SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.
-
Upload
byron-benson -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.
![Page 1: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SiD MDI
Marco Oriunno, SLAC
ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011
![Page 2: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2M.Oriunno, Eugene, Or Nov.2010
Outline of the talk
1. Push Pull
2. Vibrations
Other SiD - MDI talks in this conference :
Sunday, Vibration Measurements and Transfer Functions at SLAC, K. Bertsche
Monday, Feedback Analysis with current xfer functions & beam parameters G.White
Monday, SR Update, M. Sullivan
Monday, HOM heating at the IP and in QD0, A. Novohatski
Monday, FSI Alignment, K. Riles
![Page 3: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
QD0 supported from the doors
QD0
1. SLD Experience
2. QD0 push-pull with the detector
3. Low L* ~ 3.5 m
![Page 4: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ILD SiD
ILD and SiD differences
Weight= 15 ktonnes Weight= 10 ktonnes
ILD SiD
![Page 5: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Option 1, ILD and SiD moving on the floor
Option 2, ILD on a platform, SiD moving on the floor
Option 3, ILD and SiD on platforms
Impact of this option has been studied by ILD
Not favorable to SiD – heavy impact on CE
Under Study
![Page 6: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SiD nominal mass: Barrel 5000 T; (each) Door 2500 T
Dimensions:Z = 20.0 mX = 20.0 mDelta Y = 9 m (Top of Platform to beamline)
Positioning Tolerance on beamlineConsider points Z=+-max, X=0. Position to + 1mm wrt references in X,Y,ZConsider points Z=+-max, X=+-max: Position to +- 1 wrt references in Y.
SiD Platform Functional Requirements
Static Deformations: <+-2 mm
Vibration budget < 50nm between 1 and 100 Hz, at the QD0’s (relative)
Seismic stability: Appropriate for selected site. (Beamline must be designed with sufficient compliance that VXD will survive)
![Page 7: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SiD Platform Functional Requirements
Wall clearance ~10 mm. Platform comes to side wall, there is no apron or apron matches platform elevation.
gap,10 mm
![Page 8: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SiD Platform Functional Requirements
Surface Features: Steel Surface near legsSteel rails for doors“Receptacles” for tie seismic tiedowns of SiD Barrel and DoorsRemovable Safety railings
Detector on platform Top View Platform Top View
Steel Surface
![Page 9: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SiD Platform Functional Requirements
Reliability: Transport modularity must be such that repairs/replacement/maintenance can be accomplished in garage position and within 20 elapsed days.
Any equipment required for transport shall reside below the platform surface.
Transport equipment shall not eject particulates that reach platform surface (need spec on how much)
Accelerations: <1 mm/s^2
Transport velocity: V>1 mm/s after acceleration
Life: 100 motion cycles.
![Page 10: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Thick platform
Extra Height to accommodate the difference of the two detectors
2.2 m3.8 m
20 m 20 m
![Page 11: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Gripper Jacks on rail
Rails
Rollers
Anti-seismic support
Gripper jacks
![Page 12: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Motion system
Gripper Jacks, 1’000 T
DL-G1000 gripper jack for load out of offshore structures (1000 tonnes push / pull capacity)
![Page 13: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Vibrations
![Page 14: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
QD0 stability Requirements
Most acute luminosity loss mechanism due to relative jitter of final focusing magnet elements : Ground Motion and Mechanical vibration sources
ILC has Active Fast Feedback based on beam trajectory after collision
Max. Integrated displacement: 100÷200 nm > 5 Hz
Lumi loss due to beam offset in SD0 (beamsize growth) and IP misalignment of beams
G.White
98%
G.White
96%
![Page 15: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Vibrations : Absolute, Relative and Coherent and motion
Relative displacement spectrum
Coherence :
