Six Sigma PTO

download Six Sigma PTO

of 41

Transcript of Six Sigma PTO

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    1/41

    WINTRODUCTION

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    2/41

    W SIGMA) ;

    jIS A LETTER IN THE GREEK ALPHABET

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    3/41

    W SIGMA) ;jIS A LETTER IN THE GREEK ALPHABET

    jIS A STATISTICAL MEASUREMENT UNIT

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    4/41

    WHAT DOES SIGMA LEVEL MEAN?

    Quality level of product

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    5/41

    WHAT DOES SIGMA LEVEL MEAN?

    Quality level of productProcess performance

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    6/41

    WHAT DOES SIGMA LEVEL MEAN?

    Quality level of productProcess performance

    Reliability for customer

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    7/41

    DPMO ;DPMO ;

    jMEANS DEFECTS PER MILLION

    OPPORTUNITIES

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    8/41

    DPMO ;DPMO ;

    jMEANS DEFECTS PER MILLION

    OPPORTUNITIES

    jIS TRANSLATED INTO A SIGMA

    NUMBER

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    9/41

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    10/41

    What is Six Sigma?Is an Organization-Wide Initiative to achieve zero defectsand reduce wastes (Muda) and variations in the processes

    Top Management commitment and strong reviewmechanisms are the key to the success of the Six sigmaInitiative

    Trained people who are skilled in undertaking the processesand also has the skill in the selection and application ofSixsigma tools to achieve zero defects are essential in thisinitiative

    During the initial deployment phases, Black belts have tospend at-least 50% of the time in the projects

    This is an initiative which will lead the organization in thelong run to achieve Six Sigma levels in each of theirmanufacturing/service processes

    Successful Organization wide deployment ofSix Sigma willtake a minimum of three years.

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    11/41

    Origin

    Six Sigma initiative was first developed by Mr. BillSmith, who was working as Quality Manager atMotorola

    With a strong commitment from Mr. Bob Galvin, thenCEO of Motorola, the implementation of the initiativebegan in 1986

    This initiative helped Motorola win the first MalcolmBaldrige Award in 1998

    Several of the major companies in the world haveadopted Six Sigma since then

    Texas Instruments, ABB, GE, Nokia Mobile phones,Sony, Dupont, Polaroid, American Express and Ford

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    12/41

    Birds eye view of Six Sigma

    Data based decision making. No AtmosphericAnalysis

    Structured troubleshooting done by cross functionalteams having Process Knowledge

    Project selection done by Top Management

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    13/41

    Six Sigma Focus RolledThroughput Yield (RTY)

    Y (RTY) = f(X) = Y1x Y2xY3xY4

    RTY Objective (100%)

    Methodology adopted is Funneling

    Big Y = Main Response for the problem

    X = Cause (s) that are not controllable. Theseas also called as Intermediate Ys

    Root Xs = Root Cause (s) that arecontrollable by implementing processimprovement actions

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    14/41

    Q

    THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION CURVE

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    15/41

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    16/41

    Q !

    ! !

    1 2 1 x x xx

    n

    i

    i

    n

    n n

    ....

    Q6 W 4 W5 W 3 W 2 W 1W 1W 2 W 3 W 4 W 5 W 6 W

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    17/41

    YIELD + DEFECT = 100%

    YIELD

    DEFECT

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    18/41

    Do you accept 1 % defect?j In every hour sending 22 000 cheques into the

    wrong account

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    19/41

    Do you accept 1 % defect?j In every hour sending 22 000 cheques into the

    wrong account

    j Unsafe drinking water almost 1 hour in a month

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    20/41

    Do you accept 1 % defect?j In every hour sending 22 000 cheques into the

    wrong account

    j Unsafe drinking water almost 1 hour in a month

    j No electricity for 7 hours each month

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    21/41

    Do you accept 1 % defect?j In every hour sending 22 000 cheques into the

    wrong account

    j Unsafe drinking water almost 1 hour in a month

    j No electricity for 7 hours each month

    j In a year your heart beat stops for 32 000 times, thismeans you are 100% surely100% surely100% surely DEAD!DEAD!DEAD!

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    22/41

    T

    Z USL T !

    W

    6 W 4 W5 W 3 W 2 W 1W 1W 2 W 3 W 4 W 5 W 6 W g g

    How Many Standard Deviations Are There Between USL and T?

    LSL USL

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    23/41

    0. 0.000003

    6 SI

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    24/41

    WHAT

    WE DO A

    S6

    SIGMA TEAM ?

    We

    take measurements

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    25/41

    WHAT

    WE DO A

    S6

    SIGMA TEAM ?

