Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

download Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

of 24

description

A comparison of three symphonies

Transcript of Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    1/24

    Symphonies

    Characteristics

    Era

    Composition Year(s)

    I

    AllegroBeginning Key Dmin/Cmaj

    Time Signature 4 4

    Form

    Texture Harmonic

    1 subject group: bars 1 to 6

    First movt has many parts to it

    Idea of continous development (develops idea from start)

    [this can be found in Beethoven's 9th Symphony]

    Compresses the recapitulation

    Second subject/Closing subject tapers off suggesting transition?

    Bars 22 and 23 - Timp - Anticipates rythym of second movement

    Notes

    Orchestration

    Division

    Page 1

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    2/24

    Symphonies

    Page 2

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    3/24

    Symphonies

    II

    Poco allegretoGmaj

    2 4

    Scherzo/Ternary

    Polyphonic - Chamber Music

    Intermezzo

    Soft, playful

    Rhythm previously anticpated found in Violin at beginning

    Chamber music style in the winds

    This movt is primarly winds

    Grouped for Ternary:

    A - Chamber music

    B - Strings join with pizzicato

    A - Exclusively windsABA leads us to deduce that it could be a Scherzo/Slow Movement

    But it really functions as a dance movt/intermezzo

    Symphony No.

    Romanti

    1914-

    3 Flutes (with 1

    3 O

    3 Cla3 Bassoons (with 1 Co

    4 H

    3 Tru

    3 Tro

    Tu

    2 Tim

    2 Vi

    2 Vi

    Ce

    4 'P

    Doubl

    Page 3

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    4/24

    Symphonies

    Page 4

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    5/24

    Symphonies

    III

    Poco adagio quasi andanteEmaj?

    4 4

    Polyphonic

    Orchestral

    Minor Mode character

    Very motific (long melodies built up of small fragments)

    Chamber style again at 34

    Minor/Major contrast (at 34)

    [rhythm at 35 in Flutes, like Beethoven Piano Concerto 4 II movt]

    Major Mode character (at 35)

    Carl Nielsen

    /Modern

    1916

    iccolo doubling)

    oes

    rinets ntrabassoon doubling)

    rns

    pets

    bones

    ba

    panis

    lins

    olas

    llo

    arts'

    Bass

    Page 5

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    6/24

    Symphonies

    Page 6

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    7/24

    Symphonies

    IV

    AllegroEmaj

    3 4

    Harmonic

    Begins with first movt's second theme rhythm

    Bars 6 and 7 after 45 in the Flutes returns as a strong conclusion later

    Struggle between Romanticism and Modernism in the syphony is rife

    But in the end, Romanticism triumphs

    Page 7

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    8/24

    Symphonies

    Page 8

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    9/24

    Symphonies

    I

    Allegro con brioCmin

    2 4

    Sonata

    French Horns, Trumpets, Strings prominent through whole symphony

    Exposition

    1st Theme - Cminor

    2nd Theme - Relative major (Cmaj) repeat

    Recap

    C major

    built up on very short periods (choppy, suppressed, angry)

    Page 9

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    10/24

    Symphonies

    Page 10

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    11/24

    Symphonies

    II

    Andante con motoAb maj to C maj

    3 4

    Double variation

    Classical Era: Min work II movt commonly in submediant maj

    [eg: Mozart D minor Concerto (Movt II in Bb maj)]

    [eg: Brahms Symphony Cmin (Movt II in Ab maj)]

    First section in submediant major (Ab maj)

    Second section in mediant major (C maj)

    Cmaj is the tonic major of the sumphony

    Cmaj prepares the listener for the Cmaj of the finale

    SYMPH

    Symphony No. 5 L

    Clas

    1804-

    2 Fl

    2 O

    2 Cla2 Bas

    2 H

    2 Tru

    Tim

    2 Vi

    Vi

    3 Trombones (Alto, Tenor,

    Ce

    Doubl

    Piccolo (Mov

    4 Mov

    Contrabassoon (

    Page 11

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    12/24

    Symphonies

    Page 12

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    13/24

    Symphonies

    III

    Scherzo. AllegroCmin to Cmaj and back

    3 4

    Minuet (Scherzo) and Trio - Ternary

    Scherzo - Cmin - "Mangled Binary"