If P1=P2, then : Jo = 0th Bessel functionL= distance between pointsv = speed of sound in rock, ~3 km/s
P1 P2
Ground Motion Model (A.Sery)
![Page 16: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
QF12 x L*
FD
M
K C
CfKf
QF12 x L*
FD
M
K C
CfKf
QD0 Supports
High Coherence
Low Coherence
Door DoorBarrel
![Page 17: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
QD0
Kfoot
Kplatform
Mass of the door
QD0
Floor Elasticity, not included
SiD Vibration Model : 1 degree of freedom M,K,C oscillator
![Page 18: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1st Mode, 2.38 Hz 2nd Mode, 5.15 Hz 3rd Mode, 5.45 Hz
4th Mode, 6.53 Hz 5th Mode, 10.42 Hz 6th Mode, 13.7 Hz
Vertical motion
SiD Free Vibration Mode
![Page 19: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
fo = 5 Hz fo = 10 Hz
PSD PSD
Integrated r.s.m. displacement
Integrated r.s.m. displacement
Random vibration Studies : SiD O.K. on the floor, no platform
30 nm20 nm
![Page 20: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Kfoot
Kplatform
M door
QD01st mode system
SiD Vibration Model : 1 degree of freedom M,K,C oscillator
22
22
pf
pfn ff
fff
f foot = 10 Hz from FEA, f platform =
6 Hz, supported edges
30 Hz, int.support, door-on-barrel
15 Hz, int. support, door-on-platform
f n =
5 Hz
9 Hz
8 Hz
c = 2%
ff = 1st mode SiD foot
fp = 1t mode platform
![Page 21: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
fn = 5 Hz fn = 8 Hz
fn = 9 Hz fn = 10 Hz
Free span, supported edges
∞ Rigid Platform
![Page 22: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22M.Oriunno, Eugene, Or Nov.2010
Platform Simulation
Benchmark with exp.data
![Page 23: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The CMS Plug
![Page 24: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Experimental Vibration measurements – CMS Plug
![Page 25: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CMS Platform
Iron re-bars (equivalent th. 25 mm)
Iron re-bars (equivalent th. 25 mm)
Concrete, 2150 mm
Total thick. 2.2 m 2D Plate Model
3D Model
Finite Element Model, 3D vs. 2D
![Page 26: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Mode 1
Mode 5
Mode 4
Mode 3
Mode 2
Mode FREQ 1 20.17 2 41.12 3 53.24 4 72.76 5 73.28 6 95.85
Free modes
1
2
3
4
5
6
![Page 27: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
freq
Damp. 6.5%Damp. 4%Damp. 2%Exp.
Transfer Functions - Middle Point (Geophone N.3)
Simulated vs. Experimental
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 1000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
freq
0.707*Max. Ampl
*fn
*fn
Critical dampingf2 – f1)/2* fn
Exp. Evaluation of the damping ratio
![Page 28: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
100
101
102
10-22
10-21
10-20
10-19
10-18
10-17
10-16
10-15
10-14
Hz
m2/Hz
PSD - Damp. 6.5%PSD - Damp. 4%PSD - Damp. 2%PSD - Exp.PSD - Ground
Resonance at ~20 Hz
Simulations vs. Measured Power Spectra (Platform Center)
Peaks 80 and 90 Hz
)()()(2
fPgroundfFtfSy
![Page 29: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Integrated Displacement (r.m.s.)
100
101
102
10-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
Hz
m
Damp. 2%Damp. 4%Damp. 6.5%Exp.Ground
Hz
f
dffPx100
2
1
)(
Damp. 2% Damp. 4% Damp. 6.5%
![Page 30: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: SiD MDI Marco Oriunno, SLAC ALCPG11 Eugene- Oregon, March 2011.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051621/56649f345503460f94c50fc5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Summary
SiD is designed with the QD0’s supported from the doors
SiD can be moved without a platform, ILD can’t. The Platform is the only compatible solution, which does not require modification in the design of both detectors
SiD will move on a platform upon condition it meets functional requirements : dimensions, static, vibration, floor, etc
With these requirements, we expect the platform designed by the CFS group. The two platforms do not need to be identical.
The effects of vibrations on beam stability remain a subject which need more studies
New set of experimental vibration data available for the CMS Pug/platform
The data have been used to benchmark FEA with positive results.
Experimental characterization of the dynamic properties of reinforced concrete structure is underway (See K.Bertsche talk today)