    We

    take measurements

    calculate Sigma Level

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    26/41

    WHAT

    WE DO A

    S6

    SIGMA TEAM ?

    We

    take measurements

    calculate Sigma Levelanalyze the measurements

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    27/41

    WHAT

    WE DO A

    S6

    SIGMA TEAM ?

    We

    take measurements

    calculate Sigma Levelanalyze the measurements

    detect areas for improvement

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    28/41

    W

    HATW

    E DO AS

    6S

    IGMA TEAM ?We

    take measurements

    calculate Sigma Levelanalyze the measurements

    detect areas for improvement

    come up with recommendations

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    29/41

    W

    HATW

    E DO AS

    6S

    IGMA TEAM ?We

    take measurements

    calculate Sigma Levelanalyze the measurements

    detect areas for improvement

    come up with recommendations

    implement

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    30/41

    WHAT WE DO AS 6 SIGMA TEAM ?

    We

    take measurements

    calculate Sigma Levelanalyze the measurements

    detect areas for improvement

    come up with recommendations implement

    control

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    31/41

    ClassificationofBlackBelt Projects

    CTQ (Critical to Quality)

    Scrap Reduction

    Rework reduction

    Variation Reduction Resolving customer complaints

    CTS (Critical to Satisfaction)

    No complaints from customer/user Project selected

    only to enhance the performance of theproduct/service level

    CTC (Critical to Cost)

    Process Optimization projects

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    32/41

    Measure &Calculate Implement

    ImproveAnalyze Control

    FLOW CHART OF SIX SIGMA

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    33/41

    HOW THE MEASUREMENTS ARE

    TAKEN?

    BY A TRAINED 6 SIGMA TEAM, CALLED BLACKBELTS

    WITH COOPERATION OF THE EMPLOYEE

    S

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    34/41

    SIGMA LEVEL

    S

    6 SIGMA

    5 SIGMA

    4 SIGMA

    3 SIGMA

    2 SIGMA

    6 SIGMA

    OUR AIM IS

    TO REACH 6S

    IGMA LEVEL TOGETHER

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    35/41

    WHAT SIX SIGMA WILL DO FOR USWHAT SIX SIGMA WILL DO FOR US

    HELPS IMPROVE :HELPS IMPROVE : First Pass Yield/Input OutputFirst Pass Yield/Input Output Delivery PromptnessDelivery Promptness

    Cost of QualityCost of Quality

    ... BY REDUCING OUR :... BY REDUCING OUR : Defects Per UnitDefects Per Unit Throughput TimeThroughput Time

    ... WHICH SHOW UP IN OUR:... WHICH SHOW UP IN OUR:

    Bottom Line ResultBottom Line Result CustomerSatisfactionCustomerSatisfaction

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    36/41

    W - M

    1

    10

    1001

    000

    10000

    100000

    1000000

    2 3 4 5 6

    SIGMA

    M

    VALUES COME FROMVALUES COME FROM

    SIX SIGMASIX SIGMA

    TRANSFER KNOWLEDGE THROUGHTRANSFER KNOWLEDGE THROUGH- QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

    - TROUBLESHOOTING

    QUALITYQUALITY--COSTCOST--TIMETIME

    BREAKTHROUGHBREAKTHROUGHSTRATEGYSTRATEGY

    Phase 1Phase 1MeasurementsMeasurements

    Phase 4Phase 4ControlControl

    Phase 3Phase 3ImprovementImprovement

    Phase 2Phase 2

    AnalysisAnalysis

    Benchmarking

    AverageCompany

    Best-in-Class

    ppm

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    37/41

    TROUBLESHOOTINGTROUBLESHOOTING

    SHORT TERM

    THE BREAKTHROUGH STRATEGYBREAKTHROUGHBREAKTHROUGHSTRATEGYSTRATEGY

    Phase 1Phase 1MeasurementsMeasurements

    Phase 4Phase 4

    ControlControl

    Phase 3Phase 3ImprovementImprovement

    Phase 2Phase 2AnalysisAnalysis

    Processparameter

    Productparameter

    LSL

    USL

    Adjustmentrange

    Distributionwithoutcontrollingtheprocessparameter

    Distributionwithfixedprocessparameter

    (reducedvariability)

    Processparameter

    Productparameter

    LSL

    USL

    Adjustmentrange

    Distributionwithoutcontrollingtheprocessparameter

    Distributionwithfixedprocessparameter

    (reducedvariability)

