Second Greater Mekong Subregion Corridor Towns Development ...
Single Stop Inspection Cooperation in the Greater Mekong Subregion
description
Transcript of Single Stop Inspection Cooperation in the Greater Mekong Subregion
Single Stop Inspection Cooperation in the Greater Mekong Subregion
Assoc. Prof. Ruth Banomyong (PhD)Director, Centre for Logistics Research
Agenda• Introduction to the GMS• GMS Trade facilitation initiatives
– SFA-TFI– CBTA
• Single Stop Inspection• Single Window Inspection• Some Observations…
Trade Facilitation in GMS• Defined: trade, customs and transport facilitation, to
support accession and implementation of the international/regional agreements and commitments
• Focus of work: physical connectivity; legal agreement (CBTA); framework for action on trade facilitation
• Institutional mechanisms: trade facilitation working group meetings; committees under CBTA; GMS Customs directors-generals meetings
SFA-TFI Initiative• SFA-TFI re-enforces FTAs, WTO agreements,
Revised Kyoto Convention, ASEAN Transit Agreement and CBTA
• SFA-TFI deals with behind the border constraints in:– Information sharing and exchange regarding cargo
clearance,– Customs procedures harmonisation,– Sanitary and phyto-sanitary cooperation,– Trade logistics development, and;– Business visa for business people
• All of these are national issues and require regional level of cooperation
SFA-TFI Customs Gaps Reforms: customs reforms are ongoing but at different
stages of implementation (the Revised Kyoto Convention)
Differences in inspection regime (slow to adopt modern risk management techniques), transparency, automation and uneven use of electronic data interchange, clearance time
Customs-centered reforms, lack of support for other government agencies involved in cargo clearance
Land border systems underdeveloped, focus has been on ports and airports
SPS Inspection and Quarantine Gaps
Uneven regulatory and legal framework Slow and inadequate collection and
distribution of information on threats and responses
Lack of certified testing and quarantine facilities
Use of standards as non tariff barriers (NTBs) Lack of risk management in SPS agencies
Logistics Gaps Analysis
Lack of connectivity and capacity of infrastructure
Continue inefficient public sector operations
Simple, un-integrated logistics services
Limited demand for more sophisticated services
The GMS-CBTA Initiative
• Inconsistent and difficult border crossing formalities and procedures
• Restrictive visa requirements• Restrictions on entry of motor vehicles • Different standards on vehicles and drivers
across countries• Transit traffic difficult/not allowed
CBTA Features• Multilateral agreement that covers all aspects of cross
border movement of goods, vehicles and people• Makes reference and in conformity with international
conventions: Conventions on Road traffic; Road Signs and Signals, TIR; Temporary Importation of Commercial Road Vehicles; Containers; Harmonization of Frontier Control of Goods
• Comprises of one framework agreements+20 annexes and protocols
CBTA Focus
• Facilitation of border crossing formalities (single window and single stop customs inspection, coordinating of hours of operation; and exchange of advance information and clearance)
• Facilitate cross-border movement of people (multi-entry visa, recognition of driver license)
• Facilitate cross-border movement of goods (regional transit regime)
• Exchange of traffic rights• Requirements for admittance of road vehicles• Institutional Arrangements
12CBTA Institutional Mechanism
National Subregional
Cambodia NTFC
PRC NTFC
Viet Nam NTFC
Lao PDR NTTFC
Myanmar NTFC
Thailand NTFC
ADB RETA Support
Ministerial Joint Committee
Transport Customs Immigration Quarantine
subcommittees
CBTA- Chronology• 1998: preparation of Framework Agreement• 1998-2003: negotiation and signing of Framework
Agreement• 1999–2006: preparation and negotiation of
Annexes and Protocols• March 2007: 2nd Joint Committee Meeting, signing
of remaining annexes and protocol• 2005-2008: initial implementation of CBTA at
selected border crossing points• 2009 onwards: full implementation
FIRST PHASE (commencing in 2005/06)
SECOND PHASE (commencing in 2007)
THIRD PHASE (commencing in 2008/2009)
POTENTIAL NEW BORDER CROSSING POINTS
YOUYIGUAN (PRC) - HUU NGHI (VIE)
THAKHEK (LAO) – HA TINH (VIE)
LORK (CAM) – XA XIA (VIE)
BY 2009 FULL IMPLEMENTATION
15
SINGLE STOP INSPECTION• Single stop inspection is included in the GMS
CBTA (Article 4, Annex IV.) • The objective is to reduce duplicate inspections
by countries sharing a land border • Single stop inspections are carried out by both
customs services at the border on a site that is located in the territory of either country, or straddling the border
16
SSI CONCEPT• Border processing and inspection is carried out
once at the border for imported and exported goods and vehicles.
• Commercial vehicles, drivers and crew undergo export and import processing at the same time, jointly and simultaneously by inspection agencies from both countries.
• Vehicles only stop once at the border
17
OPTIONS FOR SSITwo basic methods of Customs control under SSI :
1. “Delegated authority/mutual recognition” Customs of one country delegates inspection authority
to the Customs of another jurisdiction.
2. “Joint Customs control/operating in foreign territory”Customs of both jurisdictions carry out joint, simultaneous/ or near simultaneous inspection in the other’s territory.
18
SINGLE WINDOW INSPECTIONWhat is SWI?• The Single Window approach to border clearance
aims to speed up and simplify information flows between trade and government to reduce delays and complexity in cross border trade.
• A single window is a system that allows traders to lodge information with a single body to fulfill all import-or-export related regulatory requirements.
• In practical terms, Single Window provides one “entrance” either physical or manual for the submission and handling of all data and documents and inspections related to the clearance of goods.
19
• SWI means streamlining, simplifying and elimination of duplicate information requirements of various government agencies. This reduces time, cost and administrative burden to clear goods.
• The information requirements of all relevant government agencies can be met efficiently and effectively. Trade is facilitated.
• In an automated environment, data is submitted on a single administrative document (electronic) to government through one agency.
SINGLE WINDOW INSPECTION (cont.)
20
SINGLE WINDOW INSPECTION (cont.)
• That Agency (generally Customs) electronically passes the information on to other competent agencies for their action.
• All government requirements are met through this single document.
• Some control and inspection responsibilities may be delegated to Customs.
21
Key Challenges in CBTA Implementation• National laws and regulations need to be revised• Institutions need to be established, broadened, and
strengthened • Capacity needed at national and border levels• Modern border infrastructure and equipment
required
• Goodwill and trust among Mekong countries is key
2222
199220062015
GMS Outputs:CONNECTIVITYFacilitating subregional trade and investment
Roads
Telecommunications
Power Transmission Line
23
Observation:Lessons from the GMS• Physical infrastructure - necessary but
not sufficient• Adopt a holistic approach• Ownership and strong political will-
ingredients to success• National and sub-regional priorities
need to be aligned
24