Six Sigma Case Study: Six Sigma integrated with benchmarking ...
Six Sigma
-
Upload
sixsigmacentral -
Category
Documents
-
view
955 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Six Sigma
1
Six Sigma in Hospital OperationsSix Sigma in Hospital Operations
2
3
• Quality – Six Sigma View• Hospital Management – Key Challenges• Six Sigma in Hospital Operations
Overview
4
Quality…a perspectiveQuality…a perspective
• 20,000 items rejections per months
• ~15 minutes each day of unsafe drinking water
• 5,000 incorrect surgical operations per week
• 2 short or long landings at most major airports daily
• 200,000 wrong drug prescriptions each year
• 7 hours without electricity each month
The Classical View of Quality The Classical View of Quality
“ “99% Good” (3.899% Good” (3.8))
The Classical View of Quality The Classical View of Quality
“ “99% Good” (3.899% Good” (3.8))
• 7 items rejections per month
• 1 minute every 7 months of unsafe drinking water
• 1.7 incorrect surgical operations per week
• 1 short or long landing at most major airports every 5 years
• 68 wrong drug prescriptions each year
• 1 hour without electricity every 34 years
The Six Sigma View of Quality The Six Sigma View of Quality
“ “99.99966% Good” (699.99966% Good” (6))
The Six Sigma View of Quality The Six Sigma View of Quality
“ “99.99966% Good” (699.99966% Good” (6))
5
Increasing Productivity
Innovation
Intersection
Customer Insight
Hospital Management: Key Challenges
Low Cost
High Quality
6
Safe Environmen
t
Timely Services
Efficient Services
Effective Services
Data Collection
Hospital Operations: Key Challenges
Patient Centric CarePatient Centric Care
7
Six Sigma in Hospital Operations: Why?
With the increased focus on customer requirements and
pressure to deliver the best quality every time, cost of healthcare is escalating.
It has become of equal importance, to optimize the performance with respect to quality and
to optimize cost of care.
Six Sigma addresses both these concerns
8
What is Six Sigma?
Six Sigma is a “data driven”
problem solving methodology.
… how you utilize and implement that
methodology depends on you.
• A highly Structured and Data Driven Approach for Improved Customer Quality.
• A Measurement of Our Process and our Capability to deliver services.
• Goal of Six Sigma – Attain Less Than 3.4 Defects per Million Opportunities
Six Sigma?
9
Six Sigma Vs Traditional Approach
StatisticalProblem
StatisticalSolution
TraditionalApproach
PracticalProblem
PracticalSolution
Six SigmaApproach
Customer Focused . . .Bottom Line “cost” DrivenCustomer Focused . . .Bottom Line “cost” DrivenCustomer Focused . . .Bottom Line “cost” DrivenCustomer Focused . . .Bottom Line “cost” Driven
10
What’s Six Sigma . . .
• Generally “Sigma”Generally “Sigma” is used to designate the distribution or spread (standard deviation) about the mean (average) of any process or procedure.
• For a business, the Sigma For a business, the Sigma Capability (Z-value)Capability (Z-value) is a metric that indicates how well the process is performing.
DDDD
As DefectsGo Down . . . ZZZZ
. . . Sigma CapabilityGoes Up
308,537308,537308,537308,537
66,80766,80766,80766,807
6,2106,2106,2106,210
233233233233
3.43.43.43.4
PPM*PPM*PPM*PPM*
Defects perDefects per Million Million
OpportunitiesOpportunities
Defects perDefects per Million Million
OpportunitiesOpportunities
*PPM: Parts Per Million
2222
3333
4444
5555
6666
ProcessProcess
CapabilityCapability
ProcessProcess
CapabilityCapability
ZZZZ
11
MeasureDefine ImproveAnalyze Control
what is important to the customer:
Project Selection
Team Formation
Establish Goal
how well we are doing:
Collect Data
Construct Process Flow
Validate Measurement System
the process:
Analyze Data
Identify Root Causes
the process gains:
Ensure Solution is Sustained
the process performance measures:
Prioritize root causes
Innovate pilot solutions
Validate the improvement
DMAIC: Basics
12
Once the process is measurable, outcomes becomes measurable.
Right from patient’s admission to treatment to discharge, it is all measurable
As a result, the patient’s confidence and level of satisfaction increases.