    MEASUREMEASUREMEASURMENTS

    Run 1

    Run 2

    Run 3

    Run 4

    Run 5

    Run 6

    Run 7

    ANALYZEANALYZE

    LSL TARGET USL

    IMPROVEIMPROVE

    CONTROLCONTROLNumber

    f

    ample

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 1 2 13 1 4 15 1 6 17 1 8 19 2 0

    OKr

    Bereic

    OKB 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800

    OK

    e Bereic

    1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670

    OKr

    Bereic

    1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170 1.170

    OK

    rBereic

    C

    1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545 1.545

    OK

    e Bereic

    C

    1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295 1.295

    Gemessene

    aten eff. 1.430 1.320 1.550 1.330 1.400 1.310 1.320 1.430 1.490 1.480 1.400 1.400 1.480 1.470 1.480 1.420 1.470 1.390 1.420 1.410

    Tolleranz 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500

    1/4Tolleranz 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125

    Number

    fS

    mple

    1.000

    1.100

    1.200

    1.300

    1.400

    1.500

    1.600

    1.700

    1.800

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 12 13 14 15

    USL

    UPCL

    LPCL

    LSL

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    38/41

    TROUBLESHOOTINGTROUBLESHOOTING

    SHORT TERM

    MEASUREMEASURE

    MEASURMENTS

    Run 1

    Run 2

    Run 3

    Run 4

    Run 5

    Run 6

    Run 7

    We dont know what we dont know

    We cant act on what we dont know

    We wont know until we search

    We wont search for what we dont question

    We dont question what we dont measure

    Hence, We just dont know...

    Dr Mikel Harry

    IF WE CANT EXPRESSWHAT WE KNOW IN THE FORM OF NUMBERS,IF WE CANT EXPRESSWHAT WE KNOW IN THE FORM OF NUMBERS,

    WE REALLY DONT KNOW MUCH ABOUT ITWE REALLY DONT KNOW MUCH ABOUT IT

    Dr Mikel Harry

    LET DATA BE THE BASE TO OUR ACTIONS!LET DATA BE THE BASE TO OUR ACTIONS!

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    39/41

    TROUBLESHOOTINGTROUBLESHOOTING

    SHORT TERM

    ANALYZEANALYZE

    NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONNORMAL DISTRIBUTION

    POINT OF DEFLECTION

    QW

    CUS

    S

    S

    UCTI

    N

    SUPPLI

    Or

    er

    O r

    er

    recep tion

    W riting

    purc!

    aseor

    ers

    Break

    own of

    or

    erPlanningof s upplies

    Plann ingof s upplies

    "

    ece ipt ofplanned

    supplies

    W riting

    purc!

    as e

    r rOrder

    OrderOrder

    con firmation

    Order

    con firmation

    NG INEERING

    PURCHASE

    RECEPTI

    N

    PROCESS APPINGPROCESS APPING

    Background Information

    Company XXXX Product ENGINEFactory YYYY Product ID 12345Location VSTERS Recorder B . SMITHDepartment 11 D at e A UG -12-1995

    Six Sigma Analysis

    No. Description Ord er D e f ec t s U n i ts D P U O TOP DPO Z1 Winding diameterWiA leg 1 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0400 2,90E-01 1 2 , 90E-01 1 1 2,90E-01 2,052 Winding diameterWiA leg 2 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0400 1,85E-01 1 1 , 85E-01 1 1 1, 85E-01 2 , 403 Winding diameterWiB leg 1 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0400 4,00E-01 1 4,00E-01 1 1 4,00E-01 1 , 754 Winding diameterWiB leg 2 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0400 1,97E-01 1 1 , 97E-01 1 1 1, 97E-01 2 , 355 Winding diameterWiC leg 1 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0400 3,94E-01 1 3 , 94E-01 1 1 3, 94E-01 1 , 776 Winding diameterWiC leg 2 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0400 2,43E-01 1 2 , 43E-01 1 1 2, 43E-01 2 , 207 Winding diameterWiD leg 1 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0400 5,00E-01 1 5,00E-01 1 1 5,00E-01 1 , 508 Winding diameterWiD leg 2 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0400 3,78E-01 1 3 , 78E-01 1 1 3, 78E-01 1 , 819 Dirt 2632.0002-001-0400 0,00E+00 1 0,00E+00 1 1 0,00E+00 6,00

