Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

41
Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    215
  • download

    0

Transcript of Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Page 1: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Situation Analysis

Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M

Page 2: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Social Factors

Project Factors

Institutional Factors

Teacher Factors

Learner Factors

Adoption Factors

Profiling the factors identify in the situation analysis

Page 3: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Introduction* Language programs are carried out by a particular

situation

* Clark (1987, xii) comments:

A language curriculum is a function of the

interrelationships that hold between subject-specific

concerns and other broader factors

* The purpose of situation analysis is to identify the

potential impact on the project.

Page 4: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Introduction * Example 1:

△ Situation:

1) foreign experts write a series of English textbooks

2) textbooks design to produce an oral based-language

course

△ Problem: very few teachers end up using new course and

revert to using the old government-provided textbooks

△ Comment:

1) new materials should be gradual

2) provide more teacher training

Page 5: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Introduction * Example 2:

△ Situation:

1) introduce English from third year of elementary school

2) produce new books

△ Problem:

1) few people review the materials

2) many complaints from teachers

△ Comment:

1) should be provided consultation with classroom teacher

2) do pilot testing

Page 6: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Introduction * Example 3:

△ Situation: a private university will produce their own

materials and publish them

△ Problem: few other institutes or schools want to use

them

△ Comment: should do some market research

Page 7: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Introduction * the procedure of institution:

(a) consultation with representatives: parents, students,

teachers (b) study and analysis of relevant documents: government

reports

(c) observation of teachers and students in relevant

learning settings

(d) surveys of opinions of relevant parties

(e) review of available literature related to the issue

Page 8: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

1. Societal factors

* foreign language teaching in different countries:

the role of foreign languages, their status in the curriculum, educational traditions and experience in language teaching, and the expectations that members have for language teaching and learning Holland: schools offer a range of foreign language United States: foreign languages in the school

curriculum is neither strong nor secure.

Page 9: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

1.Societal factor

• The impact of societal factors on language teaching: groups in the community or society:

1. Policy maker2. Educational officials3. Employers4. The business community5. Politicians6. Educational specialist, organizations7. Parents8. Citizens9. Students

Page 10: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

1.Societal factors

• The case of projects of community or national scope, some questions should noted:

1. What are current teaching policies?2. What are reasons for the project?3. What impact will it have? 4. What language teaching experience and

traditions exist?5. What are the views of professionals, parents,

students, and employers? 6. What community resources are available?

Page 11: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

1. Societal factors* Example 1:

△ Situation: focus on communicative curriculum and

downplay grammar

△ Problem: parents’ view & textbooks

△ Comment: should communicate with parents the

intension & textbooks should be reviewed

Page 12: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

1. Societal factors* Example 2:

△ Situation: an integrated-skills syllabus

△ Problem: employers complain school leavers don’t

have enough language skills for work purpose

△ Comment:

1) the course should be considered vocational schools

and employment

2) should consult employers

Page 13: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

2. Project factors* the curriculum projects are produce by a team of

people

(classroom teacher & other staff of a teaching institution)

* Constraints: time, resource, and personnel

* Some project factors need to be considered:

1. Who constitutes the projects group?

2. What are the management and responsibilities?

3. How are goals and procedures determined?

4. Who reviews the process of the project?

5. What experience, resources, and time frame of the project?

Page 14: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

2. Project factors * Example 1:

△ Situation: to develop a set of course materials, one of

the senior teacher is put in charge.

△ Problem: team members cannot agree with the goal and

writing materials

△ Comments:

(1) the appropriate qualifications and experience

(2) better communication

(3) specifications of roles

Page 15: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

2. Project factors * Example 2:

△ Situation:

1) a textbook writer needs help in developing a textbook

series, she hires three graduate students

△ Problem:

1) no skills to write independently

2) undertake little more than secretarial role in the project

3) cause intention and bad feeling

△ Comments: should test graduate students’ ability before

signing contract

Page 16: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

2. Project factors * Example 3:

△ Situation:

1) design a national textbook project

2) recruit professional writers

△ Problem:

1) few appropriate applicants: inexperienced and unsuitable

2) problem on the leader and disruption of the project

deadline

△ Comments:

1) put more focus on the role of project director

2) solve communication difficulties

Page 17: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

3. Institutional factors* Institution : a university, school, or language institute

=> create their own culture

* Morris (1994, 109) observe :

Schools develop a culture, ethos or environment

* Teaching Institution: teacher, groups, and departments

△ Their functioning: in unison, independently, or

confrontational relationship

△ Their ways of doing thing: textbooks or course guides

Page 18: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

3. Institutional factors △ Institutions have different levels of professionalis

m

1) strong sense of professional commitment

2) a culture of quality influence the operations

* Physical aspects 1)resource 2)reference’s room 3)pohtocopier 4)textbook, materials

Page 19: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

3.Institutional factors

Institutional factors relate to the following questions:

• What leadership is available?• What are the physical resource?• What is the role of textbook?• What is staff morale like?• What problems do teachers face?• What administrative support is available?• What reputation does the school have?

Page 20: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

3. Institutional factors * Example 1:

△ Situation:

1) the owner of private language institute want to solve

some problems

2) new director proposes excellent rationale

△ Problem: teacher resist it and don’t want to do changes

△ Comment:

1) teachers can involved in revamping and negotiating

with the school’s owner

2) some teachers should be replaced with teacher who are

open to accept the change

Page 21: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

3. Institutional factors * Example 2:

△ Situation: the school does not provide them with the

continued source of professional satisfaction they

need.