Six Sigma- Application
13
Six Six Sigma Sigma
ProjectsProjects
Co
st
Services
Process
Some Six Sigma Projects at MHC…
Reducing Discharge TimeDischarge Time Before: 282 mins - After: 135 mins
Increase Dispatch Capacity-CPS Process Sigma improved by 1.22
Optimizing Diagnostics PricingAvg realization – 1.78 Sigma increased
Optimization of Dialysis ProcessProcess Sigma Increased by 1
Improving Lift Efficiency 50% Improvement in Customer Satisfaction 50% Process Capability increased
Standardization of Consumable Process Sigma improved by 3.4
Reducing Cathlab Waiting Time 30% improvement in waiting time
Reduction in CRBSI RateInfection reduction - 3.66 to 6 Sigma
14
High rate of Catheter Related Blood Stream Infections (CRBSI) in ICUs
Increased Length Of Stay (LOS) for patients, due to CRBSI
Patient Dissatisfaction
Revenue loss due to increased LOS
To Standardized process & eliminate CRBSI from MHC
Problem Problem
Goal Goal
CRBSI – Six Sigma approachCRBSI – Six Sigma approach
15
PeoplePeople
MaterialMaterial
HIGH ICU CRBSI RATES
HIGH ICU CRBSI RATES
ProcessProcess
Culture process
TNA data availableBSI Confirmation
Patient Immunity
Dressing Technique
EnvironmentEnvironment
Contaminated LinesPeriodic dressing
Sterilized material
Patient Behavior
Wire ControlInsertion Site
Causes for High CRBSI
Patient MovementEmergency /code
Multiple PricksSupervision
Assistance
TAT for informationCriteria for CRBSI
Sterile techniqueGuidelines for catheter
insertionUniversal Precaution
C/L protocol
16
Pt. in MICU
Patient consent & procedure explanation
Procedure preparation
Doctor's decision for C/L
Site –Subclavian /Femoral/Jugular
Site dressing
Suturing
Patient preparation & C/L insertion
Key Improvements
Monitoring
Site Drying
Hand Wash & Dr. Assistant Drying time for site, increased to 3-5
mins., as per WHO standards
Drying time for site, increased to 3-5
mins., as per WHO standards
Established measurements
system
Established measurements
system
Revised Standard procedures - Hand Wash Revised Standard procedures - Hand Wash
17
CRBSI Rate in MICU – 4 CRBSI Rate in MICU – 4
The Classical View of Quality The Classical View of Quality
“ “98.45% Good” (3.6698.45% Good” (3.66))
The Classical View of Quality The Classical View of Quality
“ “98.45% Good” (3.6698.45% Good” (3.66))
The Six Sigma View of Quality The Six Sigma View of Quality
“ “99.99966% Good” (699.99966% Good” (6))
The Six Sigma View of Quality The Six Sigma View of Quality
“ “99.99966% Good” (699.99966% Good” (6))
Achievement…Achievement…
CRBSI Rate in MICU – 1 CRBSI Rate in MICU – 1
The Classical View of Quality The Classical View of Quality
“ “99.61% Good” (4.1699.61% Good” (4.16))
The Classical View of Quality The Classical View of Quality
“ “99.61% Good” (4.1699.61% Good” (4.16))
CRBSI Rate in MICU – 0 CRBSI Rate in MICU – 0
18
Bed related Inpatient Functions
Out patients related Functions
Diagnostics and Treatment Functions
Administrative Functions
Research and Teaching Functions
Supply Chain
Medical OperationsMedical Operations
Administrative OperationsAdministrative Operations
Six Sigma Scope in Hospital Services
Focus on Process Capability, Utilization, Cycle Time, Cost Optimization
19
Six Sigma Infrastructure
The actual infrastructure and number of roles will be dependent on the size and complexity of an Organization &maturity stage of deployment of Six Sigma.
Six Sigma ChampionSix Sigma Champion
Master Black Belt Black Belt Green Belt Yellow BeltResourcesResources
Primary RolePrimary Role
Role DurationRole Duration 24 Months 18 Months 12 Months 6 Months
Culture change agent Mentor Project Identify opportunity
& Execute Project Execute Project
20
• LEADERSHIP COMMITMENT Time Effort Resources
• MANAGING WITH DATA Design-measure-analyze-improve-control
• TRAINING AND CULTURAL CHANGES Integrated business strategy Impact on career paths
Essential of for Six Sigma
21
Our focus...
“Providing highest quality at lowest cost”
22
Thank You