (N=986).
Knowledge Gap Wage and Salary Earners, 2010 (% re job requirements)
63
34
4
0
25
50
75
100
More About the same Less
51 43
6
0
20
40
60
80
100
Higher Same Lower
Sources: WALL 2010 Survey (N=680).
Computer Skills Match All Wage and Salary Earners, 2010
57 52 52 49 44 40 46 39 48 46 4 3
9 3
10
0
25
50
75
100
Managers Supervisors Professional employees
Service workers Industrial workers
Higher Same Lower
Sources: WALL 2010 Survey (N=680).
Computer Skills Match by Employee Class Canada, 2010
Sources: WALL 2004 Survey (N=967); WALL 2010 Survey (N=901).
Computer Skills Match With Requirements of Job by Age Group Employed Labour Force, 2004-2010, (% overqualified)
70 59 54 38 37 75 56 57 42 33 0
25
50
75
100
18–24 25–34 35–44 45–54 55–64
2004 (%) 2010 (%)
Case Study Findings on Education-Job Match
These diverse case studies (documented in Livingstone 2009, 2010) allow the following conclusions:
• Most participants were engaged in extensive intentional learning activities, with various degrees of relevance to their jobs. All participants were to greater or lesser degrees engaged in problem-solving during which they continuously acquired and reformulated their cognitive knowledge and abilities, and utilised them to “micro-modify” their jobs.
• However, while many workers exercised some discretion in performing their jobs, they also reported restricted opportunities to use their abilities in the design of their jobs and in organisational decision-making. This limitation applied especially to service workers and industrial workers (as exemplified by clerical and auto workers) as well as to disabled workers.
Case Study Findings on Education-Job Match
“Just involve the people … This guy might run this machine every day for years. He will come up with ideas that will make his job easier for him and easier for management … Give people some sort of a sense of importance … rather than being treated like cattle.”
(Ethan, a tool setter on an auto assembly line)
(Source: Education and Jobs 2009)
Selected Quote
5. Alternatives
Possibilities
5. ALTERNATIVES
• BASIC PRINCIPLES
• SHAREHOLDER CAPITALISM OR STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM OR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY MODELS
• JOB DESIGN OPTIONS/EDUCATION AND TRAINING OPTIONS
• POLICY ACTORS AND POLITICAL WILL
Education Reforms vs. Economic Reforms
• IN LIGHT OF THE EMPLOYED LABOUR FORCES’ HIGH LEVEL OF FORMAL SCHOOLING, FURTHER EDUCATION, EXTENSIVE INFORMAL LEARNING ON THE JOB AND CHRONIC UNDEREMPLOYMENT, ECONOMIC REFORMS, ESPECIALLY ENRICHED JOBS, MAY BE MORE PERTINENT THAN TRAINING REFORMS TO ADDRESS GAPS BETWEEN WORKERS’ KNOWLEGE AND JOB REQUIREMENTS
Several general normative principles essential for developing feasible organisational alternatives for sustainable productive work compatible with enhancing human abilities:
– productive activities reconciled with the needs to support future generations without compromising the ecosystem;
– the right to a decent job, that is, to make a living through work that permits a full use of human capabilities in dignity and security;
– participatory democracy, that is, decisions should involve all who are engaged in production; and
– equitable opportunities for those from all social backgrounds (economic class of origin, age, gender, race or with a disability) to use their abilities.
Principles for Economic Alternatives
[ 19 ]
Shareholder Capitalism
Stakeholder Capitalism
Economic Democracy
Ownership People’s
Capitalism Profit
sharing Socialized
Market
Labour Process
Re- engineering
Co-determination
Self-Management
Work Redistribution
Flexible labour force
Reduced Workweek
Full Employment
New Forms of work
Workfare Guaranteed
Income Green work
[ Source: Livingstone, 2004 ]
Macro-Economic Alternatives
• Stronger employment standards with higher minimum wage and living wage provisions.