    Theme A

    Varied A

    Codetta

    Trio - Cmaj - Rounded Binary

    Theme B

    Modified B

    Soft transition back to the abbreviated Scherzo

    Timps throughout, fragments of the Scherzo heardTransforms to C major

    Mysterious, almost threatening

    Builds up from dark C minor coda

    To a bright dominant 7th tremolo string chord

    ONIES

    dwig van Beethoven

    sical

    1808

    utes

    oes

    rinets soons

    rns

    pets

    pani

    lins

    la

    Bass Movement IV only)

    llo

    Bass

    ment IV only)

    ments

    ovement IV only)

    Page 13

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    14/24

    Symphonies

    Page 14

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    15/24

    Symphonies

    IV

    AllegroCmaj to Gmaj to C

    4 4

    Sonata

    Exposition

    Theme 1 - Transtion - Cmaj to Gmaj

    Theme 2 - Scherzo - Gmaj, flattened sixth

    Development

    Almost exclusively develops Theme 2 (Movt III link)

    Recapitulation

    Theme 1 stays in C maj

    Theme 2 stays in C maj , flattened sixth

    CodaTheme 2

    Followed by a version of Theme 1

    Final chord

    Open 5th in C - not maj or min

    Orchestration note:

    Unusual piccolo and trombones

    Page 15

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    16/24

    Symphonies

    Page 16

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    17/24

    Symphonies

    I

    Allegro molto moderatoD Dorian mode creates ambiguity

    2 2

    Free Sonata form

    Polyphonic

    Difficult to make out key

    No key signature C maj?

    Begins with a slow introduction

    Fig Y Oboes 2 bars after A to be developed

    Fig X Flutes 6 bars after A to be mainly developed

    37 Bars after A strong modal passage ends in dissonance

    Beginning of main part of movt at B

    Same tempo, but faster rhythms

    First 'Subject' Flutes/Oboes 1 bar after BSecond 'Subject' Violin 12 bars after B

    Codetta rounds off this beginning at 15 bars after C

    Dev based on Fig X at D

    Fig X seen - Violins at D

    Just before F, Fig X used contrapuntally in overlapping imitation

    Fig Y seen Cello 2 bars after F

    Fig X seen Cello 4 bars after F

    6 Bars after F imitative polyphony based on Fig X

    This imitative polyphony continues right until 6 bars after G

    A 'hidden' Recap appears 7 bars after G

    Apparent slowing down using rhythm rather than tempo

    Enters as a sound mass into texture (of slow opening section) of the Dev

    The melody of the intro is placed in the warm middle range of the celloIn this way, it dominates the music and becomes prominent in this passage

    Recap at I

    New figure replaces first subject suggests Modern

    Recap is expanded compared to the Expo

    Abrupt change to the expected Codetta at K

    Coda

    First real change of tempo (to Poco allargando)

    Page 17

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    18/24

    Symphonies

    Horn chords sound threatening

    First negative mood in the movt

    2 Bars after L High point of threatening mood

    Winds question 5 Bars after L

    Brass answer threateningly at M

    7 Bars after M Threatening passage resolves

    Massive Cmaj chordMost important secondary harmony in dorian mode

    Equivalent of perfect cadence in dorian mode

    Page 18

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    19/24

    Symphonies

    II

    Allegretto moderatoG minor

    3 4

    Homophonic

    Opening

    Based on D melodic minor desc

    Of major and minor, this is closest to the Dorian

    The rising pattern of this scale creates ambiguity

    Continues the ambiguity from the first movt

    Uses unexpected/ambiguous chords

    Bar 10 shows the clear shift to 3 4 (long,short)

    The chords created by the flutes and oboes 2 bars before A

    suggest, but do not reach the key of Gmin. This continuestonal ambiguity in the symphony as a whole.

