Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

34
1 Qualitative Analysis: SiO2 and Polystyrene NP Etching Using Lactic Acid Ann Meek | Sarin Parikh |Suranjan Oruganti

Transcript of Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Page 1: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

1

Qualitative Analysis: SiO2 and Polystyrene

NP Etching Using Lactic Acid

Ann Meek | Sarin Parikh |Suranjan Oruganti

Page 2: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Shout Out

Dr. Esener,

Negin M., Yasan Y., and Mukanth V.

2

Page 3: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

OutlineI. IntroductionII. Objective and BackgroundIII. ProcedureIV. ResultsV. DiscussionVI. Conclusion

3

Page 4: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Motivation

4

“Convincing the macrophages that the nanoparticles were part of the body and shouldn’t be cleared.”

To the left: A peptide “passport” attached to nanoparticles tells macrophages “Don’t eat me” (credit:: Mary Leonard, Biomedical Art & Design)

Page 5: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Introduction

5

To engineer quasi-molecular complexes for

highly specialized delivery, it is essential to understand

endocytosis (right): the mechanism by which a cell internalizes a vesicle from

its’ surroundings.

Melis Çağdaş, Ali Demir Sezer and Seyda Bucak (2014). Liposomes as Potential Drug Carrier Systems for Drug Delivery, Application of Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, PhD.

Ali Demir Sezer (Ed.),

Page 6: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Objective

The goal of this experiment is to qualitatively assess the etching characteristics of a nanoparticle in an endosomal

environment.

6

Page 7: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Why Silica & Lactic Acid?• The material must be versatile in its surface functionality, size-

modulation and porosity. Biological-relevant functionality include: favoring colloidal stability, long-time blood circulation. The evaluation of silica-based nanoparticles as drug carriers has become very popular among the last 5 years or so (Slowing et al. 2008; Di Pasqua et al. 2008; Rosenholm et al. 2010).

• Late endosomes contain lactic acid of pH 4.5-5.5 and could melt away the thin silica shell.

7

Page 8: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Effects of nanoparticles on the body

8

Flow-chart to the left: Klara Slezakova, Simone Morais and Maria do Carmo Pereira (2013). Atmospheric Nanoparticles and Their Impacts on Public Health, Current Topics in Public Health, Dr. Alfonso Rodriguez-Morales (Ed.),

Page 9: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Procedure

9

Page 10: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Procedure

I. Coating with TMOS and APTMSII. WashingIII. CalcinatingIV. Sealing with PLLV. EtchingVI. Analyzing

10

Page 11: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

I. Coating with TMOS and APTMS

• Polystyrene beads were mixed with 2 samples of ethanol, APTMS and TMOS were mixed in a solution with the beads and sonicated.

11Jung, Hak-Sung, Doo-Sik Moon, and Jin-Kyu Lee. "Quantitative Analysis and Efficient Surface Modification of Silica Nanoparticles." Journal of Nanomaterials 2012 (2012): 1-8. Web.

TMOS

Page 12: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

II. Wash• The samples were washed using ethanol • Centrifuged at 4000 RPM, 20 °C for 10 min• Extra liquid was pipetted out

12

Page 13: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

III. Calcinate• Sample particles mixed with ethanol

and sonicated• Placed on 4 glass slides for 12 hours

at 480 °C• Slide washed once with ethanol and

3x with water and emptied into respective vials

• 3 solutions created with lactic acid at pH 2.1, 4.5, 6.9.

13

Void

Polystyrene

Calcinated

Non-Calcinated

Page 14: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Before & After Calcination

Réfega, Ricardo. "Nanoparticles in Biomedical Imaging." Fundamental Biomedical Technologies (2008): Web.14

Page 15: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

IV. Seal with PLL

• Silicic acid added to PLL to seal particles overnight.

1515

Void

Polystyrene

Calcinated

Non-Calcinated

Page 16: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

SEM of Nanoparticles

Calcinated Non-Calcinated

16

Page 17: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

V. Etching• 26 solutions were created using a lactic acid

solution and 37°C bath

17

Page 18: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

18

Page 19: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

VI. Analysis Each sample placed on siliconwafer for analysis under SEM.

19

Page 20: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

ResultsDLS

SEM

IMAGE J

20

Page 21: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

DLS DataNon-calcinated Calcinated

21

Page 22: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Results Calcinated at pH 4.5

22

10 min 1 hr

6 hr Overnight

Page 23: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Results Non-Calcinated at pH 4.5

23

10 min

6 hr Overnight

1 hr

Page 24: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Results Calcinated at pH 2.1

24

1 hr

Overnight

Page 25: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Results Non-Calcinated at pH 2.1

25

1 hr

Overnight

Page 26: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Results Calcinated at pH 6.9

26overnight

1 hr

Page 27: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Results Non-Calcinated at pH 6.9

27

1 hr

Overnight

Page 28: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

To Summarize

28

Page 29: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Discussion

● PLL protected the silica!● From our results, we gathered that the PLL barrier prevented

the silica from etching.

29

Page 30: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Room For Improvment

- Washing: the etching is pH sensitive. - Use Dye as maker: For noncalcinated particles we can use

fluorescent dye in the NP that are released upon rupture. Then use UV-Vis.

- Preventing colloidal aggregation

30

Page 31: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Sources of Error

- TMOS and APTMS added in separate vials- Image J was used for analysis

31

Page 32: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Conclusion and Thoughts ● It must be noted that agglomerate forms of nanoparticles

might interact differently in a system than in single form.● To keep the nanoparticles in monodispersed suspension,

coatings must be applied● PLL can be used as a protector from etchants● Longer circulating pattern for NP coated with PLL and PEG

32

Page 33: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Thank You- Dr. Esener, - (Dr. Tao, Dr. Sirbuly, Dr. Luo, Dr. Horvath).- Negin M., Yasan Y., and Mukanth V.- Thank you audience for listening

33

Page 34: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates

Questions?

34