Sizing of Safety Valves for Flashing Multiphase Flow – ISO ...€¦ · Mass flow rate through...
Transcript of Sizing of Safety Valves for Flashing Multiphase Flow – ISO ...€¦ · Mass flow rate through...
Sizing of Safety Valves for Flashing Multiphase Flow –ISO 4126 and state of knowledgeProf. Dr. Jürgen Schmidt, CSE-Institut (Pfinztal)
CSE-Institute – Competence Center for Process- and Plant Safety [email protected]
CENTER OF SAFETY EXELLENCE, JOSEF-FRAUNHOFER-STR 9, 76434 PFINZTAL WWW.CSE-INSTITUT.DE
Cyrogenic Safety – HSE Seminar, CERN, Geneva 2016
Sizing of Safety Devices
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL
youngmotivatedambitious
talentedintelligent
Workshop for safety valve performance tests
Classical Experiment (Test rig) Modern CFD calculation
?
2
CFD Simulation of High Pressure Safety Valves
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL
Challanges:
Real Gas Properties
Dynamic Spring / Mass System (moving grids)
Moving Critical Pressure Ratio
Nitrogen 400 bar
PhD Thesis Arend Beune,TU Eindhoven, NL, 2009
Analysis of high pressure safety valves
3
CFD Simulation of High Pressure Safety Valves
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL
Mach [-] Pressure [bar] Temperature [K]
Gehäuse
Entrance
Valvedisc
Nitrogen 400 bar
A. Beune, J. Kuerten, J. Schmidt: Num. calculation and experimental validation of safety valve flows at pressure up to 600 bar, AIChE J., 02/2011
4
1) Numerical simulation (e.g. CFX, Fluent …)Complex valve geometry (details of valve geometry necessary; moving system)3D choking phenomenon (changeable locations)Local properties lacking(phase distribution, momentum/heat/mass transfer
2) Simplified ModelingConsidering a safety valve as an ideal nozzle(frictionless flow / adiabatic system)⇒ all effects of property data / flashing catched !Correction by a discharge coefficient(contraction / redirection of flow, frictional effects, heat exchange)⇒ mainly geometrical effects
Sizing of Safety Devices - Basic Approaches
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL
Not yet an option for industrial purpose 1
23
Chokingarea
5
Mass flow rate through safety valve
Sizing equation:
Discharge coefficient to be determined experimentally by valve manufacturer
Critical flow in the narrowest cross section depending on inlet flow conditions
Sizing of Safety Valves - Fluiddynamic Basics
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL
, ,nozzlem SV d mQ K Q= ⋅
Discharge coefficient
pb
p0
Throat“th”T0
Qm,nozzle
Inlet“0”
Pressure
pth = pcrit
Nozzle length
6
Consider:(1) Phase change (HEM)(2) Real gas effects (EOS gas / liquid)(3) Boiling delay (empirical HNE-DS)(4) Slip (empirical)(5) Degassing (empirical)…
Numerical solution: dependent on EOS (SRK, RK, PR …)
Analytical solution:
Sizing Methods – Nozzle Mass Flow Rate
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL
0
**
1 p
th p
C v dv
η= −∫
Flow coefficient(dimensionless mass flow rate):
dimensionless specific volume of two-phase flow
0
0
( ) 1 1pv Nv p
ω
= − −
Omega Methods (API, ISO, HNE-CSE)N Non-equilibrium factor
Diener / Schmidt 1998 / 2001 / 2004
𝑣𝑣∗
7
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL
Compressibility coeffizient
Boiling delay faktor
Critical pressure drop
HNE-CSE (Homogeneous Non-Equilibrium Consistent set of Sizing Equations)
g l g l
v, 0
2
0 ,0 ,0 0 0 ,0 ,0
0 0
x v cp p T v vN
v v hω
∆
⋅ ⋅ ⋅ −= + ⋅ ⋅
g l0 l
v, 0
a
,0 ,0,0 0 0 2
( v v )N x cp p T ln
h∆ η
− = + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅
1
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )ηωηωηωωη −⋅⋅−⋅−+ 1 2 + 2+ 1 2 0 2222 ln =
( )( )2 ph
1ln 1 1C
1 1 1
ω ω ηη
ωη
⋅ − − −
= ⋅ − +
Dimensionlessmass flow rate
HNE-CSE method – Mass Flow Rate
Na
N
8
HNE-CSE Method – Graphical Solution
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL
J. Schmidt, " Sizing of nozzles, venturis, orifices, control and safety valves for initially subcooled gas/liquid two-phase flow – the HNE-DS method”, Forsch. Ingenieurwes. (2007) 71: 47–58
η
C
2.0=rp Water 73.0=sη
critC
1. 2. 3. 4.