△ Problem: the institute is short of key teachers

△ Comment: provide with appropriate remuneration

(ex: mentor teachers, teacher trainers, or teacher

researchers)

Page 22: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Teacher factors

Teachers are a key factor in implementation of curriculum changes.

Dimensions: a) language proficiency b) teaching experience c) skill and expertise d) training and qualification e) morale and motivation f) teaching style g) beliefs and principles

Page 23: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Teacher factors

Others factors that need to concerned: 1) currently teach in the target schools (background/ training/ experience/

motivation) 2) proficient in English 3) beliefs 4) teaching load/ resources 5) typical teaching methods 6) to what extent are teachers open to change? 7) retraining 8) suggestions

Page 24: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Teacher factors

The importance of planning a language program:

1) what kind of program will teacher depend on?

2) what is the achieving goal ?

Teachers have different responsibility 1) mentoring or leadership roles 2) teaching load 3) to try out/refuse a new syllabus or materials

Page 25: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Teacher factorsExample 1:

Situation: implement a new task-based approach

Problem: teacher resist it ,they prefer current curriculum

Comments: 1) much wider consultation should be taken place 2) the goal should be clearly explained

3) teachers should be trained

Page 26: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Teacher factors Example 2:

Situation: use teachers’ own materials

Problem: 1) teachers are untrained 2) teachers ignore the policy

Comments: 1) hiring better-qualified teachers 2) provide materials writing workshops

Page 27: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Learner factorsLearners are the key participants in curriculum development project

Potentially relevant factors:

1) background 2) expectation 3) belief 4) preferred learning style

Page 28: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Learner factors

Learners may affect the results of projects in unexpected ways

a) fail to see any links between the book and an

examination b) school bag are not big enough to provide

other English books c) learning purpose may turn out to be off target

Page 29: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Learner factorsRelevant learner factors:

1) past language learning experiences 2) motivation 3) expectations for the program/teachers/

learners 4) expectations for the instructional materials 5) language teaching reflect any culturally

specific factors 6) homogeneous or heterogeneous group 7) learning approach 8) content 9) time to put into the program 10) learning resources

Page 30: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Learner factorsExample 1:

Situation: 1) an intermediate level conversation course

2) teacher uses many kinds of classroom activities

Problem: 1) students cannot see any point of attending

classroom activities 2) students request teacher- directed activities/error correction

Comment: 1) the goal should be clearly explained 2) questionnaire should be used 3) set up a better orientation and

methodology

Page 31: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Learner factors

Example 2:

Situation: 1) foreign experts devise an oral communication

skill program 2) the program reflects Western views of

teaching and learning

Problem: 1)teachers are untrained 2)the program is unstructured

Comments: compromise/consultation should be taken place

in advance

Page 32: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Learner factorsExample 3: Situation: 1) Young Western English teacher 2) relax and informal classroom

atmosphere

Problem: unprofessional

Comments: 1) teachers should be trained 2) informed of students/institution’s expectations

Page 33: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Adoption factors

Consider the relative ease or difficulty of introducing change into the system

1) affect teachers’ pedagogical value and beliefs

2) understanding of the nature of the language

3) second language learning 4) classroom practice 5) teaching materials

Page 34: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Adoption factors

Some questions need to be asked:

1) what advantages does the curriculum change offer

2) How compatible is it 3) Is the innovation difficult to understand 4) effect 5) have the features and benefits been clearly communicated to teachers 6) how clear and practical is it (Morris 1994, 109)

Page 35: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Adoption factors

Practicality is also a significant issue Communicative Language Teaching > Natural

Approach (materials and textbooks) (only a set of

guidelines)

Teachers also need to adopt new roles in the classroom Communicative Approach V.S Traditional Grammar

Approach

Implementation of a new syllabus needs to involve the cooperation of many agencies. Rodger (1984, 41)

Page 36: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Adoption factors

Example 1:

Situation: new state textbook

Problem: 1) material difficult to use 2) unsuitable for large classes 3) some of the content is unsuitable for

target population Comments: material should be introduced in

selected schools first

Page 37: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Adoption factors Example 2:

Situation: 1) English is the first time to be introduced in an EFL country 2) hire and given teacher-training program by a foreign expert

Problem: local trainers use traditional way of teaching

Comments: 1) should spend more time on selecting trainers 2) trainers should also provide feedback on the trainers’ performance through workshop

Page 38: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Profiling the factors identified in the situation analysis

Goal: identify key factors that might positively or negatively affect the implementation of curriculum plan

SWOT analysis: 1) examination- internal strengths and weaknesses 2) external opportunities and threats to the existence 3) successful operation

Example

Page 39: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Situation analysis profile Positives Negatives Societal factors ________ ________ Projects factors ________ ________ Institutional factors ________ ________

Teacher factors ________ ________ Learner factors ________ ________ Adoption factors ________ ________

Page 40: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Profiling the factors identified

in the situation analysis Conclusion: Situation analysis is to help identify the potential impacts on implementing curricul

um and some factors should be considered whe

n designing a project.

Page 41: Situation Analysis Instructor: Prof. Mavis Shang Kelly 9710001M Dora 9710011M.

Thank you