    This is intensified by the Eb D resolution, which rises a maj 7th

    instead of falling a semitone.

    Theme 1 Violins A

    Theme 2 Violins 7 bars after A

    Sequence of rising scales 7 bars after A (see Fig Y)

    12 Bars after C rhythm shifts to triplets (once again fast thanks to rhythm)

    Sound masses just before E

    Texture becomes polyphonic

    Theme 1,2 combined Violins 8 bars after E

    Fig Z Flutes 3 bars after F

    Coda at G

    Semiquavers make it seem fasterDevelops figures such as Fig Z

    Sibelius's Finnish inspiration?

    Describing valley/sunshine he 'puts in his music'?

    Final chords

    In Gmin: i V IV - i

    Plagal cadence (IV i) in minor key with raised 6th(E)

    Sustains ambiguity of the key

    Symphony No. 6

    Mo

    19

    2 Fl

    2 O

    2 ClaBass

    2 Bas

    4 H

    3 Tru

    3 Tro

    Ha

    Doubl

    Tim

    2 Vi

    Vi

    4 Mov

    Ce

    Page 19

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    20/24

    Symphonies

    Page 20

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    21/24

    Symphonies

    III

    Poco vivaceD Dorian mode

    6 8

    Homophonic

    Opening

    Theme 1 Violins Bar 1

    Theme 2 Violins Bar 13

    Subsidiary idea Oboes 5 bars before A

    10 bars after A present a 'fuller' version of Theme 2 by the flutes

    Alternating accompaniment' at B

    Shows homophonic texture with accompaniment alternating between

    winds and string with 1stViolin carrying melody

    5 bars after D brass interrupts this pattern with a blastChange to triplets (six semiquavers)

    This section creates an opening for a gradual return to the opening

    7 bars after D Gradual Return to Opening

    Free reprise of 1sthalf of movt.

    Coda 4 bars after I

    Ominous brass chords dominate the Coda

    The third movt's themes continue the ambiguity of the other two

    movts by generally avoiding the 6thand 7

    thdegrees of the scale.

    Jean Sibelius

    ern

    23

    utes

    oes

    rinets larinet

    soons

    rns

    pets

    bones

    rp

    Bass

    pani

    lins

    la

    ments

    llo

    Page 21

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    22/24

    Symphonies

    Page 22

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    23/24

    Symphonies

    IV

    Allegro moltoD Dorian mode

    4 4

    Introduction

    Choral' melody

    Harmonically reminiscent of the 1stmovt

    Exposition/Beginning of Main Movt at B

    Theme 1 Violins 5 bars after B

    Theme 1 alternates between Violin and Viola

    Theme 1's Eb gives impression of a Neopolitan

    Theme 2 Violins 3 bars after C

    Theme 2 has elements from Fig X and ZTheme 2: note the B natural

    2 bars after D: Strong modal cadence: Dmin Cmaj

    in lieu of codetta

    6 bars after D Fully written out repeat of expo

    3 bars after F Chromatic sequences and dissident Modern harmonies

    create a very tense atmosphere

    Development at G

    This is based extensively on Theme 2

    The threatening brass is strongly present

    5 bars after G dev of Theme 2 inverted

    Second part of Dev at I

    Based on opening choral, but faster and harmonically distorted

    19 Bars after D Flutes reveal Theme 1 to be derived from theopening choral

    The choral melody would usually return in the Coda, but here the choral

    returns in a faster form together with a fragment of Theme 1 which

    suggests a Recap

    Coda 1 bar after O

    Proper, slow version of the choral

    16 bars after P Formerly Cmaj cadential chord, becomes an open

    Page 23

  • 5/20/2018 Sibelius, Beethoven and Nielsen Comparison

    24/24

    Symphonies

    5thin A (the dominant), which resolves into a unison D

    Page 24