critη
1.00
Analytical solutionof possiblecritη
0.000.75 0.50 0.25 0.000.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
9
Valve Sizing ISO 4126-10
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL 10
Fluid ConditionValve Inlet
Definition ofSizing CaseCauses for Pressure Deviation
Pressure Relief: Bottom/DomeLevel Swell (Foam / Viscosity)
Mass Flow Rateto be Discharged
Heat Input:Fire / External heating / Chem. ReactionReaction System:Tempered / hybrid / gassyMass Flow Quality at Valve InletEnergy to be Discharged
SizingSafety Valve
SafeValve Function
Valve with Bellow / Friction damperChattering / Futtering ?
SeeISO 4126-7Dichargeable
Valve Mass FluxCritical Mass Flow Rate
Safety Valve Installation in Practice
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL 11
Deviation of Valve Installations from Standard Requirements
ISO 4126-9„… total pressure drop to the valve inlet does not exceed 3 %of the set pressure”
15 % of SV installations not in accordance to the 3 % rule
> 3 % < 3 %
Evaluation of valve installations in industrial plants
Inlet Pressure Loss
80 372 SVs1 550 SVs2 4 000 SVs3 13 049 SVs4
1. Kumana, Z. & Aldeeb, A. Analysis of Pressure Relief System Deficiencies. in 17th Annual Int. Symp. October 28-30 157–165 (2014).2. SMITH, D., BURGESS, J. & POWERS, C. Relief device inlet piping : Beyond the 3 percent rule. Hydrocarb. Process. 59–66 (2011).3. Köper, O. & Westphal, F. Database-supported documentation and verification of pressure relief device design in chemical plants. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 16, 73–79 (2003).4. Berwanger, P. C., Kreder, R. A. & Lee, W.-S. Analysis identifies deficiencies in existing pressure relief systems. Process Saf. Prog. 19, 166–172 (2000).
15,6 % 18,0 %12,0 % 8,2 %
EuroValve (CSE)European Programon Evaluation of SafetyValve Stability (BASF, Bayer, …) Fluttering / Chattering
Development of Valve Stability Criteria(3% rule will exchanged)
SmOP (CSE)Smart OverpressureProtection Devices adapt Valve Openingon Process Conditions
Current Activities / Research Gaps
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL 12
> 10 HzDarby, R. & Aldeeb, A. A.: The dynamic response of pressure reliefvalves in vapor or gas service. Part III: Model validation.J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 31, 133–141 (2014).
CSE High Pressure Test Faciltiy
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL 13
Low PressureBuffer Vessel150 bar36 m / 24 m70 m3
High Pressure Tower700 bar / 3400 barBuffer Vessel
Installation QI/2017
CSE High Pressure Test Faciltiy
22.09.2016 PROF. DR. JÜRGEN SCHMIDT | CSE-INSTITUT, PFINZTAL 14
Stickstoffspeicher
Stickstoffpuffer
Wasserpuffer
Speisung 11 m
SV N 2
Feed line11 m
700 bar
700 bar
3.400 bar
Gas Buffer of 700 and 3400 bar Part
CSE-INSTITUT.DE
Research and Education in Process and Plant Safety