Single Molecule Electronics Kasper Moth-Poulsen, Chalmers University of Technology September 2013...
-
Upload
marvin-wedge -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Single Molecule Electronics Kasper Moth-Poulsen, Chalmers University of Technology September 2013...
Single Molecule Electronics
Kasper Moth-Poulsen, Chalmers University of Technology
September 2013
MCC075 Molecular Electronics
OutlineLecture 1
Background and MotivationExperimental Methods
Lecture 2 (Friday)
Molecular Design of Diodes, Switches etc.
Part 3
Self-assembly
Statistics
“Contacting Individual Molecules Using Mechanically Controllable Break Junctions”Jan van Ruitenbeek, Lecture Notes in Physics 680, 253-271 (2005)
The Vision II: Aviram and Ratner
• “the molecular rectifier”
A. Aviram and M. A. Ratner, “Molecular Rectifiers” Chem. Phys. Lett. Vol. 29, pp. 277-283, 1974.
Solution Based Systems
Initially No electrodes directly involved
Rotaxanes
Fraser Stoddard and co-workers eg early work: Pure &App/. Chem.,Vol. 65, No. 11, pp. 2351-2359,1993.
Important factors for the single molecule systems
Molecular orbitals
InterfaceElectrodes
Nature Nanotech. 4 (9), 551-556, 2009
The chemical anchor point: controls the self-assembly and is of paramount importance for the nature of the electron transport
Importance of the chemical contacts
Nano Letters 8 (1) 1-5, 2008.
Nature Nanotech. 4 (9), 551-556, 2009.
Nano Letters 8 (1) 1-5, 2008.
Nature Nanotech. 4 (9), 551-556, 2009.
~1 GΩ range 0.2-1 MΩResistance
b ~0,63 Å-1 ~0,39 Å-1
Solid state device
STM measurement
3.3 - 3.5 eV
2.5 - 2.8 eV
3.8 - 3.9 eV
nsat = 10
nsat = 9 nsat = 10nsat = 2
5.7 eV
2.3 eV 2.2 - 3.2 eV 1.4 - 1.8 eV
nsat = 20
Optical band gaps for ”infinite” polymers obtained by extrapolation of monodisperse oligomers
Calculation
Molecular Back-bone: does it matter?
Slide courtesy of prof. MB Nielsen, Univ. Copenhagen
Molecular Back-bone: does it matter?
Kushmerik, TS Mayer and co-workers J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 2827-2832
Tunnelling vs Hopping, where is the transition from small molecules to polymers?
Seong Ho Choi, BongSoo Kim, C. Daniel Frisbie, Science 2008
Hopping is temperature dependent
Tunnelling is NOT temperature dependent
Seong Ho Choi, BongSoo Kim, C. Daniel Frisbie, Science 2008
Tunnelling vs Hopping
Molecular Switches, 3 types
1) Conformation switches
2) Electronic switches
3) Translational switches
Conformational Switch
Emanuel Lörtscher, Jacob W. Ciszek, James Tour, and Heike Riel, Small 2006, 2, No. 8-9, 973 – 977
“Microfabricated Molecular Break Junction”
Switch
No-Switch
Emanuel Lörtscher, Jacob W. Ciszek, James Tour, and Heike Riel, Small 2006, 2, No. 8-9, 973 – 977
Ferdinan Evers and co-workers small 2009, 5, No. 19, 2218–2223
“Switching Driven by rotation in the central bond in the bipyridine unit, induced by alignment of the dipoles in the Nitro groups with the electric field”
Mayor, Wandlowski and co-workers Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 156-163
Conductivity vs torsion angle
Conductivity and torsion angle: detailed investigation
Molecular Switches, 3 types
1) Conformation switches
2) Electronic switches
3) Translational switches
3.3 - 3.5 eV
2.5 - 2.8 eV
3.8 - 3.9 eV
nsat = 10
nsat = 9 nsat = 10nsat = 2
5.7 eV
2.3 eV 2.2 - 3.2 eV 1.4 - 1.8 eV
nsat = 20
Optical band gaps for ”infinite” polymers obtained by extrapolation of monodisperse oligomers
Calculation
Electron delocalization via cross conjugation is less efficient than via linear conjugation
Molecular Back-bone: does it matter?
Slide courtesy of prof. MB Nielsen, Univ. Copenhagen
Cross-conjugation, where does it come from?
• It is all pz orbitals so why is the delocalization different?
So surprizing that the physists has come up with their own name for it:
“Quantum interference”
Chemist might say: we have known about it all the time:
ortho/para vs meta directing? Michael addition?
M. Mayor, H.B. Weber, J. Reichert, M. Albing, C. von Hänisch, D. Beckmann, M. Fischer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5834-5838.
Position of the Anchor Groups
Smaller conductance(by 2 orders of magnitude)
para: linear conjugation
meta: cross conjugation
Switching via changes in electronic states: Cross Conjugation and Quantum Interference
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja202471m |J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, 000–000
Hummelen and Solomon
Synthesis and initial Charactarisation: Hummelen and co-workers Org. Lett., 2006, 8 (11), pp 2333–2336Transport and Thery „evidence of Quantum Interference” JACS ASAP 2011 dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja202471m
Brønsted-Nielsen and co-workers Org. Lett. 2006 Vol. 8, No. 6 1173-1176 J. Org. Chem, Vol. 73, No. 8, 2008
Ox
Red
D. Dulic , S. J. Van Der Molen , T. Kudernac , H. T. Jonkman ,J. J. D. de Jong , T. N. Bowden , J. van Esch , B. L. Feringa ,B. J. van Wees , Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003 , 91 , 207402 .
Conjugation/cross conjugation photoswitch
How to Switch a Molecular Switch
• 1) thermal activation• 2) level allignment (gating)• 3) redox chemistry with reorganisation• 4) photoreaction• 5) magnetic switch
TPS
• Describe the different ways to activate switches
• 1) thermal activation• 2) level allignment (gating)• 3) redox chemistry with reorganisation• 4) photoreaction• 5) magnetic switch
SummaryMolecular Switches:
Conformational SwitchesElectronic SwitchesTranslational Switches
• 1) thermal activation• 2) level allignment (gating)• 3) redox chemistry with reorganisation• 4) photoreaction• 5) magnetic switch
Methods of contacting molecules• Scalability?• Tunability of a nanogap?• Single-molecule device possible?• Possible artifacts• Is gating possible?• For industry or for research?• How was it made?• How was the molecules designed?• What kind of switching?
5 min report (3 slides) + 1 A4 Written summarye-mail your presentation before oct 3 to
Seminar on Oct 5