    10 Winding diameterWiA leg 1 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0500 4,35E-01 1 4 , 35E-01 1 1 4, 35E-01 1 , 6611 Winding diameterWiA leg 2 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0500 4,91E-01 1 4 , 91E-01 1 1 4, 91E-01 1 , 5212 Winding diameterWiB leg 1 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0500 3,42E-01 1 3 , 42E-01 1 1 3, 42E-01 1 , 9113 Winding diameterWiB leg 2 2 6 3 2.0002-001-0500 5,00E-01 1 5,00E-01 1 1 5,00E-01 1 , 5014 Dirt 2632.0002-001-0500 5,88E-02 1 5 , 88E-02 1 1 5, 88E-02 3,0615 Common spacerring thickness 2632.0004-001-0120 1,03E-01 1 1,03E-01 1 1 1,03E-01 2 , 7716 Common spacerring thickness 2632.0004-001-0120 4,08E-04 1 4,08E-04 1 1 4,08E-04 4 , 8517 Common spacerring thickness 2632.0004-001-0120 2,51E-03 1 2 , 51E-03 1 1 2, 51E-03 4 , 3118 Common spacerring thickness 2632.0004-001-0120 1,05E-1 9 1 1 ,05E-19 1 1 1,05E-19 10,5119

    2021

    2223

    24

    2526

    27

    2829

    3031

    32

    33

    34

    35

    36

    37

    3839

    404142

    4344

    45

    Rolled = 5 18 0, 2 5 11 2 , 1 7

    COMPUTE THE SIGMACOMPUTE THE SIGMA

    7 QUALITY TOOLS7 QUALITY TOOLSCharts and Graphs

    Check Sheets

    Pareto Charts

    Cause and Effect (Ishikawa/Fishbone) Diagrams

    Scatter Diagrams

    Histograms

    Control Charts

    * EVALUATE THE PROCESS* EVALUATE THE PROCESS

    * DEFINE THE PROBLEM* DEFINE THE PROBLEM

    *DEFINE THE GOAL

    *DEFINE THE GOAL

    * PLAN FOR IMROVEMENT* PLAN FOR IMROVEMENT

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    40/41

    TROUBLESHOOTINGTROUBLESHOOTING

    SHORT TERM

    IMPROVEMENTIMPROVEMENT* SELECT VARIABLES* SELECT VARIABLES

    * DIAGNOSE PERFORMANCE* DIAGNOSE PERFORMANCE

    *UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM

    *UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM

    * EXECUTE IMPROVEMENTS* EXECUTE IMPROVEMENTS

    DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT

    A

    BC

    Trial A B C

    1 - - -

    2 + - -

    3 - + -

    4 + + -

    5 - - +

    6 + - +

    7 - + +

    8 + + +

    +

    -

    +

    -

    +-

    PERFORMANCE TOLERANCING

    Processparameter

    Productparameter

    LSL

    USL

    Adjustment range

    Distributionwithout controlling the

    process parameter

    Distributionwithfixed process parameter

    (reduced variability)

    Processparameter

    Productparameter

    LSL

    USL

    Adjustment range

    Distributionwithout controlling the

    process parameter

    Distributionwithfixed process parameter

    (reduced variability)

  • 8/6/2019 Six Sigma PTO

    41/41

    TROUBLESHOOTINGTROUBLESHOOTING

    SHORT TERM

    CONTROLCONTROL

    Statistical Process ControlNumber of S amp le

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

    O K r o#

    ereich O K#

    1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .8 00 1 .800

    O K g e#

    ereich U S L 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .6 70 1 .670

    O K r o#

    ereich LS L 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .1 70 1 .170

    O K g r #

    ereich U P$

    L 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .5 45 1 .545

    O K g e#

    ereich L P$

    L 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .2 95 1 .295

    Ge messene Daten ef f . 1 .4 30 1 .3 20 1 .5 50 1 .3 30 1 .4 00 1 .3 10 1 .3 20 1 .4 30 1 .4 90 1 .4 80 1 .4 00 1 .4 00 1 .4 80 1 .4 70 1 .4 80 1 .4 20 1 .4 70 1 .3 90 1 .4 20 1 .410

    T olleranz 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .5 00 0 .500

    1 /4 Tolleranz 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .1 25 0 .125

    Nu m b er o f S am p le

    1 . 00 0

    1 . 10 0

    1 . 20 0

    1 . 30 0

    1 . 40 0

    1 . 50 0

    1 . 60 0

    1 . 70 0

    1 . 80 0

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

    US L

    UP$

    L

    LP$

    L

    LSL

    Precontrol (Preset Control Limits)

    U S L U p p e r S p e c if ic a t io n L im it L S L L o w e r S p e c i f i c a t i o n L i m i t

    U P C L U p pe r P re co ntro l L im it L PC L L ow er P re co ntro l L im it

    * MONITOR PROCESS AFTER IMPROVEMENT* MONITOR PROCESS AFTER IMPROVEMENT

    * ENSURE CAPABILITY* ENSURE CAPABILITY

    LSL TARGET USL