Simulations of the May 20 MC3E Squall Line Case: Impacts ...€¦ · Wind tunnel data (no riming)...
Transcript of Simulations of the May 20 MC3E Squall Line Case: Impacts ...€¦ · Wind tunnel data (no riming)...
Simulations of the May 20 MC3E Squall Line Case: Impacts of Evolving Ice Habits on the Transition Region and Stratiform Precipitation
Anders A. Jensen1, Edwin L. Dunnavan2, Jerry Y. Harrington2, and Hugh Morrison1
1National Center for Atmospheric Research, 2The Pennsylvania State University
Benefits of evolving ice habits
•A new adaptive habit (AHAB) bulk ice method is used to study the impacts of ice habit evolution on squall line structure.
•The AHAB method predicts ice habits and shape evolution during riming and better predicts mass and fall speed evolution compared to traditional mass-dimensional (m-D) methods.
Structure of Leading-Line/Trailing-Stratiform MCS
Acknowledgements
Comparison Results
10-6
10-5
-18-16-14-12-10-8-6-4
Mas
s (g
)
Temperature (°C)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-18-16-14-12-10-8-6-4
Fall
spee
d (c
m s
-1)
Temperature (°C)
Wind tunnel data (no riming)
Wind tunnel data (riming)
m-D (no riming)
m-D
(rim
ing)
AHAB (no riming)
AHAB (riming)
Parcel comparision
Figure 1 (left). Mass and fall speed as fuctions of temperature for 15 minutes of growth from wind tunnel data (dots), the AHAB model (filled regions), and mass-dimensional relationships (sold lines). Results from the AHAB model show a range of bulk distribution shape parameters.
•The method reduces riming growth errors across a range of temperatures compared to the tradional m-D method
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
-18-16-14-12-10-8-6-4
Rat
e (g
kg-1
s-1)
Temperature (°C)
0.1
1
10
100
1000
-18-16-14-12-10-8-6-4-2
Rel
ativ
e er
ror
(%)
Temperature (°C)
Binvapor growth
Bin riming
Bulkvaporgrowth
Bulk riming
m-Dvapor growth
m-D riming
Figure 2 (above). a) Vapor depositional growth rates for the bulk model (gray shaded region), bin model (solid black), and using m-D relationships (black 'x'). Riming rates for the bulk model (magenta shaded region), bin model (solid magenta), and using m-D relationships (magenta 'x'). b) Absolute value of the relative errors for bulk (solid) and m-D relationships ('x') relative to the bin model for vapor growth (black) and riming (magenta).
•Simple parcel model simulations show that the AHAB approach captures ice particle shape evolution for both planar and columnar ice, as well as other particle properties compared to a bin model
-20
-15
-10
-5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
Time (min)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
IWC
(g
kg-1
)
Time (min)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Fall
spee
d (c
m s
-1)
Time (min)
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Effec
tive
den
sity
(kg
m-3
)
Time (min)
0.1
1
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Asp
ect
ratio
Time (min)
0
1
2
3
4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
D
Time (min)
Figure 3 (left). Bulk (shaded regions) and bin model (solid lines) parcel simulation output with riming for planar (magenta) and columnar (gray) ice. Shown is parcel temperature, ice water content, fall speed, density, aspect ratio, and mass-weighted maximum diameter.
Present and Future Work
AHAB Model Output ~8 hours into SimulationPerpendicular to Storm
•The mature AHAB squall line shows all three regions and consistent dynamical structure•AHAB Model shows planar ice descending into stratiform region
Figure 5 (right). Vertical cross section of calculated line-averaged reflectivity from integrated size distributions (simple) for i.) Rain, ii.) Ice crystal plates, and iii.) Ice crystal columns. Cloud and hydrometeor condensate are contoured in black at 0.01 g/kg and wind vectors are storm relative, line-averaged height perturbation winds. The "z" component of the wind vector was multiplied by 100 to show storm dynamics.
KVNX
KINXSGP
•Most Bulk microphysical
schemes have difficulty modeling
the reflectivity structure of this
type of MCS.
•These figures from KINX show
the three different regions of the
system: The Convective Region,
the Transition Region, and the
•Forward modeling of Dual Polarization radar variables such as ZDR with
AHAB will help us compare the model's microphysics with reality.
•Interpolation of PPI scans can be used to grid radar observations however dual polarization variables do not plot well at lower levels (See figure below).
Figure 4.a) (Upper right) PPI scan from KINX that shows the structure of the MCS over Oklahoma at 15.5 Z, May 20 2011.Figure 4.b) (Lower right) Gridded, rotated, and interpolated PPI scan so that a cross section can be made along the X-Axis. The far right plot seems to show evidence of ice particles being advected from the convective updraft into the stratiform region.
AHAB KVNX (Time ~ 9 UTC)
Reflectivity (dBZ)
DifferentialReflectivity
(dB)
StratiformRegion
ConvectiveRegion
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Science Program Atmospheric System Research, an Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research program, under Grants DE-SC0012827. We thank Matt Kumjian for his radar analysis.
TransitionRegion