• Enable organizing efforts among workers and communities to negotiate decent working conditions, job upgrading and transitions.
Generic Good Jobs Policy Reforms
Job Design • Paid Work Redistribution
(less 50+ hour jobs, more hours and benefits for <30 hour jobs)
• Real Democratized Technical Design and Social Authority (participatory design, co-determined decision-making)
• Flex-time Scheduling Responsive to Work-Life Balance Issues, (based partly on recognition of unpaid work (housework, community volunteer work) responsibilities, and further redistribution of female and male responsibility for them)
• New Forms of Socially Useful Paid Employment (new sustainable [green, renewable] products, renewed infrastructure, environmental clean-up) Education and Training
• Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR) (portfolio development, demonstration, challenge exams, case studies, presentations)
• More Co-ordinated Mentoring by Senior Workers (including those phasing into retirement)
Specific Current Job Design and Training Options
Class Position and Class Identity Employed Labour Force, 1982-2010 (% working class identity)
Employment Class 1982 1998 2004 2010
Large employers 0 5 5 0
Small employers 12 25 18 8
Self-employed 29 40 34 19
Managers 13 16 18 8
Supervisors 26 16 36 21
Professional employees 13 12 23 7
Service workers 33 29 39 23
Industrial workers 51 31 42 29
Total labour force 32 25 32 17 Sources: 1982: CCS Survey (N=1,482); 2004:WALL I Survey (N=4,249); 2010: WALL II Survey (N=967).
Declining Working Class Identity in Working Class Positions, Canada 1982-2010 (%)
33 51 29 31 39 42 23 29 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Service workers Industrial workers
1982 1998 2004 2010
Sources: 1982: CCS Survey (N=1,482); 2004:WALL I Survey (N=4,249); 2010: WALL II Survey (N=967).
Class Position and Opposition to “Scabs” Employed Labour Force, 1982-2010 (% opposed)
Sources: 1982: CCS Survey (N=1,714); 2004:WALL I Survey (N=2,713); 2010: WALL II Survey (N=1,198).
Employment Class 1982 2004 2010
Large employers 45 19 0
Small employers 24 28 46
Self-employed 41 45 55
Managers 44 48 42
Supervisors 56 59 61
Professional employees 67 58 64
Service workers 65 58 49
Industrial workers 72 62 57
Total labour force 62 54 54
Industrial Workers’ Opposition to “Scabs” 1982-2010
Sources: 1982: CCS Survey (N=1,714); 2004:WALL I Survey (N=2,713); 2010: WALL II Survey (N=1,198).
72 62 57 0
20
40
60
80
100
1982 2004 2010
Industrial workers
Class Position by View that Corporations Benefit Owners at the Expense of Workers and Consumers
Canada, 1982-2010 (% agree)
1982 2004 2010
Large Employers N/A* 42 N/A*
Small Employers N/A* 49 N/A*
Self-Employed 68 72 68
Managers 43 60 58
Supervisors 65 67 60
Professionals 66 71 69
Service workers 69 72 64
Industrial workers 76 73 68
Totals 67 69 65 Sources: 1982: CCS Survey(N=1,758); 2004: WALL I Survey (N=5,570); 2010: WALL II Survey (N=1,192). * too few responses for reliable estimates
• The most sustained period of economic growth in the history of capitalism, with significant gains by working class people in wages and benefits, educational attainments and general living conditions has been followed by further gains in educational attainment coupled with stagnant wages and underemployment.
• A prominent political scientist has observed: “a very effective way of enhancing the sense of injustice of the victimized is to increase their education and little else”.
Morton Deutsch. “A Framework for Thinking about Oppression and Its Change”. Social Justice Research, 19(1), 7–41 (p. 26).
Factors Related to Subjective Underemployment Employed Labour Force, Canada, 2004
Source: WALL 2004 Survey
Adjusted odds
ratio
Sign.
