SIL Transmitters Configuration
-
Upload
yousafzaikhan81995 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of SIL Transmitters Configuration
-
7/29/2019 SIL Transmitters Configuration
1/4
ABB SACE S.p.A.Business Unit Instrumentation
Me
ters
Red sheet
Sa
fety
Safety
Safety concept
Safety is:
The protection of human lives, the environment and essentialequipment
Safety systems :
in case of plants that present an intolerable level of Hazard ri sk due to
certain process conditions, external risk reduction facilities like ESD orSIS may be used. Transmitters play an important role in these systems.
Applications
Emergency shutdownFire & gas protectionBurner management
Rotating machineryInterlocksRemedial Action Schemes for Power Distribution
Launch Control Systems
Customer benefits
Equivalent safety performances but different costs for :
-
7/29/2019 SIL Transmitters Configuration
2/4
ABB SACE S.p.A.Business Unit Instrumentation
Me
ters
Red sheet
Sa
fety
Safety
Integrity
Level
Low Demand Mode of
OperationProbability of failure to perform its design
function on demand
Cont/High Demand Mode of
Operation
Probability of a dangerous failure per year
SIL 4 >=10-5
to =10-5
to =10-4
to =10-4
to =10-3
to =10-3
to =10-2
to =10-2
to
-
7/29/2019 SIL Transmitters Configuration
3/4
ABB SACE S.p.A.Business Unit Instrumentation
Me
ters
Red sheet
Sa
fety
Safety Standard
?s Safe failure 295 FIT 144 FIT
?d Dangerous failure 706 FIT 344 FIT?sd Safe detected failure 134 FIT
?su Safe undetected failure 160 FIT?dd Dangerous detected failure 669 FIT 260 FIT
?du
Dangerous undetected failure 37 FIT 83 FITDont care 181 FIT 134 FIT
DC Diagnostic Coverage 94,88 %
SFF Safe Failure Fraction 96,73 % 82,73 %
What do the manufacturers offer?
These days most end user require to the Contractors to build the plants choosing components that assurecertain safety (SIL) level. In addition to that it is required a low level of spurious failure, i.e. when the plant isshut down because of a failure of the transmitter. In order to c ompare the transmitters are necessary theHARDWARE FAILURE RATES (lambda), three level of information are today offered.
Improved level
An improvement of the basic level is to have thesame data CERTIFIED BY A THIRD
AUTHORIZED BODY, such as TV or similar.
This gives the customer the confidence that thefailure data are properly calculated, but THIS ISNOT A SIL 2 CERTIFICATION as clear specify in
the body report.
When you have to deal with human integrity etc, isthat the device must be built in such a mode that... tolerates one fault without creating risk for ....The declarations clearly says HFT (Hardware FaultTolerance) is 0 and, it does not even mentionsoftware fault tolerance.
SIL 2 certified instrument
It meets reliability and safety parameters
The data are certified
The complete instrument is certified
The internal software is redundant
It is one fault tolerant
It is manufactured according to acertified process
Basic level
The manufacturer makes a unilateraldeclaration of safety data (performances).
The customer has not assurance about the
correct calculation of these data.
Note: the table shows the 2600T safety data.
-
7/29/2019 SIL Transmitters Configuration
4/4
ABB SACE S.p.A.Business Unit Instrumentation
Me
ters
Red sheet
Sa
fety
A safety transmitter increases safety, but
consider spurious failures
Often two instrument are used in parallel, tinorder to meet the Hardware Fault Tolerance(HFT) required for SIL loops. But in this wayalso the probability of spurious failures isdoubled.
Instead, a single safety transmitter hasredundancy and self -diagnostic to meet theHFT requirements, and also spurious failuresare lower if compared to two instruments, buthigher than a normal pressure transmitter.
Additional remarks
What other should the end user remember?
The safety transmitter are not to be installed everywhere,but in safety loops they provide considerable savings whileassuring equivalent performances.
The safety transmitter has the same maintenancefrequency of a standard one.
How can you avoid that safety turns into reduced plant
profitability?
In order to avoid spurious plant shut down, some user install anadditional third transmitter shutting down only when twotransmitters ask it (2 out of 3). In this case spurious shut do wnare greatly decreased.
This solution has the same performances of two Safety
transmitters in parallel, this allows not to stop the plant in c ase ofa spurious failure thank to the signal of the one that says it srunning properly. In fact if one fault develops in one transmitt er
only, it is clearly an internal one. In other words the one thatworks has no fault and delivers the right measure.
Then the user can disconnect the faulty one and check what hashappened, without loosing plant operation
Again two safety transmit ters are less expensive than treestandard ones.