CLASS POSITION
1 large employer 1 .000
2 small employer 5.682 .001
3 self-employed 5.639 .001
4 manager 2.558 .076
5 supervisor 5.378 .002
6 professional employee 2.797 .050
7 service worker 6.553 .000
8 industrial worker 6.276 .000
ORG. DECISION-
MAKING
1 Self decisions 1 .119
2 Advice-approval 1.033 .740
3 No role 1.171 .052
UNION OR
ASSOCIATION
MEMBERSHIP
5 Non-member 1 .861
1 Union .973 .727
3 Association 1.033 .746
AGE 5 60+ .000
18 -29 2.579 .000
2 30-39 1.549 .021
3 40-49 1.464 .044
4 50-59 1.350 .125
EDUCATIONAL
ATTAINMENT
1 LT High School 1 .000
2 HS diploma 2.035 .000
3 CC complete 2.062 .000
4 Univ complete 3.360 .000
5 Grad prof degree 3.375 .000
IMMIGRANT STATUS
1 Canadian-born 1 .000
2 Established immigrant 1.398 .000
3 Recent immigrant (<5 yrs) 2.139 .000
Conclusions
• Educational systems should and likely will continue to try to improve the relevance of their programmes in response to growing economic and social demands.
• Professional training and development personnel should make it a high a priority to take steps to ascertain the current formal and informal skill and knowledge profiles of those they provide further formal training and development courses and programs, rather than presuming knowledge deficits.
Conclusions
• We are living, as we always have, in a “learning society”, a “knowledge society” with increasingly widely informed workers and citizens.
• The notion of a “knowledge-based economy” remains fragmentary as various forms of underemployment of knowledge proliferate while profits and wealth become increasingly concentrated. This condition is likely to persist until the underemployment and sheer waste of talents of so many are recognized and addressed.
•“We are not dealing with the mysteries of curing cancer.” (Osterman and Shulman Good Jobs America, 2011)
•We have a sufficiently clear diagnosis to proceed with a cure to serious underemployment through improving the quality of jobs—if we have the will.
Conclusions
• Livingstone, D.W. (Ed.). (2009). Education and Jobs: Exploring the Gaps. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Livingstone, D.W. (Ed.). (2010). Lifelong Learning in Paid and Unpaid Work: Survey and Case Study Findings. London: Routledge.
• Livingstone, D.W., & Raykov, M. (2010). WALL Papers: Resources from the SSHRC Collaborative Research Initiative on the Changing Nature of Work and Lifelong Learning in the New Economy. Toronto: Centre for the Study of Education and Work. (Available at www.wallnetwork.ca.)
• Livingstone, D. W.(2010) Job requirements and workers' learning: formal gaps, informal closure, systemic limits. Journal of Education and Work, 23(3), 207-231.
• Livingstone, D.W., and D. Guile (eds.). (2012). The Knowledge Economy and Lifelong Learning: A Critical Reader. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
• Livingstone, D.W. (2013). Skill Underutilization. in J. Buchanan, D. Finegold, K. Mayhew and C. Warhurst (editors). Oxford Handbook of Skills and Training.
References
Changing Nature of Work and Lifelong Learning http://wall.oise.utoronto.ca
• Changing Nature of Work and Lifelong Learning Research Network (www.wallnetwork.ca)
• Research funded by SSHRC under a series of Strategic Research Grants and the Canada Research Chairs Program
• Includes 1998, 2004 and 2010 representative national surveys of randomly selected respondents over 18 on many issues of working conditions and adult learning
• Also includes over 50 related case studies of different industry sectors, at-risk workers, unpaid work and informal learning
Contact Information
Dr. D.W. Livingstone
Canada Research Chair in Lifelong Learning and Work
Professor Emeritus, Department of Humanities, Social Science and Social Justice Education
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto
252 Bloor St. W. Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V6
Email: [email protected]
Phone/fax: 905 271-2755